| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Oldje
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There is no pun intended when I say Oldje passes the test of time.
Premium quality porn in the old and young niche.
All videos are downloadable and the lowest quality is 720p. Most have 1080p and the newer scenes have 4K.
Three sites are included: Class Nudes, Class 3some and Class Blowjobs.
The scenes are genuinely fun.
I’m guessing because of the possible limitations the males have, there’s not a lot of directing going on and it makes the content seem more authentic. |
| Cons: |
My biggest con is I would rather have Oldje 3Some as a bonus site than the three Class sites.
There probably should be more user options, but being a longtime porn user, those aren’t that important to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
Oldje really does pass the test of time. It’s not easy or that common for any pornsite to do that these days. I can’t count the number of times I’ve throught a site was the best of its class, only to go back and view the content, a few months later and think, “Ok, it’s good, but not as great as I originally thought.” Oldje doesn’t have that problem. It is as good as I remember it being.
The scenes do try and include something of a story, but how much story do these types of scenes need? You have a senior citizen male with at least one cute, pretty, young woman, likely under 30. I think the scene happening is the story or the dream of the older man – and possibly even the naughty dream of the young woman. The only thing that could hurt these scenes would be terrible performances by either male or female, but I haven’t even seen a bad performance from any of the models of either gender. Oldje is doing something right and you can see it in the performance quality. I think the females know and understand the possible limitations the males may have and the female can make that less clear to the viewing audience. A novel idea, let the female control the performance in a porn scene!
This site has very high quality videos. It’s not as common in this niche as it is in Lesbian, Hardcore or even Pro Amateur. Oldje doesn’t have any of those old scenes that make you say, “The older content is poor quality”. All videos are downloadable and the lowest quality is 720p. Up until a year or so ago, I didn’t download anything over 720p due to space concerns. You also will see a lot of 1080p file downloads of the videos and there are even 4K downloads.
The models attractiveness is going to be subjective. The males are older, often chubby, and wouldn’t fit in a scene on most popular pornsites. The females look similar to what you will find on most Euro sites. Slim to medium build, very young looking and often, very excitable. I’m going to guess they have the dreams or fantasies of being able to turn on an older man enough for him to fully perform and finish sexually. I’m even going to say I believe it’s why these scenes are so good. There’s a chemistry you’re not usually thinking about in porn. I’m sure the older men want to be able to turn on these younger women to be able to feel like they still have it and the females are likely thinking the older male has had quite a few sexy women in their life and want to be the one or one of the ones he remembers most.
My only con that I believe is a valid complaint is Oldje has a sister site called Oldje 3Some, it’s really good though small. The sites that come with an Oldje subscription, Class Nudes, Class Blowjobs and Class 3Some, are good, not great sites and I personally would rather have Oldje 3Some, instead, if you want Oldje 3Some, you have to join it in a different subscription from Oldje. If the two Oldje sites were paired together, it would be a near perfect site. As it is, Oldje is still the best young and old niche site I’ve been a member of. |
|
06-11-24 08:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Only Teen Blowjobs
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
You get all five sites of the Blowpass Network
Pornusers has a discount
Lots of very pretty teens
Huge site with 729 videos and photosets
Older men/younger women are common
4K is available on the newest videos |
| Cons: |
Still getting into repetitive.
Do the women not want more in the scenes? |
| Bottom Line: |
Some of the most common porn scenes are ones where a newcomer gives a blowjob to a lucky guy. Every day, women show up at porn studios hoping for a chance to become the next big star. Many get the chance to try their skills on a site like this. You get a lot of fresh faces that have first and in some cases, even their only scenes here. For some they may make a few more videos, but for many they get the honor of being on the site that advertises itself as “The freshest teens in porn”.
The site tries to capitalize on that in a few ways. One is dressing them in a way that creates a feeling of youth. The site says only 18 and 19 year olds. I think these may not all be teens and some look like they are in their twenties. You see them in cut off shorts very often, some are done up in pigtails and some wear revealing tops that seem like an invitation for sex.
To play up the youth factor, they do things we think of as young. They eat cereal, play video games, use cell phones and seem to be someone you could possibly know. They need to borrow a car or money, get help with homework, get out of trouble they caused, do homework with a boyfriend, do babysitting , text while sucking, need their computer fixed , take a selfie while sucking, and the list grows as do the guys. In one scene that I loved, Kenzie Reeves is a cam girl and her boyfriend walks in. A customer gives a tip to give her boyfriend a blowjob on cam. Scenes like this keep the site fresh and modern. It feels like today.
One of the fetishes here is a family one. Her partner is her stepdad or her stepbrother. A great scene I loved had Sloan Harper and Logan Long paired. She is his stepsister and a lesbian, to make things complicated. She owes him fifty dollars and the guy slowly and teasingly “negotiate” a blow job as payment. By the end she is fingering herself to an orgasm as her comes on her. Yikes, that was hot. She is with her father’s friend in some cases. In a few scenes, she even gets revenge on her ex-boyfriend. No matter how they get to the sex, her guy is a little older by a few years. In most of the scenes, I think the age difference is about five to ten years.
Being American models, the models are mostly white, but also Asian, Latinas and black. I loved scenes with the Asian women as I think they give the best blow jobs on camera, maybe in real life too. Lulu Chu is simply great in a scene where she is doing homework with her boyfriend and they take a break. In another she wants some cereal but her boyfriend drank the milk. She knows where she can get some more without a trip to the store.
The guys are ok, but not the biggest or the best. They are just there and that is not really a criticism as the ladies are and should be the stars. They have the skills in many cases and in others they don’t, but that natural enthusiasm kicks in. Some of them for sure use up a whole day’s worth of calories. Who needs the gym to stay fit if your boyfriend wants a blowjob?
With a large archive of 729 videos and photosets, there is plenty to see here. This year there has been only on new update, but December had three. You also get three other blowjob sites as well as immoral Live, a site that is one of my all time favorites. |
|
02-09-22 06:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of naked men being groped, sucked and fucked by "stranger" women.
As a past member, it is nice to see their additions of multiple camera angles to see different views of the action and different models.
Have changed nearly all scenes to a new style, combining what used to be 2-3 part scenes into 1 and scenes over the last year have 4 different camera angles.
That random drunk woman you know isn't a porn star that grabs two of the guys and sticks their dicks in her mouth.
Most of the guys are attractive.
The amateurs in the crowd -- in most cases -- look like real amateurs. |
| Cons: |
The editing needs to be improved. Having to watch the scene from 4 different cameras gives it a "genuine" feel, but they no problem getting every cumshot into the scene.
The porn girls in the scenes are either too obvious by their looks or they have yellow bands on their arms letting the guys know which are the women to do the most with.
In a few words -- the scenes are too hectic.
Same venues. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had reviewed this site 10 years ago it would have been a mid-90s. It was different and seemed to be aimed at women viewers. The scenes often lasted too long, but they were enjoyable. I think the new format with 4 camera views is good if there are parts you really want to see. If the scene is not a good one, the 4 camera view makes it 4 times worse.
I don't know if the DVD site Videoez had anything to do with the change in the way the scenes are now laid out, but at one time, you could download a lot of these scenes from Videoez in "Best of" compilations. That is how they have done the older scenes on here. They have taken the best of their previous 90 minute scenes and lowered them to 30 minutes.
