| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Girl Girl
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality lesbian porn only letdown by no longer updating
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Picture sets are good and downloadable
Creative scenes that only make it worse that they’re not updating
Small site so it is easy to navigate
All models are knockouts |
| Cons: |
Less than 100 scenes and no longer updating.
I could see some complaining about it being too glossy and glam. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian sites rarely impress me. It is a genre of porn that to me, all but makes itself successful. More than one naked woman in every scene. Women being naughty with other women. The only ones not into that are probably not looking for porn.
The bad news is pretty big. The site isn’t updating and hasn’t updated in over a year. That is a problem. It is still sold as a standalone site. If you are planning on joining the site for full price be aware that you will only get around 80 scenes and nothing else. The good news is that’s really all you can complain about with the site.
The models are cute, pretty, some innocent, all naughty. The clothing ranges from normal clothes to lingerie and the stories for the scenes are realistic enough. There is no download limits and the videos are all available in 4K downloads. There are the usual 1080p and 720p resolutions for downloads as well. The settings are pretty and classy looking. That may be a con to some people. It’s like a lesbian artsy site, but the action is very hardcore for lesbian. The picture sets are well-lit and can be downloaded.
Navigation is simple thanks to the small size of the site. You will have no problem finding what you’re looking for. If you lik glam porn you’ll love these scenes, but if not, you won’t likely like it.
Lesbian porn like this can be confusing. They do a good job of showing the scenes as classy, but the action is anything but classy. There are 69s, anal play, toys and fingers all in a 5 minute segment of a video. The kissing is good and a major focus. There’s very few things sexier than two pretty women kissing passionately.
I would have trouble recommending this site by itself. You would probably get your money’s worth, but if you can add Jules Jordan at a discounted price, it’s a better deal and is the deal I joined. The stories and scenarios add quite a bit of value to the scenes. I still have problems recommending it to anyone except lesbian fans. I really wish they would restart the site and add new scenes. It would be a site that easily pushes a high 90s score if it was still updating, but as it is, I feel comfortable giving it an 85. |
|
01-10-23 02:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Perv Therapy
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No niche has been more overlooked in porn than mental therapy.
Around 40 scenes.
Includes access to 4 other sites.
*Warning Pro* My membership included downloads. I believe it depends on how you join (email, promo, directly).
Up to 4K downloads on the videos. Also includes HD downloads,
Easy cancel through Epoch |
| Cons: |
I expected cheesy plotlines, but instead received cheesy and corny.
Possibly have to abide by certain standards due to the sensitive nature of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine my excitement when I saw a porn site based on mental therapy. I then came back to reality and realized there are so many rules and regulations around the field it would likely be very limited in what all it covers. I have been working in the mental sciences for over 10 years and there has been more than one case of uncomfortable sexual tension in my office and nearly every therapist will tell you the same. There’s something about getting people to open up and talk about emotions that often leads right into sex.
With that said – this is porn and it’s made by the people at Team Skeet. That comes with some big positives like extremely high quality videos and pictures, but you will note my warning pro. I joined with no promo and am sure I paid a little more, but did receive downloading ability. The videos are downloadable up to 4K, but I only download the 720p or 1080p files. The videos are clear and well-lighted. That could have been a problem as some therapists keep their offices dark. The pictures are high quality and a nice, medium lighting/color.
You also receive access to these sites: This Girl Sucks, Teeny Black, CFNM Teens and My Babysitter’s Club. Each of those are good sites with pretty models and mostly cute and playful themes. I do believe each of those sites have been standalone sites before, but the updates have now either stopped or are rare. It is a good way to get access to these other sites.
What can you do with a perverted therapist site? Not a lot. More times than not, in real life, it’s the patient not the therapist that loses control of their emotions. Most of these scenes show the “mentally superior” therapist using their mental superiority to convince the younger patient to have sex with them. Not a complete miss since it is the first time I’ve seen porn try the therapy genre, but it’s not a hit, either. The scenes are reminiscent of most older/younger porn scenes. There’s no real (would be funny) seduction through therapy or even related to therapy. Still, good try and would like to see where they take this idea.
That can be a problem for this porn company. They have some really good ideas, but seem to be quick to give up on their ideas. This one is entertaining enough to keep an eye on it. The other 4 sites are worth mentioning for what they are – bonus add-on sites. I would recommend it to anyone that is interested in any of the included sites. |
|
11-28-22 02:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly |
| Cons: |
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar. |
|
11-28-22 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of mostly teen hardcore porn.
More than 20 sites included.
Cute, pretty, almost exclusively slim and slender models.
The different sites work as the navigation. Each site covers a themed niche.
Newer videos are downloadable in 4K
Nearly daily update across the network. |
| Cons: |
When you’re pretty, sexy, slim, young, you don’t have to be a good actress!
The humor is often not meant to be humor. That’s a good con. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has been one of the most popular mega networks since I started joining porn sites. I’m going to lay out the main thought I have with the network. If you like slim, young, pretty, sexy young women you’re going to like this network. I don’t know if the niches or fetishes beyond looks even matter.
The technical parts of the network tick all the boxes. Up to 4K downloads. Zip files for picture downloads. HD videos if you don’t want the 4K ones. Navigation is simple thanks to the different sites working as categories or niches. They also are updating nearly daily. The price is cheap too.
The not as obvious major problem I have with the network is the languages and lack of subtitles and even attempting to act. Most of these models would be just as believable and interesting if they didn’t try to act.
Despite having the different niches and sites, there’s not a lot different between the scenes. That to me is the big negative. This is porn how porn used to be. The most important part is the looks and allure of the models. Different people will feel differently about that, but I am mentioning it despite a high score. This is one of those networks that you can see does everything right. The negatives are going to be different, more or even less per member. The first site I joined years ago was Nubiles.net. The content here reminds me of the hardcore content on Nubiles. That is a compliment in that the models are pretty and quality is high, but there doesn’t seem to be much chemistry between the people having sex.
The different sites and niches could also be improved. Most of these sites have the same style of porn on them with one slight difference – for example, creampies. Other sites have a different action that is excluded in the scenes on their other sites like anal sex. I beieve a network like this one does show the limitations on porn. You have a couple ways of making a successful porn site. One is with high quantity and quality. That’s what Teen Mega World is focused on. The models’ looks make up for the poor acting.
With all this said, I doubt I will join it again and that’s even with me rating it a 90. It’s just not what I look for in porn, but I know it’s what a lot of Porn Users do look for. Just be sure and check out the content before joining. |
|
11-28-22 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An oddly-addictive network that has had me as a member multiple times over the last few years.
Hardcore, lesbian and group sex. The group sex is the selling point for me.
Comes with 15 other sites.
Videos and pictures are downloadable and unlimited on downloads.
Weekly updates.
Down to Earth, women next door types. |
| Cons: |
I believe the looks of the models could be a con for some. Though not promoted as an alternative site, the women often dress alternatively and are tattooed.
No 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
Pegas Productions has a very underrated network on their hands. I decided to re-review it after I noticed I scored it only 77 on my previous review of it. The word underrated feels right now, but I could easily see some people using underwhelming. It’s mosly based on the looks of the women. You’re not going to see models that look like models. There’s not much glamour. I do believe that merges a fine line between believable hardcore and realistic hardcore. It always seemed a little bipolar to me to have those perfect 10 models posing then moments later having a dual penetration scene. You won’t see that on Pegas. Most of the women look like and act like they’re as much into the scenes as the men are.
This network could be a shining example of why we shouldn’t review a site or network after just one month of membership. I scored it a 77, but have been a member of it for four other memberships. I have warmed up to the content. I do believe it’s a perfect show of the models looks aren’t going to sell you on the network. It took me a little time and getting used to their shooting or filming style.
The video quality is excellent, but no 4K. There are 720p and 1080p downloads plus the photos are downloadable. The site is nearing 1,000 scenes and over 500 photo sets. Add to those the 15 other sites and you can see there’s a lot of content to keep you occupied and busy.
Of the other sites, I recommend these:
Kinky Frenchies, Fun Sized Teens, Inked Gurlz and Fresh and Innocent. Just like the overall content, it takes a little time to warm up to the different genres and niches, so give it some time. As an entire network, this is comparable to all the big and known networks. The added bonus is you haven’t seen more than a few of these models before and maybe, if like me, I’ve never seen these models on other sites. That goes into taking some time to warm up to the content. You start to realize this content is relatively obscure.
The navigation could be improved, but I also believe that’s subjective. It’s just not as easy to use as other similar networks. I found myself back-clicking several times which is never a good sign. It’s a good network and one I consider one of my favorites now as can be seen by the 13 point boost in my score. |
|
11-26-22 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
VIPissy
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big, exclusive fetish site.
Over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and lots of sex and orgasms.
Up to 4K downloads and HD downloads.
Photos are clear and downloadable.
