| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2751
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Reply
Wow! 6 or 8 more reviews just waiting. I don't have the time for that many memberships at once. A couple of weekends ago my wife headed away with some friends and I took three memberships out. I'm pretty particular about cataloguing the material and backing it up, so it'll be a couple of weeks before I'm on the hunt for another site again.
Between PU reviews and the "What's Hot" reviews at TBP it is usually fairly easy to find something that I'm interested in.
|
05-16-11 04:27pm
|
Reply
2752
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Reply
Glad to do it. I think you'll find this is a very welcoming group. Regardless of the topic that brings us all here, there is a lot of civility - and a lot of good fun.
|
05-16-11 02:13pm
|
Reply
2753
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Review
Excellent review! I'm not normally a fan of softcore, but I'm regularly drawn to sites like MetArt for many of the reasons you seem to be.
Welcome to PU.
|
05-16-11 03:59am
|
Reply
2754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It appears that we're a fairly representative group. I'd like to think that we accept the different tastes that others have.
|
05-16-11 03:56am
|
Reply
2755
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the comments, graymane. I'm not a big fan of girl-girl, but when she won't do boy-girl I do like to see some interaction.
Little April was one of my favorites, though I liked Little Summer more. The video quality was horrendous though. I see that the Little April and Litte Summer sites have been de-listed from TBP and PU. They must have been up to some shady business.
|
05-15-11 06:41pm
|
Review
2756
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Super-cute, young model
- Video and photos available
- Photos available in zips
- Multiple options for downloads
- Part of a small network of similar sites
- Some girl-girl scenes
- Supports download managers
- Decent download speeds |
| Cons: |
- Not updating
- Many of the other models on the network are topless only
- The only B/G hardcore scene costs extra |
| Bottom Line: |
First, please note that I agree with everything that exotics4me wrote in his recent review. Read that first if you want to join this site. My review will attempt to expand on a few things.
I’m not normally a big fan of solo girl sites. I find them boring and repetitive and they tend to have a shorter lifespan than many other kinds of sites. I’ve also been burned by a couple (notably Little April and Little Summer) due to the terrible quality of the videos. Then one day I noticed the picture that accompanies exotics4me’s posts on the forum and I was hooked.
Pamela is an amazing looking young South or Central American model. She can’t be much over 18 in many of the photos and videos and her youthful appearance is further accentuated by her braces. She appears solo in many scenes and also does a lot of girl-girl scenes. Both the pictures and videos are well lighted and shot. The other models she appears with in the girl-girl scenes are also attractive in the same way that Pamela is.
There is one boy-girl hardcore scene available, but in a greedy marketing twist the site sells that separately. I like Pamela, but not enough to spend $20 for a 13 minute video of her having sex.
Exotics4me notes that several of the videos feature some exhibitionism. That’s correct, but I’d characterize it as ‘exhibitionism-lite.’ It isn’t promoted as being one of the reasons for joining, but there are some scenes of her teasing a bit in public places. But the exhibitionism is fairly tame and I wouldn’t recommend taking a membership for that reason alone.
The site is part of a small network of that includes access to six similar sites. The additional sites are also small and don’t appear to be updating. At least two of the sites (Selena Spice and Spice Twins) don’t even feature full nudity. They’re topless only with a thong or some other covering on the naughty bits. The additional models are attractive and young, but I think that Pamela is the best looking of all of them.
The technical bits are pretty simple given the small size of the site. There are 68 photo sets (zips available, 798x1200 resolution) and 108 videos. The videos are available in three formats: Super HQ, MP4 and Low Speed Video. I downloaded only the “Super HQ” size and found that while they may have been industry standard when they were shot, they certainly aren’t now. They’re all 720x480 with the bitrates ranging from 2000 to 8700kbps. The technical description mostly applies to the other sites on the network too.
Pamela Spice is definitely good looking and fits my usual style of model that I like. If you like young looking models you might be happy with a membership. The girl-girl stuff, the minimal exhibitionism and the additional sites all contribute to the value of the membership, but given that there are no updates I wouldn’t call this a good value. That’s not to say you shouldn’t join, but just join with your eyes open. |
|
05-15-11 11:55am
Replies (9)
|
Review
2757
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of PornPros Network
- Discount through TBP / PU
- Multiple download options
- Streaming available
- No DRM
- Watermark is small enough to be ignored
- Pics available (both separate and screecaps)
- Pics available as a zip
- Supports download managers
- 77 exclusive scenes (as of review date)
- Site updates weekly |
| Cons: |
- “HD” doesn’t look like true HD
- Not enough anal. (Yes, I know that’s very subjective.) |
| Bottom Line: |
I realize that the niche of having old guys fuck young women is not for everyone, but if it is something you like to watch, this site is definitely worth checking out.
