| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Devils Film
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tons of movies, with a wide range of content. The quality of the films is better than what you will find at some sites. This is due to the fact that this is an actual porn company, not just a website. As a result you get to draw upon there entire range of films.
Subject or niche-wise, you get a little bit of everything from straight sex to some femdom. They have a lot of bisexual material, some femdom, but their overall focus seems to be fairly traditional stuff like teens, gangbangs, etc.
They allow you a choice of video quality selections. Newer stuff is HD, while older stuff isn't likely to be, or likely to be as high quality as the newer 1080p stuff. Everything is in mp4 format.
Slick website design and a fairly easy to navigate interface. Also a fairly reasonable price. |
| Cons: |
Very little search capabilities. They tag so many things, but you can't really search very effectively on this site.
It hates my download manager. They use some sort of rotating links or something, so my dlm can handle it fine for about thirty minutes or so, then I have to refresh all the links. This may not be the case for all dlms.
Download speeds vary with them. At times I have seen them slow way down to less than 500k/sec. This is only at certain times, and I suspect they are updating the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
The lack of effective search capabilities, the slowdowns, and the inconveniences with dlms make this a less than 90 site in my opinion. Which is a shame, because otherwise it is a good site. I would argue that most sites like this are primarily competing with Videobox and a few others. Devils Film has enough uniqueness to allow them to compete with Videobox, but some poor choices in website design, and relatively the same material everyone else has to offer, I think will ultimately make them a second or third choice in comparison to other similar sites like Video Box or Red light. |
|
05-05-12 03:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
27
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Thanks for that. I agree, it's hard to find male focused BDSM.
|
07-10-12 12:20pm
|
Review
28
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is part of the Kink.com network of sites, so you can generally expect pretty high quality from them. Their videos range (depending on ho wold they are) in size and quality, but most are HD videos, or near that quality for some of the oldest stuff. Most everything I downloaded was around 300mb or higher mark, 640x360 mp4s. You have a choice between low, med, and high quality video downloads. Streaming is pretty solid here as well. Even when I have several video pages opening up the streams all come in pretty quick (faster than videobox).
Probably the biggest selling point is the star power. People like Bobbi and Aiden Starr are the standard at Kink.com. I am always amazed at the range of talent these women have. Very talented, very attractive stars in all their videos. There really isn't such a thing as a "bad" video at their site.
When I joined they were offering two for one specials and I also got a membership at meninpain.com. |
| Cons: |
The search within the Divine Bitches website works fine, but if you click on a star's name to see everything he/she has done it takes you to a listing of all of their kink.com work. If you click on a video from this page even for something they shot for Divine Bitches, it takes you a pay-per-view page rather than the actual Divine Bitches site. So that's a little annoying. You can still type Aiden Starr into the search in Divine Bitches and pull up her DB videos only and download them.
Kink.com likes to link to their other sites a lot. There no real chance of actually ordering something by accident in the pay-per-view, but they really do like to hype their other sites. It was a little alarming to me the first time I joined a kink.com site and it made me a little paranoid that I might accidentally join another site. This is not the case, I assure you.
They throw a lot at you on the start page. It can be a little overwhelming at times. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink.com is a group you can usually trust, and also a group that seems to be setting the standards for fetish videos such as these (BDSM, femdom, latex, etc.). I scored Divine Bitches a 94 because a) there is always room for improvement and b) they could do soemthing to make navigation a little easier, mainly indexing the videos by star within the individual site, rather than all of kink.com. If they did that I could easily see myself giving this site a 98 (I can't ever see a site going much higher than that).
