| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
07-02-14 03:11pm (Update History)
Reason: Thought score maybe a bit too low, weighing the quantity of the material that the site has to offer.
|
| Pros: |
Content Quantity. As of July, 2014 Beach Hunters indicates to non-members of amassing well over 3,600 "full-size” video clips. Now that may sound a lot, but take in account these videos are in 3 different formats (avi, mpg, mp4, wmv) counted as separate videos.
Content Categories. Videos and photos are set in categories so that members can easily find material to their preference. Categories are as follows: sex on the beach, foreplay, nudism topless, change room, not straight.
Content Variety. Every body form imaginable, age (within legal limits of course) and sexual orientation is captured on site. Beachhunters' videographers seem to have no scruples on what they capture on the beach; skinny, curvy, wrinkly, morbidly obese, it's all here. |
| Cons: |
Photos. Photos are very poor quality screen shots.
Editing. Many clips contain 3 plus minute of no activity, where the subjects are on their backs barely moving an inch. A great deal of editing could be used in the majority of their videos for the lack of activity as well as shaky hands syndrome, however Beachhunters seem to opt in using their editing talents into chunking up their videos in order to extend their library quantity, with no consideration given to their quality. Sadly this seems to be a common practice among these type of voyeur sites.
Sound. Videographers don't seem to be aware of the concept of self-noise, meaning when they move their equipment, it gets fairly loud. Do they know where the volume switch is on their equipment?
Recycling. Currently outside from membership access, I have visited their site to see if they in they had any fresh material worth to join up again and have noticed from their latest screen shots, they are reposting material from years ago! |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into photos and not much into videos, don't bother with this site. However despite the site's extremely poor edited content, they do have plenty of material for at least one month's membership, however due to its recycling of content, I wouldn't go further than that or ever consider going back again. |
|
07-02-14 03:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Review
This review says it all. I was a member in 2013 and nothing has changed in terms of quality in content and the incredibly poor editing distribution practices. Would score them a bit lower though just for the editing alone.
|
06-05-14 02:31pm
|
Reply
3
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Comment
Very accurate review. Beach Hunters really should stop their deceiving edits.
|
04-27-14 04:03pm
|
Review
4
|
Beach Voy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent high-resolution photo sets of gorgeous women.
Predominately Nude.
Mostly exclusive content. |
| Cons: |
Has not updated in years.
No Zip Files.
Not many videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an image site. Don't bother to put any money down if you're here for the videos, because they're fairly sparse in quantity. Definitely worth at least one month's membership. Wouldn't bother for 2. |
|
06-05-14 02:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
5
|
Enrique's Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
Yost70's Comment
Also photos consist of blurred out edited faces galore, which ruins the experience.Not many image sets when compared to other sites of the same genre. Plus no zip files. SAVE YOUR MONEY.
|
06-05-14 03:02pm
|
Review
6
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
06-05-14 02:35pm (Update History)
Reason: With a reflective comparison to other voyeur beach sites. A higher score just seemed more reasonable.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent amount of videos containing some gorgeous women.
Some decent quality in HD videos in their more recent years.
They do not recycle their content.
Great quality in pic resolution, offering true sets. |
| Cons: |
Sone of their real old videos (plus 5 years or so) are so tiny, makes one wonder, "Why bother?"
I think in their advertisements, they're really underselling in the amount of nude material available on site. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have an affinity for voyeur sites, and from my experience. These guys are the best out there. Worth the money. |
|
06-05-14 07:35am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
7
|
The Sandfly
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Reply
Yes... incredibly ridiculous... and I concur regarding ilovethebeach.com, as far as I know, they're the best out there in this genre.
|
06-13-14 01:55pm
|
Reply
8
|
The Sandfly
(0)
|
Reply of
TheMoreYouKnow's Reply
Latest news update on site, some reiteration passed on from Carlito's last comments, just passing forward to prospective users.
Project Mayhem: Sandfly 2.0
"The Plan....
Over the next few months theSandfly will be undergoing major restructuring - A slicker interface, more comprehensive navigation options to cover our expanding sections, and and upgrade of video files and players.
All this work will take place in the background. There will be NO disruption to your normal service. There will be NO increase in pricing. There will be only more and more exciting content added as per usual.
What This Means For YOU... The Plan...
