Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : KayTBuffs (0)

Feedback:   All (171)  |   Reviews (153)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (18) Other:   Replies Received (48)  |   Trust Ratings (0) All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user. Shown : 151-175 of 187 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 151 Silverstone DVD (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Some really great classic DVD scenes. Nostalgia is replacing my interest in newer porn. So many of these models are ones I forgot about. Very large site with 1,203 scenes. It should appeal to collectors and those that started watching porn in the earlier years of internet porn. You get Adult Time with it. There’s plenty more porn to look at. Captures more of the spirit of porn that first interested me in porn. Cons: The video quality is not good. It looks like these scenes are all from SD DVDs, 480p is the top option for downloads. I still think nostalgia and the action makes up for it. It stopped updating in 2019 but was updating regularly and I don’t know why they didn’t improve the quality. Bottom Line: Start it off with blame Vivid Classics for taking me back to a simpler time in porn’s history. Who needs gimmicks, domination and fetishes when you can have two very pretty, young, European women using a strap-on with each other? I was expecting the scenes to be in better quality. The Vivid Classics are and it on the same network. I can see the age of these scenes. There’s one with a young Silvia Saint. The ones I remembered are the Girl on Girl scenes. Some of the models look like maybe South American amateurs. Those are very good scenes. I can get by the video quality if the scene is good enough. I do remember being a member of Silverstone DVD as a standalone site around 2010. I started out with Nubiles and DVD porn was very popular at the time. I would join the different studio sites instead of trying to punish myself with the large DVD sites. I do remember how much I liked these scenes. I thought the studio was long gone. I didn’t even realize it’s on Adult Time. You get 1,203 scenes. The lesbian scenes are the best ones on the site. One of the first female pornstars I felt attraction to, which scared me – was Dee Baker. She has some scenes on this site including the one I remember well with Jeanie Rivers. This porn is as “dirty” as the porn we are seeing more of these days. Dee rims Jeanie, much more passionate lesbian scenes than the newer scenes have on most site. I don’t know what it says for me when I say I’m not a lesbian, but I really like passionate lesbian porn. It’s not all lesbian. There are straight scenes. Over 500 anal scenes. Most of the performers are well-known porn greats. It's probably not going to blow you away, but if you like younger women, the smaller, slimmer women like were more common 10 years ago in porn, you will find some scenes on this site that you like. One DVD that I remember so well from this site, the Twins Collection that has the looks to be real twins. The two young, very pretty black twins. That is a niche I remember porn trying to get going about 10-15 years ago. Those DVDs are on here. Those show me something as well. If you like black women and South American women, there are a lot on this site. I know that guys have complained about not enough diversity in models. I nearly downloaded as much from this site as I did Vivid. I’ve still not hit that download limit, but these scenes, being 480p are not very big. Most are around 200 MB each. Where does nostalgia fit in to today’s world? I like it. The people look like they are having fun. And having orgasms, the women are cute, the guys are masculine. I think everyone should at least watch a scene or two from it just to see the differences between new porn and the classic porn. Half of these scenes have anal, but none of those are hard to watch. That tells me it’s a difference in how the models act. Both male and female. This is equal porn. Most of these men stay out of the camera except the important, needed part. Their enjoyment and pleasure seem to come from how attractive the females are. That’s a lost concept in porn today. Not much reason to check the site anymore after this time, but plenty of reason to if you haven’t. It also shows what porn snobs we have become. We will watch low entertainment value porn in exchange for 2180 pixel videos. 02-09-22  06:28am Replies (0) Review 152 Sinful Raw (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: An interesting, episodic porn site that is in its very early stages. The scenes are very professional with high production values. All videos include a 4K download option, but there are currently only 16 scenes. It’s updating twice a week and will say the scenes are long enough and good enough to at least show the potential this site has. There are downloadable photo zips as well those should not overlooked. The resolution is 2700x4000 and there are excellent lighting effects that show up more in the photos than in the videos. The scenes have added elements of added kink to them, like cloth masks, orgies and I’m going to say what the site reminds me of – Pure Taboo. Cons: I believe a person could get confused with the titling of the scenes. There’s part 1, part 2, part 3 of each titled scene. I don’t know a lot of pro models, but know most of these. This is the downside to a professional site. There are models, especially males, that I remember seeing in porn over 15 years ago like Erik Everhard. Bottom Line: This site has a lot of potential. Whether they reach that potential is going to be questionable. The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The photos can be downloaded and are 2700x4000 resolution. The photos are some of the best I have seen and it’s because the scenes all have a dark feel to them. The photos use lighting to highlight the areas you want to see. It feels like the site is produced by someone who has a lot of experience watching good porn and they’re trying to follow in those footsteps. It does lead to some problems. I have very little experience with porn before 2010, especially hardcore porn, but I recognize these actors/models. One scene is Barbie Sins and Erik Everhard. I know I have seen scenes with Erik Everhard in scenes from the late 1990s. I’m not saying there’s a problem with that, but I have learned in my time watching porn that the longtime pros just don’t appeal that much to me. Since this is episodic porn (that’s what happens when you use the same title and put an ascending number after each scene), I can say I don’t see much connection between the scenes of the same title. There is Dirty Thirty, Dirty Thirty 2 and Dirty Thirty 3. The first one is a professional businesswoman who is out of town on business and seduces the bellhop at the hotel while talking to her husband on the phone. Dirty Thirty 2 is a professional businesswoman who hires a male prostitute (Erik Everhard) to do for her what her husband can’t. Part 3 is similar in theme, the woman plays the role of an escort finder (pimp?) and brings in her top male performer to satisfy a woman and he does so in less time than the woman paid for, so the female pimp has sex with him too. There are some interesting takes on the ways these scenes play out including a 3 part called Mine For A Moment. They even have one 3 part series titled Rock, Paper, Scissors. The newest series they have is listed as the First Sinful Orgy. This is where you see the positive of professional work. There are 9 people in one of those orgy scenes and you can see all 9 of them at various points in the video. The size of the site with only two updates per month definitely doesn’t help, but depending on the viewer, I believe they will either love these scenes or not even be interested. There are tattoos, implants and I do think that comes from the professional part of the site. These are mostly well-known porn stars maybe taking a different approach to their porn. There is another part to like and not to like. Nearly all of the scenes are 27-30 minutes long. That’s the professional part again. I do understand, as an author myself, plot, crescendo and ending are all important and need to be timed perfectly. That’s in a book. I don’t know if it translates as well in video, especially porn. I’m going to say something I rarely say and that is I don’t find most of these women very attractive. I know others do. I recognize nearly every name, but we are going into subjective preferences. The orgy scene which has made up the 4 newest scenes does give me the feeling of potential. Maybe they started out with known pros they knew they could count on to give consistent performances to show the developing story and plot in the scenes. That does make me believe it has potential. My personal advice would be to pull away from those veterans of porn and put some newer talent in the scenes. It reminds me of when I watch another Will Smith movie. He’s a great actor and has a great personality, but it’s another Will Smith movie. The 4 scenes of the orgy has a lot of females and males I’m not THAT familiar with. I recognize a few, but most are new to me. There is a lot of playing on the emotions of cheating, betraying, even a little cuckolding. I like it and will keep checking back on it. I believe they’re on the right track. 10-19-21  01:22pm Replies (0) Review 153 Slayed (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Erotic lesbian porn that’s not as nice as typical lesbian porn Videos can be downloaded and all scenes have up to 4K downloads Can be combined into a 7 site package deal for a good price. Pretty and sexy models Scenes are fun and have good production Updates weekly Cons: There is a download limit, but as of right now, the small size of the site makes the limit not a problem. The small size of the site makes it questionable in value, but if you buy the 7 site bundle, the deal is a lot better. Bottom Line: I joined the 7 site bundle and will just fil-in what is included with it. Besides Slayed, you also get Deeper, Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. The studio that owns this group of sites – Mad Cheddar – believes in several things. To start with, all their sites have the 25 downloads per week download limit. All their sites feature high production values and well, that’s not always a good thing. The bundle of sites does offer a broad range of genres and fetishes. The price for the 7 site bundle is $49.95. Slayed Is the newest of the Mad Cheddar sites and it is the only lesbian Mad Cheddar site. I’m going to say it’s not the best lesbian site I have joined, but it is a lot better than the lesbian sites you receive with the average porn network. It is a little kinkier and more hardcore than the sensual lesbian sites, but it still has high sensuality. I would like to see more group scenes, but this studio doesn’t do much with groups. The models are all very pretty and sexy. It’s a common problem, I think, with lesbian porn to want better camera angles. Lesbian porn is the one genre that could really benefit from multiple camera downloadable files. An important part of the Slayed scenes is the believable sexual tension between the models. I think lesbian porn is the easiest to fake, but I don’t feel like these scenes are faked, There is passion and lust in every scene. I don’t know if the producers allow the models to ad-lib, but the kinkiest parts of the scenes appear unplanned. The download limit is acceptable to me, but that is pertaining to Slayed only. The site has under 80 scenes. With the 25 scene weekly download limit you can still download every video on Slayed in a month membership. As for the value of the site/network, as a site, it would be good for a one month membership. As a network, it is more up to the person, to decide if the 7 sites are worth $50. From my side of it, I think it’s overpriced at $50. I’m not that big of a fan of any of their sites except Slayed and Deeper. For me, it would be more sensible to just