| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of porn’s most marketed stars … Joanna Angel
Alternative, goth, tatted, all apply to nearly every scene on Joana’s sites
There are 237 videos to download
Site’s navigation is straightforward and simple
Very hardcore in some of the scenes
Some of the videos even have 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
There are no picture zip downloads
Joanna isn’t in every scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I first was introduced to Joanna Angel’s content on the Gamma-owned Burning Angel. There are lots of reasons for me to like her. She’s about the same size I am. She hasn’t succumbed to plastic surgery. She’s around 40 and she’s never wanted to fit in. I don’t know if her success in porn shows popularity or she’s just that good of a performer. She is one of the most prolific female porn stars as well.
This site is very much a solo site about Joanna, but there are friends or guests too. The sex varies from heavy tease (my favorite) to all out hardcore sex (my least favorite). Joanna, despite her tiny frame, shows the strength and power of a confident woman. She does it without having to rely on stories and plots to show her strength.
The videos are mostly downloadable in 1080p and 720p, but there are some that can be downloaded in 4K.
There are picture sets, but those are not downloadable. The site is a back to the basics type site. There are four filters to separate the content. You have scenes, pornstars, tags and shop.
That is even simpler for me. I’m not interested in the friends or other pornstars. The tags aren’t helpful to me and I don’t think I’m interested in anything from the shop.
Joanna shows off some of her skills including tease and denial of a guy, not for sure if that’s her husband (he’s a pornstar) or not. The scenes with Joanna have near perfect chemistry and good tension. I had the same feeling with Burning Angel scenes as scenes from this solo site. If Joanna isn’t in the scene, I’m not interested in it.
There are no bonuses or extra content. You just get Joanna’s site and nothing else. I’m okay with that, but I think I’ve shown I’m a huge fan of Joanna.
She is considered one of the most important models of alt porn and is considered one of the pioneers of the genre. All while looking 25-30, when she’s really 40+. I take every scene she is in as her chance to impress the viewer. I don’t think she’s let anyone down very much. This site is required for those that are Joanna Angel fans. I would even say it’s better than Burning Angel, if you’re just in it for the Joanna content. |
|
06-11-23 03:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
77
|
Joy Mii
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A pretty porn site where the models are all pretty and have a natural look.
Smaller than I expected with only 193 models, but they are 193 very pretty models.
720 video scenes and for some reason, 719 photo sets. All are downloadable and excellent quality.
I think it's important to stress how pretty and natural the models on here are. I haven't seen any implants and if there's tattoos, I've just missed them.
They have solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes.
Updates twice a week.
It has been around for a long time. I guess it's why I expected it to be a bigger site, but this could go into quality over quantity. |
| Cons: |
I didn't realize this is a softer hardcore site. A lot of the scenes in this softer hardcore genre just come off as generic to me and that is just an opinion.
It needs more variety. The scenes have these gorgeous models in them and it's like they're the sexy part and the sex is just the bonus.
The scenes are just straight to the point and short. Some are less than 20 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My pros/cons might look like I don't like this site, but it's not true. This is a good, very straightforward porn site with some really gorgeous models in hardcore action.
The site has been around for almost 10 years, so they have only averaged about 70 videos and 70 photo sets per year. What I find myself running into here is I find I model I really like and they only have a couple scenes of her, while other models have 10+ scenes. That is subjective to my taste, but it doesn't help me enjoy the site.
These are all professional models as far as I can tell. They look familiar and there are even a few big name models.
They have 350 male/female scenes and some of those are threesomes. The other 370 scenes are lesbian or solo. There's no way to separate the solo from lesbian scenes.
The navigation for the site works well except that they list solo and lesbian together. The model list isn't the most friendly, it is a vertical scrolling page with one model per section. Clicking on any model brings up a list of her scenes and photo sets.
The video quality is one of the brighter spots for the site. All videos have 1080p, 720p, 540p, 270p all in .MP4 and a 720p .WMV version. The streaming player works very well.
The photo sets have three downloadable versions, quickview 534x800, collector's edition 800x1200 and poster size 6000x4000. That's a big difference and the file sizes show it. The first two were 8-12 MB each, the poster size is 400 MB. These are photo sets, but they could pass for screen captures as they are from a video scene.
I would compare the site to Sex Art, X-Art, and just about any site with the word Art in it.
Whether my tone has sounded negative or not shouldn't go against the site. I am just a little disappointed in what I was expecting. It not a bad site, but I also don't think it's a great site. |
|
11-26-19 12:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
78
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Joined along with their site Girl Girl
Very good hardcore site
Easy to use and navigate
4K downloads on newer videos and 1080p or 720p also
Zip downloadable photo sets
Huge site with regular updates still coming |
| Cons: |
Hardcore sites usually bore me and this one did as well.
I mainly joined this to get access to Girl Girl.
Most if not all of the models are pros. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was joining Girl Girl and received an offer to add Jules Jordan. Both are owned and operated by the same company. It was a good deal for the two sites.
Jules Jordan content is similar to most hardcore sites and DVDs. There are some scenes with stories and plots, but nothing groundbreaking. The site’s biggest selling point is hardcore porn that’s not too hardcore and violent. I do know this can be a pro or con depending on the person: Nearly all or all of the models are pros. The reason I consider that a con is if you’ve been a member of other hardcore sites like Evil Angel, Backed, Tushy etc, the scenes here feature most of the same models and the action isn’t much different. The flip side of that is you do have pros performing and that means good performances (for porn). Personally, I prefer amateur models, especially females, but I knew what I was getting when I joined this site so I won’t deduct any points.
Their technical side is impressive with 4K downloads on all new scenes and even the older ones have 720p and/or 1080p, Their above average quality picture sets can be downloaded in zip files. The site packs in the quantity with over 10,000 scenes on over 2,500 DVDs. The videos are high quality in technical quality and the action is above average for a hardcore site.
You may want more from your hardcore scenes. The stories and plots are limited in scope and are usually just based on the niche (anal, oral, etc). The site is easy to use considering how big it is and the navigation works well.
Besides having over 10,000 scenes they have regular updates still coming in. I would list no bonus content as a con, but with the bundle I received, Girl Girl was included and I found it to be one of the best lesbian sites I’ve ever joined. They could work on adding some variety and improving storylines, but that’s not a big deal – in my opinion – to hardcore fans, which I am not.
