| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
In my opinion it starts from 3 on 1. Two's not a gang ;)
|
05-14-11 02:13am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
A gang of 2? No. That would mean that having a partner means you've formed a gang.
|
05-14-11 02:34am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
Two's a couple
Three's a crowd
Four on the sidewalk is not allowed.
|
05-14-11 04:22am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
B/B/G is just a threeway. Three would be an absolute minimum for a gangbang.
|
05-14-11 04:46am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral :
In porn categorizing anything is possible though. B/G/G is not usually considered bisexual while a single male is enough to label content as gay.
|
05-14-11 05:05am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
No, the same thing applies to two couples having sex not being an orgy.
|
05-14-11 06:25am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
badandy400 (0)
|
When all are focused on one person and there are more people than that person could normally handle. There needs to be a at leas a small line, taking turns. A girl with three guys, double penetration and oral would not count because there is no wait.
|
05-14-11 10:44am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Thagnutt (0)
|
Maybe.
I think multiple-partners is non-intimate & not a turn-on. They're not being slutty because they're ho's - & are insensitive to it. But it's subjective.
|
05-14-11 12:44pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
Sure, why not? If there can be "an Army of one", why not a gangbang of one? Where the girl fits into this is not clear.
|
05-14-11 02:11pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Capn (0)
|
Surely anything more than 2 can be considered a gang?
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-15-11 04:13am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
I've always associated "gang-bang" with using force by a bunch guys against the will of the victim.
Of course the porn industry has a knack for reinventing.
|
05-15-11 10:21am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Denner (0)
|
Hey, not really - think about it: is two girls/models a "gang".
Bottom line: a gang-bang is to this user - several models - and oh, yes several male participants - not a great fan........a few sites did hit the fan, though.
|
05-15-11 10:46am
Reply To Message
|
13
|
pat362 (0)
|
I think everyone as already touched on the point that 2 guys one girl isqa threeway. You need at least 3 or more guys to one girl fo4 a gang bang.
|
05-15-11 11:00am
Reply To Message
|
14
|
elonlybuster (0)
|
It's not really a gang bang at all. A gang would be 3 or more people working together, in the situation it's just the 2 guys working on the girl. It's simply a threesome, nothing else.
|
05-15-11 05:54pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
dave daniels (0)
|
that's a party not a gang bang!
|
05-15-11 06:02pm
Reply To Message
|
16
|
yote78 (0)
|
I suppose it could be, but I myself wouldn't consider it so. It really has to be a/l three guys.
Actually , I don't really like the connotation of "gang bang." To me, it implies that the girl is having sex against her will...otherwise known as rape...and I don't get into that at all.
|
05-17-11 04:13pm
Reply To Message
|
17
|
slategrey (0)
|
I will put that in the three-way category not the gangbang one.
|
05-24-11 09:57am
Reply To Message
|