They have photos and screencaps which I don't remember them having in the past. The photos show a lot of what you don't see in the videos.
The scenes have removed most of the pre-action stripping and dancing by the males -- which is a plus. I still have some of the scenes from 7 years ago and the names are much different. Instead of the name just being the date and city of the scene, they are now titled like "Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol. 17".
Every video I have downloaded has a 1080p option, 720p and 480p option.
The hectic parts are not as bad as they used to be, but they are still using the same venues. The scenes play out the same and can be somewhat repetitive.
I think the niche is intriguing and could be better with some work on the amount of men and amount of "audience". A hundred women screaming and cheering on one model while music is blasting is distracting and frustrating.
It's hard to say much about the amount of content. It looks like it has dropped, but where they have combined scenes, the drop in quantity is most likely because of the combining.
The more I have watched these scenes I am starting to think these would be just as good for men -- maybe better -- than for women. I have been to three bachelorette parties, but never experienced anything like this. Maybe the fantasy is for a male viewer to think this is what goes on at the bachelorette parties their wife goes to?
I'm stuck in the middle on this one. I want it to be one of my favorite sites, but I like the videos I have from the past as much or more than these.
It's a good site by itself that is helped a lot by being in the Tainster network. My score would be a little lower if not for the pictures as they add a lot to the scenes. Good site in a little represented niche. |
|
09-10-19 01:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An oddly-addictive network that has had me as a member multiple times over the last few years.
Hardcore, lesbian and group sex. The group sex is the selling point for me.
Comes with 15 other sites.
Videos and pictures are downloadable and unlimited on downloads.
Weekly updates.
Down to Earth, women next door types. |
| Cons: |
I believe the looks of the models could be a con for some. Though not promoted as an alternative site, the women often dress alternatively and are tattooed.
No 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
Pegas Productions has a very underrated network on their hands. I decided to re-review it after I noticed I scored it only 77 on my previous review of it. The word underrated feels right now, but I could easily see some people using underwhelming. It’s mosly based on the looks of the women. You’re not going to see models that look like models. There’s not much glamour. I do believe that merges a fine line between believable hardcore and realistic hardcore. It always seemed a little bipolar to me to have those perfect 10 models posing then moments later having a dual penetration scene. You won’t see that on Pegas. Most of the women look like and act like they’re as much into the scenes as the men are.
This network could be a shining example of why we shouldn’t review a site or network after just one month of membership. I scored it a 77, but have been a member of it for four other memberships. I have warmed up to the content. I do believe it’s a perfect show of the models looks aren’t going to sell you on the network. It took me a little time and getting used to their shooting or filming style.
The video quality is excellent, but no 4K. There are 720p and 1080p downloads plus the photos are downloadable. The site is nearing 1,000 scenes and over 500 photo sets. Add to those the 15 other sites and you can see there’s a lot of content to keep you occupied and busy.
Of the other sites, I recommend these:
Kinky Frenchies, Fun Sized Teens, Inked Gurlz and Fresh and Innocent. Just like the overall content, it takes a little time to warm up to the different genres and niches, so give it some time. As an entire network, this is comparable to all the big and known networks. The added bonus is you haven’t seen more than a few of these models before and maybe, if like me, I’ve never seen these models on other sites. That goes into taking some time to warm up to the content. You start to realize this content is relatively obscure.
The navigation could be improved, but I also believe that’s subjective. It’s just not as easy to use as other similar networks. I found myself back-clicking several times which is never a good sign. It’s a good network and one I consider one of my favorites now as can be seen by the 13 point boost in my score. |
|
11-26-22 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
130
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Going directly to the site shows no dates, but the first one posted is Redhead in the Forest. I want to say that might be newer. The same male and female have a re-creation of Lil' Red Riding Hood where the guy is dressed up like the big, bad wolf. That scene was released as a "bonus" scene recently. The Redhead in the Forest looks like after they took their costumes off. The next listed one is Kendra Fucked at a Sex Party, which doesn't look like outside, they are on a bed. The one before it was Jesse Storm Fucked on the Patio and the one before it was Highway to Fuck.
|
10-29-19 03:32pm
|
Review
131
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Canadian hardcore porn network that I received an email promo from.
22 sites included, some are very small.
232 models with some of most unique tags I have seen for models.
A little over 750 main scenes, around 280 bonus scenes.
Some of the scenes have photos and they are downloadable, but contain 20-25 photos in the ones I've looked at.
I think there's a theme or story connecting one scene to another and it's why there are bonus scenes, but the navigation isn't helping me out any. |
| Cons: |
Kind of heavy on the ads. There's a large one at the top, one on the bottom of the main page. Once inside the videos or updates page, there's a large one right in the middle of the content.
There is a listing for bonus sites. It is in French with no English option and I would rather not risk signing in with my login details since I don't know what it says.
Got me with a pre-checked sign-up to a site I had never heard of and that was in all French. I was able to cancel it instantly and only lost $2.95 for it, but what is it with the French-only sites? |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the sites I joined in the past since me a special promo for this Pegas Productions network and it looked interesting.
And it is interesting. The models from the best I can tell are amateurs. The sites or categories included are:
3 Way Porn, Banging Family, Blow Me POV, Chic and Chix, Cutie Pussies, Fun Size Teens, Fresh and Innocent, Inked Gurlz, JizzOrama, Kummalot, Let's Fuck Outside, Lezzie BFF, Lust Eden, Nasty Rookies, Samantha Ardente, Sexy Knockers, Shake the Snake, Sly Masseur, Spice My Sex Life, Straight in the Ass and TranniesRus.
I can't figure out if each site has a story going on from scene to scene or if these are DVDs that are split into parts or what.
Their site Inked Gurlz reminds me a lot of Burning Angel and AltErotica.
The rest of the sites seem just like each one is just a niche and they're calling it a site. The site has been around for over 10 years, but only has around 800 scenes.
I would rate most of the scenes as average scenes. Most of the women look like amateurs and are mostly cute types. The guys look like professional wrestlers.
I watched some of the more specific scenes like, "Shit! My Stepdaughter is a stripper!" The scene starts with the stepdad in the stepdaughter's room looking in her nightstand. He finds sparkly, shiny clothes and says, "Shit! My daughter-in-law is a stripper!" That's not a typo or mistake by me. The scene says "stepdaughter", the script of the scene is "daughter-in-law". The father-in-law, who looks as young as the daughter-in-law, walks around mumbling about wait until my son finds out about this. The daughter-in-law comes in, seduces him and has sex with him.
That is really poor production standards. First, the mistake with the naming of the scene and role of the female. Then, the dad talking about how upset his son is going to be, has sex with her and she's not even attractive.
It's a disappointing site for me. The older videos are in poor quality even though it says they are HD. As mentioned, several options take you to pages in French, they got me with a cross sale that I still haven't seen and it was of a movie site in French. I found a few scenes I liked. The newer ones are 1080p. The bonus scenes from watching a few look to be BTS and nearly all dialogue is in French. There is a cameraman talking in most of these scenes. The actors in the scene are talking, laughing and I'm wondering what they're even saying.
