Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
wow what a pleasant surprise. Thanks for making the changes and doing it so quickly!!
|
02-19-18 06:23am
|
Comment
2
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
|
02-14-18 09:44am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
3
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
04-27-17 06:50am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
4
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
drax444's Comment
Are all contents from other ATK sites exclusive to the respective sites?
|
10-24-16 08:07am
|
Reply
5
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
clubseventeen's Reply
It does. Thank you!
|
08-12-16 07:02am
|
Reply
6
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
clubseventeen's Reply
Thank your the the reply Ronald. I understand the cost issue and am not against it. However, it does create a problem when downloading contents - I already have subscriptions to other sites that buy from the same producer, and already have the 60% you spoke of. It would be much easier if exclusive contents are somehow labeled.
My question was actually during which period did you have 100% exclusive content? I can start with those and not have to worry about redundant content.
|
08-11-16 10:17pm
|
Comment
7
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
|
08-07-16 12:32pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
8
|
Yonitale
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thank you RR.
I finally got to the end. There are 369 photo sets and 215 videos. 8 updates per click and it really slows down toward the earlier updates.
|
03-11-16 01:09pm
|
Review
9
|
Yonitale
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Attractive models, although the vast majority are familiar faces.
- Edgy style (lots of masturbation and light lesbian scenes)
- Good photography (but technically poor, see below)
- Daily updates |
Cons: |
- The worse ever navigation
- Picture qualities are surprisingly poor
- Relatively small site since it's new (launched at the end of 2014) |
Bottom Line: |
Per PU review instructions, 70 is in the range of "average", defined by "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend".
Models are good. Photographers are good. The people in charge of editing and web design must be FIRED. Let me explain:
===
Navigation:
The purpose of navigation, in my mind, is to get to a set as quickly and as easily as possible. Here's how it works at Yonitale: there are 8 updates on the update page, and a "load more" button at the bottom. When you click on it, 8 more updates are loaded into the same page. Click on the button again, and you get 8 more updates.
You guessed it! If you want to go to a gallery in 2014, that's 50+ clicks away.
Worse yet, it's not just the number of clicks. Because all updates are loaded into a single page, older updates are loaded significantly slower and it's eating up tons of memory. In the beginning it takes a few seconds to load 8 updates. By the time I got to mid 2015, it takes minutes to load every 8 updates.
Mind you, every time you log out or close the update window, you will have to start over from the beginning. I'm at May 2015 now, and my browser is using 2.21G memory.
NOTE TO THE WEB DESIGNER: YOUR JOB IS TO DESIGN A GOOD AND PRACTICAL INTERFACE FOR THE CUSTOMERS (ME), NOT A FANCY BUT SUPER SLOW ONE FOR YOURSELF.
======
FILES:
I'm a collector, and I imagine most members subscribing to this type of sites are as well. It really bothers me how Yonitale names their zip files - with a bunch of letters and numbers with absolutely no information about model, date, photographer, set name. Something like "gallery-489-4800-9f9379b6b1a23ea2066e98b301df5011.zip".
To be fair, some other sites don't include all the info in file names either. Two things: 1) the (arguably) industry leader in this category includes all such info in their zip file names (I won't have to name the site). 2) Why not? why make it harder for paying customer to get what they need?
======
PICTURE QUALITY
So let's say you clicked through all the updates, renamed all the files individually and manually, what do you get?
The average size of the highest resolution zip files, which typically contain ~50 pictures, is 28.5M. Maybe zip files are under 10M, practically the same size of a couple of jpgs from other similar sites.
Need I say more?
======
BOTTOM LINE:
I joined the site because all the well-down banners on other sites.
How the work from decent photographers with attractive models ended up being such a horrifically designed site with low quality pictures, I will never understand.
I will not renew unless they redo the site. |
|
03-11-16 09:54am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
10
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree as well. I've subscribed to dozens of sites but my money is not going to any streaming only sites.
|
02-01-16 02:21pm
|
Reply
11
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Thanks! That's good news.
|
09-15-15 09:57pm
|
Comment
12
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
|
09-15-15 01:44pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
13
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
|
08-12-15 02:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
14
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
caliman's Comment
Sorry to hear that. This site has been on my "really-want-to-join" list for a few years now but they just can't get their acts together. Is it just me or is there not even a link for "terms"?
|
07-21-15 12:33pm
|
Reply
15
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Ed Freiland's Reply
Got it.... the home page was improved so that non-members can't see updates. Makes perfect sense.
|
07-14-15 03:03pm
|
Reply
16
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Ed Freiland's Reply
So is the current landing page THE facelift, or is it temporary before the facelift?
|
07-08-15 08:06am
|
Reply
17
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Reply
Thanks for the replies ghosty and Divinx.
So potential customers have to either somehow tweak the URL themselves or be previous subscribers......wow
Look at their competitors. Everybody else has updates upfront with previews and sorted every which way you want...
|
07-08-15 08:05am
|
Reply
18
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Thanks LPee23. Guess I'll keep an eye on it. It's a shame coz they used to have probably the most/best content in euro sites.
|
07-02-15 07:45am
|
Comment
19
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
07-01-15 02:44pm
Replies (9)
|
Comment
20
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
|
05-27-15 01:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
21
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
The Captain's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to reply. You DID add value and I appreciate that.
My issue is that it's hard to keep track of which files we downloaded from one site so we don't download the same ones from another site.
I was a long-time member of Nubliles.net (had annual memberships) and already download some content before. There's basically no way for me to download contents only in the new sites without comparing every video to what I already have.
I actually think there's a simply solution: the videos in Nubiles-Porn.com are already annotated if they are from the other sites like Moms Teach Sex, Driver XXX, Petite HD Porn etc etc. You only have to add annotations to videos that are already in Nubiles.net
Basically, clearly annotating which videos are "exclusively" in Nubiles-Porn.com or PetiteHDPorn would solve all the problems.
|
05-22-15 09:24am
|
Comment
22
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
|
|
05-21-15 10:00am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
23
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
|
02-19-15 09:09am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
24
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
ghosty's Reply
Thanks. Renaming a bunch of files the same way is easy, but I was hoping to have model name, set name and date, etc in the file names, like many other sites.
|
10-10-14 01:51pm
|
Reply
25
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Vito's Comment
Thank you both very much. I like having at least model name in zip file names so I can (obviously) find sets easily after I download. It is going to be too much work to rename every file :(
|
10-07-14 06:21am
|