Impressive review.
It's nice to see a person's real thoughts instead of a review that follows a formula ticking off the points to be followed in a review.
And in this case, not a lot of points need to be followed.
The Mormon Girlz site membership is a waste of money, due to lack of content.
It's a mystery why they messed up a good site by dumping their content.
Maybe it's related to the sale of the site to Team Skeet?
They might be holding onto the deleted videos/photosets and trying to sell them elsewhere?
Whatever.
The site as it exists is a grab for money.
Thanks for the review, which is a fine warning to anyone who reads it.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
Riding her therapist's dick with her full tits bouncing gets Britney moaning and gasping with delight, but she's not fully satisfied quite yet. That pinnacle of delight doesn't come until Britney is bent over her chair getting her fuck hole pounded from behind while she dreams of her stepdad. After briefly sucking her therapist's dick one last time, Britney lets him fuck her until he cums all over her belly just like she wishes her stepdaddy would do."
The model/actor playing the therapist is a poor actor. No one bothered to write a script for him to act. You can tell he's just making up words to tell Brittany Light. I've met salesmen who could lie and throw the bull shit convincingly, but this guy is not smooth or convincing.
Britney Light is much more convincing as a pretty young teen with the problem that she is attracted to her stepfather. And she is so cute, with such a soft sweet voice, all you want to do is comfort with a gentle fuck and maybe a harder fuck if she starts to moan and groan a lot.
You can tell I am enjoying this site far more than the That Sitcom Show site, which is the other bonus site you get when joining Nubiles Film.
For one thing, these models are more attractive.
For another, the plots are less intrusive.
You can focus on what you'd like to do to these girls easier.
I had no connection with That Sitcom Show site. I didn't think it was erotic. I didn't enjoy the parodies.
But looking at the models at Hot Crazy Mess, I felt like a dirty old man again. Better yet, a dirty young man. The teen models are so cute,
your mind feels like it's 18 years old again. With all the urges.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
Cons:
-Archive site. Last video posted 2020-01-03. That is the main con, they won't be updating this site.
The site score of 88 is because I really like the videos at this site. The girls are attractive, they seem like sweet young women, not porn sluts. Maybe that's narrow-minded of me. I don't hold being in porn against the models, but I like and am more comfortable with the idea or fantasy of a sweet young thing having sex, instead of a porn slut having sex.
And these girls are really attractive. I mean fucking attractive. Physically. And mentally (the image of a sweet young thing, instead of a porn star slut).
And the plot, although it's meant to act as the setup for the sex, does not get in the way too much: you can focus on the attractive girl, and the sex that is going to happen.
And the female models do a good job acting their roles. Better than the stunt cocks, who seem like lame actors in comparison to how well the female models act.
Or maybe I'm looking at the female models and thinking what I'd like to do to them, and that increases their acting ability, because their actions are less jarring than the stunt cock actions and voices.
The female models project the image of sweet young things.
They could have hired better stunt cocks, who had better acting ability.
But the focus is on the models instead of the stunt cocks.
Which is as it should be.
I really enjoy this site. Think it makes a nice addition to the Nubile Films site as a bonus.
Compared to ThatSitComShow site, which is boring bonus.
Description of a sample video:
"Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1"
"Britney Light is seeing a therapist for her deviant thoughts regarding her stepdad. She selected this therapist because his methods are unconventional, but they work. The therapist starts by having Britney close her eyes to visualize the most sexually exciting scenario with her stepdad that she can and then describe it. Then he tells her to take off her panties and imagine the scenario playing out as she masturbates. While the therapist describes the salacious situation, he can't help but whip out his stiffie and start stroking it because he finds Britney and her fantasies so hot.
The next step in Britney's therapy is to substitute her therapist for her stepdad. He lets her know that his cock is now her stepdad's cock so she can use it to play out her fantasies. Although Britney is a little hesitant at first, she agrees to start sucking. Soon she's lost in her own desire as she gobbles that cock and then climbs on top to take it all the way into her dripping pussy.
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank Wraith0711 for posting a comment that Nubile Films now includes 2 bonus sites:
That Sitcom Show and Hot Crazy Mess.
He's one of those detailed-people who examine a site to see what it has to offer.
I wasn't aware that the bonus sites were added, until he posted the comment.
-I should also thank exotics4me for pointing out that the 2 bonus sites added to Nubile Films were probably added around 2-3 months ago.
-PU discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $29.98/month.
But there is a yearly price of $99.95.
However, if you join through Nubile Films, they have a current discount of $84/year. Nubile Films also has a current discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $19.94/month.
So join through Nubile Films, and save a few dollars, if you're going to be around for more than 1 month.
-Login and member pages are https.
-The models are mainly slender white teens, with some black and latina models. There is even at least one Asian model (Lulu Chu).
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They don't list the nationality of the models. The models are mainly cute to very attractive. A lot of young honey bunnies that are fucking hot.
-These girls are cute to really cute. Lily Rader, Audrey Grace, Alex Blake, Piper June, Riley Star, Britney Light, Dolly Leigh are just a few of the young teens that grace these videos.
-Videos have a plot to set up the sex. But not a lot of thought is really put into the plot. It's really thin. And the models are not really actors. Except some of the models are so cute it doesn't matter: either they are better actors than I thought, or they are so attractive you're looking at their face and body so hard you're not paying much attention to what they're saying.
-The screenshots download in a zip.
-There is a good description of the plot/action for each video.
-You can tag videos with a favorite label, and save them in a favorites group.
