| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Next Door Nikki
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
It's NDN, and at one point she was, and I would argue still is, one of the hottest women on the internet.
Tons of access to Nikki's life. Yes, I know it sounds cheesy, but just wait till you get to jack off to somebody whose blogs you have been reading for over a month.
Occasionally Nikki will go further than her usual softcore stff. It won't be triple "X" (XXX), but it does get into the single "X" region.
It's NDN. Have I mentioned this before?
Limited nudity. I personally find it incredibly sexy when I'm dying to see more.... and I don't.She's the kind of girl that makes you want to go and just pound one out fully clothed, let alone after she starts teasing.
Probably one of the most perfect bodies in creation.
You get to see some of her friends too, and they get a little more risque than Nikki. So you will get some full on masturbation, fully nude stripping on the site.
Live shows are great, and this is often where you get to see the most of Nikki. Lotsa nipple slips! |
| Cons: |
Very little beyond R-rated softcore stuff. If you want more than stripping, and never seeing her nipples, then move on.
A lot of the same stuff, just different costumes.
Her friends stuff is basically trying to get you to join their sites.
Very expensive.
Limited video qualities.
Some videos are just flat out pointless.
Download limits. They don't have enough videos to let people download them more than 5gb a day, and they're pretty big videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's Next Door Nikki for crying out loud. Either you have obsessed and poured over the internet looking for that one video where she actually fucks someone ore gets totally naked, or you could care less and have no idea who I am talking about.
NDN is an internet sensation primarily because she has never gone fully porn with her career. She is basically a stripper, and one who works in an area where pasties are required. Or, maybe she just likes keeping every guy hoping and dreaming. Either way, I find it very erotic and very exciting. She always brings you right to the edge of being pornographic, but then cuts you off. It can be kind of torturous, very teasing, but for some of us, that is often more stimulating than, as someone else put it here, the "gynecological closeups" of full frontals.
The problems with the site will be overlooked by most fans, because most people joining are niche fans of a specific star who is, in this case, known for being a bit of a cock-tease.
The main drawback is the price versus the amount of content. This is primarily the Phil-Flash materials, and not the entire cadre of NDN's work (there was an old site that is no longer in operation). With the download limit in place, you can still manage to download most of this site in a month.
Why an 85? Because it's NDN. She's will always be above an 80 in my book. She could get into the 90 region if she would figure out a way to feature more people who are willing to go at least XX, and at some point she is either going to have to fuck somebody on screen, or risk losing her career to age. |
|
05-20-12 01:57pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
52
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
There is no excuse for poor quality photos on any site given today's technology. What is sounds like you are describing is someone who started a half-assed site, and never did anything to make it better. Thanks for the heads up.
|
05-07-12 10:17am
|
Comment
53
|
Pack Of Porn
(0)
|
|
10-10-12 09:50am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
54
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
I have thought about subscribing to this site in the past, but I was concerned about some of the things you brought in your review. You confirmed a few suspicions, and enlightened me to a few things I didn't know. Thanks for the heads up.
|
04-20-12 05:04pm
|
Review
55
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Content is top notch, especially given the fact that a lot of these are shot outdoors with a camcorder. Video quality is all pretty high, though you are only given three choices: high, med. and low. High ends up being a mix of different ratios, but most of the newer stuff is pretty large and HD. Expect files sizes nearing 1gb at this level.
Extreme hardcore. This really is a no holds barred cage match. The name says it all.
Good production values and overall quality. This isn't just some shop or home operation. They actually do get out into the streets, though usually in a foreign country, or go to sites (in the US)for a themed shoot. The latter is what I prefer as they are the ones most likely to star a well known porn star.
You never know what will happen. That's awesome. Sometimes people just join in and suddenly there's more than one action to watch. And some of the locations also feed into the fantasy, such as comic book shops, porn theaters, bars, etc. |
| Cons: |
Search is fairly limited. In all fairness these scenes would be hard to tag because they tend to range and include so many things. Basic search options are things like small or large tits, race, age. You cannot search for any type of action or location. Location is something I would like to see included.
