| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
There are definitely fewer peeing scenes from some of the classic networks that used to be top sources. 21sextury is one, remember when they had peepeebabes.com? DDF is another one, they have slowed down their release of pee scenes on HouseofTaboo.com in a big way. The early ones on GiveMePink.com were amazing, I wish they did more like that. I even just recently noticed pee scenes slowing down on ATKExotics.com. Hopefully ATK turns that around, because that site is one of the absolute best.
At the same time, there are tons of smaller sites producing pee scenes. There are also some great new sites coming out, like VirtualPee.com with VR pee scenes from Puffy Network. It's hard to say if there is over all more or less new pee content now vs then. It's definitely more spread out now among small sites, but there is a lot of it still.
|
10-07-18 03:58pm
|
Reply
302
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review!
Does the newer content include any more squirting or peeing scenes, or is that only in their pre-2010 scenes? I'll join again if it does, but I can't tell from the previews.
|
10-06-18 07:31am
|
Reply
303
|
Gloryhole Secrets
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Comment
You are a true bukkake fan if seeing bukkake is not enough, and you need beautiful women doing bukkake in an artistic, glam setting!
|
05-03-15 02:00pm
|
Reply
304
|
Got 2 Pee
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
The webmaster at Got2Pee.com is an honest guy in my experience, so I imagine he will help get this straight for you.
I also went back to got2pee.com because you mentioned it, and see they now have a 66% off spring sale!
|
04-30-17 12:52pm
|
Reply
305
|
Got 2 Pee
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Great review! Sounds like they've grown since I joined, I only have the first 83 scenes.
|
02-24-16 01:26pm
|
Reply
306
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The number of videos was the same before and after the down time. The total size of the videos was 221 Gb beforehand. If it's the same now, then there probably was not any editing.
|
11-02-14 12:49pm
|
Reply
307
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Here's the article where he made the announcement: http://www.xbiz.com/news/186289
They are reviewing shoots and possibly editing or removing some.
|
11-02-14 11:08am
|
Reply
308
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Did you see that hardcoregangbang.com is back up now? You should check it out!
|
11-01-14 06:43pm
|
Comment
309
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
|
10-29-14 07:29pm
Replies (8)
|
Comment
310
|
HD Wetting
(0)
|
|
06-01-16 08:40am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
311
|
HD Wetting
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
See my next comment...
|
06-01-16 08:37am
|
Comment
312
|
HD Wetting
(0)
|
|
05-26-16 05:41pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
313
|
Homegrown Video
(0)
|
Reply of
grakkie's Comment
That sounds like a terrible system. Not only does it piss customers off, but it wastes the support person's time on the clock.
|
05-24-14 06:39pm
|
Reply
314
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
AceDDF
"Additionally a pissing scene is highly niched, and this is more of a BDSM site then a Pissing site."
Be that as it may, DDF has produced some of the best and most memorable pissing scenes online. It's amazing to me that it doesn't sell too well. Unfortunately, I think the majority of pissing fans online do not pay for their porn. Same for most niches, I'm sure.
|
09-29-15 06:17pm
|
Comment
315
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
|
09-28-15 05:13pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
316
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
|
06-20-15 07:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
317
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
David19's Review
So now I know where all those guys with the telephoto lenses on "fishing boats" anchored off the nude beaches sent their photos.
|
04-19-15 03:37pm
|
Review
318
|
Images 4 Sale
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Images4sale has some unique content not seen anywhere else. You can choose to purchase only the shoots that you want. Some companies keep their images4sale.com stores open after they close their paysites, so you can find some rare content if you are willing to pay. There are also a number of amateurs who post here, and it's often, but not always, a cut above the free amateur pics online. The quality of the content is whatever the store owner chooses to upload.
-300 independent image stores
-likely millions of photos but unable to know exactly
-support is responsive and helpful
-resolution up to 3000x2000 seen
-can preview sets with thumbnails and 1 full sized iamges |
| Cons: |
Images4sale.com does not present a value proposition that generates interest for most customers. Charging $3-10 per photo set is a bit expensive for most tastes.