-A lot of the models are petite, around 5' or so. That just adds to their cuteness.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. 67 videos total. Plus matching photosets for each video.
-Last update was 2020-01-03.
That's a shame, because some of these girls are really cute, and I would love to see even more cute girls added. That's probably the biggest con of the site, no more updates.
-The camera is poor POV. The guy holding the camera does not hold it steady, it can move around, which is distracting and irritating.
They should have hired a professional shoot the video. It would have made a nice improvement.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Very little model information. Age, height, country. figure measurements, that's it.
-The video plot descriptions are very detailed, which is good. But reading the descriptions, you start to see the same plot points being repeated. They run out of fresh ideas, and just use the same stories. But since the girls are so cute, you can more or less ignore the plots, and feast on the girls, who can be sweet and sexy and hot as hell.
-Sometimes when they shoot outdoors, the random noise level can be quite high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
-Last video posted 2020-01-03.
-67 videos.
-67 matching photosets.
-Video runtime 20 to 30 minutes.
-Videos can be downloaded in definitions from 270 through 1080p.
-Photosets run around 35 photos per set.
-Each photo is 1920x1080px.
They indicate the photos are screen shots, but they are good quality. I assume there is some excellent software that converts a video into a photoset, because the quality of each screenshot is far superior to what the screenshots were from 10 or 15 years ago.
I examine the photos in a photoset, and I couldn't tell they were screenshots. Most of the photos were very nice. I wish a some of the photos per set were slightly more focused, better definition, because some of these girls are really cute, but many of the screenshots look like real photos. And the screenshots are focused on the action, centered, not just random screenshots that have heads or parts of the body randomly cut off out of the photo.
The photosets are worth keeping.
Maybe I'm just tired at looking at the MetArt and other high quality glamour site photosets, but I am getting slightly bored with many of their recent models. Perhaps it's just me. But the girls at this Hot Crazy Mess site were much more appealing, that I even liked their photosets more than what I like at MetArt. Two different types of content: MetArt is mainly young women, late teens or twenties. Strictly softcore. Glamour-style photos. The girls at Hot Crazy Mess at mainly cute teens doing hardcore sex.
The Hot Crazy Mess models are more desirable than the models at MetArt because they generate more heat.
Britney Light, in the video, "Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1", is a cute young teen. 19 years old. Extremely cute. Soft, tender voice. She's so fuckable. Not an elegant way of putting it, but it's the God damn truth. At least in this video, she is hot and wet and luscious. Not like a porn star, but like a sweet young thing you'd like to pound on for a few hours. If you had the strength and endurance.
Porn is fantasy, but that's what this model makes me think. And quite a few other models at this site.
Whereas, many of the models at MetArt, although absolutely gorgeous, have lately left me cold. Maybe I need to take a break from porn, but the girls at Hot Crazy Mess are really attractive, which I appreciate. That I can find something to like a lot.
Kyler Quinn, in a video at the site titled: "Fuck Thy Neighbor - S5:E6", comes across as a sweet young teen (her age is listed as 20) who broke up with her boyfriend who was cheating on her. So she meets a new neighbor and has sex with him as a rebound fuck.
I don't know what it is: the vibes from these videos are like these are sweet young things, who are having problems, and they are using sex to help with the pain. They are sweet, innocent, not sluts, not porn stars (fantasy, again, remember), who just want to share a moment in time with another human being.
I just enjoy the videos a lot. It's a different vibe, a different atmosphere from glamour or heartcore or gonzo, but a reality-based slice of life where the sweet young thing has a problem, and she is having sex to reduce her pain.
I don't know why, but the videos just appeal to me.
(The models are attractive young women, and the videos are well shot--apart from the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.)
Ella Cruz is another adorable teen model.
I mean, this site has a bunch of lovely teen models, that are just fascinating to watch.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
Pros:
-Fine looking, attractive young models. Could be girl next door types, except they are attractive to very attractive. Not porn sluts.
-Excellent video quality, except for the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.
-Nice sets. But when they shoot outdoors, the noise level can be quite high.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY:
I remember visiting the Netherlands and Denmark in the early 1990s.
As a tourist, we were charged higher prices than what our tour guides were paying, for the items. I thought it was a rip-off, but we were on a tour, and that's the way it worked.
Unfair, but when we were in a group at some stops, that's what happened.
But I've read in the past, that PU members in Europe often have to pay higher prices, because of regional pricing. Which could be because of the credit card company, or the pay site processor, or some other reason.
But if there is some legal way to get around it, it would be helpful to know, for our European members. To get better prices.
I thought That Sitcom Show site was a waste of time, because the videos were so boring.
But I also thought the videos were well made (good acting, strong plots, good production values).
So maybe someone might enjoy the videos.
If you are still a member of Nubile Films, I strongly recommend you should check out the Hot Crazy Mess site.
For one, the models are much more attractive.
For another, there is some variation in the models: although mainly slender white teens, there are some black and latina models that you might like.
And, for me at least, I found a bunch of really cute girls, and the videos were much hotter.
I didn't like the POV camera-work very much. They needed a professional on the camera, that would have been less jerky in the filming.
But cute girls plus some hot sex make for a fine site.
Like I say, if you are still have access, check the site out.
It might make up for the disappointing parody site.
Also, you were disappointed with joining the Nubile Films site.
But the site itself is well worth joining, with a lot of excellent content (videos and photosets). I think it's one of the better hardcore teen sites on the internet. There are many fine hardcore teen sites available. Which is a good thing, in my opinion.