Many of the girls on this site are a “who’s who” of A-list porn starlets today, and the format is one that definitely accentuates their youthful appearances. Girls such as Ashlii Orion, Jaelyn Fox, Amai Lui and Jada Stevens all make appearances. Some lesser known (but hopefully up-‘n’-coming) girls like Cheyenne Cooper are also here. Each scene is approximately 30 minutes long and there is usually a stereotypical setup for a scene with a young girl and an older guy: teacher, supervisor, driving instructor or something similar to further accentuate the age difference between the girl and the guy.
The guys are obviously a bigger part of the scene than would be acceptable in most porn scenes, BUT they never really get in the way of scene like many younger, self-indulgent male models do. The guys seem to know that they’re there to help show off the girl. And they should know that since the guys have a lot of experience in the business. Since there aren’t too many geezers still actually working in porn today, the talent pool is pretty shallow. Rod Fontana is here, as are a few other ‘seniors’ who I can’t name. One of them looks like Adolf Hitler and another looks like a slightly younger version of Col. Sanders. Perhaps the biggest male name here is also the most polarizing: Ron Jeremy. You either love him or hate him. Ron appears in a large number of the scenes. That may be a testament to his reliability.
As for the technical bits, the site is pretty standard for a good porn site. There are 77 scenes posted (with updates being added). Each scene offers a trailer to get an idea if you want to download the scene. If you do want to download, you have three options: MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. The HD doesn’t appear to be true HD though. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate. I’m not sure if that qualifies as HD, but it doesn’t look as sharp as I’m used to with other HD stuff.)
The site also offers photos. Both screencaps and actual photos are available, either individually or as a zipped set. The photos I looked at were high-resolution and looked great (3000x1996).
This is purely subjective, but there aren’t enough anal scenes here. Anal sex is a turn-off for some, but it is pretty mainstream and it is apparent in its absence here. It may be that most of the models don’t do anal (yet!), but of the 77 scenes there are only 4 or 5 anal, which seems low.
This site is part of a network that offers some interesting and innovative other sites, though for the $17.95 TBP discount price, this site alone is worth it. The network and individual sites are fairly simple and straightforward to use. There is no reliance on gimmicks. The search function is limited, but simple to use and effective.
If you like this kind of niche, I’d highly recommend this. |
|
05-14-11 09:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2758
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
B/B/G is just a threeway. Three would be an absolute minimum for a gangbang.
|
05-14-11 04:46am
|
Reply
2759
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always for me too. I find that both usually compliment each other. And I appreciate the effort that TBP staff put into the reviews as well as the efforts that PUs (and PU staff) take.
|
05-12-11 02:59am
|
Reply
2760
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
Thanks for the review. I'm a huge fan of the Kink network but I've never been a member of this site. It interests me, and I've considered it, but I just haven't done it. I might have to join you in giving it a try.
BTW - I got an email about a new Kink site that just went live. It is called Bound Gangbangs, or something to that effect. It looks pretty good though it is still pretty small.
|
05-11-11 05:08pm
|
Comment
2761
|
Real Slut Party
(0)
|
|
05-11-11 04:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2762
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My preference (and I'm sure the preference of most of us here) is to be given almost limitless ability to look around. Consider sites like Videobox. Someone who stumbles on VB can see EVERY video they have on the site. They can see the various means to download it and the file sizes. Those sites don't try to hide anything, which, to me makes them seem like they have nothing to hide.
|
05-11-11 04:43pm
|
Reply
2763
|
Real Slut Party
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Funny you ask that question. I had to go out and buy a new drive over the weekend because my bride was away and I signed up to three sites.
I hadn't thought of the fact that most DVDs are about 700MB, so the fact that some of the files on this site are seven times that size sure does raise eyebrows. I downloaded several of the scenes that I really wanted to see in the 720p HD and the rest in WMV SD. The HD stuff does look pretty good though.
|
05-09-11 04:25pm
|
Review
2764
|
Real Slut Party
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of the Mofo Network (10 sites in total on the network)
- Approximately 80 scenes
- Scenes are lengthy (most around an hour)
- Multiple download options (HD, SD and mobile)
- 2 levels of HD available 1080p and 720p)
- Streaming available
- Some amazing looking girls
- Better than average download speeds
- Discount through TBP
- Updates weekly
- Interesting mix of known porn girls and lesser-known models
- Photos available
- Download managers work
- Lots of fun to watch |
| Cons: |
- As with most ‘party’ sites, most of the guys are annoying (but not as bad as with other sites)
- Hand-held camera can be a bit shaky in some scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
It goes without saying, obviously, that a large part of satisfaction in a site is subjective. If a site does all the technical bits well, it isn’t going to matter too much if you just don’t like the theme of the site. So having stated that, I really like ‘party’ sites like these, and this is one of the better ones I’ve joined.