-prices too high
-resolutions as low as 320x480
-many files cannot be downloaded after purchase |
| Bottom Line: |
Images4sale.com is the little brother of clips4sale.com. Unfortunately, while C4S has taken off, I4S has been left behind. It's not that they don't have tons of content. You can search your favorite niche on I4S, and you will find dozens of studios selling photo sets. It is very much a backwater of the porn world though. It doesn't exactly get a lot of conversions. For example, I purchased a photo set a few days ago, and it was the only sale the studio had made since it's creation in 2007. You can tell if this is the case because each studio lists it's top selling photo sets. If nothing is listed, they have never made a sale. I actually cannot count the studios where my purchases were the only sales ever logged. I talked with an I4S studio owner the other day who confirmed this, that I was the only one who ever bought anything from her studio. I like digging deep for rare porn, so there is something oddly satisfying about this. To see a nice looking shoot online, and think of the effort that went into producing it, and realize that no one has ever purchased it, no one has probably seen it besides the producers, and then to buy it and be the first and maybe only customer to lay eyes on it - there is something very satisfying about that, and it is worth $5 to me. This is the appeal of I4S. You can go way off the beaten track and be the first or even only customer to see the shoots of your choosing. Considering that each shoot would take hundreds of dollars for you to produce, this is a good deal.
Unfortunately, there is a major problem with I4S. Upon purchasing and being billed for a photo set, you may find that it no longer exists on their server. This problem seems to affect about 20% of their photo sets. Support will respond promptly and offer to substitute another photo set, but still, this is a big problem. I had other photo sets that I wanted, so I took the substitution, but I can't imagine that they wouldn't give your money back if you pushed for it. You would be justified in initiating a chargeback if they didn't, and you could get it back, so don't let this drive you away, but be aware that the shoots that you want may actually be gone.
It is not clear why shoots have gone down like this in such large numbers. In the first case I came across, support said that it was deleted by the studio owner. I got a hold of the owner though, and she did not delete anything, and she is going to search her old hard drives for the content. I suspect that I4S knows more than they let on. The damage is widespread enough that I would guess it was probably a server failure on their end, and they haven't been able to go back and take down the affected sets from the preview/purchase pages.
They also lose points in my book for taking down their person to person peeing content. I have still been able to purchase some directly from the owners though through channels outside of I4S/C4S ;-).
Finally, it is an interesting sign of the times to compare C4S and I4S. Both charge about $3-10 per purchase, which is either a single photo set or a single video. C4S has been a raging success during these trying times for the industry, while stores that have made more than 4 sales on I4S are the exception not the rule. I guess it really is true, unfortunately, that most people just value photos a lot less than videos.
I still look at $5 for a photo set as a good value for me, even though I realize that it is not a good value for the vast majority of people. Like I said before, to book a model for a shoot and do it yourself would be hundreds of dollars, so this is still a great deal to me. I never thought I would make it though the content at such an expensive site, but I have finally done it. I looked over all of their peeing content, and downloaded about half of it, the best half. I skipped over models who didn't show their face, extremely poor resolution, amateur models in very bad shape, and content that I already had from other sites. I can't recommend doing that for most people, but just try this - look up your favorite niche, browse through the studios, find something totally obscure but appealing and download it - you may be the first one to ever do it! |
|
04-06-15 05:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
319
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Jack Incognito's Comment
ALS is another good one.
|
04-12-17 03:38pm
|
Reply
320
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Couldn't agree more, I too would love to zoom in more on some of those shots.
|
09-16-15 06:37pm
|
Reply
321
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Not all photos of a given resolution are the same. For example, for a grainy and poorly lit photo, the resolution could be 3000x5000, and it would still suck. At the same time, I still appreciate the best photos from over a decade ago that were shot skillfully and released in 600x900.
