| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Poll
I picked, "yes, but only 2nd and 3rd prize". That is the way the raffle used to be and I don't remember any problems coming from it. I do remember when the raffle changed to a winner couldn't win the following week and that led to weeks where there weren't even enough eligible reviewers to win. I believe with the format being monthly now it would be taking a huge risk to say all 3 winners one month would be ineligible the next month.
|
03-10-21 01:51am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I used to not download anything so I picked $25. I would still join a site for $25 without downloads. I just don't like it when a site doesn't tell you there are no downloads until you get inside the member area.
|
04-28-20 09:13pm
|
Reply
3
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
|
04-28-20 09:11pm
|
Reply
4
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
|
04-27-20 11:20am
|
Reply
5
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
|
04-27-20 11:06am
|
Reply
6
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm naive?
What do you call the models that based on what you've said here chose to do a scene with a man known to abuse women in the scenes? Surely they would know it. And what do you call a man of your age that believes slapping and choking is some kind of terrible form of abuse? There are women that love being slapped and choked during sex.
What I can do is put you in contact with the agency I work for. We have entire days we work with abused women. I've been doing it for 10+ years. I've seen women with 2 inch deep rope burn scars around their necks that can't talk. Women with their skin melted by battery acid. Women with their legs broken behind their heads. I don't know what it is about this site that makes everyone a know-it-all. Maybe I am being naive about why you reply since that gets you more tickets in the raffle? Stick to the political nonsense. You know nothing about abused women.
|
04-26-20 07:46am
|
Reply
7
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Being helpful is one thing. You started it with a correction of something I can reword to say "content that dates back 19 years". That would have been helpful to suggest. Instead, you stick to the technicality that the site itself is only 2 years old. Do you think to a person considering the site they care more about some of the content being 19 years old or the site only being 2?
You then replied with a LOL like a 12 year old. That's really helpful and not mocking is it? I'll edit it and reword it to say the content on the site is as old as 19 years. And there is an elitism here. See pointing out a technicality that has nothing to do with the actual content. That's a need for correcting people.
|
12-09-19 06:39am
|
Reply
8
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I see it that some of the content in the member's area is 19 years old. That makes the site 19 years old to me. The snobbery and elitism here is disgusting.
|
12-09-19 05:27am
|
Reply
9
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Going directly to the site shows no dates, but the first one posted is Redhead in the Forest. I want to say that might be newer. The same male and female have a re-creation of Lil' Red Riding Hood where the guy is dressed up like the big, bad wolf. That scene was released as a "bonus" scene recently. The Redhead in the Forest looks like after they took their costumes off. The next listed one is Kendra Fucked at a Sex Party, which doesn't look like outside, they are on a bed. The one before it was Jesse Storm Fucked on the Patio and the one before it was Highway to Fuck.
|
10-29-19 03:32pm
|
Reply
10
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
Your reply is one of the points I was making. I think porn directors are missing out on an entire audience. I know at least a couple of men that enjoy masturbating for women. I know it would be popular with straight women. I think gay men would like it from the voyeuristic side of watching a straight man masturbate for a straight woman. Porn tries so hard to make everything blatantly obvious and I think it is where porn is starting to fail. If it's supposed to be for gay enjoyment no one else is going to enjoy it that much. The same with straight sex. A gay man would need a lot of imagination to watch a man and woman have vaginal intercourse and see himself as the woman but a gay man could fantasize being the woman watching the straight man masturbate. I always thought straight men would have trouble with lesbian porn. There are no penises so what role do they see themselves in? Porn has to figure out that the world and sexuality has changed a lot over the last 10-15 years. Porn hasn't changed a lot.
|
07-10-19 08:51pm
|
Reply
11
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I just noticed a lot of typos in my previous reply, but the site says I can no longer edit it.
|
07-02-19 10:04pm
|
Reply
12
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Maybe I am a little ahead of myself. My reply to LKLK linked to a site named Straight Guys! There are numerous reports coming out about women's use of porn. The percentages are still favoring the men 70% to 30%, however, women spend more time watching porn per day than men do. As money hungry as the porn industry is it seems like they would be trying to get in on the new audience. The sites I have seen for women are like the lovecore sites for men. It could be my own past of being a sexual recluse, but I do not know any woman that fantasizes about having regular sex. I don't like to discuss patients, but I can vaguely make a blanket statement that the regular sex is a big part of marital problems that I hear about. I don't know when it became more normal for women to masturbate for their boyfriend or husband, but I do think there is an obvious connection to porn. Maybe the boyfriend or husband likes watching women masturbate in porn? The wife or girlfriend wants him to be as into her and the woman in the porn.
I look at it that way. If porn makes it more normal for men to masturbate in front of women there would be something new for couples to improve their sex life with. I also think where using gay or even just smaller, thinner men, it does not strike the female's sexual instincts. Some (one on here on PU) high level psychologists believe we have created fantasies that only make us happy inside. That would not trigger as must lust as a fantasy should. Women, in my experience, have way more sexual triggers than men do. It just seems there is a large amount of content just waiting to be made. I do know some men are more aroused by watching their girlfriend or wife watching porn that turns her on more than watching porn aimed at the man. If only I had the money to start such a network! I will check the thread out.
|
07-02-19 07:38pm
|
Reply
13
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
No one really knows how limited the appeal is. The estimations have 30% of porn viewers being women. The two most searched porn sites by women are "Lesbians" and "Gay Porn". There is not a category in porn for "Straight men solo" or "Men masturbating for women". If females made up a smaller group than 30% it would make sense not to try it, but considering there are sites focused on women using enemas, I do not believe that has the market potential of "straight men solo".
Like in the comparison you started with. Is it normal, in real life, for women to go up and masturbate in front of men? There are over 2,000 sites with women masturbating in full scenes on them. Even if the solo men category was based on percentages, that would mean there should be at least 500 solo men sites. I'm not one of the women that hates all porn or thinks the porn industry is unfair. I just believe until someone takes a chance and gives porn aimed at straight women a chance there is an entire market being left untouched. I can't say this for sure, but I believe gay men would also enjoy seeing straight men masturbating.
|
07-02-19 07:18pm
|
Reply
14
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thank you, I used several PU veterans reviews as a guideline for my review, including yours.
|
06-10-19 11:13am
|
Reply
15
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
StrokeOff's Reply
I am glad you found my review helpful. I tried to focus on the parts I believe Nubiles.net does better at than the Nubiles Porn network. Most reviews I see of Nubiles are more focused on the network.
|
06-10-19 11:11am
|
Reply
16
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Shen's Reply
Thank you, I hope to have more reviews over the next few weeks.
|
06-10-19 11:07am
|
Reply
17
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thank you! I was surprised when I received the email with the gift card in it.
|
06-10-19 11:05am
|
Reply
18
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thank you, I have read a lot of reviews here and hope it shows. I do not like admitting it, but I can be closeminded in the genres I like. I am trying to expand my breadth of interest in porn. I enjoy all naked parts. I just do not like some of the actions once naked lol!
|
06-05-19 02:03am
|