join those two. There is a problem to me that will almost always land in the pros. The high production values. The problem with this studio is you get the samey feeling not just from scene to scene on the same site, but even across the different sites. I also believe that works against joining the 7 site bundle. With all that said, Slayed is a great site for lesbian fans and the quality is excellent. I just don’t think the Mad Cheddar bundle is worth the price of it. I have joined Deeper twice before and really enjoy it. The other sites – minus Slayed – are too much of the same thing for my taste. These sites pigeonhole themselves and their creativity with the genres and sticking to them. It seems to be the biggest mistake I see in porn. Sex is rarely the same, but a lot of the Mad Cheddar scenes are exactly the same. 11-06-22  06:27pm Replies (0) Review 154 Slime Wave (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I thought I would hate it, but I think I love it. Extremely erotic site with fake dicks and fake cum. Gloryhole setup on most scenes, some do not, makes the fake dick seem less fake. The performances by the women! Watching something that looks disgusting becoming sexy is erotic to me. Most of the scenes have the model in clothes making the ensuing mess even more messy and fun to watch. Cons: It's a small site, only 170 scenes, but I haven't watched a bad one yet. The multiple women scenes gets too confusing, fake dicks, fake cum, slime blasting, four women, the ones with one woman gives a more focused view. No dates on scenes, they have added one new scene to this site in the last 2 weeks. Bottom Line: In a lot of ways this might be my most excited review. I have seen WAM (wet and messy) porn and fake dick, fake cum scenes, but this site takes it to a whole other level. The women, the camerawork of focusing right where they need to focus, the slime (fake cum) dripping off the model's face, down to her thigh, sliding up to her pussy lips, it's some of the most erotic porn I have ever watched. These models should not be this excited should they? The fake dick squirts them at high impact, anywhere from 5-10 times in one scene. The aiming of the fake cum adds to it. In one scene, the blast of fake cum hits the model's clit at full impact. She looks like she's in orgasmic bliss. The scenes have no story to them. It's just like a random gloryhole scene. The first few scenes I watched I had to look twice to see that those are dildos. The cum or slime blast let's you know for sure. Some of the models are covered head to toe in slime by the end of the scenes. They love every blast of it. Maybe I feel a little biased. The first one I watched was probably the best scene on the site. The model with a skirt and hose on, rubbed the slime on her pussy and as she was doing it, a second blast hit her in the mouth. It is like these models are channeling their inner beliefs these are real men all cumming for them. The videos are clear even the 720p ones. They have 1080p too. The pictures add a new element of showing the fast action frame by frame. I'm not curious if other sites exist that do this on this high of a level. I watched one years ago and the women were giggling at the fake cum. Maybe it's the European models that are more convincing? This is a hard site to recommend to others, but it does come with access to Tainster and a selection of videos from Sinx. I would have been happy with just this site. That's how much I like this content. If you can look over the fake dicks and fake cum to watch sexy women in usually tight clothes, get soaked with slime, it really is worth a try. 09-02-19  10:28pm Replies (1) Review 155 Social Glamour (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Glamour site that focuses on a small amount of models. Current Halloween promo for $14.99 Gorgeous models and the feeling they are going for a little more than typical glamour models including a few heavier models that are just as pretty. I'm not for sure if all these models are big stars or not, but a couple of PU members told me the one on here, Gemma Massey, was a once huge tease star. Huge photo sets with 250+ photos being normal, can be downloaded and the resolution on the photos are massive 6700x4400. Easy site to use with a small amount of models, but large amount of overall content. Cons: Doesn't look like it's updating anymore. The newest update I've found was March 2019. Not near as much nudity as I expected. Videos aren't named videos, they are named "tease" and they are short, less than 5 minutes with annoying techno music in the background. 40GB Daily Download Limit, hard to believe you would hit it. Bottom Line: I guess there's a part of me that enjoys looking at beautiful women posing, in pretty clothes, and not just having sex. This site is good for that. We also could be looking at the site's biggest weakness. This site is really pushing the limits of "is it cable television or porn?" It's interesting how the site is made. They have only 26 models, but they have 3,488 photo sets and over 4,000 tease videos of those 26 models. I can't say I have ever seen a porn site like this one. I can't even for sure say this is a porn site. I watched 22GB of videos one day and didn't see anything more than full nudity with no masturbation. It is very artsy feeling. It is difficult to grade it just because the content is so high quality and there's so much of it, but for me, not exactly a porn connoisseur, it leaves me feeling like they left out the porn. I'll list a few of the most popular models just in case anyone is a collector or fan... Charley S, Gemma Massey, Lexi Lowe, Mica Martinez, Holly Gibbons and Anastasia Harris. All of these models look like what I would describe as high-level or top-tier models, but I will also add none of these models look young. They seem to fit more into the mid 20s to mid 30s age range. The picture sets are the stars of the site with resolutions I've never seen 6700x4300, picture sets that are 700MB in size. The level of tease in them is questionably high. Questionably because it's all most of the photo sets have. They have one photo set of Anastasia Harris that has 300 photos in it. She starts out in a one piece bathing suit. By picture 300 she still has the bottoms of the bathing suit on. That's a lot of pictures to only progress from bathing suit to topless. I'm sure there is a market for this type of content, I'm just not sure I'm part of it. The videos are even more frustrating. I once watched some videos on Met-Art and the teen to early 20 models, danced around, usually nude, but the shadows and camera angles stopped much from showing. These videos are of what look to be and are listed as older women that are dancing around, not even nude for 4-6 minutes. A couple of the more experience PU members told me about Gemma Massey. She is one of the ones that gets fully nude in her videos, but she just dry humps a bed and rolls around. I will also mention the daily download limit. It shows at the top of your screen with a bar to keeps track of your daily download activity. It counts videos you stream too. I downloaded a few and they are 1080p. I think if a person was a huge fan or collector of any of the models on this site this would be a treasure trove for them as most of the models have 150-200 photo sets and as many videos, but it still doesn't feel like porn to me. It also hasn't updated in 7 months. There are some really pretty models here with outstanding photo sets, but most just leave me wanting to see more, even the sets with 300 pictures. It's a good site, but needs more oomph to it. 10-28-19  11:02pm Replies (0) Review 156 Southern Sins (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: The name of the site threw me off course. This is an Australian site. Some really good voyeur-style scenes. The site has 43 scenes and is updating twice per month. Here’s you a pro/con depending on the person, pubic hair and hair in other places too which I will go into. There are photo sets that are downloadable and high quality, but only 32 of those. Video quality is very good, but no 4K. Cons: The pubic hair probably isn’t a turn-off for most, but there’s body hair I have read others complain about – underarm on the women. Scenes are way too short and there are behind the scenes videos mixed in. Bottom Line: One of the first things I thought when checking this site out was Atlanta (my sometimes home), Miami (wish it was my full-time home) and I was thinking like an American – not to mention, stereotyping. I was expecting a site based on stepfamily porn from southern states. I am a regular user of Australian sites like Abby Winters and Girls Out West. I don’t know why the Southern name is in there. I didn’t study much geography. My first thought when looking at the models was there are some really pretty models on here. One that really stood out to me is one I know from other Australian sites – Ruby Valentine, she’s one of my favorites even. I don’t know if I have just missed it on other sites, but she has full, black, underarm hair on this site. I am not going to say that’s a turn-off for me, but will say it’s not a turn-on for me either. Being of fair-complexion, I don’t have a lot of body hair and it’s just not something I’m used to seeing on women. I don’t mind her pubic hair at all. I believe pubic hair on darker complected models is sexy. That seems to be the basis of the site. It says it showcases people celebrating themselves and life. There are some interesting scenes I have never seen on other sites or if I have, those other sites made the scenes look contrived. For example, there is a scene titled, “Yoga Lesson” and it’s 6-7 women outdoors, nude, doing yoga. Where it kind of falls flat is there’s no sex at all in it. It looks like 6-7 real women just doing naked yoga in the wilderness. Is there a big market for “porn” like that? I get the part that says this could be a fantasy for someone to walk up on a group of nude women doing yoga, but they are seriously doing yoga and not just doing it for preparation for an all-out, wild orgy. The solo scenes are probably my favorite scenes on this site, aided by Ruby Valentine being in a couple of those. I watched the behind the scenes videos just to see if maybe those were the BTS videos that are interesting. I’m going on the side of personal preference, I didn’t find those very interesting, no more than I would a Netflix documentary on new-age therapy. Maybe the variation in scenes offers some value and interest? There are scenes (I typed sins) with voyeurism, but just a few. One of the niches I would like to see more of has a scene of it on this site. A guy standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. I really believe that’s a niche that is way underused in porn. It could even be a woman standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. That’s an element I don’t think porn producers these days think about. Us that are watching it are like the person standing at the door. I would make a whole site of that niche. I do think the site is worth checking out especially if either of these parts interest you – Ruby Valentine (she has 5 solo scenes on here that are all great) or hairy porn interests you. Maybe that should be called “natural” porn? Seems more marketable to me. The sex is believable. The videos can be downloaded at 540p, 720p and 1080p. The photo sets can be downloaded as well, but I do believe if Ruby Valentine and hairy doesn’t interest you, you may not like this site as much as I do. 10-19-21  01:19pm Replies (0) Review 157 Strokies (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Impressive handjob, tease and blowjob site. Weekly update 575 scenes and the women are all above average in looks. Every scene has 4K download option and 1080p. Downloads are unlimited and included in membership. Surprising to me, the newer scenes are better than the older scenes. Cons: Seems to be using the same guys for most scenes. That becomes boring for me. Older scenes are very short and