| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Grooby Archives
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If Grooby Girls is a good place to start when exploring transsexual porn, Grooby Archives is an even better second step.
Not really an archive by the definition I know of archive, updates 3 times per week. It’s more like a growing compilation site.
The best way to experience multiple Grooby sites without having to join them all. You get content here from Black TGirls, Brazilian Transsexuals, Grooby Girls and my favorite Ladyboy-Ladyboy.
Video quality does vary since the scenes are compiled from the other Grooby sites, there are a lot of HD downloads and some 4K.
Even bigger than Grooby Girls with over 8,000 models and over 40,000 videos. There are also over 2,000,000 photos.
Easy click tabs to switch from site to site so you can develop your preference. |
| Cons: |
Not for everyone, I believe it can appeal to all genders, just not all minds.
Maybe this site works against the other Grooby sites? It’s nearly enough to get the most popular content from four or five of their regular sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
While it’s not my favorite of the Grooby sites, this is the best value of the Grooby sites. You get to experience the different ethnic groups and still get a lot of content too. The video resolution shouldn’t be too big of a problem for most. I believe with the way they update this site the video resolution inconsistency can’t be avoided. I would recommend the site use a different name. Not being a native English speaker, the word archive, to me, means not updating, some place to store the older content. That is a porn-influenced definition. I would call it, “The Best of Grooby”. I don’t know if Grooby would be concerned that would make their other sites not look as good. I will say I avoided joining this site before this time. I just thought it was an old site with old content.
It does update, 3 times per week – on the same day. If you time your joining right, you can get a 5th update day in one month. Like the other Grooby sites there is a blend of action between solo and hardcore. I have said in the past, there are not enough transsexual with women scenes. There are a lot of solo scenes. That offsets the lack of with female scenes for me.
There is the other side to this site’s existence and importance or lack of. There’s a chance if you have been a member of the listed Grooby sites, you will have this content. I haven’t really run into that or experienced it much, but it has to be possible.
The best way to describe the Grooby scenes is by saying if you need a story, you’re in the wrong place. If you need a plot, you’re in the wrong place, too. If you want to look at the transsexual models in good pictures, the Grooby sites do transsexual pictures better than anyone – in my opinion. If you want to see the transsexual models masturbating and having very basic sex, they do that very well. They also offer you variety, especially on this Archive site. You have the white transsexuals that I associate with United States, parts of Europe and the UK. You get the black transsexuals. You also have the Brazilian transsexuals and the Ladyboys are usually from Asian countries. That is an advantage to me. I would feel the same way if I was watching regular straight porn. Seeing the different looks and complexions does add value for me. I think when you join a transsexual site whether you are a straight person or not, there is some newness that you don’t experience in most porn. Being able to see different types of models lets you decide which ones you like.
The site does work well, all things considered, it is a really big site. You can even see what I see and talk about just by joining this site. You can go from the archive content of Grooby Girls to the archive content of Ladyboy-Ladyboy and see how much difference there is in the way the models act. It makes Grooby Girls seem like the casting site for them. They do have some post-ops as well. I don’t really get into that, but it’s interesting. There is at least one major transsexual model that recently went through the sex change operation. I have seen her on other transsexual sites as a post-op. She is in one of the newer scenes on Grooby as a pre-op.
Overall, this is a very good site to join if you’re comfortable with transsexuals and are wanting to experience different types of transsexuals to develop your preferences. If you need one more reason to join it, it’s a little cheaper than the other Grooby sites, which I would call good marketing. This could be a site to get people more interested in the sites the archives draw from. I haven’t seen many promos on Grooby. I paid $29.95 for the Archives. The others are around $38. |
|
04-11-22 07:18pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
27
|
Dream Tranny
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Transsexual site that has two of my favorite transsexual niches – solo and transsexual sex with a female.
Large site with 560 scenes plus 206 scenes in their archive (first time I have seen a site have a separate archive). The site updates 3 times per week.
All transsexual sites are hit or miss with me on attractiveness from model to model. This one is too. But most are attractive with some very pretty transsexuals too. There are 322 models.
The navigation is very good. The search filters include everything you could possibly find on a transsexual site and that is good for me with my preference of solo/masturbation and transsexuals with females. Updates are easy to find, they even show previews of soon to come scenes.
Video downloads are available in 480p, 720p and 1080p. There are photosets with 100+ photos in 2000x3000 resolution, those are also downloadable.
The price is very good for this much high quality content. |
| Cons: |
Looking at the archive section, the video quality does drop on the older videos in it, but as mentioned, I haven’t ever seen a site split their content up between updates and archive. Some of the archive content has 1080p. A few of those scenes are just photosets. It is me trying to find something to list as a con.
The photo downloads all have the same filename. I have had that same problem on multiple other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of the better transsexual sites I have been a member of. My two biggest interests in transsexual porn – as a straight woman, are the solo scenes and the scenes of the transsexuals having sex with a female. It fills in a gray area between bi-curious (for me) and I enjoy watching penises masturbated. That’s not a niche that any genre covers well, but I do believe the transsexual genre comes closest and this site especially does.
Using their search filters, I can see that they have 25 transsexuals having sex with females scenes. I would like that to be a little higher, but that’s part of liking a niche that isn’t mainstream. Some is better than none. Where this site makes me very happy is they have over 200 solo scenes. The number is higher, but because some masturbation scenes turn into sex scenes, I’m estimating at 200 to be on the safe side, most of those that come up as masturbation are solo. They use something I can’t say I’ve seen with transsexuals and that’s a fucking machine. It doesn’t fully register with me since I am most interested in watching the masturbation. It’s definitely not a distraction. You see more of the feminine side of these transsexuals with the fucking machines and even manual dildos. These two paragraphs represent my favorite content on the site.
There is a search filter I feel needs to be brought up. Natural breasts. More and more transsexuals are going to female hormone therapy and developing natural breasts instead of implants. I believe that adds a lot of value to this site. As I mentioned, one of my interests in transsexual is maybe a version of bi-curious. The transsexual having real breasts really goes into that curiosity. The only thing that is masculine about some of these models is their penis. Natural breasts makes that even more noticeable and I also believe natural breasts tempers expectations on the natural breasted transsexuals performance. If she doesn’t have the full masculine hormones, there’s a good chance she’s not going to be able to create a large ejaculation.
The sex scenes are surprisingly long, with many nearing the 40 minute range and that’s just not that normal in transsexual porn. It is hard to believe, but transsexual porn has already formed its own version of repetitive porn just like male/female straight porn has, but this site avoids that.
There isn’t a lot to find wrong with this site. Maybe they could cut back a little on the ads? It’s not bad, but when you first sign-in there is the page with multiple offers of other sites. Every page on the site also has a few ads across the top of the screen, but I guess they have to make money. It’s at least not distracting. I have said before I believe sites need to cater to a more balanced audience. This one does it as well as any site does. It has around 1/3 of its content in the solo niche, the 25 scenes of transsexual with a female and the rest is transsexuals with men or transsexuals with transsexuals. I like seeing the different niches within the genre covered.
As mentioned, this is a large site with over 700 scenes (including archives). The quality is excellent for a transsexual site with at least 75% of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads. The downloadable photosets with the 2000x3000 resolution. The near perfect navigation. The addition of the “natural breasts” search filter/tag. They just aren’t giving me much to complain about.
It’s up near the top of my favorite transsexual sites now. I would like to see them add some ladyboys, Asian transsexuals, but there are other sites that do that. It’s just an idea. This site has earned its score. |
|
10-21-21 03:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Adult Prime
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Can watch on desktop, tablet, mobile, television, smart tv, Apple tv and Chromecast.
Updates from 86 studios.
Huge network with more than 17500 videos, 18,000 photos.
The trusted billers are Segpay or Epoch.
Discounted price from Pornusers.
Multiple updates across the network. |
| Cons: |
It's one of those networks that one month membership is not going to be enough.
Downloads were a bit slower than I am used to and that aids in needing more than one month membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has to be one of the best you can find. They have pretty much everything you could ask for, in large amounts and quality. You can find gay, bi, interracial, gangbangs, amateurs, skinny models, older models both male and female, classy story driven scenes, an award winning hot website and even a good amount of older vintage porn.
