Females are mostly young, but there are chubbier models, slimmer models and various races.
Cons:
The other reviews I've read said they are recycling content. I didn't know what that meant. I'm not for sure they are. One of the newest scenes is of Allie Addison. I saw her on ALS Scan and they were saying it's her first year in porn. Some might be recycled or they may have removed some, but for this niche this is a lot of content.
I was frustrated with Rocketgate which caused the problem I had to contact the site's customer service about.
Bottom Line:
This is your standard handjob site, but there is a lot more going on here. Some of the models get on top of the guy and tease their vagina against the male's penis. Some slide the guy's penis up and down between their butt cheeks. Others stick the penis between their boobs and some turn into oral and oral teasing.
The more advanced scenes seem to be over the last 3-4 years. Maybe people/fans complained that the handjob action was getting repetitive. The different types of scenes really makes this site excellent.
The models are all in the better looking to very pretty group. That is not common in this niche.
The sites that come with blend in too. Mr. POV is POV sex, if you get tired of watching handjobs you can watch sex from the perspective of the camera. The other is The Dick Suckers. It's a lot like Mano Job except you're going to see oral in every scene. The sites combined have around 1,400 scenes total.
I like it a lot. There is a good amount of focus on the man and his enjoyment. The models all look to be having fun and the scenes with more than just a handjob are better than hardcore sex scenes for me.
The download options are unique. You can download on 1080p, 720p, Web Version, Mobile Version, Cumshot only or Exclusive Interview. You can also stream another option -- the slo-mo cumshot. You can make a playlist with your favorite scenes in it so they play in a row. You can favorite your favorite models.
The site is simple to use. It has a dropdown box to change the site you are viewing. The model index can be viewed in alphabetical order and when you click on a model it shows you all of her scenes on each of their sites.
The models are usually in skimpy clothing, but some wear regular looking outfits, some are topless in the scenes, some are fully nude, it kind of is the pattern on this site. They are covering a lot of bases.
They do tag most of their scenes as J.O.E. sometimes tagged on other sites as J.O.I. J.O.E is jerk off encouragement. I haven't seen any scenes with insults from the women. That is a plus for me. I like to see both people enjoying themselves not one belittling the other.
This will go into my very short list of favorite sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A variation of solo-based sites with some extreme insertions, outdoor scenes and cute girls.
Some of the models make me feel old, but that is okay. The models on this site are slim, few maybe none have implants and they do seem to enjoy themselves.
The site has improved by leaps and bounds in how it works. I was a member here many years ago. It used to be hard to find anything. It now is one of the simplest sites to use.
Most of the models have more than one scene or photoset. There are 424 models total with nearly 3,000 videos and over 3,000 photosets. I like when a site does this instead of having a new model in every scene.
The impromptu lesbian scenes are my favorite lesbian scenes I have seen.
Cons:
The sign-up and entrance as a new member could be easier. You have a whole page of other sites the Met-Art network offers to pick as add-on sites. There is a link to bypass it, but it is one line of text compared to 8 or more large photos for the other sites.
The staff selection picks are on here just like on Sex Art and they are the same scenes. You have to pay extra for those.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined ALS Scan, I thought ALS was the name of the producer of the content. ALS means All Ladies Shaved.
The content is mostly solo. My favorite scenes on here are the ones with more than one person, but the other person or multiple people are not fully interacting. Those scenes give you the feeling the model just decided to masturbate even with clothed people sitting around her. It is a very basic idea, but it is not basic once it enters the viewer's mind.
I even watch the behind the scenes -- scenes. Unlike most behind the scenes videos, ALS shows every step of their filming. There are many that show the assistant (female) touching the model a little more than needed. It gives more of a look into the model's personality and even shows how much she likes being touched even if not in a porn scene.
I would guess the producer added those behind the scenes videos with extra touching with the plan of one day having a behind the scenes video to turn into a full blown porn scene. If they did not plan that they probably claim they did since it does happen.
There's something different about seeing an assistant ask if she can kiss the model that adds a lot to all of their scenes. It makes me wonder how much of this extracurricular activity goes on in all porn. My thinking is not often. You can see and feel that the ALS models are giving genuine, horny performances. I want to apply for the head baby oil applier! ALS might not even realize the female fantasy they are creating for women viewers. I know I would be a lot more likely to rub baby oil all over a cute, nude woman than jumping right into a lesbian scene.