No download limits in new weekly updates. |
| Cons: |
Needs more focus on showing and explaining the pissing fetish. It’s much more complex than porn makes it seem to be.
Some scenes are disappointing just because the fetish seems to get forgotten. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember when I first talked to a pee fetishist. I was surprised to know that sound is a major part of the fetish. I didn’t say I’m going to explain it, but now that you know, it does make you question why sites like this one don’t point out the sound part. I also found out there’s a mixture of fetishists that cannot agree on their favorite part. Some like the model to be nude with legs spread while pissing, while others want her wearing pants that show the pee soaking the pants.
If none of this sounds interesting do not worry. I also don’t think any of that sounds interesting or arousing, but I really enjoyed this site. The site has over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and hardcore sex, usually all in the same scene. It’s straightforward sex that aims to focus on the woman’s lower half of her body. I have noticed pissing fetishists also often like legs, hose and feet porn too. You will see those in these scenes. Which makes sense since the pee runs down the legs.
The sex is hardcore and as good as any site. And other than the focus on pissing for a few seconds in each scene, the porn is just a lot like any other porn. That’s why the pissing adds or subtracts to the content. For me, it adds to the content. Peeing is a private act that has been a fetish for hundreds of years due to the taboo of the act.
It also is a fetish that works with “porn” since it focuses on the pussy. It seems to be one of the most perfect fetishes for showcasing porn sex in it. The newer videos have 4K downloads and the videos have HD 1080p and 720p downloads as well. The pictures are downloadable in zip packs.
I did make a deduction for the lack of explanatory scenes. It seems like it would be easier for these fetish-type sites to make 8-10 videos that focus on showing the different arousal points of the fetish. As it is, I attempt to figure out the parts that arouse me more than the other parts. There could be more explanation about the different arousals based on the gender that is pissing, as example. I believe it would add immense value to the porn to understand the hows and whys of the fetish. They do everything else well enough. It’s a good value even by itself with no bonus content. |
|
11-26-22 05:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Cuck Hunter
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unexpected gem of a network.
Eight sites are included. Nearly all mainstream niches are covered.
High quality video downloads including 4K on newer videos.
Easy to use even though it could be easier.
Regular updates
Good download options. |
| Cons: |
It should advertise as a network. I’m reviewing the site I joined to gain access, and there doesn’t seem to be any mention of the network that comes with a membership.
The navigation will likely leave some wanting more features. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Cuck Hunter for my growing interest in the Cuckold niche, but ended up getting a network that is much better than I expected. Cuck Hunter is exactly what I expected. It’s a standard cuckold site where the wife has sex with another man while her husband and/or cuck watches. It’s a niche beyond a niche. There’s something highly erotic about the cuck watching and masturbating.
If cucks aren’t an interest to you there are 7 more sites and varied niches including transsexuals, nude athletic scenes, lesbian and light exhibitionism.
The network is full of surprises like the 4K video downloads. It has nearly 2,200 scenes across the network and all can be downloaded with no limits. If I felt any disappointment, it was that there weren’t more cuckold scenes. Being a relatively scarce niche makes finding quality scenes like a treasure hunt, and I would trade 1,000 of the videos for 100 more cuckold scenes. I like the different niches they cover, but maybe it’s just me – I sign up for a site or network because the niche interests me.
The most important pro may also be the most important con. The blends of different niches is a good change of pace, but only transsexual is covered in-depth with over 500 scenes. Each of the niches have at least 80 scenes with all but one having at least 100 or more scenes. That is a pro and con. It may not be enough of a niche if you’re new to it, and if it’s one you don’t like, 100+ scenes is a lot to just look over and not download.
For me, this network is excellent and I enjoy the varied niches, but I would warn against joining it just for one niche. This one works better if you like multiple niches they have. Transsexual has never been a favorite of mine, but I do like it and they have some very good transsexual scenes. I like and downloaded a little from each niche.
I believe this network is good for those that aren’t interested in the mainstream niches of porn and want something different. If nothing else you can try out niches that a lot of people are comfortable joining like transsexual and cuckold. The video quality is good all across the network. Th main change they could make to improve the sites and network is putting them all into one network. Otherwise, I believe they are asking for too many unfair complaints from those that join for one specific niche only to find out the amount of content for the niche is limited.
Overall, I highly recommend the network as long as you’re sure you want something different. |
|
11-06-22 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Slayed
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Erotic lesbian porn that’s not as nice as typical lesbian porn
Videos can be downloaded and all scenes have up to 4K downloads
Can be combined into a 7 site package deal for a good price.
Pretty and sexy models
Scenes are fun and have good production
Updates weekly |
| Cons: |
There is a download limit, but as of right now, the small size of the site makes the limit not a problem.
The small size of the site makes it questionable in value, but if you buy the 7 site bundle, the deal is a lot better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined the 7 site bundle and will just fil-in what is included with it. Besides Slayed, you also get Deeper, Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. The studio that owns this group of sites – Mad Cheddar – believes in several things. To start with, all their sites have the 25 downloads per week download limit. All their sites feature high production values and well, that’s not always a good thing. The bundle of sites does offer a broad range of genres and fetishes. The price for the 7 site bundle is $49.95. Slayed Is the newest of the Mad Cheddar sites and it is the only lesbian Mad Cheddar site. I’m going to say it’s not the best lesbian site I have joined, but it is a lot better than the lesbian sites you receive with the average porn network. It is a little kinkier and more hardcore than the sensual lesbian sites, but it still has high sensuality. I would like to see more group scenes, but this studio doesn’t do much with groups. The models are all very pretty and sexy. It’s a common problem, I think, with lesbian porn to want better camera angles. Lesbian porn is the one genre that could really benefit from multiple camera downloadable files. An important part of the Slayed scenes is the believable sexual tension between the models. I think lesbian porn is the easiest to fake, but I don’t feel like these scenes are faked, There is passion and lust in every scene. I don’t know if the producers allow the models to ad-lib, but the kinkiest parts of the scenes appear unplanned.
The download limit is acceptable to me, but that is pertaining to Slayed only. The site has under 80 scenes. With the 25 scene weekly download limit you can still download every video on Slayed in a month membership. As for the value of the site/network, as a site, it would be good for a one month membership. As a network, it is more up to the person, to decide if the 7 sites are worth $50. From my side of it, I think it’s overpriced at $50. I’m not that big of a fan of any of their sites except Slayed and Deeper. For me, it would be more sensible to just join those two.
There is a problem to me that will almost always land in the pros. The high production values. The problem with this studio is you get the samey feeling not just from scene to scene on the same site, but even across the different sites. I also believe that works against joining the 7 site bundle.
With all that said, Slayed is a great site for lesbian fans and the quality is excellent. I just don’t think the Mad Cheddar bundle is worth the price of it. I have joined Deeper twice before and really enjoy it. The other sites – minus Slayed – are too much of the same thing for my taste. These sites pigeonhole themselves and their creativity with the genres and sticking to them. It seems to be the biggest mistake I see in porn. Sex is rarely the same, but a lot of the Mad Cheddar scenes are exactly the same. |
|
11-06-22 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite site on my favorite network.
Women watching, joining, instructing a guy to masturbate. She’s usually clothed.
Comes with Pure CFNM, a full network of CFNM sites.
Believable very attractive females with average guys.
Unlimited downloadable videos and pictures.
The theme makes a story useless. You know the story just from what you see. |
| Cons: |
Tries too hard to stick to the CF part of CFNM.
Some scenes go into degrading the males. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has improved over the years. Most of the improvement is in the recognition of their scenes becoming redundant due to the CFNM genre. Adding Lady Voyeur to CFNM is, in theory, a perfect blend, but we are still talking about porn where men far outnumber female viewers. This niche sticks to one or more women watching a man masturbate. I’m sure there are men who wouldn’t enjoy this type of porn – especially when you factor in the degradation.
Having said that, Lady Voyeur, typically shows the female as being very aroused and even entertained while watching the man masturbate.
There are scenarios that pop up in every scene like will the guy’s cum hit the woman? Will the female get more involved? Will the female masturbate too? It’s one of the few niches that keeps an open window for what “could” happen in each scene.
There still is the problem of this type of porn doesn’t leave much room for a lot of fetishes or niches. While it is called Voyeur, it’s not really voyeur other than the woman watching the man. da room. There is nothing blocking the woman from seeing the man or him seeing her looking at him. That’s why I said the voyeur part Is questionable if it’s really voyeur.
You also get full access to Pure CFNM, by far and away, the biggest and best CFNM network. The downloads are unlimited and there are photosets with most scenes. I just enjoy the question of how involved will the female get in the scene. The scenes can be downloaded in high definition and the photos are high resolution. I do think they could make the scenes longer and add more variety to the Lady Voyeurs scenes, but it’s a minor complaint for a site that does a lot more right than wrong. The access to Pure CFNM is just a major bonus.