Around October 2014 (or earlier) theSandfly.com 2.0 will be ready. The site video content will be fully compatible with ALL platforms - desktop, laptop, tablets, and MOBILE, including an implant which allows, by telekenesis, 3D projection of any video onto your woman's ass while you bang her *.
* this implant may take a few hundred years to develop, but everything else will be running by October..."
So please continue to enjoy our content, knowing that in the near future you will never be without it anywhere. ;))"
I'm not a belligerent super-troller. I just call it how I see it, and what I see here in this site's above statement is an admittance to some of its current fallbacks, but with a current initiative in place on improving itself. Hopefully it rings true...
|
05-07-14 01:32pm
|
Reply
9
|
The Sandfly
(0)
|
Reply of
CarlitoB's Reply
My comments are well warranted and I happily welcome more quality conscientious customers, like myself, visit your site and pay tribute of their 5 cents on pornusers. The site has some original content and I do believe it's getting bigger by the month for sure, just not enough to substantiate a decent site. Still if you look at as a whole, it consists of mostly random porn pics. And "Serial Killers"... really? The only picture set category of one scene and it's only available in a streaming video slide show? Shouldn't be so chintzy with the jpgs, man... Your site is inexpensive than most, a good thing too, because it's predominately comprised of 3rd party content that could easily be grabbed from free sites...end of story.
|
05-06-14 03:55pm
|
Reply
10
|
The Sandfly
(0)
|
Reply of
CarlitoB's Reply
A most highly entertaining response. Thank you, Carlito. First, I made no reference toward the retro shots, comments of low resolution images and videos were all aimed at your farmed 3rd party random free images and vids... My guess from flickr.com and xvideos.com. Second, No cheesy in video commentary or captions? Two words..."Santa's Vacation (2014-EP4)." Please rebuttal...
BTW after reading your response, along with "predominate" farmed content, going through an HTML course...Next to put on the list... try using "spell check!" And yes, your site actually has the farmed low-res images free pictures from other sites (poorly not entirely cropped out site logos even at times, quite hilarious actually, which brings to question... If you had their permission to use their images and videos, why don't you have their high resolution full-pay versions? Hmmm... Nice try Carlito. You gave me a good laugh.
|
05-06-14 01:05am
|
Reply
11
|
The Sandfly
(0)
|
Reply of
CarlitoB's Reply
Members CANNOT download the videos via simply using any of the free vidoe downloader programs, I've tried. However for $49 FLV Spider Pro seems to be able to get the job done, besides the webmaster needs to gain some skills. Also navigation forward/backward buttons and downloadable vids are the norm, seriously seek help...the site is extremely ghetto.
|
04-26-14 07:47pm
|
Review
12
|
The Sandfly
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Has a few decent photo sets of original content. |
| Cons: |
Majority of the site’s content is ripped from other sites (the low res free sample content versions), such as beachhunters, beachvoy, joypicz as well as others for sure.
In terms of site format, it’s pretty horrible. It doesn’t have optional zip files for pics, nor does it even provide a forward/backward buttons to navigate within its pages!
Regarding its dismal limited in quantity of original content, pic and vid quality ranges from decent to awfully tiny. Lastly videos are only available to stream on site… WTF!!!
Also original content videos is peppered with large, cheesy unnecessary captions and comments, which is a superb reflection of the overall quality and character of the website. |
| Bottom Line: |
It would appear the majority of the site's content consists of random low res pics and vids that were farmed from other sites (legitimately? who's to say). In short, stay clear from this site; it’s simply not worth the money. |
|
04-26-14 07:36pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
13
|
Voy Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
TheMoreYouKnow's Review
Update: Just to confirm on this date, the earliest posted video in 2014 is February 14 vise February 5 on the date of my review, which confirms that voyzone.com periodically removes its content to recycle in again later as "fresh" content... very devious.
|
06-13-14 12:57pm
|
Review
14
|
Voy Zone
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Update Frequency: Updates Daily
Video Resolution Quality: Fairly decent ranging from 720X576 to 1280X720.
Image Quantity: There are an incredible amount of photos on site.
Subject Matter: Some gorgeous women captured in the available content. |
| Cons: |
Image Set Quality: Images are random, not at all visually tied together in a given scene and are by average 4X6” in size, pretty small for a pay site. Also to note many of the images are low res versions from other pay sites, such as BeachVoy.
