| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Brasil Bimbos
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Included in Adult Prime network
Updates once a week
Many dark and exotic looking full bodied Latinas.
Nice tags for easy searching
Four streaming and download options that include 4k |
| Cons: |
Small site with only 25 videos. Every download uses the same file name.
No scene description or subtitles. The videos are in Portuguese.
There are no photos
Condoms, either a pro or a con depending on how you look at it |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never watched porn made in any country in Latin America, so I was not sure what to expect. I thought porn was about seeing beautiful bodies going at it, so how different could it be? The first thing that I noticed was that there were no scene descriptions or any kind of subtitles. They spoke Portuguese and the models fit stereotypes that are sometimes comparable to those in American porn. The men were generally very muscular, very tattooed and most had their hair cut in ways you don’t see in porn made here. Jhoony Gab has ten scenes and has blue hair. Higor Silva has four scenes and in some has blue hair. Oscar Luz is in six scenes, so I guess these guys are pros not amateurs. These three guys are in 20 scenes out of the 25 on the site and one of those is a lesbian four way.
Most of the women have a mixed race, mostly black look and their bodies can only be called voluptuous and hourglass. Not at all thin, they have larger sized breasts and hips. Most have tan lines from wearing bikinis. Brazil is well known for their beaches and if I went there, I would hope to see women like these.
They are what you might expect from Brazilians who have a reputation for having big butts, however one model is an exception. Indians have a diaspora that includes a lot of places, but I never expected to see one on a Brazilian porn site. Indian women are known for being large breasted, but Sumaya Ganesha is not. She does not have a big butt either. She was named after the Hindu God Ganesha, you know the one with the head of an elephant. He is thought to bring good luck, but we are the lucky ones to see her in her two videos. She has a tattoo of Ganesha on her upper right arm.
In a scene labeled as Autoridade Maxima, in English Full Authority, her guy has sex with Sumaya using a condom. I see no problem with that, as I am not sure if they have the rigorous testing for porn performers that we have in the United States. When he is ready, the condom comes off and he cums in her mouth. Is that safe for her? Although the scene has no subtitles or explanation, he has a badge and handcuffs. She handcuffs him to the bed frame and he does oral sex on her until she cums. Her orgasm seems very genuine too. I have never seen a man in porn go down on a woman except as foreplay. Considering that In most American heterosexual porn the woman’s need are generally ignored, the fact that he does that AFTER he cums is a refreshing surprise.
I thought the prettiest model was Lunna Real, who has a young vibrant look in her videos and wears braces. She has two scenes and in one she just devours his cock and makes him cum inside her mouth. She loved it, it looked unscripted and spontaneous that she made him cum in her mouth. The other was a lesbian four way pussy licking orgy where she clearly was the star of the scene. She should be signed up by a major US or European porn producer and I could see her becoming a big star. Such enthusiasm needs to be rewarded.
In most cases the men are darker than the women. However, I am not sure if that is planned. The sets are generally rooms in a modern house, but not the rich looking mansions you often see in US porn. It is hard to say what the basic premise is in each scene as you don’t know what they are saying. Clearly this is not your dull standard two people in a hotel room and they just go at it. A typical scene starts with her looking at her phone sitting on a deck or she is taking a bath. He walks in and they talk for a few seconds and then they are like animals in heat. The cum shots generally were external and In nearly every scene the woman is boringly passive. In a few scenes he cums inside, or he jerks himself off onto her. I want to see the woman making him cum and enjoying it.
The site has tags that work well and the videos can be streamed as well as downloaded in four options including 4K. Downloads were fast enough and are added once a week. One thing missing is photo sets. I don’t care about that, but if you do, there is a way. If you use VLC player you can create screenshots. If you want to create custom clips of just certain parts, the site has this as a feature.
One video had a few seconds of the gorgeous coastline. A suggestion for future scenes is that if they showed more of that beautiful Brazilian scenery, it would make the scenes better. How about some scenes open with her on the beach in a bikini, then she goes inside and finds a man there? Maybe one masturbating?
I think the site has potential, but only time will tell. With only 25 videos it needs to grow. I think as part of a large network it is worth checking out. |
|
11-07-21 09:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Bums Bus
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Lets Doe It Network
Uses a trusted biller
The site has 134 videos.
Sometimes silly but still fun.
Attractive stars that I am not familiar with |
| Cons: |
Needs more subtitles
Download limit of 100 videos per month for the network
Has not updated in almost three years |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never been a member of a site that is not in English, so I was not too sure what to expect. Well, sex is not about talking, so I kept an open mind. As part of the Lets Doe it Network, I joined for a few sites that seemed promising, but this was not one I had thought about, to be honest.
Some of the videos have subtitles and it was not hard to imagine that the scenes where there were none were probably very similar. The guys joke, kid around and in general act silly, like college students on a break. The videos even have a feel of being produced by amateurs. Your average scene shows them driving around in Berlin, looking for women to entice into either showing some skin or, if they are really lucky, she has sex in the van. The showing the skin idea was that they would offer money to see her breasts.
When I was a college student, I felt college guys were not very mature. Now, I felt the introductory parts were like a film about the college guys themselves and the women were to be seen as conquests. Because the videos were overly long, I found that I skipped ahead to the sex parts as that is what I was there for. I thought the scenes were rehearsed and not spontaneous and it was hard to imagine myself as the woman. The scenes that started off in public were just ok. My two favorite scenes had the tables turned and had a woman cruising the streets for guys to pick up. Although I could never do that myself, it was a fun fantasy that I could relate to.
I don’t know anything about German porn, so I don’t know if the women were amateurs or pros. The guys were about average looking and seemed to be of about average size down there. The cumshots were ok, not huge or anything exciting to watch.
The site is easy enough to use and there is a tag system for searching. There is a monthly limit of 100 videos for the network. They have 134 videos but when you see the download limit of 100 per month, I prefer to keep those from the other network sites as opposed to these here. For me the other big negative is that the site has not updated in nearly three years. I would not join for this site alone. But, the rest of the network is an astounding value. |
|
10-19-21 12:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Burning Angel
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Alternative, tattooed, rebellious, sounds like my college years, except for the tattooed part.
This is a large site with 1,544 scenes but take note: It has not updated since mid-November 2021. That is two months. It was averaging two scenes per month. There have been none over the last 2 months. I don’t know if the site is now dead or not.
The newer scenes can be downloaded in 4K.
If you like hardcore porn, you will probably like this site a lot. Including hardcore lesbian scenes. Which is unique to me. You don’t see really hardcore lesbian scenes on a regular basis.
Bondage, BSDM, gags are all featured in different scenes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating. That is a newer problem. The last update was on November 14, 2021. I have kept up with this site for several years. I wouldn’t be surprised if it starts updating again. They seemed to be going through some changes with the types of scenes. Maybe it’s just temporary?
I believe the lesbian scenes really stand out as good. The rest of it is going to push a lot of boundaries for people. It’s quite hardcore and rough. |
| Bottom Line: |
My original interest site was based on the fact that I was kind of alternative, rebellious young woman in college. I never did get into the tattoos. I think the star of the site, Joanna Angel, is really sexy. I had enough reason to like the site and keep up with it. I won’t talk too much more about the sudden stoppage of updates. If/when it changes, I will update the review or post a comment. Right now, it has been over 2 months since the last update. There was a change going on. The site adopted a theme of having 3-4 scenes that followed a similar story. I believe overall, the site is a definitive hit or miss site. I don’t believe there’s much middle ground for porn fans. If you dislike tattoos, the site is pretty much out for you. If you don’t like hardcore porn, the site is pretty much out for you. They’ve not found a happy medium. The lesbian scenes are even much more hardcore than we expect from two or three women.
The quality is there. They have up to 4K downloads. It’s not as hardcore or polarizing as Kink Network. It’s close. You have to throw in the tattoos. The majority of the newer scenes do take a more BDSM, bondage, gags, whips style approach. I believe that is hit or miss. I don’t mean the person swinging the whip. I really like the lesbian scenes on this site. The reason is, I have never had a lesbian encounter and there’s a part of me that believes this more hardcore style is what it would really be like. I’m not at liberty to discuss psychological and therapy topics. I do know there is a certain level of physicality in lesbian relationships. That and Joanna Dark keeps my interest on this site.
Some of the lesbian parts I have noticed: There seems to be real sub/dom tension between the women. Some of these women are not regular porn stars. I haven’t ever seen some of them on any site. The lack of an established role leads to very intense sex. It’s as if each one is trying to establish their dominance over the other. They do not leave out the parts you would expect from a lesbian scene. There is passionate kissing. You can see the escalation of emotions. The women’s bodies even react how their bodies should, between hard nipples and very wet lower regions. There is a realness there. It is why I don’t like BDSM between a male and female. Physically, the likelihood of a female being dominant over a male is just not that likely. If he’s an establish sub and likes that role. That more understandable, but it loses that tension. Someone needs to make a purely lesbian site where neither woman is the established dominant one. That is something porn lacks.
That is the strong point of the site for me. It’s enough reason to keep up with the site. I do have problems with believability in porn. Having a site where I can see and feel the tension, it fixes the believability problem.
