| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, it's too risky.
I wait till I get home!
|
07-14-07 11:09am
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, I've recommended both.
They're both excellent and deserve to be recommended.
|
07-14-07 11:08am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No,
I wouldn't join a site that had any download limits in the first place.
Charging more to avoid any limits seems a bit greedy anyway.
Each sites going to have users who download lots, and those who don't download as much. So it generally evens out.
|
07-14-07 11:08am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I'm not into MILFs at all, so for me it's hard to say. I guess it's fact that alot of more "mature" women look better thesedays, and, well the woman next door to me (35?) is quite hot, so I guess I can see why people like it.
|
07-14-07 11:06am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably general niche, broad coverage. This way the content is what I want, and there is usually a good amount of it available.
Having the content very specific would probably mean there is less content, and as long as it generally fits into the niche, then I'm happy.
|
07-14-07 11:03am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No.
I think porn would be the absolute last thing that would be on my mind to be honest!
|
07-14-07 11:00am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not yet, as long as I can fit some porn browsing in on a daily basis I won't need to.
Possibly if circumstances change though.
Like apoctom said, use of a good download manager helps big time, and is something that I often use for downloading lots overnight.
|
07-14-07 10:59am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Poll
Nothing to report yet, although that's probably because I decide what sites to join from reading reviews on TBP.
Occaisonly I've looked at reviews on other sites that I won't mention here, but they've also been reviewed on TBP.
|
07-14-07 10:57am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have once, but though how immoral it was afterwards.
Since, I haven't subscribed to any trial memberships anyway, but I think now, if I did subscribe to a trial membership and liked the content, I'd only download a bit and let the rebill occur after the trial expires before I started to download everything.
|
07-14-07 10:57am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, I do occaisonly.
It's nice to see more information on the person who's writing the review, and I guess I'm sometimes curious.
|
07-14-07 10:55am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No.
I guess because I'm too shy, and wouldn't like them to be found. :S
|
07-14-07 10:54am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Probably for the past 2 years.
I've been into porn for about the past 5, but only got my credit card a couple of years ago.
|
07-14-07 10:53am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
peepee's Poll
Huge breasts, as long as there's no stretch marks would be the biggest interest of mine in the HUGE category.
Second to that would be HUGE amout of videos to download! :)
|
07-14-07 10:52am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Either face, mouth or internal is the best for me I have to say.
|
07-14-07 10:51am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Heh, yes I guess that's true.
My CRT does have excellent picture quality, but it's just so damn bulky. It's got to be 6 years old now, and the rest of the PC equipment is only about 3 months old, so it looks really out of place.
I guess I'm just a sucker for new technology!
|
07-14-07 10:49am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Not usually.
Although if for some reason I'm not subscribed to a pay site, usually if I'm too poor that month then I do check a few out.
I'll be sure to look at your suggestions apoctom!
|
07-14-07 10:48am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
djwolf's Poll
Not all that often.
Usually because I join a site for a month and download everything I want within that month.
I might rejoin a few months down the line to update my downloads with the newer content.
Probably the only 2 site's I've let my monthly membership renew for is Videobox and Abby Winters.
|
07-14-07 10:47am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have to say they don't appeal to me.
I voted for waste of bandwidth, purely because I'd never browse one even if it was free.
Each to their own though.
|
07-14-07 10:45am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably only 10% or less.
I spend quite a while surfing the net, but only 10-20 mins surfing porn each day, usually at night.
Although this has increased since joining PU!
|
07-14-07 10:44am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
No.
I can't say it's something I'd probably do either.
|
07-14-07 10:41am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Nope I haven't.
I've thought about it a few times, but I don't know where I'd keep it, and the cleanup sounds like a real pain.
I'll still probably try one at some point though.
Shame I don't have anything to compare it to yet!
|
07-14-07 10:39am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I wouldn't say it's too restrictive. I'm usually able to fit in all the information I'd like for a fairly detailed review.
Only thing is, I sometimes like to insert a line break to separate different things I'm talking about, and sometimes find my self having to take these out.
|
07-14-07 10:38am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I can't say I have a favourite reviewer.
It's nice to have 4 different takes on a site, even though most of the time they're all of the same general consensus. By having more reviewers, there are usually more pros/cons listed.
Monahans post pretty much sums up my opinion.
|
07-14-07 10:36am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Yes I guess it does.
If I give someone a "No" vote because I feel that they've for example reviewed a site based only on the information avialable on the tour pages, and hasn't actually joined the site, they could give me a "No" vote simply because I gave them one.
Presumably this is something that should be avoided, as the "No" vote that they cast wasn't based on my reviews, but simply a response to my "No" vote for them.
By not allowing anonymous "No" votes, people have to provide a reason, but if the reasons were also approved by an admin, it could possibly avoid someone voting "No" for the reason that "You gave me a No vote!"
I'm not saying that the admin has to agree with the persons no vote, but there would probably be some completely un-called for No votes out of spite, that modering the votes could possibly avoid.
Hope that helps!
|
07-14-07 10:31am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, I think so.
Anonymous "Yes" votes are okay, but anyone who votes "No" should be required to provide a reason why. The reasons should also be moderated.
This would allow people to view why they got a no vote and possibly improve their reviews accordingly, and would reduce the chance of someone voting "No" just because you voted "No" for them.
|
07-14-07 04:34am
|