You have a finite amount of time that a download manager will work before they shift the pages around on you. Admittedly, this is not a big problem here as this isn't really the type of place you will be downloading mass quantities due to the size of their files and the length of the videos.
It's pretty obvious where the line between reality and fantasy is, especially in their outdoor shoots. It's always the same couple of "strangers" that show up and screw the girl. Other strangers are allowed to interact to some degree. However, and rightly so, they are obviously having to screen potential players in advance. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a really good site if you are into the more extreme BDSM and public sex. I knocked some points off for their limited search capability and overall site layout, which probably would have earned them a score of 95-98.
Content-wise they are hard to compare since there are very few sites like this one. I personally would like to see some male subs from time to time, but that apparently is reserved for other kink.com sites. You can see some big names here like Bobby Starr and Lily LaBeau.
I think ultimately this will be one of those sites you join for a month or so and then move on, perhaps to the other kink.com sites. It would be nice if they would start cutting people deals or allowing them to switch sites within their network from month to month. Personally, I left after a month, but this was due only to my own personal interests in this subject matter. Others may find it more to their liking and stick around longer.
So why did I rank it so high if I was leaving after only one month? All in all the site really is well done and deserves the score it got, despite my own tastes or preferences. I also ranked it so high because it is a kink.com site, and they are all top notch sites. Even if this particular site does not appeal to you I would still recommend checking out their other fetish sites. |
|
03-27-12 11:56am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
56
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
I have always been iffy about this site because I personally get bored with their content after awhile. Like so many others, I find maybe one out of every ten videos worth the search. They do have a lot of content, I just never quite got on board with their style. Thanks for the review though, very informative.
|
05-05-12 03:15pm
|
Reply
57
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Review written.
|
08-08-12 11:32am
|
Review
58
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Hairy Hippie Girls are kind of the selling point here. Lots of natural, often unshaven, women with long hair, tie-dyed dresses.
There is a certain campy, B-movie quality to everything they do. In a away this separates them from mainstream porn, and I found that appealing.
Some incredible amateur models from the Northwest US region. If you are really into the Seattle/Portland scenes, this is probably one of the best samplings of the region. Something about this type of porn just screams "indie-alt-porn."
Major focus on the women. Most of the time this is a result of the POV style of most of Rodney's work.
You'll be surprised how many famous names show up in his videos.
The lesbian videos here, which comprise maybe 20-35% of the stock, are some of the most realistic you will ever see and on par with what you find at sites like We Are Hairy and Abby Winters, not necessarily softcore, but definitely devoid of any testosteronal influences(just one dildo instead of a whole toolbox). |
| Cons: |
Since they don't always wear bras, gravity is a lot harsher on some of the models than others. It can be a little disconcerting seeing the boobs of a fifty year old woman on a twenty year old.
A lot of the models are real hippie chicks with the hygiene and grooming practices that are stereotypical of hippies. With all that hair, sometimes you can actually smell the girls through your computer monitor. Seems like maybe 1 out of every 6 or 7 is just a little too "hippie" for my tastes.
The B-movie quality I mentioned is great sometimes, but other times it is that quality because Rodney Moore doesn't know the first thing about lighting a scene. About half of all the videos will either be too dark and grainy, or so brightly lit it starts to wash out all the details, bushes get all pixelated, etc. So expect about 50% of the movies to be low-quality.
POV style only works if a) you can hold the camera steady and b) you have the light to do so. Rodney often only has one of these. |
| Bottom Line: |
Yes, the video quality sucks, and there is no consistency in terms of the the formats or camerawork. Rodney Moore has ruined many shoots with what was an otherwise super hot chick that just couldn't be seen because he likes to shoot in rooms with natural light. This means every time he shoots something on one side of the room that is brightly lit, the other half of the room looks like it is shrouded in shadow. This throws off his white balance and causes a lot of wash. The reason I keep mentioning this is because on an old CRT monitor this wasn't that noticeable. On a nice new HD LED monitor, this can look like shit. Yeah, I said it.