As far as recommendation goes, I have been a member in other kink.com sites and I can say they all seem to be pretty good. This site was one I hadn't really looked at before, and frankly I think it is one of their better sites. You get a nice range of femdom BDSM here that covers a variety of subjects (cuckolding, BDSM,ball torture, teasing, masturbation instruction, so on and so forth), whereas some of their other sites are more specific or focused in terms of the niche. I think if you are interested in any of the kink.com sites and don't know which one to try, this might be the safest bet. |
|
06-25-12 11:08am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
29
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
Download limits are always suspicious to me. On the one hand I can see where a solo artist may do this just to try to keep people around an extra month. I mean, c'mon, a girl's gotta make a living and you kind of expect it from the sex trade industry. But then there's those sites that just look low-rent and shady, and I think you have found a great example of this.
|
06-11-12 11:22pm
|
Review
30
|
Femdom Worship
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great videos. I know that seems really subjective to say, but their videos are really top notch for the sort of low-rent production value you usually see in these types of fetish videos. Beautiful girls and the men are usually varied enough that you can find someone who suits your tastes. The action is not so all over the place like a lot of femdom videos. I like this because if I want just a strapon scene, "bam" there it is! No ff-ing through a twenty minute video to find what your looking for. Categories they focus on are: Foot Fetish, Domination, Cock Control, Facesitting and Strapon. The videos in each category are varied, some are extreme domination, some of them are girls just basically making the guys hard before they screw the hell out of them. This site is all about the quality of content rather than quantity.
This is their only real "pro," but I want to make it clear this a big pro. |
| Cons: |
Interface and site layout hearkens back to the 1990s. Not the biggest issue to me, I don't really care how the site looks. The navigation could use a major upgrade though and include some currently non-existent search capabilities.
Non-English. They do provide subtitles, but usually when you see Russian sites like this they keep the dialogue to a minimum for whatever reasons. Don't expect a lot of domination dialogue.
Video format is basic. You don't get a lot of choice in formats here. The real annoying thing is that you can download clips, but if you try to download the whole, joined file it is called "fulllength" every time. So you have to either rename the file or you end up fulllength_01 through 50.
Limited amount of videos. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of videos here, but if you are a major pornophile who downloads a lot (3-5 movies per site per day), like me, then you may find the well running dry after a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's ugly, clunky, and outdated website would initially make most people run these days. Frankly, I look at this as a sort of "underground" scene in the porn community, and so appearances may not always be the most important aspect. When you are talking about fetish sites catering to specific niches, then your content must be good. You cannot take the scatter shot approach that more diverse sites can where they can just throw a ton of different content at you and hope there's something in there for everyone. Femdom Worship is about femdom material, which limits the scope and their ability to make diverse videos.
That being said, Femdom Worship has managed to bring some really impressive content to the internet. The specificity of their categories really adds to this I think. Facesitting may or may not end up in screwing too, but you know you are going to see facesitting stuff through 75% of the video.
This is nice because frankly I get tired of downloading 1gb videos just to see two minutes of facesitting or strapon sex. The videos here are good enough quality (NOT HD) and small enough in clips size, or really even the full length ones too, that you can download them fast and they don't take up a lot of room on your hdd.
Rant: Porn sites have gotten too complicated in some ways, and it's nice to see ole school sites like this still managing to prove what we all really know deep down inside; quality over quantity. Yeah, you may pretty much see everything they have to offer within a few months, less probably, but at least what you are seeing is worth paying for. Basically for the price of a few porn DVDs or Blu Rays you're going to end up with a lot more video that is all good. You could actually think of this as buying a 10-20 hour DVD set of niche material that will cost you more anyway for being "fetish."
Yes, they could improve their search capabilities, but then again, I think searching is getting too overrated in some cases. You know what niches exist at sites like this, take a little time to stop and smell the roses. Browsing is fun!
The real bottom line is that for a month or two this site will deliver. It's not the greatest femdom site, but the content is pretty top notch. Having seen the content, I would buy these clips or videos individually, so paying for a site membership for a few months is certainly a reasonable bargain. I should also add that they are updating fairly often, so in another year this may actually be a fairly huge site if they keep up their pace (no less than 2-3 times a week). If this happens, and they at least created a model index, I would certainly consider raising their score up into the 90s. |
|
03-30-12 10:30am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
31
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Their "nylon sites" are pretty interesting. Frankly, those were usually some of the better videos. Basically there was a site for just solo models in lingerie with a focus on pantyhose, then that with two girls, which usually ended up with some fairly hardcore strapon sex or other toys (it's not just muff diving), then there was one for boy/girl action, and then it sort of splits off into other categories. There is a site with trannys in pantyhose, a gay site with men in pantyhose, and a femdom site with the men in the pantyhose get pounded by chicks with strapons. So, I can't say for sure this is what you would be looking for, but as you can see, it is very much the "buckshot approach" to the subject of nylons. they really do seem to be covering just about every human configuration, save for maybe the nylon orgy.
|
06-21-12 10:09am
|
Comment
32
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
|
06-10-12 02:22am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
33
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I thought the same thing. It's like "jeez they're really proud of themselves." Yes, it's a little annoying, but I didn't find that it got in the way of anything.