With 86 studios it is hard to describe all you get for your membership, which by the way is reasonably priced due to a discount from Pornusers. These are the biggest sites and these I feel are the most interesting. Most sites are updating and the scenes from the last few years are in HD.
BB Videos 422 scenes-German amateur porn, updating
Club Sweethearts 7096 scenes-European teens to early twenties, updating
Daring Sex 745 scenes-European, very high quality and multiple award winning, updating
Elegant Raw 304 scenes- European, excellent quality with many interracial black on white, not updating since last December
Fucking Skinny 542 scenes-European very thin models, updating
Group Sex games 241 scenes-European, lots of gang bangs, oldest videos are of sex games, excellent quality, updating
Jim Slip 750 scenes-UK older younger/industry icon where many pornstars have early or even first scenes, updating
Oldie X 498 scenes-European, older/ younger, updating
Pornstar Classics 2419 scenes-vintage
Rodox 1376 scenes-vintage
Submissed 771 scenes-European, eight bondage/BDSM sites, updating
Vintage Classic Porn 434 scenes-vintage
Young Busty 1250 scenes, updating
Some other sites that are included on the same themes. For example there is more vintage porn on other sites I did not list, BDSM and sites that focus on older/younger parings of older men and also older women. Some themes don’t have a site that specializes in that, but you can do a network search and find the content. Some examples are anal, blowjobs or lesbian. The ones I felt were the best include of course Club Sweethearts with nearly 7100 videos. These are teen to early twenties European models who are early in their career. I am sure for many this may be their only scene ever. The men they are paired with look to be about the same age, so they look like they possibly could be boyfriend/girlfriend. The same age and type of models are also on Fucking Skinny and Young Busty. The best in overall quality are the scenes on Daring Sex. It has won industry awards for Best Studio, Best Stars, Best Production and Best feature Film.
The member’s page is a bit different and takes some getting used to. It is not too difficult and everything is there that you need. The oldest parts of some of the sites are Standard Definition as they go back to the early 2000’s. The vintage scenes are what they are. This have to have the most vintage porn I have seen anywhere ever.
There are no download limits imposed by the network, but you will need more than a monthly subscription to check everything out. Then, you can take a look at all the streaming only content that is available as a bonus. |
|
08-31-21 08:46am
Replies (2)
|
Review
29
|
Girls Try Anal
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The title could trick some, this is a lesbian site, the trying anal isn’t with men, but it is what I like about it.
Only 116 scenes, but I found around 80 of those worth downloading. It is not updating.
Explores the way I want to believe most women would want to try anal first, with another woman, a finger, a smallish dildo, not a 9 inch penis.
Video quality is excellent.
Very pretty models including a lot that I do know by name even though I don’t know a lot of models by name.
Also works in some older/younger fetishes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating. This is a site I really like as my score shows. I would join a site like this for a year just for this content.
Some poor acting, often by the older female models, does take away from the believability of some of the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site does something most porn sites do not do. It takes a concept that is completely believable and makes it look like it’s really happening. I am basing that on the more exploratory sites. This is one of the most believable to me. A few models I knew by name Gia Derza, Nia Nacci, April O’Neil, who I believe is one of the best porn actresses in the lesbian genre. It’s nice to join a site with what I would call a small number of scenes at 116, but realize you downloaded more from those 116 than you did from a site with 4,000 scenes.
The scenes all touch on a curiosity and that curiosity is having their butt penetrated. Fingers, tongues, dildos all get some action. There is more to the scenes than just the woman getting her first anal penetration, not that I believe it really is their first. These are standard lesbian scenes with the guarantee of some anal play. These scenes are long to even very long. One is 75 minutes long. You get a lot of story, a lot of believable (for porn) nervousness, seduction leading to trying the anal and that to me, is doing porn right. It removes the feeling of they’re just doing it for the paycheck.
I could pick 40 or more of these scenes as my favorite scene. And that brings in the part I don’t like, it’s no longer updating. The last update was in 2020. The videos are high quality with all scenes having up to 1080p downloads and a handful having 4K.
I don’t believe porn makes enough exploratory scenes and other sites could benefit from looking into and considering adding exploratory. A lot of sites try it with the stepmom walking in with her stepdaughter trying to give a guy a blowjob or walking in on the stepdaughter trying to finger/masturbate herself. I don’t think those sexual acts are exploratory. Most of us figured out how to masturbate regularly or give a blowjob, or if a guy, how to give a woman oral. Having an older, more experienced woman walking in a younger woman putting a butt plug in her butt for the first time, that’s exploratory. I know many women who have never tried anything anal.
I do think there is a chance for disappointment with the site since I believe some will expect this to be guys with females having first time anal sex. Just from my experience and in talking to women, their first anal with a guy was accidental. Maybe this is too narrow of a niche to appeal to the masses, but it’s the very type of porn I look for and prefer.
The main deduction from the score is that it’s not updating. While I am happy with the scenes they have, this just seems like another wasted opportunity to make porn that gives you a specific niche you rarely see in mainstream porn. Maybe the actresses are just very good at acting and make it more believable. It would be one of my highest rated sites if it was still continuing to update. |
|
07-13-21 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Sins Life
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
In my opinion, one of the most attractive men in porn, Johnny Sins and his equally as attractive wife Kissa Sins.
I don’t know a lot of porn stars, but the ones on here are very well-known, Adriana Chechik has 7 sets, Veronica Rodriguez has 10, Katrina Jade has 7. The site is very professional.
Rare at least to me, reverse gangbangs and group sex with Johnny taking on 3-5 women at a time in some of the scenes.
Very realistic “diary” feel to the site. Some scenes start with Johnny and Kissa cooking and eating breakfast or one of them turning the camera on as the other one wakes up.
Most of the scenes have 1080p, but some top out at 720p, there is a con that makes that important.
Outdoor scenes, vacations, game-type scenes, very good variety to keep things interesting.
Uses Epoch, watch out for the pre-checked cross sale. |
| Cons: |
I had read there is a 5GB per day download limit, the bad news is, the download limit is still in place, but the good news is it’s now 10GB per day. Most of the 1080p scenes are over 1GB. I have only been downloading the 720p and haven’t hit the limit.
Way too many ads. The ads also look like scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
They say you never forget your first time. The very first porn I saw once I had moved to the United States was Johnny Sins with, I believe, Eva Angelina, there was a motorcycle involved in the scene and he was measuring her ass. I have always liked his scenes since then.
This is the site him and his wife Kissa run. I don’t know if she was a porn star before she met him, but her performances say she was. There is a realistic and even fun side to the site. They seem to really enjoy each other’s company and she’s open to him being with other women. Which I admit, I keep wanting to find one where she is with another man just to see if it brings out a more aggressive, more competitive Johnny.
There are nearly 350 scenes, and these can be what looks like a normal studio porn scene or Johnny using his phone’s camera to show Kissa giving him a blowjob while he’s driving. It is like watching them document their sex life.
I was a little concerned about the download limit since I knew I would want a lot of these scenes. I’m downloading 10-15 scenes per day and not hitting a limit. It says if you hit the download limit it will be reset in 24 hours or you can send them an email. If I download even 10 scenes per day, that would be 300 in a month or nearly the whole site. I don’t really like the scenes that look more like standard porn so I doubt I will hit the limit.
There are 122 models including some I haven’t seen that look like they should be in porn if they’re not. That number includes Johnny and Kissa. It does not look like they are currently releasing any new scenes. I know some sites aren’t or can’t because of Coronavirus, so I won’t count that against them. They did have 3 new scenes in April 2020, but none so far in May 2020.
There’s just a real factor here that you don’t see on most porn sites. One scene might only be 12 minutes, the next will be 47 minutes, it’s like following their sex life.
It's one of the better straight sites I’ve joined lately, and I will mention this here since I don’t know how long the deal is good for or I would have put it in the pros. When I went to sign up they had a special $9.95 per month price and said it would also recur at $9.95. I didn’t use any special promo or anything to get that offer. I just went to the site and it was in the join options. Great site, I hope they keep it going. |
|
05-18-20 10:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Evil Angel
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this site and have to say I feel completely overwhelmed.
I like a lot of hardcore porn -- I also like some transsexual and like most women, the male/male/female bisexual scenes too. They have all of them!
