Excellent comment.
With some fine warnings.
In today's porn, you could almost expect the no download membership version, but was the no download limitation pointed out clearly on the sign-up page? Probably not.
The poor navigation is also irritating.
But the best point is that your account was blocked immediately when you cancelled your membership, instead of being open for the days you paid for.
I would send an email to the PU staff, to see if you could get a partial refund.
The PU staff in the past have helped to resolve PU member problems, and they have more weight on dealing with porn sites than a simple individual.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Prime network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. You don't have to pay extra for any premium sites.
-Video definition is 540p through 4K.
-Zip file for the photoset of the video.
-High production values: Even though the site specializes in shooting dark videos and photosets (are they trying to save electric bills?), the costumes are expensive, the sets are expensive, the background music is tasteful, there is ample use of oils for sensuous massages and sensual fucking.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 19 videos (plus matching photosets).
-Slow update rate.
-Captcha required for login.
-Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages.
Bottom Line:
-Video content: 19 videos.
-Video runtime: averages around 30-32 minutes.
-Photosets: 19 photosets.
-Photosets run around 134 photos per set.
Site theme: Sex is sinful. Forget that sex is needed to make children, which is God's plan to replentish the earth after adults die. The site shows how people with twisted desires are having all kinds of dirty, evil sex: Blowjobs, pussy eating, masturbation, handjobs, pussy fingering, orgies, bondage, this site shows how men and women can cheat on their partners, and fall into temptation while doing the devil's work. There's also vaginal and anal sex.
The site features videos with not only dark themes, but dark lighting as well.
You have boy/girl sex, threesomes, one guy with multiple girls, lots of oil to make the naked bodies glisten with passion.
This is stylized glamcore. Trying for an aesthetic vision of raw, sinful sex.
I'm repeating myself, but I saw Emmanuelle (1974), the French softcore movie with Sylvia Kristel, and Story of O (1975), also a French softcore movie. Both of those movies had a visual and emotional impact that was undeniable. I believe the 1970s was the golden age of porn (except that the internet in the 1990s and beyond has also produced a huge amount of high quality softcore and hardcore content).
The great thing about Emanuelle and Story of O was the plot made sense, the acting was acceptable to good, the models/actors were extremely attractive, the colors and images were crisp and clear. I bought DVDs of those 2 movies from Amazon, and the DVDs were degraded copies of the original movies. A shame. Because those 2 movies were impressive.
Sinful Raw videos and photos use dark lighting to try to make the scenes erotic and sensual.
The sex is supposed to be sinful.
I think the stylized approach of the site is pretentious.
I appreciate the simpler style of Massage Rooms, where the scenes are more brightly lit, so you can see the models more clearly. I mean, if you have attractive models, let me see them.
Except that the models at Sinful Raw are not the most attractive models you've ever seen: so maybe the darkness helps to hide the blemishes, age wrinkles, whatever, and your imagination is supposed to be fired into thinking these are godesses who are getting fucked.
Except my imagination is limited, and I prefer the Massage Rooms videos, where I can see the lovely models, and see them getting massaged sensually, and then getting fucked sensually. Or getting fucked energetically. But let me see and admire and crave the bodies of lovely young models, instead of squinting in the dark to see what the model looks like.
Maybe they should have the models fucking in a dark closet. Then I could use my imagination, instead of trying to see what the models look like. To see what the models are supposed to be doing. I know they are supposed to be doing naughty things, but it would help to be able to see the naughty things they are doing in the dark.
Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, often uses dark lighting, which is also supposed to heighten the erotic mood. But Sinful Raw goes overboard with the darkness, and you often can't see what the performers look like, or what they are supposed to be doing.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
It's a tiny site. Currently 19 videos and matching photosets.
The idea of stylized hardcore glamour is good, but they go overboard with the darkness.
The videos show high technical qualities, except you can't clearly see the models because it's too fucking dark.
I much prefer Pure Taboo, a competing site from a competing network. Pure Taboo is probably the finest story-driven hardcore site on the internet. The Sinful Raw site videos don't have much of a story: you see models fucking, and you're supposed to think there's some story behind the fucking.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A tiny channel from Adult Time. There are only 11 videos and matching photosets at the channel. Actually, this is the Adult Time version of the site. I have an Adult Time membership through 21Sextury.com. I should also have an Adult Time membership from my Devils Film membership, but as far as I can tell, I was never given an Adult Time membership from Devils Film, even though Devils Film advertises that you get an Adult Time membership as a free add-on with a membership to Devils Film.
The SinfulXXX site still exists as a separate entity, and you can join that site directly, giving you a much larger amount of this style of content. There are approximately 200 videos at the SinfulXXX site.
Note: I've noticed that when a site is merged into the Adult Time network, sometimes it maintains a separate existence for a while, and you can join that site directly.
However, the separation can dissolve over time.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I have a membership in Devils Film, which became part of the Adult Time network a while back.
Until recently, I could log in to the Devils Film site directly.
Today, when I log in to the Devils Film site, I am re-directed to the Adult Time network, even though I still have a paid membership in Devils Film.
Also, my membership to Devils Film was through FameAid(the biller agent). And when I logged into my Devils Film site directly, and was automatically transferred to Adult Time, the billing details of my Devils Film membership were not available.
Since I copied my membership details to Devils Film, I simply used a live chat with FameAid to cancel my Devils Film membership.
Sorry for the involved explanation of how I cancelled my Devils Film membership.
But you need to copy the details of each membership when you join.
Because cancelling a membership can get tricky.
Especially when they merge sites and seem to drop the membership details of some of your join sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Site favors large-breasted women, so implants are common.
-They add a plot to the videos, to make the sex more meaningful, but the models are poor actors.
-For glamcore sex, I much prefer The White Boxxx, probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. Or the early X-Art videos, which can be more erotic, with greater heat, than the SinfulXXX videos.
-Adult Time has a pre-checked cross-sale. So does the SinfulXXX site. But pre-checked cross-sales are standard for porn sites.
-Uses a proprietary biller: VXS Billing. I'm more comfortable with CCBill or Epoch.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
This is a glamcore site geared toward sensual erotic scenes.