So why even consider it? Well, probably for the same reason you still like to look up the girls from the 1970s on the PLAYBOY site. It's partly nostalgic for some of us who chased those hairy hippie girls all through college. And some of us get tired of seeing the ultra-professional, ultra-glammed-up porn. And maybe, as a US citizen, I would like to know that we have our own Abby Winters-esque models here in the states. Then there is just the overall feel of this site. Much like Suicide Girls, this site just screams "Pacific Northwest." For those of you who don't know, this area of the US is sort of a Mecca for the indie/alt music scene (the locals get a little miffed about this, but they are always associated with "grunge").
Yes, there are probably more cons than pros with this site. But the pros make up for it, I think. The fact of the matter is that if you are into chicks like these, vid quality is not going to be as big an issue to you. Some of these videos are probably over ten years old at this point and this borders on a retro site. As such it is a lot like getting a membership to a classic porn site. You can't fault the standards of the time for the current video quality, you just have to accept it.
Who should join this site? If you are into hairy, hirsute women, then you want to check this out for at least a month. If you are into amateurs, and particularly younger girls in their early twenties, then you want to check this out. If you like POV, and all of the above, then you want to check this out. And, if you like the smell of patchouli mixed with the aromatic flavors of a wet bush, then you will want to check this site out (you won't really smell it, but you will think you do, so what's the diff).
Will you stay member here indefinitely? probably not. A month or two will suffice for most. The updates aren't necessarily updates, just re-posting of older stuff most of the time. I don't think there is any actual new content coming from him, but I may be wrong. This is more or less an archive site. What's really scary is just how many videos there are in this archive, and how many Rodney himself was in. The guy has got to be rivaling the likes of Ron Jeremy, and he did it in about a third of the time. |
|
08-08-12 11:27am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
59
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
|
07-30-12 11:19pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
60
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Nice review, as a result I signed up. In all honesty I had no idea Rodney Moore had done so much work, and is still doing it. It gives hope to fugly, well-hung men everywhere. LOL.
|
07-12-12 09:38am
|
Reply
61
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, when you click on those it takes you to a page with the video at the top, and underneath is the photoset. Her latest update didn't have a photoset with it though.
|
06-25-12 03:39pm
|
Reply
62
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, each video also comes with a photo gallery.
|
06-21-12 11:41pm
|
Review
63
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Let me preface this all by saying I am an absolute fan of RyAnne Redd. Arguably, why else would you join her site. So, let me give you the break down.
RyAnne is a super-hot redhead with a full bush of red pubes. She really is very unique in terms of her appearance and her particular niche. For those of you unfamiliar with her, she is a popular, and somewhat of a rare commodity, in the "hairy/hirsute" niche. She also has about the most perfect pair of breasts I have ever seen. So much so I called them "Breasts" and not "titties" or "ta-tas" like I normally would.
She is trying to fill a variety of fetishes. She does some jerkoff instruction, some cuckolding, and various other stuff. In a way it is similar to what some women like Mistress T are doing.
Video wuality is pretty good. You get a choice between HD flv, mp4, and "Ipod." |
| Cons: |
Strictly solo material so far. I have seen her in at least one POV blowjob video in the past, but there is nothing but solo material on the site and it would be nice to see her actually fuck someone else or whatever. She's hot, but there are only so many solo videos you can get away with before it starts to just me "lingerie of the week."
Low amount of video content. I'm not going to give you an actual count because this is a new site and it's not fair to her to condemn the site for not having a ton of material yet. That being said, though, it is a shame she couldn't at least get some of her previous videos on her new site. |
| Bottom Line: |
At the moment I have to say the jury is still out on this one. I gave the score of 85 simply because there are thing that make me think this site may be a lot bigger soon. They have links/buttons already in place to scroll through pages of videos and seem to be designing the site basically as you would expect any other soloists site to be. Can it be improved, sure. Better search capability, greater diversity in material, etc. The usual stuff.
The selling point here is that it is RyAnne Redd, and if you are a fan, you are probably an obsessed fan. It's worth a month's subscription just to snag those few extra videos of her.