Those unique tags for the models might even explain some of the frustration. Here is how they have their models tagged and separated - Fruity & Spicy, Light and Flexible, Young and Delicate, Bodied and Curvy, Aromatic and Alluring, Vibrant and Zesty. It is a porn site or a coffee and pastry house?
I think it could be a good site, but as it is, it's only okay. |
|
10-29-19 01:22am
Replies (3)
|
Review
132
|
Perv Therapy
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No niche has been more overlooked in porn than mental therapy.
Around 40 scenes.
Includes access to 4 other sites.
*Warning Pro* My membership included downloads. I believe it depends on how you join (email, promo, directly).
Up to 4K downloads on the videos. Also includes HD downloads,
Easy cancel through Epoch |
| Cons: |
I expected cheesy plotlines, but instead received cheesy and corny.
Possibly have to abide by certain standards due to the sensitive nature of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine my excitement when I saw a porn site based on mental therapy. I then came back to reality and realized there are so many rules and regulations around the field it would likely be very limited in what all it covers. I have been working in the mental sciences for over 10 years and there has been more than one case of uncomfortable sexual tension in my office and nearly every therapist will tell you the same. There’s something about getting people to open up and talk about emotions that often leads right into sex.
With that said – this is porn and it’s made by the people at Team Skeet. That comes with some big positives like extremely high quality videos and pictures, but you will note my warning pro. I joined with no promo and am sure I paid a little more, but did receive downloading ability. The videos are downloadable up to 4K, but I only download the 720p or 1080p files. The videos are clear and well-lighted. That could have been a problem as some therapists keep their offices dark. The pictures are high quality and a nice, medium lighting/color.
You also receive access to these sites: This Girl Sucks, Teeny Black, CFNM Teens and My Babysitter’s Club. Each of those are good sites with pretty models and mostly cute and playful themes. I do believe each of those sites have been standalone sites before, but the updates have now either stopped or are rare. It is a good way to get access to these other sites.
What can you do with a perverted therapist site? Not a lot. More times than not, in real life, it’s the patient not the therapist that loses control of their emotions. Most of these scenes show the “mentally superior” therapist using their mental superiority to convince the younger patient to have sex with them. Not a complete miss since it is the first time I’ve seen porn try the therapy genre, but it’s not a hit, either. The scenes are reminiscent of most older/younger porn scenes. There’s no real (would be funny) seduction through therapy or even related to therapy. Still, good try and would like to see where they take this idea.
That can be a problem for this porn company. They have some really good ideas, but seem to be quick to give up on their ideas. This one is entertaining enough to keep an eye on it. The other 4 sites are worth mentioning for what they are – bonus add-on sites. I would recommend it to anyone that is interested in any of the included sites. |
|
11-28-22 02:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Petite HD Porn
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Petite models in hardcore male/female and lesbian scenes.
221 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
All content is high quality with up to 1080p offered on all videos.
Joining and canceling is easy with CCBill.
Navigation is simple, but not without problems. |
| Cons: |
Being a petite woman, I enjoy the petite niche in porn, but the problems I mentioned in the pros is starting to make this site confusing.
Advertisements that aren’t terribly obtrusive, but are still there.
Updates come, but with the aforementioned confusion it can make the updates confusing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has several positives going for it. The models are cute and pretty. The lesbian scenes are pretty good. The male/female scenes are hit or miss. The video quality is a plus unless you want 4K. The photo sets are very good and can be downloaded in zips. There is one problem that showed up over the last few months. They (Petite HD Porn) decided to number their scenes as seasons and episodes, similar to a television show. One scene will be S(season): 20, E(pisode): 4, the next release S20, E5. It always seems like a good idea until this happens. Of the newest 5 releases, two are listed as “New Season”. One is S22 E1 (sounds like a new season). The other, that is more recently released is S2 E1. And it’s listed as a new season just like season 22 is listed as a new season. Is the content being recycled? The 3 newest updates include two from season 2. This group of sites is not known for this kind of sloppiness.
The site is still a good site. Some of the male/female seasons are very good, as good as you will see on more known hardcore sites. The pretty models are usually into the sex, but if you’re here for a story there’s not much going on there. Why name the scenes, give them seasons and episodes then leave the story off?
There are 221 scenes, the updates are not even close to consistent. Currently, there was an update last on June 24, then June 21, before that was May 16, before that was March 14 and before that one -- February 9th. The last time I was a member here they were updating once a week during the peak of Covid. It’s one of those sites that you may enjoy, but you’re not going to be missing anything by skipping it. It does carry over the feeling that Nubiles tried too hard to do too much with a network to couple with Nubiles.net (which wasn’t needed) and then the premium standalone sites and a second network. The video quality is good with up to 1080p downloads. The photos and downloadable zips are there. It comes with a 15 or 16 site network, I really believe that’s an 18 site network, but I can’t remember the names of the other sites they don’t list. It’s at least cheap and uses CCBill for easy cancellation. The cross-sales when I joined were not checked.
It just feels like they could do a lot more with this site and their entire group of sites and networks and they may be as long as you join all the sites separately and pay a separate price for each. Just by itself, I couldn’t recommend this site, as a part of the Nubiles Porn network it’s worth taking a look at it. |
|
07-14-21 02:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
Pink Label
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites. |
| Cons: |
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site. |
|
06-08-22 03:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Porn World
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s the DDF network rebranded and complicated
Downloads are included in the price
The TBP discount is great!
It navigates like a complicated version of DDF Network, you get used to it
The quality is top notch
House of Taboo content is here
Also includes Legal Porno scenes |
| Cons: |
The navigation earns a spot here too. At first, it took me at least two weeks to get used to the navigation.
The Legal Porno content requires tokens |
| Bottom Line: |
DDF was one of my all-time favorite networks. It was one of the first hardcore pornsites I joined. But back then, I only joined 1byDay and paid a premium price for the one site. All the 1byDay content is available on Porn World and I have to say, it’s still as good as I remember.
I want to say all the DDF content is here, but I can’t say that. There is a lot of it. Around 15,000 scenes. I do believe a few points should be taken off the score for the more complicated site, Porn World’s navigation. It’s not a dealbreaker, not even close. But I was fairly frustrated the first few times I logged in and searched directly for a scene I remembered, only to not find what I was looking for. With that said, a little time and a lot of paying attention has made the navigation good, not great.
The DDF sites I remember the most were: OnebyDay, Hot Legs and Feet, Only Blowjob and DDF Busty. The DDF network, in its early days, was my pick for the best value in porn. It’s still up there and the TBP $14.95 discount makes it even better. It advertises as $44.95 to me.
The videos and picture quality are still in-line with the DDF standards and the models are gorgeous, even still a little glamorous as DDF was known for. There are still updates as well and with a 15,000+ scene catalog, it’s one of the most impressive networks you will see.
Legal Porno also has their content on Porn World and I will admit, there are some scenes from them that caught my eye and made me consider paying for tokens to download. In the past, I probably would have found the Legal Porno content to be frustrating, since it’s taking up space in my vision and not available without paying more for, but enough sites have turned to the pay per view method, it’s just becoming common and I have accepted that.
You receive one of the best mixes of niches and genres with this network. It’s still a show of what a brilliant producer, director and photographer Denys Defrancesco was. His work is up there with the top names in porn history and even with the frustrating navigation, you at least know you’re going to get great content in your search.