The target audience seems to be couples who enjoy racy sex. This is porn with a strong artful approach: the scenes are darkly lit, the video quality is excellent, the sex is slow and sensual. They also use oil or water on the models' bodies to highlight the sex.
Most of scenes are man-woman, but there are also some lesbian and two women-one man scenes for variety.
The videos run for about 20-30 minutes, which is plenty of time to show the slow, sensual approach the models take for their sexual pleasure.
Because the site has been partially folded into the Adult Time network, even if you are a fan of the site, I would hesitate to pay for a long-term membership (1 year) because you do not have any knowledge of how the site managers will treat the site: will the site remain a semi-independent site, with all of its content and any possible updates, or will it be completely folded into Adult Time? If completely folded into Adult Time, how much of the current content will still be available under the Adult Time network?
The site does an excellent job presenting high quality sensuous videos. But the connection to Adult Time makes a long-term membership to the site a gamble.
Take a month or two membership and download as much content as you want, is my recommendation.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Prime network. A fine, teen-oriented network.
-They change the home page of the Adult Prime member page fairly often, so you get a current picture of the updates and live shows and whatever else is happening at the network.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. There is a captcha, but it's very easy to read.
-Videos are offered in 540p, 720p, 1080p. No 4K option.
-You get a photoset for most videos.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Tiny site. Only 46 videos. 32 photosets.
-They were updating with 2 or 3 new videos per month.
But the last updates were in November 2021. So this might be an archive site.
-Videos filmed in Australia. The Aussie accents are intriguing at first, but I would prefer American English, so I could understand the dialog easier.
-The females can have under-arm hair.
The females can have pubic hair.
Hair doesn't bother me. But it's different from the shaven look of most porn models.
Bottom Line:
The videos are a change of pace from the normal videos shown at many porn sites.
The videos are seem more amateurish.
The colors of the videos are nowhere near as life-life as the videos at the Diesel network, or the Club Sweethearts or Digital Desire sites.
The idea of the site is supposed to be Aussie girls having kinky fun.
But that's a stretch.
Maybe I'm too jaded, but to me, watching these videos is like watching home made videos of regular-looking people with a bit of sex thrown in. The sex is not kinky.
In one video, you watch 3 young women in a cabin near some woods, they go out and hang up some laundry, they take off their clothes, they talk, kiss, touch each other, lick each other's pussies.
This is the Southern Sins site version of sin: minimal lesbian sex between 3 women.
Give me the videos at the Wow sites, which seem like masterpieces of artistic vision in comparison: Not only are the girls at the Wow sites absolutely gorgeous compared to the models at Southern Sins, but the videos at the Wow sites have vivid colors for the flesh tones of the models, the clarity and crispness of the images at the Wow sites is far superior.
It's just a completely different type of offering.
Southern Sins is offering you home-style porn: the men and women in their videos are plain-style people. The quality of the videos is what you would get filming your own family at your house or at a park or on the street with amateur cameras (minus the sex, obviously).
The site is worth checking out since it's included in the Adult Prime network.
Think of the site as a slice of life site: you are watching home-style, amateur videos (and photosets) of mild sex. The sin is in the idea of sex. If you see two people kissing, that is sinful. Especially if they are both women. And if they have plastic ties or handcuffs on the women, Oh, God, that is perverted sex. No matter how mild the sex might be. Or, my gosh, what if a man and woman have sex on a blind date: how perverted and sinful.
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
I really enjoy American porn more. Or European porn. That has a more glossy feel, better scripts, more attractive models. Southern Sins gives you home-made, simple porn that is very bland.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This review is based on the Spank Monster channel of Adult Time. There is a separate Spank Monster site, but I would not recommend joining the original Spank Monster site for a few reasons.
See the Bottom Line summary section of this review to see why I would join AdulT Time instead of joining the Spank Monster site.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in definitions from 160p through 2160p.
-The production values are good to excellent: nice sets, cute teen models, excellent lighting, good sound control.
-Even though the plots soon get repetitious, and I think the stunt cock (Jay Rock) is sort of slow-witted because he keeps resisting these cute teen girls who want to fuck him, I have to give Jay credit for picking such cute teens for his step-daughters.
-The models are cute teens or early-twenties girls. Not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of make-up. Very few piercings (except for the belly-button stud).
Cons:
-This is an Adult Time channel. So the navigation could be much better. If you try to bring up the Spank Monster channel listing, it might not load. Or if you try to get around that by an aphabetical listing of channels to find the Spank Monster channel, you can find the alphabetical listing is not alphabetical, but out of order.
-The camera work could be better. The video sometimes get out of focus. And it can have jumps, which should be edited better. Really, Jay Rock should hire a videographer to shoot the videos, which would make the videos better, except he probably figures the videos are good enough without the expense of hiring a videographer.
-There is no text file to explain the plot. But most videos have the same plot of the step-daughter seducing the step-father. Or a step-brother having sex with his step-sister.
-Few tags to describe the video. So searching by tags is not worthwhile.
-There are no model bios for the channel.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Reasons for joining Adult Time (which has a Spank Monster channel) instead of joining the original Spank Monster site:
-Membership in the original Spank Monster site is expensive. 12-month membership is $150.
You can join Adult Time for $95/year, or less if you join on a holiday discount.
-Spank Monster site is streaming only.
Spank Monster channel includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
Actually, there is a daily limit of 300GB at Adult Time, but unless you are a porn fanatic trying to download the entire network, that limit should never affect you. So I consider that unlimited downloads, rather than having to state in every review of the network that there is a 300 GB daily download limit.
-If you join the Adult Time network, you get access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, and over 50,000 photo galleries. Covering a wide variety of porn niches, with 1,000s of porn models.
If you join Spank Monster site, you gain access to over 100 videos, featuring about 100 porn models.
So Spank Monster site has limited content, compared to Adult Time, which has a huge amount of content.
Enough said. The advantages of Adult Time over Spank Monster site are self-evident.
The Spank Monster channel has 53 videos. This is 44% of the 120 videos at the Spank Monster site.
The models at Spank Monster are mainly cute young teens.
Mostly white. You do have a few Black, Asian, Latino models, but very few.
Spank Monster channel has 53 videos.
