Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
The ladies I mentioned aren't porn stars.
|
12-12-07 04:40am
|
Reply
502
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Evelyn Lory, Eve Angel, Sophie Moon would be examples of Glamour models.
|
12-12-07 04:32am
|
Comment
503
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
|
12-11-07 09:27pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
504
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Comment
gloryhole.com has over 300 videos. It costs too much, but how many gloryhole vids can a person watch?
|
06-22-09 03:19pm
|
Review
505
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Over 300 Videos To Date
-NO DRM
-Hi-Res Photos (Newer)
-Zip Files
-13 Bonus Sites
-Out Of Sight Male "Talent" |
Cons: |
-Expensive
-Redundant (see bottom line) |
Bottom Line: |
The notion of girls going into dirty bathrooms and fellating strange men through "gloryholes" (a hole cut into a wall that allows a man to foolishly insert his member without knowing whether or not the person on the other side has a sharp knife)is dumb, but what of it? It's only porn. Don't try this in real life, because it will be a guy on the other side of the wall every time.
Anyway, it's interesting to see how the girls react to this fantasy situation. Some of them think it's goofy. Others think it's really dirty (which it is). Then there are those such as Bree Olson who reveal themselves to be depraved cocksuckers. Bree really gets into it, as do many others of the varied stable. So does Missy Monroe, Julia Bond, Sasha Grey, Bobbi Starr, Veronica Jett and a lot of others I am not familiar with. A lot of people wonder how females can do porno, and this site shows why in a stark manner---they like the controlled, "safe" sexual situations. They are coached into it by the cameraman/director. It's amazing what some girls will do. Some of them can't stand it and mount in contorted positioning.
The redundancy I mentioned is not in the niche, but in the scene setup. It's always exactly the same, with a different girl. But there's a lot of it. The site's been online for over 5 years, naturally the quality improves over time. The videos are only available in wmv, you can download them full length or in bits. They are 640x360. The ancient ones are in mpeg divided into 10 parts (dialup); there aren't many of those, but there are some interesting girls way back there, so you may want to go through all 52 pages.
The photos for the recent sets are good--1600px and are zipped. I'm getting excellent download speed here (+1MB/s).
There are 13 extra sites, including another gloryhole site. Blacks on Blondes (which doesn't really stick to the theme) has a lot of excellent offerings.
I avoided this site for a long time, mainly because of the price. But I'm frickin' sick and tired of watching stunt cocks ruin scene after scene so having them behind a wall works real well! BTW, all the girls are white, and all the anonymous peckers are black if that means anything to you. I'm guessing this is pornoville's way of making it even dirtier, that's the way they think of you. But none of this is about intelligence, is it? It's about blowjobs! |
|
06-20-09 08:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
506
|
Glossy Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
If you look on the 2nd or 3rd page there is a girl named "Mina" that is a set from W4B.
|
08-15-07 07:00pm
|
Reply
507
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Bacchus's Comment
The shill problem was solved, if you read the comments in that section. And we don't seem to get them much anymore, so I guess the TBP plan was a success.
|
11-01-07 07:46pm
|
Comment
508
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
|
07-15-07 05:20pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
509
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
TeFloN's Review
Thanks for knocking the artifically high score back to earth a bit!
|
06-25-07 12:36am
|
Reply
510
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
I can't remember if the videos are offered in different sizes.
|
11-14-09 11:32am
|
Reply
511
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Sorry it took so long to answer.
They do, but being a softcore site, it isn't as prevalent.
|
11-14-09 11:31am
|
Reply
512
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Let me take a look...
The photos are 1280x960
The videos 640x480 about 5000 kbps.
Yes, the photos are zipped, they may come in 2 or 3 zips per set, I can't remember if it was only the older ones or not.
|
11-08-09 04:03am
|
Reply
513
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
It's been a while since I was a member (I didn't know it was listed here until today), but I'll try to answer any question you have.