An embarrassment of riches.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank PU member Wraith0711 for pointing out in a comment ThatSitComShow and HotCrazyMess are included as bonus sites in a membership with NubilesFilm.
The NubilesFilm site itself doesn't seem to advertise you get the bonus sites, so unless you are sharp-eyed or detail oriented like Wraith0711, you don't see all the content available to you with a membership.
-I joined Nubiles Films in September 2019 for a year-long membership. That's why I am saying I'm been a member of That Sitcom Show for 6-12 months. I'm not sure when they added That Sit Com Show as a bonus site.
-ThatSitcomShow (and Nubiles Films) is currently running a special discount of $84/year.
-You get a bunch of different content options: Video (streaming and downloading), Pics, Screenshots.
-Downloads are offered in 270p through 1080p.
-Streaming quality is 270p through 720p.
-Content is exclusive.
-Streaming and downloading are unlimited.
-Login and member pages are https.
Cons:
-That Sitcom Show's last update was 2019-09-20. So it's an archive site. And with the coronavirus epidemic, it will probably stay an archive site, as the virus shuts down porn production around the world for months or more.
-Small site. Only 44 videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The videos are boring. That's my personal reaction. Maybe other people will find them funny and worth watching, or sexy. Time and money and talent was spent making the the videos.
Bottom Line:
That Sitcom Show features the porn parodies of popular TV shows:
Two Men, Big Bang, Friends With Benefits, Threesome Company, Married With Issues, and a bunch of other TV shows are featured.
I don't watch a lot of regular TV, so I'm not familiar with most (or any) of the TV shows that are being parodied. I won't enjoy the parodies as much as someone who is a regular watcher of those shows. I won't catch the jokes as easily, the jokes will have less meaning for me.
I think the Nubile Films site (that is part of the package of Nubiles Film, That SitCom Show and Hot Crazy Mess) is the star of the 3 sites. Nubiles Films is an outstanding hardcore site, with outstanding models that range from attractive to lovely, and high level videos that are gorgeous to watch: well lit, beautifully filmed.
That SitCom Show is less appealing. It's porn parodies, not my favorite niche.
Since I'm unfamiliar with the TV shows being parodied, I can't appreciate the parodies as much as someone who is familiar with the original content of the TV shows.
I think they put a lot of thought and effort into making a quality product of the parodies.
There is a good audience laugh track for the show, the models (male and female) are actually actors, who do a much better job acting than most porn models. There is a real plot involved in the episodes. The female models are attractive.
One problem watching these parodies: my mind knows these are parodies. So I can't watch them as straight porn, I'm trying to find the humor in the video, since that is what a parody is supposed to be: an exaggerated version of something that has a humorous factor. So the humor gets in the way of reacting to a sex scene.
Do you remember the movie, "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"? The classic scene with Phoebe Cates coming out of the swimming pool in a red bikini. Phoebe Cates, lovely face, fantastic body, she unhooks the top of her bikini and shows her breasts. One of the most iconic sex scenes of the early 1980s. Not much sex, just a fantastic looking girl and brief flash of breasts. But that scene had it all. One of the most beautiful girls of all time, topless, humor and wit. Not a parody, but just a great fucking scene in a very good movie.
I can't appreciate the videos in That Sit Com Shows. I know they are good quality videos: the acting is far superior to the acting of most porn models. The video technical quality is good. The script is good.
I think the problem is that I'm want porn to be hot, arousing. And the scenes don't turn me on. The Phoebe Cates scene in Fast Times at Ridgemont High was shocking. I kept thinking what a fucking gorgeous girl Phoebe Cates is. And the humor and wit were just added bonuses. But the parodies at That Sit Com Shows don't excite my admiration or excitement. They are nicely done, far better than what I was expecting.
But so what? They are not what I'm looking for in porn.
I remember going to New York City in the 1970s and watching Candide on Broadway. Candide was based on a novel by Voltaire and was a satire on Leibniz's philosophy of optimism. The play was enjoyable and exciting. Not porn, but interesting.
The porn parodies are not especially interesting.
Not especially fun.
Maybe if I was a fan of the TV series the videos are based on, they might have more interest and be funnier for me.
But even though I think the porn videos are done very well, they are boring for me.
Bottom Line:
Pros:
They've put a lot of time and effort and talent into making good porn parodies of TV shows.
Login and member pages are https.
The models are surprisingly good actors. The scripts are good.
Cons:
The videos are boring for me.
The site is small. 44 videos.
The site's last update was 2019-09-20.
The prices you quote seem very high to me.
They are far higher than what a person in the United States (USA) pays.
Are those the prices you see when you use the PU link to go to the join page at the Vixen site?
If so, can you use a VPN to change the location your computer shows?
Year-long memberships to a VPN can be very cheap.
And with a VPN, you can choose a location in the US, as the computer link location.
And I would assume you would see much lower membership prices.
I would assume, but not really sure, that your credit card company (if that's how you fund your membership) would charge a small premium for converting your payment to US dollars, but it should still be far less than the prices you are quoting in your review.
I'm not a lawyer, so I assume what I'm suggesting is legal.
But you seem to be paying far too much for this membership.
Are there special taxes you pay, in addition to conversion rates, for a membership to pay site, and that's why your fees are so high?
The normal PU discount is:
Monthly: $24.95 the first month (recurring recurs at $29.95/mo.)
Year: $99.95 (recurring)
And there are often holiday specials, when the price can drop to around $10 or $15 for the first month,
I suggest checking out what a good, cheap VPN would cost for a year or multi-year membership.
Most of them give a free trial of a few weeks or more.