The runtime for a video is around 33 minutes.
The videos are available for streaming and/or download in 160p or 240p through 2160p.
There is an accompanying photo set for each video.
The photo sets have about 15 pictures per set.
There is a zip file for the photo sets, that downloads with a generic file name, such as 120595.zip.
So you have to re-name the file, if you want to add the model's name, date posted, site, etc.
But I don't know if the sets are worth collecting:
-The models are cute, but the set is a small number of photos.
-Some photos can be out of focus, or poorly framed.
-The main use of a photo set would be to download the set, pick the best photo that shows the model in a pose you like, and keep that photo with the video, to illustrate what the model looks like. And delete the rest of the photo set.
Spank Monster is a new site, started in 2021.
But in a sense, it's a clone of the Jays POV site.
Not a true clone, but the videos at the site (and Adult Time channel) follow the same plot that the Jays POV videos follow:
-You have a stunt cock (Jay Rock) who plays the step-daddy who is seduced into having sex with his step-daughter.
-Or Jay Rock can play the step-brother who has faux incest sex (faux, because these are step-relations, not blood relations) with his step-sister.
- Jay Rock is the stunt cock at Spank Monster, and also the stunt cock at Jays POV. He opened this site because another site will add revenue to his wealth, but there's no difference between this site/channel and the Jays POV site in theme or plot. So unless you are a super-fan of Jay Rock, join the Adult Time network for your Jay Rock fix.
Bottom Line Summary:
Forget the repetitious plots. The lame dialogue. The sometimes poor POV camera work. Some of these cute teens are so fucking adorable you wish you could be the one in bed with them instead of Jay Rock.
The girls put on a good show of seducing Jay Rock.
The videos are good to excllent. Mainly because of the cuteness of the models, but the videos are professionally shot from the POV viewpoint, which is not the greatest. I prefer a standard shooting technique which gives you better camera angles. But the sets are expensive, and the technical features (lighting, sound control) are good to excellent.
I'm giving the Spank Monster channel of the Adult Time network a score of 90.
Mainly because of how cute the girls are.
I don't like the POV camera-work, the lame scripts and dialogue.
So your personal score could be lower.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to around 30 different sites.
Most of those sites are teen oriented.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. Unlimited downloads is becoming rare for porn sites.
-Videos from the last few years are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2160p, in MP4 format.
Sometimes, the 720p or 1080p definition might be missing.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-Segpay was the default biller for me. Not as well known as Vendo or CCBill, but I've had no problems with Segpay.
-Limited information given for the models.
Bottom Line:
Network stats:
Total Girls: 1314
Total Photos: 1,332,666
Total Videos: 12,248
Total Content: 13,776.64 Gbs
Watching the first video with Lisa and Camille, it's just a simple, honest-to-God piece of enjoyable teen hardcore. Lisa is a petite, long-legged, energetic cutie. She's not beautiful, but she is fucking attractive, and she does a wonderful job snogging the stunt cock and lesbo-playing with her attractive female roommate at the same time. This is not glamcore sex like you find at X-Art (which stopped updating around November 2022, and will probably soon vanish into internet heaven). The videos are more like you will find at Teen Mega World, and not as glossy as the videos at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
If you get a holiday special, you can join for 12 months for around $90, which includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. A lot of porn sites are either charging extra for limited downloads, or eliminating downloads altogether. So the price is right for joining.
I enjoy the simple plots of the videos. For two main reasons:
The simple plot requires very little acting on the part of the models and the stunt cock, so it doesn't tax their limited acting talents.
The simple plot, once you accept that the models and the stunt cock are playing horny young teens who want to fuck, avoids the cringe-worthy plots shown at many hardcore teen sites, that showcase empty-headed teens who fuck and suck in front of their step-relations (step siblings, step mother, step father). I know that these empty-headed teens are supposed to be a parody, but the plots and actions are so stupid it interferes with my appreciating the hardcore video action.
The quality of the videos is good to very good: good camera-work, good lighting, good skin tones (which is helpful, since you can really appreciate how attractive these teen models are), good sound control, OK sets (not the cheap apartments many teen porn sites start out using at first).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Spoiled Virgins is part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to all 35 sites in the network with membership in any one of the sites.
-The main value in the site, and the network, is how many attractive virgins there are. These tender young teens are willing and able to give your their virginity because, underneath, they seem to be horny as hell. I wish, growing up, I knew how horny virgins really were.
-Defloration.com is a site from a different network that focuses on virgins losing their virginity. That site seems to give a more clinical approach to sex, where the sex is less spontaneous, but it also has many cute girls. However, I don't know if all the girls are really virgins, since I've seen many of them at other porn sites. How many times can a girl lose her virginity? In porn, evidently you can stay a virgin even if you get fucked in the mouth, the pussy, and the ass time and again.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photosets are from 60 to 300 photos. I think these are still screencaps, but the improvement over the I Fucked Her Finally screencaps is large.
-You can select the interval of the slideshow for a photoset from 5 seconds to 25 seconds.
Or you can download the photoset for viewing later.
-There are no limits for streaming or downloads.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is the site is not updating.
They don't show the posting date for most videos posted at the site. But checking the list of recent updates to the network, there hasn't been a video posted to the site since April 23, 2021. It's entirely possible there hasn't been an update to the site in years.
-The site (and network) doesn't bother to date the videos posted, except for a listing of recent videos.
-Videos download with a generic file name, spoiledvirgins_182_1280.mp4. So you have to re-name the file to show the model's name and video title.
-The earliest videos have a very low definition, 320x240.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
More recent videos have your choice of definition from 288p through 2160p.
-Videos are often in Russian, with no subtitles. But the sex is what counts. The plot is either minimal or senseless.
-A lot of pre-checked cross-sales on the join pages.
-Almost all links work to stream the videos. I only found one video that had no link to stream the video, but you could download it to watch it on your PC. The video with no streaming link was titled "Young virgin girl fucked for the first time under a doctor's care".
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Virgins are the real thing. There's nothing better than knowing you're the first one to bonk a pretty girl. And if you have a good buddy available, the fun is more than doubled by having a threesome with a virgin.