Overall Business Practice: Incredibly poor due to blatant deception in advertisement in updates and distribution/recycling of material.
Video Quality In Terms of Content: Majority of the videos are in dire need of editing, since many of them have minutes of inactivity.
Price: Way over priced considering the content given quantity and quality of material. |
| Bottom Line: |
Before even deciding on investing 30 bucks on a month with Voy-Zone.com, I noticed the “Last Updates” indicated on their non-member main page were all given (current month/year, but no exact date of entry) when hovering over them individually with the mouse. Suspicion ran over me, telling that these images/videos were not really updates at all, rather these images were the same and the dates were automatically set to change with the current month. So I waited till the next month passed and sure enough, the same images stayed on page, but their attached month auto-adjusted to the current month.
Video Count: 462 video clips (some are however repeats).
Despite this blatant deception toward prospective customers, I was still curious what content was held within their site, and thought maybe Voy-Zone’s page intro was simply a by-product a lazy web management and thought perhaps they still held some exclusive fresh content that maybe worth while, so I still forked over my 30 bones to see what’s up.
First impressions… Once joining Voy-Zone.com, and logging in, the site’s main page was completely different, filled with actual updates with complete dates of when they were posted. As to whether this material has been recycled from any previous posts, I would consider to be quite feasible, due to the fact there’s a huge gap of time where no posted material is to be found on site! Strangely enough between September 9, 2011 and February 5, 2014, there was absolutely no material to be found inside their video collection. Also to note, what little material that has been left on site posted in 2011 has been reposted in 2014! With this in mind, it’s an easy guess that periodically material is withdrawn from the site, then probably reposted later in the site in order to keep material fresh as well as keeping customers from downloading the majority of their archive in a month’s membership. Also if you’re more into high quality image sets (i.e. related pics of a particular scene), than movies of beach voyeurism, stay clear from this site, the image “sets” here are pretty much random unconnected pics, by average 4X6” in size, fairly poor in resolution given their from a pay site.
EDITING: Many of the movies are riddled with mouth breather moments, that being many of these 3 plus minute clips contain women on their backs barely fidgeting an inch, all the while they could have simply taken a photo which would’ve consumed hundreds of megabytes less than a video… It’s often a wonder at times to think if these guys ever consider the topic of conceptual editing; meaning if nothing is happening in a half minute or so through a scene, hit the pause button or at least edit it out the inactivity in the material later when the footage has been captured. And these guys definitely have plenty of experience in editing software, since much of the footage has been divided into individual clips in order to increase appearance of having more content, a common practice among voyeur sites.
QUANTITY VS QUALITY: To say that all Voy-Zone films are like the ladder would be unfair, there are some nice gems scattered through out and about 1 out of 10 films are hard drive keeper worthy, at least to my standards not sparing the smiles and womanly curves, while the rest are simply mouth breather fillers kept on site, just so that it would appear their collection is immense in size: mission accomplished. As of June 04, 2014, to my count there were 462 video clips, including some repeated material peppered within the sets.
De ‘Rena, who has distributed content on other sites, actually captures the best material on site, but still at times have moments of stagnant mouth breather scenes, also having tendencies of attention deficit disorder (ADD) moments with the camera shifting away from main subject at hand toward random uninteresting views, then shifting back toward main subject; this probably is due to the lack of activity with subjects not being in motion, but for the viewer (at least to me) these odd shifts get quite annoying, and the answer again to resolve these mouth breather moments and odd off-base subject shift, is that good ol’ fashion pause button, patience, and/or perhaps the use of editing software as well. Also repeated posts of the same material are not uncommon to find.
VOLUME: Also another tip, lowering the volume is quite an effective measure in reducing self-noise which is another annoyance entirely on its own.
RATING SYSTEM: Each page does provide users a means to rate the material, however there is no way to see the accumulation of others' ratings. The accumulation of these ratings apparently determine the “Top 7 Video Sets” of the site, but unfortunately there’s no optional page viewing system given to see material rated from best to worst, which would be an ideal feature as well.
In short, this is a pass due to their price is a bit steep considering the limited quantity of quality movies on site. |
|
06-05-14 07:13am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
15
|
Voy Zone
(0)
|
|
06-04-14 03:47pm
Replies (0)
|
|