VPN means your computer is safer from hacking.
But some services don't allow you to be connected to a VPN while you use them.
For example, Netflix will not allow you to use a VPN to connect to their service.
Just a suggestion.
But the prices you are paying for Vixen (and maybe other porn sites) seem very high. Much higher than what US customers pay.
Thanks for the update.
Whenever you have the time, it's fine to write a review.
Stay healthy.
I've read that experiencing the virus can be a terrible ordeal.
Wishing you well, but try to stay healthy.
Glad you're able to work, because many people have been laid off.
Seems like it's either too much or too little, for those with jobs.
Crazy situation.
An interesting review.
Some nice details and thoughts.
It's also interesting how some sites can seem to suddenly become popular.
There have been 5 reviews of this site in the last 2 months.
Then, in 2019, there were 3 reviews of the site in a 2-month period.
The site doesn't attract me, because of the pay system for cam shows, which I don't usually bother with anyway.
I don't like the site splitting scenes into parts, instead of making a scene available as a single video. Also don't like the delay between Action 1 and Action 2.
But your review is just interesting and readable.
I don't know why.
It just strikes me as one of the best reviews I've read recently.
Good one.
I'm a member of Nubile Films, have too many memberships to visit the sites I'm paying for very often, which is a waste of money.
My eyes are bigger than what I can use.
But thanks for the update.
I had no idea Nubile Films has the bonus sites.
I will definitely check them out.
Nubile Films, by itself, is a fine site, worth joining for itself.
And with the holiday discount (or whatever they call this discount), Nubile Films seems like a real bargain.
Separately, I hope you write a review of the Mormon Girlz site, as a warning to PU members that the site is poor join because of the limited content.
A review is much more visible than a comment on the site.
Girls Under Arrest is listed as a pay site by The Best Porn.
isthisreal is an adult time live series.
The public page (not the member page) of IsThisReal shows:
Adult Time
Live Series
Daily cam shows.
Free for members (of the Adult Time network, I assume).
I'm not very interested in cam shows.
But if you are a member of Adult Time, you can check out what the isthisreal series/channel offers.
The difference between a site, a channel, or a series seems to be blurred.
On a different public page, at least 2 of the Girls Under Arrest, Nocturnal Massage, Sister's Sex Tape, and some other series (or channels) are listed under the IsThisReal public page, so I assume all those series are part of the IsThisReal channel, as well as being part of the Adult Time network.
If you are a member of Adult Time, you can check out one or more of those series/channels/sites/whatEverYouCallThem yourself.
Because of the poor lighting, the skin tones of the models are poor: they don't look attractive or life-like.
If they deleted the channel, I think the value of network would improve, because I don't think the videos add any value to the network.
But if you're in the mood to watch some POV videos of fake cops abusing girls with blow jobs and hard fucking, you can fill that urge at this channel.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
When a cop finds a teen girl who is good-looking, and she appears to have done something wrong, the cop reveals his human side: a blowjob and a fuck will usually get the girl off with a warning.
The site does not publish how many cops have sex with possible teen criminals.
This is supposed to be reality porn.
The site was started 2018.
The site has 11 videos.
The last video update was 2019-03-28.
So it's an archive site.
It should be easy examing 11 videos to see what the site has to offer:
The models are OK to good: Hannah Hays, Gia Valentina, Honey Gold, Alex Blake, Khloe Kapri, Kendra Spades and Julie Kay are all ready to show you what happens when you resist arrest in front of a big cop with a gun.
Many of the scenes take place at night. The lighting is poor. You can't see clearly what the mdels look like, whiat is happening. The camera work is poor: they are trying to film the video as POV, and the actors and camera are moving, so the camera is not centered on the action very well. Maybe it's supposed to add an element of realism to the scene, but I prefer to see clearly what is happening.
So, I don't like the lighting (too dark), the sound control (they are shooting outdoors, which requires better control over the sound than a studio shoot), poor placement of the camera (they are moving around outdoors, which is harder to film ant an indoor scene).
So the overall quality of the video technique is blow par.
Video runtime averages aroun 30 - 37 minutes.
You can stream videos: 288p through 1080p.
You can download the vidoes 160p through 1080p.
File sized for the different definiton downloads seem a little large: the 37 minute video at 1080p is 3.05 GB.
I'm giving the channel a low score of 59.
The channel is an archive, the channel stopped updating about 1 year after it started.
The main problems: the channel is small, 11 videos.
The quality of the videos is poor: this is because they were trying to make POV videos, at night, where the lighting was dark, the cameras could not be centered on the action because the models were moving around.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN THE NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Girls Under Arrest is a series or channel on the Adult Time network. Membership in the Girls Under Arrest channel gives you access to the rest of the Adult Time network, and vice versa.
-PU has a discounted price for the first month of of $14.05, recurring at $29.95/month.
-Porn sites are constantly looking for a new idea to make thier content seem fresh and appealing.
This site features young girls who have problems with the law.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset that captures the action. There is a zip file for the photoset, and also for the video.
-The channel has all the features of the Adult Time network:
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can stream or download the videos in multiple definitions: from 160p through 1080p.
-Video runtime is from 28 to 44 minutes.
-Videos have a matching photoset that is zipped. Around 35 photos per photoset.
Cons:
-The major con is this is a small site: only 11 videos.
-The site is an archive site. Started 2018-08, last update 2019-04.
-The videos are shot POV style. Which allows for dark scenes, poor lighting, shifty camera angles, poor focus on the models because the models are moving and the camera-operator has to jiggle the cameria to follow the action.