This site also would be good for those that miss the 2000s era of porn.
I will confirm that from the best I can tell, all the House of Taboo content is available on Porn World. DDF stepped so far out of his zone with House of Taboo, but it was easily one of the best BDSM sites on the internet. I have downloaded quite a bit of its content from Porn World and consider that content, alone – to make me happy. It’s worth checking out if you’re into the idea of BDSM but back out when you see the “scary” parts. DDF produced BDSM with class and respect. That’s how I feel about his content. And it’s why this is a very highly recommended join. |
|
07-09-24 12:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
POV Blowjobs
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As far as I am willing to go into the world of messy, rough porn. A large POV blowjob site.
Surprising to me, 674 scenes, remove around 40 if you don’t count behind the scenes.
It’s part of the Evil Angel network. I tried to find a few more sites to review from it, but can’t stomach most of them.
Some really pretty women. Why does that surprise me?
Good video quality with more than half of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads.
Downloadable picture zips, but some of the sets only have 10 or less pictures. |
| Cons: |
This does not remind me of a blowjob site. It’s more like a throat culture site, very messy, harsh, I won’t say degrading since the women seem to enjoy it.
No longer updating, but it is a very large site.
One of my most hated acts in porn: Having the guy cum into a glass for the women to drink it. It reminds me of when Rocky drinks the raw eggs. |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe I pushed every boundary I have with these reviews this month. I tried Anal Acrobats, but couldn’t even make it through the trailers of the videos to review it. This one is typical of Evil Angel and some of it’s not terribly disgusting or offensive, but some of it is. I am going to review it as objectively as I can without bringing too much of my disgust into the review.
The majority of the 674 scenes are one woman with one man and those are not that bad. It’s the scenes with more than one man that I found hard to watch. Maybe I should even say, if you are against very hardcore porn, heavy slobbering, running eyeshadow and eyeliner, gagging noises, you might want to stay away from this site.
This is a legitimate complaint that has nothing to do with the disgusting parts. I don’t see how this is POV. Especially when it’s more than one man. There’s one camera and five men. I’m not even for sure where POV for a blowjob should be recorded from.
The most surprising part to me was how many very attractive women there are on the site. I even saw one scene here with the very pretty Anissa Kate. The scenes are very simplistic. Man gets naked, the woman opens her mouth and the man gives her a throat culture with his penis. I really believe if they spent more time working on making it a true POV site, instead of seeing how close they could come to choking the woman to death, it would be a good site. Which is me being objective. I’m saying if you don’t mind the sounds, the gagging, you might like this site a lot. The part that made me at least suffer through watching the scenes was how much the women seem to enjoy it. There is a little more to the scenes than just blowjobs. Many of the female models masturbate while giving the blowjob. I would even recommend it for those who have favorite mainstream female porn stars. You will be surprised when you see her on this site. |
|
08-11-21 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
137
|
Pretty Dirty
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Story-driven porn that I do believe represented the precursor for the better-known Pure Taboo.
There are 206 scenes. There are no more updates. It has its importance, though.
All scenes have from mobile resolution to 1080p downloads. No 4K.
Generally attractive male and female models. Derrick Pierce is one of my favorite male models and he has several scenes on this site.
It is, in my opinion, more hardcore than Pure Taboo and less reliant on atmosphere.
The site works very well and is easy to use. |
| Cons: |
Less time in the scenes would seem to point to less story, but I believe it’s the less atmosphere that is causing the shorter scenes. The actions show the darker side of this site. I list that as a con because there’s obviously a reason they switched to the style of Pure Taboo, which isn’t as physically dominant. Could be a pro for you, could be a con.
No updates, but I remember a time that I joined Pure Taboo when it first came out. I thought it was going to include Adult Time. It didn’t. It only included Pretty Dirty. It feels like there is a reason they don’t want the Pretty Dirty content grouped with the Pure Taboo content. |
| Bottom Line: |
My feeling here could be a very simple feeling. I believe Pretty Dirty was pushing boundaries that were maybe too risky to push. One thing I haven’t seen talked about with this site is 80 of the 206 scenes are behind the scenes, scenes. You really only get 126 porn scenes. The scenes are generally shorter than on Pure Taboo. There is less lighting and atmosphere in the scenes. It’s going to cause me to feel different emotions towards the scenes. Whereas I believe Pure Taboo creates an uncomfortable setting, then has more standard sex that isn’t that hardcore. Pretty dirty lets the action and sex make you uncomfortable. The part I also notice is the feature type scenes that they seemed to be building their site with. The one that stands out the most is the Indirect Relations series. It is directed by Bree Mills and Craven Moorehead. Two names I am familiar with. The scenes like that one, to me, are where a site like this needs to be at. That scene is very emotional, and I wonder if it crossed lines. If it was too much? It is about a father that was having sex with his daughter which led to his divorce. It’s not stepdaughter. The story grows or sinks into the dad soliciting a prostitute, a drug addict and his daughter, for an orgy. That’s really pushing boundaries. That’s all made worse by the dad being a cop. When you get into a topic that taboo and controversial, you are reliant on the viewer having the open-mind and understanding it’s acting. I believe porn directors and producers should make that clear. Is it their choice to not go that far or are they being limited? I didn’t freak out watching out. I understood that it was fantasy.
With the part being said about the 80 behind the scenes, scenes. You are only getting 126 porn scenes. Most of these scenes are like Pure Taboo except without the atmosphere. I could see people being split 50/50 on which site/style they like better. I think I like Pretty Dirty’s style better. There’s a lot to be said for certain actions in porn need atmosphere, story and build-up, while others need none of those. I don’t know that this hardcore, taboo content needs a lot of stories. The more story there is the more likely holes in the plot starts to develop. I’m not a huge hardcore porn fan. I do really like these scenes.
The models are all very attractive. I even believe that could play a part in my interest in the scenes. This is the main goal I was looking for. Do I see a reason for the content to switch from Pretty Dirty to Pure Taboo? No. Which makes me think it was something out of their control. The taboo types are similar. The sex is similar. The one thing I really notice is the lighting. Pure Taboo is more artistic, while Pretty Dirty is more raw. You do get both sites so you can like one or other better or love both of them. I feel like both sites push some boundaries in 2022. Even though the plots are not that different than porn for 20-40 years ago. I believe the years of constant gonzo porn with no plot has made these scenes more interesting to people. Just don’t forget your imagination when watching these scenes and listening to the plot. This is not really a complaint. There is casting problems here, too. The scene with Derrick Pierce and Aaliyah Love, is one of the sexiest, but worst cast scenes I have seen. Derrick and another man grab Aaliyah and the other man restrains Aaliyah’s husband while Derrick has sex with her. She tries to make it believable that she doesn’t want it, but she is such a cute, spunky model, it just fails on believability. There were 3 parts she smiles and laughs in while her “husband” is trying to fight to get to her to save her. There are scenes on Pure Taboo with the same problem. They’re either going to have to be more playful of sites or stop putting playful actresses in these scenes. It’s definitely worth checking out. |
|
02-09-22 06:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Pride Studios
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay network of 11 sites.
The network averages 3-4 updates per week.
As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models.
The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads.
There are pictures that can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say.
Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn.
The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex.
They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it.