They have a ton of gorgeous models, but as I wrote, you're not going to see even half of them your first month there. If it weren't such a high quality site, I would just dismiss it.
|
11-08-09 03:46am
|
Comment
514
|
Graphis
(0)
|
|
11-08-09 03:22am
Replies (14)
|
Reply
515
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Reply
Is this a new feature? Let's see... Eve Angel, Teen Dreams, yup it works!
|
10-30-07 10:13pm
|
Reply
516
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Look, when I wrote Christy Canyon, it turned into a link! it seems she has a site.
|
10-30-07 01:39pm
|
Reply
517
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
I don't know, but Christy Canyon's jiggling breasts are a good selling point to start! Thanks for bringing this site to our attention, it has a trial option I may give it a try.
|
10-30-07 01:38pm
|
Reply
518
|
Hand Domination
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks, I depend upon the reviews here too.
|
12-15-07 02:11am
|
Reply
519
|
Hand Domination
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Yes, you are correct sir.
|
12-15-07 02:08am
|
Review
520
|
Hand Domination
(0)
77.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- The Men Don't Play With Themselves
- Hi-Res Videos
- NO DRM
- Screencaps |
Cons: |
- The Cameraman Talks...And Talks...And Talks
- No Photo Sets
- Not A Lot Of Content Yet
- Some Poor Acting |
Bottom Line: |
"All of our handjob movies have long post orgasm milkings; these girls don't stop until they drain your cock completely dry! You will NEVER see any guys finish themselves off. Our girls dominate these defenseless cocks from start to finish." That's the enticing description from the site, and it is an honest one. A lot of the guys are actually tied up, so they can't disgust us by stroking themselves even if they wanted to (and you know they do, but the girls won't let them at any rate.). The premise of the site is women in sexual control. When done well, it is very erotic, and there are some well done vids here. There are some problems however: In many of the scenes, the cameraman jabbers away! I've asked this before---why do these guys imagine that we are interested in hearing anything they have to say? Sometimes it's so distracting that I had to hit the mute button, which minimalizes the effect. If you have to direct the girl, do it off camera. And please don't chat. What a turn off. Some of the girls can't act very well either. However, there are some good scenes where the guy is tortured by the forced "milking" and denial, and slapping and so forth. I almost feel sorry for them! And give the site credit for keeping the guys under control, they never get in the way of the scene. The site updates once a week, and has about 25 vids so far, all at 720x480, no DRM. They come with a lot of screencaps, but with no regular photos. Please Mr. Cameraman...shhhhhhhh! |
|
12-14-07 12:18am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
521
|
Handjob Spectacles
(0)
|
Reply of
pissedatporn's Reply
No, I was referring to your previous username!
|
01-11-09 09:18am
|
Reply
522
|
Handjob Spectacles
(0)
|
Reply of
pissedatporn's Comment
Where have I heard this before?!
|
01-11-09 12:54am
|
Reply
523
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick88's Comment
The ownership was changed, and it hasn't been the same.
|
05-20-09 12:45am
|
Reply
524
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Good review.
They do mix and match their sets among the sites. One super site would be best, it would be a killer site.
|
05-02-08 05:06am
|
Review
525
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files
- 4 Video Options Including HD
- Lots Of Exclusive Material
- Handy Index Of Hot Models - Niche Index
- Updated Daily |
Cons: |
- Expensive
- Some Of The Updates Are Republished Material |
Bottom Line: |
FFM, MMF, B/G, Anal "Sex", Gang Bang etc. HOHC is a library of XXX hardcore photos and videos. A true photo site, and a true video site wrapped in one, this premium site does charge a premium price. The photos are available in 3 sizes, up to 2000px. They look fabulous, well photographed, well posed, the models very attractive and made up. These can be downloaded in zip files. The DDF photos have a style that is distinguishable from other sites. The videos are also high quality, available in 4 formats: Streaming flash (720 x 405), HD wmv (1280 x 720), with a smaller size, HD divx (1280 x 720), quicktime (960 x 540) and the ol' mpeg (448 x 256). The HD files are huge in size. If you want to D/L them all (and you may) you will have to make arrangements to store them. The model index is easy to use, with listings of all sets for everyone, with a chance to rate the girls. Niches are also indexed, as are the updates. I have noticed that some updates are sets that have previously been published, since I have been a member before, but I do notice that the videos of these sets have been updated. There is a wealth of exclusive porn here that other sites are hard pressed to match in quantity and quality. All in the DDF style. |
|
12-25-07 06:01pm
Replies (0)
|