My account, joined on Halloween special, says 14,760 scenes, they have 60 male/male/female bisexual and 2,096 transsexual scenes. This will take me years to go through!
The site works well enough to be able to find those numbers above just by sliding a simple slider, but there's a lot of options on here I don't understand. I don't know who any of these directors are. |
| Cons: |
There's not enough time or patience in me to go through all this content. I need more filters.
It could be more clear. I click on movies and it brings up entire DVDs and I don't know if they are the newest ones or oldest ones. There's so much content it's like they can't contain it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've heard about this site for years. It lives up to what I've heard. I've already seen a couple scenes I wish hadn't seen. I've seen a few that made me wonder if a straight female that finds a transsexual woman attractive is still straight? I really believe the male/male/female bisexual niche is vastly underrated. They don't have a lot here, but I don't have any of these so I will definitely be adding those to my collection of bisexual scenes.
Some of these scenes have 4K. One of my current favorite stars is Karma Rx and she has an entire DVD on here that has her First Interracial DP, First Double Anal and first scene ever with a transsexual. Those alone are worth the price of the site as cheap as it is on holidays.
The biggest complaint I have is I know I'm not going to find 1/4 of what I'm looking for. It feels like they could have more filters. I know that they are at least related to Adult Time and that's what the navigation here reminds me of. It's not terribly, but you do feel like they could add some more options to it.
They have over 4,000 female models and nearly 1,000 transsexual models. I didn't realize there's a studio besides transsexual studios that shot this much transsexual porn.
Most of the videos have up to 1080p and some do have 4K, but I see no way to filter that to give an exact number. That part is frustrating enough to take 5 points off.
The content is mostly very hardcore, there's a lot of anal, a lot of dual penetration of multiple holes, including double penetration in one hole. They have small picture galleries with the scenes that you can download, most of the photos look like pre-scene photos.
I'm rating it very high because I haven't seen a site that appeals to this big of a crowd except for maybe Kink's network. They have every niche you could ask for, but they don't have a category search to let you separate them easily. Some of these transsexual scenes are very different. You will see a transsexual up a man's butt while the man, supposed to be straight is sucking the dick of another transsexual. It's absolute mayhem!
I will probably wait for the next round of holiday sales and maybe get a year to this one as I don't feel my month membership is going to help me find what all I'm looking for. |
|
11-05-19 12:58am
Replies (1)
|
Review
32
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best (non-fetish) hardcore site I have been a member of.
The amount of options they give you when viewing videos has to be most on any site and they all work.
Excellent organization -- is seen most in all the options, I could sit there and play with the different options for hours.
The scenes have minor stories and dialogue in them. It's not enough to distract you, but is enough to keep you interested.
The streaming player works better than any I have used.
The download options are the highest quality I have seen. |
| Cons: |
They have so many options that they don't tell you are there. I did not know you can skim directly to whatever change there is in the scene. It's a con just because how many people even realize it's there?
The search features need more options. There are none that I have found. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is one other sites should aspire to be like. This is the part I was talking about as a con. If you open a scene and select chapters it lists every starting position of a change in the video. Pussy eating at 6:10, blowjob at 8:10, reverse cowgirl at 11:15, this one scene goes through 19 chapters in 52 minutes! If you are streaming, you just click which part you want to see and it takes you right to it.
The download options include - Full scene, trailer, behind the scenes and the full scene options are, 4k, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The file size difference between the two extreme is 4K (10+ GB), 480p (1.25 GB). The scenes are long and involved, even engaging for the viewer. They offer photo downloads and BTS photos for download too.
You receive access to Adult Fidelity, a site like Teen Fidelity except with models out of their teens. Between the sites there are nearly 1,000 models and over 2,400 scenes.
The Adult Fidelity scenes also feature the "chapters" section where you can find the parts you're most interested in watching.
There is an added enthusiasm on these sites that you don't often see on hardcore sites. They release 4 new scenes per week and all are worth checking out to stream or download.
They have a bonus section that has over 100,000 streaming scenes from DVDs from major producers.
There are added personal touches like Polaroid photos of models in candid (usually nude) poses that they have sent in thanking Kelly Madison and her husband Jeff. Most of them have dirty messages written on them.
I have just been streaming for the site. That chapters option changes the way I view porn. I hate trying to fast forward to the exact spot I want to see, missing by 5 seconds and having to do it over.
The download options are so big I probably won't download a lot. I don't have enough hard drive space to go all out on downloads, but do appreciate the smooth playback on their streaming player. I watched 3 scenes yesterday without one buffer. My internet is relatively fast (100M), but it buffers on nearly every site I stream from.
The site gets high marks from me for their creativity. Most of the sites I have joined that offer creativity either go overboard with it or don't understand what creativity is.
The camerawork is exceptional, making some of the scenes even more hardcore than they are just by the angle they are filming at.
I would have scored the site a little higher if not for the upsells for their 5K scenes. I don't even use the 4K scenes.
I normally wouldn't do this, but one series of scenes is good enough for me to download and plan on keeping. The Stranger Part 1 and The Stranger Part 2. Those scenes set a hardcore standard. The models in them are Lily Love and Ryan Madison (Kelly's husband). The energy is incredible.
I'm not for sure why there's not more search features. The chapters in the videos show an obsessive tagging system to let you skip to each part, but there are no tags to find scenes like the one you like. |
|
08-19-19 11:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is rare, in my opinion, to see a site of unique, fetish content on a network -- House of Taboo is that.
Over 1,250 videos and 1,250 photo sets.
They are only averaging a couple updates per month, but there is a huge, excellent network included (DDF).
Should appeal to those that believe sites like Kink are too hardcore or too fetish-heavy. This is more like mainstream porn meets their kinky friend for a night of fun.
Rarely seen props and contraptions; in my opinion, these are probably made for DDF to be less strenuous or stressful on the models.
Very mainstream porn models are even in these scenes. With the content being exclusive I would think those are rarities. |
| Cons: |
Some of the models look overwhelmed even in the lesser restrictive bondage and props.
Not a high percentage, but 10% of the scenes don't even use a fetish. Maybe their costumes are the fetish? It's not a big deal. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink's Network is my favorite bondage, BDSM network, but House of Taboo shows a lighter, more mainstream accessible side to bondage and BDSM.
I couldn't possibly cover all the niches and fetishes they cover. You do see a common theme of light bondage. It could be the model's hose tying her legs open or bounding her arms behind her back. They use minor ball and gag devices as well. They have scenes with what I believe in a homemade pillory, head/hands through holes to present the model as helpless.
In the cons, I mentioned some of the models looking overwhelmed. For some viewers of this type of content that is a good thing. When you watch bondage porn both the male and female are usually equally experienced and adept at using the bondage. You don't get that feeling here. You feel like the woman just had her arms bound behind her for the first time. I wasn't for sure if that is a con or pro. Experienced bondage sex can become repetitive. I listed it as a con because that could bother some viewers. It doesn't me. The House of Taboo scenes are entertaining and most of the time you see a very enthusiastic struggle from the female model. In my mind, they are torn between fighting the bondage and submitting to enjoy the sex.
One of the biggest differences between House of Taboo and a site like Sex and Submission is the amount of major star models on House of Taboo. The scenes are on the harder side of mainstream hardcore, including double penetrations, bound mouth with anal and even bound mouth and hands double penetration.
The newer scenes (last 12-18 months) could pass for Kink scenes, that is how hardcore they are becoming. I will share a tip to look at the older content if you are looking for the less hardcore. The older content has more girl/girl scenes and lighter fetishes like urinating/nurse watching and even a fucking machine similar to Kink's.
It is a steady progression and there is content from 2006 - current.
I have not had any problems using the site. It could be a little better with helping me (you, anyone) find similar scenes to the ones we like. They have tags and they work well, but I have seen some scenes that the tags are not right on.
If you are a downloading type, the photo sets can be downloaded and this genre is a good one for photos. I prefer their download options of videos. They have 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The sites with too many options make it easy to click the wrong one. The streaming player is okay, it buffers a lot when I use it, but it could be my internet connection. The older videos do not have streaming option. They only offer downloads on those.
You also receive 16 other sites with the network. There have content in all of the mainstream categories.