The rest of the scenes are standard harder than normal hardcore. I’m surprised how long some of the scenes are. The people are going at it at a fevered pitch. They’re lasting 40 minutes. As a viewer, I believe that loses some of the enjoyment. It becomes punishing to watch. That is the hit or miss aspect for me. Hopefully, the site will return to updating. It is not the first time the site has had a layoff. They were shooting some scenes as self-shot to avoid the Covid restrictions. It could be anything has delayed the current updates. My recommendation is based on my own experience. If you can find certain styles of scenes on this site that, do it for you, it’s a really good site. I don’t think anyone will like all the styles of scenes. Maybe takes a little patience. |
|
02-09-22 06:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Catalina Cruz
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first try at an interactive porn site, I like it, but there are some downfalls.
I don't have a very good knowledge of Catalina, but she is still doing live cam shows on this site and that's something I really hadn't experienced.
I wouldn't want to guess at her age, but she is an older model, she is still very attractive and is very good on the cam shows.
Includes hundreds of her videos as well, but streaming only.
33 other sites are included each of a different model and these also have many videos and photo sets to view/stream with no downloads.
Accidentally clicked pay by Paypal and it said my card was declined, I didn't input a card or make it to the Paypal screen. It redirected me to Epoch which wasn't the original biller.
Subjective as it is, she has one of the prettiest pussies I have seen. |
| Cons: |
There's no downloads anywhere. None of the bonus sites have them. You can't download photos either.
The site is cluttered. It has 8 ads in the right margin and there's a section for Catalina's content plus all 33 included sites are shown too. Maybe the most cluttered screen I've seen.
Have to sign in on each of the 33 bonus sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm still trying different types of sites and saw this advertised as an interactive site since you can email Catalina, you get access to her Snapchat, which I didn't have and she does live cam shows where she sometimes masturbates, sometimes she is more teasing in them.
I'm giving the site a higher score than I probably would most sites without downloads. It introduced me to the live cam show and I have a membership to Cherry Pimps, where they have live cam shows too and you can download them. I just usually miss the Cherry Pimps ones.
As someone that is sure I'm not a lesbian, I found the oddest attraction to Catalina's pussy. She just looks pretty, fake boobs notwithstanding and she seems like a genuine person.
The content is the normal or common kind. Cam shows are fully nude, some are a little more showy and sexual than others. I would imagine a person's mood would change from day to date. The videos are like any porn you can get from any site. There's nothing that stands out about it.
I would like to see more cam shows, the next one is 2/29, the following one after that is 3/8. They do keep an archive of previous cam shows too.
I do think the amount of content helps it a lot except in the cluttered department. Catalina has around 700 videos in her archive and you get another 33 sites.
I don't have as much of a problem with the no downloads part as some do. Most of this content wouldn't be content I would download. I just stream a scene or two at a time and I don't know if that's a negative or positive. It doesn't make me think I wish I could download this and watch it some more.
Of the other 33 sites, I found several I liked including Sienna West, Brooke Banner and the site Licensed to Blow.
Even though the site is cluttered it is easy to navigate since they stuffed everything onto one page. I don't know how big of a deal that is about having her Snapchat. I avoid anything social media-looking as my job has policies against social media.
I did notice the newer webcam shows and videos are 4K, some are Virtual Reality, so it does look like they spend a lot of time and I assume money on making these shows top-notch.
It's a pleasant change for me. She's friendly and talks to those watching her webcam shows. She seems to really enjoy showing her body and she looks like she's having fun. Maybe that's something I have missed in a lot of porn I've watched? The live shows give you more of a feeling that she wants to be there and took time out of her day to get naked for the viewers.
I think if you're a downloader you won't be happy with this site. If you can see it as something you don't see everyday in porn, and just enjoy it in the moment with streaming, it's a good site to join. The Porn Users price also made the no downloads a lot easier to swallow. |
|
02-25-20 01:59am
Replies (1)
|
Review
30
|
Club Bang Boys
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network of 5 gay sites that has some appeal for women.
Currently has 696 scenes and averages 2 updates per week.
Videos and photos are downloadable with no limits.
Navigation is handled through tags.
Group scenes which I think are better than the one on one, but not better than the solo.
Includes access to a large streaming network. |
| Cons: |
Still not enough solo scenes, not in relative comparison to the total number of scenes.
Sites seem to change focus. Gay Public Hardcore has most of the solo scenes on it, but the scenes leading up to the solo scenes are two guys in public. The solo scenes are not that public.
No model list, I have noticed most guys that are in solo scenes have other solo scenes on gay sites. There are also no model names on the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw several solo videos from this network while streaming videos. I probably should have checked further into how many solo scenes they have as the number is under 30, but they are good. The guys for the most part are handsome and fit except for the strange masked man who appears in numerous scenes. I do think the masked man kind of fits the whole feel here since there is no model list and there are no model names on any of the scenes. The one guy you know is the masked man.
The five sites are: Gay Public Hardcore, All Barebacked, Bareback Boy Bangers, Boys Club for Men and Gay Bang Boy.
This is maybe the 5th or 6th site I have joined that are considered “gay” sites, but it the first I have seen with orgies. The site Gay Bang Boy has scenes with as many as 10 or more men in each scene. This has its pluses, since I like to see men masturbating, the ones not directly involved in the sex are usually standing around masturbating. Some are guys just masturbating together. The only problem with these scenes is there are masked men. The masked man referred to earlier wears a black mask that covers his face. The masked men in these orgy scenes are more like Halloween masks. It is just a little strange.
They have 696 scenes with 2 updates per week. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are more like screen captures and can be downloaded too.
Besides the orgies surprising me, a lot of these orgies have men that look 18-21 and some that look over 50. It kind of reminds me of Party Hardcore except they’re in a house with no women. The camera does get lost at times and tries to show too many of the men at one time. It is still is new to me see all-male orgies.
The other sites, Bareback Boy Banging, has some group (5 or less), threesomes and some male/male. It seems like adding more than just two guys makes these scenes more arousing to me – a female.
The site, All Barebacked, is small and hasn’t updated in 2 years, male/male scenes with one threesome. These scenes are a little on the rougher side.
The last, Boys Club for Men, is a blend of young/old and group, a few of these scenes are very good, the five guys in a spa scene is one of the better gay scenes I have watched.
All in all, it’s one of the better “gay” sites I have joined that also at least caters somewhat to women. |
|
04-28-20 09:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An exceptionally large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a bigger than most sites’ collection of videos too.
10,700 photo sets and 7200 videos, all are downloadable.
A site with 3800 attractive European teen models
Multiple updates every day
Comes with over 14,000 bonus streaming only videos as well as a cam site.
More explicit than many other similar sites with mostly masturbation or solo. There are some hardcore sex and some girl/girl scenes too.
Bills with Epoch, a trusted company |
| Cons: |
It had a pre-checked cross sale on sign-up and I nearly missed it.
Annoying advertising in the members area |
| Bottom Line: |
This has to be the best site of this type that I have ever joined. I would even move it just a little ahead of my previous all-time favorite, Nubiles. Not only is there more content than I could watch in even a few months, but the models are attractive and some are to me top-level in looks. On the whole, these might be the prettiest models I've ever seen on a site or network.
There are four types of scenes here. You get solo, masturbation, lesbian and boy/girl. The exceptionally good camerawork adds a lot to these scenes.
About three quarters of the scenes and photo sets are of sexy young women alone, either posing nude or masturbating. Even the guys are nice looking. Few if any are much bigger than average in dick size and they make believable couples with the young and natural looking female models. My favorite part of the site is that most of the models come across as shy and sweet. They seem genuinely turned on by their partners, both male and female. They are so young too!
I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman, but I would consider it with some of these models. They were just that cute and irresistible. None of the scenes were at all extreme and seemed believable, unlike so many porn scenes on other sites.
You will find 10,700 photo sets and 7200 videos, All are downloadable and there are new updates every day. I could not ask for more.
There were some nice bonus streaming scenes as an extra, 14,000 of them as well as a cam site with 8000 models and a DVD site. I thought I only got this site and was happy I got these other extras when I signed up. I think this type of porn could easily be advertised as female-friendly. |
|
01-06-20 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Cody Cummings
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Strange bedfellows, they say: bisexual, straight, gay, hardcore, solo, guy with a guy, then with the other guy’s girl. I like it.
Not as much solo as I would like, but around 1/3 of the 323 scenes are solo. It is advertised as solo. Solo men sites are difficult to find, it’s hard not to use the word hard in a review of masturbating hard dicks.
There are pictures you can download in a zip, but only 25-50 per zip and look like screenshots.
Around 175 of the scenes have at 720p and most of those also have 1080p downloads, look for the con.
The site works well but could use more tags and search features.
Cody, himself, is very attractive, it’s hit or miss on the other guys, though the women are almost all very pretty. |
| Cons: |
Around 150 of the scenes top out at 480p or 540p on video downloads. This site has been around a long time.
Another con that extends from a pro – the navigation can be frustrating. The tags are just not useful.
No longer updating. |
| Bottom Line: |
The star attraction is Cody Cummings. He’s a masculine, gay, bisexual, straight male performer. And he does all those on this site. That means there are gay scenes with Cody and another guy or guys. There are bisexual scenes with Cody, another guy and a female. There are straight scenes where Cody has sex with a female and there are the scenes for us straight women – where Cody plays with himself and lets us watch. I don’t consider the scenes with women to be directed at straight women. Those are a lot like any hardcore male/female scene you can see on any site.