I will compare it directly to Evil Angel and say I prefer the Jules Jordan hardcore scenes. But Jules Jordan doesn’t offer the variety of niches Evil Angel has. It’s a recommended site for hardcore fans. Just don’t expect anything amateur or homemade. |
|
01-10-23 02:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
79
|
Kink University
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with the Kink Network
Unique concept. This is the only site I ever heard of that explains the concepts behind BDSM porn.
Great lineup of porn talent.
A lot of model diversity.
Uses tag system for searching.
High production values |
| Cons: |
This site stopped updating in 2016.
The best quality is HD, not full HD or 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
I wouldn't call my overall experience on the Kink Network a favorite. I had to dig through the whips, ball gags, spiked walls, jump over vats of fire and dodge the men in black rubber masks just to find a few sites I liked on the entire network. This one stood out, if nothing more, than a unique site with a premise I haven't seen used on many sites. I really don't know of any other sites that do it.
Kink University describes itself as a place to learn BDSM technical skills and theories. Each video update is a seminar on a specific sex or BDSM topic. This is a channel on Kink, well known for its BDSM specialty. With 112 lessons, this is a great place to learn everything you always wanted to learn about sex and how scenes are made. It is great for advice on topics that you may want to learn about. The teacher and director is Danarama.
Some themes that are covered are, of course, bondage related such as hoods, straitjackets, suspension techniques, collaring, flogging, device bondage, caning, pegging, sensory deprivation, clothespins, humiliation and ropes. There is even a video introduction to BDSM.
Some of the topics are sexual such as dildos, handjobs, lesbian sex, toys, medical play, rimming, bisexual sex MMF, oral sex taste test, titty fucking, pornstar sex hacks and secret tricks, foot worship, how to have a threesome, erotic shaving, edging-orgasm control and denial for maximum climax, how to make her squirt, strap on sex-vaginal, anal and oral, fisting, anal sex, dominant oral sex, blowjobs and deep throat, finger banging and g spot mastery, cunnilingus, dirty talk, and pussy fisting.
The site itself is easy to navigate. It uses a very helpful tag system to help you find your favorite topics. Unfortunately, you cannot tag the videos as your favorites. The downloads were fairly fast and the files not that large by today’s standards, as the best quality is HD. When these were new updates, these were state of the art. There are a few screenshots for each update, but not real photosets.
Considering these are lessons, it would have been very helpful to have a transcript for each lesson. This way you can review the lesson without being distracted by the engaging visuals. The teacher/director is not very animated either. He gives the facts, but his voice is sometimes a bit too monotone for my taste.
Other than that the videos are very complete and the topics very interesting. Personally, I got a lot out of the BDSM lessons. The large number of sex lesson videos fascinated me and are well worth the price of admission. Some of those things I have done in real life and many others are featured in porn scenes that I like. If you want to see a guide to pegging a guy, they have a great one here. You too can become an expert or maybe just pretend to be one. It is a shame they don’t offer certificates for class excellence.
In this university you enjoy the classes and can practice the lessons at home with a partner. That can make for some exciting homework. You will want to be prepared in case of a surprise quiz. |
|
08-10-21 03:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite site on my favorite network.
Women watching, joining, instructing a guy to masturbate. She’s usually clothed.
Comes with Pure CFNM, a full network of CFNM sites.
Believable very attractive females with average guys.
Unlimited downloadable videos and pictures.
The theme makes a story useless. You know the story just from what you see. |
| Cons: |
Tries too hard to stick to the CF part of CFNM.
Some scenes go into degrading the males. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has improved over the years. Most of the improvement is in the recognition of their scenes becoming redundant due to the CFNM genre. Adding Lady Voyeur to CFNM is, in theory, a perfect blend, but we are still talking about porn where men far outnumber female viewers. This niche sticks to one or more women watching a man masturbate. I’m sure there are men who wouldn’t enjoy this type of porn – especially when you factor in the degradation.
Having said that, Lady Voyeur, typically shows the female as being very aroused and even entertained while watching the man masturbate.
There are scenarios that pop up in every scene like will the guy’s cum hit the woman? Will the female get more involved? Will the female masturbate too? It’s one of the few niches that keeps an open window for what “could” happen in each scene.
There still is the problem of this type of porn doesn’t leave much room for a lot of fetishes or niches. While it is called Voyeur, it’s not really voyeur other than the woman watching the man. da room. There is nothing blocking the woman from seeing the man or him seeing her looking at him. That’s why I said the voyeur part Is questionable if it’s really voyeur.
You also get full access to Pure CFNM, by far and away, the biggest and best CFNM network. The downloads are unlimited and there are photosets with most scenes. I just enjoy the question of how involved will the female get in the scene. The scenes can be downloaded in high definition and the photos are high resolution. I do think they could make the scenes longer and add more variety to the Lady Voyeurs scenes, but it’s a minor complaint for a site that does a lot more right than wrong. The access to Pure CFNM is just a major bonus.
This is a great deal if you’re new to CFNM. While the different niches in the genre are limited, those are still enough to change things up so that you can enjoy it without feeling like it’s redundant. You’ll only be disappointed if you’re expecting intercourse or oral sex. Which is something I like about Lady Voyeurs, you will see the women tease those and maybe give the guy a little oral. It makes every scene worth watching from beginning to end. The key there is CFNM is not an action. Porn usually specifies its niche or genre by the name of the site like “Only Blowjob”. Pure CFNM just tells you there will be clothed females and nude males. The actions are not mentioned. |
|
10-11-22 07:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
81
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
Your reply is one of the points I was making. I think porn directors are missing out on an entire audience. I know at least a couple of men that enjoy masturbating for women. I know it would be popular with straight women. I think gay men would like it from the voyeuristic side of watching a straight man masturbate for a straight woman. Porn tries so hard to make everything blatantly obvious and I think it is where porn is starting to fail. If it's supposed to be for gay enjoyment no one else is going to enjoy it that much. The same with straight sex. A gay man would need a lot of imagination to watch a man and woman have vaginal intercourse and see himself as the woman but a gay man could fantasize being the woman watching the straight man masturbate. I always thought straight men would have trouble with lesbian porn. There are no penises so what role do they see themselves in? Porn has to figure out that the world and sexuality has changed a lot over the last 10-15 years. Porn hasn't changed a lot.