There's one video where a guy gets to fuck a virgin with professional medical help from a nurse. The virgin isn't feeling well, so a nurse comes over and tells the virgin she needs to get fucked. The virgin starts sucking her boyfriend's cock while the nurse supervises. Then the boyfriend starts fucking the virgin on the couch, the no-longer-virgin is so excited the boyfriend flips the girl over and gives it to her doggy style, and finishes off with a facial.
From virgin to slut in one happy experience. And the nurse is there to make sure the virgin and her boyfriend end up completely satisfied. This is reality porn at its finest.
The videos at this site are better than the videos at the I Fucked Her Finally site. The camera work is better, the lighting is better, the sound control is better. The models are presented better.
In Russia, they often have a medical doctor or a nurse available, to check if a virgin needs to be deflowered for health reasons. This is useful if your girlfriend is afraid or reluctant to have sex: you have a medical professional backing you up. And in almost all the cases I've seen, the virgin ends up happy to get fucked.
I'm thinking of moving to Russia, where there are lots of cute virgins, and the they are willing and eager to get fucked by older men.
This site does not feature older men fucking young virgins. But there are sites in the network where older men are bonking cute young teens. It gives me hope that I too can find happiness in Russia.
Giving the site a score of 85. The site is not updating. I think the plots are ridiculous. The girls are attractive, and the videos are nicely shot. But the videos lack heat. There are better sites in the network you have access to.
Holly slow, Batman.
I'm totally with you, bro.
Had a poor experience with a different site.
But I got a lot of failures with that site, so mine was probably worse.
Hoping you don't get a failed to download with your site.
But what can you do?
Grin and bear it.
And never join that site again.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. A fine teen hardcore network with first-class production videos and easy navigation.
-A lot of cute young teen and early-20s models. You find young cuties at many teen sites on the internet, but it's good to know that Covid has not stopped these attractive young girls from making good to fine content for us porn users
-The network has around 19 sites. Out of 19 sites, 7 are still updating. The Step Siblings Caught site has an irregular update rate, anywhere from 1 to 4 updates per month.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. Don't have to pay extra for downloads; many other sites are now charging extra for downloads.
-The photosets of the videos are worth collecting. These are real photos, not screencaps, and the photos have attractive models, good colors and lighting, nice sets, good focus.
-The player to stream/play the photosets online is fast and and easy to use.
Cons:
-Lots of ads. First page you see when logging in is a page full of ads. Then you get ads on every member page. Ads are part of almost any porn site, but since you paid for a membership, sometimes you get tired of ads and want to see what you paid for. Did I really pay to see ads, or am I just too immature to realize ads are part of life and to get past that?
-As a suggestion, if you are going to list lots of sites I might join, why not show the membership prices? I'm not going to click on the site name, just to find what the membership price is: if the price is really low, show it to me. Otherwise, stop wasting my time.
Bottom Line:
-Site theme is faux incest: sex between step relatives. This is one of the more popular niches in the last few years. It's supposed to be more thrilling or more perverted if you think the people having sex are related by marriage. I guess I'm getting jaded by watching porn, but the idea of faux incest doesn't rock my boat.
-The vibe of the videos and photosets is teens having sexy fun. It's straight hardcore, no romance, not much petting before the sex, just horny kids fucking. The girls are usually the aggressors, the stunt cocks are teen boys (or early 20s) who are playing shy or backward who are pulled into pleasing the girls. So there's supposed to be an element of comedy in the videos, which gets old fast.
The main pluses of the site (and the network) are:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is uniformly high. A lot of cute young girls at the site. And the older female models are mainly attractive as well.
-The technical quality of the videos is fine to excellent: clear, crisp visuals, good lighting and sound control, nice sets, nice costumes (the costumes are mainly street clothes, but regular street clothes, not cheap clothes). So it's a quality product.
The main negatives of the site (and the network) are:
-I wish they would get rid of the sophomoric attempts at humor and go for a more realistic vibe, or one where the girls aren't air-head nymphos seducing backward stunt cocks.
But the cute models keep me coming back for more.
Giving the site a score of 88.
Mainly because of the cute models. But the videos, apart from the stupid plots, are worth watching for the visuals. And you get network access to a boatload of fine teen models.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to the entire network on joining.
-Seventeen series included with your Nubiles Porn membership
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login and member pages are https secure.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set.
-PU and TBP have an error in the yearly membership. A yearly membership is $99.95/recurring.
PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $199.00/recurring.
PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $99.95/non-recurring.
-Billers are CCBill and Epoch, both trusted names, easy to deal with, easy to cancel.
-Videos can be streamed or downloade in 270p through 1080p.
-Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set.
Cons:
-The photosets are basically a wasted opportunity of attractive models. Little effort is put into making the models as attractive as possible. The lighting is good, the sets(background) are good, but they are not trying to make an erotic photo record of a sex shoot. The models are not posed in sexy positions, it's just a record of a sex scene, without trying for an erotic atmosphere.
The models are attractive, but the photosets don't really take advantage of the models' physical looks.
And the site has a lot of top grade models: Jillian Janson, Mia Malkova, Megan Rain, Maddy Rose, Piper Perri, and those are just the 5 models in the earliest posted videos.
-Slow, irregular update rate: 1 to 4 videos per month.
Site started in 2015, that's over 4 years ago, and it only has 123 videos
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 123
Video runtime: 30 minutes or less.
Photosets: average 118-136 photos per set.
The site is classified as reality porn. Which means that the porn is supposed to be a slice of life.
Except that's a stretch: because the site porn is fantasy, featuring fake incest where step children have sex with each other or sometimes with their step parents. And the acting of the models makes it seem even more fake and not realistic. But that's one of the problems of much of mainstream porn: the models are not chosen for their acting ability, but for their willingness to strip for the camera and to be filmed in sexual situations.
If you've watched a lot of porn behind-the-scene videos, you realize that porn is a business, and the models are paid performers putting on a show. Which takes away a lot of the heat and passion these scenes can sometimes generate.
However, watching porn can be a learning experience.
Especially with a site like Step Siblings Caught, which can give helpful hints on how to be a successful person.