There is the feeling they could have done more with stories and how the scenes work together. One scene has two parts: In the first part, Cody has sex with a male. In the second part, Cody has sex with a female. It wants you to see this as the male and female being a couple and they’re having an affair on each other with Cody, but they don’t put the story together. It leaves it like these are separate scenes with very little relation to each other.
This is an older site than I realized. Nearly half of the scenes only offer 480p or 540p downloads. The other half have the HD formats at 720p and 1080p. The content doesn’t look old. I don’t know if this site normally only offers streaming (it was an option when signing up), but my membership includes downloading. The photos are not much to talk about. They are downloadable, there are not many in each set and they’re from the videos. Cody is attractive enough he should have better quality pictures and more pictures, especially of his solo scenes.
The main theme here is Cody Cummings and what looks like his sexual adventures. He does a good job of selling his preference in each video. He’s very believable in the straight scenes and solo scenes. At times, the scenes with other guys, he doesn’t seem quite as into it, but he doesn’t underperform either. There are no more updates and there are no 4K or higher videos. I think if you’re joining this site you’re doing so just because of your interest in Cody Cummings. None of the other models, including the females, really do that much. It’s very much Cody-centric. I guess that is the whole purpose of a solo model site. Just don’t expect the solo model part to be the dominant action you’re going to see. I was expecting 100% solo scenes. Overall, I’m not disappointed. It is very difficult to find a masculine, male model who masturbates on camera. He’s very good at that and should be where soon to be stars start learning the trade. I don’t know if he is kind of a pioneer in solo male porn. It’s a good site, overall. |
|
12-03-21 08:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Looks like a site has been forgotten. Sexy, teasing, “I think” amateurs.
There are nearly 700 models and most look new to me.
Downloadable movies and picture sets.
It’s a large site with over 6,000 picture sets and videos. It updates daily.
Movies can be downloaded up to 1080p.
Good site for straight or curious women with nothing close to “offensive” happening. |
| Cons: |
This site has been around a long time. I used to think it was a stream-only site. I believe Nubiles used to advertise for it and the launch date coincides with my first time joining Nubiles in 2009. The site’s name may be the biggest con. It doesn’t sound like porn. Sounds like a video game or your weird aunt’s soup recipe.
There’s not a lot of explicit nudity. There’s plenty of nudity, it’s just not gynecological. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not going to be that critical of the content as I found it quite good. I am going to be critical of their marketing. I have heard of this site for more than 10 years, but never joined it. I don’t even think I ever looked at a preview. It’s a really good site. It reminds me of a photo site, kind of artsy, but they do stress there isn’t much makeup. They’re not going for glamour. It’s women next door and that’s not girls, because some of these females are probably in their 40s. If not, don’t say anything, so I don’t have to name which ones look 40s to me. There is a little bit of hesitancy on my part. This is a large site, but it has been around since 2009. I’m a little hesitant and dare I say – gunshy, after reviewing a site awhile back and finding out they recycled the entire site from old updates. This one has new updates everyday and that’s either really impressive or someone is slipping one over on me. An update everyday after being open for 13 years deserves some credit.
What you mostly get with this site is women dressed normally and doing normal things. I think it’s normal for young, pretty women to strip in the shower. That sounds strange. I don’t know anyone that takes showers in their clothes. A site like this, to me, appeals to straight women. Especially those of us that are nearing middle-age. Some of these women could teach a thing or two about being sexy. It’s not weighed down by she needs to get naked and masturbate or have sex. I believe when you give a woman the job of being sexy without sex, you get her best sexy show. She knows she has to make it count.
The question becomes is that porn? Good question. I think it is. A lot of the stripping is in panties, thongs, and it’s not stripping for stripping class. It’s stripping for arousing someone else or teasing. I just don’t think it adds up to the current porn we see. That doesn’t help my questioning of if the content is potentially recycled. It really fuels it. I haven’t seen porn like this since the first sites I joined around 2009-2010. I do apologize to them if I am talking too much about recycling. I hope it could help others interested in the site. That also should be mentioned, I don’t see any 4K scenes. That’s porn’s fault for trying to establish 4K as the standard. Now, anytime I don’t see 4K scenes, I start to wonder if the scenes are older and re-released.
The models are really hit or miss for me. I do believe they are going to be a major part of how you feel about this site. Some, Naomi Moon, comes to mind, are knockouts. While some, I won’t name them, look like the woman that delivered my groceries. That’s a big disparity between models. I will mention that Naomi Moon’s bio on the site definitely tells that it’s new content. She is from Ukraine and the bio says Ukraine is in news for “other” reasons. I wish someone else was a member or could explain why this site does not feel like a 2022 site. Maybe their webmaster knows? I know the more teasing nature of the content could be giving me the older feel from older sites. The styles of clothing could be from poorer countries than what I’m used to. That is what makes the site interesting to me, but I still can’t say it's the porn part that makes it interesting.
The teasing is cute, though some of these women look older than me and I would hope if they’re older than me they know better than to waste their time and years on teasing. I like Yassa Mare’s content a lot.
I believe it takes more to impress without full nudity than it does to impress with full nudity and 7 men having their way with you. I really can’t say who I would recommend this content to. Those that like normal woman? That is what I feel like I’m looking at. It makes women like Naomi Moon really stand out on the site. It’s mostly just normal, fun, women stripping and looking pretty. I don’t know who that would be recommended to. Maybe that’s why the site isn’t well-known? I will say if these normal women were willing to do masturbation, I think it would be a real winner site. They look more like the women that buy the 5 inch dildo AND lube. Innocence is not age-related, it’s experience-related.
I think I’ve talked myself into understanding what’s going on with this site. It’s like it has never progressed and they’re just doing what they’ve always done. I would really consider trying to progress this some. You have women in wet shirts looking at the camera like, “My shirt is wet!” Guys in 2022 would say, “Did you spill your drink?” The nipples showing would just go over their head. You have to be more blunt ladies! I like the site and will return to it. |
|
05-11-22 04:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Crash Pad Series
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that fits unique and different from the mainstream.
Currently 345 scenes
Models are mostly amateur based on my knowledge of models. A few look familiar.
It’s nice to have Epoch as the biller since I wasn’t familiar with this site.
The Behind-the-Scenes videos are really interesting and have closed captioning and subtitles over the last 5 years.
A lot of variety in models which will be the first con as well. |
| Cons: |
Heavier built, tattoos, piercings, these models are more like everyday women, and I know that can be a con for some porn fans.
Overall video quality could be improved. Some of the newer scenes have 4K. A lot only have 360p. And each video only has one download option.
No dates or tags on the scenes. It’s hard to keep up with the various niches they cover without tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found a couple of sites by this company. They won some awards in the earlier part of 2005 for best dyke films. They had a Crash Pad in San Francisco that people would crash in and have sex. That’s more interesting to me than showing up at a studio to have sex for 18 minutes and 12 seconds. I was just looking for something different. I knew that likely wouldn’t turn out perfect.
It didn’t. But it turned out good enough. The main selling point here for me is the authentic sex and real people. Even real emotions. With that comes the reality of not everyone will find all of these models attractive.
The site itself could use some updates. If there are tags, I have not found them. It’s even kind of difficult to get started. I clicked through a few tabs just trying to find the scenes. I have been on a few sites like this one. There’s a learning curve that you will pick up and think it wasn’t that big of a deal once you figure it out. The search engine could be better, but I’m not for sure how. As I don’t know these models and wouldn’t know what to search for. You’re going to have to click and scan through to see if scenes or models catch your eye. I was originally concerned that there are no downloads, but there are. It’s just you only get one download option, and it can range from 360p to 4K. That fits the words needs updating. I don’t have a 4K monitor so 4K files are overkill for me. And 360p doesn’t look that good on any monitor.
Besides the need for updating, the site does a lot right including one of the broadest varieties of performers and niches I have seen. They have bi, trans, the specified “queer” content and it directed by Shine Louise Houston. That is something that could push some away as this does fall under feminist porn. I don’t consider myself a feminist even though I am a female in a male-dominated field. I’ve never really felt the need or desire to be a feminist. I do think that’s a risky word to label yourself with in a field like porn that has half a century steeped in male dominance. Some of the wording could make the site more difficult to understand. Femme, Boi, stud, it’s more than a switch to a different porn site. It’s more like you step into a whole other world.
The site has won a lot of awards and been nominated for others. I am counting 20 they have won or been nominated for. The realistic action is a big part of that. There’s no real fluff like you see in mainstream porn or the that couldn’t be further from realistic mainstream “reality porn”.
I do recognize several models especially Daisy Ducati who is one of my favorites from Kink. That is where several of the models are featured over on the Kink Network. I do wish they did a little more with the user features. Better video quality and tags would make a huge difference. I believe that a lot of sites like this one are as much aimed at mobile users as PC users. I can use either but do prefer PC. Some of the files are even named Ipad. I don’t think that’s a good plan. Why not give the better resolution that works on mobile and PC instead of the lower resolution that is hardly watchable on the PC?
I’m kind of torn on it. The quality of the action is really good. Your feelings about the attractiveness of the models will be subjective. That’s why I believe better user features would have improved everything. It's worth looking into if you’re looking for something different. If they improved the site’s features, I would be more likely to recommend it to everyone. I know how porn fans are. |
|
06-04-22 11:50pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
35
|
Cuck Hunter
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unexpected gem of a network.