|
07-10-19 08:51pm
|
Reply
82
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I just noticed a lot of typos in my previous reply, but the site says I can no longer edit it.
|
07-02-19 10:04pm
|
Reply
83
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Maybe I am a little ahead of myself. My reply to LKLK linked to a site named Straight Guys! There are numerous reports coming out about women's use of porn. The percentages are still favoring the men 70% to 30%, however, women spend more time watching porn per day than men do. As money hungry as the porn industry is it seems like they would be trying to get in on the new audience. The sites I have seen for women are like the lovecore sites for men. It could be my own past of being a sexual recluse, but I do not know any woman that fantasizes about having regular sex. I don't like to discuss patients, but I can vaguely make a blanket statement that the regular sex is a big part of marital problems that I hear about. I don't know when it became more normal for women to masturbate for their boyfriend or husband, but I do think there is an obvious connection to porn. Maybe the boyfriend or husband likes watching women masturbate in porn? The wife or girlfriend wants him to be as into her and the woman in the porn.
I look at it that way. If porn makes it more normal for men to masturbate in front of women there would be something new for couples to improve their sex life with. I also think where using gay or even just smaller, thinner men, it does not strike the female's sexual instincts. Some (one on here on PU) high level psychologists believe we have created fantasies that only make us happy inside. That would not trigger as must lust as a fantasy should. Women, in my experience, have way more sexual triggers than men do. It just seems there is a large amount of content just waiting to be made. I do know some men are more aroused by watching their girlfriend or wife watching porn that turns her on more than watching porn aimed at the man. If only I had the money to start such a network! I will check the thread out.
|
07-02-19 07:38pm
|
Reply
84
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
No one really knows how limited the appeal is. The estimations have 30% of porn viewers being women. The two most searched porn sites by women are "Lesbians" and "Gay Porn". There is not a category in porn for "Straight men solo" or "Men masturbating for women". If females made up a smaller group than 30% it would make sense not to try it, but considering there are sites focused on women using enemas, I do not believe that has the market potential of "straight men solo".
Like in the comparison you started with. Is it normal, in real life, for women to go up and masturbate in front of men? There are over 2,000 sites with women masturbating in full scenes on them. Even if the solo men category was based on percentages, that would mean there should be at least 500 solo men sites. I'm not one of the women that hates all porn or thinks the porn industry is unfair. I just believe until someone takes a chance and gives porn aimed at straight women a chance there is an entire market being left untouched. I can't say this for sure, but I believe gay men would also enjoy seeing straight men masturbating.
|
07-02-19 07:18pm
|
Review
85
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unique site included in a network of CFNM (Clothed Female Nude Male) sites.
This one focuses on women watching men masturbate. The women do not always stay clothed, but by having some of the women taking their clothes off it doubles the chances of seeing something new from scene to scene.
When I think of "porn for women" this site is what I think of.
Unlike other sites of this type and in the CFNM genre, there is very little belittling of the men which is much more realistic to me. I do not know many women that would make fun of a man's size if he was masturbating over her body.
The included network access has 5 more sites in it and a total of 1,300 scenes. This site has 226 scenes.
There are downloadable photos and screencaps to go along with the videos.
Finishing the pros with it is one of the few sites I know of with believable straight solo men for women's enjoyment. |
| Cons: |
It is a narrow niche. I am not for sure if straight men would enjoy it since it is a man masturbating. I am not for sure if gay men would enjoy since there are women in the scenes.
The network's navigation can impede the individual sites. Clicking videos on Lady Voyeurs takes you to all the videos on the whole network. It can be worked around, but even knowing it, I still make the mistake. |
| Bottom Line: |
Along with a couple of my female friends I have looked for sites with men masturbating. There are some in the gay genre. Some of those are good. Some of those are clearly not directed at women. This is a niche the female produced sites are not interested in filming. I view porn as a precursor to fantasy. If I see it in a video, the next fantasy entering my mind will be whatever was in the video.
I do not know the percentage of guys willing to masturbate in front of woman in real life (not on a webcam or on Facetime), but I want to say it is low. So much hardcore porn has the guy pulling out and masturbating for 20 seconds to cum. Why not have scenes where men see a woman and can't stop themselves from masturbating right in front of her? In the right hands (it was kind of intended), this niche could be the one that breaks porn's hold on porn for "man's enjoyment" and gives women something to fantasize about and enjoy.
As porn currently is, us females get to choose between watching the same hardcore porn intended for male's enjoyment, two cute college girls doing what we are sure did not really happen when we were in college or porn intended for gay men to enjoy.
Lady Voyeurs helps change that, but it could be better.
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman.
It is a regular feeling I have when watching porn. There is so much more they could do. My score shows I do like this site a lot. I just wonder how much of it is because there are not many sites with this niche?
The minimal demeaning and belittlement also scores points for this site. They have a newer scene with the belittling. I do not know why. They have a another site on the network called, "Hey, Little Dick" shouldn't the scene titled, "It's so small" be on that site? Porn is in a quandary. We do not have to abuse and hate men to make porn for women. If a man was brave enough to masturbate in front of woman, and her response was "It's so small" does that not continue to lower the image of women? Tasteless is the word.
Stick with the pretty models being turned on by the brave to-fro-to-fro-to-fro man. Teasing him and even telling him what she wants him to do besides to-fro.
I would not rate the network any higher than this site. One of the other sites was named earlier, "Hey, Little Dick", another is "Girls Abuse Guys", the big site on the network "Pure CFNM" is good, but the themes are inconsistent, the site "CFNM Games" is on the network too and it goes between eye-rolling bad scenes to good scenes. Really, "Hey guy, lay down with your boner pointing up, we are going to compete by throwing hoops at your boner!" The poor guy must not have had sex in years to be talked into that.
I think it is important to point out these dumb/bad/belittling scenes because it is where you see the female models inability to act. A few look like they enjoy tormenting the guy, but most look uncomfortable or like they are auditioning for a B-grade horror movie.
That is why Lady Voyeurs scores an 88 and it would be my score for the network. The Lady Voyeurs scenes with the woman watching, being turned on, taking her clothes off, masturbating too are very believable and rely on zero acting ability. Could it be called "Instinctual Porn"?