I am not usually a person that views pictures or downloads them, but one of my very first internet searches for porn -- about 15 years ago, brought up a photo set from ALS Scan. They have some of the most natural and unaltered photos. Their outdoor photosets are life-like. You can download the photosets in zip files.
The videos can be as simple as a woman masturbating on the bed to masturbating by the pool. They use various items including those from gynecology and what I consider extreme dildos, but those are not as common here as on sites labeled as extreme penetration. You will also see some fisting. It does not appeal to me, but like the extreme dildos, it is not that common.
The videos can be downloaded from 270p up to 4K. I tried to get a count on the amount of 4K videos, but received a page that said, "Page not found". The option to see only 4K videos seems to be broken or missing. In my browsing, I have seen 4K labeled videos back as far as 2015. The quality of their videos is very good.
My favorite scenes are the impromptu lesbian scenes, the casting scenes and the ones with the non-participating clothed people visible. I don't like feeling like the only one watching the model.
A month is never enough. I usually join it for 3 months at a time. Their streaming player is one of the better ones I have used. I stream the behind the scenes ones to check for any extra action in them. I would recommend it to anyone looking for fun, believable solo scenes with added bonuses of lesbian and even a few group scenes. I have no comment on the male with female scenes. There are not many of them. I haven't watched any of them. Those seem out of place on this site.
Production values are above average unless you consider story part of the production values.
There are 4K downloads over the last year and 1080p prior to those.
I have not seen a tattoo or a set of implants on the site.
917 scenes, but they haven't updated since January 2019.
Cons:
This type of porn is very dull and plain to me.
The scene titles make you believe there is a story going on, but if there is it is well-hidden.
Now that Adult Time has taken over there is no way to search just for models on 21 Natural. If you go to a model's page it shows you all of her content on all of the Adult Time sites.
Bottom Line:
This site reminds me of Sex Art. The models are very attractive. The settings are nice and fit the modern vibe of the content. That seems to be where they stopped.
Sites like these are hard to review and hard to be too critical of or too enthusiastic about. They do a good job of sticking to their naturals theme, but the scenes lack everything except sex. Maybe they were going for natural equals no stories -- just sex?
I'm not for sure how hard it is to find someone to write a little story with dialogue? The stories seem to be based on that is a man, that is a woman, they are horny, watch them have sex.
The quality of camerawork, lighting and person that opens the window to let natural wind in are all very high and consistent. The closest they come to a story are in the 21 Foot Art scenes.
They have 917 scenes, but their updates seemed to just stop for no reason. Between December 1st, 2018 and the first week of January 2019, they had 16 scenes, then those updates stopped.
You can download in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes of the last year have 4K or 2160p. The streaming video is 720p at least to my monitor that is what it looks like.
They have picture sets for download.
It feels like they are getting everything right except the content. The positions even look the same from scene to scene as is the order of the sexual positions. It is why I felt the foot scenes added to the content. It at least breaks the monotony of following a set order of positions.
For me, between this site, Sex Art and X-Art, I have realized porn is not supposed to be romantic. Scenes like these strengthen the theories about sex being lust. There is little feeling of lust in the scenes. I will try to avoid scenes like these from now on. That is a subjective opinion. If you already know you like this type of porn then you will probably like this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation.
Male and female models are very attractive.
The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand.
Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos.
The site updates each day.
Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost.
Cons:
Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in.
I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one.
Bottom Line:
I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that.
It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it.
A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn.
The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other.
The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into.
They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money.
I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates.
It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off.
The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes.
These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions."
That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too.
Your reply is one of the points I was making. I think porn directors are missing out on an entire audience. I know at least a couple of men that enjoy masturbating for women. I know it would be popular with straight women. I think gay men would like it from the voyeuristic side of watching a straight man masturbate for a straight woman. Porn tries so hard to make everything blatantly obvious and I think it is where porn is starting to fail. If it's supposed to be for gay enjoyment no one else is going to enjoy it that much. The same with straight sex. A gay man would need a lot of imagination to watch a man and woman have vaginal intercourse and see himself as the woman but a gay man could fantasize being the woman watching the straight man masturbate. I always thought straight men would have trouble with lesbian porn. There are no penises so what role do they see themselves in? Porn has to figure out that the world and sexuality has changed a lot over the last 10-15 years. Porn hasn't changed a lot.
