| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I rarely can't find anything positive to say about a site, but this site was really so bad it doesn't have any pros |
| Cons: |
Video quality is not quality at all. The average wmv file size at this site is around 20mb or less with many falling around 6mb. Even a large file I downloaded (83mb) was still in a 720x480 frame, was not HD, and it still looked like the picture was getting stretched when you maximized the video window. The smaller files are clearly designed for an old school site and to be played in a very small window (320x240).
The design of the site really looks outdated. I have talked in the past about sites that hearken back to the nineties. In this case, if I didn't know better, I would say the site was designed somewhere around 1979. It actually reminds me of an old Adam and Eve catalog from the 1970s. Basically a page which a bunch of thumbnails, no titles or descriptions for videos, and you don't even get any clue as to the size and quality until you open the page that has the video on it.
Absolutely no search capability or indexing whatsoever.
I have run out of room to keep complaining |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is probably the biggest ripoff I have ever personally encountered. I went for it basically because they also included a membership to Romanvideoarchives.com. That turned out be an even worse selling point.
Basically I think a lot of these videos actually do date back to the late seventies or eighties. At least they look like they do. The quality is sub-par, even by 1970s standards. There are times when you can tell they just put the camera there, hit record, and that's the only shot your going to see the whole time, even when the actors move out of frame. It really is pretty bad quality just at the most basic, point-and-shoot level.
This site doesn't seem to be updating, though they claim they are. If they are they are only updating with old videos from the archive, because I have yet to see anything that looks like it was even shot within the last five years. Even webcams have better video quality now than what they were using.
The bottom line here is that if you waste a single cent on this site you're getting burned. I am trying to post this ASAP in the hopes I can prevent some of you from making the same mistake I did. If you are looking for cuckold videos there are far better sites like Cuckoldcream that will cost you about the same amount. They have clearly designed this site for low bandwith users, and file size (and quality) designed for streaming or downloading through a 56k modem (remember those days). I guess if you're feeling nostalgic for a five or ten min video that has been broken down into 2min videos meant to be played in about a four inch window, then this is the site for you. Otherwise, I would avoid this site like the plague.
P.S. Don't let the "tour" or "start page" windows fool you. The page shown above (or for this site here) is not the actual "members" page. Once you click "members" it takes you to the page from the 1970s. |
|
06-25-12 10:33am
Replies (4)
|
Review
27
|
Kneel Beg Crawl
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There may be a few videos here you will like, for the most part though it's pretty much homemade crap. Bad quality, low-rent, and obviously being shot in the same handful of apartments every time. The chicks are pretty hot. This looks like a half ass attempt by a few working or up and coming stars to start their own site. Unfortunately they fail miserably. |
| Cons: |
There's no index or navigation worth a flip on this site. Basically you get to choose between a few links that take you to pages that look like something right out of 1998. A bunch of pictures just haphazardly splashed across the page under pics, some really badly typed descriptions of videos, and all sorts of broken links and missing image files. Low rent doesn't even begin to describe this site. The video quality is average on their movies, but the content is pretty questionable in terms of value. The pics are not professional looking. Basically they are counting on the fact that the girls are hot to carry everything. But there are just as good looking women working on a lot better quality sites than this one, so it begs the question as to whether this is really worth your money. |
| Bottom Line: |
Basically you are looking at a very small amount of videos for what they charge, and you will have seen them all within a day. Even if you like them, you'll end up with maybe ten that are worth keeping. For the price they are charging it is really not a good value when you could join any other site and will immediately be stepping up from this very archaic looking site. |
|
02-08-12 09:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Need to two to three times per day
|
01-06-17 12:08pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It reminds of when I was sixteen
|
01-06-17 12:07pm
|
Reply
30
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Nowhere near the quality layouts u get with video box. It is annoying because you don't get any sort of preview of the scene, just numbers that change the video playing in the window. Downloading their clips requires you to wait till the video loads too, which really slows down the whole process.
Get 1mo membership, you'll have plenty of time to get the whole decade u spoke of.
|
11-13-12 06:36am
|
Reply
31
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
She has plenty of legit movies, and they link to a few of her other movies where you can buy the DVD. When they list the star's catalog, anything they don't have sends you to a place you can buy their DVD releases.
|
11-13-12 06:31am
|
Comment
32
|
Pack Of Porn
(0)
|
|
10-10-12 09:50am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
That is much more of a cultural issue than a legal issue. Sort of the same way US Americans might be perceived as preferring violence over sex or love if you try to judge us by our most popular mediums. I can kill 50 people in a movie and still get a PG rating, but one quick peek at a cock or vagina is likely to prevent your movie from receiving a rating at all, and therefore no distribution. Definitely not our place to judge anyone else's practices.