Eight sites are included. Nearly all mainstream niches are covered.
High quality video downloads including 4K on newer videos.
Easy to use even though it could be easier.
Regular updates
Good download options. |
| Cons: |
It should advertise as a network. I’m reviewing the site I joined to gain access, and there doesn’t seem to be any mention of the network that comes with a membership.
The navigation will likely leave some wanting more features. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Cuck Hunter for my growing interest in the Cuckold niche, but ended up getting a network that is much better than I expected. Cuck Hunter is exactly what I expected. It’s a standard cuckold site where the wife has sex with another man while her husband and/or cuck watches. It’s a niche beyond a niche. There’s something highly erotic about the cuck watching and masturbating.
If cucks aren’t an interest to you there are 7 more sites and varied niches including transsexuals, nude athletic scenes, lesbian and light exhibitionism.
The network is full of surprises like the 4K video downloads. It has nearly 2,200 scenes across the network and all can be downloaded with no limits. If I felt any disappointment, it was that there weren’t more cuckold scenes. Being a relatively scarce niche makes finding quality scenes like a treasure hunt, and I would trade 1,000 of the videos for 100 more cuckold scenes. I like the different niches they cover, but maybe it’s just me – I sign up for a site or network because the niche interests me.
The most important pro may also be the most important con. The blends of different niches is a good change of pace, but only transsexual is covered in-depth with over 500 scenes. Each of the niches have at least 80 scenes with all but one having at least 100 or more scenes. That is a pro and con. It may not be enough of a niche if you’re new to it, and if it’s one you don’t like, 100+ scenes is a lot to just look over and not download.
For me, this network is excellent and I enjoy the varied niches, but I would warn against joining it just for one niche. This one works better if you like multiple niches they have. Transsexual has never been a favorite of mine, but I do like it and they have some very good transsexual scenes. I like and downloaded a little from each niche.
I believe this network is good for those that aren’t interested in the mainstream niches of porn and want something different. If nothing else you can try out niches that a lot of people are comfortable joining like transsexual and cuckold. The video quality is good all across the network. Th main change they could make to improve the sites and network is putting them all into one network. Otherwise, I believe they are asking for too many unfair complaints from those that join for one specific niche only to find out the amount of content for the niche is limited.
Overall, I highly recommend the network as long as you’re sure you want something different. |
|
11-06-22 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Cuckoldest
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
We’re getting a twist of multiple niches on this site.
There are only 24 scenes, but all come in up to 4K downloads and it is some of the most unique porn I have seen.
One update per month, but this content is so different, I’m surprised they can even get an update per month.
The photo zips are downloadable and are worth at least looking at. I believe those add to how different this content is.
Mostly attractive (maybe) models, both male and female. They need a transsexual in here!
Comes with the excellent Adult Prime network, thank you to the Porn User members that recommended this network to me. |
| Cons: |
If I listed all the potential cons we would be here awhile. I’m just going to say the uniqueness, the different from the norm, may not go over well with all porn fans.
The fact this site will get looked over based on stereotypes. I wish the scenes were longer too. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is going to be fun. Do you like older/younger porn? It’s here. That includes older women with younger men, older men with younger women and what else? Younger men with older men. And more? A threesome between a younger man and middle-aged woman with a grandpa giving both of them oral. At the very least, you should at least look the site up and look at the scenes. I’m not positive on this, but I don’t think any of these models/actors are pros, but they could be. A couple of the younger guys are in a lot of the scenes. I don’t want to make fun of this style of porn by saying it’s like circus porn, but I mean that as a compliment. Over here we have a 70 year old man removing the 28 year old guy’s dick from the 45 year old woman’s pussy and sucking it. The pictures give you the advantage of not having to do a double take. I really like this. I have no idea what’s going to happen. The 60 year old woman is giving the 28 year old guy a blowjob while her 72 year old husband watches. The 72 year old husband stands up. You’re stuck right there trying to figure out what he’s going to do. He walks over to the 28 year old man, spreads his butt cheeks and gives him a rimjob while his wife is giving the 28 year old man a blowjob.
This is what I imagine regular porn was like for people in the 1960s and 1970s. He stuck it where? Is it for everyone? No. Let me say no again. It is creative, it is different, it is rolling up several taboo niches into one scene and doing a good job at it. Being a therapist, I know that a lot of this content will be off-putting to “straight” men. Being a therapist, I also know a lot of straight men at least think about these situations even if they wouldn’t admit it to anyone except their therapist. I do believe there is a market for content like this. I feel harsh saying what I’m about to say. I believe they need to focus on younger women if they really want to reach a broad market. It’s just my opinion, women viewers are often attracted to the hard dick of the man. His age doesn’t matter. I believe male and female viewers are more attracted to the pretty faces and bodies of younger women. I do get that the theme goes into a couple and the older men need an older woman with them to make that more believable, but it’s porn.
I do, however, really like what they’re going for on this site and it’s not going to end with this site. You are getting straight sex and bisexual men in one site. I once heard it’s an attempt to remove the demonizing of gay and bisexual men out of porn scenes that include hetero sex. I do believe that is becoming more common. For years, a threesome meant two bisexual women with a man. This site is doing the opposite of two bisexual men with a woman. They do a good (poor) job of making one of the guys look “shocked” when the other man starts doing things to him, but I enjoyed it. None of these scenes are long, I believe all are under 30 minutes with most in the 20 minute range.
It’s a nice change of pace. They also have excellent video and photo quality. I see it as a much bigger step in the right direction of creating new niches in porn compared to stepfamily. I kind of like this, you never know what’s getting ready to happen style of porn. Good for them for trying to blend mainstream (hetero) with non-mainstream (bisexual male) porn. |
|
10-19-21 01:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Deeper
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the hottest, sexiest sites I have ever been a member of.
The realization that passionate sex does not require effort. That just means the actors on this site do not seem to be acting.
The quality is very high. Up to 4K on all videos.
There’s some BDSM and minor bondage. It sneaks up on you.
Updates weekly, there are 233 scenes – currently.
Models I either haven’t noticed before or they weren’t as good in the scenes I saw them in as they are on this site. That is very important to this review.
Exhaustive tagging system. |
| Cons: |
There is a 25 scene download per week limit. It sounds low, but I haven’t hit it and have been a member for 6 weeks.
Some people may think is too artsy for hardcore. If it is artsy, it’s the most hardcore artsy porn I have seen. |
| Bottom Line: |
A funny way to start this is to say 116 of the scenes have the “spooning” tag. The tags are entertaining. I usually would not give a graphic description of a scene, but it turned me on that much. The guy is covered with tattoos, which I’m not against, but it’s not a favorite either. The female is a pretty blonde. He rips her shirt open and starts groping her chest. In between gropes there are kisses. The female does a Emmy-award worthy (based on porn standards) performance of acting like she is offended, but intrigued. They end up on the bed. He is behind her, still clothed, they are kissing over her shoulder. He has his hand down her panties. She is rubbing over his jeans. They stand up, he pulls his dick out and there’s pre-cum. This is a pro porn star that was so aroused he was nearing premature ejaculation. All of the scenes are not that good. Nearly all are better than what I’m used to.
There is a darker vibe to the scenes. I would even say moodiness. The first thing I thought was I bet they spend a lot of money on these scenes. The setting is different in nearly every scene. I do wonder on the negative side of it if they’re maybe going too deep. This is from one of the pros I listed. I have never heard of or seen Maitland Ward. She has 14 scenes on this site. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a porn model with je nais sais quoi until Maitland Ward in those 14 scenes. It seems like she is getting what the site is going for. Most of the biggest stars are on this site like Emily Willis and Kenzie Reeves. Even the guys are well known with Mick Blue and Manuel Ferrara. Somehow this Maitland Ward stands out. If you give this site a try, be sure to look up her scenes. She’s not the prettiest model on the site.
As much as I compliment the tagging system it is filled with overlap. Anything with more than 2 people is listed as group sex. Even though they have threesome tags. It says there are 65 group sex scenes. Most of those are standard threesomes. I did laugh when I saw the spooning tag. They are going for passionate and erotic. I wouldn’t say it’s the most passionate or erotic porn I have seen, but I would say it may be the most erotic and passionate, hardcore porn I have seen. A lot of the scenes make me look at the producers of other porn sites and say, “This is how you do it.” There is a dual penetration scene with little Chloe Cherry and she looks like she loves it. I’m going to take a shot in the dark and say most of these male models are established, older and I believe they understand what the site is going for. I never thought I would say that.
The way the site is setup is for success. There are 233 scenes. Weekly updates. The videos can be downloaded from 160p to 4K. Those are options are on all 233 scenes. The photos are very crisp and nice to look at. You can download those in zips at above-average quality. It is hard to fault anything specific with the site. People are going to say the download limit of 25 scenes per week is a problem. It’s nothing the content is doing wrong. I could see how some may believe there is a repetitiveness. If you like the content, you’re going to welcome repetitiveness.
