Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LarryL's Reply
As you can see, the staff of this site doesn't agree with you. I find your hostile, foul mouthed reply very telling.
|
08-12-07 04:35pm
|
Reply
652
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LarryL's Reply
3 insanely high scores on an extremely average site in a matter of a few hours by newbies----how stupid do you think we are shill???
|
08-11-07 05:41am
|
Reply
653
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LarryL's Reply
We need to get rid of you shills, and i will personally be watching these reviews, you can bet on that. You're no better than a spammer.
|
08-10-07 06:29pm
|
Reply
654
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I depend upon this site for honest reviewing. It would be a shame if shills found a comfortable home here.
|
08-10-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
655
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LarryL's Reply
Thanks for the fair and balanced review----not!
|
08-08-07 07:14pm
|
Comment
656
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
|
08-08-07 07:13pm
Replies (14)
|
Rating
657
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
71.0
|
No Review.
|
08-07-07 09:20pm
|
Comment
658
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
|
08-31-07 11:10pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
659
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Maybe we should change the phrase from "shilling" to "payola"!
|
09-02-07 06:01pm
|
Reply
660
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
So, can we be expecting some "100% can't think of any negatives" reviews to be popping up here soon?
|
08-29-07 07:24pm
|
Reply
661
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
A total pet peeve of mine as well!
|
08-02-07 07:15pm
|
Comment
662
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
|
03-30-08 06:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
663
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
brixze's Comment
These sites are their own worst enemies---when will they learn that good customer service means repeat membership. Thanks for the warning, I'll skip this one.
|
07-06-07 12:26am
|
Reply
664
|
Mandingo X Rated
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
Hold on...TBP Is doing a review very soon, you may want to wait.
|
05-02-08 05:04am
|
Reply
665
|
Mandingo X Rated
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
WCP is a reputable production company. Maybe the sites are fairly new and that's why you see no reviews.
|
05-01-08 12:14pm
|
Reply
666
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
We must always get on their case for no zip files and if they have DRM. They will listen to us!
|
02-25-09 08:41am
|
Reply
667
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
I never get tired of POV myself. I hate the stunt dicks (as they call them here) they should have their hands tied behind their backs, mouths taped shut, and a bag over their head as far as I'm concerned! But that's me, and this is a niche site that caters to this. So I see it as a positive.
No zip files is inexusable. Thanks for getting on their case, all these sites need zip files.
The model search here is a mess. They need to upgrade the look of their site.
|
02-25-09 08:40am
|
Review
668
|
Mano Job
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Well Produced Scenes
Stays On Topic
Hi Res Photos
Large Archive
Interactive Forum
Good Extra Site
Screen Caps
Exclusive Material
NO DRM |
Cons: |
No Zip Files :(
Older Scenes/Less Appealing
Hassle To Enter Extra Site
Could Be Updated More Frequently
Needs Improved Navigation |
Bottom Line: |
This is the best HJ site out there, mostly because they do it right. It stays on topic and doesn't stray from the niche, which a lot of niche sites do, to my great annoyance. The producer and director here make a real effort to do it right. They are aware of one of the real problems in western porn, especially with niches like this: the "stunt dicks" (their term!) often ruin scenes in niches like this. We don't want to see the male props giving themselves handjobs! This site tries their best to avoid this spectacle, although sometimes it's a losing battle, through no fault of their own. And---importantly---they understand that the viewer does not desire to hear the director talking. You don't get that here, and high marks to them for that. You can discuss these and other issues with them in their forum. All sites should have a forum.
The videos are 640x480 (wmv). As of this writing, there are 297 of them. They are well produced. You can download them whole, in small parts, or in very small parts. Each scene also includes a slow motion climax, and a behind the scenes video. The oldest videos have some not very appealing girls in them, but generally the latest updates are just fine. You get screencaps with every scene.
The photos are 1500px, and very well photographed. However---no zip files! Come on guys, get those zip files up! Photos are not a side attraction, lots of us like them better than the vids. No excuse for not having zip files in this day and age.
There are 2 extra sites, the "Dicksuckers" being tha main attraction. It isn't real easy getting there though, and you have to sign in again when you do. That should be fixed. But it also is a good site, and mirrors Mano technically, with a lot of the same girls (obviously they do 2 separate scenes for the site).
You can bookmark your favorite scenes, which is handy (all sites should have this feature), but the site's navigation needs some work. Could be more user friendly and attractive, they have a model listing that is a bit of a mess.
I like niches like HJ/BJ, and when it's done properly (as this site is) it's unique in the online porn world. The site gets a high mark primarily for not disappointing in this regard, and for the fact they make a conscious effort to please the paying customer. And it's apparent that the site keeps improving. Hand Job niche lovers will not be disappointed. |
|
02-25-09 08:01am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
669
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
They have good photos there though. And a good bonus site with "The Dicksuckers".
However, as hard as they try, they still have trouble controlling the males.
|
02-08-09 06:43am
|
Reply
670
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Thanks Denner, I joined this site on your recommendation and have not been disappointed. I think you forgot a con though---no zip files. And you're right about the navigation needing a lot of improvement.
But it's a good site.
|
02-07-09 07:36am
|
Reply
671
|
Marina Mendoza
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm not getting a popup using Opera.
|
01-18-08 01:07pm
|
Reply
672
|
Masturbation Page
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Sometimes a chargeback is the only language some of these sites will understand.
|
10-11-07 11:24pm
|
Reply
673
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Douggie's Comment
i was going to join this site until I read the webmaster's comments here. Seems he needs a lesson in how to treat the paying customer LOL
|
10-18-07 12:55am
|
Reply
674
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I always compare the webmasters to the guy at Babelicious. He appreciates the paying customer.
|
09-22-07 07:22pm
|
Reply
675
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You can see his reply to "Ragingbuddhist" right here at PU. I don't need to be giving my money to someone who treats the paying customer like sh1t.This old school porn business attitude of "you'll take it and like it" is pathetic. It's no wonder that porn sites are so hit and miss.
|
09-22-07 06:39pm
|