I picked, "yes, but only 2nd and 3rd prize". That is the way the raffle used to be and I don't remember any problems coming from it. I do remember when the raffle changed to a winner couldn't win the following week and that led to weeks where there weren't even enough eligible reviewers to win. I believe with the format being monthly now it would be taking a huge risk to say all 3 winners one month would be ineligible the next month.
I used to not download anything so I picked $25. I would still join a site for $25 without downloads. I just don't like it when a site doesn't tell you there are no downloads until you get inside the member area.
Production values are above average unless you consider story part of the production values.
There are 4K downloads over the last year and 1080p prior to those.
I have not seen a tattoo or a set of implants on the site.
917 scenes, but they haven't updated since January 2019.
Cons:
This type of porn is very dull and plain to me.
The scene titles make you believe there is a story going on, but if there is it is well-hidden.
Now that Adult Time has taken over there is no way to search just for models on 21 Natural. If you go to a model's page it shows you all of her content on all of the Adult Time sites.
Bottom Line:
This site reminds me of Sex Art. The models are very attractive. The settings are nice and fit the modern vibe of the content. That seems to be where they stopped.
Sites like these are hard to review and hard to be too critical of or too enthusiastic about. They do a good job of sticking to their naturals theme, but the scenes lack everything except sex. Maybe they were going for natural equals no stories -- just sex?
I'm not for sure how hard it is to find someone to write a little story with dialogue? The stories seem to be based on that is a man, that is a woman, they are horny, watch them have sex.
The quality of camerawork, lighting and person that opens the window to let natural wind in are all very high and consistent. The closest they come to a story are in the 21 Foot Art scenes.
They have 917 scenes, but their updates seemed to just stop for no reason. Between December 1st, 2018 and the first week of January 2019, they had 16 scenes, then those updates stopped.
You can download in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes of the last year have 4K or 2160p. The streaming video is 720p at least to my monitor that is what it looks like.
They have picture sets for download.
It feels like they are getting everything right except the content. The positions even look the same from scene to scene as is the order of the sexual positions. It is why I felt the foot scenes added to the content. It at least breaks the monotony of following a set order of positions.
For me, between this site, Sex Art and X-Art, I have realized porn is not supposed to be romantic. Scenes like these strengthen the theories about sex being lust. There is little feeling of lust in the scenes. I will try to avoid scenes like these from now on. That is a subjective opinion. If you already know you like this type of porn then you will probably like this site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
All the videos are available in 4K as well as High Definition
Comes with Adult Prime Network of over 75 studios
The network has no download limits
Nice variety of CFNM scenarios
The downloads were fast
The younger models, both male and female, were very attractive
Cons:
Only 34 videos are available
You never know when updates will be posted
Bottom Line:
I like Clothed Female with Naked Male as a porn theme as the men are there as the object of desire for women. I will check out any site like this, but unfortunately there just aren’t all that many.
The level of variety you do find here is surprisingly refreshing as well as diverse. I found older men with younger women, older women with younger men, outdoor as well as indoor scenes, two on one, even one with five women and one guy, mild bdsm, although one that I found impossible to watch was Ball Busting with Gunther, BBW women, and even a few where the guy was so old and ugly that it stretched my ability to believe it could be true. I can’t explain one in particular that got to me and was my favorite. I guess it was the contrast of two gorgeous young ladies being so enthusiastic with a guy like that.
The sex was for the most part the women blowing the guys, which is commonly what you see a lot of in CFNM. In a few scenes a second or third woman walks in and accidentally sees the action. Many of these scenes had a woman who was watching and masturbating to the action, who then later got in on it. I could see that happening in real life and would like more of that in all porn today, not just CFNM. It adds a touch of believability and is something that I think most women would find an improvement.
The tags for searching does give results over the whole network, not just this site. If you do a search under CFNM , you get some that are not here, giving a total of 58. If you want to search for more videos of the same female star you can, but the guys are not named. The downloads were fast and there were three options, one of course was 4K and another High Definition. The site did not have download limits as you might guess for only so few videos, but the network did not have any limits either.
The site Is rather small and it is hard to tell where its future is. It has been updated nine times so far this year, six in 2020, and 19 in 2019. I don’t have any serious negatives except that the site has only 34 videos. As much as this site was enjoyable, it was just not big enough by itself. The network though is huge with over 75 studios and there are several other older/younger sites if those appeal to you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with the Lets Doe it Network of sites
Irregular updates, but they are about one every two weeks.
Uses tags for easy searching
Four choices for video downloading. Full HD is the best
More than 200 scenes
Really gorgeous models made up to look their best
Great production values with a few small visual special effects such as fading in and out
Cons:
Limit of 100 downloads each month
Too many ads after you log in
Bottom Line:
I have never had a lesbian experience and don’t identify as one, but this site gave me reason to wonder. As a woman, I can enjoy watching orgasms, both male and female. I love men’s bodies, but women’s bodies have so many interesting parts, not just the one. What I saw on this site was just amazing. It may be the hottest girl/girl site I have ever been a member of.
The models are naturally beautiful without even trying. The site has them perfectly made up and they wear clothes that look great on them too. The women are a combination of classy and erotic. They do things like brush their hair, change outfits and have non erotic fun with each other as part of the prelude to the scene. They stare into each other’s eyes and turn each other on even before they touch one another. Presex erotic kissing is done well in every scene. These women are very feminine, unrushed, gentle and sensuous. For the most part, there is an attempt at a story, but not all that much. At least there is a logical progression into the sex, which is more than most porn has. The ages range from about 18 to 30, from naïve and exploring sexuality, to knowing exactly what each other would like. I believe that only another woman can know exactly how to please a woman to the max. Sometimes there is mutual masturbation, fingering, scissoring, the use of toys, strapons, and vibrators, but mostly there is a lot of slow erotic licking down there. The scenes easily shift from seductive to very explicit. These women are really into these scenes or they are better actresses than I think they are.
Some of the setups include roommates, step sisters and best friends. They know each other and then the action builds on that. What is missing though is that they don’t talk to each other. I am sure it is because they don’t speak English, or at least not well. They have subtitles in some scenes, but tone of voice and choice of words could have been very erotic. Sexy, playful talk turns us girls on. There are many outdoor sets and there are a few pool parties. There are also many indoor scenes in elegant places we could only dream about. The locations are an important part in making the scenes into a girl’s fantasy. I could easily imagine these women are on a once on a lifetime vacation. The camerawork, editing and general production values are some of the best I have ever seen on a porn site. I feel like I should be watching them in a movie theater. I can see watching these scenes with a partner or two and we would both get turned on together.
Mostly these are one on one scenes. Despite the range of ages, the pairings don’t play to that. There are a few solo masturbation scenes, but not many. There is a sprinkling of three ways and even a four way. As a site, it was easy to use and there are over 200 videos in the library. there is a download limit of 100 scenes per month, more than you can download them all in a monthly subscription. It also comes with a nice network, lets Doe It, but this is the only girl/girl site in it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Glamour porn, young women and men with more of a focus on videos.
Videos update once per week, picture sets were being released several times a month but after only 2 photo sets in July 2021, there have been none so far in August and it is the 10th of August.
Though it is just an opinion, I believe the hardcore scenes on this site, are better than the hardcore scenes on their sister siter Wow Girls.
Though the quality is not quite as high as Wow Girls (6K) videos, All Fine Girls does have 4K videos.
The site, like Wow Girls, is quite large. There are 2,400 videos and around 2,850 photo sets. All are downloadable.
The models are some of the prettiest I have seen with one exception, there isn’t a lot of ethnic diversity.
Cons:
The slower, current, picture set update rate is concerning.
