| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
|
04-06-21 02:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
102
|
MetArt
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site.
There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you.
The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in.
The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed.
They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets.
Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones. |
| Cons: |
It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con.
Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26. |
| Bottom Line: |
What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year.
What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling.
I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body.
The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it.
The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair. |
|
04-06-21 02:21am
Replies (1)
|
Review
103
|
Mike's Apartment
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
European models being coerced (probably not) into going back to an apartment to have sex.
Started out as Reality Kings initial step into the world of European porn.
Gorgeous, AAA European models with many major Euro stars.
Site has 812 scenes on it.
Streaming player works well with little to no buffering.
If taking the download upgrade the videos are mostly 720p or 1080p (HD) |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating on December 27, 2018
Downloads cost extra ($14.95 per month)
Not as much story or talking as other RK scenes since some of the models don’t speak English. |
| Bottom Line: |
My initial interest in porn was on European models. Sites like Nubiles, Sapphic Erotica, Club Seventeen were really all I joined for several years. I had always wanted to join this site to see the usually softcore European models in reality themed, hardcore sex.
The site’s older scenes stand out as there are more known stars and the scenes had more of a story or at least dialogue. Some of the scenes are lacking so much in story, the model just walks in the apartment, sits down, takes her clothes off and the sex or masturbation starts. Some start in a car where they (Reality Kings) are driving the model to the apartment and you do get some car action from flashing to blowjobs.
The site stopped updating at the end of 2018, but it had a nice run with 812 scenes and is one of those sites if you like the content you might download 200-300 of the scenes. There’s not as much playfulness in these scenes as the other Reality King scenes but depending on the viewer that could be a positive or a negative. The sex in these scenes is average to above average in quality. I do think these are the prettiest and closest to natural models on Reality Kings.
If you choose to upgrade to the download package there are plenty of HD videos 1080p and 720p to download, but no 4K. The photo sets are also worth downloading if you’re into photos as this content is 100% exclusive and can’t be found anywhere else. If you don’t choose to upgrade to downloads you can still use their very good streaming player.
One thing I have noticed is the scenes are not quite as hardcore as the hardcore scenes on Reality King’s other sites. A lot of these European stars were not known for male/female scenes. There are also some girl/girl scenes and solo as well. It's a good site if you ever wondered how your favorite European models would do in hardcore scenes. So far, it has been my favorite site on the Reality Kings network. |
|
01-27-20 07:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
104
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the Reality Kings network, it’s a very large MILF site.
815 scenes, each scene includes a photo set and 35-45 minute video.
If you add-on downloads the majority of scenes are available in 1080p or 720p.
Scenes vary between woman in control, man in control.
Overall, good production values with many of the scenes having some funny dialogue and setup.
If you’re not into downloads the streaming player works well. |
| Cons: |
Downloads cost extra, $15 per month for them and the download upgrade does include photo sets.
Too much clutter, ads, upsells
Site stopped updating on June 12, 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milf Hunter is a hardcore site about a man on the hunt for Milfs to have sex with. That’s how it started; they eventually went to a format where there was a different man in nearly every scene. The sex is common hardcore, blowjobs, doggystyle, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
Despite the site no longer updating it is still one of the biggest Milf sites available with 815 scenes and each of those videos average around 40 minutes. There is a playful nature to a lot of the scenes including light exhibitionism, car flashing and some scenes starting in public locations.
I think the downloads are worth it for a month or two. They have good quality videos with nearly all having HD (720p or 1080p) download options and I haven’t run into a download limit. Maybe they removed the limit once you’ve paid for downloads? The photo sets are screen captures and can be downloaded with the download upgrade. It’s still a worthy site for those into the Milf niche. |
|
01-27-20 07:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
Milking Table
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Fantasy Massage network of six massage themed sites.
Comes with access to Adult Time, which has over 56,000 videos
There are no download limits
The women range from innocent barely legal to MILFs who know what they like.
The site was easy to use and the streaming player works without needing to buffer. I like to stream scenes before downloading them. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating as of February of 2016.
One thing I noticed was there are a lot of tattooed models on here if that's a problem for you. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milking Table is no longer updating and that is a shame as I found it deserving of my time and attention. I found 112 videos of men getting massaged and women helping them with hand and blowjobs.
What I liked best is the way the cum shots were shown as a reward for the women, who were visibly excited by what they were doing and what they were about to get. The pretty models seemed to enjoy the scenes even more than the lucky guys. The scenes generally start with the couple talking, but not a real story. She next helps herself and her guy with a good slow stroking hand job, then some oral loving. What happens next is something I have not seen on another site. He lays down on a massage table with his nice very hard cock sticking down through a hole in it. She is stroking and sucking his cock, but you don’t see his face. Instead the focus is on her look of pleasure as she is enjoying him as an object of her desire. As a reward she gets a nice cum shot in her mouth or on her face. I love to watch men cumming, especially big amounts. For me seeing that creamy filling shooting out is always the best part in a porn scene.