I have an issue in that I am a huge fan, so I want to just shower her with accolades, but I also think that as a customer other people might want to know what they are paying for. If people don't subscribe, then the site will most likely fail. But telling people to subscribe to a site that has very little to offer right out of the gate isn't really fair to them. If you're a fan, a month's membership is a good way to show your appreciation and encourage her to do more, and I'll leave it at that. |
|
06-21-12 11:11am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
64
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
Ah, the age old not-enough-content dilemma. To subscribe or not to, that is the question. The problem here is you want sites like this to succeed, but you don't actually want o waste your own money if you think you'll get bored.
Personally, I say give them a try for a month, and see if you stick around longer. You can always leave a move on, come back a year later and maybe they've grown. OR, maybe their children are out on the streets starving and homeless because you canceled your subscription and ruined the company. Either way, at least you got to see some boobs.
|
04-19-12 10:40pm
|
Reply
65
|
Sharing My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
For me, and I suspect others as well, there are two kinds of cuckolding sites now, "straight cuckolding" where the girl just fucks another guy in front of her cuck and/or tells him how worthless he is, and the more extreme "forced bi-sex cuckolding" sites where the cuck is usually forced to service the couple with little to no reward. The latter is more like what you find on Cumeating Cuckolds. Is this what you mean by "raunchy." Not trying to criticize, but all porn is raunchy. LOL.
So my question is do they have forced bi-sex at the site? This is not always easy to determine from stills taken from the videos. Good review btw.
|
07-29-12 10:43am
|
Review
66
|
Strapon Dreamer
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The level of porn here is clearly in the upper echelons compared to most sites. Simply put, this place is really top notch. The girls are all pretty gorgeous, and the production value is good quality. They are catering to a few kinks here as well as the strapon femdom. There are occasionally cuckold fantasies, lesbian bondage, and generally something that will cater to your edgier whims. This is not a full blown BDSM site, though there's plenty of it, but it focuses more on the domination angle and ass fucking men with strapons than the whips and chains (though a few are about 50/50).
They actually have a unique feature that seems to be very popular in that that let you write your own fantasies on a message board and if they pick it they will model their shoot after it. They also have some social networking dedicated to these types of interests. So, all in all it has actually turned out to be one of those sites I spend quite a bit of time at. Plenty to do. |
| Cons: |
Unfortunately they are a niche site with a very specific niche, so the amount of videos to date is limited. The selection of formats is limited, but that isn't a real huge issue. It's still quality video, most of it being HV or HD. Where they lack in volume they more than make up for in content and quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Yes, it's a little more expensive, but it is a niche site. I thought I would pay my dues and leave in a month, but I'm still there. Will I keep it for a full year, probably not. Will I give it at least a three or four months, definitely. |
|
02-06-12 08:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
67
|
Subby Hubby
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
5gb/day download limit.
|
03-27-12 12:57am
|
Review
68
|
Subby Hubby
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nice selection of content. Most of the videos seem to be in the form of stories or very thematic sequences of events. They are episodic in nature, which leads me to believe this will be the most common form of updates. Most series seem to be about three to five episodes, and you can download them in their entirety (once they are complete I assume)or as individual clips. They have a selection of download options, including an HD wmv (the rest are SD wmv, mp4, and mobile. They use a flash streamer. Pic quality is good and you can download in a full hi-res zip.
As to content, this is one of the best features. This is cuckolding, bdsm, and general femdom activities. One nice feature is that they actually tag the scenes (a rarity for niche sites)so you can tell which ones have strapon or bi-sex blowjob content, for example. It pretty much ranges the full gambit of femdom. The models are not skanks.They are mixed and you will probably find an attraction to over half of them, if not most. |
| Cons: |
Download options could be better. If you don't like .wmv then this might be a deal breaker for you.
Their pic selection is more limited than there videos, which is odd (it's usually the other way around). Some of this stuff doesn't translate as well to photo, so it wasn't an issue to me. But, if you are a pic junkie then don't count on huge photo content here.
This is one of those sites that messes with download managers. If you are downloading something it pretty much locks the site for you till it's done. It's the usual workaround, just load up all the vids you want to your download manager first and then start downloading. |
| Bottom Line: |
Since this is a brand new site I couldn't rate it any higher than 90. Part of that final number will be dependent on their ability to update and provide fresh new content. It may be a year before we can really gauge that.