The older videos only have a 480p download option.
Bottom Line:
You do get this site with Wow Girls, but I know there was a time when the sites were not included together. I have no reason to believe they will return to splitting the sites up, but it is interesting to look at the differences in the two sites. It does look like Wow Girls is considered the flagship site with it having higher video resolution options and more consistent updates. But All Fine Girls, in my opinion, is superior in the hardcore content. While Wow Girls excels at the solo scenes. Both sites are about equal on lesbian scenes.
The first difference you will notice is All Fine Girls does not have the 6K video option. That is not a problem for me. I can’t get my 4K monitor to work properly all the time and end up putting it on 1080p. All Fine Girls also doesn’t have as many scenes with the 30 or 60 frames per second option on the videos. The scenes do have a lower resolution than Wow Girls offers on their newest scenes. All Fine Girls has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K download options. To my surprise, the scenes on All Fine Girls are not any longer in length, and often are shorter than the Wow Girls scenes. That causes a real question in my brain. Are All Fine Girls more impressive hardcore scenes more impressive because the male and female are more into it? These are younger women and younger men. It’s possible the shorter scenes can’t be avoided if the males are getting aroused too fast.
The biggest disparity in the numbers I noticed is in the amount of hardcore scenes. All Fine Girls has over 900 hardcore scenes, while Wow Girls only has around 450 hardcore scenes. There are also some threesomes with males and females. It looks like All Fine Girls was likely the more hardcore version of Wow Girls at one point.
The photo sets could be disappointing just because they have nearly stopped releasing any new ones. The photo download options are 4000px, 2000px, 1000px and Original. The Original option here on All Fine Girls has photos that are 5800x3800 resolution. That is a concern if they are stopping or even slowing the release of these very good picture sets. I will mention one complaint about the photo downloads. The download links for each picture set it at the bottom of the page, you have to insta-scroll to the bottom to get through the 100-150 pictures before getting to the download links. I don’t understand why those links are not at the top of each picture set.
In my head, I believe I like All Fine Girls better than Wow Girls, but it’s not a real concern since you get both with one membership, but is worth mentioning. If All Fine Girls keeps slowing down the release of photo sets my opinion may change.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site gets lost in all the trendy MILF sites
Older women getting to act like younger women
The size of the site must be seen to be believed. There are nearly 8,000 videos and over 17,000 photosets
Newer videos have 4K downloads and most of the older videos have at least 720p or 1080p downloads
You can download the photosets in zips
Download speeds are good (80% my max)
Multiple daily updates.
Cons:
The site is so big it does become a con unless you can figure out a filter you like to use on searches
The sex videos (with men, lesbian) are not that good.
Bottom Line:
Going back to another one of my hobbies, music, this site makes me think somewhere out there someone made a never-released song called, “MILF Porn killed the older woman category of porn”. It’s true, just like the Buggles and their song and video, “Video Killed the Radio Star”. If we look at this porn compared to MILF porn we can see some pretty big discrepancies in how these 30+ year old models are treated and even how they are presented.
MILF porn almost always relies on the old theory around women hit their sexual peak in their late 30s, early 40s. The problem with that is the MILF models are on pornsites. You’re just not going to present the MILF as anything more than a horny slut based on the MILF genre. All Over 30, like FTV MILFs, shows older women being sexy, pretty, hot, posing and everything many of these models never had the chance to do in real life.
MILFs are sexy, horny and all of that, but they’re not cheap, desperate sluts unless in a MILF porn scene. That is what All Over 30 shows. These are confident, successful women who are proud of their bodies and want to show it off. Isn’t that sexy just by itself? The confidence, and I will say it, even when they’re not as in good as shape as they were 15 years ago. You can see the difference between these models and the models on those mommy teaches sites. These women are confident in themselves. Those other MILFs are confident because they made a young guy get hard, not realizing, he gets hard over everything.
All over 30 not only has a huge selection, they have videos with up to 4K downloads, downloadable photosets and the photos are high resolution. There is a useful search engine and tags and a full model list that works great.
You may have noticed my con about the sex videos not being as good as the solo videos. That’s never been truer than on here and it’s not saying the sex videos aren’t good. It goes into what I’ve been talking about with the MILF niche. Nearly all MILF scenes on sites all across the internet are sex, hardcore, minimal lesbian unless it’s with a younger woman. These solo scenes are relatively rare in the porn world. Most models in their 30s are too far beyond the tease or masturbation scenes. It’s why I like these solo scenes so much.
I’ve talked about this with other MILF sites too, you are seeing as natural and undirected solo scenes with these MILFs than you will see on any site. These women have a decade or more of masturbating and being disappointed with sex. They know what they like, and it takes a good producer and director to get that out of a model.
This is as good of a site as you will find in this genre. The site is even easy to use even with the huge size. Everything is high quality and downloads are unlimited.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I liked Slime Wave so much I decided to try All WAM (Wet And Messy). It's a unique niche I hadn't seen before.
Comes with the Tainster Network and the add-on content from Sinx.
The models are a lot like the models on all of the Tainster sites, very attractive, European, usually slim and they are believably turned on.
Could be a great find for those with clothing and wet clothing fetishes.
Scenes are titled like, "Fully Clothed Bath Buddies". This network as a whole is impressive with their different niches.
Close to 500 scenes, 2 have been added in the last 6 weeks.
Older scenes followed a Wet And Messy theme, but some were mud wrestling.
The site works very well.
Cons:
Some of the scenes are tens -- others, the models don't seem to be as into this as on other Tainster sites.
I haven't seen one scene with a man in it.
Video quality isn't consistent. "Older" scenes have HD and True HD, while some "newer" scenes only have Standard Definition.
Bottom Line:
I liked Slime Wave so much that I expected to like this one just as much. Some of the scenes I do, some of the scenes just get too messy. It gets to the point that you can't even see through the see through clothing.
Having been a member of Tainster in the past I still get the feeling they have removed older, less quality scenes. With nearly 500 scenes there isn't much to complain about.
On the majority of the scenes you can download 1080p, 720p and 480p. Some of the oldest scenes only have 480p and 360p options (there's not many of these).
All of the scenes have photos you can download.
One of my biggest complaints is there are no men in the scenes. It seems like a naked man or a clothed man getting wet and messy would add to the niche and add more depth to it. Most of the scenes are two women and those are the best ones on the site. It looks like two women just don't make as big of a mess as three or more. Once they have three or more it becomes hard to even tell which model is which.
The best way to describe these scenes is to say -- a woman in clothes, or panties, is going to either get water or pudding or milk or some kind of liquid poured on her. The women then rub the liquids in on each other from their head to their toes. You can look at the beginning outfits to tell which scenes are going to be best. The ones with white t-shirts or white pants or white blouses are going to be showing a lot of see-through parts.
This is the part of the review that will either sell you on the site or turn you away. There's not a lot of sex in it. There's not even a lot of nudity in it. If you are into women touching themselves over their clothes or being touched over their clothes this site does that a lot. There are parts where the women start groping each other after 15 minutes of no touching. It gives it a believable feeling of them becoming aroused.
I liked that part for the sake of it being different than what I'm used to seeing, but if you require nudity then you might not like this site as well as their other sites. There were a few where I wanted the women to get naked, but they didn't.
I think that's a situation where you have a site sticking to their niche too well. The whole focus here is getting the women wet and messy.
I did notice the differences in download quality as well. One of the first scenes they have listed doesn't have HD or True HD option. Four pages in, every video has HD and True HD.
It's a good site in a niche I didn't even know existed. Some of the erotic parts with the touching over clothes are very sexy, but most of the scenes drop off too much from the no nudity and no sex.