This is a great deal if you’re new to CFNM. While the different niches in the genre are limited, those are still enough to change things up so that you can enjoy it without feeling like it’s redundant. You’ll only be disappointed if you’re expecting intercourse or oral sex. Which is something I like about Lady Voyeurs, you will see the women tease those and maybe give the guy a little oral. It makes every scene worth watching from beginning to end. The key there is CFNM is not an action. Porn usually specifies its niche or genre by the name of the site like “Only Blowjob”. Pure CFNM just tells you there will be clothed females and nude males. The actions are not mentioned. |
|
10-11-22 07:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes? |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some. |
| Bottom Line: |
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too. |
|
08-09-22 09:56am
Replies (1)
|
Review
36
|
Strokies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Impressive handjob, tease and blowjob site.
Weekly update
575 scenes and the women are all above average in looks.
Every scene has 4K download option and 1080p.
Downloads are unlimited and included in membership.
Surprising to me, the newer scenes are better than the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
Seems to be using the same guys for most scenes. That becomes boring for me.
Older scenes are very short and more formulaic. |
| Bottom Line: |
Gay male sites have pushed me away. I decided to try this straight handjob site featuring some really pretty young women. Handjobs can be boring and repetitive. Just like solo male can be. You start realizing there’s just not a lot to do with the male body.
It's different for me to see the newer scenes improving in comparison to the older scenes. Most sites I have joined are the opposite of that. Most sites look like they start out strong, get bored and just start making the same scene over and over. This site has added some depth to the handjobs over the years. You get some edging, some frenulum play, very intense tongue teasing, it’s really good and sexy. I don’t know most of these models. The bios of the models lead me to believe they are mostly pro models, but I haven’t seen them before. Their names even look like pro models. Maybe they are, but at least they are attractive. The last straight handjob site I joined had a lot of average or below looking women. These women are a step or two up. The videos include some interview and talking before the handjob starts. Most of the models seem to have a set script they are building from.
The older scenes were mostly under 15 minutes. The newer scenes are over 20 and many are over 30 minutes. They have added some depth to the scenes. That, if nothing else, makes it seem like these women really enjoy giving a handjob. I do believe, with my limited knowledge, of the genre, that is very important.
I was shocked to see that every scene has HD and 4K downloads and there over 500 scenes. It’s not a brand-new site. Looks like it started in 2015. They have a weekly update every Friday. They also include photos and zip downloads.
The real attraction is those newer scenes that feature edging. I don’t think there’s many things in porn more exciting for a female than seeing the guy struggle through holding his orgasms only to finally get to release. That’s one of my favorite parts of porn. I could get by with cumshot compilations. The cumshots on Strokies are very good too. That leads to the negative. Even with the additions of edging and teasing, it's still just a handjob site. There are a lot of scenes where they female will also masturbate, but they could do so much more with that. I have to turn to tube sites to find mutual masturbation. Which is a very popular niche, but no one except amateurs seem to be doing it. Strokies comes the closest on mutual masturbation. They will have the female straddle the guy’s leg and hip area with her legs spread open and touching herself while she masturbates the guy with her other hand. Scenes like that would move the site up to my favorite if they did that more often. That is a very good niche to me.
I did mention in the cons there’s not a lot of different guys and that’s based just on the penis I can see. I feel like I know the guy at this point. I would recognize your dick from a crowd of dicks! That maybe hurts the site a little. I have heard of the term stunt cock before. That’s in hardcore sex where there are 8-10 positions per scene. There’s not much variation on a handjob site. The same penis right there in the camera view in every scene. Maybe dress it up in a little suit? I know that there are other women out there that feel the same way. You watch enough of these scenes and you will have seen this guy’s penis more than your boyfriend’s. Sorry about the joking around. There’s just not a lot to talk about in handjob porn. It's a very good site. I haven’t ever found that much attraction to handjob porn even though it seems like I should. I will come back to this one. It would be a good site to try out if you’re curious about handjob porn. It has enough variations to keep it from being strict handjob porn. |
|
07-11-22 09:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Bel Ami Online
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough. |
| Cons: |
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men. |
|
07-09-22 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Pink Label
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites. |
| Cons: |
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site. |
|
06-08-22 03:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
Crash Pad Series
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that fits unique and different from the mainstream.
Currently 345 scenes
Models are mostly amateur based on my knowledge of models. A few look familiar.
It’s nice to have Epoch as the biller since I wasn’t familiar with this site.
The Behind-the-Scenes videos are really interesting and have closed captioning and subtitles over the last 5 years.
A lot of variety in models which will be the first con as well. |
| Cons: |
Heavier built, tattoos, piercings, these models are more like everyday women, and I know that can be a con for some porn fans.
Overall video quality could be improved. Some of the newer scenes have 4K. A lot only have 360p. And each video only has one download option.
No dates or tags on the scenes. It’s hard to keep up with the various niches they cover without tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found a couple of sites by this company. They won some awards in the earlier part of 2005 for best dyke films. They had a Crash Pad in San Francisco that people would crash in and have sex. That’s more interesting to me than showing up at a studio to have sex for 18 minutes and 12 seconds. I was just looking for something different. I knew that likely wouldn’t turn out perfect.
It didn’t. But it turned out good enough. The main selling point here for me is the authentic sex and real people. Even real emotions. With that comes the reality of not everyone will find all of these models attractive.
The site itself could use some updates. If there are tags, I have not found them. It’s even kind of difficult to get started. I clicked through a few tabs just trying to find the scenes. I have been on a few sites like this one. There’s a learning curve that you will pick up and think it wasn’t that big of a deal once you figure it out. The search engine could be better, but I’m not for sure how. As I don’t know these models and wouldn’t know what to search for. You’re going to have to click and scan through to see if scenes or models catch your eye. I was originally concerned that there are no downloads, but there are. It’s just you only get one download option, and it can range from 360p to 4K. That fits the words needs updating. I don’t have a 4K monitor so 4K files are overkill for me. And 360p doesn’t look that good on any monitor.
Besides the need for updating, the site does a lot right including one of the broadest varieties of performers and niches I have seen. They have bi, trans, the specified “queer” content and it directed by Shine Louise Houston. That is something that could push some away as this does fall under feminist porn. I don’t consider myself a feminist even though I am a female in a male-dominated field. I’ve never really felt the need or desire to be a feminist. I do think that’s a risky word to label yourself with in a field like porn that has half a century steeped in male dominance. Some of the wording could make the site more difficult to understand. Femme, Boi, stud, it’s more than a switch to a different porn site. It’s more like you step into a whole other world.
The site has won a lot of awards and been nominated for others. I am counting 20 they have won or been nominated for. The realistic action is a big part of that. There’s no real fluff like you see in mainstream porn or the that couldn’t be further from realistic mainstream “reality porn”.
I do recognize several models especially Daisy Ducati who is one of my favorites from Kink. That is where several of the models are featured over on the Kink Network. I do wish they did a little more with the user features. Better video quality and tags would make a huge difference. I believe that a lot of sites like this one are as much aimed at mobile users as PC users. I can use either but do prefer PC. Some of the files are even named Ipad. I don’t think that’s a good plan. Why not give the better resolution that works on mobile and PC instead of the lower resolution that is hardly watchable on the PC?
I’m kind of torn on it. The quality of the action is really good. Your feelings about the attractiveness of the models will be subjective. That’s why I believe better user features would have improved everything. It's worth looking into if you’re looking for something different. If they improved the site’s features, I would be more likely to recommend it to everyone. I know how porn fans are. |
|
06-04-22 11:50pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
40
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Not for sure how much exploitation is going on, but most of these amateur girls wear the guys out in the scenes.
Long, fairly well-thought, enjoyable scenes that let you get to know a little about the model and see if she can perform better than she says. A resounding yes on many of those.
Pretty young women that if nothing else fit the college girl look and even attitude.
Videos have 1080p downloads.
Easy site to use, join and cancel.
Updates 5-6 times per month. |
| Cons: |
Watching the guys try to wear these young college girls out. Sorry Sailor, that boat sunk. You just paid her to do what she does every weekend for free, and she made you look bad while doing it. I’m just having fun, there’s a con in the preconceived notion the site creates with its name. Everyone in these scenes seems to be happy and enjoying every second of the exploitation.
The person that has to change the sheets on the same bed that every scene is filmed in. Ever think of the floor, guys? Bathroom? Balcony? |
| Bottom Line: |
I had to get a little creative with the cons as this site really doesn’t do much wrong. The guys come prepared, are decent enough looking and don’t get in the way. The girls like to talk. They are playful, some are shy and all are horny. It’s how I heard college works. How about a stressed out final exam scene? The excogi shortening of the name makes me think it’s trying to get away from the exploited name and tell us all these girls were in college but dropped out. It’s the ex-college girls. There is no way these young women have time to learn anything other than sex. And taking money from guys. It’s more profitable than a college degree.