House of Taboo is either my 1st or 2nd favorite site on the network. I will try to cover the fetishes I see the most often on it: urinating, light bondage, rough girl on girl, dual penetration, anal, costume (usually latex suits and masks) and props that could be as simple as a ball gag to a pillory. If I could fix one thing about it it would be more updates. |
|
08-11-19 09:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The genre-defining site for legs and foot fetishist in an equally as impressive network.
An incredible 2,789 scenes. The updates have slowed to 1-2 per month, but this site is 3-4 times bigger than the other foot fetish sites.
Different from Footsie Babes, Hot Legs and Feet has as many lesbian scenes as male/female scenes and Hot Legs and Feet has more hose, stocking and pants used in their scenes than Footsie Babes.
The oldest scenes are from 2001. I was not legal age in 2001.
Features the top models out of Europe. Photos are studio photo set quality, not screencaps. |
| Cons: |
An advantage Footsie Babes has is they use the same men in different scenes, most of them are obvious foot fetishists. DDF's guys are good, but not quite as believable. Hot Legs and Feet makes up for it with the lesbian scenes. There is an added level of sensuality when it is two women.
All good things come to an end -- at nearly 3,000 scenes with sparse updates, it looks like Hot Legs and Feet might be nearing their end. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I was to pick two sites or networks to score highest they would be Kink and DDF. The network included with Hot Legs and Feet is one of the best and most diverse networks.
Hot Legs and Feet is the best site for reverse foot fetishists. The women here do a good job of acting like their feet and legs are not a big deal. The men and women show them their legs and feet are a big deal. I do not feel a lot of sensuality in porn or get the erotic feeling from most porn. This site does both or maybe it is a combination of them.
The use of fishnet hose to showcase the woman's toes, thighs and vagina creates a visual relation between points of sexual interest. Their scenes with stuck stockings becoming impossible to remove while having sex show a precursor to harder bondage acts. It hints at artsy with the struggling female trying to enjoy the sex while fighting her bound hosiery.
There are scenes with the added bonus of the models removing their hose only to wrap them around the man's penis. Is she doing it to to let him feel her silky hose or to hold onto him and not let him get away?
There are enough scenes here to come up with your own conclusions. With nearly 3,000 scenes including a video and picture set each, there is little to no competition for them in terms of quality and quantity.
If you use their tag system you see they have nearly 900 scenes with stockings, hose or leggings in them. Those outnumber the next biggest foot fetish sites in total content. Someone might ask why not join a site with stockings, hose and leggings as their focus; those sites are usually tease sites.
The tagging system works very accurately. I do wish I could use multiple tags to search, but either it doesn't work or they don't have any scenes with mini-skirt, fishnet and handjob.
The most recent 90-100 videos have 4K option. The 1,000 before those have 1080p option and the ones before those have 720p option to download.
Besides all of this high quality porn you also receive access to 1 by day, DDF Busty, Hands on Hardcore, Only Blowjob, House of Taboo, Euro Girls on Girls, Euro Teen Erotica, Eve Angel Official, Sex Video Casting, Cherry Jul, Sandy's Fantasies and Hairy Twatter.
If you are into the legs, feet, hose, leggings niches, 1 By Day and House of Taboo mix those in on a regular basis. It is for me the best of the foot fetish sites and a network worth keeping a long-term membership to. |
|
07-28-19 10:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There’s nothing on this site except lesbian porn.
Pretty, mostly European models that I have seen on the 21st sites and even Nubiles.
Very high quality on the videos and pictures.
Updates on average twice per week. Sometimes they have as many updates as 4 per week. It’s not a consistent update schedule.
There are currently 1,817 videos and those are mostly long videos of 40+ minutes each.
Comes with two bonus sites: Give Me Pink (still updating) and Fist Flush (which has updated for the last two months) |
| Cons: |
If you don’t like a lot of white backgrounds, the newer scenes are nearly all in a white living room. All the furniture is white. I’m not for sure what they’re going for with these white backgrounds.
In my different times as a member of this site, the quality of the sex has been hot/cold. I believe it’s because the nature of the niche is repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
One thing I can’t complain about is how pretty the models are. I can complain that the models look a lot alike. When thy do get a darker complexion model she really stands out. Especially in the all-white living room. One of the better newer scenes has Alyssa Reece and Mia Split in it. Not only does Alyssa Reece have a darker complexion, the majority of the scenes captures the outdoor greenery and even some neutral colors like tan furniture. It makes a lot of difference! That scene is so much better than the other newer scenes, it makes me think that all-white background doesn’t work with pale models.
The quality is really high on this site and the network it belongs to – Sapphix. This network is focused on women. Give Me Pink is all women. Fist Flush is women fisting women. If you’re tired of seeing hairy asses and balls this is a really good network for you. The quality on the videos includes downloads up to 4K and those have been 4K since December 2015. They also give you the options of 1080p, 720p, 540p and mobile. You won’t see many of their videos with lower than 720p. Some of their 2005 videos have 720p and 1080p. They have been doing high quality for a very long time. That is a good part. The older scenes are easily better. If you like tribbing there’s a lot of it on this site. The quality of the older videos is important not just because those are better. There are more of them. From looking at the updates, it looks like, at one time 2005-2008, they were releasing a new scene every 2-3 days. I also believe the models in the older scenes were some of the top models in the world. It seems like the older scenes were more hardcore if that’s possible. There are a lot of 3 female scenes, some of those are 3 females masturbating furiously together. I don’t see that much in newer lesbian scenes. The videos are not only downloadable, but from what I see there is no limit. The pictures are very good quality and downloadable. Those are photo sets that have file sizes reminiscent of videos, over 500 MB each.
The only complaint I really have is about the newer scenes. That white background, the models not as much into it. When I look at the models in the older scenes, I’m not surprised the models aren’t as into the scenes. Some of those old scenes have three women that are legitimate 10s. You’ll have some color-shock if you watch the older scenes. They had blue chairs and hippy looking sheets, brightly colored beach towels.
The site is very big with nearly 2,000 scenes. A lot of the prettier, sexier models in the older days of the site have over 10 scenes each. It surprised me when this site become a part of the Sapphix network. I never had any problems joining this site and being satisfied with just it. It’s almost too big by itself for a one month membership.
This is very believable, to me, lesbian porn. These women look like they are loving it (especially older scenes) and they’re really pretty to look at. I just come away with the feeling that the production changed sometime over the last 5 years, and someone took it in the wrong direction. The newer scenes try to be more softcore, but the sex is not. The models are still doing 69s and rimming even on the white furniture. I would like to see the site go back to its older style which reminded me of the old Vivid DVDs. It was pretty women doing dirty things. Maybe the all-white background has made me view those scenes as more innocent. It’s not the models are just not as into it? It’s still an easy site to recommend for those that like to see pretty women naked and doing sexual things. |
|
08-05-22 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Ultra Films
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with three other sites, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn
There is a promotional rate of if you pay for one month and you get another free
The biller is Vendo and you can pay with cryptocurrency as well
The videos are available in 4K if that works for you. Some are even 6K. I am happy with just high definition.
The website is easy to use. Including a welcome email that has a link to click that signs you automatically. |
| Cons: |
Separate log in for this site from the other three
Would like to see them make one of the three still updating sites a little different, maybe some fetish content? |
| Bottom Line: |
Ultra Films has a special promotional rate of pay for one month and get one free and you also get three other similar sites in the same package. The deal actually works out better as buy one, get one than as simply half price, as they have a frequent update schedule. Ultra Films has been having either a video or a photo set added every day recently. I found that the longer I was a member, the longer I wanted to stay.
For me the major draw is that the models are pretty and perform well. They are mostly Eastern Europeans and therefore mostly white and thin. The scenes are very hot to watch as well. Some of the bigger name stars to be found here are Serina Gomez, Rebecca Volpetti, Cindy Shine, Lady Dee, and Sofi Goldfinger. The fact that they are mainstays on sites from Eastern Europe shows just how beautiful they are as well as the fact that they can make any scene they are in sizzle. There are also many other models that added to the value of the site, but I don’t recognize them.
As of today they have more than 480 videos and nearly 1100 photosets. The sex includes boy/girl heterosexual with 150 videos, more than 360 scenes tagged as including masturbation or 130 tagged as lesbian. As you can see, the tags come to more than the total number of videos. They are artistic and show the talents of the women very well. I think these can have a lot to offer women who appreciate that the women are the stars much more than the men and the men have their role to play too. The cumshots are big enough, mostly they are external, and the guys have nice looking penises.
