| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Excellent value with yearly option.
-Unlimited downloads.
-No DRM.
-Supports download managers (actually incourages use of them).
-Has great respect for models.
-Huge amount of models, all appear to be 18 and are extremely attractive.
-High definition videos.
-Multiple daily updates.
-Super quality pictures. |
| Cons: |
-Not that many videos.
-Browsing site can be slow (but downloads are fast).
-Some navigation issues (can be hard to find all of a certain models content). |
| Bottom Line: |
Firstly I'd like to say I'm not going to deduct anything from this site in terms of points or cons because it's a softcore site.
This is made clear by the tour and the name of the site, so anyone who joins Met-Art would be ill-informed if they expect hardcore content.
I joined Met-Art recently, for the first time ever; and based soley on the information available in the FAQ and tour, I took out a yearly membership ($99), and It's one of the best decisions I've ever made.
If you look at my reviews, you'll quickly notice I'm not one to use all caps in a sentence, but I'm going to make an exception here:
ALL THE MODELS ARE ABSOLUTELY STUNNING. THE BEST LOOKING TEENS YOU'LL FIND ON THE NET, PERIOD.
Whilst that was out of character, I needed to make it very clear. The people who run this website strive for quality. All of their content is superb. The photo sets are available in low, medium and high resolution to suit your download speed / hard disk capacity, but the high quality pictures are nothing short of spectacular, and they don't have any watermarks.
There are not as many videos on the site, perhaps around 400 at a guess, and not all of them are in high definition, but are all a pleasure to watch.
I'm now running out of space for this review, but this has to be my favourite site so far.
Heed the con's I noted and then Join this site.
I can't recommend it enough if you like beautiful teens and don't require hardcore content.
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! |
|
07-21-07 04:14pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
27
|
Mr Camel Toe
(0)
|
|
07-21-07 04:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
28
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
jastrength's Comment
I think the other guys in the bus can be funny at times, but I definately think that Bangbus would be a lot better if they weren't there.
Either have just the driver in the bus who's also in the porn, or have a different driver that's not really in the video after the girl get's in the bus.
It's quite a big turn off then they're laughing and talking in the background.
|
07-21-07 03:55pm
|
Reply
29
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Thrillhouse85's Review
Nice review of a very nice site!
I joined AW a while ago, and it's one of my favourite sites. I always had extremely fast downloads (1.2MB/s), but frequently found that browsing the site was incredibly slow.
I think at the time however, there was some talk of a DDOS attack that was directed towards AW on the forums, so that may have been the explanation, I'm not sure how it is now.
|
07-21-07 03:52pm
|
Comment
30
|
CD Girls
(0)
|
|
07-20-07 04:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd have to say that the majority of the reviews are very good and extremely well written.
For me, a good review is one that is fairly detailed, clearly outlines the pro's and con's of the said site and makes a logical, well-informed conclusion.
Also, it's got to be written in good English.
There's a few reviews that seem to be written in "SMS talk" which I personally find annoying to read.
|
07-20-07 04:30pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely.
Though I burn DVDs rather than CDs, I download around 200GB worth of content which I keep on the HDD, then I spend like a day archiving this all on DVDs, delete it off the HDD except for my absolute favourite videos/pictures and start again!
|
07-18-07 12:12am
|
Reply
33
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yes!
I joined MET for a year yesterday. Initial impressions are extremely positive. Whilst it's softcore, which I expected the models are all beautiful.
I'm yet to see one with a poor complexion!
I'll be adding a nice review for MET in the coming weeks after I've been a member for a bit.
|
07-18-07 12:10am
|
Reply
34
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks very much for the info!
It's great to know the video quality is good.
The dilemma I face is I'm either joining MET Art or Abby Winters for one year today. I just can't decide which.
Heh.
|
07-17-07 12:18am
|
Comment
35
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
07-16-07 08:59am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
36
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
bjorn7's Comment
Discount is still available for me also, just tried.
Try clearing out all your temporary Internet clutter and retry.
|
07-16-07 03:47am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Same as pr0n addict, I always type in the URLs.
I find it faster.
|
07-16-07 03:43am
|
Reply
38
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thank you for the information Monahan :D
It sounds really good. Even the old Videobox site was superb so it's great to know they're improving it further.
Last time I was a member, there was no mention of the new site - I may join for another month soon though, so will be able to check out the benefits first hand.
The incorporation of a flash player is certainly a very welcome addition!
|
07-15-07 02:52pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Very much so.
I LOVE HD content. I can't wait until it's mainstream and all new porn videos are in HD.
It'll take a while for the collections to grow though, but by that time HDDs will be big enough to cope with my downloading habits.
|
07-14-07 11:24am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
After joining a site for a month, the very next second after joining I usually cancel the rebill so I don't have to think about it and remember to do it later.
However after using the site for a while, I might decide to reinstate the rebill of the site's quality warrants this, in which case I do.
|
07-14-07 11:22am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Absolutely not.
I won't join any site that uses DRM by principle. I'm a collector. I download large amounts of video and archive it on DVD. So DRM basically makes this a waste of time as viewing after the subscription has elapsed would not be possible.
|
07-14-07 11:21am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Definately high quality video downloads.
I don't tend to bother with pictures. I usually download them, but rarely view.
Video is just so much better, and sound adds to the whole experience.
For me, the only advantage photos have over videos is the ability to zoom in very far at certain bits.
You can't beat HD video though.
|
07-14-07 11:19am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes.
I use GetRight, I know it's not free, but it's a program that I've used for years and can't bring myself to use a different one.
It's great when using with sites like Videobox - I wouldn't be without it.
|
07-14-07 11:17am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
If it's a site I'd joined before, and knew was quality, then the most appealing price for me would be:
$60 for 1 year, one-time.
The site would have to have lots of content and frequent updates though.
However if I was joining a new site, then I'd opt for:
$20 for 1 month, recurring.
I'd cancel the rebill immediately after joining so I don't have to worry about forgetting it and evaluate the site whilst using it.
If it was worthy, then I'd reinstate my rebill or maybe cancel and rejoin for a longer period at a better price per month.
|
07-14-07 11:16am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not all that often I have to say.
I normally download virtually everything available on the site. Say I downloaded 100 videos, I might have 5 favourites. I'll just repeatedly view these and pretty much ignore the other 95.
Strange, but I'd still download them.
So I guess I'd say Once in a While.
|
07-14-07 11:13am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hmmm.
As things are at the moment, with HD videos not being the norm, perhaps HD 1080i videos do justify a higher membership due to the much increased server storage and bandwidth required.
But I think that a site that doesn't offer HD videos, but offers the file in various formats such as WMV/RM/MOV shouldn't have an increased price because of this.
|
07-14-07 11:12am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always.
I'd never join a site having not extensively researched it and read reviews.
I think porn sites are something that a lot of shady-sites will exist for, so caution should be exercised before joining.
TBP certainly helps.
|
07-14-07 11:10am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, it's too risky.
I wait till I get home!
|
07-14-07 11:09am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, I've recommended both.
They're both excellent and deserve to be recommended.
|
07-14-07 11:08am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No,
I wouldn't join a site that had any download limits in the first place.
Charging more to avoid any limits seems a bit greedy anyway.
Each sites going to have users who download lots, and those who don't download as much. So it generally evens out.
|
07-14-07 11:08am
|