The video quality is good, you can download 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not like their streaming player. It crashes my browser 1 out of 3 times I try to use it. I usually will skim-stream a scene to see if it is worth a download. The amount of models on the network is around 600. They have a variety of size, race and attitudes in both male and female models.
It is a good value if you are looking for this type of content. There is not a lot of it out there. |
|
07-01-19 12:59am
Replies (11)
|
Review
86
|
Leg Sex
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first attractions to porn.
Pretty and cute models
Leg and foot fetishists will be happy
Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options.
Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus).
Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. |
| Cons: |
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. |
|
03-07-23 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
Lets Go Bi
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Probably my favorite niche, bisexual men with a woman.
All videos have 4K downloads.
Only 43 scenes, but two updates per month have it growing it fast enough.
Photo zips for all scenes, downloadable and 2700x4000 resolution.
Little bit of everything mixed in these scenes like gay couple meets bisexual couple.
Some very attractive female models. I will go into that in the bottom line as I think it’s very important to this niche. |
| Cons: |
Scenes are not long enough as seen by a couple of the orgy scenes split into two parts. It’s like they can only record 30 minutes at a time.
Enough cheesiness in some of these scenes to make a sandwich. Guys giving the thumbs up over another guy giving them a blowjob? No idea what they’re saying or even what language they are speaking. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m going to start this with my explanation for the need of at least one very attractive female in a bisexual men scene. Somewhere in a woman’s mind, we all like to think if we walked up on two gay or bisexual men having sex, their attraction to us would make them stop and include us. It’s similar to the thinking behind women who try to “turn” gay men to straight. I believe adding a very attractive woman to these scenes makes it more believable. The reality of most of these scenes is these are gay men. You can maybe see where I’m going with that? These gay men see this very attractive woman, carnal desires take over and they just have to try her out. There is a bisexual, 2 part orgy on this site that has multiple very attractive women in it. It makes you think the other way too. Would a straight man be willing to do something sexual with another man if it meant he would get to have to have sex with this beautiful woman? That’s why I like bisexual porn so much. It gives me something to think about and wonder if it really happened would the straight guy lose his inhibitions or would the gay guys become bisexual for that beautiful woman?
This site does a really good job of presenting such scenarios. Some of the scenes are not that good. It’s clearly porn and those two gay guys are willing to have sex with the woman for the paycheck. It’s the other scenes that makes a site like this very appealing to me. This studio does seem to specialize in these harder to find niches. To show an example of how broad some of these scenes reach, one of the orgy scenes has these tags: Blowjob, cumshot, handjob, big tits, anal, small tits, mature, bbw, granny and rimjob. It’s just a mixture that to me is highly unpredictable IF put in this situation in real life.
The site has 43 videos and 43 photo sets. The downloads on the videos have the 4K option on every video. Those also have the 540p, 720p, 1080p download options as well. The photo zip downloads have 2700x4000 photos and are interesting to look at. You see things you don’t notice in the video, especially the scenes with more than 4 people in them. As much as I like and appreciate sites like this, I don’t know if there’s a very big market for it. I’m not even for sure if the gay market is really into adding a female to the scene or a whole room of females. I don’t even know if it appeals to that many females. It is one of my favorite niches and maybe is my favorite when it comes to hardcore sex porn. I do want to add some of the cheesiness of the male actors is almost unforgivable. Really, a thumbs up for getting a blowjob from another man? Pretty sure you gave him a thumbs up when you didn’t stop him.
If one thing could be improved it is the masculinity of the males. Most of these men are effeminate, even the big, muscular ones and I think that does hurt the fantasy unless the woman is very attractive. I don’t know these models by their given names, but one of the females, she is in a couple of the scenes needs to be in every scene. I will also mention I like the way the orgy scenes setup. It’s usually everyone sitting together, one starts touching one, and it works its way into orgy instead of everyone just getting naked and having sex. It gives the feeling of some of the people needed enticement to join in and I like that. Very good site for those into bisexual men scenes and I want to say this one could reach a little further with a lot of pretty female models.
Top |
|
10-19-21 01:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
88
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good network that used to be great
Nearly all models are attractive
Easily searchable and overall navigation
A good mix of niches
You can almost always find a cheap promo price |
| Cons: |
Download limit of 25 videos per month
Picture sets are mediocre
A lot of the sites I remember from this network are no longer on this network |
| Bottom Line: |
I can remember joining Lets Doe It back when it was first being advertised. It was very good, even great. Possibly one of the most diverse networks in porn. Then they decided to split it up and moved 13 of the sites to Amateur Euro. That was bad enough, but then they decided to operate with download limits. I am almost positive, at one time, the download limit was 100 per month. It’s now 25.
I joined Lets Doe It just a few weeks ago for a very low promo price. I have visited the site 4 times and downloaded nothing. I believe download limits do that to a member’s interest. Instead of looking at videos and thinking about which ones you like and want to download, you end up looking at videos with the thinking of “eliminating” some so you won’t hit the download limit.
Lets Doe It’s potential was very high, but they have not improved their photo sets and it’s just starting to feel like a downward spiral.
The models are still very attractive, but the lack of stories in the videos, mediocre picture sets and restrictive download limits just saps a lot of the energy as a member.
I would like to say there’s still something great going on at Lets Do It, but I find it difficult to say that. If you find a model you like or a niche you like, you have to start focusing on not downloading too many videos. For what it’s worth, their other network, Amateur Euro has completely fallen off with no updates. Lets Do It at least does still update.
The videos can be downloaded in HD quality and are good enough. Other than those allowed 25 downloads, there’s just not much else to interest me. I doubt I will download any of the videos now and can say unless something improves, there’s little to no reason for me to return as a member. Your experience with the site may be better than mine. My score for it is partially based in the potential.
I do believe they could right the ship with a few changes, maybe even just raise the download limit to 50 or 100. I don’t remember their download limits being as restrictive as they are now and back when Lets Doe It first started, there were no download limits. If downloading doesn’t interest you then you can adjust the score accordingly. Otherwise, this is at best, an average network. |
|
11-07-23 12:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, playful, fun lesbian scenes.
Site updates twice per month and currently has 510 scenes.
All models are pretty or cute or a combination. Most are young and slim to medium build.