more formulaic. Bottom Line: Gay male sites have pushed me away. I decided to try this straight handjob site featuring some really pretty young women. Handjobs can be boring and repetitive. Just like solo male can be. You start realizing there’s just not a lot to do with the male body. It's different for me to see the newer scenes improving in comparison to the older scenes. Most sites I have joined are the opposite of that. Most sites look like they start out strong, get bored and just start making the same scene over and over. This site has added some depth to the handjobs over the years. You get some edging, some frenulum play, very intense tongue teasing, it’s really good and sexy. I don’t know most of these models. The bios of the models lead me to believe they are mostly pro models, but I haven’t seen them before. Their names even look like pro models. Maybe they are, but at least they are attractive. The last straight handjob site I joined had a lot of average or below looking women. These women are a step or two up. The videos include some interview and talking before the handjob starts. Most of the models seem to have a set script they are building from. The older scenes were mostly under 15 minutes. The newer scenes are over 20 and many are over 30 minutes. They have added some depth to the scenes. That, if nothing else, makes it seem like these women really enjoy giving a handjob. I do believe, with my limited knowledge, of the genre, that is very important. I was shocked to see that every scene has HD and 4K downloads and there over 500 scenes. It’s not a brand-new site. Looks like it started in 2015. They have a weekly update every Friday. They also include photos and zip downloads. The real attraction is those newer scenes that feature edging. I don’t think there’s many things in porn more exciting for a female than seeing the guy struggle through holding his orgasms only to finally get to release. That’s one of my favorite parts of porn. I could get by with cumshot compilations. The cumshots on Strokies are very good too. That leads to the negative. Even with the additions of edging and teasing, it's still just a handjob site. There are a lot of scenes where they female will also masturbate, but they could do so much more with that. I have to turn to tube sites to find mutual masturbation. Which is a very popular niche, but no one except amateurs seem to be doing it. Strokies comes the closest on mutual masturbation. They will have the female straddle the guy’s leg and hip area with her legs spread open and touching herself while she masturbates the guy with her other hand. Scenes like that would move the site up to my favorite if they did that more often. That is a very good niche to me. I did mention in the cons there’s not a lot of different guys and that’s based just on the penis I can see. I feel like I know the guy at this point. I would recognize your dick from a crowd of dicks! That maybe hurts the site a little. I have heard of the term stunt cock before. That’s in hardcore sex where there are 8-10 positions per scene. There’s not much variation on a handjob site. The same penis right there in the camera view in every scene. Maybe dress it up in a little suit? I know that there are other women out there that feel the same way. You watch enough of these scenes and you will have seen this guy’s penis more than your boyfriend’s. Sorry about the joking around. There’s just not a lot to talk about in handjob porn. It's a very good site. I haven’t ever found that much attraction to handjob porn even though it seems like I should. I will come back to this one. It would be a good site to try out if you’re curious about handjob porn. It has enough variations to keep it from being strict handjob porn. 07-11-22  09:10pm Replies (0) Review 158 Summer Sinners (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Outdoor, group, orgy, exhibitionism, voyeurism, a little bit of everything except what you expect from regular porn. Attractive male and female models including some well-known pornstars. The rest, I think, are amateurs with futures in porn. Such a diverse site: Scenes in the ocean, pool, backyard, kitchen table while someone watches. Major points for switching things up. Excellent video quality with some scenes having 4K, the rest have up to 1080p and are all downloadable. Downloadable photo sets add a lot to the scenes with multiple people. Very believable and realistic sex. Cons: Scenes are not long enough. It does look like they are going for realism with some of the guys unable to make it to 10 minutes before orgasm. Not much story to the scenes. The length of the scenes show this. It’s like the scenes started before the filming started and the filming focuses on the sex. Bottom Line: The Adult Prime network was recommended to me by another Porn User member and I have to say – I’m impressed. This is one of the sites from it and it’s one of the best – though on the smaller side – sites I have been a member of in recent months, maybe even years. The premise of this site’s content is it’s “all about sun, sea and sex, watch these crazy men and women on vacation and go wild.” That sums up the story for every scene. It feels very real. This doesn’t make me think there’s a casting director and producer trying to create something sexy. It is more of a site that gives me the feeling of young men and women just having spontaneous fun and lots of sex. There are known pornstars on this site including Mea Malone and Amirah Adara, just to name a few in the newest scene. This is probably as close as you’re going to get to true exhibitionism porn even though it looks to be in a controlled environment. It’s rare for me to say the sex is a major plus, but that’s the case on this site. These people look like they have been waiting all day to have sex and go at it like the doomsday clock is ticking down – got to get just one more orgasm! It makes the sex really stand out compared to most porn sites. The word organic sounds funny in porn, but that is the feeling on Summer Sinners. There are currently 66 scenes with two new updates per month. All of the videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p and 1080p or streamed in those as well. Some of the scenes also have 4K downloads. The photos are a nice addition and can be downloaded as well. What looks like realistic and believable sex also leads to realistic and believably short scenes. That is kind of a con. The ability to make these scenes look spontaneous could even qualify as a con. If there are more than 2-4 people in the scene, the camera has to switch from couple to couple and sometimes the couples are not even close to each other in proximity. The combination of these possible cons is the biggest downside to the site for me. Not only are the cameras moving from couple to couple, but some scenes are even daytime (sunlight) during the first 7-8 minutes then goes to evening (dusk) for the final 7-8 minutes of the scene. That’s a little disappointing. There are 8-10 people in the scene and it’s clearly filmed over a 12 hour period – why only a 15 minute scene? If these scenes were in the 30-60 minute range, this site would score even higher with me. By the end of the outdoor group scenes there’s a feeling that I didn’t even see what all happened between each couple. There could be another slight problem depending on the viewer. There is a mixture of languages being spoken. Subtitles would help a lot. Some of the models (male and female) speak English, others don’t and some speak English, but you can tell it’s not their native language. There’s a lot of laughing and funny things being said which I believe would add to the scenes if I knew what was being said. It’s still a very good site just for the varied settings. The indoor scenes are often better just because you don’t get the moving around of cameras. The sex, indoor and outdoor, front door and back door (more fitting?) is very believable. There is a lot of playfulness in the scenes and I do get the feeling these models are having fun. It’s enjoyable to watch. I just wish the scenes were longer and I understood the different languages being spoken. I hope my score isn’t too high based on subjectivity of finally seeing porn that looks people having fun and sex at the same time. It tops the feeling of “this is supposed to be romantic and dull” or “this is supposed to be rough and unpleasant for the woman” and hits a sweet spot of having fun and sex. 10-19-21  01:30pm Replies (0) Review 159 Sweethearts Classics (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Fresh faced teens you probably never saw before Tags for searching Part of Adult Prime network of over 75 sites Adding scenes once a week Uses Epoch as a biller Cons: All remastered videos. The quality varies quite a bit as some of the original videos are not possible to convert to modern quality. However remastered is better than unwatchable quality. The site needs growth as there are almost 50 videos, but there are many, many more older scenes that need a makeover sitting in the Club Sweetheart archives. Bottom Line: This site had its origins as a magazine in 1995 and was then called Club Seventeen. The models have always been of legal age, 18 and older and this was just a name. Recently it has been renamed as Club Sweethearts and is the main site within the Adult Prime network. As many of its scenes were filmed before High Definition became available, many of the better scenes need an upgrade. Those scenes that have been redone are now on this site, Sweetheart Classics. As of right now, there are almost fifty scenes that have been remastered. I hope many more are redone as the content really caught my interest. Much of the porn made in recent years has been dull and too much like they are made in a factory. Many scenes are ten minutes of this, five minutes of that and another ten minutes of another act. The models change, but the scenes are almost clones. A few years ago, porn was a bit more creative. Seventeen of the scenes are groups with a lesbian theme. They are named: lesbian swimming team, lesbian garden party, five girl lesbian pop group, lesbian orgy, seven girls and a bottle of oil, all girl water polo team, lesbian orgy at the stables, lesbian sex Olympics, four girl dildo party, lesbian army invasion, three sporty lesbians, four girls, two water bikes, four girl lesbian carwash, ballet girl orgy, five girls in a foam bath, a three girl get together. There are seven other lesbian scenes. There are also seven group scenes with boy/girl sex. The mix may change as they add content, but as of today it seems to me to have a theme of a lot of group lesbian sex scenes that I like. I read once that in porn today they do not use very many models in a scene and that is to reduce cost. In a group scene, you can see a lot of interaction in ways that modern porn does not attempt. There is always another pussy to be seen, always another one to be licked, always another with a toy or a wand being used. Sometimes there are two or three on one and often the pairings switch. It reminds me of a sex buffet. The models are young and thin white women from Eastern Europe. I am not sure how many went on to a porn career or how many have their only scene here. It seemed to me they are fresh and eager with that special glow of exploratory sex. I thought the models added some natural sexiness to the visuals. In reading some of the replies to the videos, members have posted that some of them have another porn name that they have used. I can’t say there is much I don’t like about the content, but for me they seem to use more toys and wands than I would prefer. That may be a hint that they are made for male fantasy or it may just be that is how lesbian porn was made then. I am basically nitpicking, but I like more tender lesbian sex and a bit more of a relaxed pace. Don't get me wrong, I liked the scenes here. One of my teachers once told me there is always room for improvement. In all fairness, as much as they try to