There's a video titled "Quarantined With My Step Sis" with Avery Cristy. She's a cute blonde model who's quarantined with her step-brother in an apartment. She wears a mask for health reasons because of the coronavirus epidemic, and she is cleaning their apartment.
Then Avery and her step-brother sit on the couch, because they are bored and restless, and they start to make out. I guess that being quarantined because of the virus has made them not just bored but also horny.
They move to the bedroom and the bed, and start going all out.
Watching this video, I learned there can be good things to relieve your boredom if you have a step-sister stuck in the same apartment you are in. You can increase the family closeness, and have a good time doing it.
Sex is the glue that keeps us together.
And if you can't go out because of the quarantine rules, sex is the best way to not only relieve the boredom, but it also helps to make a family healthy and close.
Bottom line:
The pros for the site include:
-A lot of pretty models.
-Site membership is part of the Nubiles-porn network, which includes 17 sites you get access to.
-The navigation is simple and easy.
The cons include:
-The plots for the site are stupid. Which takes away from the value of the videos.
-The models, although attractive to very attractive, are not good actors: that, combined with the silly plots, detract from the impact of the videos.
So even though some of the girls are very pretty, the stupid plots and poor acting can make for boring videos, and the site suffers. It's much better to watch an excellent photo site with great photography than to watch stupid videos of beautiful women.
I'm giving the site a score of 79, in spite of the fact that you get access to nubiles.net, which is a great site filled with photosets and videos of cute to lovely women. Nubiles.net by itself deserves a score in the high 90s. But Step Siblings Caught, in spite of the pretty models, because it's a small site, and because the plots are silly, and the models can't act, and the videos are boring and unbelievable, is a poor site.
The PU internal email system has been broken for years.
I know for a fact that many of the emails I've sent through the PU internal email system were never delivered.
In a normal email system, if an email you sent is not delivered, you get an automatic message stating your email was not delivered.
But not for the PU internal email system.
So, unless the intended recipient responds in some way, letting you know he/she never got the email, you don't know if they ever got it.
PU needs to hire an expert to continually work on the site update it to keep it working.
But I don't think they have the money to fix the problems.
I was told years ago that the coding for the PU site was written in an old software language that not many coders use any more.
So that's part of the problem. The PU system is breaking down, and that's why all members are now listed as newbies, with 0 reviews to their name, because the software program that kept track of the number of reviews a member had accepted stopped working. Or why you can't review a site in less than a year, even though the rules say that you can review a site in 6 months after your previous review of the site.
But at least the site is still here, even though many of the fine members we used to have have vanished.
Wraith, good to hear from you, buddy.
Seems like interest in the PU site is slowly going down, older members finding better things to do.
I think the spandex, latex, and pantyhose is just to add to the element of sophistication of the costumes. Or you can think of it as a fetish thing. Personally, I'm not into fetish spandex, latex or pantyhose, but I do think it adds slightly to the overall vibe or sophistication the site is trying to inject.
Not a big thing, in my opinion, just adding a bit of fluff to the mixture.
I'm new to the site, but plan to go over the videos and photosets when I have the time.
Many of the girls are from the Metart stable of models. But I appreciate the clear, crisp images, the vibrant colors of the sets, and the lovely models. Who seem to be putting on a great show, one that is more believable than most of the hardcore lez action at other sites, especially the teen-themed lez sites where the plots are basically silly.
At this site they appear to be trying to show the attraction between two or more models that turns into a hot, seductive scene.
But it's early days for me at this site. Maybe I will lose interest quickly, which I hope not. Because from my brief introduction, this site seems like a keeper, for me.
I do remember the old PU days fondly, where there was a real community spirit, with members constantly jumping in with new, fresh reviews, comments, ideas. But maybe that's partly because of the glamour that time presses on our memories: "Remember the old days, when things were better." But if you look closely, the better things are what's taking place today. We just don't realize it until much later.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the sites under the Metart banner. This site features all the bells and whistles of the main Metart layout and features:
-Simplified layout, makes browsing the site easy.
-Premium photo sets, with first rate photographers doing the shoots.
So the photos are basically crystal clear, nicely focused, wonderful skin tones, etc.
-The videos are far superior to most videos at the Metart.com site: Two reasons for this:
-This site allows a far higher element of sexual hardcore than the main Metart site.
-Whoever is directing the videos (and the photo sets), is showing two women not only kissing, licking and sucking, but fucking as well (with a strap-on dildo, but it makes for a nice change from a guy boffing a woman).
-So the photo sets and videos are basically high-class glamour lez action with strap-ons, in wonderful color, with crisp, excellent photography for the videos and photo sets.
-The selection of models is top notch. These girls are often featured at other Metart sites,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
but here, they seem to shine even brighter. Maybe it's just acting, but the girls seem to be having fun and are into the sex. Which adds sparkle to the photo sets and videos. I have often complained that most Metart videos are boring, no matter how lovely the Metart model may be.
But at Straplez, I enjoy looking through the photo sets, and really enjoy the videos. That might be because this is my first time at the site, but it's been a very pleasing membership so far.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
-All content is exclusive.
-No download limits, which is becoming rare at porn sites.
-The models dress in attractive lingerie: nice bra and panties, nylons, stockings, etc. Which adds to the glamour of the scene.
-The newer videos are available in 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p, and 4k UHD.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Porn Users lists the site as "Strap Lezz". But the site calls itself "Strap Lez", with only a single "z" in the name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Photos have a watermark, but it's small and usually located in the bottom right corner, so a very minor con.
-Like all Metart sites, this is a stand-alone site. You don't get access to other sites when you join strap-lez.
-The video coding seems very inefficient.
The 4k UHD file size is large, up to 12 GB.
By comparison, the 1080p video is only 1 GB.
What is strange, is that the 720p video is also 1 GB.
(All sizes were for the same video.)
You downsize to 360p, and the file size is 415 MB.
Just look at the 4k UHD, which is 12 GB at StrapLez.
On Metart, 4k UHD videos are 3 to 5 GB.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you are into lez action, I suggest giving the site at least a one-month visit.
I found this to be one of the better lez sites on the internet. Extremely attractive models, simple but effective plots (even if it's just two or more females hugging and kissing and licking before they get into the sex). Plus the elements of sophistication and glamour and quality settings and quality costumes. There is nothing cheap about the site, the photo sets, or the videos. This is a first-class website.