It's a site I will definitely return to. I am on my second month. I joined it on the holiday promos and let it recur. It has been pointed out. If you join, the 25 scenes per week download limit, starts the day you join. There’s no carryover. You have 7 days to download 25 scenes. It then starts over at 0 and you have 7 days to download another 25. I first started out picking out the 25 scenes I wanted to download. By the end of the first month there were more than 100 scenes total I wanted to download. I will probably have about 170 of the scenes before this month of the subscription ends. That is a different download limit, and you need to be aware that it’s reset every 8th day. They are making sure you come back often. I don’t see anything disappointing about the site for anyone. I have noticed they use something porn usually lacks. They take an otherwise innocent action, like the guy exposing one of the woman’s boobs and make it very dirty. On the other hand, they take something like the dual penetration scene with Chloe Cherry and make it seem acceptable and normal. Very good site. I like it a lot. If they had more scenes. I would join it for a year. |
|
02-09-22 06:42am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Deepthroat Sirens
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site on Top Web Models that doesn’t just have blowjobs, which is strange since the name of the site sounds like it would be all oral.
A large site with 478 scenes and some very cute, younger female models.
Very long scenes, some nearing an hour each. The videos are downloadable with no limits.
The picture sets are some of the biggest (in quantity) I have seen with some having 700 photos. They are also downloadable.
There are other sites included that I feel are better overall than the sites they focus on. |
| Cons: |
Probably not for the newer porn viewer. There’s gagging, choking, some degradation.
The download speeds on the biggest video files are very slow compared to the download speeds on the smaller files. I can’t even differentiate between the different options since the file takes too long to download.
The photosets are also way too large to download. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to let this review kind of be for the whole network since this site seems to be the flagship site. If you can’t tell, I didn’t like this site very much. Most of the scenes start off with the guy seeing how far he can stick his penis down the woman’s throat. This includes forcing her head to hold in position, even if she’s gagging and I’m just wondering how I ended up joining a site like this. I was looking for something different. It’s different, but not the direction I was looking for.
They have a site called 2 Girls 1 Camera that I really liked. It is rough too, but it includes scenes with one woman masturbating while watching the other woman and the man have sex. It looks like they were on the right track to creating something fairly unique, but it only has 31 scenes on it.
Deep Throat Sirens with 478 scenes of all forms of sex. There’s anal, there’s vaginal, there’s a lot of choking and gagging too. I realized after joining this network, thanks to Deep Throat Sirens, I was thinking I was joining Net Video Girls.
There are technical problems too. Deep Throat Sirens also lists their two top video download resolutions as 1920x1080, but one is twice as big as the other. I have learned about bitrates and thought that’s probably what the difference is, but when I go to download the “Original” it is 4GB and it downloads at 3.5 MB/s. When I download the “HQ” it is 2GB and also listed as 1920x1080, it downloads at 40 MB/s. When I download the photo sets, some of which are 2GB, it downloads at 40 MB/s. I don’t know why the Original is twice the size of the HQ even though their resolutions are listed as the same. They also offer a 540p and 270p download too. The tagging system does not seem to be accurate. They have 72 tags, but some of them don’t seem like they should be tags like two different ones for “pig tails” and “pigtails”. Or the ones that I don’t see the point of like, “Halloween”, “Christmas”, “Valentine’s Day”. There’s a feeling that they are trying to do too much, but not doing any of it that well.
The network as a whole has 1,258 models and 1,870 scenes so it is a good-sized network especially for the price. It’s also not all oral, besides Deep Throat Sirens having all forms of sex on it, the site Big Gulp Girls also has more than oral even though it’s another one that is named like it should be just oral. You see what I mean by trying to do too much? The sites that sound like they may have more than oral only have oral.
I should also mention the older videos including all the videos on three of the sites only have 480p as the highest download resolution. I am going to have a hard time recommending it to newer porn viewers. Some of the scenes on Deep Throat Sirens are more hardcore than anything I’ve seen on Evil Angel or Kink. I would recommend it to those who are into rougher sex and would even highly recommend it since it the size of the network is good for the price. Maybe the tech problems will get worked out and that would also help my view of it. I am just getting the feeling I’m on a network that there isn’t much attention being paid to it or it’s maintenance. There still is no way to know if it’s updating. I can say the newest videos showing up haven’t changed in the 2 weeks I’ve been a member. |
|
03-10-21 01:18am
Replies (1)
|
Review
39
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women playing the male role.
Some of the scenes are very erotic and show chemistry between the male and female.
They have 464 scenes, but haven't been updated in over a year.
I don’t know what the percentages would be, I would think this niche appeals to both men and women -- especially in fantasies.
Attractive female models, the males are mostly attractive, but some of the contraptions they use as props make them less attractive.
Everything is downloadable with no limits. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are just too graphic for me.
The props and way they set some of the scenes up make them uninteresting, unappealing before the scene even starts. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the site I am rating highest on Kink’s network. There are some scenes that I couldn’t make 5 minutes into the scene. If you have watched the horror movie Saw, some of the contraptions and props on this site are reminiscent of Saw. There are metal jaw openers on the men, their mouths stretched to the point that it looks like their teeth are going to fall out. This is why I haven’t found most BDSM sites appealing. Why is the man stuck in that metal mask? There are actions I would rather not see and will list a few for others so they know what they’re getting into. There are scenes with ropes tied around the man’s testicles, tied around the man’s penis and they pull the ropes. There are (never thought I would see this) scenes of women double fisting the anus of the man. Just so it’s known, I also wouldn’t want to see a scene of a man or woman double fisting the anus of a woman. For me, that drives those scenes into a very narrow niche of viewers. Different strokes for different folks, but that just seems like a way to turn more people away than bring them in.
There are scenes that give a completely different feel and view. A woman with a strap-on using it to peg the man while kissing him, while also giving him a handjob, these scenes are some of my favorites. It’s an uncomfortable position for a male, but he’s willing to get the added perks. This seems like something I could see a married couple doing after 10 years of marriage and looking to spice things up.
The scenes I enjoyed the most are the ones where the woman pegs the man, then gives him her vaginal sex. There’s something there that I don’t believe the porn industry has ever figured out. When watching porn as fantasy, we like to put ourselves in the position of one of the stars. By showing the male doing something he probably wouldn’t be comfortable with (getting pegged), to then the female giving him what he wants -- vaginal sex, there’s a chemistry built there even though it is likely manufactured chemistry due to the script. I believe there’s a market for those scenes, a large market even.
The site isn’t that large considering they aren’t updating it. It has 464 scenes with a lot of the scenes I preferred being older ones. It does seem like they started out on the extreme end of hardcore BDSM, it then softened to the scenes I described, and the newer content is a rough mix of BDSM with the scene style I described. All of the scenes I downloaded are 720p. It was the highest download option available and some of those were in the early years of the site. So, while you can’t get 4K or 1080p, you can download 720p on all scenes. I enjoyed the site overall. I don’t think I will join Kink again unless I find another site I like on it. I am adding this as a note about the network as I believe it’s very important to know. The network itself is releasing daily updates. But they are nearly 50/50 gay/straight. I believe that’s important since it means they are releasing more scenes on their Kink Men sites than they were the last time I was a member of it, but only half of the updates on the main Kink site are straight. I could see that being a positive for some and a negative for others.
Divine Bitches is good if you have the time to go through the scenes and find ones that fit what you like to see. I believe if you downloaded 10 random scenes and showed them to me, I would probably like 4 out of the 10. That’s not a bad ratio and I think the uniqueness of the other scenes I do like makes up for it. |
|
06-09-21 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
High quality site for dual penetration fans.
Very high percentage of attractive models.
Newer scenes have up to 4K
Great photosets with high quality and downloadable zips.
658 scenes with 2 new updates per month.
These models make this look sexy and erotic. |
| Cons: |
Older scenes have a drop in quality. The site has been around since 2005.
Not much story, dialogue or subtitles. Communication is usually just moans.
Very professional, may be too glossy for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
European porn seems to be more my favorite. I usually wouldn’t be into a dual penetration site, but with the attractiveness of the female models, and the willingness, enjoyment and nothing too punishing, I really like this site.
The last con is maybe the reason I like the site. Even though the subject matter is of a more hardcore nature, these are pro models and nearly all seem acclimated to doing this type of porn. The models look like they should be on solo glamour sites. It’s a good time to mention the pictures can be downloaded in zips, average of 100 per set and those are 4200x6800 resolution. It’s just an overall feeling of professionalism from the looks of the models to the quality of the content. The videos can be downloaded from mobile to 4K on the newer ones with every option between those resolutions available. The oldest scenes only have 540p as the largest download resolution, but I doubt I will even reach that far back in the site. With 658 scenes and 2 scenes per month it is easy to download 50-100 of the new scenes with the crisp, high-quality video.
I will always mention this since I do prefer a story. There’s just not much story. Two naked guys, a naked woman, three holes counting mouth, two hard dicks, that’s the extent of the story of most of the scenes. The settings are even professional. The colors in the scenes are warm and even bright. I don’t know if it’s just something I have started to notice, but it looks like these models are so used to doing these scenes, they don’t need to talk at all. I believe that’s part of the professional side of it. I would like to see more dialogue. How do two men ask a woman if she wants to have a dual penetration sex scene with them? The scenes are long enough with most averaging in the 30 minute range.