The scene that is the highest rated is called “Inexplicably Wonderful”. It has five women and one very lucky guy. They are in a park and use the bench to make a very memorable scene. Outdoor scenes often have poor lighting and group scenes often have weak camerawork. But this scene breaks those chains and I love the models and the attention to detail.
The navigation is easy and intuitive. There are both tags and filters to help you find what you are looking for. The downloads are really fast and I think maybe even the best I have ever experienced. The video quality is state of the art with recent offerings having four download choices, the usual high definition, a better quality high definition, 4K and even that rarity, 6K. As if that were not enough, you also have a choice between 30 frames per second and an even better 60 frames.
The other three sites that are included in a membership are Wow Girls, Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. They are more similar than different, the members pages are laid in the same way and feature a lot of the same models. If you like the quality, you will find the quantity very well worth making these sites worth joining. |
|
03-20-22 10:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Trans500
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No longer operating as a network but is still a great transsexual site.
Currently showing 718 scenes which is lower than it used to be. It looks like they have removed older content.
A real strong point that is often overlooked by transsexual sites, full picture sets of the transsexual model. Those are downloadable but could use a better resolution option. They offer 1600px and 1000px.
Video downloads are up to 4K. I haven’t run into download limits.
As is this case with all transsexual sites, some models with appeal to one group, the other models will appeal to another group. All are attractive. There are some of the prettiest transsexuals models on this site.
Joining, cancelling, can be performed through Paypal/Epoch now. I noticed the comments about cancellation problems. |
| Cons: |
It is always the case with a site this big. There are some of these models that I’m just not into. I prefer the feminine looking transsexuals. There are a lot that are feminine, but you will always almost get some that are not.
Preferred the older format of the site which was broken into networks/themes. Everything is now grouped together. They are known for one niche I like a lot (solo), those scenes are now mixed in with the regular scenes. Filters help but are reliant on someone tagging them properly.
Scene count has dropped. |
| Bottom Line: |
Trans500 still advertises itself as a network but the only way you can use it a network is to search the sites names “Trans at Play” for example. Since they have removed some scenes, it makes it difficult to take the search results as accurate.
What this site does is focus on the transsexuals. It is probably as close as you will get besides Grooby, to finding glamorous transsexuals. The very good pictures. Even their outfits, the teasing and I have said before, a transsexual teasing is something porn does not do enough. The transsexual has the ultimate tease. I do know this site had some connections to some of the bigger networks. The male that is in the scenes has been on, I think, Reality Kings, Bang Brothers and a few others. He just kind of gets in the way, to me. What makes him acceptable is he seems to know that. He seems like a relatively humble guy. I don’t know if he’s that into transsexuals that he can’t stay away or what.
I was a member of this network a few years ago. I will show the missing scenes just to show why it’s kind of frustrating. On my hard drive, under Trans500, I have over 600 scenes. I know that I didn’t download everything. Under the specific heading, “Trans at Play” I have 412 scenes. The site doesn’t even have that many if you search for Trans at Play. Their advanced search engine still has the option to filter by site. I used it to select Trans at Play. It came back with 23 pages of results. None of the pages after page 1 work. You click on 2, it tries to open the page but there’s nothing there.
If you don’t know that it is not as big of a deal. They are updating. If you look into their older scenes. You see a lot of gaps where they’ve removed scenes. I believe I saw a few from 2003, 2004, it jumped to 2009. They’re not reusing the content. The new updates have 4K option and are ones I haven’t seen. It just looks like they wiped out all their older content except for a very few scenes.
It still is a good transsexual site, especially if you like solo transsexuals. There are around 100 solo scenes that show up in a search but it’s higher than that. It’s more in the 200 scene range. I know this could be offensive to say. Most of the solo transsexual models are the prettiest to me. It’s disappointing to see that they removed content and no longer let the network work like it used to. The sites they originally had were Trans At Play, I Kill It TS, BehindTrans500, Super Ramon and TS Girlfriend Experience. When they had that style of site, you knew which sites have the solo scenes. You didn’t need a search engine. The advanced search engine is good for what it is. It shows sloppiness to me. They blend the individual model names in with the tags and niches.
Even with these problems, you can avoid all that and just go through the updates. I do that and I use the solo tag. I have found that just scanning through the scenes is a better way to do it. They do have a few scenes of post-op transsexuals including pre-op female going to become a male. I think that is interesting. Even as a transsexual fan, I never really thought about the women that have sex change to a dick.
The site updates once per week. They could even improve how the video downloads are listed. There are these options on the newer scenes: 4K, high, medium, low. High is 1080, medium is 720 and low is 480p. I am sticking to that sloppy or lazy comment. They have very good content. If they improved the pictures resolution. Cleaned the site up so the search engine can work properly or go back to the network style, it would score even higher than I’m scoring, probably even 10 points more. I have been on sites that underwhelm me with this content but have good management, navigation and everything is clear, and scored those higher than I felt those sites were in my subjective opinion. This one is the opposite. I happen to know there’s more scenes. Still recommended. |
|
02-08-22 06:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Oldje 3Some
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
For me, the ultimate older man/younger woman fantasy site. This may be unique as a focus for a site.
Great looking women who make the fantasy even better
The site has 114 videos available to download
Every video is 1080p, but no 4K.
Easy to navigate |
| Cons: |
Does not come with any other sites
Price is high, needs a PU discount |
| Bottom Line: |
When I joined the Sensual Girl Network, I found that my favorite site in it was Oldje. It is an icon in the niche of older men paired with younger women and I highly recommend it. I could not help but notice that they also offered a very similar site, Oldje Threesome with older men paired with two or more much younger and very beautiful women. I would have preferred that it had been offered as a package with Oldje, but they don’t. In fact, there are no extra sites that come with a membership. You get what you pay for in life and in porn as well. This is extremely high quality and they get only the best models to appear here.
I love fantasy in my porn and this site was an erotic experience that was well worth the extra membership. If you like Oldje, I expect that you would love this site. While Oldje is a much bigger site, this one has 114 stimulating updates that do not appear there. You could even call them impossible and certainly improbable fantasy experiences. Every video is in 1080p Full High Definition, but there is no option for a 4K monitor. That is just fine with me, but I really wanted to use my new 4K monitor.
Give me a man with a nice beard, a little gray hair and a paunch and my knees grow weak. I think this is a man who knows how to treat a lady with kindness and respect and who represents men at their best. Many men around my age do not care if their female partner is satisfied and take us for granted. Older men are grateful and know how to show it. In many cases, their longer years of sexual, as well as life experience, might be able to teach us a thing or two. Based on what I have read, younger men are not as masculine as men of a number of years back. I don’t want a man I can push around, I want one who is self confident enough to be dominant when that makes sense and let me be dominant when it makes me feel I need it. I can relate to these women as I also see these men as hot.
The guys on the site are assertive as well as grateful. I see no contradiction in this, but it means that the woman is empowered as a female with needs. They are not the biggest down there that I have ever seen in porn, but I see them as more than just sex objects. In my culture, older men are seen as power icons, whose approval is gratifying. This type of porn appeals to my sense of self worth. To put it simply, younger men are more into themselves and their own needs than those of the woman he is with. An older man savors the experience at a slower and less rushed pace.
For the most part the guys on the site seem to be someone you might meet in real life and there is nothing unusual about them as far as I can see. They do not have monster cocks or do circus acts with the women. They massage and warm up these women, finger them and eat pussy like it is the best, most enjoyable thing they have ever done in their lives. I swear some of them seem like they are so happy to be doing this stuff that they would be on the site for free. Hell, maybe they would pay to be here with these women as this may be the best sex they have ever had. I am not sure, but would guess that for them the satisfaction does not require that they themselves orgasm. How many women can say that they had sex with a guy who was dedicated to selflessly making her feel wonderful more than his own gratification?
The women have a great appeal as far as looks and enthusiasm for these men. The age difference is a major factor in the heat as a man old enough to be her grandfather is seen as more than enough to show her a good time. I was surprised at some of the sex and how well it worked. The heat was very obvious and worked for me. It was a visual experience that was well worth the monetary cost. |
|
02-05-22 11:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
39
|
Family Screw
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I scored high when it was just starting out and it has grown nearly 3 times as much.