That being said, I was really amazed at the amount of content right out of the gate. A lot of good submissive husband videos. The cons were all negligible to me, but I can see where some people may take issue with the cons I mentioned and I am afraid their site will lose potential subscriptions if they don't address these issues.
Niche sites like this are hard to come by. This really is a quality that is beyond what most fetish sites will provide. There use of tags and description make selections easy. The episodic nature of the videos makes them interesting to watch, as well as masturbate to. I'm not saying it's story over form, but since femdom relies so heavily on dialogue and non-sexual actions, as well as the hardcore porn elements, it is an extremely welcome bonus to actually see videos like these.
If you are really into femdom/cuckold niche then this site is a must try. Those of you who are just curious about it would be better off with sites that offer a wider variety of fetishes. As far as a specific, niche, fetish site goes, this is hands down one of the better ones I have seen. If they last I would expect to see them in the ranks of Cuckold Cream and the likes, or even kink.com material. |
|
03-26-12 03:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
69
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
wildbillnj1975's Comment
Yes, this was major issue with this site. I wasn't a huge fan of the update methods either. basically you got a different angle of some mad sex party every day. These are some of the annoying aspects of Tainster.
|
06-11-12 11:26pm
|
Review
70
|
Tainster
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fairly massive content. There really is more here than you can download in a few months, so that is always a big plus.
The sites are all pretty self explanatory. What you get with these is about 3 different party/orgy/swinging sites, and 1 that is softcore. It's about the same for pissing and WAM. A couple of fetish sites geared towards satin and hose, and 1 really good bdsm/femdom site.
The quality of all the videos content-wise is top notch. It's mostly Russian/Ukraine, and the models are absolutely fabulous.
The video quality itself is what you expect; older videos are not going to be as good as newer. They usually give you at least three options, with some of the newer videos being 720/1080 HD, and over 1gb in size.
The free live webcam performances are pretty good too. You also get access to the photos, which are usually screen caps of the videos, but there is also a pic post section.
Download speeds are well within reason. Can pretty much max out 2.5/sec dl speed. |
| Cons: |
There is a pop-up box when you click to download a video which is always set on the lowest format, has to be changed, then has to be right-clicked to get it to save to my download manager.
There updates often consist of about 75% party videos from a different camera. They usually release them in blocks of 2-5, for three different cameras. |
| Bottom Line: |
Tainster has really made a name for themselves and I was certainly pleased when I became a member. There is way more to see here than you will ever have time for. Granted, some of it is just different camera angles of the same event, but HOLY COW those events. They deserve to get covered by three or more cameras. I like to play a fun little game called "Track the Girl" and see if you can spot the same girl in all the different cameras/angles.
For those of you looking for a well rounded fetish site go elsewhere. These sites will get you plenty of pissing,WAM, satin/secretary, some lesbo, some MF hardcore, some BDSM and femdom, but this from their one site Tyrannized (what a great name). Tyrannized does have some forced bi, cuckolding, strapon femdom, etc. And it is a damn good site.
The bottom line here is that you can join a network that is always adding content, and seldom fails to deliver good quality videos and photos. |
|
04-19-12 11:18pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
71
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Wow, thanks for pointing this out. I hate it when sites don't update. Fold them into an archive and lose the site if its dead.
|
04-19-12 10:10pm
|
Reply
72
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Nowhere near the quality layouts u get with video box. It is annoying because you don't get any sort of preview of the scene, just numbers that change the video playing in the window. Downloading their clips requires you to wait till the video loads too, which really slows down the whole process.
Get 1mo membership, you'll have plenty of time to get the whole decade u spoke of.
|
11-13-12 06:36am
|
Reply
73
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
She has plenty of legit movies, and they link to a few of her other movies where you can buy the DVD. When they list the star's catalog, anything they don't have sends you to a place you can buy their DVD releases.
|
11-13-12 06:31am
|
Review
74
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very cheap monthly fees.
- Tons of classic porn.