The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn.
Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women.
I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that. |
|
12-08-21 03:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As a huge fan of story-driven porn, I have chosen to pass up on this site before now. The dark, gritty, nature of the scenes are both a pro and con.
The artistic value of these scenes is quite high, but once you go into artistic, you really need to live up to the “title” of the painting, unless you’re going for abstract.
There are 378 scenes. The updates are spaced out, but very consistent. You should expect 5-6 updates per month.
As much as I want to applaud the writing and storytelling in the scenes, this reminds me a lot of older porn plots that I have seen from studios like Vivid. It could be those scenes are so far in the past, now, that a younger generation hasn’t experienced those plots. It is good storytelling for porn.
All video downloads have at least 1080p, with the majority having 4K.
The scenes are long, the quality is high, there’s a story, very attractive models. |
| Cons: |
My number one con is an easy one. A lot of these plots are not even new in porn. The earliest porn I watched had some of these plots. Especially the ones that’s go into religion. There’s stepfamily porn on here. I can’t be as positive about that part of the site as others have been. Now, I have to look at the precursor Pretty Dirty to see if changes were made.
This will be a con I don’t think I have seen in a porn review. Poor casting. If you’re going to have a scene about a psychiatrist, at least make sure the person playing the psychiatrist is not a very well-known porn star |
| Bottom Line: |
This was only my second time joining Adult Time. The first time I was just so overwhelmed with it that I didn’t see a lot of what the network had. I joined the year offer last month. I do find a lot of interest in written erotica. My thoughts before the last few weeks, about Pure Taboo, was that I would either love it or hate it. I don’t hate it. I don’t love it either. They can have all the credit for making a dark, gritty, atmosphere, excellent lighting for the scenes, to set the tone. This site is a good example for why most porn companies don’t try to be this story-driven. If you’re going to have humans playing out the story, they are going to need to be very good actors and actresses. A lot of the actors and actresses in these scenes are well-known. I recognize at least 75% of the names. That is why I didn’t review this site the time I was on it before. I felt like I would be too critical of the site that’s trying to at least give us a story.
There are 378 scenes. The update schedule can be a little confusing. There is 5-7 day gap between some scenes, then they will release two scenes in four days. It works out, currently, to 5-6 scenes per month. I have to say my taste in porn must not be too bad. The best scene I have watched so far is Clinical Trial featuring Danny Mountain and Kira Noir. It just so happened to be nominated for a 2020 best AVN scene. That scene, at its roots, is just another doctor takes advantage of female patient scene which we have seen for years in porn. But it is told in the story of the scene, she is an athlete and I know there were some abuse stories that came out about a sports doctor abusing the young athletes. I think they are leaning on that being the taboo. They are using stories that are either known or are familiar to our brains.
I believe the mood, the lighting, the language, the roughness, adds to the taboo nature of the scenes. Because these are just niches, we have seen many times before in porn. Their production values are increasing the taboo-level. None of that is a really a complaint. I really enjoy story-driven porn. You end up in porn with one of two scenarios. You either get repetitive plot story-driven porn or you get no stories, repetitive porn. I will take the story side even it’s repetitive. I will give them credit for creating moods that makes the scenes feel more uncomfortable and tense. I have been looking at Pretty Dirty which is explained to be the precursor to Pure Taboo. I will review it separately. I see a lot of differences between the sites.
the easiest way to describe the scenes on the site is to say you’re going to be put into a scenario and plot meant to make you uncomfortable. That this should not be happening. I would give them a B+ for that. It really should be lower, maybe a C, but I am considering they must create stories their actors and actresses can act out believably. Just some of what I noticed as stories/taboos I have seen in the past. There is a scene called, “Blind Surprise” where there is a blind person in the scene. I don’t think she is blind. She is acting it. One of the very first porn movies I watched. It was before internet porn. Was about a blind man with a woman. He was questioning his sexuality since he could not see. I still remember this because I thought it was so wrong when I watched it. She fingered his butthole to see how he liked that. Then, she had sex with him to see if he liked that better. That scene had to be 1970s or maybe 80s. It was on a tape my dad had. I know as well as anyone that creative ideas are rarely new. On the other hand, if you come into this site expecting something very taboo, you’re not going to get it.
It's a very good site for what it is. It’s one of the sites that makes me glad I bought the year subscription. Hopefully, they keep on with what they are doing and improving it. The scenes are very long. There are not as many 4K videos on this site as there are on other Adult Time sites. I don’t know if time/filesize is a factor in that. All the newer scenes do have 4k. I think if you’re on this specific site for 4K, you may have missed the point. This is a weird recommendation. See it as the site that gives you reason to join Adult Time for a year. There’s a lot of potential on this site. |
|
02-09-22 06:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
Quest For Orgasm
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Lets Doe It Network
Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs
Highest quality production values
Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network |
| Cons: |
Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole
Only 80 scenes
Has not updated since September 2017 |
| Bottom Line: |
For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how.
The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved.
The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos.
The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago.
This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that. |
|
09-05-21 06:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Ruth Blackwell
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There are 114 scenes, not a small site, but not impressive either
Easy to use search by tags
Can join using Paypal as well as many giftcards
Interesting looking camsite that I did not checkout
Rare porn that focuses on a single pregnant model, who sometimes adds a friend to the scene |
| Cons: |
No High Definition content, of course no 4K either
No Pornusers discount so this is expensive for the quality
Not adding new scenes
No model interaction
Too many ads on members’ pages |
| Bottom Line: |
A lot has changed for the better since this site was new. There are many porn fans who like interracial porn, but it is hardly rare or taboo any longer. I like porn with black men and I can enjoy seeing their cocks in action. However, I did not like seeing black men being stereotyped as thugs and the idea that black men all have huge cocks is not true. I also did not like that the white women were portrayed as cheating on their white boyfriends or husbands. One description I read was calling them lame ass white boys with tiny wieners or even worse, when compared to black men they have erectile dysfunction.
Ruth Blackwell is pregnant in most, but not all of the scenes. Pregnant porn is rather a theme with limited appeal to most porn fans I would imagine, as not much Is produced. I was uncomfortable with even the idea. She states that she wants child support from the presumably black father, but has no idea which of many he may be. The site describes her as she’s evil, she’s mean, she is the black cock queen. I don’t need to say I did not like much about this site.
The site does not have any High Definition videos, not a single one. In 2021 that makes this behind the times and by quite a lot. In my opinion, the scenes were barely watchable. The sex itself was rather standard and to the point. There is oral and vaginal, but for good reason nothing more extreme. Many of the scenes have another woman with her and her guy. Mostly these are blond white women, but I did see a few Asians and even a black woman, Alexis Silver. The woman who was the hottest was Kelly Wells, who was a major star years ago. In many of these scenes it is stated that her partner woman was trying to get pregnant in the scene. Another goal was to get the partner woman converted to preferring black men.
As a site, it was laid out well and easy to use. Searching is easy. It says there are live webcams featuring the models, but that leads to a link that goes nowhere. On the left side of the page, there is advertising for a cam site, called Dogfartlive, which I recognized as Streammate. I did not try it. I felt there was too much advertising for it, to the point that it was distracting. The site states that there will be updates, but the quality makes me think of porn from before 2010. There is zero model interaction too. No way to contact her, chat, make a request, nothing.
