| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
DDFNetwork's Reply
Hi Kris,
That is great news. Thank you for getting in touch with your reproduction team on my behalf. I am really glad to hear that these amazing shoots have a chance of being seen again, and that you would be willing to say a few words for me at your updates planning. I completely understand why you must follow a specific structure as you remaster your older content. I will be in touch with you regarding some specific requests. Sometimes I think porn is like art ... too often it isn't fully appreciated until it becomes scarce. Now that these classic DDF shoots are gone, if only temporarily, I have realized how amazing they really are. It's an uncommon site that would give the time of day to this type of request, and an even rarer one that would honor it. DDF already stands out thanks to your reply.
Best,
LPee23
|
07-28-14 06:17pm
|
Reply
277
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
DDFNetwork's Reply
Hi Kris,
DDF is lacking nothing in terms of new updates. You are putting out some amazing stuff. Did you read my comments on the previous DDF review and on my poll regarding removing old content where I mentioned DDF? You will see that this is something that I am very opinionated about. I was about to post a review that gave DDF some of my highest praises but also some harsh but honest criticism for removing some truly epic older shoots. My interactions with your first-line customer support have been pleasant, but after 6 months they have not resulted in a single classic DDF shoot in the pee fetish genre being re-posted. The sets that I have in mind don't have Best By Dates, and they feature models such as Sandy, Justine Joli, Zafira, and Zuzana Z.
For a while I held off on writing my review of DDF. It would have been a difficult review to write. On one hand, DDF is amazing, and your new content deserves 100%. On the other hand, it frustrates me to no end to have missed out on such amazing older content. I am glad to see you posting here for DDF and listening to PU members. I would love to give you feedback as you remaster older content. Is there a way we can talk more about this? You can either reply to me here, PM me here at PU, or reply to my email via my username LPee23 at DDF. I am now holding off on writing my review again, not because I even presume that an honest but negative review from one member could necessarily move mountains at DDF, but because I really hope that this issue can be resolved, and I would really much rather write you the positive review that I think you deserve one day.
Best,
LPee23
|
07-25-14 06:56pm
|
Reply
278
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Ace DDF
"Well this is the nature of having a site which stems back from 1999. We are looking into the possibilities of Remastering all the old content...but it is arduous, and with over 20 new releases each week....main focus is on New content, old content is more of a Bonus."
As a past member for several months, who had a chance to look over your older content, I have to say that this would be awesome. During my time as a member, I already expressed this to support, but it deserves to be said again here.
Monahan
"However, I like the DDF approach far better than most other sites that simply take down the old stuff. When I get a strong interest in a specific model, I'm happy getting as much stuff as possible. But it certainly would be helpful to identify the quality level of each offering that appears on a model's "home page" (the page that displays all material for a model)."
This can't be said enough. It would be a huge loss if this older content were removed. While the videos could use the most remastering, the photo quality back then is still very enjoyable today, even if it is not up to modern standards. Some of those older scenes are just so well shot, and the models are so hot. I also like to keep track of models, and it would be really frustrating if a favorite model's shoots were removed, even if they were low quality.
Thanks Ace DDF for talking with us here about these points. While we are on the subject of older DDF content and particular models, I can't help but ask, what happened to the shoots with Justine Joli (aka Swan and Hope) that used to be on houseoftaboo.com? I downloaded some free samples of those on TGP's a long time ago, but the shoots aren't there anymore. Do you still have those archived anywhere? Justine Joli is amazing - any chance that even the original non-remastered shoots might be re-posted?
|
07-01-14 05:09pm
|
Review
279
|
Digital Desire
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The photography at digitaldesire.com is up there with the best. I've got nothing but admiration for the photographic acumen of the photographer who founded the site, the late, great J Stephen Hicks. His photography alone warrants a top score, but as you will see, there are other factors that I have to factor into this review. The good:
-over 700 models
-high quality, artistic glamour photos
-3198 photo sets
-resolution ranging from 3000x3000 to 711x466
-1323 videos
-resolution ranging from 1080P to 720P
-weekly updates |
| Cons: |
Unfortunately, the cons tend to overshadow the pros at this site:
-extensive amount of older content has been removed from the site
-removal of older content continues despite ongoing objections from members
-support is unresponsive |
| Bottom Line: |
When I join a site and plan to review it, I try to step outside of my own personal experience, and try to see it from the standpoint of who I imagine their typical customer to be. That being said, so that you can understand ny bias which I have tried to eliminate from the score, here is my personal experience.
I joined because I once saved a freaking amazing DDGXtreme photo of Michelle Michaels "squirting" (judging by the massive stream, she was really peeing, but all the better) for a DDGXtreme shoot. I joined the site, hoping to get this whole set and more, but found nothing. No squirting or peeing remained in their members section. So I asked support about it, and I got crickets.
Meanwhile, I checked their members forum, and learned that my experience was not unique. The forum is full of complaints about DDG removing old sets. This is apparently the way they have managed their site all along, even in the J Stephen Hicks days, with complaints about large segments of content missing going back before 2008.
