| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
851
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Reply
I don't even consider this a real site.
|
04-04-08 06:30pm
|
Reply
852
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'm sorry I should make this clear---I consider DRM to be spyware. That is when you play one of those videos, the DRM is being used to restrict individuals' use of their own copies of published works. To enforce these restrictions, DRM software must monitor and control a computer users' behavior. Frequently it reports on what it sees. That's by definition spyware. This is why these sites must be boycotted, given an automatic 20 points off in reviews, and brought to the attention of everyone. These sites must be made to suffer financially, even to the point of ruin. This site, Private, which produces quality porn, has for years overcharged on their product. They were one of the first companies to go online. But they do not deliver for the money. Imagine going to a bookstore and buying a book and taking it home to read it. But to open it, you must call the bookstore, and get their permission!
|
12-08-07 03:14pm
|
Comment
853
|
Private.com
(0)
|
|
12-08-07 04:45am
Replies (6)
|
Rating
854
|
Private.com
(0)
65.0
|
No Review.
|
08-31-07 08:54pm
|
Reply
855
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
wally's Reply
To tell the truth, I have not seen a single POV site that understands the concept. It's always the same thing: they aren't smart enough to understand that the male in the video
Should never talk
Should never touch the girl
Should never touch himself
Should never have his face shown
And the girl should always be acting toward the person viewing the video.
But the people who make these things don't understand this. .
The only sites I could suggest to you belive it or not, are Jsexnetwork and actionjav. They're not POV sites per se, but the Japanese understand what POV is, and a great deal of their videos have POV. They even have POV kissing! They use glass to do this. And the girls are always acting toward the viewer.
Other than that, there are no true POV sites out there.
|
04-24-08 11:27pm
|
Reply
856
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
PerfectGonzo's Reply
I have an idea. Keep the microphone away from the director.
|
12-24-07 12:07pm
|
Comment
857
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
|
09-07-07 10:47pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
858
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
lespaul76's Reply
Another guy who makes proper POV's is the guy at 3rd Degree who does the "Hand To Mouth" series, I can't remember his name, but you can see them at the site. POV is supposed to be the girl performing and talking to the viewer.
|
08-03-07 02:30am
|
Reply
859
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Comment
The only thing I would say is that since POV means the girl is pretending to be with the viewer, the cameraman ought to keep his mouth shut. I can see this one doesn't, so the whole effect is spoiled.
|
07-05-07 08:14pm
|
Reply
860
|
Purrfect Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
As I recall, lots of non nudity here. I still have lots of sets of clothing, but it was a long time ago so I can't speak to what's in there now.
Nice looking girl though.
|
06-25-09 12:06pm
|
Reply
861
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Probably someone hacked into the site and left a little script. You see it on myspace all the time. But your software caught it. I'm sure the Aziani site has probably removed it by now.
|
04-01-09 07:25pm
|
Reply
862
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
That's what you deserve for going to the Euro!
Just a joke!
|
11-28-09 11:25pm
|
Reply
863
|
Real Indian Sluts
(0)
|
Reply of
bbiillyy's Review
LOL I think your review knocked them right off line because their server is down!
|
10-30-07 01:32am
|
Reply
864
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
I don't have the time to download 10 gigs in a single day!
|
06-05-09 01:00am
|
Reply
865
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Lews Therin's News
You still couldn't get in? Then they deserve a 50.
|
10-02-07 03:19am
|
Review
866
|
Retro Raunch
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Unusual Vintage Material
- Easy Navigation
- No DRM Protection |
| Cons: |
- Small Photos
- No Zip Files
- Very Low-Res Videos
- Not Much Material |
| Bottom Line: |
For those interested in Vintage pornography, this site may interest you. However, I have seen much better material than I see here. This site provides photos and videos (films actually). The material ranges from pre-1920's-1970's. I wouldn't expect the films to be in great shape of course, and that's OK, but the videos are tiny Quicktimes and most of them are silent. They are downloadable. Hard and softcore is available. A lot of old stag movies, which is interesting, but the quality varies, some very poor due to age. You will also find burlesque shorts here, but with no musical soundtrack, by that I mean a modern soundtrack which you will see elsewhere. There are a few Bettie Page films as well, and also some bondage which was interesting. Grandpa was kinky! The photos are OK, nothing approaching hi-res, and due to age the quality varies. Hardcore, Fetish,"Cheesecake" and Gay are the categories here. I find some of the old stuff very erotic, sometimes weird. Of course, you'll see plenty of black socks and even masks during sex! They also have a novelty section with such items as dirty playing cards, and "Tijuana Bibles" which are unusual. Good collector's items. The price isn't bad, and there is some interesting material to save for antique collectors who get bored by the mechanical productions of today, but I have seen much better material out there than is displayed here. |
|
10-22-07 08:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
867
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I think I can still reply to this from here.
Let us know when it returns.
|
05-01-08 11:56am
|
Reply
868
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
It hasn't yet closed down? You got that mail a month ago.
|
05-01-08 04:54am
|
Reply
869
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Sounds like trying to download a site using dialup---no fun. Hopefully they will address the problem.
|
03-28-08 12:45pm
|
Reply
870
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
No zips? Good grief! No zips+slow server=No Way! Did you just join today?
|
03-27-08 07:46pm
|
Reply
871
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Hey Drooler, please keep me informed, I was wanting to join this site. Maybe it's a blip on the radar.
|
03-27-08 01:02pm
|
Reply
872
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I can't. I never got in the site!
|
12-03-09 12:26pm
|
Comment
873
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
|
12-03-09 01:02am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
874
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This is strange but it still happens...but only when I use Opera browser (which I usually use). When I use IE or Firefox on your link, no problem. ??
You may as well delete this whole comment.
|
06-04-09 01:26am
|
Reply
875
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I'm getting this site from clicking the icon:
http://www.yourworstenemy.com/
it's one of those generic sites??
|
05-28-09 02:40pm
|