-The photosets have a zip file, but only one definition for the zip file.
-Photosets download with a default generic numbered file name, that should be renamed if you want to know who the models are, what the scene represents.
-But the truth is, these photosets are not worth keeping. Although the video definitions range from 160p through 1080, the value of the videos is poor. Unless you enjoy watching cops abusing young girls into blowjobs and harsh fucking, in dimly lighted videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
I respect the law, and know that law enforcement officers are among the finest, bravest citizens in our great country.
I can re-count some instances of where my family inter-acted with the law and was able to see how wonderful police officers can be.
I live in a condo association. Sometimes the US mailmen make a mistake and delive a piece of mail to wrong mail box.
I brought a piece of mail to my neighbor, and told him it was his mail, delivered to my mail box.
This was a strong, good-looking cop.
He kept his right hand in his pocket the entire time I spoke with him, instead of shaking hands with me. Did he have a small gun in his pocket, in case I was a criminal?
Better safe than sorry.
I'm an older man, now in my 70s, in poor health, so I don't think I'm much of a threat.
But the cop kept his hand in his right pocket the entire time I was at his door.
Also, he asked me where I got his mail.
Implying that maybe I stole it, which would be a federal crime.
My explanation that the mail delivery people sometimes put mail into the wrong box didn't seem to impress him.
And he was right to be suspicous. I could have jimmied his mail box and stolen the letter. Even though I didn't open it, I could have been using the letter as a trick to become friendly with him, as the beginning of a scam.
Cops are taught to be suspicous of people. My action of bringing him a piece of his mail could have been a setup for some crime.
Did he thank me for giving him the mail envelope?
No.
He took it, and shut the door.
No thank you.
Another time, I saw the inside light on his truck parked on his driveway was on, and the truck was empty.
I knocked on his door, told him the inside light on his truck was on.
He went out and turned off the light.
No thank you.
No sense of appreciation.
I guess I was lucky he didn't arrest me for coming onto his property.
Maybe he could have shot me, as a dangerous suspect, if he was having a bad day or wanted to blow off steam.
A different time I was walking for exercise in my neighborhood.
Two cops stopped me, asked what I was doing.
I told them I was walking for exercise. I'm almost 70 at the time, not a big or threatening guy.
They asked me if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no.
Then they asked me if I was off of probation. I said no.
They asked me what my job was, I said I was retired. They asked what my job was before I retired. I gave them my wallet, to show that I lived one street over from the current location. That might have been a mistake, because I didn't ask before I reached for the wallet in my back pocket. They could have shot me for reaching for a weapon.
The asked me a few more questions, and let me go.
This was around 2:30 PM, broad daylight. There was no curfew or law against walking on public sidewalks.
You read in the paper where cops shoot unarmed people, sometimes killing them, because the suspect seems dangerous and the cops need to protect themselves.
This happens a lot, because in United States, cops are rarely punished for killing an unarmed suspect. What is a suspect? A suspect is anyone a cop encounters who is not a cop wearing a cop uniform with a badge and gun.
The motto of the police where I live is "To protect and to serve". But I've never felt served or protected when I meet a cop. A cop is an authority figure, with a gun, and if you don't do exactly what he says, you need to have a lawyer with you, or the cop's right are more powerful than your rights. That's on a practical basis.
Many years ago, back in the 1970s, I was walking down a public street, on my way to a black college library.
A cop pulled his car in front of me, I stopped walking, the cop got out of the car, asked me where I was going, I told him I was going to the library. He told me to lean my hands on the car, and ran his hands over my body. Then he said he hadn't searched me. I didn't say anything. He told me to get into the car, I did, and he drove me to the library. It was a black community college library. I'm white. He talked to someone, and told me I could never go back to the library again.
The public library was a few miles away. The black college library was within a few blocks from where I lived. But I never went back to the black college library.
What could I do? Hire a lawyer, which costs money, so I can go the library that is closest to me?
I had very little money. A cop tells you something, you do it.
It's not worth being arrested for going to a black college library.
I have no criminal record. Except for some traffic tickets. But if a cop tells you to do something, the smart thing to do is to say "Yes, sir" and do it. Anything else can you can get into trouble.
Anyway, this site doesn't get into the real nitty gritty of dealing with cops.
This site features actors playing good ol' boy cops who are looking for kicks and maybe a little sex on the side.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY:
Wraith0711, it would be nice if you posted a review of the Mormon Girlz site.
Just to give PU readers a warning on the site.
rearadmiral did an excellent review on the Mormon Girlz in 2016.
It covered his thoughts and reactions to the site.
He thought it was a good site, giving it a score of 87.
FreeMac did a review of the Mormon Girlz site a year later, and was seriously disappointed.
He gave the site a score of 60.
He wrote that the site had eliminated almost half their content, and that this destroyed most of the value of a site membership.
The Best Porn (the sister site of Porn Users) released a review of Mormon Girlz in 2017-09-01, around the same time as the FreeMac review. They gave the site a score of 76, which seems very generous, considering the limited content of the site, and the slow update rate.
A quote from The Best Porn review in 2017:
"Strangely, MormonGirlz has eliminated almost half of their videos, which I don't quite understand. There used to be nearly 150 scenes."
So if the site dropped half of their content, and the site is still small, that would obviously hurt the value of the site.
The site used to be (before they dropped half of their content) an interesting niche.
They did a fine job of making videos showing the inner workings of the Mormon church (fantasy videos, not real).
On a practical basis, I mainly join sites that offer a network.
Limited funds, so I want access to a bunch of content.