Here's some history on the DDGXtreme content. Back in the mid 2000's, they noticed that more "extreme" content tended to sell better, even though it was not something that Hicks was into. The reluctantly shot it anyway and released it under the DDGXtreme section of the site. It included closeups, fingering, and penetration with dildos, while the majority of their content was strictly softcore nudes. I have the evidence that they shot a squirting scene too, although no one else among prior DDG customers who I have talked with seems to remember any squirting.
Around 2007, they decided to roll all of their content together as they re-launched their site as digitaldesire.com. Their official line is that the DDG content got rolled in with the DDGXtreme content. This is true in a sense - the DDG content that remains is intermixed with the DDGXtreme content that remains. The truth that they avoid addressing directly in the forums, and that members bring up again and again, is that large numbers of scenes from both DDG and DDGXtreme were lost when they re-launched digitaldesire.com. So as disappointed as I was as someone joining DDG looking for a rare squirting scene, I do not feel my score is too low, because the DDG forum is full of members who love the softcore shoots that DDG is known for, who are complaining about about missing scenes.
There are occasional cases where someone from DDG has responded to these complaints in their forum. The initial response was that they were remastering some older scenes. Their latest response was something along the lines of saying that all of the existing scenes have been remastered, but they will talk with the people doing that work to see if there are any more. The truth that went unsaid was that there are many scenes that do not exist anymore.
On one hand, I can only be so critical. I give the three photographers still at DDG a lot of credit for continuing to run the site, despite the tragic loss of Hicks, and for at least making some of his content available. Nine times out of ten a photographer such as Hicks does not have anyone to carry on his legacy, so I give credit for that. That is the sole reason that I did not ask for a refund - because I kind of respect that. The problem is, while I am glad DDG keeps some of this content available, they just don't do a great job at it. It is what it is.
I hope they have a forgotten archive somewhere that they can search through and do right by their members. While I came to this site with tastes that differ from the typical DDG member, I think my experience was actually typical.
Sites that habitually remove old content will only ruin their brand in the long run. |
|
02-06-16 04:21pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
280
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
There was a spectacular squirting scene with Michelle Michaels on DDGXtreme, I know that much, but I'm not sure if there were more. Anyway, their webmaster explained a while ago on the DDG forum that they just rolled all of the DDGXtreme content into the main site when they did the redesign. After the redesign, however, a number of members noted that a large number of scenes, both from DDG and DDGXtreme, never made it onto the redesigned site. I guess this squirting scene and any others must not have made it.
|
01-05-16 05:51am
|
Reply
281
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
I guess it was only on DDGXtreme.com. Were any of you lucky enough to join that site while it was around?
|
01-04-16 01:46pm
|
Comment
282
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
01-04-16 09:53am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
283
|
Doctor Trickles
(0)
|
|
09-19-13 07:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
284
|
Erotica Shot
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This excellent site features the work of photographer Jean-Paul Four.
-distinct and unparalleled photography style
-over 250 models
-over 87,000 photos
-photo size ranges from 4800x3200 to 600x400
-unique sets and settings
-wide variety of sex acts
-actively updating (average 8 sets every other week)
-Jean-Paul goes above and beyond for his members |
| Cons: |
The photography is second to none, and that is what is most important. There are a few cons that have more to do with delivery than content.
-no gallery format only slideshow
-very few downloadable zips
-rare cases of broken images
I will not list no videos as a con, since this is a photography site after all, but it should be noted for the video fans. |
| Bottom Line: |
I would highly recommend this site to any fan of artistic and erotic photography. Jean-Paul Four has crafted a unique and memorable style that sets him apart from his peers. You can see this style on his landing page. He shoots everything from solo scenes to bondage and S&M. While he uses a variety of indoor and a few outdoor locations, the majority of his scenes are shot on a stage, which is arranged with different curtains, backdrop, flooring, and props for each scene. The ambiance is often dark, with a deliberate use of hard lighting on the models to accentuate the curves and form of their bodies. Jean-Paul also uses a variety of filters including sepia and grayscale.
There is elaborate bondage with rope in many scenes. This is not the painful or inescapable version of bondage, but instead the ropes are intricately and beautifully woven over the models in diverse patterns, with as much attention to aesthetic as restraint. Actually, it was impressive to see how bondage was used to enable new and stunning poses. In one scene, you might have a model striking a zero gravity type pose while fully suspended. In another, you might have one leg bound and suspended, and the other planted on the ground, for another pose that would not be possible without the ropes.
There are a wide variety of props and fetish costumes in the scenes. Carnival masks and blindfolds are among the favorites. Models frequently wear nylons, garters, latex, leather, corsets, collars, masks, goggles, even a scene or two with plaster casts and crutches. Candles are used in many scenes, and models are often drizzled with candle wax. As far as S&M goes there are nipple and labial clamps in many scenes, and real flogging which was hard enough to leave marks. There are plenty of scenes with peeing, over 130 of them on my latest count, and they are absolutely some of the best out there. They include solo peeing as well as a few golden showers. There is plenty of b/g and g/g action and even some solo male scenes for those inclined. Sex acts featured include vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs, cum shots, strapons, dildos, speculums, fisting, enemas, and squirting.