Multiple niches: It has the stepfamily, older/younger, group, that is one reason I scored it high when I first joined it 2 years ago.
All scenes have up to 4K downloads and there are now 63 scenes.
The site is very easy to navigate.
Some of the female models are very pretty. I don’t think that is an important part of this site.
American culture gets a pro. In India, having sex with a stepsibling is not considered taboo. I have been here long enough to accept it as taboo. |
| Cons: |
There will be people that say some of these women are not attractive. I agree with that. I think that is what they are going for. I will explain.
The scenes are not long enough. You won’t convince me a scene with 6 people in it is over in 22 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found this site when I was looking for older/younger porn a few years ago. It was very new with only around 20 scenes, but I really liked it. I do approach these older/younger scenes with the mindset that the whole point of that genre is one of the people, usually the older one, isn’t supposed to be attractive. Their sexual experience and ability make them attractive to these younger, inexperienced people. That is how I look at it. If you think that’s crazy, one of the scenes on here is “stepgrandmother gets her boys a stripper”.
A scene I would recommend anyone to see what I am talking about is “Fucking stepgrandmother”. The woman is not attractive. For her age, she is not bad, and she has large breasts. The stegrandsons look 18-21 and they are all skinny, college boys and she has sex with all of them. That is one of those the time seems too short. That could add realism that the boys couldn’t last.
I forgot to mention in the pros, the site updates around 2 times per month. I could see some months having 3 based on the update schedule.
The part I really like is the scenes that have young men and old men with the same women. You can see the natural competitiveness from the older men. They are trying to keep up with the younger man. It makes it sexy.
There are 63 scenes, all 63 are worth downloading, if you are into this niche and genre. I believe the older/younger mix and making a lot of groups, goes beyond the stepbrother with stepsister that we usually see. This is another cultural one. In Indian culture, we do not use just uncle, aunt, our words are different based on which side of the family the uncle or aunt is on. It leaves me a lot of room for using imagination and fantasies. That is a big part of my enjoyment of porn. I’m not going to score it much higher than I did before. It still is the same site with the same potential. They will have to eventually find new, creative ways to stop this site from becoming stale. All the videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. Everything is in place for the site to be very good. The only problem I really see is they have several of these older/younger sites and several stepfamily sites. I don’t understand the planning there. I would combine them and have a few updates per week. I still do like the site a lot. It could be a female perspective of being more mental than physical. The scenes are generally fun, too. |
|
01-12-22 08:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Cuckoldest
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This one hit two of my fetishes: cuckolds and older men
There are only 28 scenes at this point. They are only updating once per month.
Good enough scenarios, the titles kind of tell you what the scenes are about.
Excellent video quality and unlimited downloads.
Some bisexual parts with the men.
The models are all attractive except that little slim, young guy. |
| Cons: |
It’s a small site and it is not going to grow very fast at one update per month. This is a site they should be focusing on.
Any cuckold scene has the feeling of it’s not a real couple and that does hurt some believability. |
| Bottom Line: |
The basis of this site is like most cuckold sites. The difference is most cuckold sites have people of similar age. This one does not. This has older husbands with wives that look late 20s to late 30s and they get the believable cuck story. She tells her older husband, she is young and horny, he is not satisfying her. He doesn’t want to lose his younger, sexy wife, so he finds a young stud to have sex with her while the husband watches or videos (that’s more in real-life, I think). I have never seen a cuckold site that truly portrays the cuckold properly. The way the cuckold is shown is fundamentally correct. They almost always show the cuckold as submissive and weak. I have worked in the field that covers this and it’s not a true representation. It’s okay for 3 out of 5 scenes. The other two need to be the male being dominant, even as he shares his wife. He is receiving an adrenaline rush and competitive boost by watching his wife with another man. It seems like porn would love shooting that style, but they do not.
There is one guy that is in most of the scenes. He’s a handsome guy, bearded, muscular and well-endowed. The scenes with the much older husbands are easily the best. I believe a man’s ego lowers as he gets older. He may enjoy watching his young wife have sex. They have one of my favorite older male porn stars, his name is John M. I find him very attractive for the old “porn” role. The younger guy that is in most of the scenes has the stereotypical name of Peter Stallion. That makes me laugh just to type.
The part I am glad I looked at KayTBuffs review to see, there is bisexual parts between the men. Porn does not realize that ends the cuckold part. If the husband is bisexual, it’s a bisexual threesome. They also have the older guy that is in many older/younger scenes Dirty Gunther, he’s okay, I think he is getting close to being too old. He gives his all in his performances, but you can see he is probably going to pump his last breath out of him.
I don’t know if it’s because these are Europeans. The young men in these scenes seem to be very comfortable with the bisexual parts with the older men. That is something I like a lot about this network. The scenes are fun and happy. You see smiles and thumbs up. I think this site reaches as broad of an audience as any site could. The gay porn fans I know love the daddy/son, you get that. You get the sharing. You get older/younger, bisexual, if they add a transsexual they have everything covered.
This site will be one I will keep an eye on and plan on downloading the one new scene per month. The newest scene on it is probably the best for straight men. The woman is very attractive. I do think this is part of the future of porn. If you look at amateur sites the cuckold, the bisexual man, it is all becoming more common. I reviewed a site earlier about older women that was updating 4 times per month. If that could do that on this site, I believe they could have a real winner on their hands. I know that most straight guys won’t agree, but there is something sexy to me about seeing a younger man having sex with a younger woman, while her older husband licks both of them, at the same time.
Very recommended just for the various niches it covers. |
|
01-12-22 08:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Lesbian Sistas
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Darker-skinned lesbians that I believe include Latinas and possibly women from India.
While the site isn’t a large site with 78 videos, this is a niche I haven’t seen hardly anywhere. The action and quality make up for the smaller size.
All 78 scenes have a minimum of 1080p as the highest download option, 12 of the scenes have 4K.
Each scene has photo and screencap downloads.
The models are not only pretty, but I also don’t believe it’s that common to have a lesbian site with darker complexion models.
There is a thought most of these women really are lesbians or they are very good actresses. |
| Cons: |
There are no dates on the scenes and from what I’ve read the network no longer updates. These are still worth downloading.
There seems to be some technical problems with the site. The downloads for the picture zips comes up as potentially dangerous due to an unsecure connection. The videos take a while to load to stream too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like lesbian porn especially when it is of women that are possibly real lesbians and not just actresses. These women are very pretty, nice bodies and some of the positions they get themselves turned into makes me think they have experience in being with another woman.
Most of the scenes are long (30 minutes plus) and cover showing both models in multiple positions to get all their best features in. The scene that led me to this site is two models I know are pros: Jenna Fox and Kira Noir. They are in an office and have a Sybian up on the desk. This is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen. It is right at 40 minutes long and includes kissing, fingering, oral, anal play, sixty-nine, and they somehow still have the energy left to take turns riding the Sybian while the other touches and kisses them. It’s one of those scenes that can make a site. Which is the best part of the site, nearly all the scenes are at least close to as good as this one. I saw this one on a tube site and the link from it led me to join since it is one of the scenes with up to 4K.
I talk about this in another review from this network, they have little dots on the streaming scene’s timeline that tell you when the action changes. That one has Eating Pussy, Pussy Fingering, Sixty-Nine, Sybian easy to scan to spots in the scene. Those don’t show up on the downloaded version.
As much as I liked that scene, it ended up being only my 3rd or 4th favorite scene from the site. The one with Nicole Bexley and Priya Price is one of the “roughest” lesbian scenes I’ve seen and they are listed as a couple. That was my feeling when watching some of these scenes. There is a lot of chemistry and maybe even taking liberties, that I don’t know that a non-couple (in real life) would risk.
The other scene that made the membership worth the price features Sarah Banks and Jazzy Jamison. These are not names I recognize. The comfort-level between the women leads to most of my beliefs about a real relationship. There is pussy eating in this scene that I know real couples don’t even do. Deep licking, even nibbling with passionate kisses.
The site has 78 scenes, photos and screencaps with each and the downloads are unlimited according to the join page which invites new members to download their whole collection. I still don’t know enough about technology to understand the 60 frames per second tag, but most of the scenes on this site has it.