The models varied as you see some that are innocent and barely legal and some that are into their thirties and even forties. The younger models were fun to watch. What I liked even more was that I could easily see myself as one of these older women, doing what they were doing.
My biggest complaint is that there were so few videos. However, you also get Adult Time with over 56,000 videos of many different kinds of sex action. For massage content, you get this site as well as the six sites of the Fantasy Massage network. It's a site worth looking into if you find yourself bored with Adult Time's regular content. This is close to being CFNM porn with the models keeping at least some of their clothes on throughout most of the scenes. |
|
01-06-20 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
106
|
Mixed X
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No downloading or streaming limits
A lot of good acting and great camerawork
Brief biography and photo for every model
Updates with one new scene per week
Segpay is a biller with a good reputation. |
| Cons: |
Almost 70 videos
No other sites or bonuses are included
Stops and hiccups too much while streaming
Disappointing download speeds |
| Bottom Line: |
If you just look at the types of sex in the scenes, you may think that the site is just a mixture without a focus. The sex is mostly anal, interracial and lesbian. However, this site is more than a collection of sex acts. The site describes itself as featuring the art of cinematic handheld porn. You may think that it is one of those sites that is all about sex art. As I discovered, this is far from being a standard porn site.
MixedX opened months ago in October of 2020 and Hungarian veteran porn model Christina Shine is the star here. She has 19 videos and photo sets. She is very sensual in her scenes and makes them very memorable. Both her acting skills as well as her pure genuine enjoyment of the sex are on display here. She does mostly interracial scenes with very dark, very large black men, very rare in Eastern European porn. I could not take my eyes off the color contrast. She has a unique style that makes the scenes work well for both men and even more for women. Couples could love the raw eroticism as this is porn with a story that is done well. For me what makes her scenes sizzle are the interactions and chemistry with her male costars. Women can see her and identify with how she feels. Men can see some really hot sex that is a feast for the eyes.
On the site there are 23 scenes labeled as XFlix Originals. These are some of the best examples I have seen of hot camerawork. When I think of a handheld camera, I think shaky and amateur. Not on this site. The cinematography is an essential part of the visual appeal. There are also 15 story driven videos that are labeled as from Adam and Eve TV and star American models. I loved that there are a few with Elsa Jean and Cherie DeVille as well as Hungarian pornstars Amirah Adara and Nesty. The site itself is easy to use and has a good tag system. The download options are full HD as the best. Some videos are labeled as 4K, but don’t have the specifications. They seem to be just full HD. The photos can be downloaded in two different qualities. The link that says photos are those taken from the videos.
I don’t understand why there is no option to also join the sister sites, Genuine Sin or Girls Fuck Girls. I would like to see a network price for all three. This is a site that delivers hot scenes and will be an even better value as it grows. |
|
09-05-21 07:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
107
|
Mommy Blows Best
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of five site network , Blowpass. There are four large blow job sites in it
Inexpensive to join
Mostly older women and younger men. Mostly experienced pornstars that have years in the industry.
Great bodies and professional performances and the guys fit the theme
As of today, there are 560 videos available |
| Cons: |
Can be repetitious as there is not a lot of variety you can do with a focus on blow jobs.
It is hard to tell when it will update. January had none, but December had four
The oldest videos are not Full High Definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
The same sex act can get boring rather quickly. The better sites have to have more going for them than just the obvious. I feel that Mommy Blows Best is one of the better blowjob sites because it has much that appeals to my imagination.
The age of the women here is MILF, not necessarily a family relationship like stepmother. There are scenes with a stepmother and a stepson, but there are also scenes with a stepdaughter and her boyfriend. Around fifteen scenes have the two women together in a lesson to show the young lady how to do it properly. These were some of my favorites out of all the 560 or so that the site has.
Being older, the women have a confidence level that younger porn models just don’t have. These are mostly, if not all, pornstars that have been around in the industry since they were young. For them a great blow job is second nature and can do a hot scene with ease. Sometimes the scenes can seem repetitive as a result, but then again the site has a deeper appeal to many fetishes. Being older, they can be identified with by showing that sexy side of all women that comes out as we reach our second sexual peak. Teens show enthusiasm, but MILFs have the hormones and have the benefit of experience, but in spades. Being older and more confident, we know what we like and what we need. The women on this site see men as sexy conquests to be there for our pleasure and enjoyment. Younger men who are not so experienced or jaded from a lot of sex can be attractive. Older women and younger men is a fetish that can be appreciated by women of all ages. This may be an unlikely pairing in real life, but as a porn fantasy it is fun to watch.