Seriously, this site is a pleasant surprise for me and it’s one of those that you do enter with preconceived notions. I was expecting scenes that lasted 22 minutes and 16 seconds. Featured throughout those scenes were the common sex positions and they switched positions every 6 minutes and 23 seconds. I’m saying I was expecting dull, cookie-cutter porn. The girls are not having that. They do not want everyone at the college saying, “She should have stayed in college. She has no career in porn!” She’s making Magna Cum Laude.
Don’t let my inner-author take over or we’ll never get to the review. The scenes do a lot. There is some interview, some teasing, some playfulness, some shyness, some what I see as competitive jostling. You can tell these young women are not going to get wore out by these “old” men. I’m sorry to the guys in the scenes, but you all look old enough to be at least their professors. You can see the societal shift in these young women, in the newer scenes. The scene length is an important factor for me. As a nearing middle-age female, I can’t just get into a scene and have business taken care of in 22 minutes. I need a little time and warming up. These scenes regularly go over one hour and even over 90 minutes for one scene.
I am glad that it’s not 112 minutes of switching positions sex. There is enjoyment in watching how the female’s mind and arousal leads her responses to questions. You can see (or I can as a female) when the young woman is trying to speed things up signaling, she’s warm and ready. I do believe the guys or interviewer could make the scenes a little more interesting by teasing her once she’s aroused and ready. The scenes have an almost “date” like feel to them. Like the guy is trying to talk the young woman into sex. We know she is going to have sex, but if the interviewer could pick up on when the young woman stops thinking about “I’m being paid to do this” and shows the side that just wants to do it whether paid or not, they could have some of the best scenes ever seen.
These young women are extremely horny, and it can be seen. If someone can push those buttons this site would be upper 90s. They come close in some scenes. It may be that I’m asking too much. I thought the Aarora and Leana Threesome was very close to a perfect scene. I doubt that others would think that just by looking at a preview.
I now face the question of how many months would it take me to watch each scene fully? That is what is needed with this content. If you’re skipping much you would probably be better off with another site. It does seem to me you have to watch the entire scene. This is the type of hardcore content porn needs. It’s not dull, it’s not cookie-cutter and everyone seems to enjoy being in it.
The videos can be downloaded up to 1080p. There are pictures, too. They have over 900 scenes and update 5-6 times a month based on the last 3 months. There have around 700 models. I am going to say the number of amateurs is very high if not all. These look like college students not porn models.
I have enjoyed the site a lot and it’s one of those rare ones that I am going back to after I canceled it and planning on staying longer this time. |
|
05-11-22 04:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s included when you join Exploited College Girls and vice-versa.
Definite amateur models and a black couch that’s in the backroom.
Models are mostly pretty and a lot of them, especially newer ones, are funny and cute. There are over 700 models.
Scenes are full featured, is that a term? Interview, tease, sex, it’s all in one scene.
Updates a little more than once per week, I’m counting around 6 per month.
Good blend of models (race, body types, kinkiness level) |
| Cons: |
It's similar to Exploited College Girls, there’s really not a lot they are doing wrong. They do have a download limit listed, but I haven’t hit it. It looks high to me with 25GB per day. I’m not a hoarding downloader. I download what I know I can watch.
Shouldn’t it be repetitive if the women are amateurs and new to the porn field? There seems to be a line you can’t cross with newbies to porn modeling. I think the viewer accepts that to get to see new, fresh models. |
| Bottom Line: |
These two sites – Backroom Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls are a real find for me. I seem to only want to stay in my comfort zone of mostly glam, softer content and it’s not for lack of trying. I have tried many hardcore sites and wished I hadn’t. These sites walk that fine line between, “You’re trying to see how much of her innards you can pull out” and “That’s just two people have fun, passionate sex.” It may be because I’m a woman. This site does it as well as Exploited College Girls.
The models are probably a bigger deal to females than males. I know that sounds dumb since I’m not a lesbian, but it’s not just about looks. I think as a woman, I want to think young women just kind of stumble into porn. Like I did the backseat of that guy’s car in college. These scenes give me that feeling. The ladies do a good enough job of showing up in what looks like a casual outfit for a job interview. The guys are not enough asshole to make me feel like they’re really trying to exploit these young women. As I told in the Exploited College Girls review, the girls wear the guys in the newer scenes. It’s nice to see the shift happening in porn. It didn’t have to be a major shift. It could be progressive to show women can be horny too. It does make me laugh since these guys are handing money out. Maybe someone could make a porn site where they have a bet with the woman. If they can get her to have sex without pay, then she won’t ask for pay. You know the webmasters would be all for that. They’re placing personal ads for smooth-talking men. I have always believed that pay takes away from the realism in porn. Maybe everyone does have a price. That is where typical hardcore does not do well with me. I start thinking there’s no way she agreed to this. She’s just doing it to get her money. That loses me. This site and Exploited College Girls, don’t give me that feeling.
The scenes can be downloaded in HD. There are pictures. The navigation is basic and simple as it should be for a site like this. I find looking at each woman to be one of the most interesting parts. A lot of these women do not look like they have plans to be in 10,000 porn scenes. I do believe the most interesting is when you get the woman that looks like she shouldn’t be in porn, and I mean that in the way that she looks like a potential Hollywood actress. You also get the other side of that woman would probably shoot a new scene every week.
The tags work well even though I don’t use them. I just start at the beginning and pick 6-10 scenes to download and watch over a week period. I think considering they give you this site and Exploited College Girls this could be a long term join for me. If you combine the sites, they are updating 12 times a month and have over 1,500 scenes between the sites. They do give you a third site too. I haven’t checked the third site out just because of the name. It’s Black Ambush. That has the sound of every site that has turned me away from hardcore. I will eventually check it out, but for now I’m happy with Exploited College Girls and Backroom Casting Couch.
I would definitely recommend joining either and getting both to any porn fan. I did score Exploited College Girls a little higher, but you get both sites so there’s no reason to prefer one of the other when you can have both. |
|
05-11-22 04:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Looks like a site has been forgotten. Sexy, teasing, “I think” amateurs.
There are nearly 700 models and most look new to me.
Downloadable movies and picture sets.
It’s a large site with over 6,000 picture sets and videos. It updates daily.
Movies can be downloaded up to 1080p.
Good site for straight or curious women with nothing close to “offensive” happening. |
| Cons: |
This site has been around a long time. I used to think it was a stream-only site. I believe Nubiles used to advertise for it and the launch date coincides with my first time joining Nubiles in 2009. The site’s name may be the biggest con. It doesn’t sound like porn. Sounds like a video game or your weird aunt’s soup recipe.
There’s not a lot of explicit nudity. There’s plenty of nudity, it’s just not gynecological. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not going to be that critical of the content as I found it quite good. I am going to be critical of their marketing. I have heard of this site for more than 10 years, but never joined it. I don’t even think I ever looked at a preview. It’s a really good site. It reminds me of a photo site, kind of artsy, but they do stress there isn’t much makeup. They’re not going for glamour. It’s women next door and that’s not girls, because some of these females are probably in their 40s. If not, don’t say anything, so I don’t have to name which ones look 40s to me. There is a little bit of hesitancy on my part. This is a large site, but it has been around since 2009. I’m a little hesitant and dare I say – gunshy, after reviewing a site awhile back and finding out they recycled the entire site from old updates. This one has new updates everyday and that’s either really impressive or someone is slipping one over on me. An update everyday after being open for 13 years deserves some credit.
What you mostly get with this site is women dressed normally and doing normal things. I think it’s normal for young, pretty women to strip in the shower. That sounds strange. I don’t know anyone that takes showers in their clothes. A site like this, to me, appeals to straight women. Especially those of us that are nearing middle-age. Some of these women could teach a thing or two about being sexy. It’s not weighed down by she needs to get naked and masturbate or have sex. I believe when you give a woman the job of being sexy without sex, you get her best sexy show. She knows she has to make it count.
The question becomes is that porn? Good question. I think it is. A lot of the stripping is in panties, thongs, and it’s not stripping for stripping class. It’s stripping for arousing someone else or teasing. I just don’t think it adds up to the current porn we see. That doesn’t help my questioning of if the content is potentially recycled. It really fuels it. I haven’t seen porn like this since the first sites I joined around 2009-2010. I do apologize to them if I am talking too much about recycling. I hope it could help others interested in the site. That also should be mentioned, I don’t see any 4K scenes. That’s porn’s fault for trying to establish 4K as the standard. Now, anytime I don’t see 4K scenes, I start to wonder if the scenes are older and re-released.
The models are really hit or miss for me. I do believe they are going to be a major part of how you feel about this site. Some, Naomi Moon, comes to mind, are knockouts. While some, I won’t name them, look like the woman that delivered my groceries. That’s a big disparity between models. I will mention that Naomi Moon’s bio on the site definitely tells that it’s new content. She is from Ukraine and the bio says Ukraine is in news for “other” reasons. I wish someone else was a member or could explain why this site does not feel like a 2022 site. Maybe their webmaster knows? I know the more teasing nature of the content could be giving me the older feel from older sites. The styles of clothing could be from poorer countries than what I’m used to. That is what makes the site interesting to me, but I still can’t say it's the porn part that makes it interesting.