Alternating settings in the scenes breaks up what is a formulaic product.
Newest videos have downloads up to 4K. Picture sets are also high quality and downloadable.
The tags are useful (basic) and non-confusing like many sites use. |
| Cons: |
It is formulaic. The scenes last nearly the same amount of time from scene to scene. You see most of the same positions from scene to scene. The different settings at least present a hurdle to work around.
Not much dialogue and what dialogue there is, I can’t understand. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is very appealing to my eyes. The models are young, cute and pretty. It’s softcore to regular lesbian content. Lots of kissing, touching, giggling, some sex and the models are just as happy when the scenes end as they were when the scenes started.
The first site I ever joined was Nubiles. This site reminds me of the lesbian scenes on Nubiles. I feel like, as a few other PU reviewers have stated, I am starting to get too used to this style or porn. It is still good and can’t deny the models are some of the prettiest/cutest I have seen on a porn site, but I believe like a person that marries just for looks, what is left once you’re used to the looks?
I don’t think this site is one directly aimed at lesbians or even bicurious women. It’s more about the eye candy. There are double or triple (threesome scenes) the pretty, naked, sexual young women on your screen than usual. I shouldn’t say the dialogue is absent. Some of the models do speak English and these are their known words, “Yeah, yeah, oh fuck, yeah, yeah, just like that, yeah, yeah”. I call that not understandable since I am not there and not feeling it. This is a site that has been around a long time. The newer scenes do feature some women that speak that 7-word English vocabulary. The point of that is lesbian porn has improved greatly on even sites related to this one. It’s because the models are more descriptive in their language. Having never been with a woman. I do not know what it takes to make me say yes, yes, oh fuck. I believe this is an example of a site directed more at men. Where just watching these sexy, young women, get naked and roll around with each other IS enough. It still works for me, but I do think they need to improve the interaction between the models.
As I mentioned the site has been around look enough to have 510 scenes and to still be producing two updates per month. The videos have up to 4K. The age of the site is important in relation to the quality of the videos. There was a slowdown of updates on this site from the early to mid-2010s. The scenes during that time have 480p, 540p and 1080p. While the newer scenes have 9 download options. The scenes from before the slowdown top out at only 540p for downloads. Based on the number of pages, that looks like about 50% of the scenes only have up to 540p. I am not going to be that hard on the site. The newest scenes with the high quality downloads still equal in or around 250 and the only real flaw with those is the formulaic feeling. If you’re more into it for just seeing pretty, sexy women, you won’t notice the formulaic parts.
Good site that I believe has to improve in the dialogue to keep up with the newer lesbian sites. |
|
02-09-22 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
Lingerie Tales
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Zipped and downloadable photo sets.
You can also download the audio separately as well as read or download the sexy stories that she reads.
Uses a tag system for searching.
Pretty UK women with sexy accents
The site uses two very reputable billers, Epoch and CCBill
The site has 168 videos and photosets. |
| Cons: |
Hasn't updated since July 2017. However, the preview page promises weekly updates both videos and photos.
Nude, but not as explicit as I might like. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site describes itself as erotic stories read by sexy girls in and out of their lingerie. I liked the slow stripping by sexy models wearing sexy outfits. However, I don’t get very turned on by sexy words or stories. The stories read here were interesting and tasteful, but not vulgar in any way.
I like porn that appeals to my imagination, but here the scenes stretched just what my capacity is for using my imagination. Unlike most porn, the visuals helped to only a very small degree. The models are pretty British women who have classy accents. The action, such as it is, is them reading while very slowly stripping out of hot outfits. They all get to nude, but not all of them are explicit. I was left hoping for her to show more, but this site is very softcore visually.
You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. The stories were not very extreme and the language very softcore. It reminded me a lot of the stories in poorly written women's erotic novels. This is a typical line: “I feel his huge member pulsing through his jeans. I nearly convulse with the feeling.” I know I would not find the word member very stimulating. Maybe they should try being a bit more vulgar? I am sure this is not for everybody, but I expect that there is the target audience for this style of porn story writing. It just did not work for me.
I might have liked the concept if the models were masturbating while reading the stories. Show me a little passion and maybe I might feel turned on. If the model was not getting much out of it, how and why would I? If they were talking about a cock, why not act out the fantasy on a dildo?
There were some UK based pornstars that I have seen on other UK sites, such as Cherry Blush, Kate Anne and part Filipina Natalia Forrest. Just as most pornstars are not good actresses, not all can read text and tell a story in a sensual way. I felt that Natalia Forrest hit on all cylinders. She could melt ice with her storytelling. In total there are 40 pornstars on the site.
The site was simple to use and downloads very fast at about 90% of my maximum capacity. There are 168 videos and about as many photo sets. Photo sets are downloadable as zips shots from the videos. There was also a degree of erotic power in the audio. You can stream as well as download just the audio as an MP3 file. I have never seen that on any other site, but here it makes complete sense. You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. You can favorite the scenes. The site comes with no extras. I liked that the site uses Epoch and CCBill for billing. Both are trusted billers and make cancellation simple. I saw no prechecked cross sales, not even for their other sites. I joined using Paypal through CCBill. The site rebills automatically at the end of your subscription, so be sure to cancel early. |
|
08-10-21 03:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
91
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unique, interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes dumb, game sex scenes.
All amateurs and all exclusive.
Updates once per week, currently has 576 scenes on it.
Payment Processor is CCBill.
Wide variety of models by race and body type.
Covers solo, lesbian, male/female, group niches.
Doesn't feel staged. |
| Cons: |
Scenes can drag on before you get to the action.
There will definitely be some models (male and female) that everyone isn't attracted to. I see it as a plus. It adds to the authenticity.
No photos of any kind. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site after seeing a clip from it on a tube site. It's very straightforward. All games played have the strip basis. They have multiple games they play using everyday household objects to regular toys. It's like a modern take on strip poker. They mix it up by making you wonder if the loser is really the loser (guy has to give a beautiful amateur woman oral sex), they have fun in the scenes and you can see that. A lot of the models are shy and you can see the nervousness of having to take their clothes off. It just gives a good feeling of they are enjoying it even if it's embarrassing. I'm sure you could see similar games being played in dorm rooms, at adult parties and that makes this content fun for me. I could see myself getting stuck playing one of these games with a group of friends.