Older women are filled out and have bodies that may not be the perfect ones if you prefer thin models. Some of these models are quite, let’s say voluptuous, full figured and very real. Big breasts are to be found everywhere and a few are unfortunately enhanced ones. This body shape works well as for those with a uniform fetish. Sexy housewife or office workers in short skirts and pantyhose, teachers that are well dressed in less revealing clothes that emphasize their shape, all work well for me. Nicely done hair and makeup, a blouse that is too tight, and just the right shoes and you have my attention.
Mostly the scenes involve a kind of power and age difference. Teacher and student, boss with employee, nurse and patient, landlord and tenant are just a few attention grabbers. The age difference makes for hot older and younger. The guys seem to be surprised as well as flattered, not entitled, when the women are interested in them.
A few of the guys are black men, but really only a few. The women are the real stars here and some are Asian, or Black, but nearly all of the stars are white. There are lots of big names from the past when they were younger and some I have never seen before and wish I had.
I see in the oldest videos that there is a male star that is in nearly every video way back then. They give his name as Jack H. I have heard of him, but have never seen him, as he is from before my time. I heard he used to have his own site, something very few male performers can say. He seems to be a good looking, very nice guy, well endowed even by porn standards and his cumshots are a joy to watch. His name is Jack Hammer, and I like his toolbox. I just wish the video quality had been better back then.
The sets are mostly indoors in a kitchen or dining room, or in an office. The sets enhance heat in the scenes and are just beautiful. The downloads are fast and the 4K quality quite impressive. Not only are there 560 videos, a rather large number, the other sites in the network are mostly excellent blowjobs as well. |
|
02-09-22 06:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
108
|
Mommy's Girl
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A collaboration between genres: MILFs meet younger lesbians
Most of the scenes have good to excellent and relevant storylines
Over 550 scenes featuring a video and picture set with each
It is part of Adult Time and if you’re familiar with Adult Time, you know to sign up for the downloads included option or you will end up with a streaming only site
The acting, screenplay, settings, all make these scenes some of the best in the lesbian genre
Downloadable videos are up to 4K |
| Cons: |
In my opinion, it does not play to the most relatable storylines the younger/older niche has
Adult Time’s navigation can be annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
I also reviewed All Over 30. I find that MILF porn features 3 types of MILFs. I believe the least likely in real life is an older woman with a younger man scene. I speaking from my own experience. Not only do most of the 30s women I know not like younger men, we are even less interested in sex with the younger man. The middle and more acceptable niche – even believable, is older woman with a younger woman.
Blame social media for my jaded view of younger men. If only I received a free membership to a porn site each time an unknown younger guy sent me a message that said, “I know you older women are hitting your sexual peak!”
Mommy’s Girl starts off with the basis of what I think is the most believable of the MILF having sex, fantasy. I do believe younger women is more believable than younger men. The scenes also include believable stories, but for my money, they do not play enough to the most realistic storyline. The older woman who has been married – and her sex life is boring. Somewhere in my sheepishly perverted brain, I want to believe that is how the first threesomes happened. A husband came in from working 12 hours to find his wife in a 69 with a younger woman. It seems likely and believable.
That does leave room to then bring the older man in to wear his wife and her girlfriend out, but that may be too complex for hardcore porn to convey.
Some storylines that I believe they do cover well includes the younger woman being a fitness instructor who was hired to train the MILF. Very believable. Especially if the younger woman is single. Horny is implied when I said she’s single.
As strong as that storyline is (younger woman, older woman), it’s still not as believable as MILFs masturbating, I can all but guarantee and bet my life savings on there are more masturbating MILFs than ones with younger men or younger women. It’s also, in my opinion, a way for older women in porn to show they are still sexy even when not having sex with someone else. There’s more riding on their performance in solo scenes than lesbian scenes. There is a lot of content too. Roughly 550 videos and 550 picture sets. The majority of videos can be downloaded in 4K and all picture sets can be downloaded.
It's a great site that, for me, is a little overhyped based on the stories. The stories are good for porn, but the stories are also repeated and twisted. I do see the addition of Adult Time as a major bonus, but if you’ve been an Adult Time member before, you are probably going to be like me and be joining mainly for one specific site. I did that to compare this version of MILF porn with the version All Over 30 has. |
|
07-09-23 07:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
109
|
Mother Fucker XXX
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A blend of older/younger and cuckolding.
Large site with 914 scenes, but no longer updating.
Good quality downloads on close to half of the scenes.