The site is probably big enough to be a decent value on its own, but it is part of a bigger network. This specific site has about 80 videos posted and each of those is about an hour long. Each of the scenes has a unique setup that is actually interesting to watch. I didn’t find myself constantly skipping ahead to the sex. There is a mix of indoor and outdoor video shoots, with the outdoor scenes usually being shot by a pool so there are lots of skimpy bikinis around. The first half of the video is taken up with the set-up and the second half is the sex.
The lighting is usually very good – the outdoor scenes aren’t washed out and the indoor scenes are mostly lit properly. The camera work is better than average for these kinds of sites. Adding to the professional look of the scenes is the fact that this obviously isn’t a group of self-centered guys who decided to make a porn site – the director always makes sure that the girls are the focus of the attention.
This site, and the Mofo network generally, have the technical bits right: all the scenes are available in three different sizes. The HD is available in 1080p and 720p (and they look great!), the SD video is available in MPEG4, MPEG and WMV. And there’s also an option for mobile users. I didn’t list this as a con above, but given the length of these videos the files sizes are huge. Some top out at over 5GB for the 1080p. There are photos available too, with zips as an option
Another possible issue for some people is that there is very little variation on the type of model in each scene. If your tastes are like mine this is no issue here because the overwhelming majority of the models are petite and young. I don’t think there are any black or ethnic models, and no one over 25 either. But if you’re a fan of models like Tanner Mayes and Micah Moore and girls who have that body type, you’ll certainly like the girls here.
This site alone is a good enough value to justify the membership, especially when you join through TBP/PU and get the discount. But there are nine other sites (including a MILF site and a gangbang site) that only increase the value of the membership. If you like watching petite young lasses party and enjoy themselves, then this is a site definitely worth checking out. |
|
05-08-11 03:46pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2765
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I'm not surprised to hear that there is no customer service. I suspect that the site is just so big now that customer service just isn't on the menu any longer. I don't think I've ever had to contact them for anything so I have no experience with the customer service.
I can't say I've experienced the speed and distortion problems that you report. I use Free Download Manager to allow we to queue up a bunch of scenes and then leave it to run on its own and my normal DL speed is 1880KB/sec.
I realize that it is a personal preference, but give some thought to trying them again. Customer service probably remains as bad, but the other issuse may have been fixed.
|
05-06-11 04:26pm
|
Reply
2766
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
VB2 is the VB that you're familiar with if you've had a VB membership in the past couple of years. VB3 is a new, updated interface. The porn is still the same, it's just that the look is different. I really can't give you an opinion on it because I used the older interface because that's what I'm used to. VB3 does seem to be as easy to use though, so if it becomes the only interface I won't have a problem with that. Two of the 'premium' channels - Kink and Reality Kings - are only available by using VB3.
My biggest complaint with VB3 is that it 'fixes' something that wasn't broken. I suspect that it was a change made by marketing, not the webmaster.
|
05-06-11 04:21pm
|
Reply
2767
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Happy to do it. I know that this site gets reviewed a lot, but I like to think that a new review can still add something.
|
05-06-11 04:15pm
|
Reply
2768
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Enjoy! I'm trying to decide whether to hang around for another month. I'm caught up on video downloads but I've been going back and getting higher-resolution versions of favorite scenesnow that I have a faster connection. And i also feel a bit guilty since I've downloaded probably 700GB so far this time.
|
05-06-11 04:14pm
|
Reply
2769
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
It's good to see your coming around messmer! But now that you mention it, 'mature' is probably an underserved niche on VB.