The teasing is cute, though some of these women look older than me and I would hope if they’re older than me they know better than to waste their time and years on teasing. I like Yassa Mare’s content a lot.
I believe it takes more to impress without full nudity than it does to impress with full nudity and 7 men having their way with you. I really can’t say who I would recommend this content to. Those that like normal woman? That is what I feel like I’m looking at. It makes women like Naomi Moon really stand out on the site. It’s mostly just normal, fun, women stripping and looking pretty. I don’t know who that would be recommended to. Maybe that’s why the site isn’t well-known? I will say if these normal women were willing to do masturbation, I think it would be a real winner site. They look more like the women that buy the 5 inch dildo AND lube. Innocence is not age-related, it’s experience-related.
I think I’ve talked myself into understanding what’s going on with this site. It’s like it has never progressed and they’re just doing what they’ve always done. I would really consider trying to progress this some. You have women in wet shirts looking at the camera like, “My shirt is wet!” Guys in 2022 would say, “Did you spill your drink?” The nipples showing would just go over their head. You have to be more blunt ladies! I like the site and will return to it. |
|
05-11-22 04:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Hot Guys Fuck
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The brother/sister(?) site of Bi Guys Fuck. Will need more description to describe the site.
Attractive males and female models. Mostly one on one action.
Large site, but most of the scenes have two videos, one is a behind the scenes. It makes the site seem bigger than it is.
I thought about listing this as the #1 pro. If you join with a gift card it’s cheaper. I used a $17 gift card and received 25 days, that’s 68 cents per day. They offer two paid memberships that are $30 and $40 for 30 days or $1 or $1.33 per day.
Gay men should check this out as well as bisexual men. And maybe women, even though it’s listed as for women porn. |
| Cons: |
The site is glitchy. I clicked join and it took me to the “secret menu”. I clicked join again and it took me to advertisement for their penis pills. I finally got to a join page and joined with a gift card. I don’t trust a site with this many issues.
Don’t stone me for this, but this site is no more directed at women than any other porn site. These seem to be gay and bisexual men. Calling these guys “hot” makes me think it’s aimed at gay men. Most of these guys are not masculine or big, muscular guys. These men are more in the “twink” category. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this after enjoying Bi Guys Fuck last month. Some of the first scenes on Bi Guys Fuck are from Hot Guys Fuck. They have the watermark. That is easily the feeling I get from these scenes. One of the things this site advertises is the men get as much camera time as the women. I don’t know what porn they have been watching, but that’s fairly common unless it’s POV. I will even say the men get too much camera time on this site. Maybe during the cumshot or the moment of penetration. Those are views women like to see. Showing the guy’s face midway through the scene isn’t doing anything for me. I have watched a lot of solo female porn. I don’t even like when the camera focuses on the woman’s face during the scene. I’m paying for porn not headshots.
This is very much a gay/bisexual male site. The sex is as good and believable as most porn sites. You know from watching the scenes that these men are medicated. Every scene has an advertisement for their penis pills. You do get to see very erect men and large cumshots, but when the men are presented as the “eye candy” it kind of removes the interest. I’m not into “pretty” guys. Gay men are. It may say “for women”, but it’s not for me. I’m a traditional woman. I’m nearing 40 and I have known a lot of gay men and watched a lot of gay porn. I wonder if Bi Guys Fuck maybe hurts my view of Hot Guys Fuck. On Bi Guys Fuck it’s normal for the scene to be split into multiple downloads. One of the downloads will be the guys together while the woman watches and masturbates. The other will be one or both guys taking turns with the woman. That is what these scenes remind me of.
There is padding in the site size. There are 2-3 updates per week. One is a behind the scenes video. Maybe those would be more interesting, except, those are 2-3 minutes long. They get 1-2 questions. Those are released as a new update. It’s only updating with a new sex scene every 7-8 days. That’s still not bad. I’m going to say something that I felt while watching multiple scenes from this site. A lot of the guys are prettier than the women and the guys are not that pretty. There are some pretty women on this site, but there is reality in if you put a less physically attractive person with another person, there’s a chance the other person will look more attractive than they really are. I see that in some of these scenes. I do believe everyone on the site is attractive. That would be a 5-6 on a 10 scale. Only a few of the women even reach an 8. They do have those women in more scenes than one.
The videos, from what I am seeing, do not have 4K. Bi Guys Fuck also didn’t have 4K. I don’t have a problem with that. They do have 1080p, 720p and 480p. There are several parts to this site that are going to make most people feel like there’s a hollowness to the site and content. Besides the constant advertising of their penis pills. They also have a “secret menu”. Members are the only people that can see it. It’s just the same thing as the regular scenes. They hype the “someone returns!” Why even do that? It’s gimmicky-feeling. Would I be wrong in saying young gay men are really into surprises and the dramatic return of a favorite? I say that knowing my best friend is a gay man. He has been my friend for 28 years. I know when he was younger, he was very dramatic and he loved surprises. It’s an eh for me.
Even with what I’m going to call a negative sounding review, the site is good, the sex scenes are good. But when half the scenes are useless behind the scenes videos. Every scene has an advertisement to start it about penis pills. I have to go to the secret menu to find more behind the scenes videos. I don’t care about HIS personality or his hobbies. How much longer will women be subjected to these stupid stereotypes? That doesn’t hurt the site that much for me, but I believe for a more obsessive person, it could be really annoying. If they dropped the ads, removed the secret menu and put the behind the scenes videos in their own section, it would be a near 95 site. Instead, there are nearly 800 scenes and what you find out is they didn’t do these behind the scenes videos in their earlier days. What they have done consistently is make sure to show the guy’s butthole. I will also mention the scenes that are two guys with a female, the guys can’t quit looking at each other, their smiles, their dicks, their buttholes. I am going to give it an 85 with major reservations. They have a good site that could be great. |
|
03-08-22 05:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Girlsway
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s a lesbian-themed network of five themed sites or series or niches. These niches and sub-niches and genres and sub-genres are starting to become confusing.
As a network it has 2,062 scenes with downloads and downloadable pictures.
The famous and highly-respected Bree Mills produces at least some of this content. I will have some comments on that.
The videos have a lot going for them with up to 4K on the newer ones and most of the scenes have a story.
There are subtitles available for the scenes with female models that do not speak English. I think the scenes that are not English are okay for me, to just stream. It’s hard to watch a porn scene while reading what is being said.
A lot of normal niches are explored on this network: Older/younger being a major one. |
| Cons: |
I just think some of the scenes try too hard to not be porn. That is a downside of having Bree Mills. There are expectations.
It doesn’t matter how good the story is if the models cannot convey the feelings and emotions needed for the story. |
| Bottom Line: |
Who to blame? The producer/writer or porn? That is the only big negative I took from these scenes. I don’t know if porn itself causes the writer to have to limit their stories, which would also include the models’ acting ability. The scenes that I just didn’t get into had a common feeling of the story either tried too much or didn’t even try. That’s probably unfair to judge by. It is a very good network if you like lesbian porn. The stories vary when it comes to quality. From the obvious ones like two friends going to Yoga class, in a woman’s house. Maybe porn does limit that?
The models are all pretty or at least above average. I do believe any blame should be placed on porn. You get scenes that are inconsistent. Some of the stories are ones I watched videos of ten years ago with the same story. That must be it. There is a time period that once passed clears the memory of that story. That is, I believe, the limitation of porn. The scenes that they seem to put the most marketing into are the best ones. I really liked the “Schooled” scene with Brooklyn Gray, Sheena Ryder and Serena Siren, that’s a tongue twister, which is fittingly, on a lesbian site.
The first thing I will point out that I like are the scenes with more than 2 women. They have a lot of 3 or more women scenes. They also have a lot of older women with younger women scenes. I believe that is probably the most realistic fantasy a straight woman has about lesbian sex. I believe we all had that one teacher that was really pretty and was very nice to us. That is a tough part of making lesbian porn. It had to appeal to either straight men or straight women. I do see the majority of the scenes as aimed at men. I was impressed by Casey Calvert. She has a scene called, “Grand Opening” which needed to be a lesbian scene with that name. It has 3 other models in it. It follows the script of the older woman is teaching the younger ones to have lesbian sex.
The network doesn’t specifically call itself a network, but it does have 5 different niches/series. I believe they even limit themselves with trying to follow a set theme. The network has over 2,000 scenes and it is updating at least 10 times per month. There is good value. There is not an avoidance of those repeated stories. I have seen so many porn scenes, lesbian and straight, with the paying off the debt story.