Some rare videos that I used to have under different names. That could be a big positive with this site.
Nearly all niches of straight porn are covered. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure I agree with the name of the site. There are some scenes that are much older women. Some are just younger women. There’s nothing holding the theme together.
I believe all these scenes come from DVDs. About half of the scenes max out at 480p download. I downloaded some. They look okay if it’s a scene you want.
The navigation is not very good. It’s because of the misleading title and tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site caught my eye with some DVDs that I used to have. Those are named differently on this site. The previous versions I had were titled, “Screw My Wife”. On this site those are titled, “Lifestyles of the Cuckold”. I always liked those scenes. If you’re not familiar with those. The older man that is in every scene is what made me recognize the scenes. I don’t know his name, but he is an older, bald man. He gets a little involved in some scenes. The main part of the scenes is a more endowed man having sex with a wife while the husband watches. This older, bald man just sits there and watches too. That was my main reason for even looking at this site. I wanted those and downloaded the near 30 scenes they have just from that series.
Looking further into the site, I noticed there’s no real connection with the theme. There are some older women with younger men scenes. I did not like those very much. I believe that older/younger porn interest is in older men with younger women or older women with younger women. I do not see the excitement from the younger men about having sex with older women. One of the series title tells a lot about the content. It is titled, “I was eighteen, fifty years ago”. Yeah, that’s not too sexy to even watch. There are others that are a little better, the “We wanna gang bang your mom”. It is better.
There are even fucking machines scenes on this site. The models are not that old. Maybe 25-30? I think it's just a site where DVDs have been thrown together as series. I can’t say it’s terrible or that bad. I did download around 50 scenes from it. I don’t even see how the cuckolding scenes fit the theme. Those are gorgeous top-shelf models. I do like the cuckold niche. There is pegging. The women look the same age as the men. Even those gangbang ones, those models look similar age as the men.
Once you get through those everything else seems to be just standard porn. There is interracial and I’m positive the male model is similar age. There is content here that is probably hard to find unless you join a site like Videobox, which I have no interest in trying to sift through. I did notice a series called, “Raunchy Redheads”. I am a natural redhead. We don’t get enough coverage in porn. I checked those out, those are okay, same feeling as the other scenes. One of the female models in the redhead scenes looks maybe 19. The video quality is the only other part to talk about. The scenes from 2010 and before are all 480p. The scenes after 2010, have mobile up to 1080p. It’s a good site to look at once or twice. The part I found funny. The older women on this site are really older. That’s not “mother” porn age. That’s granny. Take it for what it is. You may find some scenes you have misplaced. There are over 900 scenes. I would recommend it for those that like pegging and cuckolding. They have a good selection of those. I know neither of those niches are abundant. |
|
02-09-22 06:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
110
|
My MILFz
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All 85 videos can be downloaded in HD
Updates are twice a month
Part of huge network that includes over 75 studios
Epoch is the biller |
| Cons: |
Not much age difference between the models
Search not just for this site, but whole network
Just nitpicking, but only six lesbian scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
MILF refers to an age of about 25 to maybe 40. Actually I have even seen stars older than that called MILFs. I guess it means stars that are not young and not really ready to be called older. I am in that age range myself. I don’t think that I am young and innocent any longer and that does not bother me at all. I feel women get sexier as they get more confident with age.
When I logged onto the site, I found that the men were close to the age of the women more often than not. Even when the differences are noticeable, the scenes don’t play up the age difference much. I found a few scenes where it was a pairing of student with teacher or with the principal. Mostly though, it was not important. This is not a site that can be called older/younger. Besides those scenes, there were a few that had a concept, such as maid and boss. In those the age difference was not the center of the video.
There were a few things that I rather liked about the site. The first is that nearly all scenes are of models from the UK. I love those accents and admit a Brit with an accent makes me pay attention. Many of the guys are good looking, as well as nicely dressed and groomed. I could go for that. Many of the women looked slutty, which works for me as a porn fantasy. In contrast though, in some scenes the women were dressed in a very feminine manner with nice dresses or skirts, nylons, pretty panties etc.
Most of the sex was interesting and kept me watching. However, I feel no scene is ok without a great cumshot. Most of these were externals and I prefer those to internal ones. The guys were above average in size compared to guys in real life, but by porn standards nothing special. They got the job done. Even the internal scenes had an unusual focus when the women put their fingers inside and scooped out some cum.
There were only six lesbian scenes out of the 85 on the site. I thought they were at best just ok. I did see one lesbian four way, but the other scenes were all one on one, both the lesbian scenes as well as the boy/girl. There were a few scenes with black women and also a few with very dark black men with white women. The black men were nicely built down there and the women appreciated that.