The site features attractive models performing as lesbians.
Since these are porn stars, I don't know how many of these models are real lesbians, or just performing for pay.
But the performance these women put on is both sensual and erotic.
You get regular updates, unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Around 9 updates per month (a mix of photosets and videos).
Since the first month is only $9.95 (recurs at $19.99/month), I highly recommend checking the site out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get the bells and whistles of a first rate glamour network.
-You get absolutely beautiful photography.
-You get a catalog of absolutely beautiful young teen (and early 20s) models.
-You get unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Downloads are offered in multiple definitions.
-A back catalog of photosets and videos. 1656 galleries. 439 films. 533 models.
Cons:
-The main con is that the main Metart site is the main competitor.
-Stunning 18, like all porn sites, has been hurt by the covid epidemic. They are struggling to find updates. A lot of the updates in recent months have been old content shot years ago, but posted on other sites. Avril A, a lovely teen from years ago, has 39 sets at Stunning 18 in the last 2 years, that were all shot many years ago. The sets currently being released on Stunning18 are mostly from EmasPlace.com, a softcore website that closed. That was a solo model website devoted to Avril A by Thierry Murrell. Avril A was also at Metart, Erotic Beauty, and other softcore sites.
There are other models from years ago with old sets being posted at Stunning 18.
But unless you've have a vast porn experience, you won't be bothered by the older sets, since they will appear new to you.
And most of the models, like I say, are really cute.
Bottom Line:
Metart is probably the best softcore teen glamcore site in the internet. For several differnt reasons:
Read my review of Metart, or other fine reviews of Metart at the PU site.
But basically,
-Metart has probably the largest collection of photosets of softcore glamcore on the internet.
-Over 23,000 photo sets.
-Over 1,800 films. (Most films are boring, not worth watching. But that's a common problem with softcore films. No matter how attractive the model is, and some of these models are the most beautiful in the world, the scenes lack heat or excitement.)
-The fastest update rate for any softcore photo site I've ever seen. 4 daily updates, plus 6 updates on the first day of the month.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Photos offered from 270p through 1080p for most sets. They started offering 4K a few years back.
-The same low membership price as other fine softcore site. If you can get this for the same price, with so much more value, why not get the most for your money: if you want softcore glamour, go for Metart.
So that's why Stunning 18 only deserves a 90. Because it's up against Metart, which is far superior. Even though Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Stunning 18 has fine models. The girls are cute to lovely to fucking gorgeous.
And Stunning 18 has one advantage over Metart: it can have a harder edge to the photos and videos. I saw one video recently with 2 girls and a naked guy, titled "Anastasia - Helping Threesome", I suspect this video was shot for a either a competing site or a generic porn producer and posted at Stunning 18 for an update, because the film quality doesn't seem up to the Stunning 18 standards. But then again, maybe it's my eyes that don't see that well, because I have cataracts, and the images aren't as clear and crisp as they used to be.
Sorry to intrude personal details, but the truth is, when I look at some videos, they aren't as crisp and clear as they used to be, and the effect is noticeable.
Having said that, the camera-work in this video of 2 girls and a guy is not up to the professional standards of Stunning 18. And the set is slightly cheap. And the background music is cheap. So I think this is a rental video, or a purchased video, from some porn company. They are using filler to provide more updates.
Stunning 18 tries to provide value. If you didn't have fine sites like Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy in competition, I would join Stunning 18 right away.
But these other sites are the same price as Stunning 18, and they offer far more content.
So I would join these other sites, before I joined Stunning 18.
Even though I think Stunning 18 is an excellent site.
Stunning 18 is using a large amount of old content to post as new content.
Stunning 18 is part of the MetArt network.
The site has been using a lot of content shot years ago to post as new content.
Probably a result of the Covid epidemic, but it's a shame a first-class photo site has to use old content for updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is a softcore site. No hardcore action that I can find. That is a pro or a con, depending on your preferences.
-The site features some of the most gorgeous models in the world. However, there are many porn sites, both softcore and hardcore, that also feature many of the most gorgeous models in the world. So what was, pre-internet, very limited access to beautiful naked models, is now basically unlimited access to beautiful naked models, of all ages (18+) through the various internet porn sites.
-The site content is exclusive. This includes the photo sets and the videos.
-Navigation is simple. You have a limited number of models, and each model has both photo sets and videos. So the site is easy to navigate, unlike a megasite like Adult Time.
-You can favorite the models.
-There is a bio sheet for each model, which lists the basic physical facts and a tiny bio.
-Your choice of billing processor. I used Segpay, which appears to be the default processor.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
The site also uses Vendo, Epoch, Segpay, 2000Charge, Centrobill, WTS or PayGarden.
Note: I did a charge-back with a Vendo membership several months ago, because I didn't recognize the charge. I contacted Vendo, and tried to have the charge get re-processed, but Vendo said they take charge-backs seriously, so they refused to allow me to to subscribe to that site through Vendo. Vendo also blackballed me, and when another site that I had a membership in for years was suposed to renew, Vendo cancelled the membership, instead of processing the payment. I called the credit card company that was supposed to fund the recurring membership, and they told me they did not decline the membership fee, but, that no payment request was made. I also have another membership through Vendo that is supposed to renew this month, December, and that will also be cancelled for non-payment by Vendo.
It's not the end of the world, because I have too many porn memberships, anyway.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
So Vendo is saving me money.
Even though I have had many memberships through Vendo over the years, and never had a problem with them, until the single charge-back a few months ago.
CONS(START OF):
-An expensive site. You only get access to this one site, with no bonus sites that I'm aware of.
The PU discount is $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. Or $99.95/year (recurring).
And the listed site membership prices are often higher.
-You only get 25 monthly downloads. But you're supposed to get unlimited streaming.
I believe the 25 monthly download applies only to the videos. My guess is that you are allowed unlimited downloads of the photo sets, but if I find out differently, I will update this review.
-There were 2 pre-checked cross-sales on the join page. Both cross-sales turn into expensive memberships after the 3-day trial.