|
05-04-11 05:50pm
|
Review
2770
|
VideoBox
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- One of the biggest and best sites on the internet
- Low monthly price
- Huge variety of material available, from mainstream to fetish
- Many fetishes represented
- Excellent download speeds
- Many options for downloads available
- Streaming is available
- Editing the clips is an option
- No download limits
- New material added daily
- Some HD material being added
- Access to ‘premium channels’ for a small fee (note that if you don’t want to pay the fee the basic VB membership is still the best value on the internet)
- Added premium access to some Kink.com scenes and some Reality Kings scenes
- Seem to have improved the quality of their updates since my last review
- Daily updates seem to all occur at once now, no more checking in every few hours |
| Cons: |
- While not as obvious as in the past, there is still some reliance on lower-grade porn to make the daily updates
- Still adding compilations where the original scenes are also available
- The Evil Angel and Vivid premium channels are no longer bundled for one price
- Kink.com and Reality Kings only available on VB3
- VB3 seems like a change driven by marketing rather than a genuine move to improve the site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my fourth review of VB since becoming a PU member many years ago. I had hoped to focus on the new, ‘improved,’ VB3 but I’ll have to leave that to someone else. I’m sure that VB3 is fairly easy to use and straightforward once you get used to it, but with VB2 being as simple and straightforward as it is already why bother changing it? I’m familiar and comfortable with VB2 so I used that.
Unless you’ve been living under a rock you know about VB. This has to be one of the best, and probably the best, DVD site on the ‘net. It offers a huge amount of material for the low price of a membership. I can’t imagine that there is another site that offers this kind of value.
There are a lot of good reasons to join VB: size and variety are the two biggest ones. There are almost 10,000 DVDs on the site now, with more being added daily. The site doesn’t concentrate on serving one fetish or niche to the exclusion of others either, but it serves many very well. There are members who complain when they don’t like an update, but I think that approach forgets that there are probably a lot of people who are pleased with the update. Also good are the options available to view the scenes: there are multiple download options depending on the quality you want or the size you can store, and streaming is also available. Download speeds are better than average.
The downsides to the site are pretty minor and probably mostly subjective. I find that they still seem to push quantity over quality, and I find a heavy reliance on lower-grade European material.
VB now offers four ‘premium channels.’ Evil Angel and Vivid were added quite a while ago and both now have a decent library available. These two were bundled for a while, which made for a great value, but now they are separate add-ons. That probably makes more sense given that these two studios offer vastly different material and likely have few customers who seek out material from both.
The two newest premium channels are Kink.com and Reality Kings. I didn’t add either of them on. I’m not really familiar with Reality Kings (though I have had a membership) so I can’t give a good opinion. As for Kink.com, if you’ve never been a member of any of their sites this would be a good way to access some stuff to sample it. There is a good sampling from many of their sites, such as The Training of O and Water Bondage.
Even with the few things I don’t like, VB is still likely my favorite porn site. It has so much to offer at such a low price that it is a no-brainer to join. Unlike other sites you don’t get a staggered membership at first – you get access to the probably the largest porn stash on the ‘net with no download limits. A membership here for a few months will give you a better collection than some porn shops have. It really does have something for everyone. |
|
05-04-11 01:33pm
Replies (10)
|
Reply
2771
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not really sure of how the poll would define "art nudes," but for a PU who likes BDSM and has a particular interest in girl-girl milk enemas I'd see "art nudes" as including sites like Nubiles and MetArt, so yes, occasionally I'm into "art nudes."
|
05-04-11 03:53am
|
Reply
2772
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Because of this chat we've been having, I watched a bunch of ALS stuff again just to remember how good it is. And it is good. One scene I remember getting a laugh out of starred Lexi Belle and another girl I can't remember. It was a photo shoot where the director gives them instructions (I like that) and at one point Lexi was on all fours and the other girl was using a dildo on her. The director said to the chick holding the dildo "Kiss her ass" and the chick gives him this hilarious look as if to say "No freaking way!" Then the director clarifies by saying "Just kiss her ass cheek." The reason I found that so funny is because I know what my reaction to that command would be! The next direction would be the director telling me to get my face of Lexi's ass because no one will want to see a bunch of pictures of the back of my head.
So the moral of the story is this: if you're a photographer and you want me to kiss Lexi Belle's ass, don't worry about having to ask twice. The problem may be in getting me out of there...
|
05-01-11 12:30pm
|
Reply
2773
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Imagine that! You being attracted to an under-40 woman. If I keep the pressure up maybe I can turn you into a complete pervert who ogles the 18-22 crowd! You can never have too many perverts you know...
|
05-01-11 12:14pm
|
Reply
2774
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
The public videos with body paint are really fun to watch. Those are all favourites of mine.
|
04-29-11 08:26pm
|
Reply
2775
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm with you on the shower/bath thing. When I joined ALS I did it mostly for the public stuff. There was enough of it there that I was completely satisfied even though I didn't download a lot of material.
|
04-26-11 06:40pm
|