improve the quality of older videos, they don’t look anywhere near as sharp and clear as newly made High Definition ones are. There is only so much you can do to enhance the quality, but there are many scenes here that I would not have even bothered trying before they were remastered. The site was easy to use, the tags let you have an easy search, the download speeds fast enough and with over 75 sites in the network, more than enough to keep you busy. 10-19-21  01:10pm Replies (0) Review 160 Taboo Heat (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A standalone site that has a large selection of their content on Adult Time. This review is of the standalone site and will note the number of scenes can be viewed/downloaded with an Adult Time account. It is nice to know so many porn stars are related by marriage. The scenes are fun. The actors and actresses in these scenes seem to have a lot of experience playing these roles. I even think a lot of what is fun, is just tongue-in-cheek humor from the actors and actresses. It looks like they are trying to make each other laugh. That was bound to happen in this niche. The standalone version has 178 scenes. I don’t know about this update schedule. Based on their dates, it has updated 14 times in January, today is the 23rd. On Adult Time, you can view and download 68 of the scenes. I joined it because I liked the 68 scenes on Adult Time. Very long, story-themed Cons: It has been done to death. I do think that two sites excel at the niche, this one and Family Strokes. That could push people away. The not perfect female models in some of the scenes. There are some chubby women in this as stepmoms. I see it as a positive. If you’re just watching porn for the looks and visual arousal, this may not be the best site for you, especially considering the long scenes. Bottom Line: The first time I watched a faux stepfamily porn scene, I wasn’t for sure how I felt about it. I don’t have a stepfamily. That does put the burden on the story, the dialogue, the explanations, the actor and actresses being believable in their roles. I mean no offense to the porn industry or models. That is really asking more than a lot of porn models (male and female) are capable of doing. She can deepthroat an 11 inch dick. She doesn’t need to be able to act. Or she has the perfect body, who cares if she can make me believe that is her stepbrother? That’s a part of porn niches I believe is vastly overlooked. I was watching the scenes on Adult Time and it had a special promo to join Taboo Heat’s standalone site. I have had mostly good experiences with standalone sites produced by major sites. One of my favorites, as mentioned above, Family Stokes, is from Team Skeet. Know that in advance. If you are seeing the Taboo Heat scenes on Adult Time, you are not even seeing half of the scenes Taboo Heat has. If you like those on Adult Time, it’s a definite upgrade that you will want to take. This is very creative and fun porn. This is also a good break from typical porn. The variations of models. I would like to see more races. I think in stepfamily, real-life situations, you have more interracial. You do get stepmoms that looks like they could be stepmoms. One that I was really impressed with is Cory Chase. She seems to be everybody’s stepmom! She is pretty, she looks to be early 40s and in excellent shape. I would think that’s a common age range for a stepmother of young adults. This site does that better than any of the stepfamily sites I have seen. There is enough believable age difference (in appearance, maybe not in real life), to make me believe these stepmoms are that horny. On the standalone site, you have access to 178 scenes. I’m going to take an educated guess when I say this. If you like Cory Chase, you will love this site. It almost seems like this is or was her own site. She is in 169 of the scenes. The pro I listed as humor was based on that. She’s everybody’s stepmom. That makes all the others everyone’s stepsibling. I have joined some sites later (thanks to Christmas deals), that made me feel like the sites take themselves way too seriously. This site doesn’t. It reminds me of one of those B-level reality shows. You can’t help but keep watching it. You can get a taste of it on Adult Time. I will say again if you like the Adult Time scenes from this site it should be no question that you’re going to join this standalone site. I joined it without knowing if it had that many more scenes. It has 110 more. That was definitely worth to me. There are cute, younger stepdaughters. Mostly cute, younger stepsons. The update schedule hasn’t been manipulated. It looks like they are releasing a scene every other day on average. I don’t know if they maybe had a vault of the scenes stored up and ready to go. At their current pace they will have over 240 new scenes just this year. All of the 178 scenes have the full complement of download options from 160p to 4K and there are a total of 8 download resolutions. I find the 720 or 1080 are best for me. These scenes are long. The photos are not going to compete with the studios known for photos. Most only have 15-30 photos in them. I think the model list on the standalone site gives an idea that you better like Cory Chase. There are only 26 females in the 178 scenes. There are a few other “stepmoms” that I kind of think they need to work in some more. I don’t know if there’s a risk of overexposure of Cory Chase. You are going to question how she has this many stepchildren. The stories, the dialogue is very good. Cory probably should be a mainstream actress. Which is why I am guessing they use her in so many scenes on this site. Very little to complain about unless you just have trouble believing one woman has this many stepchildren. Considering how good her performances are, she may convince me of how she ended up with so many stepchildren. There is the ending question of does a site like this help or hurt Adult Time? It’s obviously their site. Would they benefit more by having it in full on Adult Time? Probably not in the short-term. Maybe that is why there are so many updates. I do believe Adult Time is risking cannibalizing itself. I did get it on a Christmas special as an add-on. It would still be worth the full price if you like the content. I just don’t know about long-term. Really good site, probably the best, if you are into the stepfamily porn niche and like Cory Chase. If you like all those there is no reason for you to hesitate in joining it. 02-09-22  07:01am Replies (0) Review 161 Tainster (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I find this to be one of the most complete and unique networks available -- now including bonus content from Sinx. 15 websites included plus the Sinx bonus content. The most niche-driven network I have been a member of. Website works well, layout is easy to find what you're looking for and everything on the site makes sense. Extremely creative scenes that at times seem to be too creative and become confusing. Cons: No model list No dates on content or listed update schedules No real explanation of what Sinx is, you have access to 10-20 scenes from sites owned by other companies. You can sign up for more for another $20. Bottom Line: I'm going to start out with a list of sites you receive with Tainster. Fully Clothed Sex Fully Clothed Pissing Tyrannized Mad Sex Party Party Hardcore Leony April All WAM Slime Wave My Fetish Orgasmatics Cum Squad Pee Squad Pissing in Action Pornstars at Home Swinging Pornstars That are very different sites. They add the bonus Sinx content which has scenes from - French Fuck Friends, Real Agent, UK Fuck Friends, Asian Sex Diary, Lil Miss Arab, Worldwide Wanking, Trike Patrol, Tuk Tuk Patrol, three different German sites, retro, gonzo and fetish. That's the part that gets confusing. Some of these scenes you can watch and download. Some you have to pay $3.95 each or $7.95 for the whole niche. As varied as Tainster's sites are you would think they wouldn't add more to their network to confuse you. These sites -- in my opinion -- have either lost content from the past or they've combined scenes. Their promos have also changed. I originally went to sign up with a $9.95 per month promo. The best deal it would give me was 23.99 Euro. The best sites on the network, for me, are Fully Clothed Sex, Fully Clothed Pissing and Slime Wave. Each of these focus on the women models in business type clothes and they're either getting their clothes were from cum, piss or someone throwing water on them. It's a little more fetish-based than I normally would go for, but the production values are very good even without subtitles. More than anything this feels like European porn. It doesn't have the personality of a lot of American porn, but it has a higher level of eroticism. The My Fetish site is an easy to overlook one and maybe it should be. The scenes seem to be the fetish of someone we don't know and that doesn't really tell us what the fetish is. These scenes to include people having sex in public with other, dressed people sitting around. Comparing it to my past subscriptions to Tainster, I have to admit, I don't prefer this new version. Some of the bonus content is good, but the majority of it has to be bought and I'm confident they have removed anywhere from 100-200 scenes from each of their sites. It is still worth a membership, but your expectations should be tempered by the knowledge of knowing things have changed. With no update schedule and no dated content it does kind of feel like they are not updating any of the sites. One of the newest updates doesn't have any HD options, not 720p, not 1080p, while the 6 previous scenes had both 720p and 1080p. As a whole it is a good network for those into kinkier content, but I won't be sticking around for more than a month. By the way, the biller canceled fast and with no problems even though I had not heard of them before. 09-16-19  09:06pm Replies (0) Review 162 Team Skeet (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Very good network if you follow one step: Click "show my content" in the left margin. It removes all the locked content. My biggest interest was Innocent High. As a former Catholic schoolgirl, I have something of a fetish towards schoolgirl content. They have 3,551 scenes available with the standard Team Skeet membership. If you were to update to all their upgrade sites it would add another 1,500 scenes. The scenes I have watched stuck to the main theme of each site. That could be a con too. The video quality goes from 360p up to 1080p, no 4K that I can see. The picture sets are downloadable. The girls on here are mostly really cute/pretty. The guys are guys I see on other sites. Epoch is the biller. Cons: They really could do something with the navigation. If you click "show my content" it takes away all the locked content. But, if you look at their sites, they have 47, there's no way to know which ones you have access to. I recognize a few of them as standalone sites like Family Strokes. They even have a filter on the sites, but not one for "show my sites". I'm with some of the others, why not just offer all the sites in one package and even raise the price? I can't imagine what the price would be to add those sites as an upgrade. Bottom Line: Innocent High was one of the first porn sites I was interested in. I spent the majority of my teen years wearing schoolgirl outfits and I really believe it has a sexual effect on the wearer. Those scenes are good, but they could be a lot better. I won't say the content has a generic feel to it, but it kind of does. What I mean by that is it feels like they film a scene, pull the model out of the clothes, stick another model in the clothes and do it again. Their site Family Strokes is really entertaining. It's kind of silly and it has a lot more personality than some of the sites included with Team Skeet. I would say I would be willing to pay $49 for all of their sites. If anyone knows how much that upgrade is, please let me know. The Stepsibilings site is the