-The file name for the photo set and the video does not include the name of the model, or the date posted. A sample photo set zip file default name is: 12994-gallery.zip.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The models are gorgeous. Mainly Eastern European (from Russia and Ukraine). Mainly white. This is a glamcore porn site: by that, I mean it's softcore porn, where you get models in glamorous costumes, but strictly softcore action. This is a girly site, no men allowed, from what I can tell. Little to no overt sex. The model might touch her own body, but if there is masturbation allowed, I haven't found it yet (this is only my first month here, so I've only seen a small fraction of the site content.
The videos are artistic, beautifully filmed, to showcase the attractiveness of the models. There is background music to the videos, which is best played at low volume or muted.
I don't know why, but the photo sets at Superbe appeal to me much more than the photo sets at Hegre.
Hegre is a softcore/hardcore site which emphasizes glamcore photos, but also has softcore or midcore videos as well.
So the Hegre site has masturbation and some male/female action.
But the Hegre photos seem sterile to me. Even though the Hegre models are uniformly attractive or beautiful, the sets lack any heat or passion. While the Superbe photosets, although entirely softcore, can be extremely erotic.
Hegre sometimes has a habit of cutting the model's face out of the photos, which I find annoying. Hegre uses attractive girls, yet he cuts out the model's face, and focuses on other parts of the model's body. Maybe it's a fetish thing with him.
Superbe started around December 2020, so it's still a new site. The videos are offered in 240p through 1080p definition.
The photo sets are only offered in one definition zip file.
If you are into softcore nudity of lovely young models in their late teens and early twenties, I definitely think Superbe is worth a visit.
Normally the membership price is overly expensive, but they have holiday sales where the pricing comes down.
Currently you can join for one month for $9.95, which I think is a cheap price to explore which of these lovely models you can make your current favorites.
The main negative about the site is that you are limited to 25 video downloads per month. But I believe there is unlimited downloads for the photo sets, as well as unlimited streaming.
I'm giving the site a score of 90, because you get weekly updates, as well as a nice backlog of photo sets + videos for many of the models.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 21 Sextreme network.
-21 Sextreme network is part of the Adult Time network.
-Your login details (username and password) should give you access to all the channels in the Adult Time network. You don't need separate login details for each channel.
-Adult Time has 1000s of porn models, many of them A-listers. Covering a wide range of ethnicities (white, hispanic, black, asian, and tran[Is tran ethnic, or what?]).
You also get a wide range of model ages and body types.
The Teach Me Fisting channel is only a channel in Adult Time, so that channel gives you a much narrower range of models: mainly slender white teen and twenties.
-Customer support is Fame Support. They have 24/7 support, email or live chat. Live chat normally answers within a few minutes, and is the fastest way to get answers. The live chat agent is helpful and patient. I think Fame Support, because of the live chat option, is probably the best support staff of any network I've joined.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I used to think Metart support was the best, but they only have email, no live chat. Fame Support live chat answers within minutes. Metart support answers in a few hours.
-Many of the models at Teach Me Fisting are attractive: Zasie Skymm, Rebecca Black, Sasha Sparrow, Lady Dee, Yasmeena, Antonia Sainz, Elena Vega, etc.
-Videos offered in 160p - 2160p definition starting December 2018. Before that, the highest definition was 1080p.
-Streaming is unlimited.
-Download for the channel and the network has a 300 GB daily limit, which seems huge.
-There is a photoset for each video. Can watch online, or download in a zip file.
Zip file has a 1280x1919 pixel definition, and a higher 4000x2668 pixel definition.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor.
-The channel is an archive. The last update was 2019-02-25.
But the Adult Time network has 8+ daily updates.
Since the Adult Time network updates daily, I ignore that this site is an archive.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A monthly subcription normally is streaming only. I've seen some monthly subs that have both streaming and downloading, but most monthly subs are streaming only. The best way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly sub, which many PU members dislike.
-There's no model listing for the Teach Me Fisting channel. There is a model listing for the Adult Time network: but that has 13863 models (male and female) listed, which is a huge number of models to search through. A dedicated model listing for each Adult Time channel would be a nice feature.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
stats for the Teach Me Fisting channel:
Videos 656.
Video runtime is 20-30 minutes.
Photosets for each Teach Me Fisting video run around 80-160 photos per set.
stats (for the 21 Sextreme network):
Videos 5708
Hours of Porn 2378
Pornstars 1346
Teach Me Fisting is a lesbian site. This is a conscious choice.
Someone can argue that lesbian is not a conscious choice.
But if you open your mind, you might realize that a guy can put his fist into a girl's pussy, just like a woman.
Assuming the guy and girl are both willing.
Fisting is considered extreme porn. Maybe I'm jaded, but after a watching a few of these videos, I don't think fisting is that over-the-top. Just like anal is not that over-the-top. That's me.
Some bible-thumper would probabably consider any sex extreme, if the couple is not married in church and they happen to deviate from the missionary position.
The videos are professionally shot. Well lit, clear, crisp images, good colors, good sound control. Nice sets. Many of the models are young and attractive. They often feature 2 girls in a bedroom kissing before they move lower down for the breast and pussy and ass. So it's not harsh sex, but sticking your fist into a girl's pussy would be hard sex. So it's both romantic (the kissing and caressing) and hardcore (the fist in the pussy).
The main attraction for me is how attractive many of these models are.
Also, the videos have excellent technical quality.
Although the fisting is supposed to be the highlight of the videos, the girls can easily spend 9-12 minutes on kissing, caressing, sucking, fingering, before the fisting starts.
There are plenty of other lesbian sites in the Adult Time network. As well as sites that feature boy/girl sex. Some tran sex. And Adult Time is starting to add male gay content.
I'm giving Teach Me Fisting a score of 93. That's mainly because of the Adult Time access.
But the Teach Me Fisting site is worth checking out, if you're into attractive lesbian ladies.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Getting to be rare for porn sites.
-Videos are available in
-Exclusive content.
-Easy login if you have cookies enabled. Just click the login link, and you enter the member's area, without having to enter any login details manually.
-You have your choice of definitions from 270p through 1080p. Some of the newer videos have a 4K option. That is for streaming and downloading.