For the price, I expected a lot more from a site. |
|
10-19-21 12:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
142
|
Samuel O'Toole
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Finally, a male solo model that lives up to his name!
121 scenes with 21 being solo, 10 being with women and the rest being two or more guys together.
Videos can be downloaded from mobile size up to 1080p. Only a few of the oldest videos are in lower resolution.
Pictures that can be downloaded.
Good performer, he gets strong erections and has big cumshots. |
| Cons: |
No tag or category for the scenes with women. It’s a gay site with a “gay” tag, isn’t that implied? But no tag for the scenes with women?
There is such a fine-line when discussing this part: The “gay” scenes are really gay. I am just trying to help both females considering it and gay males too.
The guys they put with him are not very attractive and most seem dominated by him. I noticed a comment on one video asking if Sam “ever takes the dick”. That could be what I’m noticing too. |
| Bottom Line: |
Samuel O’Toole is at least close to that “hunky” group of men. He’s big built, looks well above-average endowed, athletic looking and he has a little arrogance.
I want to explain the “really gay” comment. There is one scene where a smallish guy walks in the room and sits on Samuel’s lap like he’s Santa Claus. When Samuel pulls the guy’s pants down he has a bow on his dick and says, “You don’t have to wait for your package.” I like corny sense of humor, puns, but that “joke” just seems like it belongs in the Lifetime Virgin Hall of Fame. The scenes seem forced. I pay attention to the comments on the scenes. I figure those are left by gay men and I’m curious to see how much of what I see, they see. Nearly every comment is about Samuel being too dominant, it’s about him not bending over for the other guys and that’s what I mean by forced. I’m not fully believing this is a gay or bisexual man. He is in charge of all scenes. Even with the women. It’s more like watching one guy dominate the other guy than watching sex.
The solo scenes are better. Am I going to get booed for saying his arrogance that is noticeable in all scenes shows most in how much he enjoys touching himself? I won’t fault his performance ability. He gets a strong, upward curve erection and just guessing is at least 7” looks to be above average circumference. He himself looks like he’s probably 6’2” 200+ pounds of muscle. And it will always be an important part to me, he has the impressive cumshots. I don’t see me keeping anything more than the solo videos. I don’t even enjoy his scenes with women. He seems to turn caveman when others are involved.
The site is decent sized with 121 scenes, but I’m only going to keep 21 of those, I would recommend it to gay men that are into being the bottom role and like being dominated. For females, the 21 solo scenes are good. I’m piecing together my own collection of solo male scenes. That makes 21 better than 0. If we could just switch his attitude and personality with some of these other guys. |
|
12-08-21 02:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site that started my interest in lesbian porn and it's still at the top of the lesbian site list
Quality is near unmatched, very crisp and clear video downloads and outstanding quality photosets to download.
The other quality is high too. That's the believability and quality of the action. If these women are not really into lesbian scenes, they are damn good actresses
What was the old tagline? Pretty girls doing it right? Sounds right to me and explains the majority of their content.
Lots of tags and good searching capabilities
One of the few sites that can win me over without much talking, the models' mouths are usually full of something or something else |
| Cons: |
There is no story! That's usually a deathblow for me, a dealbreaker, but see above, pretty girls doing it right. That's all the story I need. May not be enough for you.
How about the dumbest con ever? The women are too attractive. You know half the people that watch the scenes say, "there's no way she's into women!" Which is what makes it great to me. I like fantasies. |
| Bottom Line: |
You know a site is really strong when it comes with a network and the network doesn't even get mentioned in the pros. Sapphic Erotica is now part of the Sapphix network along with Fist Flush and Give Me Pink. Making it one of the best networks. Unlike most networks, Sapphix has Sapphic Erotica as the breadwinner and Give Me Pink and Fist Flush as support or bonus sites.
Sapphic Erotica has been around longer than I have been watching online porn and I'm not that young. And knowing this will make a few of the other Porn Users laugh, I thought Sapphic Erotica was too hardcore back when I first got into porn. That didn't last for very long. And I'm glad it didn't. Sapphic Erotica was one of the first sites that made me feel real sexual attraction to women, even though, I have never even tried sex with women.
The content ranges from deep, passionate kissing and grinding tribbing to strap ons and more hardcore acts. It works perfectly for fantasies since you know, in fantasies, sex is never boring or repetitive. Which is a major compliment to Sapphic Erotica. Even if the scenes are repetitive, it's a good repetitive and it's some of the highest quality, technical and in action, porn available.
I can compare the scenes to other top lesbian sites like Mommy's Girl on Adult Time, but I don't think those scenes are near as good as these scenes. Stories are a great part of porn when done right. I'm not for sure lesbian porn has a good plot or storyline available. Let it be two attractive women testing each other out that turns into a torrid romp of wild sex.
The best part of the tags is the inclusion of positions involved in each scene. If you like 69, there's a tag for it and for every other lesbian niche position you can think of.
The models are almost all European. When I first started joining porn sites, European porn was on top of the porn world and this site shows why. The models, many of them, are 9s or 10s.
I have seen individual lesbian scenes on other sites that were better. I have seen lesbian scenes that were more hardcore, but I don't know of a lesbian site with this much consistent quality, action and technical quality.
The network is just a bonus, I didn't want to use "cherry on top", as the sites Fist Flush and Give Me Pink are two of the better sites from their respective niches. Fist Flush is a site focused on young women fisting each other and it's relatively extreme compared to other fisting sites. Give Me Pink is a site that once was one of the top solo sites. Pretty women, doing extreme things to their body and high quality close up camerawork. If you get your eye too close, you might get pink ... eye, sorry, couldn't resist.
I just don't think you're going to find a site like Sapphic Erotica in 2024. It stands so far and above its competition. |
|
08-13-24 09:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
144
|
Sapphix
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This network is so good; it’s overwhelming
Includes Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush
Unlimited downloads of videos and picture zips
Almost unlimited amount of very pretty models
It has an extensive set of tags to search from
The three sites combined have around 3,000 scenes
Multiple navigation options that do make it easier to find what you’re looing for, but that is also part of the overwhelming. |
| Cons: |
It's overwhelming. Too much of a good thing.
I have joined 3 different times and feel like I’ve only scratched the surface |
| Bottom Line: |
I followed reviews of Sapphic Erotica, even back when I wasn’t willing to join a porn site. The previews from the site were often featured on referral sites and I always liked the preview videos. There is a lack of realness in the scenes, but authenticity is in the conscious mind of the beholder.
Not only are my only complaints about how big the network is and how good it is, there’s also the rarity of the older scenes often being the best scenes on the network – but only until you watch another scene. This continues for days, then weeks, then you join a year membership. At least that’s how it worked for me!
The site itself has everything you could ever ask for. Many tags, even some that you may not know what the tag means. The main focus of the network is beautiful women. Sapphic Erotica is lesbian content with models that steal the spotlight. You don’t even think about what the story or plot is. A story or plot would likely detract from the action.
The video resolutions are up to 4K and there are multiple download resolutions. You can also download the photosets and there are no download limits. It’s as close to perfect as a network can be for me. It’s the only network I’ve ever joined for a year.