To their credit, ITC makes good use of 2400x1800. Their photos are sharp, the subject is in focus, there is no grainyness, and they are well lit. They generally go for a high depth of field too to get the entire model in focus, and they go to the wide angle lens more often than most sites.
They are all about the close-up, and they do a good job at 2400x1800. The obvious next step for them as a leading "close-up site" it to up the resolution. I can't wait for the day I see 3000x5000 on ITC!
|
09-15-15 05:13pm
|
Reply
322
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Agreed, you should definitely check this out rearadmiral. It is mostly solo, but it is all about the ass. Excellent close-ups in stills and scenes.
|
09-05-15 03:12pm
|
Review
323
|
Juliland
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The unique and artistic nature of Richard Avery's photography and videos is the main selling point of this site. Call it "art porn," "erotica," "glam-fetish," "artistic nudes," or simply "art," it could hold it's own hanging on the walls or looped on the video projectors of some contemporary art museums. It is also actively updating with many beautiful and well known models. You will like this site if you like visually stimulating, innovative scenes featuring solo models. They also feature lots of "wet and messy" scenes. This includes lots of smeared makeup, spitting, paint, water, food play, and a small handful of great peeing scenes. For those curious, the peeing scenes feature Jade Vixen, Sophie Dee, Veronique Vasquez, Aiden Ashley, Bobbi Starr, Kaylynn, Nautica Thorn, Roxi Deville, Ruby Luster, Annika Amour, and Audrey Bitoni. You can get a good idea of what this site has to offer by just browsing the preview content available before joining.
-1328 photo sets
-688 videos |
| Cons: |
While the work of Richard Avery is amazing, the execution of the site leaves something to be desired.
-small photo-sets (15-25 photos)
-low resolution photos by modern standards (1500x1150)
-photos are grainy (have to assume this is intentional)
-videos are small (two sizes: 640x360, 480x288) and short (3-6 minutes) |
| Bottom Line: |
Richard Avery is certainly an amazing photographer and videographer, and I would highly recommend checking out his site to see his unique work. As I browsed through his shoots, I was thoroughly impressed, and I just need to say "thank you!" to Richard Avery for continuing to produce this amazing work over the years. This site has so much potential, but I could not give it the high score that I was hoping it would earn. This is for several reasons, but primarily the resolution of the content. It may have been medium to high resolution in 2006 when the first shoots came out, but now 8 years have gone by, and the resolution has not been increased. They are still putting out new content, but they must be bringing the resolution down to 1500x1150 in post-production, which does not make any sense in today's market. When I join a contemporary site with artistic nudes, I expect excellent technical quality including resolution, and the resolution is lacking here. Also, there is grainyness that is so coarse and prominent in some shoots that I have to assume it is intentional. I see how it gives the shoots a gritty feel, but it is just not to my personal liking. Grainyness is an accidental feature of so much mediocre porn that it is a big pet peeve of mine.
Richard Avery's work is so amazing, that it actually makes the resolution issue more annoying than ever. If a site with mediocre content has mediocre resolution, that is to be expected. Great content, on the other hand, should be presented well. This is like going to an art museum, seeing some priceless works of art, but being roped off 50 feet away, leaving you unable to see the details.
Enough about my frustrations with the site though, and back to what makes Richard Avery's work so great. He makes very dramatic use of light, dark, and color in his composition. He will frequently make deliberate use of saturated highlights, and sometimes lowlights, to accent his scenes, and this is a technique that I really love. Avery and Frannie Adams were the two photographers who have made the best use of this technique in artistic fetish nudes, and now that Frannie has left the scene, Avery is the undisputed champion. Even with the resolution being what it is, I cannot help but highly recommend this site. |
|
11-21-14 08:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
324
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
ElPorno's Review
I was a fan of midnightprowl.com, but mostly for their pee videos. Are there any on killergram.com?
|
07-27-14 07:56am
|
Comment
325
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
|
02-03-17 04:27pm
Replies (1)
|
|