It's worth checking out if you are a member on Tainster, but I wouldn't recommend it as a standalone site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young, slim, pretty models doing all sorts of things to themselves.
464 models on the site and these are mostly pro if not all pro models. I don’t know a lot of models by name, but recognize most of these.
There are an incredible 3,250 videos and 3,494 photo sets.
They are averaging an update per day, these do alternate between photo set update one day, video the next and they are not of the same model.
The videos and photo sets are downloadable and I have not seen anything about limits.
The quality of the videos and photos is very good.
Cons:
These young women look more like I do and there does not seem to be a break in slim, small boobs, small butts, they are also all shaved.
It is an older site and you can see a difference in the performance quality by the models. It is not a big difference, but if you watch an older scene it seems better than the newer scenes.
Bottom Line:
I strayed too far from my comfort zone last month. While I do not consider myself a lesbian or bicurious even; I do enjoy watching women masturbate. I believe it is a deep fantasy in my head they can see me too. The scenes on here change a lot if you scan through the years. Most of the newer scenes are fingering, small the average size dildo, standard vibrator or the wand-type vibrator. The older scenes are more explicit and you see more fisting, larger dildos and the models -- in my opinion -- pushing themselves to their limits. It is not really a complaint. It is just a difference I notice.
The women are mostly all attractive, cute ones, some are very pretty, some are gorgeous. Can I imagine this is what I looked like nearly 20 years ago? There are some lesbian scenes and I wish there were more. The lesbian scenes on here are very good. I did as other reviewers mentioned and checked out the island vacation videos. I would pay for a site with just those type of scenes on it. Those are excellent.
This site is a technological wonder in its quality. The photos I have downloaded have all been at a minimum of 4000 plus x 2500 plus, with some being even bigger. The picture quality is good enough to impress me and I am not usually into pictures. The models make the picture sets good. They seem to all be into teasing and being playful, then turning to a dirtier, naughtier side later in the sets. One of my all-time favorite sites -- Nubiles, could take a few lessons in photographing young women from this site.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p and separate WMV and DIVX/AVI versions too. I believe the photo sets are consistently better than the videos. The videos are much better than the softcore sites I am used to, but I am thinking this -- young, slim, small boobs, small butt, all shaved, combined with just solo masturbation makes the videos seem similar. They do have some solo videos where they do more with the way the scenes play out, but it was -- again, in my opinion, better in the older scenes. I have the same complaints with the other top softcore sites too.
The site is huge. There is no way I could go through all this content in a month. Combining photo sets with videos puts the total number at over 6,700. This is one of those sites I would not complain about if they were not updating.
The Behind the Scenes videos helps that video number out, but this goes back to the photo sets being as good as the videos. The Behind the Scenes videos are as good as the regular videos. You can tell this site cares about their quality and the models enjoying themselves. It shows even more in those Behind the Scenes videos.
This site really impresses me, but I would like to see more lesbian scenes and more of those vacation scenes. Something else I really liked about it is most of the models have a lot of scenes/photo sets. I believe that shows best by looking at the total number of models at 464 with 3,200 videos and 3,400 photo sets. Some of the models have more than 10 videos and 10 photo sets on here. It is interesting to me to watch how the models change from scene to scene. I do not think they film all the scenes of each model on the same day or in a week even. It looks more like they bring models back months, even years later and you can see how much the model has progressed in her confidence. One of my favorite sites. I will have to watch for a year special on this one.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A variation of solo-based sites with some extreme insertions, outdoor scenes and cute girls.
Some of the models make me feel old, but that is okay. The models on this site are slim, few maybe none have implants and they do seem to enjoy themselves.
The site has improved by leaps and bounds in how it works. I was a member here many years ago. It used to be hard to find anything. It now is one of the simplest sites to use.
Most of the models have more than one scene or photoset. There are 424 models total with nearly 3,000 videos and over 3,000 photosets. I like when a site does this instead of having a new model in every scene.
The impromptu lesbian scenes are my favorite lesbian scenes I have seen.
Cons:
The sign-up and entrance as a new member could be easier. You have a whole page of other sites the Met-Art network offers to pick as add-on sites. There is a link to bypass it, but it is one line of text compared to 8 or more large photos for the other sites.
The staff selection picks are on here just like on Sex Art and they are the same scenes. You have to pay extra for those.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined ALS Scan, I thought ALS was the name of the producer of the content. ALS means All Ladies Shaved.
The content is mostly solo. My favorite scenes on here are the ones with more than one person, but the other person or multiple people are not fully interacting. Those scenes give you the feeling the model just decided to masturbate even with clothed people sitting around her. It is a very basic idea, but it is not basic once it enters the viewer's mind.
I even watch the behind the scenes -- scenes. Unlike most behind the scenes videos, ALS shows every step of their filming. There are many that show the assistant (female) touching the model a little more than needed. It gives more of a look into the model's personality and even shows how much she likes being touched even if not in a porn scene.
I would guess the producer added those behind the scenes videos with extra touching with the plan of one day having a behind the scenes video to turn into a full blown porn scene. If they did not plan that they probably claim they did since it does happen.
There's something different about seeing an assistant ask if she can kiss the model that adds a lot to all of their scenes. It makes me wonder how much of this extracurricular activity goes on in all porn. My thinking is not often. You can see and feel that the ALS models are giving genuine, horny performances. I want to apply for the head baby oil applier! ALS might not even realize the female fantasy they are creating for women viewers. I know I would be a lot more likely to rub baby oil all over a cute, nude woman than jumping right into a lesbian scene.
I am not usually a person that views pictures or downloads them, but one of my very first internet searches for porn -- about 15 years ago, brought up a photo set from ALS Scan. They have some of the most natural and unaltered photos. Their outdoor photosets are life-like. You can download the photosets in zip files.
The videos can be as simple as a woman masturbating on the bed to masturbating by the pool. They use various items including those from gynecology and what I consider extreme dildos, but those are not as common here as on sites labeled as extreme penetration. You will also see some fisting. It does not appeal to me, but like the extreme dildos, it is not that common.
The videos can be downloaded from 270p up to 4K. I tried to get a count on the amount of 4K videos, but received a page that said, "Page not found". The option to see only 4K videos seems to be broken or missing. In my browsing, I have seen 4K labeled videos back as far as 2015. The quality of their videos is very good.
My favorite scenes are the impromptu lesbian scenes, the casting scenes and the ones with the non-participating clothed people visible. I don't like feeling like the only one watching the model.
A month is never enough. I usually join it for 3 months at a time. Their streaming player is one of the better ones I have used. I stream the behind the scenes ones to check for any extra action in them. I would recommend it to anyone looking for fun, believable solo scenes with added bonuses of lesbian and even a few group scenes. I have no comment on the male with female scenes. There are not many of them. I haven't watched any of them. Those seem out of place on this site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
I have been in an alternative mood lately and have to say, this may be one of the most underrated sites on the internet.
Very large site considering it’s a newer site. They have almost 500 videos and 500 photo sets.
1080p downloads for all videos.
Picture sets can be downloaded in high-resolution zip files
Gives new meaning to screwed, blued and tattooed.
No download limits and it’s 100% exclusive
Cons:
As a fan of tattooed porn, I have said it before and continue to – do tattooed people never have regular sex or play sex games? It’s all hardcore at 120 MPH.
Missing a few pro favorites.
Bottom Line:
Alt Erotica continues my alternative porn journey that included the great solo site of Joanna Angel. Burning Angel is likely the best known alternative porn site. Alt Erotica takes different spins at alt porn. There are the reality based scenes of a young woman going to get tattooed in a parlor, only to end up having sex with the tattooist, his friend and a cameraman or two. Sarcasm drips as I say the sacred sanctity of the tattoo parlor.