You do get pictures and those are downloadable. Those do look like stills from the videos. A scene that I thought looked really good before watching it, to find it, it wasn’t that good is Every Woman’s Born Different. It has everything going for it except the models don’t seem to be that much into it. I wasn’t familiar with any of the three models in it and it showed. I don’t know a lot of models, but the scene felt like one experienced model with two models shooting their first scene. I did find a humorous discussion about the scenes. The older woman is supposed to be the stepmother to both of the younger female models. Someone asked the question of how that is possible. That would require one of the daughters to be the mom’s real daughter. I didn’t even pick up on that until I read the comments, but that goes into what I’m talking about with the stories. Trying so hard to make the stepfamily niche, then losing all believability in the process, even though the scene is very serious about itself.
The majority of scenes are very good. You just can’t tell based on who is in the scene. You have to jump from one scene to another trying to find one that doesn’t have an overbearing story that the models clearly cannot act out. I’m still going to score it good, but I don’t know if I’m just seeing reality that porn is better as a fantasy. |
|
03-08-22 05:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
BJ Raw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I was first introduced to by Adult Time. It is “raw” blowjobs.
Not a big site but does have 62 scenes and most are long considering the niche is limited. It updates once per week.
If you like women rimming men this site has that in nearly, if not every, scene.
Video download quality is up to 4K with multiple options.
Pretty models, that is one part that surprised me for this niche.
The guys are well above average endowment and the women put every inch to full use. |
| Cons: |
I have joined a few blowjob-focused sites in the past and keep thinking there will be more than just regular suck, to and from head movements and there is, it’s rimming. Which I am not into. They could easily add a different variation in some of the scenes.
Anything I say is going to come off as “being too critical”. Are there not enough scenes of sucking, to and from movements and rimming? There’s more that leads me to try sites like this one. Maybe they don’t realize this is going to become repetitive? |
| Bottom Line: |
I admittedly get frustrated with sites like this one. The video quality is very good. Besides 4K, they have 1080p and 360p. They also have downloadable photo zips that are pretty good. Those resolution options may not even please some people. The newer scenes replaced one of the two versions of 1080p with 4K. The oldest scenes have 1080p in two bitrates, then falls all the way to 360p. Am I thinking too much? They have the 720p for streaming. I don’t see the point of having 360p if you’re not going to have 720p. It says mobile, but my cellphone is 1080p.
The frustration is more about the content. These scenes are about several things. One, to show how pretty the woman’s face is. It’s very close to a POV-style video. The second part is to show what the woman will do besides blowjob. There’s ball sucking, ball licking and probably deepest rimming I have seen. The models’ pretty face isn’t near as pretty with two balls on her forehead and a mound of body hair wrapping around her face. That’s mostly what you will see during that part. She then switches to blowjob and shows how far she can go before gagging. The women are good at blowjobs. The biggest compliment I can pay the man or men, is that there’s a constant erection and it’s above average.
The scenes are longer than I am used to in this niche. Some are around 30 minutes even. That’s a long time to watch a woman bury her face and stretch her throat. I have been told many times in my profession, not to complain, unless I have a solution. It’s pretty easy on this site. Does no one in porn use edging the dick? Does no one use vibrators on the frenulum of the dick? Add some teasing, do something different. You could tell me the name of the site is BJ Raw, I should expect blowjobs. There’s as much rimming and playing with the balls as blowjobs. I like this niche. I would like to see it try and advance a little. I won’t name the Blowjob site, I first encountered with this niche, but it has 20 times the scenes this site has and has the woman doing as much as these women do. This site looks like it’s trying to be a niche site that draws people from a certain fetish into it. They’re not doing anything that different than any other full hardcore site. I do believe they could change that.
There are only around 60 scenes, but it is updating weekly, and the models are generally very pretty. The settings are better than you get in normal porn scenes. It moves around throughout the scene. The setting can even start outside then move indoors. It feels like they are going in the right direction, but they turn back around and just do what is expected. If anything about porn has worn on me, it is the feeling that I am watching the producer’s fantasy. That’s fine if I am, but I shouldn’t be paying for someone else’s fantasy. Switch it up a little. I would recommend watching it on Adult Time. I did take the upgrade offer to it. I have a year subscription to Adult Time. They seem to send me these partner offers about once or twice a month. I should have looked more into the actual BJ Raw site before agreeing to join it. I had one of those turn out to be a very good separate site.
This one is not bad. It is repetitive. One of my most watched niches is this one. I like seeing the nude man. It just doesn’t do enough to make me see the word “raw”. I thought each scene would have some variation. I don’t know how men feel about this part. I noticed it in a lot of these scenes. The female twerking. I’m as tired of that as seeing the same 3 actions happening in blowjobs. I’m giving it what I would call a slightly below average score. There is a lot more they could be doing with nearly 30 minutes per video. Maybe someone will get a laugh out of this. I felt like pushing the woman’s head back while she was doing the rimming and saying, “I think it’s clean enough!” Spit, polish and shine. |
|
03-08-22 05:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Every angle of massage porn is covered on the 7 “channels” or “sites” in this network.
Currently has 2,265 scenes across the network and updates 6-7 times per month.
Scenes are longer than average and it’s because of the massage part.
Based on the tags just about everything is covered from ball licking to pussy licking.
Last few years downloadable videos have 4K.
Pretty models, but the uniforms are kind of annoying for me. |
| Cons: |
Either have to pay extra, luck into a promo or join for a year to get downloads.
Some of the sites are not updating. It is only a problem based on the sites representing different niches in the massage genre. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start with a listing of the 7 different sites/channels with the scene number in parenthesis: Nuru Massage (674), All Girl Massage (638), Massage Parlor (314), Soapy Massage (241), Fantasy Massage (183), Milking Table (112) and Tricky Spa (103). These are the ones still updating: All Girl Massage and Nuru Massage. That does cause a problem with the niches and video download quality. Three of the sites have not been updated since 2019: Tricky Spa, Soapy Massage, Milking Table and Massage Parlor. Those each represented different niches and none of those have 4K scenes.
Though it is not listed as one of the sites/channels, they do have Family Sex Massage as well. It also isn’t updating and is grouped into the Fantasy Massage site. It does seem like they were trying to do too many different niches and just started giving up on all of them. There is good news on the download quality, other than the oldest scenes, most have at least 720p and 1080p. The bad news for me is the oldest scenes are from Soapy Massage and I really like that one. Some of those only have 480p as the highest download option.
The update schedule is good with 6-7 updates per month, but we run into a new conundrum. Since Nuru and All Girl Massage are the only sites updating, Nuru chooses to start the females in a uniform (hospital-type scrubs) and it looks like the same room and location. What probably wouldn’t be that noticeable, becomes noticeable since every other update is from Nuru Message. It’s one of the things I noticed. Soapy Massage is more of a handjob-type site and that niche is a favorite of mine. But it hasn’t updated in many years. They should try something new that brings in the niches they are no longer producing any scenes of. I don’t think they realized or cared to notice they eliminated their own variance. It makes the newer scenes seem repetitive.
The models are pretty. The male models, this made me laugh a little. The first hardcore porn I remember seeing had Evan Stone in it. He is in one of the scenes that was just released 3 months ago. He is nearing 60. It is one of the examples of them trying some story. It seems Evan is Gia Derza’s landlord. It is a very good scene once I got over the shock of seeing a man that I remember seeing in a porn scene from 2002. There’s not a lot of story in the scenes. I do think that hurts this genre. Is everyone just signing up for massages? At least that one, had Evan coming to collect the rent, it turned Gia giving him a massage. That is also the problem with the uniforms.
The site or network is better than I may be making it sound. One thing I really like about these scenes is there are different types of cumshots. There are facials, swallowing and on the body. That is maybe a female thing. I like seeing the different types of cumming and don’t dislike any. I do like that they do the different types. As I scan through putting the final touches on this review, I can’t help but notice there are even scenes on All Girl Massage with the uniform on one of the females. I get that they are going for authentic, but when the scenes don’t do much to stand out from the pack, then you add the same uniforms, it does become repetitive. My score shows that I do like it. They just need to add more depth. I do like the use of the massage oils. It makes the sex look messier. One of the tags caught my attention. I don’t think I have seen it before. That is Body Sliding with 561 scenes featuring body sliding. Also in the tags, is one that I think is worth pointing out, only 1,594 of the 2,265 scenes have the “Massage” tag. I think they have a non-porn definition of massage. I haven’t seen a scene on here without massaging of some kind. |
|
03-08-22 05:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I wish I tried before I did (3 weeks ago). Softcore, glamour, realistic masturbation and the models are gorgeous and various adjectives based on their personality (cute, sexy, seductive, pretty, etc).
The videos have 4K on the newer videos and there are multiple download resolutions available.
The pictures will turn you into a picture fan. Besides the large amount and an obvious preference towards releasing picture sets (around 4 times as many photo sets as videos), the resolution of the pictures is the highest I have seen.
The models are so diverse on this site. The different races, ethnic groups, the personalities, it’s my experience that sites like this have slender, white models (like me). On this site, the models present a mix of everything.