Maybe I am a little ahead of myself. My reply to LKLK linked to a site named Straight Guys! There are numerous reports coming out about women's use of porn. The percentages are still favoring the men 70% to 30%, however, women spend more time watching porn per day than men do. As money hungry as the porn industry is it seems like they would be trying to get in on the new audience. The sites I have seen for women are like the lovecore sites for men. It could be my own past of being a sexual recluse, but I do not know any woman that fantasizes about having regular sex. I don't like to discuss patients, but I can vaguely make a blanket statement that the regular sex is a big part of marital problems that I hear about. I don't know when it became more normal for women to masturbate for their boyfriend or husband, but I do think there is an obvious connection to porn. Maybe the boyfriend or husband likes watching women masturbate in porn? The wife or girlfriend wants him to be as into her and the woman in the porn.
I look at it that way. If porn makes it more normal for men to masturbate in front of women there would be something new for couples to improve their sex life with. I also think where using gay or even just smaller, thinner men, it does not strike the female's sexual instincts. Some (one on here on PU) high level psychologists believe we have created fantasies that only make us happy inside. That would not trigger as must lust as a fantasy should. Women, in my experience, have way more sexual triggers than men do. It just seems there is a large amount of content just waiting to be made. I do know some men are more aroused by watching their girlfriend or wife watching porn that turns her on more than watching porn aimed at the man. If only I had the money to start such a network! I will check the thread out.
No one really knows how limited the appeal is. The estimations have 30% of porn viewers being women. The two most searched porn sites by women are "Lesbians" and "Gay Porn". There is not a category in porn for "Straight men solo" or "Men masturbating for women". If females made up a smaller group than 30% it would make sense not to try it, but considering there are sites focused on women using enemas, I do not believe that has the market potential of "straight men solo".
Like in the comparison you started with. Is it normal, in real life, for women to go up and masturbate in front of men? There are over 2,000 sites with women masturbating in full scenes on them. Even if the solo men category was based on percentages, that would mean there should be at least 500 solo men sites. I'm not one of the women that hates all porn or thinks the porn industry is unfair. I just believe until someone takes a chance and gives porn aimed at straight women a chance there is an entire market being left untouched. I can't say this for sure, but I believe gay men would also enjoy seeing straight men masturbating.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique site included in a network of CFNM (Clothed Female Nude Male) sites.
This one focuses on women watching men masturbate. The women do not always stay clothed, but by having some of the women taking their clothes off it doubles the chances of seeing something new from scene to scene.
When I think of "porn for women" this site is what I think of.
Unlike other sites of this type and in the CFNM genre, there is very little belittling of the men which is much more realistic to me. I do not know many women that would make fun of a man's size if he was masturbating over her body.
The included network access has 5 more sites in it and a total of 1,300 scenes. This site has 226 scenes.
There are downloadable photos and screencaps to go along with the videos.
Finishing the pros with it is one of the few sites I know of with believable straight solo men for women's enjoyment.
Cons:
It is a narrow niche. I am not for sure if straight men would enjoy it since it is a man masturbating. I am not for sure if gay men would enjoy since there are women in the scenes.
The network's navigation can impede the individual sites. Clicking videos on Lady Voyeurs takes you to all the videos on the whole network. It can be worked around, but even knowing it, I still make the mistake.
Bottom Line:
Along with a couple of my female friends I have looked for sites with men masturbating. There are some in the gay genre. Some of those are good. Some of those are clearly not directed at women. This is a niche the female produced sites are not interested in filming. I view porn as a precursor to fantasy. If I see it in a video, the next fantasy entering my mind will be whatever was in the video.
I do not know the percentage of guys willing to masturbate in front of woman in real life (not on a webcam or on Facetime), but I want to say it is low. So much hardcore porn has the guy pulling out and masturbating for 20 seconds to cum. Why not have scenes where men see a woman and can't stop themselves from masturbating right in front of her? In the right hands (it was kind of intended), this niche could be the one that breaks porn's hold on porn for "man's enjoyment" and gives women something to fantasize about and enjoy.
As porn currently is, us females get to choose between watching the same hardcore porn intended for male's enjoyment, two cute college girls doing what we are sure did not really happen when we were in college or porn intended for gay men to enjoy.
Lady Voyeurs helps change that, but it could be better.
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman.
It is a regular feeling I have when watching porn. There is so much more they could do. My score shows I do like this site a lot. I just wonder how much of it is because there are not many sites with this niche?