I do think this style of porn probably has two crowds. The one that likes the opposite of this style of dual penetration, where it’s rougher and more of the males controlling the sex. This site does a very good job of convincing me the female is the one controlling the action, the pace, and these models are pretty enough to make that believable. I admit that I am probably stereotyping. I usually don’t think of really pretty, supermodel looking models being in dual penetration porn. Most of these women are just that. They are top of the line looking models. They’re even dressed nicely to start the scenes. Their hair is perfectly done and their makeup. In a way, that kind of makes this porn weird. The woman ends the scene looking like she did at the beginning. Did she even have sex with those two guys? I probably need more exposure to porn like this to really say that this site is as good as it seems to be to me. I’m not used to seeing models this comfortable with 2 dicks in them. I believe they could take a few more. Check it out before joined based on this review. It’s really good to me. Fans of this genre may say it’s too soft or not rough enough. |
|
02-09-22 06:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Dyked
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the better lesbian sites I have joined.
Very good production values and the scenes have an added touch of creativity to them.
Only 74 scenes, but I have downloaded nearly all 74.
Varied scenarios unlike a lot of lesbian sites that stick with a soft background, in the bed.
All videos have 1080p option.
Included photo sets and screencaps. All videos, screencaps and videos are downloadable.
Billing through Epoch or Paypal with Epoch. I had a slight problem with Paypal with Epoch and will explain below. |
| Cons: |
The scenes could be longer, have more story, they have a good lesbian site here and they should keep trying to improve it. It could be one of the very best if they did.
I had a major problem with the billing and it's why I've had the account for 3 months. I don't think it's the site's fault.
How many pretty and cute girls getting naked can you watch before it gets boring? |
| Bottom Line: |
The billing problem, in my opinion, was either Paypal or Epoch's fault. When I signed up for the site through Paypal, I received an email confirming it. I didn't read over it. When it came time to cancel, I went back to welcome email and there's no information in it. No login info, no member ID, and no way to cancel it on Epoch. I sent Epoch an email and they said it was a common problem. The billing is being listed as charged to Epoch Customer Service instead of to the porn site. They were able to find my information based on the Paypal transaction ID. I won't be using Paypal to pay for porn again until that gets fixed.
This site was promoted to me as a Team Skeet Premium site. I have really enjoyed their premium sites and it was a big reason I joined it. Instead, as soon as I joined it said I had access to all of Team Skeet. I'm not including any of that in my review as I believe Dyked is an excellent lesbian site.
Most lesbian sites I have joined are very soft, very lovey, even soft. Dyked takes a different approach. There are scenes with two dominatrix females whipping the teen lesbians into having lesbian sex. There are gym scenes. The almost overdone video game geek girl lesbian scenes. There are scenes with more than 2 girls, hardcore strapon scenes that are rough and a little bit of everything. There's rarely of feeling of love or passion, but there's a feeling of very high lust.
The models are all attractive. They only have 74 scenes, and the update schedule doesn't give me much hope for long term growth. They have 3 updates some months, 0 updates some months and 2 in other months.
The video quality is very good with 1080p, 720p and 576p, 480p and 360p available. The photo sets and screen captures are downloadable and some of those are even better than the videos.
There's a good blend of playful, silly, rough, lots of tribbing/scissoring, and unless you get tired of watching pretty girls naked there's not much to complain about. Believe it or not, as a non-lesbian, I do sometimes get tired of watching pretty girls naked!
The scenes are generally fun and light-hearted, there are stepfamily scenes mixed in too. I would recommend it by itself as a site for those into lesbian scenes that don't follow the typical formula of lesbian scenes so it's a definite recommend with the added Team Skeet network. |
|
01-13-20 11:12pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
42
|
Erotica X
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly polished, glam with a story, porn.
Includes access to 3 other sites, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Very high quality and production quality, reminds me a little of the Met-Art sites.
Cliched stories are better than no stories.
Videos are downloadable in 9 different resolutions, starting with 160p and going up to 4K. Maybe I will ask Santa for a 4K monitor this year? The oldest scenes have up to 1080p.
Updates once a week and has 319 scenes on it. |
| Cons: |
It would seem like pictures would be important to a site like this, but the photo sets are limited in number of photos but they do have downloads (corrected error, missed the button).
I have noticed with these softer "hardcore" sites, sometimes the action just falls very flat. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think I'm still earning my porn rookie badge. I joined this site thinking it was a standalone site. To my surprise, those other 3 sites come with it and as a whole, it's a very good deal.
The content here is like reading an erotica book that your neighbor's wife authored. That's not really a bad thing, maybe she's the next Anais Nin? The stories were a selling point for me, but I probably expected too much.
As an example from the newer scenes. Featuring the gorgeous Vina Sky, her boyfriend broke up with her via text message. She calls her best male friend for a shoulder to cry on and realizes she's been in love with the best friend the whole time. Doesn't that contradict the heartbreak she has? She ended up with the guy she's really in love with.
So, maybe your neighbor's wife isn't the next Anais Nin, after all. It's still better than no story. The scenes are very serious feeling. There's not a lot of feeling of raw emotions or passion. It's not bad, but it just seems a little stale like a two day old doughnut.
There's very little variation in the scenes. Most are male/female, there are some solo and lesbian scenes, but in my opinion, not enough of either of those. I think with this narrow of a niche there should be a near equal balance in solo (fantasizing), lesbian (fantasizing and real), male/female (real). It would add more of a connected feel to the scenes.
The quality of the videos are excellent, but I'm not going to compliment the settings too much. It looks like all these couples and people rented the same hotel room. They must have blew the budget on those stories.
I streamed most of these scenes which isn't the best sign. A few are worth downloading, but most of them started feeling repetitive.
I don't understand why they don't have more pictures. I'm not a picture collector or downloader, but I can usually look at the pictures and combine them with what I see in the video to make more of a connection to the scene.
It's good, what I would call safe porn. It's not going to make you think you're witnessing a revolution in porn, but it's good enough to get off to, a time or two. I do think with the 3 other sites combined as a 4 site network it's a very good deal. I'm going to review the opposite site from their network just to show a completely different experience. |
|
11-04-19 09:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Eternal Desire
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Artistic, solo porn of natural looking models.
Photo update every 3 days, video update every 6 days.
It's believable masturbation porn. I think that's the big selling point.
Videos are explicit in showing the masturbation and the photo sets are also full show of spreads. Both are downloadable.
227 videos, 1,047 photo sets and 212 models.
Easy cancellation, bills through echst.net, but the cancellation process is right in your account. |
| Cons: |
The scenes most likely have an audience for this type of porn, but it's not really that interesting to me.
The scenes are very repetitive.
No purpose, story or reason for these women to be masturbating, it just feels contrived. |
| Bottom Line: |
Give credit to the marketing department. With a name like Eternal Desire it sounds like there might be something really exciting going on. Instead, it's a group of almost all white, young, models masturbating on a bed. It reminds me a little of I Feel Myself without the hotness factor.
The scenes have almost nothing varying between scenes. There is explicit masturbation, but there's a feeling of this is exactly how I used to masturbate when I lived with my parents and didn't want to risk getting caught. I'm not for sure that translates well into porn.
The amount of content is okay with 227 videos and 1,047 photo sets, but those are even on what I'm going to call "the quiet side". If you look at picture 1 then look at the last picture in the set there's very little difference. I need progression in my porn!
The models are pretty enough. Most could easily pass as girl next door types. Which is where I think the videos fail. They could have at least had the girls be more playful, teasing, it's instead like watching a selfish porn scene where the model is just into touching herself and not playing to the camera.
The quality of the videos is good, they have 4K on all videos over the last year or so, before that 1080p was standard and those resolutions go down to small mobile sizes.
I think this sums up my feelings about it. I got most excited for the scenes that had clothed women in the preview. Even if it's just a pair of tights. I keep feeling the word "selfish" when looking at the scenes. I had the same feeling about I Feel Myself. So, that could just me and something I don't like.
The lack of variation in what happens in the scene (masturbation and that's all), no girl/girl scenes, I just can't get into this porn. Most of the models settle into one masturbation position (on knees, on back) and stay there for the whole scene.
The girl next door type models is a plus, but that asks why have them nude to start the scene? The girl next door isn't likely walking around outside in full nudity. At least the quality is high and I think for the right person this site could be a lot better for them than it was me. |
|
12-06-19 09:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Not for sure how much exploitation is going on, but most of these amateur girls wear the guys out in the scenes.
Long, fairly well-thought, enjoyable scenes that let you get to know a little about the model and see if she can perform better than she says. A resounding yes on many of those.
Pretty young women that if nothing else fit the college girl look and even attitude.
Videos have 1080p downloads.
Easy site to use, join and cancel.
Updates 5-6 times per month. |
| Cons: |
Watching the guys try to wear these young college girls out. Sorry Sailor, that boat sunk. You just paid her to do what she does every weekend for free, and she made you look bad while doing it. I’m just having fun, there’s a con in the preconceived notion the site creates with its name. Everyone in these scenes seems to be happy and enjoying every second of the exploitation.
The person that has to change the sheets on the same bed that every scene is filmed in. Ever think of the floor, guys? Bathroom? Balcony? |
| Bottom Line: |
I had to get a little creative with the cons as this site really doesn’t do much wrong. The guys come prepared, are decent enough looking and don’t get in the way. The girls like to talk. They are playful, some are shy and all are horny. It’s how I heard college works. How about a stressed out final exam scene? The excogi shortening of the name makes me think it’s trying to get away from the exploited name and tell us all these girls were in college but dropped out. It’s the ex-college girls. There is no way these young women have time to learn anything other than sex. And taking money from guys. It’s more profitable than a college degree.