My favorite part of all the scenes on this site is the way they use foreplay in each of the scenes. A hand up the skirt rubbing over the panties is sexy to me. Especially when the rest of the clothes just start coming off naturally. It’s too bad the site isn’t updating anymore. This seems to be a underused niche in the lesbian genre. |
|
12-08-21 07:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Puffy Network
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The network has almost 2200 scenes and 900 models.
Most updates available in 4K for no extra charge.
Has links to get other discounts.
Excellent quality videos, but poor photosets.
There are no download limits.
I think there are more tags for searching than anybody has anywhere. |
| Cons: |
The models are not always attractive with not much variety in body type or ethnically.
The models don’t talk so it is hard to get to know them. |
| Bottom Line: |
It is a tradition that men join porn sites more than women and the content you commonly find is mostly what men like. While there are many things I liked about this network, it is aimed more at men than women. Let’s just start with the name. When women think about getting puffy, it means uncomfortable and wishing it was over. Here puffy refers to the site Wet and Puffy, where pussy pumps make them bigger and more prominent. I have no interest in that. I watch porn to see women in action that I can identify with and go along with the fantasy of it being me. It is not so much to stare at outsized pussies. Maybe outsized hard cocks might work for me, but they are not to be found on this network. Even then, I want to see them being used, not just to look at.
Besides the pussy pump being something I have never seen before, another is the pussypedia classifications for the three types of pussy. One is Puffy Peach, another Big Taco and the last is Big Cherry. These labels refer to the relative sizes of the inner and outer labia. While interesting, I can’t honestly say I care that much.
The tag system is confusing. If you search using “pissing” you get 315 videos. If you look under “peeing” you get 123. You may well ask how could this be? They have too many tags, a true double edged sword. While having many of them is a great idea and you can use the tags with precision, having too many creates chaos. To compound it all they have an advanced search to further refine your efforts. I saw one video that had yes, it is true, well over 50 tags.
These are the five sites in the network:
Simply Anal - 160 updates and not just anal. Women having anal with both men and women. Not only anal, but oral and vaginal. Cumshots can be anywhere.
Eurobabes Facials - 44 scenes and no longer updating.
We Like to Suck - about 400 videos and not just blowjobs. About 300 videos include ball sucking, for me a big plus.
Wet and Pissy - almost 550 videos. Masturbation with objects, as well as pissing.
Wet and Puffy over 1000 videos. Masturbation with objects.
The women are mostly from Eastern Europe and don’t talk. They look to be about 18 to 30 and some are well known stars, for example Lady Dee and Gina Gerson. I am no expert on famous stars, but these two are on nearly every site from Eastern Europe. For the most part the models are just doing what they are told to do and not how they feel. I found them to be just mechanical and not easy to identify with. I like to see myself as in the scene with them, but that rarely happens here.
The site advertises that all the scenes are exclusive and you get a large enough archive with nearly 2200 video updates and poor quality photo sets. Recently the network has been adding five updates a week, which is not bad at all. Most videos can be downloaded in quality as high as 4K and there is no extra charge for it like you see on some other sites. They have smaller sizes, including ones for cell phones.
There are a few other more minor criticisms. One is that the user name and passwords are randomly generated and make no sense. When you first sign up there are boxes that are already checked to join other sites. I was looking on the opposite side of the page and almost did not see I had to uncheck the boxes. However, if you are interested in other sites, they have seven pages with links for discounts. Right now there is a sale price of $7.95 a month as an early Black Friday special. |
|
11-10-21 12:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
MILF Thing
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A MILF site that I believe has unlimited potential – if they can keep it going.
There are currently 70 scenes and it’s a tale of three eras. I haven’t seen a site that needs to get a push behind it more than this one.
There was a new update last week, the previous update was last year, the newest 13 scenes all have 4K and show the unlimited potential.
Dirty, hardcore, kinky, and exactly what I expect from a real Milf aged woman faced with hard dicks.
While the overall quality is not great, it is better than expected with more than half of the scenes having at least 720p and 1080p, and 13 having 4K. There are also downloadable pictures and screenshots.
A site that other “Milf” sites should look to for reference on what is Milf aged pornstars. |
| Cons: |
A tale of three eras. This site has scenes from 2007 – 2021 and there’s only 70 scenes. If you can get past that, you’re in for a real treat.
The older scenes do only have 540p download option, but the scenes are encoded well and are watchable.
No idea when they’re going to update. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like the Milf niche of porn, and usually find myself torn on whether that should be generational or if it should be biologically accurate. Biologically accurate would say a Milf, in porn, could be as young as 18. I prefer the generational usage of it pertaining to women in their 30s, maybe 40s, who are more experienced and that’s what this site nails. I don’t know these models. Some may not be in their 30s or 40s, but their sexual actions say they are very experienced. That’s what I like in Milf porn.
The tale of three eras: It looks like this site started out well-before the popularity of Milf porn started. Of their 70 scenes, 57 were released in 2007 and 2008. I don’t know when Milf porn became popular, but I wasn’t watching much porn in 2007 or 2008 and only started noticing an overflow of Milf porn sites over the last 6-7 years. The good thing about those 2007-2008 scenes is 35 of those 57 have 720p and 1080p download options on the videos. You’re not getting a big drop in quality despite the 15 years of scenes. The newest 13 scenes have from mobile up to 720p, 1080p and 4K, which shows they have at least started to film some newer scenes.
My descriptions of what makes this site so good at what it does (Milf), won’t be appealing to all porn fans, but it will be to those who like Milf porn the way I do. There are some implants, there are some tattoos, there are some models that look like they got their makeup done at the local beauty school. There’s what I’m going to regrettably call a little bit of trashiness to the models. Please, keep in mind, I do not consider trashiness to be a bad thing. Especially in these type of scenes. The Milf is riding one guy and another guy walks in, she spreads her butt cheeks to give him a hole too. This is what regular, I’m going to say, American Milf porn fails at. This is hardcore, it’s a Milf cutting loose, giving a double blowjob, getting double penetrated and loving every minute of it.
You can say the newer scenes cause some disappointment. It looks like they are really excelling in this niche on those newer scenes, but you’re not going to get many new scenes unless they decide to start shooting more. Which I would start a petition for. I don’t like rough scenes – usually. But these give a different perception. These women perform like this is exactly what they want. They want two guys, one pulling her hair, one putting her in the wrestling type hold called the anal nelson. They do not wince, they don’t whimper, they have no problem at all taking any and everything these guys give them.
The newest scene alone is so good I would pay the price just for it. It has a woman I’ve never heard named Dominica Fonix (spelled Phoenix in another part of the site) and for 56 minutes, she wears two men out by herself. It looks like her sexual peak, peaked and it all came out in this one scene. There are other very good scenes on this site as well. How many times do you see a woman having a threesome with two men doing all this at the same time, she’s sucking one guy, rubbing his balls too, a dick in her pussy, while using her other hand to rub her clit? That’s a Milf! I do think I have to be realistic with the score just because at the current update rate there may not be another scene, but if you’re into Milfs that fit the Milf generational category, who are at their sexual peak and can take anything sexual thrown at them while looking pretty AND a little trashy/slutty, you owe it to yourself to check this site out. |
|
08-31-21 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Massage Parlor
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A welcome change to the formulaic world of massage porn even if the site is dead.
There are 314 scenes each with a downloadable video.
Very little intercourse, but more than a handjob/blowjob. It’s a middle ground of what massage porn usually gives us.
Simple to use site.
Very good video quality, considering the site hasn’t updated in years, makes it an easy site to skip, but you shouldn’t.
Includes photo sets with 100+ pictures and those are downloadable.
Most male and female models are attractive. |
| Cons: |
I’m going to list the no longer updating as a con, but it’s a large site for what looks like a non-standard niche in the massage genre.
There could be more navigation options and tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
The most common massage sites appeal to me. I like the use of oils, the massaging, the hand movements and what I see as erotic foreplay. The problem I have found with most massage sites is that the massages are usually just lead-ins for a handjob/blowjob scene or a standard hardcore scene. I believe it’s one of the embedded into, ingrained if you will, failures of porn over the last 5-10 years. That’s why I appreciate this site and hate that it has stopped updating.