Obviously, not all sites have the same value: But the content of a single site, especially when it's a premium site, has to be really special for me to join.
Sites like MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios etc. are excellent sites with outstanding content that I have joined over the years.
I even have a lifetime membership in MetArt and a few of the other MetArt network sites. That I regret paying for, because I am losing my appreciation of those sites lately. But that's just me.
But again, your review of Mormon Girlz would serve as a warning for PU readers to avoid the site as a waste of money.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-Site is part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Navigation is easy. You can switch between sites in the network, without having to re-login with username and password.
-There is a good models listing, that has a nice thumbnail of each model, with hot links to her content at the entire network, not just to the Beauty Angels site.
However: the model listing at each site only includes the models at that site, and not the entire network. If you want a model listing of the entire network, you have to switch to the Teen Mega World site, which does have a model listing that includes all the network models.
-The site updates with 1 video and photoset per week. Which is an amazing update rate, since the other 5 video/photoset updates are scattered over the rest of the network each week.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site (and network) features Eastern European models: almost all white, mainly slender, ranging from attractive to lovely, even though not a lot of effort is put into making the girls glamourous: the models are just fresh, young, naturally attractive teens. That is one of the strengths of the site and network: how attractive these teens are.
-The girls are naturally attractive. Almost no fake boobs.
You can find a lot of these models at the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites. The Wow Girls/Wow Porn models are among the cutest, most attractive teen models on the internet, which is one of the strengths of those sites. The Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites put a little more effort into making their models appear attractive: I wouldn't call the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites glamour sites, because I think a glamour site requires a glamour approach or maybe a heartcore approach with a little romance, and the Wow sites are straight sex with little romance or glamour.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-No download limits. No streaming limits.
-Videos for the last few years can be streamed from 360p through 2160p.
-Videos for the last few years can be downloaded from 360p through 2160p.
They started offering 2160p videos around June 2016.
They started offering 1060p videos around May 2014.
The site started around 2011, when they were offering 360 -720p, I believe.
This makes a difference if you insist on higher quality definition to watch a video.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are minor. This is one of my favorite hardcore teen sites, and I've been a continuous member for several years.
-They advertise a discount for the first month of $7.49, which is called an "Easter Discount".
Edit: this is misleading. The $7.49 for the first month, is for a year-long membership, which costs
$89.95 for a year, recurring. I think this is a trick that porn companies often do, quoting a 1-month membership for a low price, and you don't find it's for a year-long membership until you click on the join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. So could be hacked. And your ISP keeps a record of each page you visit.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many memberships with Vendo to different sites over the years, and never had a problem.
-The search function is poor. The search at Beauty Angels only returns content from the Beauty Angels site. If you do a search for a specific model, only her content at the Beauty Angels site is returned, and nothing from other sites in the Teen Mega World network.
However, on the last update to the network, they messed up the search at the Teen Mega World site. If you joined through the Teen Mega World network itself, and do a search for a model by name, you are returned a jumbled mess of names that is useless.
If you want to search for a model's content at the network, you need to join through the Teen Mega World site itself, and not through one of the satellite sites. And then, you need to bring up the model listing, click on the model's name in the listing (not from the search box), and then you can find the model's content at the network.
-Models are white Eastern European teens. If you want other races or ethnicities, or age groups, you won't find it here.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: The models are girls from 18 through early 20s. The girls are either showing off their fresh young bodies, or masturbating.
There is also girl/girl lesbian sex.
Boys are a rarity, mainly appearing in the early years of the site.
For many years now, it's only solo girl or girl/girl sex.
The site has 495 videos, plus matching photosets.
The main strength of the site (and network) are the attractive teen models.
Personally, I think the yearly price of $89.95 is a bargain, but if you search, you can sometimes find a yearly membership even cheaper.
You get 33 teen sites with a membership to any one of the Teen Mega World sites.
That covers a wide variety of niches.
Many of the sites have not updated in years.
But Beauty Angels updates with a new video and photoset each week.
They advertise daily updates for the network. But if you check the update dates, there are 6 new videos and photosets each week.
That is still a large amount of porn each week, with a huge amount of hardcore teen content from the network.
A second strength of the site (and network) is the simplicity of the videos. There's very little acting, which is a good thing, because most porn models are lousy actresses. You have a girl, she strips, then masturbates. Or you have two girls, who kiss, fondle each other, and start solo masturbation or masturbating each other, or have lesbian sex. Very little dialogue (which is in Russian, probably, and you don't need subtitles because who cares what they are saying, it's the sex and naked bodies that matter). And if you really care about the dialogue, they sometimes have subtitles in English.
All in all: mainly attractive teens, with some real beauties, and they put on a show worth watching.
I'm giving the site a score of 92, because the site is good, and it comes with network access.
Responding to the coronavirus pandemic, Adult Time has started a new series about doing Yoga.
You can watch and do this series at home.
In a safe and healthy manner.
Perhaps it will even relieve stress.
Only 1 episode so far, and if the virus evaporates like dear Donald Trump predicted by April, maybe we won't need further episodes after all.
Adult Time seems to start new series, and run out of steam quickly, at times. Or maybe they have too many channels to watch, and not enough talent to keep building them up.
But I still think Adult Time has some great content.
The Pure Taboo is my favorite channel here.
A movie-like experience for watching twisted porn.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
The Relaxxxed channel tries to make their videos individualized, and it doesn't work that well. Keep it simple works better.
BOTTOM LINE SUMMARY:
Pros:
Relaxxxed is part of the Lets Doe It network, with 130 videos.