The blend of sites does stay focused on pretty women, but each site has its own identity. Give Me Pink is a solo site with some of the scenes being extreme. The models, despite being 10s in looks and dressed nicely go for timid to out of control orgasms in minutes. Fist Flush is about as far into fisting as I am interested in and by just watching fisting scenes from Fist Flush is my own version of moderation.
Sapphic Erotica is the obvious star of the network. It really is good enough to join just it without any network sites included, but you do get the two extra sites. The lesbian scenes are very much softcore. You won’t see a lot of rough sex between the ladies, but that’s what I prefer. Give Me Pink almost is going too far for my interests. Fist Flush really pushes my limits, but that’s why moderation is good.
I don’t think you’ll find a better softcore “females only” experience than Sapphix. |
|
10-11-23 07:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
Sapphix
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Includes 3 female-centric sites, Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush. A total of 2,400 scenes. These include a video and high-quality photo set. You may download all.
They have 1,150 of the prettiest women I have ever laid my eyes on.
Billing company changes, I sometimes get Rocketgate, sometimes Epoch, both are easy to use and cancel.
Video quality on Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink is excellent.
Tagging system is one of the best in the business.
Sapphic Erotica has group scenes, always at least 2 women and Give Me Pink is always solo. |
| Cons: |
Fist Flush has not been updated since 2018 and only has 77 scenes on it, the content they have is good, but if you're only joining for it know ahead of time it's not being updated.
There's some serious gay for pay going on, some of the scenes feel like neither woman wants to be there. |
| Bottom Line: |
When Sapphix was created it was one of the greatest days in female-centric porn. You get the archive site Fist Flush for those into the rougher fisting (only girls, no guys), you get Sapphic Erotica, one of the greatest lesbian sites ever created and you get Give Me Pink, a solo, but hardcore solo site.
The video quality and options are as good as any site I have seen.
Sapphic Erotica has been offering 4K downloads on every scene since October 2015. If you don't want 4K they also offer 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They have been offering 1080p since 2007!
Give Me Pink has been offering 4K downloads since November 2015 and those also come with 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They too have been offering 1080p since 2007.
Fist Flush's few newer updates offer 4K and all of their past scenes have 1080p, 720p and 540p.
Each scene includes a photo set that is up to 3000 resolution. These can be downloaded as zip files.
Gay for pay does hamper some of the scenes, but I would estimate it at less than 15% of the scenes. Most of the scenes on Sapphic Erotica are believable enough to make a girl wonder about the talk of bi-curious.
Give Me Pink could be a little much for some as there are extreme insertions, but I have noticed those are in the older scenes. The newer scenes are more standard "hard masturbation".
Fist Flush is a site about fisting. I'm not really into this scenes myself -- they even have anal fisting.
It does offer a varied selection from scene to scene, the kissable, lovable, innocent tribbing of the cute, pretty and even beautiful lesbians on Sapphic Erotica, the harder masturbation of the Give Me Pink girls and the whole fist of Fist Flush.
The tagging system here is really incredible. As many as you want can be used at one time.
It starts with Categories - here you have anal, kissing, 69 and 26 other choices.
Now you get Locations - They have living room, outdoors, pool and 9 other locations.
Next is Face Type - baby face, slutty, butch and 6 more types of faces
Bringing Ethnicity in now - Exotic, Hispanic, Caucasian and Black
How about Hair Color - redhead, brunette, blonde and 3 more
Need more for hair fetishes, Hair Style - short, long-curly, long-straight and 4 more
Can't forget those sexy Eyes - blue, grey, brown and green
What about the body art - tattoos, piercings, branding and glasses
Like some Pubic Hair - shaved, trimmed, hairy
Can't forget the pussy/labia type - small, medium, meat curtains (really?), big clit
Ethnicity wasn't enough, Skin Tone - light, medium, dark, tan-lines
Thought they forgot the Breasts - natural, flat, floppy, fake, perky, large, teardrop, medium
But don't forget the Butt - thick, bubble butt, apple, average and flat
What good are those without Body Type - athletic, curvy, MILF, petite, tall, barely legal and more
Who needs Clothes - costume, bikini, jeans, hot pants, dress, heels, sneakers, fully naked(invisible clothes?), leggings, hose, stockings, pajamas and more.
Last is the site - Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink, Fist Flush
You can go through all those options and mark everyone you want to see and it will filter down to the scenes with everything you marked. I think it's why I like the site so much. There is no guessing. You can literally select what you want to see and it will be there.
Sapphic Erotica has 1,798 scenes, Give Me Pink has 391 scenes, Fist Flush has 77 scenes and they do have interviews, but there are only 59 of those.
In my opinion, they have the best all-around experience in porn -- the quality, the quantity, the excellent tagging system and the quality of models. |
|
10-14-19 08:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
146
|
Say Uncle
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A network of gay sites and it’s worth a look for straight women and gay men too
Includes access to 5 sites and advertised as over 30 channels
Over 2,000 scenes and picture sets on the whole network.
Everything is downloadable and the downloads are unlimited.
Video download quality goes up to 1080p
It's the most entertaining gay porn I have seen |
| Cons: |
The combination of 30 channel claims and faulty navigation make using the network, more difficult than it should be
If you’re tired of straight false incest porn; here’s you a whole network of gay false incest porn |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network back months ago, but didn’t ever review it. I rejoined a few weeks ago and am happy to review it with the proclamation of it’s the most entertaining gay porn I have seen. The network includes access to Say Uncle, Brother Crush, Family Dick, Latin Leche, Perverted Perps and the site, not a joke, Missionary Boys. The sites do a good and at least maybe believable job of living up to these themes. The brother crush site is stepbrothers having sex and playing with each other. Say Uncle is older men dominating younger men. Family Dick is just all-around false incest. Latin Leche is of Latin men spilling their boy milk for each other. Perverted Perps is a lot like any of the false cop arrests someone and makes them have sex to free them. Missionary Boys is young men in Missionary outfits and doing things with each other and with the older men too.
Definitely a step in the right direction of perversion. I never realized how politically correct gay porn is until I started seeing themes like Missionary Boys. That’s definitely pushing the genre ahead or behind – depending on your view.
I have not seen many gay sites that even use themes or outfits in their scenes. I may get booed or pelted by tomatoes for saying false gay incest does not seem as ludicrous as false straight incest. I’m sure there are stepbrothers who see their stepbrother nude for the first time and realize they like it. I’m sure there are older men who try and take advantage of their younger nephews or stepsons and yes, I’m sure there are cops and authority figures who abuse their power to get the sex they are ashamed to tell their wife about. Most of all, Missionary Boys, may just be the most believable gay porn site ever created. I say that with no ill-intentions and as a Catholic.
The network has almost 2,000 scenes and 2,000 accompanying picture sets. There are no limits on downloads and downloads come with the basic subscription. One thing to make note of is the price. It shows as $50 per month, but when I signed up, there was a $14.95 promo for the whole network and downloads included.
I do think the dark humor twist is needed in gay porn. I’ve heard many gay jokes told by gay men about sitting on grandpa’s lap and uncle helping with a shower. But it does seem the gay porn world is highly politically correct and not touching the taboo themes.