- Well known movies, they are generally films with big name stars.
- Have some films grouped by company or regions (French porn form the 1970s for example)
- Can search catalog by year.
- Fairly well managed database of stars, directors, year the film was made, and company that made them. It could be a little better, but this is probably the one thing they do right at this site.
- You also get access to a lot of Gay movies, all classics. Some really great porn mustaches. |
| Cons: |
- One of the worst site designs. Very clunky.
- They decided to put their Facebook and Google+ links right above the download links, so you are constantly have to close popups because they are activate by "mouse overs" whenever you try to click on the download links. This is probably the most annoying thing at their site.
- Half their movies are clipped into smaller files, the other half are just whole downloads. There is no consistency to this either, well except that if they clipped it everything just gets named ipod3g_##, so you constantly have to rename every clip you download (or end up with ipod3g_01 through ipod3g_100).
- They advertise films that are supposedly going to be offered soon, but often they never do (they get skipped over, can't be offered after all; I really don't know why).
- Quality is really hit or miss here. The year of the film doesn't really seem to affect this. Old and newer films are often very poor quality.
- No choice of downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a great site if you are looking for a cheap alternative to buying classic porn DVDs or more likely VHS in a lot of these cases. They have a ton of films here, but you may not always find the biggest ones here (or anywhere else for that matter). For example, they have a ton of Christy Canyon's movies, but only one Traci Lords. However, the quality of many of these movies is sub-par just from their origins in time, but at the same time the operators of this website really need to establish some degree of consistency. Occasionally they will post a movie that is almost unwatchable. One of the most annoying things, aside from their poor placement of Facebook links, are how badly they can mess a movie up clipping it. Having to rename half your downloads from this site is something I haven't had to deal with since the 1990s. They took the time to clip it, you are paying them to do so whether you wanted them to or not, the least they could do is title their videos properly. This little faux pas just makes them look as amateurish as their 1960s movies (of which there are only a handful). It is clear that they are just uploading films with no regard towards their customer's satisfaction.
My problem with this site is that after some time (1-2 months)you have probably downloaded everything you want to keep. So, you are enticed into staying because they have a movie you have been searching for "coming soon." Hopefully they actually offer it, but oftentimes the film just disappears out of the "coming soon" list. Then you add to it all the little annoyances like having to close the popups when you accidentally mouse over them, renaming your downloads, and all of this so that maybe you can get a movie or two that you actually want per week. After a few months I found myself going for days and days without downloading from this site. It really ticks you off when the download links don't work for the first few days they offer the movie too, which has happened about every third movie they upload it seems.
The bottom line is that if you are looking for a site with a ton of classic porn, then this is probably the only one worth trying. I recommend it as a one time, one month membership. Get in there and get what you want and get out. They don't seem to care about the problems with their site (post suggestions all you want via their "suggestion box," I am pretty sure nobody reads them). The quality is hit or miss, and you won't really know until you download it. And like many sites these days, if you are using a Download manager you will have about thirty minutes before you will have to refresh the links. Fortunately their largest file sizes are still less than 500mb, so this is only a problem if you are trying to download half a decade worth of movies at a time. They are a good source for classic porn, but until they start addressing some of these issues I wouldn't recommend any long term memberships with them. The only reason they score a 70 is because they do have an impressive catalog, but that is about all they have going for them. What is sad is that their most impressive aspect has nothing to do with the site itself, just the access it provides to all those movies. There biggest problems are horrible mistakes made by web designers and management. As soon as any other company comes along offering this niche, this site will get trounced into oblivion. I have personally emailed Videobox requesting that they at least create an additional, retro site. I would rather pay Videobox and extra $15/mo than to keep paying these guys. |
|
11-12-12 09:36am
Replies (11)
|
Reply
75
|
VCA XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Videobox does have a classics section, but it is mostly 1990s stuff.
I think a lot of sites stay away from them because the video quality is so bad they think people won't want them. Some of the more popular stars like Marilyn Chambers or Traci Lords might see their stuff remastered, but I doubt much effort will be spent on old porn.
|
05-07-12 10:22am
|
|