I liked the small preview I saw on other sites enough that I just joined the year membership. It helps that there are nearly daily updates and so much back catalog to go through.
My new favorite site of all genres. |
| Cons: |
Someone please fix the neverending scrolling page or at least offer a desktop version of the site. I lose my place when going through the older scenes. Before I can get back to where I was at, I see another model I want to check out, then forget where I was at.
This is a good con to have. The pictures are so big, I can tell you if the models shave their pubic hair or wax. It could be a con for some people. These pictures give a very personal, up close and personal view of these models in full nudity. |
| Bottom Line: |
I considered this site at least 10 times. I kept getting it confused with one of the similar sites. I also had been trying to evolve my porn interests beyond softcore. That experiment is only going okay. Seeing the more graphic porn had pushed me away a little from the softcore sites I first joined like Nubiles. Forget bisexuality, porn has bipolarity. The models are either teasing too much or they’re taking way too much. The middle ground seems to be clouded with boring sex that looks like sex I had the last time I had sex. They’re getting paid to go through the motions?
I guess I signed up for their emails. I received a year offer back around New Years. It was what I viewed as a very good price. I looked up some previews and decided to give it a year membership try. I meant to join it 2-3 years ago. I’m making up for lost time with the year membership. My first impression was a little negative. I do not like the constant scrolling sites. They do offer tabs that help. There are tabs for Models, Galleries, Films and Stories. As an erotica author in my spare time. I thought the stories would be erotica stories. Those look more like extra pictures, more personal pictures. One shows pictures of a model eating and she has her bra half off. It shows more of the models’ personality.
The tabs allowed me to focus more on the content. The constant scrolling is still there, but it’s not as bad when you can split everything up. I have tried counting the photo sets and videos. The scrolling page just is not very friendly to counting. I do know they have updated around 6 times per week since early January. There’s close to 3,000 photo sets. The videos are closer to 600. The videos try not to be a focus, similar to Met Art, but the videos are really good – unlike Met Art. Everything about this site impresses me except that scrolling part. The blend of races and ethnicity. There are pale, redheaded gingers like me. There are darker toned exotic looking women from Asia and maybe South America. I want to say, this is the porn I was looking for 3 years ago! I think it’s one of the few sites I knew about but hadn’t joined.
The photos are varied in setting. That is what I am basing my thoughts on of where these models are from. There are lush, almost jungle-looking areas. I don’t think you need the videos with this porn. The models are very capable of expressing their feelings and emotions in the pictures. I believe that is something we lose in videos. That’s when they have to act. You don’t even see that on the videos from this site. The videos are very natural. The models look like maybe being fully nude and spreading in photos wasn’t quite enough for them. They want to see how they look on video, in action, using those bodyparts. The videos have at least some touching up to orgasmic masturbation. I don’t know the logic behind it. I could maybe think about the mental side of it. This is what these scenes remind me of: The models look like someone said to them, “Be yourself, you’re very pretty, you have a great body, express that to my camera.” And they do. There is no feeling of “you have to take 16 dicks in the next 13 minutes, oh yeah, look sexy if you can.” Try this site out and see if you don’t notice the difference. There is a more personal feeling to the content. Like the model is making love to the camera. I’m not really old enough, maybe I should say, I didn’t have access to porn during the pre-internet days. Maybe I missed the memo that said porn should be sexy and it should show how horny women are.
That answers all the world’s problems! We need these young, gorgeous women to show how horny they are. We probably wouldn’t have near as many of the gender problems we have.
The site is easily my new favorite. I am sure it could become repetitive, thanks mostly to that scrolling problem. I don’t believe the content will be repetitive. We are seeing a different personality from each model on this site. I hated the old interviews on porn sites. They all had the same questions, “What age did you lose your virginity?” Ask her what she likes to do to attract a man or woman. This site and this content show the young woman answering that question. Best site I have ever been a member of. I am looking into the lifetime deal. I don’t even need to say it’s recommended. |
|
02-09-22 07:04am
Replies (1)
|
Review
48
|
Taboo Heat
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A standalone site that has a large selection of their content on Adult Time. This review is of the standalone site and will note the number of scenes can be viewed/downloaded with an Adult Time account.
It is nice to know so many porn stars are related by marriage.
The scenes are fun. The actors and actresses in these scenes seem to have a lot of experience playing these roles. I even think a lot of what is fun, is just tongue-in-cheek humor from the actors and actresses. It looks like they are trying to make each other laugh. That was bound to happen in this niche.
The standalone version has 178 scenes. I don’t know about this update schedule. Based on their dates, it has updated 14 times in January, today is the 23rd. On Adult Time, you can view and download 68 of the scenes. I joined it because I liked the 68 scenes on Adult Time.
Very long, story-themed |
| Cons: |
It has been done to death. I do think that two sites excel at the niche, this one and Family Strokes. That could push people away.
The not perfect female models in some of the scenes. There are some chubby women in this as stepmoms. I see it as a positive. If you’re just watching porn for the looks and visual arousal, this may not be the best site for you, especially considering the long scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I watched a faux stepfamily porn scene, I wasn’t for sure how I felt about it. I don’t have a stepfamily. That does put the burden on the story, the dialogue, the explanations, the actor and actresses being believable in their roles. I mean no offense to the porn industry or models. That is really asking more than a lot of porn models (male and female) are capable of doing. She can deepthroat an 11 inch dick. She doesn’t need to be able to act. Or she has the perfect body, who cares if she can make me believe that is her stepbrother? That’s a part of porn niches I believe is vastly overlooked. I was watching the scenes on Adult Time and it had a special promo to join Taboo Heat’s standalone site. I have had mostly good experiences with standalone sites produced by major sites. One of my favorites, as mentioned above, Family Stokes, is from Team Skeet. Know that in advance. If you are seeing the Taboo Heat scenes on Adult Time, you are not even seeing half of the scenes Taboo Heat has. If you like those on Adult Time, it’s a definite upgrade that you will want to take. This is very creative and fun porn.
This is also a good break from typical porn. The variations of models. I would like to see more races. I think in stepfamily, real-life situations, you have more interracial. You do get stepmoms that looks like they could be stepmoms. One that I was really impressed with is Cory Chase. She seems to be everybody’s stepmom! She is pretty, she looks to be early 40s and in excellent shape. I would think that’s a common age range for a stepmother of young adults. This site does that better than any of the stepfamily sites I have seen. There is enough believable age difference (in appearance, maybe not in real life), to make me believe these stepmoms are that horny.
On the standalone site, you have access to 178 scenes. I’m going to take an educated guess when I say this. If you like Cory Chase, you will love this site. It almost seems like this is or was her own site. She is in 169 of the scenes. The pro I listed as humor was based on that. She’s everybody’s stepmom. That makes all the others everyone’s stepsibling. I have joined some sites later (thanks to Christmas deals), that made me feel like the sites take themselves way too seriously. This site doesn’t. It reminds me of one of those B-level reality shows. You can’t help but keep watching it. You can get a taste of it on Adult Time. I will say again if you like the Adult Time scenes from this site it should be no question that you’re going to join this standalone site. I joined it without knowing if it had that many more scenes. It has 110 more. That was definitely worth to me. There are cute, younger stepdaughters. Mostly cute, younger stepsons. The update schedule hasn’t been manipulated. It looks like they are releasing a scene every other day on average. I don’t know if they maybe had a vault of the scenes stored up and ready to go. At their current pace they will have over 240 new scenes just this year.
All of the 178 scenes have the full complement of download options from 160p to 4K and there are a total of 8 download resolutions. I find the 720 or 1080 are best for me. These scenes are long. The photos are not going to compete with the studios known for photos. Most only have 15-30 photos in them.
I think the model list on the standalone site gives an idea that you better like Cory Chase. There are only 26 females in the 178 scenes. There are a few other “stepmoms” that I kind of think they need to work in some more. I don’t know if there’s a risk of overexposure of Cory Chase. You are going to question how she has this many stepchildren. The stories, the dialogue is very good. Cory probably should be a mainstream actress. Which is why I am guessing they use her in so many scenes on this site.
Very little to complain about unless you just have trouble believing one woman has this many stepchildren. Considering how good her performances are, she may convince me of how she ended up with so many stepchildren. There is the ending question of does a site like this help or hurt Adult Time? It’s obviously their site. Would they benefit more by having it in full on Adult Time? Probably not in the short-term. Maybe that is why there are so many updates. I do believe Adult Time is risking cannibalizing itself. I did get it on a Christmas special as an add-on. It would still be worth the full price if you like the content. I just don’t know about long-term. Really good site, probably the best, if you are into the stepfamily porn niche and like Cory Chase. If you like all those there is no reason for you to hesitate in joining it. |
|
02-09-22 07:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Bi Guys Fuck
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very good bisexual men site; maybe the best I have seen.
It’s a big site for the niche. It has 214 scenes. It updates with sex scenes 4-6 times per month. They also have some behind the scenes – scenes. Those are a complete waste for me.