Cons:
Archive site, last update was almost 2 years ago.
I didn't find any videos at the channel that I really liked.
The models at the site are just OK, not very attractive.
I'd give the channel a score of 72, because it needs to improve to be a worthwhile channel.
Actually, there are far better channels at the network, and since this is an archive, if they eliminated the channel, the network would be improved.
Normally, you think that more content improves the value of a network.
But if a channel falls below the quality of the network, eliminating the channel improves the
value of the network. Why have trash cluttering up some really good channels?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Lets Doe It network, a mainly European glamcore network. The White Boxxx channel is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet, because of the care and techniques they use to make the attractive models as lovely as possible.
-You get access to all the channels (15 channels total) with a membership in any one of the channels, or with a membership to the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Relaxxxed channel has 130 videos. So it's one of the larger channels in the network.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Archive channel. Last update was 2018-07-10.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The first page you see when you login is a page of ads. This is a con and also a pro. Con, because who wants to see more ads, you paid for your membership, give me what I paid for, don't shove ads at me. Pro, because some of the ads have very low prices for some fine sites (as well as sites I have no interest in). So if I had lots of money (which I don't), the ads would be useful hints of what to join next. But I'm willing to browse the ads to see what's interesting--sort of like window shopping, where you browse the contents, even if you don't have much money to buy anything.
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month for the entire network. Not a problem for me for 2 reasons: 1. I have a year-long membership. 2. I rarely download a lot. If I have an active membership, it's just easier for me to view/stream the content online. Instead of searching through my computer.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is no limit on downloading photosets. But the photosets are tiny, only 10 or less photos per set, so they are not worth collecting, even when the girl is attractive, because the photos, although nice, are not extra-ordinary. I've seen a lot of photos that by themselves are so gorgeous (the girl model is photographed so well) that it's worth keeping those photos, but none of the photos I've seen at the Relaxxxed channel are that special or worth keeping.
-In addition to the first page of ads that you have to click through to get to the member pages, there are ads at the bottom of each member page. But they are easy to ignore.
-There is a zip file for each photoset. But it downloads in only one definition (you can't choose low, medium or high). But since the photosets are not worth keeping, that's no problem.
-The photosets download with a generic file name of mixed alpha-numeric characters. So if you want to know what the file is, you have to rename it with model, title of set, etc. But again, not a problem, since the photosets are not worth downloading.
-A minor irritation. To list all the channels at the Lets Doe It network, you have to click the "Load More Channels" link to add additional channels. Which is irritating, because to get to some channels, such as Relaxxxed, you have to go through the "Load More Channels" routine every time you are logged out. And my laptop logs me out of the network a lot.
-I don't know if it's a server problem or my poor ISP connection, but I keep logging out of the site frequently, and have to re login. Not a major issue, but it's irritating. Again, don't know if the problem is with the site, or with my weak wifi connection that's causing the problem.
-This is off topic. I use a laptop with the WiFi signal from Spectrum. The WiFi signal is weak. The WiFi speed averages about 15-20 Mbps on a 200 Mbps connection. I was charged about $90 this month, and about $48 the previous month, for going over my cellular data limit. I normally pay $35/month for my cell phone. I talked to Spectrum tech support, and the agent told me my cell phone was probably using cellular data instead of my WiFi, because I have a weak WiFi signal.
This switching from WiFi to cellular data was done automatically by the phone, probably becasue the WiFi signal was weak. I went into the Spectrum office on Saturday, April 11, and the Spectrum agent changed the phone setup to use no cellular data.
But just as a special warning, which might never apply to anyone: you have to check your bills.
I am on automatic payments for my internet and cell phone usage.
So I didn't realize what was happening until I checked my last bill, and saw I was charged $90 for cell phone data usage.
That was a mistake. My cell phone data usage should be minimal: closer to zero than 1 GB, which is my monthly allowance.
But computers and cell phones can be tricky, and you can run up charges you aren't aware of, until you get the bill.
I shouldn't have been charged more than my $35 monthly payment, but because the cell phone was switching to cellular data from WiFi automatically, the bill was $90.
So, check your bills.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Number of videos: 130. Archive site. Last update 2018-07-10.
Video runtime: 20 - 30 minutes.
You can stream or download videos in different definitions: 240p through 1080p.
Photosets: 10 or less photos in a set. Only one definition, but not worth downloading.
Download limit: 100 videos for the network per month.
The channel Relaxxxed theme is girls who are relaxing (laying at a pool, getting a message, doing yoga). An attractive guy shows up and the girl becomes aroused, and they have sex.
There are so many porn sites, and they are always looking for some new idea to make things interesting. But the idea for this channel is lame and poorly executed. There are many fine or good massage sites, and this could be one, instead of the short, senseless pre-buildup of a girl laying at a pool, or doing yoga. The massage theme can be done very easily: it doesn't require much acting on the part of the female model, so that's one of the reasons a massage video is easy to do well.
The attractive level of the models at Relaxxxed is below average for the network. The girls at The White Boxxx are attractive to begin with, and they are presented as gorgeous glamcore models.
The models are Relaxxxed are OK, but when you compare with The White Boxxx, are a real disappointment.
Sorry to keep harping on this, but The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. The models are presented in glorious, living color.
The relaxxxed channel does have some massage videos.
They are nothing special.
I much prefer the massage videos at Tricky Masseur or the Dane Jones massage videos because they are simpler, focus on arousing the girl through a massage and then fucking.
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Maybe it's just me, but most of the male models at Hot Guys Fuck give off a gay or bi vibe.