Most people already cover the technical stuff on these forums and reviews, what's the point of repeating it. LOL.
|
02-12-12 12:09pm
|
Reply
34
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
You can join a lot of the individual sites for a 7.95 trial offer. That's what I did. I took one look at one site and said "Hell yeah I'll take the rest!" Anyway, if you join just one site, they have a different kind of loyalty program. You get to pick one bonus site, then if you stick around for a month you get to add another bonus site. Of course, by this time you're paying the thirty dollar a month charge, but you have to give them props for creating incentives. If you just want to see a couple join one with the trial and pick a different kind of site for the bonus and see what you think.
|
02-09-12 08:25pm
|
Review
35
|
Ferro Network
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.
Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too. |
| Cons: |
There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)
Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.
Very little search and navigation capability.
Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords. |
| Bottom Line: |
Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice. |
|
02-09-12 08:19pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
36
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
I gave the score of 79 for that exact reason. I can appreciate that my cons may very well be your pros. I tried to keep my score at least within the range and focus of other reviewers. Personally, it might have been closer to a 69 for me, but like I said, how do you applaud a site for doing the minimum to be a good site. It functions, it's clunky, but it functions. LOL. At the same time, I reserve bad ratings for sites that truly screw us over. I don't think everyone will be screwed over by these guys, but I don't think everyone is going to be happy with their purchase either. Thanks for pointing this out though. At least some people are paying attention ;)
|
06-21-12 11:20am
|
Review
37
|
Fetish Network
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?
The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.
I have never found a dead link.
I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.
The appearance and layout is functional.
Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.
You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.
They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this). |
| Cons: |
The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.
Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.
This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.
Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.
I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?" |
|
06-21-12 10:45am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
38
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
I personally rank Abby Winters higher, though I certainly have lamented on some of the softcore issues with them in the past too. I do think their models are much better, I really like their business model, and overall I think they are one of the best sites on the net. The fact that they may be a little too softcore for my tastes doesn't detract from how I would rank them. But, I understand not everybody likes the same things too, so you certainly have a valid point. I think it's safe to say the more popular Aussie porn seems to be a hit or miss with everyone else.
|
04-21-12 04:53pm
|
Review
39
|
Girls Out West
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Decent amount of content, there's plenty here to keep you busy for a long time.
Clearly amateur-ish. "Amateur" is such a subjective term, but the girls and guys here are clearly not professionals, thought hey are certainly not virgins to porn after their first shoot.
More natural women, less make-up and porn-like qualities. |
| Cons: |
Video quality is relative to whatever they shot it with. I'm not sure they aren't using Super * in some cases, the quality is that bad.
Amateur porn, you get what you expect, amateur quality.
Selection of content is all pretty much the same. Apparently Aussies aren't into exciting or passionate sex. The lesbian sex here is really just masturbation with a little kissing. Tame by reality standards. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site wants to e Abby Winters so badly they think they can just coast off that business model. Unfortunately they fail in this regard, and realistically, if their is any real talent they tend to wind up at Abby Winters anyway. Not that these are the only two Aussie sites, but they do seem to be closely linked in terms of style, content, and even models.
You're better off spending the extra money at Abby Winters. You will get about the same amount in terms of diversity, maybe a little less m/f than GOW, but the quality of GOW m/f hardcore, if you can call it that, was so lame you're better off without it. |
|
04-20-12 05:14pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
40
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
op9527's Review
That's awesome that you and your wife do this together.
|
08-09-12 01:42pm
|
Review
41
|
Indie Porn Revolution
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Used to be NoFauxxx.com, so you can expect to find "No Fake" porn here, and it's true. These are real, ordinary, and often very average (in terms of appearance) people. So, for a semi-amateur site you can count on this to be truly amateur type vids and pics. It's no the mail-in-your-ex-girlfriend-video type of stuff so that's why I say semi-am.