The video quality for an amateur site is excellent. No 4K, but they have 1080p going back to January 2014, the scenes prior to those have 720p. It is disappointing that they have no photos.
There's really nothing to the navigation since the scenes all have the same basis. The titles usually tell what game is being played. There are rock/paper/scissors scenes, scenes with a light duty taser directly pressed against the other person's pussy or dick and even the board game Battleship.
What I really like about it is they don't adhere to a very demanding strict order from scene to scene. Some scenes, the loser has to masturbate in front of the other or others. Sometimes that leads to more, sometimes everyone masturbates, you don't get the feeling you've seen every scene after watching one. I think that might be the most important trait for a site like this. The game part can become slow and dragging at times. One scene, the device they were using seemed to stop working and they had to improvise. Knowing that you might see something different as the game progresses keeps me watching. I enjoy the ones where it's a believably innocent young woman and she looks so embarrassed to drop her bra. You will even see blushes. There's no pressure from a demanding producer. It comes off as that rare organic porn.
The masturbation, sex, group or solo or couple is good. I wonder how well some of these models know each other. They at times seem very comfortable with each other and at other times they look like they can't believe they got themselves "into this mess". There aren't many of these types of sites with 100% amateurs and that helps the score too. Many amateur sites have an amateur female and pro or seasoned male. Here you get all amateurs and part of the enjoyment is watching how quickly they (men and women) get aroused. I like this site a lot as my score shows, but I could see it being frustrating for others that are impatient. I like to try and "play along" with the pace of the scene and find this a very stimulating erotic experience if you do it that way. |
|
11-25-19 09:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
92
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Being helpful is one thing. You started it with a correction of something I can reword to say "content that dates back 19 years". That would have been helpful to suggest. Instead, you stick to the technicality that the site itself is only 2 years old. Do you think to a person considering the site they care more about some of the content being 19 years old or the site only being 2?
You then replied with a LOL like a 12 year old. That's really helpful and not mocking is it? I'll edit it and reword it to say the content on the site is as old as 19 years. And there is an elitism here. See pointing out a technicality that has nothing to do with the actual content. That's a need for correcting people.
|
12-09-19 06:39am
|
Reply
93
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I see it that some of the content in the member's area is 19 years old. That makes the site 19 years old to me. The snobbery and elitism here is disgusting.
|
12-09-19 05:27am
|
Review
94
|
Love Hairy
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with 469 "hairy" models
More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos.
1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable.
Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails".
The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those. |
| Cons: |
The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn.
While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months.
Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes.
I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways.
I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years?
The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas.
The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site. |
|
12-08-19 08:47pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
95
|
Low Art Films
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A studio that I remember joining the site of in 2011. It’s worth looking into.
A mostly lesbian site with some of the biggest names in scenes that most people don’t even know exist.
Good download options considering all of this was released in 2010-2012. All of the scenes have 160p up to 720p.
Getting the chance to see some models before their fame or rise. London Keyes stands out most. Her lesbian scene with Nika Noir is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen.
There are some male/female scenes.
What you’re looking at most is this was the first steps to porn like we see on Pure Taboo, the lighting, the colors, they are changing moods with the colors. They need a Porn History class in college. If Art History qualifies as college credit, why not porn history? |
| Cons: |
It's a small site and it’s not going to update ever again. It only has 82 scenes, but I admit, I have downloaded 62 of them.
I wonder if other sites have ever looked into this style of filming. This site could even be confusing for people. Heavy on the glam, but there’s some BDSM in it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn’t list is a pro or con. This site, from what I remember, was going to feature mostly Asian women. It was going to be “interracial” with one of the women (lesbian scenes) being Asian. Times have changed, I don’t really know why this site stopped. Some of the names of models: Charmane Star, Yuri Luv, Sea J. Raw, Puma Swede who is one of the most attractive, athletically built models. Jayden James who I know was on top of the porn world at one time. Capri Anderson. Shyla Jennings. Capri Cavanni. London Keyes. There is even a male/female scene between Asa Akira and Mr. Marcus. Faye Reagan. Reagan Reese. The scene I remember the most is Alexis Amore and Nikki Rhodes with Mexican-inspired Día de los Muertos makeup. This was one of the sites that someone had a vision about. Maybe it didn’t catch on with the consumer. There is almost nothing to fault in these scenes. I do believe Fame Digital maybe bought it out.
The models are top of the shelf for that time period. The only real facts you need is there are 82 of these scenes that someone gave up on way too soon. I wouldn’t be surprised to know the scenes were busting the budget. The whole idea with these scenes goes into the lighting, the colors, it creates a mood in the viewer. They were already trying too hard at that point. This makes me think of what Bree Mills was producing 12 years ago. It blends so many niches.
There are a few solo scenes. Most of the scenes are lesbian. There are some male/female. You’re not expecting to see light water torture of Jayden Jaymes and Nick Manning during a hardcore scene. It’s here, though. There’s a lot of cosplay. There is bondage. And the best part, the lesbian scenes are as close as I think you can get to calling lesbian porn – hardcore. Rough rubbing and fingering. I had a membership recently to Kink and this looks like Kink meets glam. The scenes are very hardcore. I never expect that from a site with Art in the name, but it is Low Art. I believe the name even tells they were trying too hard. There’s a lot of use of oils on the bodies. The rooms they are in look like a mixture of a Soho Penthouse, a gothic dungeon, a million dollar mansion, a Japanese home and a rundown, dilapidated industrial building. I do think a site like this probably inspired some sites that we rate very highly these days. They were doing the creativity. There’s not a lot of stories in the scenes. Adding the quality of the models makes this a site someone like me will download 62 of 82 videos from. Even though I like solo porn. I don’t really like the solo scenes on this site. There’s clearly something going on in these scenes. The solo women should have been in the scenes with couples having sex and masturbating there.
The download quality is not bad. You can download up to 720p on all the scenes. I'm trying to recollect more about this site from my memory. The first 6 scenes have a title. The rest do not. Those were titled, “Janine and Jessica Dirty Desires”. That is Jessica Jaymes and Janine Lindemulder. It does look like the site was first focusing on them. It then shifted to more Asian models. There is even a very spirited solo scene of Sasha Grey in the old, industrial building setting. I consider this one of my best finds. It is also on Adult Time. That may be the advantage to joining Adult Time for a long period of time. I have had time to go through it more.