Very attractive male and female models. I think that is the big difference I see in this site than I see in most bisexual male sites.
Videos are downloadable. There are pictures, but it looks like to me you have to download one picture at a time. I don’t see a zip option. Those are just screenshots. Everything is up to 1080p.
My personal favorite part of bisexual male sites is a big part of this site. I will have to explain that. It has to do with the pairings and how the scenes play out. I will start the bottom line with that.
Easy site to use. I used a gift card and received 23 days of membership. The pricing on this site is fairly expensive. Everybody gets a gift card they have no use for. I had one |
| Cons: |
The oldest scenes are not even from this site. Those scenes are from Hot Guys Fuck. Some of those are not bisexual. Some are a man with woman, some are a man with man, no threesomes in those oldest scenes. It’s a small amount.
The price shows as $29.95. It also shows as $39.95. I felt much safer using a gift card.
I think they own a penis pill company and maybe even their own lube line. You get ads for those, and the scenes even include the products. Am I watching porn or an infomercial? |
| Bottom Line: |
The pro I talked about being my favorite part of a bisexual male site is some of these sites try to do too much. My favorite part is when the two guys are doing things to each other while the female watches and masturbates. It can be the other way, too. One of the men doing things with the female. The other man watching and masturbating. You can show all that in a camera view without needing any tricks. This site does that better than any of this niche that I have been a member of. That’s a major pro and a big part of my score. I know that even straight orgy or group sex scenes have the problems of showing everything that’s going on, too.
I believe the attractiveness of these models is rare in this niche. A lot of these bisexual men sites have an older, not as attractive female with the two guys that looked like they showed up for a gay scene. Someone decided to add the older, unattractive woman. This is the only niche I know of that has that problem. On this site, the men are masculine, athletic, handsome, nice bodies. The females look like models you would see on any mainstream porn site. I watch these scenes and feel like I’m really watching 2 men and a female doing something they always wanted to try. There is an excitement. An enjoyment even that you don’t usually see in bisexual men porn. That is why the first paragraph explained one masturbates while the other two have sex. I do not like when they try to get too complicated. Having one of the guys having sex with the woman while the other guy is trying to have sex with the man, all at the same time. They do a very good job of making the three people seem into each other. Not just into the person they are directly with. You would have to watch various bisexual male scenes to see what I’m describing.
I really don’t know what to say about the pricing. It started at $29.95 and that was coming from a promo for $9.95. I was going to join it either way. I clicked to input my payment and it went up to $39.95. I backed back out to the gift card section. The trade-in price was equal to $29.95. I had a $25 gift card. They gave me 23 days. I thought this site was owned by the people that own Adult Time. That is where I first saw the scenes from the site. Adult Time has maybe a dozen of these scenes. I really liked those. That’s what led me to join. Be aware of the pricing. If you have an aunt that insists on buying you a gift card for the holidays from a store that you don’t have a location with 1,500 miles, there is the easy way to join this site.
The scene numbers are not misleading. From my count, it looks like 8 Behind the Scenes videos and those were all released over the last few months. I will explain why I don’t like those. This niche is not one you hear about a lot in real life. I know it happens. It’s just not something that’s common. I need the certain level of fantasy involved in watching the scenes. Those Behind the Scenes videos remove that fantasy. I will even defend the site; they are not using those to replace updates. The updates are still the same as the months that they didn’t have Behind the Scenes videos.
The sex is very good. It’s not for everyone. I do believe this is the niche for aiming at women. I don’t know how I would feel about being in a M/M/F scene, but for watching, it’s a lot better for me than watching gay male porn. Adding the female is the major difference. At times, some of the scenes disappoint me. The newest current scene is one of those. The female has minimal sex in it. She does a little. It’s more her watching and even directing the guys. I hope they’re going in that direction. That’s just going to turn these scenes into gay male porn. Overall, they do a good job of mixing the action up between the genders. This most recent scene, the female is really pretty. I need to be convinced these two guys are into women. She would be the type that I have trouble believing real bisexual men wouldn’t be into. The download options are basic, but very good. You can download 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p on all the scenes. There’s more to like than to dislike. I downloaded nearly all the scenes. It’s a site you should look into if you have any interest at all in bisexual male porn. I’m going to say it’s the best I have seen of bisexual men. |
|
02-09-22 06:58am
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As a huge fan of story-driven porn, I have chosen to pass up on this site before now. The dark, gritty, nature of the scenes are both a pro and con.
The artistic value of these scenes is quite high, but once you go into artistic, you really need to live up to the “title” of the painting, unless you’re going for abstract.
There are 378 scenes. The updates are spaced out, but very consistent. You should expect 5-6 updates per month.
As much as I want to applaud the writing and storytelling in the scenes, this reminds me a lot of older porn plots that I have seen from studios like Vivid. It could be those scenes are so far in the past, now, that a younger generation hasn’t experienced those plots. It is good storytelling for porn.
All video downloads have at least 1080p, with the majority having 4K.
The scenes are long, the quality is high, there’s a story, very attractive models. |
| Cons: |
My number one con is an easy one. A lot of these plots are not even new in porn. The earliest porn I watched had some of these plots. Especially the ones that’s go into religion. There’s stepfamily porn on here. I can’t be as positive about that part of the site as others have been. Now, I have to look at the precursor Pretty Dirty to see if changes were made.
This will be a con I don’t think I have seen in a porn review. Poor casting. If you’re going to have a scene about a psychiatrist, at least make sure the person playing the psychiatrist is not a very well-known porn star |
| Bottom Line: |
This was only my second time joining Adult Time. The first time I was just so overwhelmed with it that I didn’t see a lot of what the network had. I joined the year offer last month. I do find a lot of interest in written erotica. My thoughts before the last few weeks, about Pure Taboo, was that I would either love it or hate it. I don’t hate it. I don’t love it either. They can have all the credit for making a dark, gritty, atmosphere, excellent lighting for the scenes, to set the tone. This site is a good example for why most porn companies don’t try to be this story-driven. If you’re going to have humans playing out the story, they are going to need to be very good actors and actresses. A lot of the actors and actresses in these scenes are well-known. I recognize at least 75% of the names. That is why I didn’t review this site the time I was on it before. I felt like I would be too critical of the site that’s trying to at least give us a story.
There are 378 scenes. The update schedule can be a little confusing. There is 5-7 day gap between some scenes, then they will release two scenes in four days. It works out, currently, to 5-6 scenes per month. I have to say my taste in porn must not be too bad. The best scene I have watched so far is Clinical Trial featuring Danny Mountain and Kira Noir. It just so happened to be nominated for a 2020 best AVN scene. That scene, at its roots, is just another doctor takes advantage of female patient scene which we have seen for years in porn. But it is told in the story of the scene, she is an athlete and I know there were some abuse stories that came out about a sports doctor abusing the young athletes. I think they are leaning on that being the taboo. They are using stories that are either known or are familiar to our brains.
I believe the mood, the lighting, the language, the roughness, adds to the taboo nature of the scenes. Because these are just niches, we have seen many times before in porn. Their production values are increasing the taboo-level. None of that is a really a complaint. I really enjoy story-driven porn. You end up in porn with one of two scenarios. You either get repetitive plot story-driven porn or you get no stories, repetitive porn. I will take the story side even it’s repetitive. I will give them credit for creating moods that makes the scenes feel more uncomfortable and tense. I have been looking at Pretty Dirty which is explained to be the precursor to Pure Taboo. I will review it separately. I see a lot of differences between the sites.
the easiest way to describe the scenes on the site is to say you’re going to be put into a scenario and plot meant to make you uncomfortable. That this should not be happening. I would give them a B+ for that. It really should be lower, maybe a C, but I am considering they must create stories their actors and actresses can act out believably. Just some of what I noticed as stories/taboos I have seen in the past. There is a scene called, “Blind Surprise” where there is a blind person in the scene. I don’t think she is blind. She is acting it. One of the very first porn movies I watched. It was before internet porn. Was about a blind man with a woman. He was questioning his sexuality since he could not see. I still remember this because I thought it was so wrong when I watched it. She fingered his butthole to see how he liked that. Then, she had sex with him to see if he liked that better. That scene had to be 1970s or maybe 80s. It was on a tape my dad had. I know as well as anyone that creative ideas are rarely new. On the other hand, if you come into this site expecting something very taboo, you’re not going to get it.
It's a very good site for what it is. It’s one of the sites that makes me glad I bought the year subscription. Hopefully, they keep on with what they are doing and improving it. The scenes are very long. There are not as many 4K videos on this site as there are on other Adult Time sites. I don’t know if time/filesize is a factor in that. All the newer scenes do have 4k. I think if you’re on this specific site for 4K, you may have missed the point. This is a weird recommendation. See it as the site that gives you reason to join Adult Time for a year. There’s a lot of potential on this site. |
|
02-09-22 06:55am
Replies (0)
|
|