The minimal demeaning and belittlement also scores points for this site. They have a newer scene with the belittling. I do not know why. They have a another site on the network called, "Hey, Little Dick" shouldn't the scene titled, "It's so small" be on that site? Porn is in a quandary. We do not have to abuse and hate men to make porn for women. If a man was brave enough to masturbate in front of woman, and her response was "It's so small" does that not continue to lower the image of women? Tasteless is the word.
Stick with the pretty models being turned on by the brave to-fro-to-fro-to-fro man. Teasing him and even telling him what she wants him to do besides to-fro.
I would not rate the network any higher than this site. One of the other sites was named earlier, "Hey, Little Dick", another is "Girls Abuse Guys", the big site on the network "Pure CFNM" is good, but the themes are inconsistent, the site "CFNM Games" is on the network too and it goes between eye-rolling bad scenes to good scenes. Really, "Hey guy, lay down with your boner pointing up, we are going to compete by throwing hoops at your boner!" The poor guy must not have had sex in years to be talked into that.
I think it is important to point out these dumb/bad/belittling scenes because it is where you see the female models inability to act. A few look like they enjoy tormenting the guy, but most look uncomfortable or like they are auditioning for a B-grade horror movie.
That is why Lady Voyeurs scores an 88 and it would be my score for the network. The Lady Voyeurs scenes with the woman watching, being turned on, taking her clothes off, masturbating too are very believable and rely on zero acting ability. Could it be called "Instinctual Porn"?
The video quality is good, you can download 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not like their streaming player. It crashes my browser 1 out of 3 times I try to use it. I usually will skim-stream a scene to see if it is worth a download. The amount of models on the network is around 600. They have a variety of size, race and attitudes in both male and female models.
It is a good value if you are looking for this type of content. There is not a lot of it out there.
I am glad you found my review helpful. I tried to focus on the parts I believe Nubiles.net does better at than the Nubiles Porn network. Most reviews I see of Nubiles are more focused on the network.
Thank you, I have read a lot of reviews here and hope it shows. I do not like admitting it, but I can be closeminded in the genres I like. I am trying to expand my breadth of interest in porn. I enjoy all naked parts. I just do not like some of the actions once naked lol!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site is in its 16th year of operation. There are 2,213 models. One is as cute as the next.
Innocence lost before your eyes. My favorite part of this site are the shy and sweet models.
Minimal tattoos, implants or other body modifications.
Non-extreme masturbation.
Video quality is superb, but I wish the photo sets were more vivid in colors.
I have been an on-again, off-again member for 10 years. I like that they have not made any drastic changes.
Cons:
It would not hurt to have more body types. Just because they are barely legal teens does not mean they have to all be slim.
More outdoor sets would be a welcome change.
Maybe have some of the willing models to go more extreme with their masturbation
Bottom Line:
Nubiles.net was the first porn site I joined. I sign up for 3 months each year. This is my 10th year.
It first captured my attention with its name. A former employer was said to hire only "nubile employees". As a former sex recluse the innocence of the models, their shyness and the non-extreme masturbation kept me around as a member.
I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman or relationship with a woman, but I would consider it with some of the models on Nubiles. It is non-intimidating pornography. I would not group it with sites like Met-Art, but it is closer to Met-Art than a hardcore site.
My only disappointment with the site is the inclusion of hardcore content. The hardcore scenes are not like hardcore porn we usually see, but why even risk losing your established niche?
I think with the site now operating as part of the Nubiles Porn network they should only have solo scenes on Nubiles.net.
The site updates as much as entire networks. There are 2 photo set updates per day and 2 videos per day. If you catch a sale price you can have access to the whole network for around $10-$15.
The models are almost all slender. I would like to see chubby, shy, innocent models too. I have noticed sites like to create an image of what fits a type of model. They do get stuck on trying to stay within the image.
The video quality only needs work if you require 4K. I consider their videos some of the crispest and highest quality available. My complaint about the picture colors is splitting hairs. I prefer warm colors in photos. I am sure others prefer cooler colors like Nubiles uses. Most do not know the difference!
The site offers more than 13,000 video or photo sets. The videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. The photos can be downloaded in zip files.
The models range from amateurs you will not see anywhere else to early-career pros. There is a focus on natural. Tattoos have become more common in recent years, but are not required like some sites. Implants are not common; neither is too much make-up or formal clothing.
I believe it is one of the best values in pay porn. You also receive access to Nubiles Porn. A network including various niches. I would join Nubiles.net with or without the network access.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