Am I the only one that has always wondered if sex happens in a tattoo parlor? I’m just wondering since this is the first site I’ve seen use the idea. The scenarios are believable at least to me they are. There’s a focus on women getting nude and opening their legs in front of strangers (tattooists). It’s good, I like it and it’s very believable.
The site as a whole is great. They have high quality downloads. No download limits, good navigation and it’s creative. The picture sets are good and are well-edited. You could look through a picture set and explain what’s going to happen in the video. It just feels like this site is ran by experienced professionals. No download limits, no gimmicky pricing, all exclusive content and other than a few exceptions – they have every hot and sexy tattooed model in porn on this site.
I don’t think I will ever know why all tattooed pornstars can only operate in fast, hardcore sex, but maybe it’s best that I don’t know. The biller continues to show the professionalism as they have billing by Epoch. They do send me emails every few months and offer a promo. They also offer a yearly promo around the holidays. I could see someone joining this as their primary or favorite site. It’s that unique and has quality in everything they do.
I think Alt Erotica is neck and neck with Burning Angel for the top tattooed hardcore site. I also believe Alt Erotica has better stories and premises than Burning Angel. It’s one of my favorite sites and if you’re remotely interested in tattooed models, it will probably be one of your favorites too.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large gaping site that focuses on anal sex (not a favorite mine)
They have 863 scenes. It updates twice per month.
Video downloads do vary with some scenes being old, but the newer ones have up to 4K.
Downloadable videos and picture zips (as long as you pay for the subscription with downloads)
Very pretty models, not exactly the type of models I expect in anal porn. Most are European.
Cons:
It is subjective, I am not a big fan of anal porn, but if you can do more with it than just 25 minutes of anal pounding, it will at least interest me. I find a lot of anal sites, the scenes, come off as punishing. This one doesn’t give me that feeling.
There’s not much variety. That goes for the style of scene, the looks of the models, the body types, the settings. There’s a lot of sameness from scene to scene.
It’s anal porn, that’s all the story you need and get. I’m just being honest, not sarcastic.
Bottom Line:
I will give this site some credit. I usually do not like anal porn sites. I am halfway through a year subscription to Adult Time and am working my way through the sites. This one is acceptable enough anal porn. I want to put laugh out loud. The models are very pretty. Most of my early interest in porn was Nubiles. I am familiar with the European models. Most of the anal sites I see today are American. You have the, am I going too far, brutality of the punishing anal scene? It’s not me condemning it. It’s me questioning if the producers of this type of porn only does what my last con said? You just don’t get a lot of story or build-up or lead-in. It is something I believe porn producers have to start thinking about. It is why I am going to give this site some credit but am also going to talk about the problem I have with this genre and how it is filmed or produced/directed/written. One of the newer scenes is a gorgeous woman named Jayla De Angelis. She is swimming nude; she goes up to her balcony and is masturbating. The neighbor is watching and he’s masturbating. She’s giving him a blowjob by 4 minutes in. Between the 4-minute mark and 10-minute mark, there’s some blowjob, then anal for the last 15 minutes. It seems lazy. I know women that have anal sex with their husband or boyfriends. I have never heard one say, after 9 minutes foreplay, he jumped right in her butt. The bigger picture to what I am saying is, I think the anal focus, plays to such a large fetish for so many men, it lets the producers/directors/writers, just cruise control through the scene.
This site at least has some non-anal content. It will turn to anal before the scene is over and that’s why I am at least giving it some credit. They have another site that is called 21 Erotic Anal. It has 267 scenes on it and I like those. That is figuring into my review of this site specifically, it does look like the producers of Asshole Fever realized to try a more erotic, sensual version of the site with 21 Erotic Anal. I just wished there was something separating foreplay straight to anal.
If you add the 267 scenes on 21 Erotic Anal, you end up with 1,130 scenes, when adding those to the 863 scenes on Asshole Fever. You are going to have to go through those and find the ones that you like. I think the anal genre is geared directly at those that love anal sex. If that’s you, you may love all these scenes. There are good download options from 160p to 4K on the last few years. Before that, HD with 720p and 1080p as the highest options. I can recognize the quality of the scenes. It just depends on if I’m being completely subjective or objective. It’s a good site for what it is.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very attractive, masculine-look, gay solo model.
There are only 18 solo scenes, but they do something on this site that I do enjoy and that is two guys masturbating together. Surely that really happens?
Good download quality with most of the scenes having up to 1080p
A total of 114 scenes, some of the gay sex scenes on this are good. I’m shocked by how my back arch some of these guys have.
The pictures are downloadable, but I would only say they are okay.
Cons:
I was pretty sure I had this figured out. Solo gay models are listed as solo because they are in all the scenes on their site which makes it a solo model focused site, right? Not really. This one is advertised as solo masturbation. But only 1/6 of the scenes are solo masturbation.
Nearly half the scenes are “on the set” which I know from female porn sites, are usually called, “behind the scenes”. It does cut the amount of sex scenes down some.
Bottom Line:
If there was going to be one of these solo gay models, I really wanted to be a solo masturbation model, Austin Wilde was it. He’s very handsome, he doesn’t have a too masculine look, but he looks like an athlete. He has a little bit of a rugged look. And his solo scenes are very good. I don’t know if he is that greatly endowed or if it’s where he’s so athletic looking. I know a lot about size perception. You figure this stuff out when you watch enough men masturbating in porn.
The gay sex scenes are some of the better ones on this network, at least for me. I think the whole attraction to the site is Austin Wilde. It doesn’t seem to matter whether he’s in the top or bottom role, he's almost always erect. That plays a big part in enjoying a sex scene that you really can’t even fantasize being in. I don’t know how these scenes would be viewed by gay men. I have learned a lot though I am not for sure porn fans are the best or most qualified teachers. Austin does everything. He takes anal, he gives anal, he takes oral, he gives oral. And I would say he seems to be the last “gay” of these solo models but I’m going to guess I am wrong.
His solo scenes are very good. This is how I believe a man masturbates. He’s not too preoccupied with looking good while doing it. He doesn’t spend as much time trying to show his body off. I don’t think he is that large in endowment, but I could be wrong. He’s kind of hard to tell how big his build is. He reminds me a little of Vin Diesel. I think for a female viewer there’s a good chance for the physical attraction. And he’s not as dominant acting as his build says he could be. I believe he is one of the more entertaining male models to watch masturbate. This is one of the ones I would definitely recommend for straight women. I want to believe he is well-liked by straight women and gay men. It’s just too bad there’s not more solo scenes of him. The video quality is very good. Maybe the first 10-12 scenes only have 480p downloads. The rest have up to 1080p and his scenes are a little longer. I noticed several go over 20 minutes. I liked the one a lot, but I don’t know where else to find content of him. I would like to see him in bisexual scenes with another man and a woman.
Definite amateur models and a black couch that’s in the backroom.
Models are mostly pretty and a lot of them, especially newer ones, are funny and cute. There are over 700 models.
Scenes are full featured, is that a term? Interview, tease, sex, it’s all in one scene.
Updates a little more than once per week, I’m counting around 6 per month.
Good blend of models (race, body types, kinkiness level)
Cons:
It's similar to Exploited College Girls, there’s really not a lot they are doing wrong. They do have a download limit listed, but I haven’t hit it. It looks high to me with 25GB per day. I’m not a hoarding downloader. I download what I know I can watch.
Shouldn’t it be repetitive if the women are amateurs and new to the porn field? There seems to be a line you can’t cross with newbies to porn modeling. I think the viewer accepts that to get to see new, fresh models.