If I had to sum up the sex parts, it was a better than ok site with a few quite hot videos. The quality was good at High Definition as the best on offer and this comes with a huge network. |
|
10-19-21 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
Next Door Buddies
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme.
Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it.
Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips.
Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women.
Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features. |
| Cons: |
Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys.
Scenes are repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it!
The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex.
The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like. |
|
12-08-21 02:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Next Door Casting
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses.
There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex.
The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads.
The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos.
Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women. |
| Cons: |
I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested.
One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part.
The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about.
The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex.
the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones.
I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked. |
|
12-08-21 02:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
113
|
Next Door Male
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Still continues to be one of the best solo men sites around.
Male models are amateurs or were when filmed.
Great network for straight women and gay men.
I don’t know if this is something recent, but the network is now owned by Gamma.
Very good quality videos and pictures. You can also download all you want.
Over 500 scenes of male solo porn is a big collection, but only to first time members. |
| Cons: |
No updates, which is now making 500 scenes seem like not that many scenes.
Solo male porn is starting to become stale to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
This was one of my highest, if not, highest rated gay/solo men networks. All the good parts are still there, but the bad parts are being accentuated. It’s quite possibly the most basic concept in porn. A guy sits down or stands, takes his pants off and masturbates. There is nothing really wrong with it. It’s just, in my last review of this network, I mentioned the lack of plot or story, was wearing on me, but due to the network having so many solo scenes, I looked over the overall effort.
I also noted in my 2021 review, the network dropped from nearly 1,000 scenes down to 550 or so. They haven’t added much if any to their collection. In 2021, I was new to the network and impressed with such a large collection of solo male porn, but in late 2024, the large collection is maybe medium or average.
The videos are downloadable as are the photos. Both are unlimited downloads and the videos go up to HD level, while the pictures are good quality and downloadable as zip files.
Now, we are in 2024 and the excitement of finding such a large collection of solo male scenes has worn off. I’m taking a different view of the network. We have this average sized collection, especially considering it claims to have over 20 sites on it and the scenes are flat out boring and dull. I have enough experience watching female solo porn to say, I think female solo porn can get away with unexciting models and performances. If the model is pretty enough and has a nice body, maybe nothing else is needed? The models on Next Door Male are very attractive, most are muscular or masculine, maybe is a better word. But, they’re also boring, repetitive and saying the same things, if they even talk at all.
The most obvious recommendation is for people that have never joined it. You will at least get around 600 videos of solo men. I’m a two time member and while there are scenes I either missed or didn’t notice, I can’t say I’m going to be downloading anything from the network.
I will add for reference: I have not been as into male solo porn as I used to be. It’s one reason I rejoined this network. It was one of my highest rated. I wanted to see if I’m just getting tired of the niche or if it’s just the lack of progression in the niche.
It’s still as good of a collection of solo, masculine men, you will likely find on the internet. I used to not mind that the scenes were plotless and had minimal dialouge, but I do expect more now.
The way I am going to score this is to say for me, the network would be lucky to score 75, but since we are reviewing for potential members, I will still give it an 85. That is 9 points lower than I scored it in 2021. Gamma’s involvement in the network isn’t even noticeable unless you’ve joined other Gamma sites and seen the pop-up that offers a promo. Take it, it’s a good one and includes downloads. |
|
10-08-24 09:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
114
|
Next Door Male
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biggest male masturbation site I have ever seen!
There are 605 scenes on the site. The categories/tags only show 593 solo, but I haven’t seen a scene yet with anything except solo.
Videos are downloadable and unlimited. There are also downloadable photo zips.
A lot of the guys seem to be straight/bisexual and masculine.
The guys make masturbating look like an artform, ball rubbing, slow strokes, twisting strokes, who knew you could do that much with male masturbation?
You don’t need a story when you can look at the pictures and know what the story is about. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating, but with 605 scenes, it will take me several months just to download those.
More talking could help, but it could also hurt. I think that’s something gay porn site may face a bigger problem with than straight sites. (Personality shows, effeminate/masculine shows) |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t think there is a site like this anywhere on the internet. I don’t know if it’s aimed at women or gay men. Maybe that’s another reason the guys shouldn’t talk much? The scenes are simple which is something of a complaint. I would at least like to know what the guy is thinking about while masturbating. Or maybe I wouldn’t, especially if it’s not what I want to think he’s thinking about. This is such a new, unique site to me.
The scenes have a simple flow and purpose to them. It’s a guy that needs to cum. There are zero production values. The guy lays down or sits down. Gets hard, pulls his dick out and starts stroking it. I have heard men say women have it easier with masturbation. Not based on these scenes. These guys stroke along for 8-15 minutes, make a mess, clean it up and scene is over. There is hardly no change from positions, unlike female solo, where the female goes from missionary, up on knees, to give better views. These guys mostly stay in one position. There are some scenes where the guy will also play with his butthole, but those are not common.