The photos are displayed in a slideshow format, so the only way to survey all of the photos on the site is to load and examine each photo individually. This would generally be frustrating, but these photos were interesting enough that I never tired of going through them one by one.
After going through all of the photos and saving my favorites, including the pee scenes, I was left with some really stunning additions to my collection. Some of the older ones were really amazing photos, but they were from the early years of the site, which started in 2001, and the resolution was on the lower end. So, I figured I would email Jean-Paul, and ask if he would be willing to take the time to pull a small handful of 20 or so of my favorites from his archives in full resolution. He responded promptly, he was happy to help out, and he sent me links to the photos within a week. He definitely went far beyond what your typical webmaster would do. Thanks to him, I now have a handful of incredible photos, in never before seen high resolution. This was one of the most memorable sites I have joined, and I would recommend it to any fan of artistic fetish photography. |
|
10-02-16 07:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
285
|
Extreme Holly
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
There must be an error here, because I still don't see your email including in my spam folder. I'll contact support about this. In the mean time, to get around this problem, I've made a throw-away email address that I'll post here for you: fscbfnnu.tk1@20minutemail.com . Email me there, then I'll reply to you from my real email. This throw-away email will only be active for 20 minutes.
|
04-29-14 04:49pm
|
Reply
286
|
Extreme Holly
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
Hey BadAndy400,
Here I am, replying to another old review of yours! Long story short, you are in a unique position to help out with something because you downloaded ExtremeHolly.com at the time you did. I have been in discussions with PinkVisual about this issue, who since acquired ExtremeHolly.com, and there is something in it for you if you want to get in touch with me. I can't say all the details here, it involves some special arrangements with PinkVisual. That's why I tried to PM/email you, but I figure your email address listed with PornUsers.com might be an old one you don't check often. I check my email listed here daily if you want to get in touch. Anyway, I look forward to hearing from you!
LPee
|
04-29-14 02:52pm
|
Reply
287
|
Extreme Holly
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
Which site is this that offers ExtremeHolly.com content as a bonus?
|
02-16-14 07:48am
|
Comment
288
|
Femanic
(0)
|
|
02-06-15 05:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
289
|
Femdom Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I was a member a few months ago. It seems much improved from what was described in the past. No freezes or download limits.
When meangirlsclub.com closed, they moved the content over to Femdom Empire, and that is a huge plus at no extra cost.
Definitely some memorable videos. My favorite was Riley Reid peeing.
|
07-30-15 03:08pm
|
Reply
290
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Their site is either hacked, or they are willingly redirecting to malicious sites. Likely hacked.
|
01-02-17 04:16pm
|
Reply
291
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Nice review. While some of their sites have some great content, they did a poor job maintaining it over the years. For example, I once checked out KinkyCarmen.com, and noticed that some of the pee scenes they released to MGP's were not available in the member's area. I asked the webmaster about this, actually got a reply, sent him copies of the scenes I was looking for, then never heard anything back again...
Edit: This was supposed to be a reply to the review, as much as I like your comment too rearadmiral!
|
02-06-16 02:16pm
|
Reply
292
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
In all fairness, the webmaster did eventually reply, it just took a while. See my reply to rearadmiral's review for more details.
|
10-11-15 08:16pm
|
Reply
293
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Nice review!
I'd also add that they've got the pissing niche covered too on KinkyCarmen.com. Carmen Rivera is a pretty big deal in Germany from what I understand.
To update my previous comment about the webmaster being unreachable, they did eventually get back to me, it just took a long time. I was looking for a particular video that was once released on KinkyCarmen.com, but is no longer online. The webmaster did ask for the details of the video, etc, but I haven't heard anything back since then.
|
10-11-15 08:14pm
|
Comment
294
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
|
01-27-14 08:05pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
295
|
Forever Vamp
(0)
|
|
12-05-16 04:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
296
|
Forever Vamp
(0)
|
|
10-15-16 09:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
297
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
Thank you Yujin. FTVGirls is an excellent site, and I am optimistic that we will hear something back from them.
|
08-19-18 10:52am
|
Comment
298
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
08-13-18 08:41am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
299
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Nice review!
I'd also add that there are hundreds of squirting scenes on the site, and some are truly spectacular.
The photos used to be downloadable as zips, I guess they took away that option to save space on their servers.
As a photo fan, it is too bad that some sites feel photos (or downloadable zips) are not worth their space on a server.
|
08-23-15 10:37am
|
Reply
300
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jimmy455's Comment
If it is a credit card not debit, you can probably contact Mastercard and initiate a charge-back. I don't have experience with Matercard personally in this area, but many credit cards will do this. Once you initiate the charge-back, they will send the biller a bunch of paperwork with an opportunity to contest the charge-back, but I doubt they can challenge it in this case.
|
03-05-14 08:12pm
|
|