Bottom Line:
These two sites – Backroom Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls are a real find for me. I seem to only want to stay in my comfort zone of mostly glam, softer content and it’s not for lack of trying. I have tried many hardcore sites and wished I hadn’t. These sites walk that fine line between, “You’re trying to see how much of her innards you can pull out” and “That’s just two people have fun, passionate sex.” It may be because I’m a woman. This site does it as well as Exploited College Girls.
The models are probably a bigger deal to females than males. I know that sounds dumb since I’m not a lesbian, but it’s not just about looks. I think as a woman, I want to think young women just kind of stumble into porn. Like I did the backseat of that guy’s car in college. These scenes give me that feeling. The ladies do a good enough job of showing up in what looks like a casual outfit for a job interview. The guys are not enough asshole to make me feel like they’re really trying to exploit these young women. As I told in the Exploited College Girls review, the girls wear the guys in the newer scenes. It’s nice to see the shift happening in porn. It didn’t have to be a major shift. It could be progressive to show women can be horny too. It does make me laugh since these guys are handing money out. Maybe someone could make a porn site where they have a bet with the woman. If they can get her to have sex without pay, then she won’t ask for pay. You know the webmasters would be all for that. They’re placing personal ads for smooth-talking men. I have always believed that pay takes away from the realism in porn. Maybe everyone does have a price. That is where typical hardcore does not do well with me. I start thinking there’s no way she agreed to this. She’s just doing it to get her money. That loses me. This site and Exploited College Girls, don’t give me that feeling.
The scenes can be downloaded in HD. There are pictures. The navigation is basic and simple as it should be for a site like this. I find looking at each woman to be one of the most interesting parts. A lot of these women do not look like they have plans to be in 10,000 porn scenes. I do believe the most interesting is when you get the woman that looks like she shouldn’t be in porn, and I mean that in the way that she looks like a potential Hollywood actress. You also get the other side of that woman would probably shoot a new scene every week.
The tags work well even though I don’t use them. I just start at the beginning and pick 6-10 scenes to download and watch over a week period. I think considering they give you this site and Exploited College Girls this could be a long term join for me. If you combine the sites, they are updating 12 times a month and have over 1,500 scenes between the sites. They do give you a third site too. I haven’t checked the third site out just because of the name. It’s Black Ambush. That has the sound of every site that has turned me away from hardcore. I will eventually check it out, but for now I’m happy with Exploited College Girls and Backroom Casting Couch.
I would definitely recommend joining either and getting both to any porn fan. I did score Exploited College Girls a little higher, but you get both sites so there’s no reason to prefer one of the other when you can have both.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge black dicks, most described as more than a foot long
Barbie is cute and very playful
Cons:
Too expensive and PU does not have a discount
TBP had a review in 2014 that showed 27 video. It still does. Not updating
The best quality is Standard Definition. The site is probably from before 2010.
Only visually boring internal cumshots
The scene descriptions are uncomfortably borderline racist. Definitely stereotypical.
No interactons with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite.
Bottom Line:
The preview says she is he queen of the black guy creampie. The site says it has 30 videos, there are 27, and is adding updates regularly and it is a dead site. Unfortunately when looking at the low quality content, all you see is in Standard Definition. By my guess, that would mean this was actively updating before 2010. The video count is far too few and it says they were all added in 2021.
So who is Barb Cummings? She is an attractive thin blond American model who was on several sites before getting one just for herself. Here, she comes across well and has a hot personality. The premise is that her father taught her to hate black men. Out of pure spite, she wants to go in the complete opposite direction and have a black baby. Did I leave out that her goal is to show her getting pregnant on camera? In many scene descriptions she says she is disappointed with yet another pregnancy test. So on to another two or three black men to try again. She describes her partners in very stereotypical ways. In many cases the reason she is with so many guys at once is that they would not do the scene if they had to pay child support. Many possible fathers, no 18 year monetary commitment. In two scenes she has pornstar Gia Paloma help her.
With pregnancy a goal, she has managed to find a way to do scenes that have a unique theme for porn. However, as a woman, I want to see cum shots. These are all internals. In a few scenes you see the cum dripping out, but that does nothing for me. It does zero to get her pregnant either. On the other hand the black guys are really dark and huge. She describes them as footlongs and even more. I don’t think that is literally accurate, but they do look really large.
The downloads were fast, the site uses tags for searching and you also get a photoset for each video. There are no interactions with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite. The site is what you see and you should never expect any updates or other changes.
I could not resist and I cheated and looked her up online. Years ago she was pulled over for speeding and gave the trooper a blow job to get out of it. She recorded it all, posted it online and he lost his job. She was married from before this site was active and had a white baby with her white husband. It was just a way to get noticed. If you find her fantasy to be hot you can try out this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month.
Cons:
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche.
Bottom Line:
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I can just imagine the first time someone thought, “I think I’ll record my face during orgasm”. The premise of Beautiful Agony was born that day.
It is as realistic and genuine as a site can be.
You’re going to get some of the best scenes you’ve ever seen, but as is the nature of amateur self-submitted, some are not worth even watching.
It's one of the only sites I have been a member of that makes me feel like nothing really matters except the performance.
Sometimes I think, the thoughts going through my mind when watching these scenes, would make some great porn scenes!
It's a great alternative to the overproduced hardcore, overacted “story” porn.
Cons:
Just about all the pros could be reversed into cons. This is truly a site that is it what it is.
There could always be improvements in amateur sites, but at least for me, that’s a big part of the charm of a site like this.
Bottom Line:
Try imagining an attractive woman telling you she’s going to masturbate and record her face during it. Would that intrigue or interest you? Does it excite you? Does it sound too tame? All those questions are ones someone joining Beautiful Agony, should ask themselves before joining. I do believe this is a site that has a core audience sticking with them for months, even years. It’s a very specific niche and that makes it a narrow-niche site.
I tell myself that and wonder just how much or how many people are really just into the moment of the climax? I would think those into female solo videos would be into this niche. I don’t know if someone into hardcore or even porn with a plot would even like this niche a little. The plot of every scene is the same. The woman is going to masturbate, writhe on the bed or whatever surface she’s on, moan, but there’s a good chance you’re not going to see the explicit penetration or stroking. I say all that like hardcore porn and porn with a plot doesn’t eventually lead to an ending with climaxes.
This pulls together the strongest points of Beautiful Agony. If a scene doesn’t seem as good as others, it’s likely the model just didn’t time her expressions right, which tells us how real it is. I remember hearing about one female pornstar who didn’t like the camera to show her face during orgasm. It was on a hardcore site. She said she made some of the weirdest, strangest faces during orgasm.
Beautiful Agony has a dichotomy for a name. And their content lives up or even down to the title. There’s no airbrushing or editing. It might not be as hot and sexy as an overproduced site, but it’s real and there’s no way to fake it.
They have around 15,000 videos of various lengths and some of the videos are very short. As I mentioned earlier, I’m not for sure the technical quality really matters with this style of porn. If you cleaned up some of the videos, had better camerawork, better sound and lighting, it very well could take away from the “in the moment” style of porn they are going for.
I do think this site is relatively easy to recommend to others, but only because it hits on some rather underfilled niches like voyeurism, not produced or scripted and it’s all amateur models. A lot of people like each of those niches. Beautiful Agony gives you a little bit of each of them.
It's a very good join, especially if you’re new to it, and they update enough for me to come back and join every year. I guess you could say you wish they would include their other sites, I Shot Myself and I Feel Myself, but I believe that would be too much to offer. The sites are close to one of a kind.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough.
