| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, when you click on those it takes you to a page with the video at the top, and underneath is the photoset. Her latest update didn't have a photoset with it though.
|
06-25-12 03:39pm
|
Reply
52
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
My dlm only seems to have a problem on the home/update pages of ATK sites, where they post the most recent vids and pics. If I go to the model's individual page/gallery with all of her stuff, my dlm doesn't seem to have the problem. Since the home/update page changes everyday I can see where this may be a problem for dlms. Of course all of the bigger money sites are starting to rotate the addresses of their videos to prevent site raping. Another annoying thing I have been seeing is where you cannot continue browsing once you start downloading. Ferro Network does this.
|
06-21-12 11:47pm
|
Reply
53
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, each video also comes with a photo gallery.
|
06-21-12 11:41pm
|
Reply
54
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
I personally only run into this problem with the new videos off the front pages in ATK Hairy. That makes sense because each video is listed under a new day each time. From the model's actual gallery page, I don't have as much problem. Maybe it has something to do with the actual age of the model's page itself???
|
06-21-12 11:30am
|
Reply
55
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Great review. I am a huge fan of anything ATK does. I also like the fact that they stole the Taekwondo organization's name. LOL. You are absolutely right about repeat modeling. Sativa Verde just did a live cam show for ATK Hairy and was talkingabout that very thing. She started as model working for anyone, fell in love with working for ATK, now she is shooting models herself for them. I also like the fact that girls that appear in Galleria may wind up in Hairy at some point, and vice versa.
Now they are offering a big deal where you can get access to all their sites for like a hundred a month. It's a steep price, but for me, it has always been a tough choice between all their sites.
|
06-21-12 11:27am
|
Reply
56
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
I gave the score of 79 for that exact reason. I can appreciate that my cons may very well be your pros. I tried to keep my score at least within the range and focus of other reviewers. Personally, it might have been closer to a 69 for me, but like I said, how do you applaud a site for doing the minimum to be a good site. It functions, it's clunky, but it functions. LOL. At the same time, I reserve bad ratings for sites that truly screw us over. I don't think everyone will be screwed over by these guys, but I don't think everyone is going to be happy with their purchase either. Thanks for pointing this out though. At least some people are paying attention ;)
|
06-21-12 11:20am
|
Reply
57
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Their "nylon sites" are pretty interesting. Frankly, those were usually some of the better videos. Basically there was a site for just solo models in lingerie with a focus on pantyhose, then that with two girls, which usually ended up with some fairly hardcore strapon sex or other toys (it's not just muff diving), then there was one for boy/girl action, and then it sort of splits off into other categories. There is a site with trannys in pantyhose, a gay site with men in pantyhose, and a femdom site with the men in the pantyhose get pounded by chicks with strapons. So, I can't say for sure this is what you would be looking for, but as you can see, it is very much the "buckshot approach" to the subject of nylons. they really do seem to be covering just about every human configuration, save for maybe the nylon orgy.
|
06-21-12 10:09am
|
Reply
58
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I could see that. Their "tour" still has a lot of amateurish-looking material. Of course, some people may prefer that anyway. You're right, though, the models are all super, super hot.
|
06-11-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
59
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
wildbillnj1975's Comment
Yes, this was major issue with this site. I wasn't a huge fan of the update methods either. basically you got a different angle of some mad sex party every day. These are some of the annoying aspects of Tainster.
|
06-11-12 11:26pm
|
Reply
60
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
Download limits are always suspicious to me. On the one hand I can see where a solo artist may do this just to try to keep people around an extra month. I mean, c'mon, a girl's gotta make a living and you kind of expect it from the sex trade industry. But then there's those sites that just look low-rent and shady, and I think you have found a great example of this.
|
06-11-12 11:22pm
|
Reply
61
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
A most excellent review. Very thorough. I have thought about joining this site before, now I may go ahead and do it. Thanks.
|
06-11-12 11:16pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I love perving on the streets. LOL. This is the time of year when you can walk around with dark sunglasses on behind chicks in bikinis.
|
06-11-12 08:18am
|
Reply
63
|
Chaturbate
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, I know, it gets creepy sometimes.
|
06-11-12 12:07am
|
Reply
64
|
My Teen Oasis
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yeah, I have gotten access to most of those sites through other sites like this, I think through DevilsFilms. Mainly the lack of search capability keeps it from working well. At any rate, I totally agree with your scoring.
|
06-10-12 02:44am
|
Comment
65
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
|
06-10-12 02:22am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
66
|
Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Personally I think sites like this are very niche specific, as in you either go totally gaga over the girl or guy, or not. Sites like these are always hard to review because first and foremost you have to be a huge fan of the individual. This is partly how they justify the higher, fetish-level prices for sites like this. Good job on the review.
|
05-20-12 01:33pm
|
Reply
67
|
College Fuck Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Wow, this sounds like an awful site. I think I might have scored it even lower just from how you described the camera work in the videos. What's the point of having a variety of porn stars if all you see is their groins. It annoys me how easy it is for anyone to be a filmmaker these days because the technology is so simple now. Yet, there are still morons out there who can't even figure out how to work the zoom properly. Thanks for the heads up.
|
05-20-12 01:27pm
|
Reply
68
|
VCA XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Videobox does have a classics section, but it is mostly 1990s stuff.
I think a lot of sites stay away from them because the video quality is so bad they think people won't want them. Some of the more popular stars like Marilyn Chambers or Traci Lords might see their stuff remastered, but I doubt much effort will be spent on old porn.
|
05-07-12 10:22am
|
Reply
69
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
There is no excuse for poor quality photos on any site given today's technology. What is sounds like you are describing is someone who started a half-assed site, and never did anything to make it better. Thanks for the heads up.
|
05-07-12 10:17am
|
Reply
70
|
VCA XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
This is a shame to here. I love classic porn and in particular a certain period in which VCA was very active. It seems like these films are almost public domain and wouldn't cost much for sites to stock, but I have yet to find a truly good classic porn site that didn't have a lot of the problems you mentioned here. Thanks for the heads up.
|
05-05-12 03:18pm
|
Reply
71
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
I have always been iffy about this site because I personally get bored with their content after awhile. Like so many others, I find maybe one out of every ten videos worth the search. They do have a lot of content, I just never quite got on board with their style. Thanks for the review though, very informative.
|
05-05-12 03:15pm
|
Reply
72
|
3D Maxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
shmeagles's Review
Wow, thanks for the heads up. That sort of business practice really ticks me off.
|
04-21-12 07:21pm
|
Reply
73
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
I personally rank Abby Winters higher, though I certainly have lamented on some of the softcore issues with them in the past too. I do think their models are much better, I really like their business model, and overall I think they are one of the best sites on the net. The fact that they may be a little too softcore for my tastes doesn't detract from how I would rank them. But, I understand not everybody likes the same things too, so you certainly have a valid point. I think it's safe to say the more popular Aussie porn seems to be a hit or miss with everyone else.
|
04-21-12 04:53pm
|
Reply
74
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
This another one of those sites I wasn't sure about, but your advice has helped me to make up my mind. Thanks for the great review.
|
04-20-12 05:06pm
|
Reply
75
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
I have thought about subscribing to this site in the past, but I was concerned about some of the things you brought in your review. You confirmed a few suspicions, and enlightened me to a few things I didn't know. Thanks for the heads up.
|
04-20-12 05:04pm
|