Seriously, this site is a pleasant surprise for me and it’s one of those that you do enter with preconceived notions. I was expecting scenes that lasted 22 minutes and 16 seconds. Featured throughout those scenes were the common sex positions and they switched positions every 6 minutes and 23 seconds. I’m saying I was expecting dull, cookie-cutter porn. The girls are not having that. They do not want everyone at the college saying, “She should have stayed in college. She has no career in porn!” She’s making Magna Cum Laude.
Don’t let my inner-author take over or we’ll never get to the review. The scenes do a lot. There is some interview, some teasing, some playfulness, some shyness, some what I see as competitive jostling. You can tell these young women are not going to get wore out by these “old” men. I’m sorry to the guys in the scenes, but you all look old enough to be at least their professors. You can see the societal shift in these young women, in the newer scenes. The scene length is an important factor for me. As a nearing middle-age female, I can’t just get into a scene and have business taken care of in 22 minutes. I need a little time and warming up. These scenes regularly go over one hour and even over 90 minutes for one scene.
I am glad that it’s not 112 minutes of switching positions sex. There is enjoyment in watching how the female’s mind and arousal leads her responses to questions. You can see (or I can as a female) when the young woman is trying to speed things up signaling, she’s warm and ready. I do believe the guys or interviewer could make the scenes a little more interesting by teasing her once she’s aroused and ready. The scenes have an almost “date” like feel to them. Like the guy is trying to talk the young woman into sex. We know she is going to have sex, but if the interviewer could pick up on when the young woman stops thinking about “I’m being paid to do this” and shows the side that just wants to do it whether paid or not, they could have some of the best scenes ever seen.
These young women are extremely horny, and it can be seen. If someone can push those buttons this site would be upper 90s. They come close in some scenes. It may be that I’m asking too much. I thought the Aarora and Leana Threesome was very close to a perfect scene. I doubt that others would think that just by looking at a preview.
I now face the question of how many months would it take me to watch each scene fully? That is what is needed with this content. If you’re skipping much you would probably be better off with another site. It does seem to me you have to watch the entire scene. This is the type of hardcore content porn needs. It’s not dull, it’s not cookie-cutter and everyone seems to enjoy being in it.
The videos can be downloaded up to 1080p. There are pictures, too. They have over 900 scenes and update 5-6 times a month based on the last 3 months. There have around 700 models. I am going to say the number of amateurs is very high if not all. These look like college students not porn models.
I have enjoyed the site a lot and it’s one of those rare ones that I am going back to after I canceled it and planning on staying longer this time. |
|
05-11-22 04:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Family Strokes
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The old dilemma of if you cannot get at least average porn with a great story, go for great porn with a bad story.
High definition porn that you can download
The site is simple to use
Joining and canceling is easy and hassle-free
The pictures are good and can be downloaded
Cute models that fit the theme of the scenes |
| Cons: |
Trying to keep up with all these family trees of cousins, stepsiblings, aunts, uncles, grandfathers and the neverending quest of fauxcest porn
There is a network, Team Skeet offers, that includes Family Strokes, but the price is $50 per month. If you like Family Strokes, just stick to the single site membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
So, I went to a family reunion back in July 2023 and found myself babbling about Family Strokes. The believability of this niche may be important to some people, but I’m not one of them. Let’s keep it as unbelievable as possible just so the thoughts of a Family Strokes scene happening at my family reunion doesn’t enter my brain.
Family Strokes has been around for awhile and I have been a fan of the site since its earliest days. I like the dumbness and lack of an even attempt to make it seem believable. How believable is it that niece Jessica is flirting with her cousin Paul, but her uncle Joe is barbecuing and the one watching her flirtatious ways? When cousin Paul leaves the area to do whatever porn extras do while the sex is happening, Uncle Joe decided it was time to throw a Bratwurst of his own at niece Jessica. Tiny Jessica hopped up on her uncle Joe’s lap and hid his bratwurst in her lady-bun. Out of nowhere, cousin Paul returns and sees what has transpired since he left the camera’s view. Before Paul jumps in and joins his dad in introducing Jessica to the family, grandfather Jacob shows up and realizes he no longer needs ED medication.
Yes, unbelievable, far-fetched, but really funny if you have a sense of humor and more importantly, it’s quite sexy. Porn in 2023 either guides the viewer down a negative path or positive path. It’s rarely noticed, but I notice it with Family Strokes It’s funny, it doesn’t try to convince you those people are really related. It is like showing the mainstream movie, “Spaceballs” to a Star Wars fan.
I prefer being positive and avoiding as much negativity, even if implied or under the guise of “fiction”.
Family Strokes continues to be one of my top sites. I would even like to see more hardcore sites turn to a positive side. The models, most of them, have fun and you can even see the hidden attempts of covering their laughter. The videos are downloadable as are the photo sets and I can say this is one of the few sites, I have downloaded every video from. That is over 3-4 memberships in the last year.
I will mention the Team Skeet network that includes access to Family Strokes, it is called Team Skeet Taboo. I haven’t tried it nor do I intend to. Team Skeet has enough confusing membership options with downloads, stream only, you get this site and that site, but not that site. I just join Family Strokes and enjoy myself and my membership.
One of my favorite sites and that’s not likely going to change. |
|
11-07-23 11:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Family Strokes
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite of the stepfamily sites. It's a Team Skeet premium site and does not include Team Skeet.
They have 246 scenes and add an average of 2 scenes per week. There is no update schedule. They will sometimes release 3-4 scenes in a week then go two weeks with no new updates, but it balances out to 7-8 new scenes per month.
Enjoyable scenes that are funny, sexy and play to a lot of taboo situations.
I have been a member on it twice and kept the membership 3 months each time. My downloading time is limited (thanks, stupid job). By the end of this membership, I will have downloaded every scene.
Doesn't stick to a gender dominant role like many of these taboo sites do. Some scenes are aunts "not really" as they point out, seducing nephews and others are uncles or stepdads seducing nieces and stepdaughters. Isn't even age dominant, as it's sometimes the younger one seducing the older one. |
| Cons: |
These Team Skeet premium sites are almost all excellent, but they don't have model lists that just show the models on that site. It shows all their content on all Team Skeet sites.
The storylines, enjoyable and fun, can be more unbelievable than the fake family angles. |
| Bottom Line: |
The taboo this site creates is not as high as many stepfamily sites. Most of the actors and actresses would be more believable if they didn't have scripted actions and words. There is one where the stepfather walks into a room his stepdaughter is in. He's holding his towel on with his erection. The stepdaughter giggles and says, "Nice towel rack". If you're missing the humor there, she's not even bothered that her stepfather walked into her bedroom with an erection.
You get the cliched lines like, "Is that for me?" and my favorite, when the erect dick shows itself and the daughter, niece, aunt, stepmom jumps back like she has no idea what it is. I am put off by rough and violent porn so this silly, cliched and funny porn is a much more welcome style for me.
You won't likely have a complaint about any of the models looks, bodies or action. These models on the Team Skeet premium sites seem to be the top-level of their models, the scenes are long and even though 246 scenes isn't a lot, it is for this type or premium content and these sites are relatively inexpensive.
A few examples of what to expect from the scenes here: My Stepdaughter the Escort, the stepfather hires an escort, meets her at the hotel and surprise, it's his stepdaughter. Under the Table Footplay, as the stepdaughter plays footsie with her stepdad's dick under the kitchen table while the mom is sitting there. On that one, they could make it so serious that it could be believable, but instead they have the stepdaughter smiling and twirling her hair while staring at the stepfather and ignoring her mom.
They also do parodies. I think it's one of their most popular scenes and it was just released a few weeks ago of The Addams Family, with the whole main cast of the old television show/movies getting in on a family orgy. They have a Family Guy scene that features the human look-a-like cast members of the popular animated show having an orgy.
The scenes all clock in at around or over 30 minutes each. There are photos and screencaps for each scene along with the video and all are downloadable. These premium sites have one distinct advantage and that is the navigation. Everything is easy to find.
The only people I wouldn't recommend the site to are those that need a believable stepfamily story. These are fantasy scenes. The lowest rated scenes on the site are the ones where they have tried to go more serious. Those are in the 70-80% liked range, while the silly, playful ones are almost all over 90% liked.
Very enjoyable site and one I will continue to come back to every 6 months. |
|
11-18-19 11:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Every angle of massage porn is covered on the 7 “channels” or “sites” in this network.
Currently has 2,265 scenes across the network and updates 6-7 times per month.
Scenes are longer than average and it’s because of the massage part.
Based on the tags just about everything is covered from ball licking to pussy licking.
Last few years downloadable videos have 4K.
Pretty models, but the uniforms are kind of annoying for me. |
| Cons: |
Either have to pay extra, luck into a promo or join for a year to get downloads.
Some of the sites are not updating. It is only a problem based on the sites representing different niches in the massage genre. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start with a listing of the 7 different sites/channels with the scene number in parenthesis: Nuru Massage (674), All Girl Massage (638), Massage Parlor (314), Soapy Massage (241), Fantasy Massage (183), Milking Table (112) and Tricky Spa (103). These are the ones still updating: All Girl Massage and Nuru Massage. That does cause a problem with the niches and video download quality. Three of the sites have not been updated since 2019: Tricky Spa, Soapy Massage, Milking Table and Massage Parlor. Those each represented different niches and none of those have 4K scenes.