Cons:
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it.
Bottom Line:
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very good bisexual men site; maybe the best I have seen.
It’s a big site for the niche. It has 214 scenes. It updates with sex scenes 4-6 times per month. They also have some behind the scenes – scenes. Those are a complete waste for me.
Very attractive male and female models. I think that is the big difference I see in this site than I see in most bisexual male sites.
Videos are downloadable. There are pictures, but it looks like to me you have to download one picture at a time. I don’t see a zip option. Those are just screenshots. Everything is up to 1080p.
My personal favorite part of bisexual male sites is a big part of this site. I will have to explain that. It has to do with the pairings and how the scenes play out. I will start the bottom line with that.
Easy site to use. I used a gift card and received 23 days of membership. The pricing on this site is fairly expensive. Everybody gets a gift card they have no use for. I had one
Cons:
The oldest scenes are not even from this site. Those scenes are from Hot Guys Fuck. Some of those are not bisexual. Some are a man with woman, some are a man with man, no threesomes in those oldest scenes. It’s a small amount.
The price shows as $29.95. It also shows as $39.95. I felt much safer using a gift card.
I think they own a penis pill company and maybe even their own lube line. You get ads for those, and the scenes even include the products. Am I watching porn or an infomercial?
Bottom Line:
The pro I talked about being my favorite part of a bisexual male site is some of these sites try to do too much. My favorite part is when the two guys are doing things to each other while the female watches and masturbates. It can be the other way, too. One of the men doing things with the female. The other man watching and masturbating. You can show all that in a camera view without needing any tricks. This site does that better than any of this niche that I have been a member of. That’s a major pro and a big part of my score. I know that even straight orgy or group sex scenes have the problems of showing everything that’s going on, too.
I believe the attractiveness of these models is rare in this niche. A lot of these bisexual men sites have an older, not as attractive female with the two guys that looked like they showed up for a gay scene. Someone decided to add the older, unattractive woman. This is the only niche I know of that has that problem. On this site, the men are masculine, athletic, handsome, nice bodies. The females look like models you would see on any mainstream porn site. I watch these scenes and feel like I’m really watching 2 men and a female doing something they always wanted to try. There is an excitement. An enjoyment even that you don’t usually see in bisexual men porn. That is why the first paragraph explained one masturbates while the other two have sex. I do not like when they try to get too complicated. Having one of the guys having sex with the woman while the other guy is trying to have sex with the man, all at the same time. They do a very good job of making the three people seem into each other. Not just into the person they are directly with. You would have to watch various bisexual male scenes to see what I’m describing.
I really don’t know what to say about the pricing. It started at $29.95 and that was coming from a promo for $9.95. I was going to join it either way. I clicked to input my payment and it went up to $39.95. I backed back out to the gift card section. The trade-in price was equal to $29.95. I had a $25 gift card. They gave me 23 days. I thought this site was owned by the people that own Adult Time. That is where I first saw the scenes from the site. Adult Time has maybe a dozen of these scenes. I really liked those. That’s what led me to join. Be aware of the pricing. If you have an aunt that insists on buying you a gift card for the holidays from a store that you don’t have a location with 1,500 miles, there is the easy way to join this site.
The scene numbers are not misleading. From my count, it looks like 8 Behind the Scenes videos and those were all released over the last few months. I will explain why I don’t like those. This niche is not one you hear about a lot in real life. I know it happens. It’s just not something that’s common. I need the certain level of fantasy involved in watching the scenes. Those Behind the Scenes videos remove that fantasy. I will even defend the site; they are not using those to replace updates. The updates are still the same as the months that they didn’t have Behind the Scenes videos.
The sex is very good. It’s not for everyone. I do believe this is the niche for aiming at women. I don’t know how I would feel about being in a M/M/F scene, but for watching, it’s a lot better for me than watching gay male porn. Adding the female is the major difference. At times, some of the scenes disappoint me. The newest current scene is one of those. The female has minimal sex in it. She does a little. It’s more her watching and even directing the guys. I hope they’re going in that direction. That’s just going to turn these scenes into gay male porn. Overall, they do a good job of mixing the action up between the genders. This most recent scene, the female is really pretty. I need to be convinced these two guys are into women. She would be the type that I have trouble believing real bisexual men wouldn’t be into. The download options are basic, but very good. You can download 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p on all the scenes. There’s more to like than to dislike. I downloaded nearly all the scenes. It’s a site you should look into if you have any interest at all in bisexual male porn. I’m going to say it’s the best I have seen of bisexual men.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Male, male, female bisexual scenes, groups and orgies.
It's a narrow niche that usually fails to deliver, but Bi Maxx is the best I've seen of the niche.
Over 350 scenes, I can't give an exact number as will be explained in the first con.
Standard for the times, 480p, 720p and 1080p options to download.
The best looking models (male and female) you will see in MMF bisexual scenes.
Includes access to Sinx's sample videos from more than 20 sites.
Cons:
Bi Maxx was easy to navigate the last time I was on it (2016). It's now filled with the most confusing navigation I've seen on a site.
No update schedule, I didn't download any videos from here in 2016, so I don't know how new these scenes are.
Expensive €29.99, about $32 in USD.
Bottom Line:
Bi Maxx offers a niche that could be confusing to some porn fans. Usually when we hear of a bisexual threesome we think of two women with a man, but Bi Maxx has two men with a woman. There's a unique, but also formulaic feel to these scenes. I'm not a porn producer, but I would think you have to get a certain amount of time with the woman having sex with one or both men, time with the men having sex with each other, role (top and bottom) being flipped and there's the confusion of who is going to take the cumshots.
Bi Maxx has a distinct advantage over the two other bisexual men sites I know of, they are owned by the same company that owns Tainster. They have full access to a stable of beautiful female models and many of them appear in these scenes.
I know looks are subjective, but most bisexual male scenes have an average looking female in them. Some of the females in these scenes could easily be A-list European models. I have reviewed several Tainster sites and one thing all have in common is the acting ability. These females seem to be very aroused by watching two men have sex with each other. It's not uncommon in this niche to see women that look bored or even uninterested.
The video quality is very good. There are photo sets too.
Then, the problems start. Sinx is either the new owner of the Tainster sites or it's just a name Tainster is using to signify a change in direction. They have videos (usually 5-20) from other paysites that have no direct connection to them or the content you bought.
The very first time I joined "Tainster" it was called EroMax, Bi Maxx was included with the sites that you now get with a Tainster membership. Now, Bi Maxx has been removed from Tainster and requires a second membership.
You click videos and see the typical porn site page with 15-20 videos, click a button to see more, click a number to go to the next page and you find yourself with several hundred scenes. The confusion returns. There is a section called "channels" it has what to me are 48 DVDs or themed series. These have between 2-4 scenes on each one. I can't tell if these are the same scenes on the videos page. It shows one picture. There's two naked guys and a naked woman, many of them don't show their faces and they don't list their names.
Want some more confusion? When you click on one to view it, it says you have to pay $2.99 to view it. This is a complete mess. The Tainster site works well enough on Sinx, but Bi Maxx seems to be their version of a money pit. Have we reached that part of porn's era where supply and demand will control the pricing of rare niches?
More so than the Tainster videos, these videos being European filmed and featuring European actors and actresses show a major problem with the language barrier.
If a man and woman are having sex you really don't need a story to understand why they are having sex. Even a man, female and female. Then, you watch these scenes and one of the men looks like he's not into it. Why? I can't understand what he says. The acting is good enough in all scenes Tainster films to make it where you can read body language. Could they maybe put subtitles? Or explain what the channels section is for?