best of their newer sites that come with the Team Skeet standard membership. All of the sites have some good scenes on them, but you have to click on them and see if you need to upgrade. The video quality is very good as is the streaming player. It's one of the better streaming players I have used. I don't like focusing so much of the review on the negative of the navigation, but it does make the site very hard to use. Once you click on "Show my content", you have no other options except to scroll through 3,500 scenes. I am a fan of CFNM and they have a CFNM site on here. It's not the standard CFNM style content. It's one on one and usually ends in sex. Here are the sites from the top 10 sites they have that are included in the basic membership: Exxxtra Small, Teen Pies, Teen Curves, Innocent High, Stepsiblings, I'm going to stop here for an important part. Those are in the top 10 of their listed sites. That means you receive 5 of their top 10 sites with a standard membership. After those, there's only one upgrade site in the next 10. You receive 14 of the top 20. While I was going through those results, I did notice an upgrade button and it says if you choose the upgrade you are charged annually. That makes it not as likely to interest me. I would be better off just joining each of the upgrade sites I am interested in for one month at $10 each. I wouldn't be interested in their upgrade sites if they had poor content. They have some really fun and sexy content. I have enjoyed it so far and think I will make a list of the sites they list as upgrades and just join one each month. This is a mostly teen network. There are some MILF sites on it, but even those have a teen in them. I like it as much or better than the other American networks I have joined. Good, fun network and I guess I should give them a nice word for not charging the upgrades automatically like other sites do. I have clicked on multiple upgrades and there is a green button that says "upgrade now". They're at least fair with it. 10-08-19  01:32am Replies (0) Review 163 Teen Mega World (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Large network of mostly teen hardcore porn. More than 20 sites included. Cute, pretty, almost exclusively slim and slender models. The different sites work as the navigation. Each site covers a themed niche. Newer videos are downloadable in 4K Nearly daily update across the network. Cons: When you’re pretty, sexy, slim, young, you don’t have to be a good actress! The humor is often not meant to be humor. That’s a good con. Bottom Line: This has been one of the most popular mega networks since I started joining porn sites. I’m going to lay out the main thought I have with the network. If you like slim, young, pretty, sexy young women you’re going to like this network. I don’t know if the niches or fetishes beyond looks even matter. The technical parts of the network tick all the boxes. Up to 4K downloads. Zip files for picture downloads. HD videos if you don’t want the 4K ones. Navigation is simple thanks to the different sites working as categories or niches. They also are updating nearly daily. The price is cheap too. The not as obvious major problem I have with the network is the languages and lack of subtitles and even attempting to act. Most of these models would be just as believable and interesting if they didn’t try to act. Despite having the different niches and sites, there’s not a lot different between the scenes. That to me is the big negative. This is porn how porn used to be. The most important part is the looks and allure of the models. Different people will feel differently about that, but I am mentioning it despite a high score. This is one of those networks that you can see does everything right. The negatives are going to be different, more or even less per member. The first site I joined years ago was Nubiles.net. The content here reminds me of the hardcore content on Nubiles. That is a compliment in that the models are pretty and quality is high, but there doesn’t seem to be much chemistry between the people having sex. The different sites and niches could also be improved. Most of these sites have the same style of porn on them with one slight difference – for example, creampies. Other sites have a different action that is excluded in the scenes on their other sites like anal sex. I beieve a network like this one does show the limitations on porn. You have a couple ways of making a successful porn site. One is with high quantity and quality. That’s what Teen Mega World is focused on. The models’ looks make up for the poor acting. With all this said, I doubt I will join it again and that’s even with me rating it a 90. It’s just not what I look for in porn, but I know it’s what a lot of Porn Users do look for. Just be sure and check out the content before joining. 11-28-22  02:13pm Replies (0) Review 164 Teenrs (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Teen network that includes 5 (small) sites featuring a specific niche on each site. It's different, I really thought I was going to have buyer's remorse, but the scenes are quite good and I ended up liking it. Unless I am counting wrong, I'm counting 145 scenes on the entire network of 5 sites, but want to add, I downloaded 50 of the scenes. Videos have 540p, 720p and 1080p options, there are screencaps, but I haven't found a way to download them. Most of the videos are long, averaging 45 minutes each and most involve more than two people. Cons: Four of the five sites haven't updated since 2016 and the one that is updating, hasn't updated since November 20th, 2019 (more than two weeks ago). There are good ideas here, there's creativity, why stop producing this content? It wants to upgrade me to a very large, confusing network with 14,000+ videos, but doesn't tell the price. Bottom Line: If I had to pick a favorite niche in porn it would be CFNM. They have a site here called CFNM 18. I knew it was going to be a small site, but didn't know how small. It has 14 scenes on it. They are all very good scenes and will be saved with my other CFNM videos from other sites, they are creative, they scenes are long with a couple lasting over an hour and they're exactly what I like in CFNM. The last update was in 2016. I also like the sites where games are played, strip poker type games, the various naked twister type games and they have a site called Spicy Roulette. I was looking forward to see what they could do to make a roulette wheel sexy and there's 12 scenes on it. These scenes are good, they are fun, and these are major group sex scenes which I really don't see a lot of anymore. The scenes on Spicy Roulette feature as many as 3 males and 5 females, you'll have two or three women riding the men and two of the women tribbing in the distance. Very sexy scenes. They have a site called My Dr. Feelgood, which is the medical niche and it's one I like. It has 10 scenes on it. These are good and again, very long scenes in the 45 minutes range. It just feels like someone had a busy year in 2016 and decided to stop filming porn. Next is 18Dom, which is a pretty sad attempt at domination porn as 18 year old female models are "dominating" men. The scenes are not bad or believable. The models in all of the scenes on this network are very pretty and like the other sites I've listed so far, this one has long videos in the 30 minute range. The domination is about as believable as the number of scenes I'm going to say, it has 13 scenes on it. These kind of remind me of CFNM scenes except the models end up nude. It's mostly soft "physical violence" like a 90 pound woman forcing the man down. The last site in the network is Club Exclusive and it is the one that updated on November 20, 2019, it has nearly 100 scenes on it, but there's something to note here. These scenes have the Club Sweetheart watermark on them so they are from Club Sweethearts, they're pretty good scenes overall, there's creativity, some even have a CFNM type feel to them, there are handjobs, even a couple go into the strip games, so I guess it works as a good way to preview Club Sweethearts. The other four sites are generally better than it as you can tell those sites had a lot of thought put into their scenes. If those first four sites had around 50 scenes on each, I would score this network very high, but instead, I got around 50 scenes total and nearly all came from those first 4 sites. All wasn't lost as I've joined a few sites where I don't download anything. If those 4 niche sites interest you and you find a good deal like I did, it might be worth it to join and grab the scenes from those sites. If those niches don't interest you, I don't think you're going to be too happy or impressed with this tiny network. I felt like an 80 is a fair score just based on the content on those first 4 sites being very good. 12-02-19  11:57pm Replies (2) Review 165 The Life Erotic (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I thought for sure, one of my highest rated sites would stumble some, but it’s not happening. I try not to be too focused on body types, but I have been slim and “undeveloped” my whole adult life. The majority of models on TLE are slim and not “blessed” in the chest. I can relate to these women and learn from them. The site is huge and you can almost always find promos; just be sure it’s not streaming-only. Updates have been 2-3 videos per week and 2-3 picture sets a week. The site has just over 3,000 picture sets and just over 1,500 videos Tags, search, are all near perfect Cons: Back to my enjoyment of slim models. That could be a con for some of you. I can’t really complain much about update frequency, but I do think this site used to update more than now. Bottom Line: I hadn’t been a member of The Life Erotic for nearly 3 years. The last time I reviewed it, I gave it a 97. There’s good and bad news. The site hasn’t changed much since then and easily earns an upper 90s score. But if you didn’t like the site before, you probably won’t like it now. The scenes are masturbation, solo. The picture sets are a lot like what you would expect from a Met Art owned site. That means large resolution and mostly pretty poses that accentuate the models’ natural beauty. The site really is huge and still updating. The numbers are above in the pros. My first porn site I joined was Nubiles and a part of me still prefers picture sets and videos of pretty/cute models masturbating for the camera. That helps The Life Erotic a lot. The porn you’ll find on The Life Erotic is not as tame as most softcore sites. It’s even quite hardcore – for masturbation scenes. I have jointed all the Met-Art owned sites including the Met Art Network, but I still have to say, I think The Life Erotic is the best of the entire group. Met Art does still photography near perfect. Met Art X is good solo masturbation porn. Sex Art is great story-based hardcore male/female porn. The Life Erotic takes a little of the best from each of those and combines them into one site. One of the most recent scenes even shows the depth of the scenes. It has one of my favorites, Paloma, she is bound with tape and a gag in her mouth. She dances around even with the tape on her. She lowers herself towards a chair that has a big dildo strapped to it. She teases the dildo and herself until it’s inside her and she’s riding it. That’s not what I usually expect from a solo masturbation site. The scenes are really top-notch and the production is great. The scenes aren’t typically long, but are usually long enough that you don’t feel like they’re rushing through, but also doesn’t make you think the scenes are too drawn out. These feel like real masturbation sessions. The video quality downloads are HD and 4K. The pictures are downloadable in zips and that I know of, there is no download limit. If you have used any of the Met-Art sites the navigation will be familiar to you. The tags are great as is the search. The model list is helpful as well. There’s hardly nothing to call a con, other than if you don’t like the models. It’s a site I would even call “special”. It won’t be another 3 years before I join again. This should be a 2-3 time join per year for me. 04-09-24  06:11pm Replies (0) Review 166 The Life Erotic (0) 97.