Expect production values that are decent, but not high quality. This adds to the authenticity of the am quality.
The real selling point, imo, is that these are real people, real lesbians in particular with all their butchness or femininity. To be honest, it is really hard to tell the boys from the girls until they start going down on each other here. There are both female and male transsexuals (people who have been surgically altered). This is a rare opportunity to see a transsexual male (female to male) in porn. James Darling is every bit male until you see him getting fisted in his vagina.
Most of them seem to have a wicked sense of humor |
| Cons: |
It's semi-am, so it's semi-am quality most of the time. In well lit rooms everything is fine. But they also feature some videos of some sort of live show they do, and though they appear okay, it is a single camera trying to cover a live stage show.
This may not necessarily be a con, but the BBWs tend to pop up in a lot of the videos. If you have an aversion to fat rolls, you may not like all of the vids here.
Navigation is abysmal. Very few ways to navigate. Basically just pages with all their clips. Fortunately you can look at the models or "Foxes" and see what they have available that way.
Can't download pics in zips.
To download the videos, as far as I can see, you have to go into a member's viewing page, and there is still no download link. My DLM picks up on the link and lets me download, but I don't know about other DLMs or right-click options.
Very finite number of videos and photo sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
Apparently they are in the process of transitioning from NoFauxx to Indie Porn Rev. So, as more professional reviewers have pointed out, some of the cons may be as a result of this.
What really sold me on this site was first, the new name. How can you not want to be part of a porn revolution. Their mission statement (yes, they actually post their mission statement, how awesome is that) says they are a "queer" site that includes everything, including straight sex. You will even get a brief lesson on how to address trans and queer-gendered (sir, ma'am, etc.) They have clearly tried to carve out a small area for people who do not fit the typical cookie-cutter molds for porn stars, as well as for people who do not fit easily into gender and sex categories. So, for that alone it's worth looking into.
The problem lies in their lack of material. I hate to say this about a site I have so much respect for, but it's probably better just to do the 5 day membership, because I am not sure they have enough material to keep you busy beyond a few days. I certainly cannot imagine remaining a member of this site for more than 1 month.
All in all I love the idea of this site, I think maybe more than I actually love the site itself. You will get some really good, true-life sex, but most of you will see the entire site within a few days I would suspect. Real lesbian porn is a growing niche and soemthing I particularly like to see, so I hope this site continues to grow over time. |
|
07-30-12 11:50am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
42
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
insatiable's Review
I agree with you. Kink is renown for recycling. One thing everyone should know is that they don't do this on their actual sites. But if you get Kink content from somewhere like VideoBox or here, you will see they are just offering you a fairly respective sampling of the content from each of their sites. You will have a lot to choose from, it will just be more varied.
|
04-19-12 11:25pm
|
Review
43
|
Kneel Beg Crawl
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There may be a few videos here you will like, for the most part though it's pretty much homemade crap. Bad quality, low-rent, and obviously being shot in the same handful of apartments every time. The chicks are pretty hot. This looks like a half ass attempt by a few working or up and coming stars to start their own site. Unfortunately they fail miserably. |
| Cons: |
There's no index or navigation worth a flip on this site. Basically you get to choose between a few links that take you to pages that look like something right out of 1998. A bunch of pictures just haphazardly splashed across the page under pics, some really badly typed descriptions of videos, and all sorts of broken links and missing image files. Low rent doesn't even begin to describe this site. The video quality is average on their movies, but the content is pretty questionable in terms of value. The pics are not professional looking. Basically they are counting on the fact that the girls are hot to carry everything. But there are just as good looking women working on a lot better quality sites than this one, so it begs the question as to whether this is really worth your money. |
| Bottom Line: |
Basically you are looking at a very small amount of videos for what they charge, and you will have seen them all within a day. Even if you like them, you'll end up with maybe ten that are worth keeping. For the price they are charging it is really not a good value when you could join any other site and will immediately be stepping up from this very archaic looking site. |
|
02-08-12 09:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
44
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Review
Excellent review. I will be putting this one on my wish list
|
08-09-12 01:43pm
|
Reply
45
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
Bluesurfer's Review
We could use a little more info. I looked at this site and one of my first questions is whether it is all softcore? It looks like a lot of softcore, lipstick lesbian material. Will I see girls getting tied up, pounded with a strapon, etc?