The last scene they made was one that worked the lights and colors, I thought, the best they had done. Maybe they didn’t get a big response to it and thought that’s the best they had and gave up. It’s Charmane Star and Yuri Luv. The lighting is soft, one background panel is a bright orange, heavy contrast there. Charmane and Yuri have a lot of face make-up on especially around the eyes. Charmane’s is a brighter red. Yuri’s is a muted blue. Someone was really trying to show the contrast. Very happy to have found this site. |
|
02-09-22 06:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
Manko 88
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Uncensored Asian/Japanese porn that is quite good.
Small site with only 30 scenes, but it does get two updates per month.
Some of the scenes are really outstanding including in length and depth of the scene (see cons).
Video quality is excellent with up to 1080p on all videos, all are downloadable.
Downloadable zipped photos that are of high quality 2700x4000
Some threesomes and outdoor scenes too. |
| Cons: |
The scenes greatly vary in length and how interesting the scene is. The longest scene is 67 minutes and five are over 60 minutes, but there are others in the 15 minute range. The depth of the scenes (kinkiness and actions) varies because of this.
One of the first times I’ve watched Asian/Japanese porn and have to say this needs subtitles. One of the scenes is called, “Mother-in-law hungry for cock”. There is so much dialogue going on in the scene, but I have no idea what is being said. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is worth a look for those interested in Japanese porn without the censoring. All of the males in these scenes are not Japanese. I have an interest in Japanese porn from reading reviews about how creative it is and how much of it relies on a story. That clearly is happening in some of these scenes, but without even a basic knowledge of Japanese, I have to just go by the context of actions. I do believe this is going to sticking point for me with this site. While each scene is titled and tells me what the scene is about, there’s not even a synopsis. All of the scenes have the same synopsis that tells you what to expect from Manko88, not the scene itself.
There are only 30 scenes, but there are 2 updates per month and each update comes with a video and photos. The videos and photos are downloadable and from what I can tell it is unlimited. Something that has held back my interest in Japanese and Asian porn is the use of creampies. Based on the very good user features, the niches dropdown box says 23 of these 30 scenes have creampies. I am sure creampies are common in real sex – Covid has me in a drought, but I don’t get the use of creampies in porn. This is performance sex not husband and wife trying to make a baby sex. Cumshots are and always have been one of my favorite parts of porn.
The video quality is good enough though I don’t see any with 4K. They do offer 540p, 720p and 1080p. Which is good enough for me, but maybe not for those wanting 4K. The pictures are 2700x4000, I am not technological enough to know if that is telling me they have the cameras to make 4K videos, but that’s not a dealbreaker for me.
Some of the scenes, like the mother-in-law hungry for cock have what looks to be a sexy story. The son-in-law has the mother-in-law’s panties and is sniffing them. The mother-in-law sees him from a short distance, but out of his sight and starts masturbating watching him sniff her panties. I don’t need the talking to get that part. It then turns to dialogue and turns into sex. There’s so much being said that would either add or take away from this scene, but it’s gibberish to me. I do like the site and the longer scenes. There seems to be quite a lot of taboo going on in these scenes. I would even say a few are more extreme like a black man helping his Asian male friend get his girlfriend off with an array of Magic Wands, threesome sex and what I wouldn’t expect from a Japanese site.
There are cutesy scenes with the pretty Asian models wearing cat or bunny ears (I’m from Chicago, I don’t know animal ears). There are scenes with the female models nude in public. One of the female model having a guy use a dildo on her in the car while driving around which leads to a blowjob and cum in the mouth. There’s a lot going on here that I like, but I really get the feeling this could be even better if I had the slightest clue what they’re talking about. I like the site overall, there’s good video and photo quality and no censoring. I did try a Japanese site with censoring a few months ago and couldn’t even review it. I’m not porn-adapted enough to get around the censor mosaic. This site fixes that problem. It is worth keeping an eye on. If there was more balance from scene to scene, at the very least a synopsis explaining everything or subtitles, this site would score really high for me. It still is considering I have no idea what’s going on besides the sex. |
|
10-19-21 01:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
97
|
Mano Job
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the more impressive niche (handjob, semi-blow, tease, cumshot) sites I have been on.
A lot of content, close to 900 videos, each with a photoset too.
They stray away from the handjob action in believable progression (little oral, grinding ass on, between the boobs).
Great customer service. I made a mistake on my signup and they had it fixed in less than 30 minutes.
Includes access to 2 other sites (Mr. POV, The Dick Suckers) and has 20 scenes from Amateur Allure as a bonus.
Simple to use site.
Females are mostly young, but there are chubbier models, slimmer models and various races. |
| Cons: |
The other reviews I've read said they are recycling content. I didn't know what that meant. I'm not for sure they are. One of the newest scenes is of Allie Addison. I saw her on ALS Scan and they were saying it's her first year in porn. Some might be recycled or they may have removed some, but for this niche this is a lot of content.
I was frustrated with Rocketgate which caused the problem I had to contact the site's customer service about. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is your standard handjob site, but there is a lot more going on here. Some of the models get on top of the guy and tease their vagina against the male's penis. Some slide the guy's penis up and down between their butt cheeks. Others stick the penis between their boobs and some turn into oral and oral teasing.
The more advanced scenes seem to be over the last 3-4 years. Maybe people/fans complained that the handjob action was getting repetitive. The different types of scenes really makes this site excellent.
The models are all in the better looking to very pretty group. That is not common in this niche.
The sites that come with blend in too. Mr. POV is POV sex, if you get tired of watching handjobs you can watch sex from the perspective of the camera. The other is The Dick Suckers. It's a lot like Mano Job except you're going to see oral in every scene. The sites combined have around 1,400 scenes total.
I like it a lot. There is a good amount of focus on the man and his enjoyment. The models all look to be having fun and the scenes with more than just a handjob are better than hardcore sex scenes for me.
The download options are unique. You can download on 1080p, 720p, Web Version, Mobile Version, Cumshot only or Exclusive Interview. You can also stream another option -- the slo-mo cumshot. You can make a playlist with your favorite scenes in it so they play in a row. You can favorite your favorite models.