The male models do a fine job fucking the girls.
And the male models are young and attractive.
But they just seem gay, to me.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to the entire network on joining.
-Seventeen series included with your Nubiles Porn membership
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login and member pages are https secure.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set.
-PU and TBP have an error in the yearly membership. A yearly membership is $99.95/recurring.
PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $199.00/recurring.
PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $99.95/non-recurring.
-Billers are CCBill and Epoch, both trusted names, easy to deal with, easy to cancel.
-Videos can be streamed or downloade in 270p through 1080p.
-Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set.
Cons:
-The photosets are basically a wasted opportunity of attractive models. Little effort is put into making the models as attractive as possible. The lighting is good, the sets(background) are good, but they are not trying to make an erotic photo record of a sex shoot. The models are not posed in sexy positions, it's just a record of a sex scene, without trying for an erotic atmosphere.
The models are attractive, but the photosets don't really take advantage of the models' physical looks.
And the site has a lot of top grade models: Jillian Janson, Mia Malkova, Megan Rain, Maddy Rose, Piper Perri, and those are just the 5 models in the earliest posted videos.
-Slow, irregular update rate: 1 to 4 videos per month.
Site started in 2015, that's over 4 years ago, and it only has 123 videos
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 123
Video runtime: 30 minutes or less.
Photosets: average 118-136 photos per set.
The site is classified as reality porn. Which means that the porn is supposed to be a slice of life.
Except that's a stretch: because the site porn is fantasy, featuring fake incest where step children have sex with each other or sometimes with their step parents. And the acting of the models makes it seem even more fake and not realistic. But that's one of the problems of much of mainstream porn: the models are not chosen for their acting ability, but for their willingness to strip for the camera and to be filmed in sexual situations.
If you've watched a lot of porn behind-the-scene videos, you realize that porn is a business, and the models are paid performers putting on a show. Which takes away a lot of the heat and passion these scenes can sometimes generate.
However, watching porn can be a learning experience.
Especially with a site like Step Siblings Caught, which can give helpful hints on how to be a successful person.
There's a video titled "Quarantined With My Step Sis" with Avery Cristy. She's a cute blonde model who's quarantined with her step-brother in an apartment. She wears a mask for health reasons because of the coronavirus epidemic, and she is cleaning their apartment.
Then Avery and her step-brother sit on the couch, because they are bored and restless, and they start to make out. I guess that being quarantined because of the virus has made them not just bored but also horny.
They move to the bedroom and the bed, and start going all out.
Watching this video, I learned there can be good things to relieve your boredom if you have a step-sister stuck in the same apartment you are in. You can increase the family closeness, and have a good time doing it.
Sex is the glue that keeps us together.
And if you can't go out because of the quarantine rules, sex is the best way to not only relieve the boredom, but it also helps to make a family healthy and close.
Bottom line:
The pros for the site include:
-A lot of pretty models.
-Site membership is part of the Nubiles-porn network, which includes 17 sites you get access to.
-The navigation is simple and easy.
The cons include:
-The plots for the site are stupid. Which takes away from the value of the videos.
-The models, although attractive to very attractive, are not good actors: that, combined with the silly plots, detract from the impact of the videos.
So even though some of the girls are very pretty, the stupid plots and poor acting can make for boring videos, and the site suffers. It's much better to watch an excellent photo site with great photography than to watch stupid videos of beautiful women.
I'm giving the site a score of 79, in spite of the fact that you get access to nubiles.net, which is a great site filled with photosets and videos of cute to lovely women. Nubiles.net by itself deserves a score in the high 90s. But Step Siblings Caught, in spite of the pretty models, because it's a small site, and because the plots are silly, and the models can't act, and the videos are boring and unbelievable, is a poor site.
Mormon Girls is a premium series at Team Skeet. Mormon Girlz, I believe, is a different pay site from a different company.
There are so many porn sites, some of which have similar names, so it becomes confusing to tell them apart.
But I believe Mormon Girlz is not included in the Team Skeet package. Mormon Girlz is a nice niche site that focuses on Mormon sex, which is probably what Mormon Girls does.
It's been a while since I was a member of Team Skeet.
But they seem to be expanding with a lot of different offerings, and some upgrades.
But $289/year seems like a lot of money.
You could almost buy a lifetime membership to some fine sites for a little more money.
For fans of the Team Skeet network, it might be a good choice.
However, if you do a lot of searching, you can sometimes find a yearly membership to Team Skeet for a low price.
The last time I joined was $60/year, in 2017, for the standard Team Skeet network (not including the premium sites). But it did include unlimited streaming and downloading.
When I say attractive, there are good-looking girls, some really gorgeous girls: the girls at Wow Girls, Wow Porn, X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, Vixen are presented more attractively and can be incredibly lovely, but the models at 21 Naturals can be attractive.
Not everyone appreciates this channel or the Adult Time network as much as I do.
Some PU members consider the sex at 21 Naturals bland and boring.
And the Adult Time network has critics who complain about the quality of the content not being top notch, or flawed in different ways.
That's people. Different people, different opinions.
I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
A low price, covering a wide variety of niches, high quality hardcore porn videos, unlimited streaming and downloading, and one of the best customer service reps in the business (because of the 24/7 live chat line).
I also think Pure Taboo, one of the Adult Time channels, is the best story-driven channel on the internet. Just a few of their better videos are worth the membership price by themselves.
Although most porn models are not actors, the Pure Taboo channel gives some of them the chance to really shine, and provide an erotic movie-quality experience.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