One last part on the channels section. They are named just like the Bi Maxx scenes, like, "Bisex Party: Always bet on Bi" but I have to pay extra for those? I'm giving it an 80 for the quality of models, filming and feeling I could give it a 60 for being so damned confusing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site I was first introduced to by Adult Time. It is “raw” blowjobs.
Not a big site but does have 62 scenes and most are long considering the niche is limited. It updates once per week.
If you like women rimming men this site has that in nearly, if not every, scene.
Video download quality is up to 4K with multiple options.
Pretty models, that is one part that surprised me for this niche.
The guys are well above average endowment and the women put every inch to full use.
Cons:
I have joined a few blowjob-focused sites in the past and keep thinking there will be more than just regular suck, to and from head movements and there is, it’s rimming. Which I am not into. They could easily add a different variation in some of the scenes.
Anything I say is going to come off as “being too critical”. Are there not enough scenes of sucking, to and from movements and rimming? There’s more that leads me to try sites like this one. Maybe they don’t realize this is going to become repetitive?
Bottom Line:
I admittedly get frustrated with sites like this one. The video quality is very good. Besides 4K, they have 1080p and 360p. They also have downloadable photo zips that are pretty good. Those resolution options may not even please some people. The newer scenes replaced one of the two versions of 1080p with 4K. The oldest scenes have 1080p in two bitrates, then falls all the way to 360p. Am I thinking too much? They have the 720p for streaming. I don’t see the point of having 360p if you’re not going to have 720p. It says mobile, but my cellphone is 1080p.
The frustration is more about the content. These scenes are about several things. One, to show how pretty the woman’s face is. It’s very close to a POV-style video. The second part is to show what the woman will do besides blowjob. There’s ball sucking, ball licking and probably deepest rimming I have seen. The models’ pretty face isn’t near as pretty with two balls on her forehead and a mound of body hair wrapping around her face. That’s mostly what you will see during that part. She then switches to blowjob and shows how far she can go before gagging. The women are good at blowjobs. The biggest compliment I can pay the man or men, is that there’s a constant erection and it’s above average.
The scenes are longer than I am used to in this niche. Some are around 30 minutes even. That’s a long time to watch a woman bury her face and stretch her throat. I have been told many times in my profession, not to complain, unless I have a solution. It’s pretty easy on this site. Does no one in porn use edging the dick? Does no one use vibrators on the frenulum of the dick? Add some teasing, do something different. You could tell me the name of the site is BJ Raw, I should expect blowjobs. There’s as much rimming and playing with the balls as blowjobs. I like this niche. I would like to see it try and advance a little. I won’t name the Blowjob site, I first encountered with this niche, but it has 20 times the scenes this site has and has the woman doing as much as these women do. This site looks like it’s trying to be a niche site that draws people from a certain fetish into it. They’re not doing anything that different than any other full hardcore site. I do believe they could change that.
There are only around 60 scenes, but it is updating weekly, and the models are generally very pretty. The settings are better than you get in normal porn scenes. It moves around throughout the scene. The setting can even start outside then move indoors. It feels like they are going in the right direction, but they turn back around and just do what is expected. If anything about porn has worn on me, it is the feeling that I am watching the producer’s fantasy. That’s fine if I am, but I shouldn’t be paying for someone else’s fantasy. Switch it up a little. I would recommend watching it on Adult Time. I did take the upgrade offer to it. I have a year subscription to Adult Time. They seem to send me these partner offers about once or twice a month. I should have looked more into the actual BJ Raw site before agreeing to join it. I had one of those turn out to be a very good separate site.
This one is not bad. It is repetitive. One of my most watched niches is this one. I like seeing the nude man. It just doesn’t do enough to make me see the word “raw”. I thought each scene would have some variation. I don’t know how men feel about this part. I noticed it in a lot of these scenes. The female twerking. I’m as tired of that as seeing the same 3 actions happening in blowjobs. I’m giving it what I would call a slightly below average score. There is a lot more they could be doing with nearly 30 minutes per video. Maybe someone will get a laugh out of this. I felt like pushing the woman’s head back while she was doing the rimming and saying, “I think it’s clean enough!” Spit, polish and shine.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great download speeds that are at my maximum.
Comes with 23 high quality interracial sites on the Dogfart Network
The combination of two unusual niches, interracial porn and foot porn makes for a rare, maybe even unique site.
Uses Epoch as a biller and you can pay with Paypal, as well as any of 100 gift cards.
Easy site navigation and excellent download speeds.
PU has a discount
Cons:
A small site with only 56 updates.
4K costs extra per scene.
Bottom Line:
We on Pornusers have very few reviews for foot focused porn sites. The scenes have a variety of sex acts, including oral, vaginal and anal. However, the scenes use the female model’s feet for foreplay, as a break from other sex acts, as well as for the cumshots.
The scenarios vary and use themes that are common on other pornsites. A good example is a recent update where a mother, Kay Carter, and her stepdaughter Percy Sires, are the female talent. The mother teaches her stepdaughter how to be sexy with her feet. The male stars are black and well hung, of course. Prince Yashua is one of the most prolific of male black pornstars and he is accompanied by Donny Sins as the recipients of the female attention. The premise here is that the stepdaughter got into a car accident and does not have the money to pay for the repairs to the other car. Her stepmother makes a deal for foot sex in this fantasy scene.
This site has many big name American pornstars such as Aidra Fox, Kenzie Reeves, Shona River, Brooklyn Chase, Riley Reid, Casey Calvert, Veruca James, Chastity Lynn, Kagney Lynn Karter, Eva Angelina, Remy LaCroix, Darcy Tyler, and Giselle Leon. The male models are some of the best black male stars in the business. Leading the group is Rico Strong with 11 scenes, Brian Pumper with 9, JonJon with 8, and Prince Yashua with 6. All of them are simply huge down there and the contrast in color with the white models is striking.
The video download choices are Full HD 1920x1080, 10,000 kbps and 30 frames per second, HD 1280x720 4600 kbps and 30 frames per second, Medium at 768x432 and Small at 688x384. Despite 4K being mentioned in other reviews as available for an extra fee, I saw no mention of this on the site. A recent photoset had 243 photos, 3000x2003 and there is a mix of portrait photos and landscape screenshots.
One criticism I feel is valid is that there are only 56 videos, despite the fact that the site has existed since 2011. That is not much for a ten year old site. In the past few years, it has hardly updated at all. So far in 2021 there are only two. In all of 2020 there were only four. Often sites die and go archive when models are difficult to find. I am no expert, but I can’t imagine models being unwilling to do a site that focuses on feet. The scenes are pretty much sex that you find on most sites and are not extreme. This is far from circus porn that would wear out a female model.
The site navigation is easy and is very logical. You can search by model, by site, by network or by tags. I found the download speeds to be at about the maximum my computer is capable of.
Pornusers has a discount for a monthly join. Epoch is the biller and it is one of the best you can use. Through them, you can pay with Paypal, as well as using your choice of about 100 gift cards.
Between a nice discount and the network having a huge archive, I recommend that this site is worth checking out if you are into feet as sex objects.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with access to the Dogfart Network of 23 Interracial sites
Updates once a week
You can rate each scene.
Four download options. The best is Full High Definition
The site has some of the hottest black men in porn
Some of the best natural chemistry I have ever seen
More than 1000 videos
Cons:
Costs extra for download option for 4K
Older scenes are not in HD
Bottom Line:
In my opinion, interracial sex pairs those of any two races, however, in porn it generally means black men and white women. This site has that, but not only blond women, but also white women of all hair colors, as well as black men with Latinas and also Asians. The site also touches on a few specific niches, such as large men and petite women, as well as some scenes are older/younger. Some scenes are gangbangs. The contrasts are often sharply drawn and very striking to the eye. I saw a scene with Cindy Starfall, who is tiny at 4’10 and whose partner Mandingo has a 12” penis. Seeing it in her mouth was just incredible and oh so memorable. I love contrast in porn and this is about as good as it gets in my opinion.