|
08-31-12 07:59am
|
Reply
34
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Review
Excellent review. I will be putting this one on my wish list
|
08-09-12 01:43pm
|
Reply
35
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
op9527's Review
That's awesome that you and your wife do this together.
|
08-09-12 01:42pm
|
Reply
36
|
Alternadudes
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I think I'm bi, but maybe I'm just Tri. LOL
|
08-09-12 01:40pm
|
Reply
37
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
Bluesurfer's Review
We could use a little more info. I looked at this site and one of my first questions is whether it is all softcore? It looks like a lot of softcore, lipstick lesbian material. Will I see girls getting tied up, pounded with a strapon, etc?
|
08-08-12 11:44am
|
Reply
38
|
Alternadudes
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
Excellent review. Thank you for reviewing a gay site. I find I tend to only join or look at gay sites that are associated with other networks sites like 21 Sextreme or something. So, it is nice to see a review of a standalone gay site. Thanks again.
|
08-08-12 11:37am
|
Reply
39
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Review written.
|
08-08-12 11:32am
|
Comment
40
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
|
07-30-12 11:19pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
41
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
That does sound like so BS. Sorry to hear that. I have had no problems with them, but I did join after the split. In fact, the split is what kept me from joining for so long because I was basically interested in about half of what they offered in each.
I won't try to defend them and I certainly understand your frustration. At the same time as big as these sites and this network is getting, the split was inevitable. The alternative would have probably been to start raising the prices. From a sales-perspective, that very well could have been a death sentence for their business. It's really hard to get people to join sites for over twenty dollars these days. I think they screwed up in how they divided the site. They should have made 21 Sextreme an actual addition, because that's really what it is anyway, and just charged an extra ten bucks a month to add it on. Or they could have made it more "extreme" period so that it can stand on its own.
|
07-30-12 12:33pm
|
Reply
42
|
MistressT.net
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I agree and disagree. Mistress T's isn't bad, but I made the mistake of reading Next Door Nikki's blog one time and I started losing all respect for her. LOL. I like T's stuff just because she usually sticks to the topic of sex. I really don't care about porn stars who had an altercation at a grocery store or ran into some girl they stuck their tongue in two years ago and decided to go have coffee together. I have never used Twitter. Porn stars are probably the only ones I would follow and I am too paranoid somebody might see them on my work phone. LOL
|
07-30-12 12:27pm
|
Reply
43
|
MistressT.net
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
There is quite a bit of stuff there for you to look at. It's not as big as other sites. It is all exclusive material, so it's worth it for that. This is one of those sites you join because you're probably a fan Mistress T. I will tell you almost everything she does is her with 1 other guy, but ocasionally she has a guest mistress on there along with herself. A lot of spoken/instructional vids where she tells you why you're going to do what she says. I like it because she does a lot of masturbation instructional videos and she always include you in the storyline or the plot; she's always your evil wicked stepmother forcing you to jack off in your own hand, etc. Very kinky, fun stuff.
|
07-30-12 10:28am
|
Reply
44
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Personally I am a fan of wmv hd files myself. They are a little smaller and I don't notice that big of a diff in terms of quality. They do also do mp4 as well. The big issue now, like I said, is that now to get the standard HD quality we have all come to know and love you are having to do files over 1gb.
|
07-30-12 10:20am
|
Reply
45
|
Sharing My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
For me, and I suspect others as well, there are two kinds of cuckolding sites now, "straight cuckolding" where the girl just fucks another guy in front of her cuck and/or tells him how worthless he is, and the more extreme "forced bi-sex cuckolding" sites where the cuck is usually forced to service the couple with little to no reward. The latter is more like what you find on Cumeating Cuckolds. Is this what you mean by "raunchy." Not trying to criticize, but all porn is raunchy. LOL.
So my question is do they have forced bi-sex at the site? This is not always easy to determine from stills taken from the videos. Good review btw.
|
07-29-12 10:43am
|
Reply
46
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yes, I have tried a few of the others like this out there, and this is still the best imo.
|
07-29-12 10:01am
|
Reply
47
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Been a member of videobox for a few years now and I still tell people it is the best deal around.
|
07-19-12 09:00am
|
Reply
48
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Nice review, as a result I signed up. In all honesty I had no idea Rodney Moore had done so much work, and is still doing it. It gives hope to fugly, well-hung men everywhere. LOL.
|
07-12-12 09:38am
|
Reply
49
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Thanks for that. I agree, it's hard to find male focused BDSM.
|
07-10-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
50
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
The quality does vary from year to year, but for the most part, even the new stuff was pretty bad.
|
07-10-12 12:19pm
|