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: My de facto favorite site by Met Art. They have 1,227 models and they are of different looks, ages and builds. There are 1,264 videos and 2,813 photo sets. Thankfully, the archive of content is bigger here than most of their sites, they are only updating The Life Erotic every 4-5 days. All videos and photo sets can be downloaded and I can confirm as much as possible there’s no download limit. I have about 80% of the content from the site. Something you do not see as much on the Met Art sites is rubber/latex clothing, it adds an edgy feel to what can seem like a clinical group of sites. 174 of the scenes are lesbian including some group. The rest are solo. Cons: It doesn’t feel like a con in 2021 since so many sites are no longer even updating, but I wish they could speed the updates up a little. As it is, you can expect 7-8 updates per month. They don’t have as many lesbian scenes these days. I don’t know if that’s a byproduct of Covid or not, but it’s also not a deathblow con. Bottom Line: In my recent trip through the world of Met Art, I have realized a lot of sites are happy (meaning the majority of their customers are too) with sticking with a tried and tested formula. The Life Erotic is Met Art’s Henry David Thoreau’s man who who marches to the drum he hears no matter how far away. It’s still mostly just women masturbating or the 174 lesbian scenes, but the mold is broken here. It’s not a criticism of Met Art or their sites. The models are gorgeous, young, very fit, some even look a little skinny and that’s coming from someone who was under 100 pounds last year. The Life Erotic’s newest update even shows a perfect example of what I mean. It’s the former superstar European model Blue Angel. My first memberships to porn sites included 21 Sextury which had a solo Blue Angel site on it, she was a young, slender model back then. She’s now in her 30s, has filled out more and no longer looks like the innocent flower waiting to be crushed by the porn industry. One thing I normally would not talk about as a positive or negative on a porn site are the descriptions of the scenes, but the descriptions on The Life Erotic tell some perteinent information like this new Blue Angel scene is produced by another former superstar European model Sandra Shine, who I know also produces some on at least one other site. It makes every scene, especially the newer ones, worth looking at, reading the descriptions of and surprisingly adds a lot to the content. I do believe this is the most explicit of the Met Art sites unless you count ALS Scan and I think they are about equal. The site is large with a combined 4,000 plus videos and photo sets. All can be downloaded in high quality and there are no limits. You also will get the broader range of model types on this site. I believe the update schedule is somewhere in the middle ground since it’s hard to to complain about a site updating every 4 days when most sites are not currently updating at all, but most of the Met Art sites are updating daily. If the update schedule was better the score would be a little higher, there’s not much room to go up. They do score extra points for being more creative than any of the other Met Art sites except maybe Sex Art which may be too creative at times. The masturbation on The Life Erotic is more “erotic” to me. It could be the models are a little older than the other Met Art sites, it could be their outfits which sometimes include crotchless bodysuits and masks. This is not going to be meant how it sounds. There’s more meat on the bones here and that has nothing to do with the models’ builds. There’s more to the content. This is easily one of my favorite sites. It’s so high on my sites I was planning on just joining it and ALS Scan which I like almost as much as The Life Erotic, but there was a special offer for the entire Met Art network and I took it. I’m not surprised The Life Erotic and ALS Scan are still my favorite two sites on that network. The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p all are mp4 files and they also offer a WMV and DivX download. I know what WMV is, but really don’t know what the DivX is or why it’s offered. The photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes. The biggest sizes are over 4000x2600. It’s very close to a perfect site for me and I think it earns a “seriously underrated” mention. The only thing I would change besides speeding up the updates is I would maybe push the envelope a little more with some light bondage. They have the outfits on for it. 04-06-21  02:28am Replies (0) Review 167 The Life Erotic (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: For my money, the best of the Met-Art sites. 1,183 models, 1,143 videos and 2,691 photo sets. Videos and photos are downloadable. No restrictions. 8 video updates and 8 photo set updates per month. Themes with many of the scenes, whether they're believable is a different question. Includes girl/girl scenes too. Cons: I have seen a few of the scenes on other sites in the Met Art network. The naming of the scenes can be confusing. Bottom Line: The Life Erotic is like what most softer sites seem to be going for when they step outside the softcore realm. There's light BDSM, masturbation with objects (heels, corn on the cob, various insertions), there's wax play, a few scenes in October even used fake blood for Halloween themed scenes. There's more creativity here and I like it. One thing you might be surprised by is the amount of close-ups in masturbation. Some are close enough to see the clits getting harder/swollen. The models are almost all very attractive and there's over 1,000 of them. They seem to be trying to break away from being a photo focused site even though their total numbers show more than double the photo sets as videos, the updates are including an equal amount of videos as photo sets. The video quality on the newer videos go up to 4K and go down to 260p with 5 options between those including 720p and 1080p. Adding themes, not really stories, to the scenes adds a more interesting twist to these scenes. Some of it seems forced like a woman masturbating with a heel. The blood scenes, even the hot wax scenes seem to be something they're not completely comfortable filming, but they are a welcome change to the formulaic world of harder softcore porn. This site would be a great choice for those that like harder masturbation. There's a lot of dripping, creamy, orgasms, very fast fingering, use of extreme objects and even suction pumps. It does a really good job of separating itself from other softcore masturbation sites by -- in my opinion -- showing how women really masturbate. There's not a lot of artsy points in it, but speaking for myself, there's not a lot artistic about my masturbating so I can relate more to this content. My biggest complaint is the naming of the scenes. They will have one with the model's name or action and a number like Pumping Hard 2, you find other scenes by the model and there's Afternoon Fantasy 2. I'm going to try and put that together that they have a series called Pumping Hard and there are other parts featuring other models doing a similar action (suction) and it's not scenes being split into parts. With that being my only real complaint, it shows why I really like this site and nearly all of its content. 12-08-19  08:41pm Replies (0) Review 168 The White Boxxx (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Labor day Sale price of $9.94 for a month Comes with other 17 Lets Doe it sites Almost 350 visually stunning and hot scenes Updates are once a week Many of the prettiest pornstars there are Great production values, the videos look great Uses tags for easy searching, but searching is across the network Cons: Monthly download limit of 100 videos across the network More hot videos than I can handle. Sometimes I am feeling so naughty because I wish I was one of these women Bottom Line: When I think of couple friendly porn, this is the kind of site I imagine. These are videos any couple I can think of would feel comfortable sharing. The sex is unrushed, slow and just so sensual. The scenes progress in heat until the couples build to a climax and so do, I right along with them. Many of the videos focus on the woman and what she wants and needs sexually. She is seen as empowered and sexually liberated. In many scenes she is so seductive that her man finds her irresistible. A big reason is that these women tease their guys, a fantasy I often have. In many scenes the foreplay includes a vibrator and a lot of hot kissing and other attention from her man. One of my favorite scenes stars Rebecca Volpetti and Lutro. It is called “My Insatiable Girlfriend”. I was feeling a bit warm just reading the title. She ties him to a bed and takes advantage of him. He is there just to please her. In another scene the same two models are shown as he is not interested, so she teases him by fingering herself. She uses a vibrator while he is “punished” by being forced to watch her masturbate. That would teach any man the uselessness of ignoring a woman in heat. After these two scenes I have become a big fan hers. She also has a few great lesbian scenes that I wish I had a chance to be in. I have never been with a woman, but she is so tempting I could imagine what it would be like with her. Every scene is a professional production and the attention to detail is very enjoyable. Hair, makeup, setting, lighting, and the camerawork are just so well done that I feel this site is one that others should imitate. I see that the network has won numerous industry awards over the years, such as best paysite, best network , best lesbian and best hardcore sites. I would say that I recognize a few of the stars, both male and female, and that they are some of the best looking in the industry. The site uses tags, but the results are for the whole network, not just the one site. The download limit of 100 scenes per month is also across the network. On this site alone, there are nearly 350 videos, so that has to be a negative. Now that I think of it, this could also be a compliment as that means there are too many quality videos that are worthy of being downloaded. There is a Labor day sale going on right now and at $10 for a month for the whole network, that is a deal I could not refuse. 