|
08-08-12 11:44am
|
Reply
46
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
This another one of those sites I wasn't sure about, but your advice has helped me to make up my mind. Thanks for the great review.
|
04-20-12 05:06pm
|
Reply
47
|
MistressT.net
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I agree and disagree. Mistress T's isn't bad, but I made the mistake of reading Next Door Nikki's blog one time and I started losing all respect for her. LOL. I like T's stuff just because she usually sticks to the topic of sex. I really don't care about porn stars who had an altercation at a grocery store or ran into some girl they stuck their tongue in two years ago and decided to go have coffee together. I have never used Twitter. Porn stars are probably the only ones I would follow and I am too paranoid somebody might see them on my work phone. LOL
|
07-30-12 12:27pm
|
Reply
48
|
MistressT.net
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
There is quite a bit of stuff there for you to look at. It's not as big as other sites. It is all exclusive material, so it's worth it for that. This is one of those sites you join because you're probably a fan Mistress T. I will tell you almost everything she does is her with 1 other guy, but ocasionally she has a guest mistress on there along with herself. A lot of spoken/instructional vids where she tells you why you're going to do what she says. I like it because she does a lot of masturbation instructional videos and she always include you in the storyline or the plot; she's always your evil wicked stepmother forcing you to jack off in your own hand, etc. Very kinky, fun stuff.
|
07-30-12 10:28am
|
Review
49
|
MistressT.net
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Let's face it, Mistress T's just looks classy. Everything about her and her sight is just top notch. The site layout has an almost Victorian look to it, but Mistress T herself is a very contemporary, modern woman.
The video quality is just okay. It is clear that she is doing a homemade production here, but this in no way detracts from the quality of the content. The real selling point here are these videos. She is very good at providing accurate descriptions with tags such as forced blowjob, forced bi, cuckolding, etc. It's not too hard to navigate through these and there are search capabilities.
The videos themselves vary, which is also a major selling point. Mistress T likes to roleplay, so you get a lot of solo videos of her playing various roles, such as your step-mom or sister, telling you what to do and how to do it. Other videos include subs and cucks, and she proceeds to put them through their paces.
On top of everything else, Mistress T is pretty damn hot! |
| Cons: |
Slooooow downloads. Less than 1mb/sec, usually 800k/sec for me. You're probably going to want to use a download manager, which I have had no problems with on her sight.
You have to pay extra for unlimited downloads, otherwise you are limited. Though I don't necessarily agree with these practices, I also understand it may be an issue of limiting the load their server has to deal with. Just be aware of this when you sign up.
Could use more guest appearances. It is primarily Mistress T you are coming to see, sure, but occasionally she does pull in a transsexual or a second or third male. It would be nice to see her bring in some more women from time to time, or even dominate some women. |
| Bottom Line: |
As far as fetish cites go Mistress T is certainly raising the bar not only for solo artists like herself, but for larger production companies like Kink.com too.
There is a much more personal connection with the performers in sites like this. Within a few days you get to know MT very well, and every time she tells you to eat your own cum, you get a little closer to doing it.
Whether you are just looking for some really good kink, or perhaps you need a pseudo-dom in your life, then Mistress T's site is definitely something you want to check out. Aside from the slow download speeds, there really isn't much to complain about here. |
|
04-18-12 11:52am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
50
|
My Teen Oasis
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yeah, I have gotten access to most of those sites through other sites like this, I think through DevilsFilms. Mainly the lack of search capability keeps it from working well. At any rate, I totally agree with your scoring.
|
06-10-12 02:44am
|
|