In most porn today, the women have the star power and are the major focus. Let’s face it, the guys are pretty much interchangeable. In some porn, they don’t even get billing and you never get to know as much as even their names. In some types of porn, for example, Point of View, you may never even get to see their faces.
The guys on this site include major black male models. Some are so well known for their scenes that they even have their own websites. This site has a lot of stars that have a large following, such as the legendary Lexington Steele, Sean Michaels, Prince Yahshua, Wesley Pipes, Shane Diesel, and Mandingo. These men are very, very dark and have penises that can only be described as huge, maybe even the biggest in porn. I don’t think they make condoms this size. If you read pornstar interviews, the female models often mention these guys as among their favorites to work with as they are kind as well as considerate sex symbols for many women. These female models are seasoned professionals who are among the most popular. I have seen them before on other sites, but I feel that here many of them have their best scenes. I don’t know if it is the size or the color of these guys, or maybe both, but something works well here. One of my favorite scenes, for example, stars Cindy Starfall, who has some of the best Jerk Off Encouragement as well as overall sexy talk in her oral sex videos. On this site her face just simply lights up from the first glimpse at these penises and their size. Suddenly the talkative becomes speechless. She must have seen quite a few penises in her life and she should know an outstanding one when she sees it. A few of the stars that I really like are also here, such as Esperanza Del Horno, Eva Angelina and Gina Valentina.
There is a chemistry in these scenes that is a hallmark of interracial porn. I think that both the men and women are on their best behavior and give performances that show how they feel about making these scenes. Far too much porn is repetitive and by the numbers dull, but these come across as the performers finding a natural attraction. I personally don’t care that much that they are of different races, but I do care a lot that the models look like they love doing this kind of sex scene.
It is mentioned on the site that they have won numerous XBIZ and AVN awards, the porn version of the Academy Awards. These are given by their peers in the industry and show how well made the scenes are. You see an attention to detail that is outstanding, from the makeup, to the camerawork, to the lighting and of course the direction. I don’t know if there are classes for learning how to make good porn, but these videos would be great as teaching tools.
The sex itself is straight to the point and there is no real storyline. Mostly what you get are more like simple scenarios such as going to visit your boyfriend. He is not home but his brother is. The woman is a stripper at a bachelor party. The woman is interviewing men for a job as her bodyguard. Many of the scenes are three ways, many four ways and some are even more. The site is easy to use, with one new update per week. There are no download limits mentioned and I did not hit any. There are an incredible more than 1000 videos and photosets, but the frosting on the cake is the access to the rest of the Dogfart Network. You have a similar site, but age focused, called Blacks on Cougars, an interracial lesbian site Zebra Girls, two gay interracial sites as well as a few sites that are rare in porn, featuring black women and white men.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site that was recommended to me by PU member mbaya and it's exactly what I was looking for. More softcore, dancing, stripping and teasing.
New videos are added every two days.
The number of videos is more than 1300. Each one is around 10 minutes.
The models have sexy English accents
Pictures for nearly every scene.
There are no download limits.
Cons:
For the most part, the stripping only goes to nude. I would like to see a little more down there.
Doesn’t come with any other sites. I have been a member for two months now and am starting to feel like there needs to be more or slightly different content. Like it could evolve into more.
Bottom Line:
I sometimes feel frustrated as a porn fan. I haven't gone outside my comfortable box much. Some of the most hardcore sites are still turn-offs for me. I tried some sites more focused on photos and those left me feeling like I needed more. It's like I'm going through porn puberty! This site was recommended to me and I really like the site.
What I got from this site was a lot of teasing, softcore stripping videos. There were a few things that attracted me to them and to the site. I like the idea of getting my man all hot and bothered by how sexy I can be when I show him just enough to get his FULL attention.
The women are about my age or a little younger as they were nearly all between 25 and 35. They seemed very comfortable with their bodies, although many were not so perfect. This was just like me too. I liked that they talked in very sexy ways while they slowly stripped, mostly while dancing. Some were not very good dancers, just like me. There was something else here that I have never seen before. When they talked to the viewer, they were asking him to show their cock and stroke it. I found it worked for me too. I would love to try this kind of dirty talk on my man to see his reaction.
Mostly I understood the women who spoke in English accents that I found very sexy. It seemed to add a nice touch of class. I kept waiting on one to ask if I wanted a spot of tea. The outfits such as nurse, stewardess, tennis player etc. made the scenes better as they seemed like there was some roleplay. Being a former Catholic schoolgirl, I still have the odd fetish of seeing women in schoolgirl outfits and they have those here.
I also found it enjoyable in a personal way as five models were named Katy, Kate, Katie or some variation. They could be me!
The site has more than 1300 updates and adds new ones about every two days.
I found the site easy to use and a lot of fun. It at least made me feel like it did more than the photo softcore sites and didn't make me cringe like some of the hardcore sites did. I really like it and would like it even more if they worked in a handjob, tease, CFNM twist.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Massive gay porn site that excels at solo scenes.
Daily updates
Nearly 6,000 scenes and even more picture sets
Downloads are unlimited, and everything can be downloaded.
Fun and playful scenes which I think is different for gay porn.
Video downloads are 4K, HD and smaller mobile sizes
Cons:
Gay porn is becoming “gayer” and less friendly to us straight women.
Mostly young guy models
Bottom Line:
I slowed on my joining of gay male sites. It is the closest straight women have to pornography focused on the male anatomy, but as time goes on, the gayness of the genre has started taking away the ability to fantasize the guys are performing for me.
My cons are not cons for some people and I think even their major audience (gay men) would find as pros. The male models are generally young, fit and clean-shaven. I think there is a large group of gay men who love that niche and if you are one, this site does the twink, metrosexual look very well. The other con is how much gay porn is turning gayer. Little touches that I’m sure gay men love seeing are reminding me I’m a straight woman and not a gay man. Use of dildos is an example.
The review is intended to also promote the site to the gay man audience. There are high quality and unlimited downloads of videos and picture sets. The videos can be downloaded as high as 4K and offer small mobile resolutions as well.
There’s no real story to the scenes. It’s either solo and supposed to be like you’re a voyeur watching the guy masturbate or men having sex with each other. The solo scenes are good enough for me, but do wish they would reconsider the use of sex toys during masturbation. If a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man, I like it. If a man is having anal sex with another man, I can at least fantasize I’m sneaking a peek of them having sex. If a man is sitting by himself and while rubbing his penis, turns on his side and shoves a 9 inch dildo up his butt, I really can’t fantasize I’m involved or interested in that at all.
The site does have daily updates and I believe does the gay porn genre as good as any site. The navigation is also great and it at least lets me separate the solo scenes from the hardcore ones.
There is a playful and fun side to some of the scenes and it’s worth mentioning. I have said many times before that gay porn is far behind straight porn. That is because gay porn, regularly, uses nothing to make it distinctive or original. Some of the scenes on Boy Fun use roles and titles to add some fun and even my first ever exposure to gay false incest porn. That does add a whole new dimension to gay porn since it’s stepbrothers and uncle by marriage as examples. Those scenes at least make sense to the viewer and likewise, it helps turn the genre into aimed solely at gay men. I would rate this site even higher if I didn’t feel out of place watching it, but I felt like this type of gay porn is off-limits for us women.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