This network is very good porn for a gay man and some of it still has appeal for straight women. It’s at least partially entertaining and giggle-worthy at times and it’s updating with a huge back catalog. Great network that I believe is the best of the gay networks. |
|
08-07-23 10:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Sex Art
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the most conflicting sites for me and I consider that a positive.
They have 736 models and I would say -- in my opinion -- they have the most attractive collection of models of any site I have been a member of. Even their male models are very attractive.
There are 1,462 videos and I am focusing on that since it’s where a lot of my conflicting feelings come from. I won’t list it as a con, but the scenes are too short.
They have 1,895 photo sets and because of the conflicting nature of the videos, I often find myself more interested in the photos.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded with no limits.
Daily update of either a photo set or video. It alternates day to day. |
| Cons: |
They have tried several different angles at creating unique content, but seem to always pull the plug on them. “Fan Fiction”, “Girls Love Sex” to name a few.
The male/female scenes are my least favorite male/female scenes from any site. I doubt I have ever used this word to describe a sex scene or ever will again -- stodgy. I’m even happy that most of them are short. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sex Art is a site I want so bad to love and I do like a lot of it, maybe even crush on it some too, but have yet to reach that love feeling. While I didn’t list it as a con it is my biggest problem with the site. The scenes are too short, maybe they’re too edited even. One of the newest scenes has three of the most attractive female models I have seen: Baby Nicols, Anya Krey and Mina Moreno. They are in what looks like a tropical, exotic jungle or forest. Excuse my American side. The scenery is beautiful. The models are all stunning and natural. The “good part” starts around the 3 minute mark of the video and the rest of the video lasts another 13 minutes. How can you go through that much trouble to get these 3 near perfect models into a near perfect location then just shoot 16 total minutes of video? At the minimum, I would say it should be 30 minutes and I wouldn’t complain if it was 60 minutes.
That problem isn’t just with that one scene. Nearly all the scenes are under 20 minutes. Are we saying that professional porn stars can’t last longer than average people? That’s why I call this a conflicting site. There are a lot of scenes I want to love on the site, but then they end. I do not think it’s a situation where the site is cheap. Their production values are as good as any site I have been on, but why are the scenes not longer? It reminds me of a review I posted last month of a site which I said about it, “They’re trying to do too much, but not doing any of it very well.” That’s not how I feel about Sex Art. I feel like they are doing everything right, but then just cut it short. Well, almost everything, I don’t like the male/female scenes on here. They do a very good job of setting these scenes up with varied storylines, but once the initial dialogue is over the scenes fall into the redundancy of most hardcore scenes.
There isn’t much you can complain about as far as the site goes unless something in particular bothers you like the short scenes do me. They have almost 1,500 videos and nearly 2,000 photo sets. The photo sets are excellent quality and oftentimes take longer to look at than it takes to watch the video. One complaint on the photo sets is they are not coordinated with the videos. The video scene I started the review with is titled, “Adventurous”. There is no “Adventurous” photo set, but there does seem to be a couple of photo sets that connect to the videos (same model and outfit).
I don’t know why they stopped attempting their different series. I thought the “Fan Fiction” series was very interesting since it goes into different fetishes, but they stopped those in 2017. If nothing else, I guess you have to give them credit for at least trying and trying again to keep improving. The newer scenes do not give me that same feeling. Maybe the market and feedback dictates that? They seem to be settled into a certain style of scene for male/female, lesbian, solo and are sticking to it.
I am going to bump my score up from the last time I reviewed it. Back then, it was one of my first reviews and I had only been joining artsy/softcore sites. Now that I’ve been through the ups and downs of very hardcore sites it makes me appreciate Sex Art more. I just hope they don’t fall into a formulaic pattern. The videos are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p, two smaller versions and two lesser used formats WMV and DivX. I did upgrade to a 4K monitor/television, but I only download the 720p or 1080p versions. If you’re into scenes that end way too fast this could be your new favorite site. For me, it’s an excellent site that just leaves me wanting more with nearly every scene. |
|
04-06-21 02:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Sex Art
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation.
Male and female models are very attractive.
The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand.
Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos.
The site updates each day.
Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost. |
| Cons: |
Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in.
I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that.
It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it.
A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn.
The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other.
The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into.
They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money.
I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates.
It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off.
The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes.
These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions."
That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too.
It lingers way too close to cheesy for me. |
|
07-16-19 01:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
149
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
09-30-19 11:11pm (Update History)
Reason: Graded it on streaming abilities, original review was more frustrated with their lie on their join page.
|
| Pros: |
Network of 6 sites, a fitness site, a massage site, a MILF site, a hardcore site and two lesbian sites.
The content looks very good, but I was tricked by a promotional offer from them. I can't download anything.
There are 471 models on the network with most looking like pros.
The download options for videos show 360p to 1080p
They have photo sets that can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
The join screen said unlimited downloads. Once inside, it told me I had to pay $14.95 to download. Anyone could go to the site right now, click join and you will see the unlimited downloads banner with no asterisk or fine print.
It looks like most of it is very normal porn. The promo showed fitness scenes that looked like group environments, but the scenes on the site don't look that way. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to rewrite this bottom line. I still am upset by the promotion of unlimited downloads only to find out they come at an extra charge.
I will give a basic overview of what you get. You can stream the videos and look at the photos.
Dane Jones is a standard hardcore site with 698 scenes, it updates 3 times per week.
Lesbea is a standard lesbian site with 600 scenes, it updates 1-2 times per week, 6 updates in September.
Massage Rooms has both scenarios of massages, men massaging women, women massaging men and sex. It has 528 scenes and updated 6 times in September.
MomXXX is a MILF site with straight sex and lesbian sex, it only updated twice in September.
Fitness Rooms is an exercise and exercise clothing fetish hardcore site. It has 163 scenes and updated twice in September.
Girlfriends is a lesbian site, more college-type age models and has 204 scenes. It updated 3 times in September.
The download options are 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p, you have to pay $14.95 for them. I feel like I'm writing a repeat review of Mofos. There's good quality content here. The Girlfriends site is really good.
There are hardly no ads in the member's area. The site works well, you can browse by site or by network update. You can browse by model. They have an excellent tagging system. Everything is in place for a top-tier site except telling you that you get unlimited downloads then saying you have to pay $14.95 for them.
I felt like Mofos might be worth paying the extra for on the downloads, but this Sexy Hub site doesn't feel like it is. This feels like a site that should be around $15 and it should include downloads.
I've developed a frustrated feeling with these sites. I'm not even a regular downloading type member, but I have noticed most Porn User members are. It does say in the TBP review that downloads cost extra, but it said unlimited downloads on the join page.
To add to this, I went through the cancel by chat process and it took nearly 25 minutes. The rep asked me why I was canceling. I told him/her I was going out of town and didn't want to forget it. The rep then told me they found an expired promo they would let me have for $72 a year. I thanked them, but told them I would rather not join long-term. They disconnected the chat. A few minutes later I received a cancellation email. I will try to avoid joining sites with this biller from now on. |
|
09-30-19 10:06pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
150
|
She's Brand New
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene.
Pretty women, some variety as well.
The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot.
They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month.
Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed. |
| Cons: |
This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading.
No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size.
I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes) |
| Bottom Line: |
I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too.
This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution.
Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive.
The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others.
All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty. |
|
03-10-21 01:13am
Replies (0)
|
|