The site is simple to use. It has a dropdown box to change the site you are viewing. The model index can be viewed in alphabetical order and when you click on a model it shows you all of her scenes on each of their sites.
The models are usually in skimpy clothing, but some wear regular looking outfits, some are topless in the scenes, some are fully nude, it kind of is the pattern on this site. They are covering a lot of bases.
They do tag most of their scenes as J.O.E. sometimes tagged on other sites as J.O.I. J.O.E is jerk off encouragement. I haven't seen any scenes with insults from the women. That is a plus for me. I like to see both people enjoying themselves not one belittling the other.
This will go into my very short list of favorite sites. |
|
08-19-19 10:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
Marcus Mojo
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Advertised as the Next Door Male, quite handsome, athletic and clean-cut.
There are 127 scenes with most (100+) involving more than one guy.
I admit I prefer solo scenes, but these are some of the best gay sex scenes I have watched. There’s at least some theme to the scenes which I have noticed is rare in gay porn.
Navigation is good, the tags are useful, but I still question why a gay site needs a “gay porn” tag.
The pictures are good. This is one of the first gay sites I have seen with downloadable pictures that focus on the guy’s body.
The videos are downloadable with 75% having up to 1080p. The early 25% have up to 540p downloads. |
| Cons: |
Group sex in porn, whether males or males and females, rarely works because there are not enough cameras, or I don’t have enough eyes. The group sex scenes on this site have that problem.
No longer updating (has gay porn died?)
Not as much story as there should be. The story is playing out, but they could easily make these scenes more interesting with more dialogue. |
| Bottom Line: |
To start with, Marcus Mojo fits the “next door” image. He’s clean-cut, more of what I would call cute and unlike most porn models, he’s not even that greatly endowed. Someone would probably disagree with that, but it’s why I like the pictures. You can tell more about what you’re looking at when it’s not moving. He looks to be 5.5 to 6.5 inches. I even like the themes of the scenes and it’s why I am not being as focused on just solo scenes. There are only 18 solo scenes on the site. The themes mostly are in the athletic, sports theme, including jockstraps, two athletic guys in a gym changing room. Am I the only female that thinks about guys doing things with each other in the changing room? It couldn’t just be a female thing.
I do want to mention the pictures a little more. I hope that gay sites take note of this. A guy having sex on video is no different if it’s a male or female that he’s having sex with. Things are still flopping around; things are disappearing in holes and there’s not enough focus on the “things”. The pictures allow the things to hold still long enough to be admired. There are also 60-100 photos in these zip downloads.
The videos are downloadable with the majority having two small/mobile resolutions, the 480p and 540p resolutions, plus the HD 720p and 1080p resolutions. The videos are not long enough with most being under 20 minutes, but I attribute that to the basic themes/stories the scenes have. There seems to be a stressing of “we are rushing so not to get caught” to the scenes. Like they’re really not gay and are just having a fun time with each other before leaving the gym.
A compliment I won’t say a lot just because it’s a little lewder than I would go into, the cumshots are one of the most impressive parts and that’s a positive and negative. I find myself fast-forwarding to those. That could be my preference for solo males showing. The cumshot is one of, maybe the most important parts of the solo scene.
A site like this, I try to be fair and give a straight female perspective on what is marketed towards gay men, can be good for a straight female. There is enough variety in the setup of the scenes to give you the feeling of it’s not repetitive. There are threesomes (all guys), there are solo, there are one on one and there a few more than three guys scenes that have just too much going on to keep up with.
This would, I think, appeal to both gay men and straight women. There aren’t a lot of twinks in these scenes. The tags only list two scenes with twinks. These are more athletic, masculine men than most gay sites have on them. |
|
12-03-21 08:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
99
|
Mature.nl
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Expansive site that features mature women and their sexual playmates.
One of the biggest sites I know of.
Not only is it updating, but even updates multiple times on some days.
As broad of a selection of niches as I have seen.
Downloadable videos and pictures.
There is high effort in every possible way. |
| Cons: |
The price might put some off, but shouldn't.
Older video quality isn't as good. |
| Bottom Line: |
I consider myself a fan of older/younger porn and this site is one of the best at that niche. I like that it's not just older women doing all the seducing. You will also see younger women with older men. Though I can't say whether the younger woman or older man is responsible for the seduction.
This site excels in ways I believe are overlooked in porn nowadays. The vague pro of there is high effort in every possible way is about that. The production is excellent, there's enough story and explanation to make you feel like every scene isn't the same. There are details including the settings and even outfits. I would go as far as saying in a good way, it's artistic. Sure, if you just want the nudity and sex action, that's here but if you want more, you will get it from these scenes.
The sexual action is very good as well. The ages of the participants really are only numbers. You will notice the experience showing and it makes for some of the most interesting and involving porn I have watched. That's my way of saying, we all could probably learn a new trick or two from the videos.
The site has nearly 9,000 videos and they update as much as any site I have been a member of. The broad amount of niches adds a lot of value too. Personally, I like the seduction scenes the most, especially when it's an older woman seducing a younger woman. That's not a niche we see a lot of, though there are a few sites that do it. I don't think any do it as well as this site.
The navigation is good, but I believe the nature of the site makes it a little more difficult to navigate. I have never been good at keeping up with models and this site is so large, it's not any easier to know which to watch. It does make this site hard for a one month membership. You're going to need some time just to find what you're most interested in and even then, you'll likely find yourself distracted.
There is the con of the older video quality not being as good as the newer, but I think that's to be expected and is understood. The majority of the videos are available in full HD 1080p.and look great. The price is a bit steep, but if you're like me, you don't find a lot of sites you're that interested in. This one keeps my interest and I see no reason to think that's going to change.
With the size of the site being larger than some entire networks and updates coming consistently, I see it as a good value. It helps that the content is high quality and it too, is consistently good. There's hardly ever a wasted update. I would even say they have scenes that surprise me with the different twists and turns the stories take. I consider this one of the better sites I've joined and it reminds me of why I first became interested in pay porn sites. |
|
11-11-24 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
Men Over 30
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very large gay site that has some very large men on it.
The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos.
Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men.
I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005.
Newer scenes have up to 4K |
| Cons: |
As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged.
Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it.
Oldest scenes are only 480p. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women.
The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good.
The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them!
This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating. |
|
12-08-21 03:57am
Replies (0)
|
|
