| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I am deeply saddened that your results with Wet and Pissy, were not as good as mine with Wet and Puffy. I had tried my best, it was my first review, to be as accurate as I could at the time that I wrote my review. I had joined Wet and Puffy, and was able to access all three of their sites. Yes, I did have to sign into each one separately, if I remember correctly, but I did access all three, and was happy with my results.
I see that after 7 comments you were able to resolve your issues with the web host and it appears that things have been worked out. That is good, and I hope long term that you are not upset with my having given what I believed then, and still believe was my honest opinion of the Wet and Puffy site.
|
12-19-12 08:33pm
|
Reply
27
|
CreamPie.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Very informative review, thanks for going into sufficient detail that one can really use the information.
|
12-06-12 04:20pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
20 TB ! Wow, I thought I had collected a bunch and I'm just under one TB. I may have to go buy another external disk drive, but then I would have to organize my collection, and that would seem too much like work.
|
12-05-12 12:02am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My collection of porn, is currently growing more in the video area, although for years, I went mostly for photos. As the quality of video has improved in the last couple years I have gone more that way, although I still very much enjoy, and often go back to look at, photos.
|
12-04-12 11:59pm
|
Reply
30
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This pretty much echos my thoughts on FTV. I had a membership about 2 years ago, and found some very nice videos, etc, but felt that there was just too much repetition of the scenes and I lost interest. It's too bad, because at first I was really enthusiastic about the site. Don't think I would spend the $ to "re-up" unless there was a significant discount. But it might be fun to take one more look, I will have to give it some thought.
|
12-04-12 11:46pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Talking by the camera person may be good or bad depending on the situation, a bit of chat about the model can sometimes help the video. It probably shouldn't overshadow the whole scene, but if it can enhance and help to draw one in or set the scene, then it is good.
|
11-20-12 03:59am
|
Reply
32
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks to both Slutty & Lk2fireone for your comments and especially for the suggestion of the DownThenAll download manager. I have tried it, and well, lo and behold it appears to work. :)
It did mean a need to switch from using Chrome to Firefox but that was not a very big deal, as I often use both of them anyway.
I appreciate very much that I got good advice here on that. Again, to me that is what a site like this is, or at least should be, all about. Users assisting other users.
Fizzy
|
11-06-12 10:39am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Yes! I too use a word processor for my initial building of a review. It usually takes me 3 or 4 days to write everything, even though they are short reviews. I need to think about what I want to say, and then I need to remember more before I post.
But I always find that I need to edit my thoughts all the way to the final point of posting.
|
11-04-12 10:22am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nice to see that 100% of poll respondees chose the same answer that I did.
Oh wait, look, I am the only one who took the poll :(
|
11-04-12 12:15am
|
Reply
35
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Met-Art is on my list of sites to try someday. I just can't try all sites at one time. So many good sites, so little time to really enjoy.
Anyway, my thoughts go to your suggestions for a photo naming convention. I fully agree that the model's name should be the first part of the photo name! Then some intermediate data, your suggestion of the date is excellent, or possibly a short description of the set, and finally ending with a photo number within the set.
Now if only more sites would use a longer name, or a convention like this, rather than renumbering all photos to 001, 002, 003, etc within each downloaded, system generated zip file.
|
11-04-12 12:11am
|
Reply
36
|
Kissak
(0)
|
Reply of
rocz's Review
Thanks for the warning. This is one of the reasons one comes to Porn Users. Not just to find good sites, but also to be "warned away" from bad ones.
|
11-03-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
37
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Maybe, since I was a newbie at this site, I didn't focus as much on the volume of updates. And since my subscription was to 21Sextreme only, not to 21Sextury, I did not realize that their other site (suite of sites) was updated more frequently.
In any case, as I found that I was not enjoying the site, nor its content, the rate of updating did not seem particularly important to me.
I will however keep your concerns about updating somewhere in the back of my mind, and hopefully remember it in any future reviews that I may write.
Thanks for your comments, it is only by constructive comments that my reviews will improve with time.
|
10-20-12 01:51am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
The question here in this poll, as one notices lately also with political polls, is "what is the polling methodology, and how are the questions asked?".
The methodology here, is to ask members to respond, that requires some effort on each members part so is somewhat limiting on who will participate, only those of us who want to contribute will answer.
And then there is the measurement issue, of how to decide what it means to "stay over one year", is that to "never use your login id again for a year"? The site, if it keeps records of a user's last login, could track how many users have a last login date over one year old, and compare that to the total number of users. But even that can be misleading, as it would probably be best to limit the total user count to those where their initial sign up date was more than a year in the past, it certainly would not be valid to count someone like me who only signed up a bit over a month ago.
Come back in a year from now to see if I stay active.
|
09-30-12 10:26pm
|
Reply
39
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
About the related sites:
wetandpissy.com
and
weliketosuck.com
I was able to access each of them. I needed to re-key my user id and password for each site, but both did let me access them. I downloaded video from each of them, but found the weliketosuck less interesting than the wet and pissy. Of course that is based on my interests and desire to see pee videos. I found the sucking ones just somewhat boring.
This comment added 3 weeks after I signed up for Wet and Puffy . . . I have since downloaded many videos from both wet and puffy and wet and pissy. I have canceled re-bills, as I have as many videos as I found interesting downloaded, and see no need to continue to pay for the few additional that may be added over the course of a month, although I may come back in a year or so for more.
Overall, it was a good site (sites) for pissing videos, which is what I wanted. I realizethat this is a niche market, and that I fall into that small group who want to see peeing, but for us it is good clear pee video with lots of close ups. For others, it would certainly be a waste of hard earned money.
|
09-10-12 08:40pm
|
Reply
40
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks for your comments. Yes pissing is certainly a small niche market, but between the "wet and puffy" and their related "wet and pissy" site, you will see a bunch of it here. There is some of the drinking and pouring you mentioned, not in all cases, but maybe 10 to 20 % of the videos do include those things. What I like are the clear closeups of pissing, some with lips spread wide so you can really see it streaming (steaming) out.
And I also agree with you on the big taco and juicy cherry stuff. Maybe because SWMBO has a peachy pussy.
It certainly is mostly a solo site, there are a few lesbian vids, and even a few where a guy is in there, but these (from what I have seen) are few and far between.
|
08-31-12 04:35pm
|
Reply
41
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Ya know, I'm new at reviewing sites, at least at writing down my reviews. Been reviewing in my head for ages. I will try to watch for internal inconsistencies like this more carefully in the future. I agree "many" would probably have been a better choice of words.
Anyway I was more interested in the pissing than the toys. Have always liked watching girls pee. Don't know why, and have long since given up on trying to figure it out.
Thanks for your comments, I will try to improve my internal consistancies.
|
08-26-12 02:13pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
sorry to say, but I have to second that last comment.
|
08-19-12 04:32pm
|
Reply
43
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Norberto's Comment
I have had access to AW for a month at a time a couple of times. And agree that I liked it better when it was in OZ. But a few of the girls from Europe were to my liking (Gretchen comes to mind).
Not a member right now but will probably go back to see if has gotten better or worse since my last membership. If worse, well that will be my last time. Although, I really do like there "Double Intimate Momemnts", I love watching the girls watch each other masturbate.
|
08-19-12 06:25am
|
|