The part I find most interesting are the guys. A lot of these guys do not give me the feeling of them being gay or bisexual. There are hairy chests and bellies, not really a lot of muscular guys or really big guys. Most are in the average male body size category. A lot have beards. One part I wasn’t expecting is most of these guys are not much more than average in dick size. I prefer that even in porn. The guys are (just based on my eyes) 5.5” to 6.5” and only a few look to have a large circumference. I am probably not thinking about the name of the site. It is Next Door Male. Maybe that is the whole goal? These are the guys that live next door and not professional porn stars?
If I was going to critique it, which I really don’t want to since I enjoy the site so much, it would just be to add something to the scenes. Maybe have the guy watching porn? Looking at sexy pictures? I know enough men to know that it’s not as normal for a man to just lay down and start masturbating as it is for a woman. But that is what these guys do. Some of the scenes do have the guy looking at something, but you can’t see what. That is the only major negative critique I have. It makes it feel like not the guy next door and instead, the guy that is just rubbing one out to get paid. I don’t know much about this network or if they are going to start updating it again. Currently, the whole network seems close to dead. The size of this site and the network at least gives it a few months’ value. I believe it could appeal to both straight women and gay men, which is the demographic porn needs to improve their focus on. One of my new favorite sites. |
|
12-08-21 02:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
115
|
Next Door Raw
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies.
Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it.
Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads.
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones. |
| Cons: |
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn.
The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really?
Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me. |
| Bottom Line: |
More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals.
The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died.
These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea. |
|
12-08-21 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
116
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly |
| Cons: |
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar. |
|
11-28-22 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
117
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly hardcore network in the Nubiles family of sites.
Most of the scenes are very unique and interesting.
A little over 1,200 scenes with photos, all are downloadable.
Updates every other day.
Model list, different site tabs, it all makes navigating this network much easier than you would expect.
Bills with CCBill |
| Cons: |
There's a lot of imbalance. Some sites on here, the niches they cover are very interesting, other ones feel just like any other softer hardcore site.
I still feel like Nubiles.net is better than all these sites combined. I'm not trying to compare them, I just think Nubiles.net captures the Nubile feeling, while this is more like a hardcore site that's trying to go away from the tried and true forum Nubiles.net established. |
| Bottom Line: |
I admit, I am a sucker for the "family" porn and they have a couple of those sites on here Stepsiblings Caught, Daddy's Lil Angel and Family Pies. I like the porn with stories more than the gonzo style. Or else I just feel like two people showed up, picked a check up and got naked. I want and even need a scene to convince me this is really happening and it's not because they're being paid.
Nubiles Porn does a good job of that most of the time. There are more sites, really just niches, in this network that I like than ones I don't like. Detention Girls reminds me of every lesbian porn I first saw when I first discovered porn. Who knew "Women in jail" a search topic for a research paper would bring up a porn site?
I think if there's one strong criticism it is that they don't let the scenes play out enough. There are exceptions and that's what hurts. There's a scene on Nubiles Porn called, "My Sexy Girlfriend S12 E:7" that is really great. The model is self-shooting herself in the car, teasing her boyfriend and they even make sure to have her film in portrait view which is one of the most annoying things a person can do, but it adds to the realism. This teasing and flirting takes up nearly half the scene and it makes it very believable. Other scenes start with the woman on the bed naked and the guy walks in the room naked. They don't even say hi.
The video quality is very good at up to 1080p and they offer something I like, they have a 720p version in mp4 and WMV, I can't see the difference in them and the WMV version is usually 200-300 MB less in size. The photos like nubiles.net are very crisp and clear and downloadable.
They have just over 850 models and some of what I would call the top level of teen models.
There are quite a few niches here including two in the petite niche and you also get access to Nubiles.net, which to me is the best teen site on the internet.
I got this membership during the Halloween deals and didn't expect to get Nubiles.net with it, but it does come with it. For whatever reason they don't list it on the Nubiles Porn page, you just have to type in nubiles.net and enter you login again. It think when it's all combined it's still the best deal I've found in porn. |
|
11-04-19 11:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
118
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cutest models ever!
Extremely high quality photos and videos
Navigation is simple
Tags, model search, model list, every possible way to find whar you like
No download limits
A site you could spend months on and still only be scratching the surface |
| Cons: |
My biggest con is very simple – inconsistency in performances
Network access adds value, but more so in quantity and niches. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubiles was the very first porn paysite I ever joined. I loved the softness of the content. It was a perfect site for me, a conservatively raised private school girl who was more curious about porn than I was open-minded about sexuality.