Though it is not listed as one of the sites/channels, they do have Family Sex Massage as well. It also isn’t updating and is grouped into the Fantasy Massage site. It does seem like they were trying to do too many different niches and just started giving up on all of them. There is good news on the download quality, other than the oldest scenes, most have at least 720p and 1080p. The bad news for me is the oldest scenes are from Soapy Massage and I really like that one. Some of those only have 480p as the highest download option.
The update schedule is good with 6-7 updates per month, but we run into a new conundrum. Since Nuru and All Girl Massage are the only sites updating, Nuru chooses to start the females in a uniform (hospital-type scrubs) and it looks like the same room and location. What probably wouldn’t be that noticeable, becomes noticeable since every other update is from Nuru Message. It’s one of the things I noticed. Soapy Massage is more of a handjob-type site and that niche is a favorite of mine. But it hasn’t updated in many years. They should try something new that brings in the niches they are no longer producing any scenes of. I don’t think they realized or cared to notice they eliminated their own variance. It makes the newer scenes seem repetitive.
The models are pretty. The male models, this made me laugh a little. The first hardcore porn I remember seeing had Evan Stone in it. He is in one of the scenes that was just released 3 months ago. He is nearing 60. It is one of the examples of them trying some story. It seems Evan is Gia Derza’s landlord. It is a very good scene once I got over the shock of seeing a man that I remember seeing in a porn scene from 2002. There’s not a lot of story in the scenes. I do think that hurts this genre. Is everyone just signing up for massages? At least that one, had Evan coming to collect the rent, it turned Gia giving him a massage. That is also the problem with the uniforms.
The site or network is better than I may be making it sound. One thing I really like about these scenes is there are different types of cumshots. There are facials, swallowing and on the body. That is maybe a female thing. I like seeing the different types of cumming and don’t dislike any. I do like that they do the different types. As I scan through putting the final touches on this review, I can’t help but notice there are even scenes on All Girl Massage with the uniform on one of the females. I get that they are going for authentic, but when the scenes don’t do much to stand out from the pack, then you add the same uniforms, it does become repetitive. My score shows that I do like it. They just need to add more depth. I do like the use of the massage oils. It makes the sex look messier. One of the tags caught my attention. I don’t think I have seen it before. That is Body Sliding with 561 scenes featuring body sliding. Also in the tags, is one that I think is worth pointing out, only 1,594 of the 2,265 scenes have the “Massage” tag. I think they have a non-porn definition of massage. I haven’t seen a scene on here without massaging of some kind. |
|
03-08-22 05:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
48
|
Femjoy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a good collection of videos too.
Currently has 1,622 models
9,036 photo sets and 755 videos.
The videos are better than I expected them to be, while there's no full masturbation, there is light masturbation and full views of the models bodies.
Averages a photo update each day and a video update once per week. |
| Cons: |
Music in videos takes away the moaning -- if there is any moaning.
Site layout seems to have been changed. There is a button to go back to the old website style. The new or current style isn't real good to use with Edge Beta browser as the streaming player's function buttons are covered by the videographer's name and you click it when trying to fast forward, taking you to the videographer's page and stopping your video. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to review Joymii and Femjoy at the same time as I got the sites confused, having a Adult Time account makes it more confusing since both are on Adult Time now in very limited sample sizes. I joined both Femjoy and Joymii as standalone sites not with Adult Time access.
I'm not a big picture collector, but this is my second time on Femjoy and I really like their photos. Their biggest size is 6000x4000 or vice versa and they are incredibly crisp photos for that large resolution.
The models are your regular European teen models, you do see some variety in body shapes and sizes, but in general, these are slim or slender models and they are nearly all very pretty. The videos are better than most artsy sites and they do show full pussy spreads and buttholes. You even get some rubbing, light touching and that helps keep this site's content out of the too softcore grouping.
There is nothing close to a balance of videos and photos as the photos near 10,000 sets while the videos haven't even reached 1,000. All are downloadable and there's no limits from as far as I can tell.
It's a good site, I like it better than Joymii which I believe is probably ran by the same company and if not they are very similar. I prefer these solo scenes when on the softer side of porn.
The video options are 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p, 270p. Their content dates all the way back to 2005. There are some models here with tattoos, but they are minimal and don't distract.
I do think if you are interested in this site it should be more for the photos than videos, even though I recommend streaming a few of the videos. I think they could be seen as fetish videos with the pretty women naked, touching themselves lightly, their natural arousal and positioning causing their pussies to open, but then again, I could see just about anyone saying the videos are too softcore.
A few site layout issues aside, it's a very good site overall and should make any photo collector happy. The photo sets are often more explicit than the videos. |
|
11-26-19 12:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very good site that shows one fetish leads to another then another.
The female models are very attractive and were my initial interest in the site. The guys are pretty good, too, including some I have heard of which is unusual for me.
662 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Videos and photos and downloadable. Videos up to 4K.
Nice, sexy, sensual feeling to the scenes.
Most scenes are long at least 30 minutes. |
| Cons: |
The older scenes do not have the high-quality videos or photos.
The name could hurt the site, it’s a lot more than foot fetish. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t really have any set fetishes I adhere to. I just like fetishes. The flow of fetishes usually finds at least one or two I like in each scene. The foot fetish is not one I’m very familiar with as far as in practice of. I don’t see me offering to give a guy a footjob. Most of the scenes get that action in each scene, but that leads to that flow I talked about. There are blowjobs, vaginal, anal, and that is for me, a good, broad-reaching fetish site. It had its basis fetish with foot but doesn’t stay there. That could be a con for some.
The size of the site is a bonus. Unless you have a problem with lower video quality. The oldest scenes are from 2005 and those only have up to 540p downloads. One thing I want to mention is the high quality of not only the newer scenes videos, but also of the picture sets. As someone that started my interest in online porn through Nubiles, I am used to having high quality videos and photo sets. This site’s photo sets have 150-200 photos in each. The photos sets can be downloaded in zips and the newer ones have photos that are 6700x4200 resolution and crystal clear besides the occasional blurry out of focus shot. The newer videos have all the download resolutions from 160p to 4K. There is a glamourous feeling to this site, and I believe the sensual nature of the foot fetish makes that happen.
The scenes are lacking in the story department, but it’s not hard to create stories in your head for these scenes. You have to think if a woman is willing to wrap her feet around a guy’s dick, that’s the story! It is the secretive advantage of fetish content. The males and female seem to really be into this fetish.
I really like this site and am surprised I am just now discovering it. I may have to look more into this foot fetish content. It seems it sets a softer, gentler tone to the scenes. Maybe it’s because the women are in more control, even? That is not to say this is softcore. Some of these scenes are as hardcore as the anal-fetish sites are. Even at that, some of the scenes, around 70, have anal in them. This fetish is being used properly and well. It’s giving me a reason to believe these actors and actresses are so turned on by exploring their foot fetish, it is lowering their inhibitions towards other fetishes. Not being a fetishist, but knowing fetishists, that does seem to be the real-life appeal of fetishes. The models are also a major bonus. I would recommend the site without hesitation. It covers nearly all major niches thanks to starting each scene with something as unattractive and useless (except for walking) foot. Very enjoyable and entertaining site with impressive quality. |
|
02-09-22 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Phew – that’s a lot of hot and sexy content!
Stunning downloadable videos
High quality throughout along with lots of goodies
Navigation works effortlessly and accurately
Photos are as high of quality as I have seen
Models are real, girl next door types and are all sexy |
| Cons: |
They are likely their own biggest competition and that never turns out well. You either top your previous work and make it lesser or you fail to top it and make your current work lesser.
The split videos |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls was “hardcore” to me back when I started perusing online porn. There are scenes with men with women and lesbian scenes too, but FTV’s strength is in the solo niche It surprises me how many times I have read someone complain about the site being named FTV which stands for First Time Video. There is little to no doubt that most of these models are filming their first ever porn scene. What I think happened, FTV carries a connotation of innocence and youth. FTV has one of the broadest age ranges for what is often advertised as a teen site. The Teen genre has stuck around so long that FTV now has a MILF site.
The girls next door style of models has been a forever strength of mainstream porn. That’s also a belief around FTV (all amateur, not true). There are some major porn stars on FTV.
The navigation cannot be praised enough. This is a massive collection, but you shouldn’t have any problems navigating the network.
This is what a typical scene wants to do and have you experience. A model meets up with the photographer. She takes pictures and does an interview style video where she answers some unique questions. She then works on her teasing ability and posing as well. That ultimately leads to the model masturbating. It’s beyond believable. A young woman teasing others and showing her body off suddenly decides to masturbate.
That is made better by the various toys FTV brings to the set. You’re going to see fingers and fists and multiple toys. All of which make guys wish they were the object or toy and makes women like myself, wonder why we didn’t try being with women.
FTV has taught me I do prefer simpler porn. These videos are based on a young woman doing something she most likely tried as her first sexual activity. The technical points of the site are easy to look over. The videos show a different woman (often less shy). I do believe that is one weakness of FTV. I do believe we as viewers fall into a mindset of what we think young, first time models do to themselves. Which in turn is a major strength.
On top of all the positives from above: The photos and videos are unlimited downloads. There’s so many examples of actions we would see as important to a successful porn site and those are right.
An easy 95 that could easily move up to 100. |
|
05-10-23 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
|