-There is a photoset for each video. The photosets average around 100 photos per set.
-There is a model page, with some basic information: the model's age, country, height. But little else about the model, other than links to her videos.
Cons:
-The main con is the site stopped updating in 2021. Before that, the update rate was very slow, averaging one new video every few months.
-Although Nubiles Porn is a teen-oriented network, most of the female models in the videos are in their 20s or 30s. So this is a chance to see some older females in the videos, if that's your niche.
-The videos are basically parodies. The plots are stupid and unbelievable, but you're supposed to be laughing while watching the videos. For me, the stupid plots and stupid dialogue destroys the pleasure of watching these videos.
Bottom Line:
The site is an archive site. It has 39 videos, with matching photosets.
If you can turn off your brain and ignore the stupid plots and stupid dialogue, the site gives you good to high quality videos: excellent focus, good lighting and colors, nice sets, good sound. The sex is basically bread and butter: not over the top gymnastics, but basic sex: cock sucking, pussy and breast licking, vaginal sex. Not a lot of affection shown in the videos: they are basically hump and fuck.
The kicker is supposed to be fucking your older teacher. The female models are supposed to be teens, but many of them are actually in their 20s. The teachers are mainly in their 20s or 30s, so they aren't much older than the "teens" they are fucking.
The site does have some cute models, such as Lucy Doll, Jessa Rhodes, Alexis Monroe, Piper Perri and others. But I can't get past the stupid plots and stupid dialogue to enjoy the videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites with a membership in any one of the Nubiles Porn sites.
-Login and member pages are secure. Https.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads
-Site (and network) is easy to navigate and use.
-Excellent search engine.
-Exclusive content.
-PU has a discount price of $14.95/month (recurring).
-Videos are availble for streaming and downloading in definitions from 270p through 1080p.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 36 videos.
Very irregular updates. You get one video in a month, maybe the next video is one, two or nine months later. So even though the first posted video is Dec 20, 2015, the site is small and growing slowly.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The female models are not attractive.
Bottom Line:
The site was launched in Dec 20, 2015.
36 videos.
Runtime is 25 to 30+ minutes.
The first 5 or 6 minutes is the models talking to each other. Which is supposed to be the setup. Then, suddenly, with almost no preparation, they're either stroking cocks, fondling breasts, or whatever else the script calls for, because these are horny models whose erotic lusts were just bubbling underneath their skins, and you couldn't see it until the sexual desire started to erupt.
The site theme is teachers fucking their students.
This is a common theme in porn.
The twist for this site is that many of the teachers are female. And they are having sex with their male and female students.
That twist is not enough to make this site exciting or memorable.
The female teachers are often MILFs, women in their 30s who look like aging porn stars.
Although the site describes the women as "stunners" or "oh so sexy", this is typical porn hype: the average teen or adult female you see at your local mall is more attractive. The Nubiles Porn network has a lot of attractive teen models, but the female models at this site are below average in looks.
The site tries to add a story to the scene: the teacher either is tutoring a student at the teacher's home or at the student's home. So the video spends about 6 minutes where the teacher is supposedly tutoring a student, then the female teacher pulls out the student's cock, or the female student pulls out the teacher's cock, and we're off to the races. The plots are stupid and unbelievable. There's no build-up to the sex: we're just watching porn models (who aren't actors) recite a few lines, before the female starts stroking the stunt guy's cock and having sex.
Contrast this with the Pure Taboo site, where the models have either been given some actor training, or they can naturally act, and the models create some tension and excitement before they have sex. Some of the Pure Taboo plots can be far out or unbelievable, but at least the Pure Taboo writers put some thought into the plots they write.
Teachers Fuck Teens plots are trite, stupid, and unbelievable. And it doesn't help that the female models are unattractive.
The Nubiles Porn network is a good network, but it has some clunky sites. Teachers Fuck Teens is one of the clunkers.
This is my personal opinion. Some members post comments for each of the videos, and the member comments are often favorable.
For example: "need more new movies of her.........lovely," or "she the best!" or "great scene."
Which goes to show you that what I consider sub-standard porn can be considered gold porn by others.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. The main positive about the site is that it gives you access to the Nubiles Porn network, which has some very fine sites.
I also use IDM and it can cause problems.
On some sites, when I click on a link to see a pdf file or new page, instead of allowing the pdf to appear or the new page to appear, it tries to download the file.
I don't want to download the file, but to view it online.
But I have no choice: so I download the file, then have to search where the file is on my PC.
IDM can be useful.
It can also be a pain.
LOL.
How do you disable IDM?
The only sign I see of IDM is a tiny strip that says "Download This Video" sometimes.
I don't control that strip. It appears randomly, I think.
Would like to control when it appears.
Would also like to be able to disable the program, when I want.
Are you able to control the IDM program very well?
UMBAR,
If you do join Nubiles Porn, make sure you visit (or put in a lot time at) Nubiles.net.
Several PU members have stated Nubiles.net is not part of Nubiles Porn.
That is wrong.
Personally, I think that Nubiles.net is the prime jewel of the Nubiles Porn network. Nubiles.net is more like an encyclopedia of porn starlets, most of them at the early stage of their porn career.
It has thousands of models, with a few photo sets and videos for each model.
I think the content at that site goes back to around 2004.
So it gives you a small amount of content for a lot of very young porn starlets.
Once you join Nubiles Porn, you can either access Nubiles.net directly, with the the same login details that lets you into Nubiles Porn.
Or you can use the drop-down menu, that is located in the upper right corner of the Nubiles Porn home page, that lists all the sites you have access to with a membership in Nubiles Porn.
There are some good sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
But my favorite site is Nubiles.net, because I enjoy looking over the models to see what they looked like when they were first starting out.
Also, if you look around, you can often find a discount to Nubiles Porn, or to Nubiles.net, both of which give you access to the entire Nubiles Porn network.
The discounts are common at holidays, throughout the year.
Joining any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
Wraith0711 used to belong to Teamskeet Unlimited.
But when they raised the price this last time, he said it was too expensive for him to belong.
I thought, even before they raised the rates this last time, the price was too expensive.
There are better places to spend the money, I believe.
Just my opinion, of course.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