Many of the older scenes now were newer scenes back when I first joined and what a critic sees as too softcore for current porn standards, was pushing all my boundaries. I loved the content. I was being gifted a view of other young women finding their sexuality. The fact it's a filmed video never really registered with me. My own narrow-mindedness towards sex was causing me to view these softcore scenes as young women experimenting with themselves sexually.
Nubiles still captures that innocence. It's us viewers dealing with oversaturation of porn and desensitized minds seeing the innocence as a negative. Many of the models are undoubtedly on camera for the first time in their young lives and with each step we add, we add another first for the models. First time being nude on camera. First time masturbating for a camera. I myself have been critical of Nubiles, but with this membership, I'm realizing the content is just as hot now as it was ten plus years ago, but it's my mind now expecting more.
Nubiles.net is a simple site with a simple concept. They have the cutest collection of models. They show these adorable models experiencing their first time sharing their sexuality on camera. If that sounds great, you will love the content!
The best part is there are no problems to report. The pictures come downloadable in zips. The videos are downloadable with multiple resolutions being available. There are no download limits. The navigation is as simple or complicated as you want it to be. There are tags. A model list and you can type in a search.
Things have changed since the first time I joined Nubiles.net. You now receive an entire network with Nubiles.net. The other network sites give some.variety to the Nubiles.net content. Most of the content on Nubiles is solo-based. The network adds hardcore content. I can fully see and understand the value the network adds. With that said, the network does not help or hurt my opinion of nubiles.net. If I get bored with the solo scenes, it is nice to be able to find hardcore ones, but for me, it creates the situation I started this review out with. It starts to desensitize you towards the solo content.
That is not as negative as it may sound. It is me saying I think Nubiles.net is fine on its own. When I first started joining paysites, solo and softcore porn sites were the majority. Now, with hardcore and more and more extreme porn sites, softcore and solo has become its own little special niche.
Years of now watching gaping asses and triple penetrations reminds me just masturbating on camera is as much for some of these younger models than gaping asses is for the more experienced models. I just needed that perspective again and am really happy to say Nubiles is easily one of the best porn sites I have joined. |
|
12-07-24 03:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
119
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It was the first porn site I joined, and the first porn site I reviewed, still a favorite but not without reservations.
There are 2,529 models on Nubiles.net.
Includes a network, Nubiles Porn, with 16 sites.
The site primarily focuses on solo content of young (or young looking) models, with some lesbian and male/female content.
Everything included is high quality (pictures, videos) and as far as I know the downloads are unlimited.
The biller is CCBill, there was an unchecked cross-sale to Nubiles Films. |
| Cons: |
This is a technical con, you’re most-likely going to join through Nubiles Porn. Of their banner list of sites there is no listing for Nubiles.net, the best site they have. Look at it however you want.
The excess of “new” sites they have includes quite a few you do not get access to without joining separately.
The advertisements for not only their other sites, but other sites too. When you sign-in, it’s an advertisement page that you have to scroll to the bottom of to get to Nubiles.net or Nubiles Porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
The old saying goes, “Absence makes the heart grow fonder”. I can see that in some ways with my first visit to Nubiles in 2 years, but I also can say there’s a reason I wasn’t a member over the last 2 years.
The quality of the site has never been up for question. They run a great site with multiple weekly updates (it’s not as consistent as it used to be), their videos cover everything except 4K, starting at 270p and going up to 1080p. Their pictures even rival the top photography porn sites. The site is easy to use (once you get the ad page out of the way) and the models give you a blend of precarious and innocent to curious and going wild. It’s typically what I would expect from women in this age range. And there are over 2,500 of those models.
There is a staleness that creeps in every few months of being a member. The male/female scenes they have are just as well not watched. Those are as cookie-cutter and rudimentary as any I have seen.
None of this is really a surprise to me. I first joined Nubiles in 2009. It was the very first porn site I paid to join. I believe the content they are producing now is very similar to the 2009 content. There’s not a dropoff. It’s just there’s not any real improvements either. If you considered it perfect in 2009, you could still consider it perfect. I just don’t. I don’t even know if I considered it perfect in 2009. I considered it watchable. Porn was new to me. I grew up in Catholic schools and Nubiles was, possibly insultative for me to say -- a “nice” porn site. Not nice in the “great” way, but in the “safe” way.
As the years passed, new “bonus” sites started showing up on Nubiles, and to show how well I remember 2009, there were two bonus sites with it back then. I don’t remember the names, one was a Spring Break site and one with a solo model site who was also featured on Nubiles named Katrina. Those are still accessible with your membership, I do believe, if you can find them. Things then changed to Nubiles Porn, an entire network of Nubiles sites. I won’t even try to come up with an explanation for why they don’t show Nubiles.net included.