09-05-21  06:51pm Replies (0) Review 169 Transfixed (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: The best transsexual site for those that want to see transsexuals with women. It’s a newer site, all the scenes have up to 4K downloads. Only 31 scenes currently, 4 more in the Transgressive series and the updates are twice per month. The highest production values I have seen on a transsexual site. Take your choice, the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. Truly defining site in that sense. Videos and photos can be downloaded. Cons: The small size is the most noticeable, but it is a newer site and is becoming consistent with the updates. Some camerawork gets lost when there are more than two people in the scene. That can be a problem when the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. Bottom Line: The best way to start this is with my last con. It is also one of the pros in direct relation. The transsexuals performing on this site are as pretty as any I have seen. You know you are watching pretty transsexuals when you have to stream the video before downloading, just to see which ones are the transsexuals and which ones are the females. There is one with well-known pornstar Liv Revamped and she even gets lost in the blurring of gender lines. One of the transsexuals in that scene is one of the few transsexual models I know by name, Jessy Dubai. At first glance, the preview screens for these scenes look like lesbian scenes. I don’t think it’s offensive to say, I have watched scenes from this site and been surprised to see one is a female, that one is a transsexual. Very impressive and there are the production values. It is one of the weaknesses of the transsexual genre. A lot of the transsexual scenes have no story. There is little dialogue, and the scenes are just plain. It makes me feel like the selling point is just the fact it’s a transsexual. The scenes on Transfixed are often in the 40+ minute range, with some even being over an hour. There is a star power in these scenes that I don’t see much on transsexual sites. One of my favorite scenes features one of the most popular female models in porn – Adriana Chechik. It also has Natalie Mars, a Milf transsexual and Khloe Kay, who I believe could pass for a woman, but is a transsexual. There is a small series of scenes released as Transfixed but listed as Transgressive Films. There are four of those scenes. Those are transsexuals with men. The Transfixed scenes are more focused on women with transsexuals. The 31 scenes are all available to download in 160p mobile, up to 4K. It is, at least in my experience, the first transsexual site I have seen that goes this far with their scenes (production values, costumes, stories). There are also subtitles available on some scenes. The ones with subtitles have those available in English, Spanish, German, French, Dutch, Italian and Portuguese. They are making this site so good, there isn’t even much to nitpick them about. The scenes are sexy, erotic, interesting, kinky and I would go as far as saying – a site like this, could bring transsexual porn more into the mainstream. I have said before I believe transsexuals with women is the way to the mainstream. As a female, I don’t have a problem with watching transsexuals, but I am sure there are men that wouldn’t feel comfortable watching transsexuals. By putting the transsexuals with women, it still makes the scene a dick going in a pussy. No way would I dare try and explain the psychology of that. I look at it on the most basic level of it maintains a level of familiarity for straight males. The scenes can be downloaded as can small picture zips. Those have 30-50 pictures in each. Those are high resolution photos, but probably wouldn’t be a selling point. They are updating twice per month. The update rate had slowed but has been picking up over the last few months. One thing I will mention that I try to mention in any transsexual review is the types of scenes. The one thing they do not have are solo scenes. Those are usually my favorite, but I do believe that’s because transsexuals with female scenes are so scarce. Once you give me transsexuals with women with this high of production values, a story, the high quality, you have my attention. It’s a site I have the best wishes for. There is definitely a market for transsexuals with women and that market is, women, then becoming women showing their boyfriends or husbands the porn they like. Instead of it being the husband or boyfriend showing their wife or girlfriend the porn they like. I see a lot of tags on hardcore scenes that say, “female friendly”. These scenes, as transsexual scenes, should have a tag that says, “male friendly”. It would score even higher if they had even 50-60 scenes total. I have watched each and every scene from this site more than a few times each. I will end by saying I nearly listed the Transgressive scenes as a con. Those feel like they’re messing with a good thing they have going with the Transfixed scenes. I can see how it could all come together in the future. There are a few sites now that do that with straight male, straight female, transsexual. If that’s the angle, I believe they could pull it off. 02-09-22  06:44am Replies (0) Review 170 True Anal (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The biller is Epoch Updates once a week and there are more than 260 videos Uses a lot of warmup and lube to get the models ready Cons: There are no photos You get only this one site when you join and that's not clear when you join. I don’t like the clothes on the models Very little variety from one scene to the next No 4K downloads or streaming Bottom Line: It is no secret that most porn is marketed towards men. As a woman I like to see anal sex, but prefer when it is done where the female models enjoy it as much as the men. True Anal is a site where there are many scenes that I can relate to, but not really that I can point out as outstanding. The two with Jynx Maze are probably the best on the site. There was initial disappointment -- I clicked to join Nympho and it brought up True Anal. At the top of True Anal there is a tab for sites. One is Nympho, one is Swallowed, one is All Anal and one is Anal Only. I'm not above admitting a mistake, but when you show "sites" on the join page, maybe it's just me, I think those sites come with a membership. Maybe I wouldn't have thought that if their advertising was correct. It clearly says "6 new updates per month". True Anal had 3 updates in July, 0 in June, and 6 in all the previous months. That made me think with only 3 updates over June and July or 25% of what they advertised and had established as their normal of 6 updates per month, the other 4 sites listed on the join page came with the site and that's where the other "updates" were coming from. They can take the blame for having their other sites listed on the join page or for only having 3 updates over 2 months, on a site that averages 6 updates per month. I also wouldn't have just joined this site. I was more interested in Nympho. Once I joined, the other sites required separate, paid memberships to access. I do think it's manipulation. The sites when listed in the guest area just drop down from the menu. Once in the member area the "sites" tab is gone and replaced with a banner that says "join all of our sites for a low price!" Shouldn't that be more clear on the join page instead of showing you the other 4 sites? The director and male model is Mike Adriano. He is good looking, big but not the biggest stunt cock in porn and tries to make the models enjoy the scenes. The scenes start with an interview, where the models talk about how much they like anal sex and how much they are looking forward to working with Mike. He listens attentively and asks the questions. Most porn interviews on other sites seem superficial and a bit unbelievable, but these on the site seem a lot better. It sounds like two friends just talking. He gives them a lot of warm up stimulation both manually and anilingual, not really common in porn. He uses lots of lube, which looks like it makes the scenes easy for the models. Sometimes the lube is applied too much and the model’s butts glisten in the bright sunlight. Most cumshots I saw were internal, which to me is a bit of a disappointment. In some scenes, he pulls out and aims at her gaping butt. By far I liked those better. In some scenes she pushes his cum out. In some others she pushes it onto a spoon or cup and drinks it. For me, that is pushing the boundaries of sexy into a bit extreme visuals that I was not so comfortable with. The sex was reasonably rhythmic and not as forceful as some anal I have seen on other sites. The women are not wincing from discomfort and look quite believably turned on. The site is good sized with more than 260 scenes, but there are no additional sites that come with your membership. Instead, you are offered a discount for some others that look interesting. You also don’t get any pictures, but I don’t care about that. The scenes are basically a formula that works for you or it does not. The scenes are very similar and the set is the same. It looks like it is his house and often his backyard and reminds me of California. The models wear clothes that do nothing for me, just what you have seen on a gonzo type site for the past few years. Searching is not so great and there are far too few tags. There is no advanced search. Being Americans, I would have expected a few more that were Black or Asian or Latina, but most are not. They are mostly quite pretty, but are mostly the standard look of many porn models in older porn of a few years ago. There is quite a bit of makeup and hardware. I don't mind a few tattoos, but must add that many models have them. I didn't like much about this site. 08-10-21  03:22am Replies (0) Review 171 Trystan Bull (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny. These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn. It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited. Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like. Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing. Cons: There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex. Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes. Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore? Bottom Line: The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look. The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher. There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those. The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves. I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them. I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described. 12-08-21  02:28am Replies (0) Review 172 TS Playground (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: High quality transsexual site that makes joining Evil Angel more likely. 921 scenes with a new update every 5 days. Ran by Gamma, has all the video download options you would expect starting at 160p up to 4K, easy join and cancellation too. A lot of solo scenes, but see con Pictures included and can be downloaded. Cons: When I use their filter for “solo” it only shows 23 solo scenes on the site. Just looking at the site, I can count over 50 on the first page of the site. That I’ve found, they do not have any transsexual with women scenes. For some reason, I like bi and gay scenes, but don’t like the transsexual with men scenes. You won’t find a story in these scenes even if you make one up, it will disappear. Bottom Line: I read a few reviews about this site and another transsexual site on Evil Angel called Transsexual Angel which has over 1,200 scenes. That’s a combined 2,000+ scenes. Most of the content on Evil Angel does not appeal to me even if I have had a few drinks. I do, however, like transsexual solo and transsexual with women. The scenes do not offer a lot to work with. There are solo scenes and there are transsexual with males scenes. The solo scenes are not going to expand your appreciation for theatrical art. The scenes show the transsexual lightly teasing. I do think there is a humor factor since some of the transsexual models don’t seem to know they are on a site with transsexual in the name. They tease around like they are going to surprise you when their penis flips out of their panties.They then masturbate, cum and the scene is over. The scenes with transsexuals with men are not much deeper. It’s a transsexual having sex with a man with no story and they cum and it’s over. For me, I enjoy the solo scenes and don’t mind that they go by fast. I do think there should be a mention about the looks. Most of these transsexuals could pass as women. I haven’t seen many ladyboys or the smaller, usually Asian transsexuals, but outside of a few, these transsexuals are made up enough and have the right demeanor to pass as women. The site is on Evil Angel’s network and is owned by Gamma. That is a positive in my eyes. The billing is easy, the cancellation could be a little easier (just requires more info than other billers) and the features are very typical of the other Gamma sites. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p, 360p, 240p and 160p. I have seen a few scenes with 4K, but it is not very common. The picture sets are not what you get from sites that focus on pictures, but they are downloadable in zips as well. There is a listed 300GB download limit per day, but I’m almost positive I’ll probably not hit that in a month. The Transsexual Angel site does have less solo scenes and does have scenes with transsexuals having sex with women. They also have added a new site called Pansexual X that goes into transsexual, bisexual men and those maybe interested in these transsexual sites would be interested in it too. I don’t get much out of the Evil Angel membership except these transsexual and bisexual scenes. It’s a little more hardcore than my tastes allow me to bite into. I do recommend joining for the transsexual and bisexual content if you are into those. This is a site with a large amount of those genres and are downloadable in high quality. 07-14-21  07:35am Replies (0) Review 173 Ultra Films (0) 97.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The fourth site included when you join the Wow Girls network. A person could argue that any of these sites are the best of the four. With over 400 videos and around 1,000 photo sets it looks like this site just replaced the updates on Wow Porn. Updates with 3 videos per week and 5 photo sets per week. Because the site is newer (late 2017 when launched), those of you who love the high technical quality are going to be very pleased with this site. The site, though “separate” from the Wow network works exactly the same as the Wow sites and is very easy to use. One of the few groups of sites I would join for a year. Cons: This is going to be the most difficult part of the review. I am going to say they need more ethnic diversity in the models. They could integrate Ultra Films with the Wow network, as it is, you not only have to sign-in with a different password, you also have to choose a different screenname. Bottom Line: This site separates itself is technical quality. Every single video on the site has 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. That’s over 400 videos. The option to download with 60 frames per second instead of 30 frames per second is available on close to 390 of the scenes. Unless you’re looking for the 6K videos, there is nothing possible to even complain about on Ultra Films. They are giving you the highest quality industry-standard downloads with the option of 30 or 60 frames per second on 95% of the scenes. Usually one of the easiest cons to use on any site is “the older content is not of as high quality”, can’t do that on Ultra Films. They have 151 models on Ultra Films and nearly all are very attractive. There are hardcore scenes that, at least to me, seem more hardcore than the ones on the Wow sites. The update schedule is excellent with 3 videos and 5 photo sets per week. I feel like sending them an email and asking if they could at least screw something up. You really could complain about the model diversity. I even took the time to look through the 151 models just to give an idea of what I’m “complaining” about. I’m going to say 12 of the 151 could maybe pass as non “white” and it would be pushing it on all 12 of them. One of the ones I know is on here is Apolonia Lapiedra and I do know she is from Spain. That’s as ethnically diverse as you’re going to get on this site. The other complaint about Ultra Films not being integrated into the Wow network, actually has an advantage. On the Wow network you really can’t search the models down to one of the three sites. It shows models from all 3 sites. On Ultra Films, the model list just shows the models on Ultra Films. I believe, besides the technical quality, the focus on their top models really helps Ultra Films. Stefanie Moon who seems to be very popular has 11 videos and 19 photo sets just on Ultra Films. You can even look at the total numbers from the site compared to the amount of models and see what I mean. There are roughly 1,500 videos and photo sets combined, there are only 151 models, that’s an average of 10 videos/photo sets per model, but it’s not that high. There are several popular models who only have 3 videos and 3 photo sets. They do have a group that’s more in that range of 20+ videos/photo sets combined. I prefer that and it was something I believe made me lose some interest in Nubiles. I like seeing a lot of content of each model instead of seeing a lot of models with just a little content of each. This review puts me in a hard situation of trying to figure out which of these four sites deserves the highest score. Quantity is never going to be the deciding factor for me. Even if I had the time and hard drive space, I do not and would not want a site’s entire collection of content on my PC. It makes me wonder if Ultra Films is the best of these for me. It’s probably going to lead me to tying two and the other two will just be a point or two less. I think if you’re a porn fan and you haven’t tried this network out you don’t know what you’re missing. 08-10-21  03:57am Replies (0) Review 174 VIPissy (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Big, exclusive fetish site. Over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and lots of sex and orgasms. Up to 4K downloads and HD downloads. Photos are clear and downloadable. No download limits in new weekly updates. Cons: Needs more focus on showing and explaining the pissing fetish. It’s much more complex than porn makes it seem to be. Some scenes are disappointing just because the fetish seems to get forgotten. Bottom Line: I remember when I first talked to a pee fetishist. I was surprised to know that sound is a major part of the fetish. I didn’t say I’m going to explain it, but now that you know, it does make you question why sites like this one don’t point out the sound part. I also found out there’s a mixture of fetishists that cannot agree on their favorite part. Some like the model to be nude with legs spread while pissing, while others want her wearing pants that show the pee soaking the pants. If none of this sounds interesting do not worry. I also don’t think any of that sounds interesting or arousing, but I really enjoyed this site. The site has over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and hardcore sex, usually all in the same scene. It’s straightforward sex that aims to focus on the woman’s lower half of her body. I have noticed pissing fetishists also often like legs, hose and feet porn too. You will see those in these scenes. Which makes sense since the pee runs down the legs. The sex is hardcore and as good as any site. And other than the focus on pissing for a few seconds in each scene, the porn is just a lot like any other porn. That’s why the pissing adds or subtracts to the content. For me, it adds to the content. Peeing is a private act that has been a fetish for hundreds of years due to the taboo of the act. It also is a fetish that works with “porn” since it focuses on the pussy. It seems to be one of the most perfect fetishes for showcasing porn sex in it. The newer videos have 4K downloads and the videos have HD 1080p and 720p downloads as well. The pictures are downloadable in zip packs. I did make a deduction for the lack of explanatory scenes. It seems like it would be easier for these fetish-type sites to make 8-10 videos that focus on showing the different arousal points of the fetish. As it is, I attempt to figure out the parts that arouse me more than the other parts. There could be more explanation about the different arousals based on the gender that is pissing, as example. I believe it would add immense value to the porn to understand the hows and whys of the fetish. They do everything else well enough. It’s a good value even by itself with no bonus content. 11-26-22  05:55pm Replies (0) Review 175 Viv Thomas (0) 100.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: This is a re-review of Viv Thomas, which I reviewed just about a year ago. I’m still a member on it.. In my opinion, the prettiest models on any pornsite, sure, most of the models are on other sites too, but Viv Thomas’ site has magic other sites don’t have. There are 3,617 photo sets to download and 2,424 videos to download. There are 1,217 models. The downloadable videos are unlimited and newer ones have 4K. It’s a Met-Art Network site so it has the navigation, usability and all the bells and whistles The most passionate lesbian scenes I have ever viewed. Cons: I have read complaints in the scene comments about old scenes being removed. It has kept me hostage as a member for over a year. I just can’t talk myself into canceling. Bottom Line: It’s not uncommon for us to re-review favorite sites, but this re-review was brought on by me staying as a member way longer than I thought I would. I think that’s the very biggest compliment to a site. Viv Thomas has always been a name in porn that I have been drawn to. I used to look up his videos on tube sites. Back then, I didn’t even know this site existed. I have always felt like Vivid was the only studio that could make porn as good as Viv Thomas. I am speaking solely on the lesbian genre. The site has all the technical numbers you could ever want. There are 2,424 videos and the newer ones can be downloaded in 4K resolution, even though I do only download in 720 and 1080. The picture sets are spectacular with 5700x3700 resolution on the large zip filed pictures. There’s a purpose with every photo. If you flip through them you can watch the women in motion. There are roughly 5-6 updates per week. During my second month of membership, I decided to keep letting the subscription recur and that was over 10 months ago. I just didn’t think there was a site that could impress me that much and keep my attention on it. But Viv Thomas has Why did I list the models looks as a pro when they are on other sites? Viv Thomas site gets a different version of the models. They are more feminine, sexier, less-robotic and look like everyone of them is competing to have the best, sexiest, hottest scene on Viv’s site. I have been buying and collecting porn long enough to know the older scenes are the best. Now a current producer/director on Viv Thomas, retired model Sandra Shine – has scenes on Viv Thomas, of her as the star that blow away newer scenes on any site. There are years, not a handful of updates, that every scene is a little hotter than the previous one. Clothed women, touching each other, kissing, tongues touching, until the clothes seemingly just melts off their bodies. Maybe it is the sign of the times in porn? The Viv Thomas new scenes are very good and, in my opinion, as good as any lesbian site’s scenes, but it’s those older scenes you have to watch. It doesn’t even matter if you like the models. You won’t see this much heat in a scene on any other site. Maybe you can, but I sure can’t. The site is owned or managed by Met-Art now and you can see that. The videos/films are in a tab, the photos are in a tab and the model list is in a tab. It’s that simple and it’s another reason I love this site. I did join Viv Thomas a long time ago. It had a video site and a photo site back then. Having all this content on one easy to use site makes me not want to cancel! I do think it’s humorous to read the comments on the different scenes. You will always have that one guy that says all they need is a dick in the scene. That’s because he is that turned on by the scene! I have seen some of the male/female Viv Thomas scenes from the late 90s and they are good, but I don’t see the removal of those as anything to be that upset about. It looks like Met-Art decided to promote Viv Thomas’ lesbian scenes and who could possibly argue with their decision? In my now 14 months of membership, I could stop joining other sites and just join Viv Thomas. It’s that good . The scenes are not only believable, but are so hot they become nearly unbelievable. A site like this one could hurt my viewing of other porn. I want to see the models looking like they are willing to tear their paycheck up. Scenes that are that good are very rare, but I could list over 100 from Viv Thomas that gave me that feeling. Combine that quality with the technical aspects and I have what is my perfect site. 02-13-24  09:57pm Replies (1) Shown : 151-175 of 187 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.4 seconds.