The content is still 2009. And maybe that’s what they’re going for. I once had a professor who made the comment, “Being a professor of freshmen college Algebra is great, each year a new group of 18 year old young women are delivered to my classroom. It’s like I never age.” Hopefully, his dark humor didn’t ruin the point.
Nubiles for what it is still delivers. They have some of the cutest, sexiest, most innocent, most believable, new, fresh models. Most of the scenes are solo teasing that evolve into masturbation. It’s a tried and true formula that has worked for nearly 20 years. The question becomes -- when do you or I start to feel like we’ve been here hundreds of times before? That has made Nubiles polarizing to me. It shouldn’t hurt the view of the site especially to new or newer members. I spent years as a member. I do believe the multiple sites, the sister “network” Nubile Films, the around 10 standalone “premium” sites they have released helps in that polarizing feeling. It’s the feeling of Nubiles.net is their site to start at. They include the 15 or 16 bonus sites in Nubiles Porn and you can try those which offer at least slightly different niches and genres. You’re then enticed to try Nubiles Films. If you like some of the Nubiles Film content you’ll give the premium standalone sites a try. Still worth a join and a short stay, but just doesn’t have the staying power for more than 3 months at a time for me. |
|
07-14-21 02:05am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
120
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thank you, I used several PU veterans reviews as a guideline for my review, including yours.
|
06-10-19 11:13am
|
Reply
121
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
StrokeOff's Reply
I am glad you found my review helpful. I tried to focus on the parts I believe Nubiles.net does better at than the Nubiles Porn network. Most reviews I see of Nubiles are more focused on the network.
|
06-10-19 11:11am
|
Reply
122
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Shen's Reply
Thank you, I hope to have more reviews over the next few weeks.
|
06-10-19 11:07am
|
Reply
123
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thank you! I was surprised when I received the email with the gift card in it.
|
06-10-19 11:05am
|
Reply
124
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thank you, I have read a lot of reviews here and hope it shows. I do not like admitting it, but I can be closeminded in the genres I like. I am trying to expand my breadth of interest in porn. I enjoy all naked parts. I just do not like some of the actions once naked lol!
|
06-05-19 02:03am
|
Review
125
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site is in its 16th year of operation. There are 2,213 models. One is as cute as the next.
Innocence lost before your eyes. My favorite part of this site are the shy and sweet models.
Minimal tattoos, implants or other body modifications.
Non-extreme masturbation.
Video quality is superb, but I wish the photo sets were more vivid in colors.
I have been an on-again, off-again member for 10 years. I like that they have not made any drastic changes. |
| Cons: |
It would not hurt to have more body types. Just because they are barely legal teens does not mean they have to all be slim.
More outdoor sets would be a welcome change.
Maybe have some of the willing models to go more extreme with their masturbation |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubiles.net was the first porn site I joined. I sign up for 3 months each year. This is my 10th year.
It first captured my attention with its name. A former employer was said to hire only "nubile employees". As a former sex recluse the innocence of the models, their shyness and the non-extreme masturbation kept me around as a member.
I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman or relationship with a woman, but I would consider it with some of the models on Nubiles. It is non-intimidating pornography. I would not group it with sites like Met-Art, but it is closer to Met-Art than a hardcore site.
My only disappointment with the site is the inclusion of hardcore content. The hardcore scenes are not like hardcore porn we usually see, but why even risk losing your established niche?
I think with the site now operating as part of the Nubiles Porn network they should only have solo scenes on Nubiles.net.
The site updates as much as entire networks. There are 2 photo set updates per day and 2 videos per day. If you catch a sale price you can have access to the whole network for around $10-$15.
The models are almost all slender. I would like to see chubby, shy, innocent models too. I have noticed sites like to create an image of what fits a type of model. They do get stuck on trying to stay within the image.
The video quality only needs work if you require 4K. I consider their videos some of the crispest and highest quality available. My complaint about the picture colors is splitting hairs. I prefer warm colors in photos. I am sure others prefer cooler colors like Nubiles uses. Most do not know the difference!
The site offers more than 13,000 video or photo sets. The videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. The photos can be downloaded in zip files.
The models range from amateurs you will not see anywhere else to early-career pros. There is a focus on natural. Tattoos have become more common in recent years, but are not required like some sites. Implants are not common; neither is too much make-up or formal clothing.
I believe it is one of the best values in pay porn. You also receive access to Nubiles Porn. A network including various niches. I would join Nubiles.net with or without the network access. |
|
06-03-19 12:10am
Replies (12)
|
|