The scenes start off like any massage scene. The masseuse is almost always the female except in a few of the scenes. There are some scenes with more than a masseuse and a customer, working in the angle of “she’s training” to add a second female. The massage doesn’t jump from first touch leads to sex. Some of the scenes have nearly half of the scene focused on the massage. There’s an added playfulness in the scenes with more than one female. As the male customer -- lying face down -- is unaware of the two female masseuses touching each other and taking their clothes off. Where the site excels is only a few of the scenes turn into hardcore sex. Most of the scenes instead of the female masseuse giving the male a handjob or blowjob, shows the masseuse climbing on top of the man in a 69. That is not something I am used to seeing in massage scenes. It, to me, adds a touch of eroticism. If you have problems with fantasizing, I think these scenes help with that. They’re not having noisy sex which usually ruins massage scenes for me. Maybe the 69 is the great mystery solver to stop the overacting and excessive chatter from the models? Both the male and female have their mouths either full or their tongues active. I really like this content and would like to see more of this style of massage porn.
There are 315 scenes so all is not lost. Of those 315 scenes, each has a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. All 315 videos have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads, even the oldest ones.
With the site’s easy to use navigation, though I will complain that there needs to be better tagging, the site is still one of those that is easy to look over due to it not updating. The attractiveness and decent acting ability of the models make the scenes even more enjoyable. These scenes do work in a little story. It usually happens within the first few minutes of the scenes and has to do with the male customer calling someone, talking about how stressed out they are and how much the massage is needed. It’s not anything too deep, but it is enough. I definitely recommend it for those who want to see a massage scene that is more sexual than a handjob (usually CFNM when in massage), but doesn’t go all the way to hardcore. |
|
08-09-21 03:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Mommy's Girl
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Interesting, story (cliched) driven lesbian younger/older porn
495 scenes with video, photo sets and depending on your membership, they can be downloaded.
This is one of those sites that makes me wonder about how bi-curious I am. The models, both younger and older ones, are all very attractive women.
If you have the download subscription you can download in 4K (newer scenes), 1080p, 720p, 540p and multiple mobile or smaller versions.
Comes with the whole Adult Time network, but easily stands on its own. I even believe sites like this one get lost on Adult Time.
Production makes these scenes better than they probably are. The stories are believable enough, the acting is good enough and the sex is believable.
Updates weekly. |
| Cons: |
Adult Time's navigation makes all of their sites difficult for me. There's too many filters and covered eyes, open eyes.
Where there are porn stars there will be overacting, and just generally poor acting, it is a problem in some of these scenes.
Had 7 days where my download speed was below 1 MB/s. I usually am in the 30 MB/s range. I believe that's the high cost of being such a big, popular network. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian porn either really works for me or I hate it. I admit there's no middle ground with me when it comes to lesbian porn. I think I have shown in the past that I have an interest in older/younger, it can be straight, bi, lesbian or gay. I believe it is because the older actors and actresses are more believable. You can see a genuine excitement in the older actor or actress when the perky, nude 20 year old, is presented to them on a platter. You also get more of a believable feeling, especially with older/younger lesbian porn, from the younger women not being near as experienced.
I have talked about my frustration with Adult Time before. My favorite porn site, the one that first sparked my interest in porn was Vivid's site. Adult Time has made Vivid nearly unusable for me. This site doesn't have that problem which is my more positive side towards Adult Time. You can find anything you're looking for on the site either by just scrolling through or if you know the model's name, entering it. Their search system works well for what I am going to call lesser-established sites like Mommy's Girl. You can even search from the main page for Mommy and the site pops up as one of the selections. Whereas, if you are on Vivid on Adult Time and enter a name of a DVD you are looking for you may get 3 of the scenes from it pop up, but not the full DVD itself. Meaning, you have to go hunt the scenes that aren't coming up in the search. I do think this site could improve the tagging system. They could do that by removing the obvious ones. It's a lesbian site. Why does it need a "lesbian" tag? Or a "pussy licking" tag? The site is cluttered enough as it is.
I only join Adult Time with the download option. One of the other Porn Users members was picking on me about buying a 4K monitor, but not downloading the 4K files. Which is why my 3rd con was listed. I had a week of very slow downloads on this site. There was no way I could download the 4K versions. They have 1080p, 720p and 480p, plus 540p and several smaller ones available. I have figured out the 1080p, 720p, 480p are the same aspect ratio. That's what I am looking for from sites.
The scenes each have a story and it's usually cliche, but I do think the combination of attractiveness of the models and their ability to do a decent job of acting, makes the site very good. I would say it's one of the better lesbian sites. Which is why I either really like lesbian porn or hate it. Convincing me these women really are turning lesbian and it's not just a porn scene is just wasting their time and mine too. Let it be two or four women just enjoying their 30 minutes of lust. Which this site does a good job on. Maybe the niche of mommy/stepmom causes them not to play to the "these are real lesbians" problems most lesbian sites have? There is a large amount of content with nearly 500 scenes, they have weekly updates and that's to me, bigger than a lot of standalone sites I have joined. I can see why Adult Time is better as a year subscription. I spent 3 weeks just on this site and the Girlsway network.
You should look into this site if you have an Adult Time subscription, it's a really impressive site with enjoyable and long scenes. |
|
06-08-21 10:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A different take on the Milf niche than I am used to and I like it.
Nearly 350 models with some being completely new amateurs and some being established porn stars.
Impressive variety of models (age, body types, what they are willing to do)
Each model has at least one video series that totals 80-120 minutes and 200-500 photos. They add a new model or returning model once per week.
Site navigation is confusing at first, but gets easier to use and understand. The navigation then becomes a pro for the site.
Uses reputable billers, it gave me the choice of CCBill or Epoch. I prefer Epoch and chose it.
Very professional feeling with just enough amateur touch and the added variety to keep it from being samey from model to model. |
| Cons: |
Downloading the videos was a big problem for me during my first week of membership, but I then figured it out. This site and their other site FTV Girls handles downloading videos differently than any site I have been a member of.
The porn star scenes are not as enjoyable to me.
If you plan to download the 4K versions of the newer videos you better have a very fast download speed.
Filenames could be better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been interested in joining this site and their other site FTV Girls for awhile now, but I keep forgetting about them. The scenes are to me similar to if you met a model, talked to her, helped her find and explore her fetishes while videoing her and taking very pretty pictures of her. There’s a personal side to each scene you don’t get on most porn sites.
My thoughts on the different models can be explained without too much trouble. They do defy the laws of what is a MILF. Some of these models are in their 20s. I know it has been a discussion here before. While MILF could be even an 18 year old -- in porn, MILF content does seem to be more in the 30 to 50 year old models. There is also the possibility of some of the models looking a lot younger than they are. You will see that with several on this site.
The scenes like to bring in some forms of exhibitionism in the beginning. I have read that it has been tamed down over the years, but to me any form of exhibitionism is a big deal. If it’s a flash, if it’s masturbation, and it’s in public that is a big deal. Like most women and some guys, I enjoy exhibitionism. There are sections in the videos where the cameraman talks to the model and it’s not the same redundant questions you usually get in porn.
The videos, I noticed a complaint posted on the FTV Girls videos recently, but I don’t know the technical terms. I think the videos look great, they have pretty scenery when outdoors and the indoor parts are clear with plenty of close-ups. I kind of was expecting more softcore. I was correlating softcore with exhibitionism, but these scenes all have masturbation that is as graphic and even extreme as I have seen. There’s nothing disgusting or ripping the woman open with a massive dildo, but I am seeing more real orgasms on this site than on most sites. The pictures are similar to the videos in terms of pretty scenery, colors and vibrance.
You can download the videos and photo sets. The problem I had with downloading the videos in case anyone else runs into this. When you click on a scene it opens the video and there is the download link for the video. I was not realizing each video has multiple parts. I was just downloading the 1st video. Which also led to me thinking this is a very softcore site. I could see how that would bother some people. The file names could be better to work with having to download multiple videos to piece together a full scene. I did read over the more experienced reviews of this site and FTV Girls and now can see what has been said. There is clearly a separation in the scenes into parts so you can just download the parts of the video you want to see. If you don’t like the interviewing/talking part, you can skip downloading that. If you don’t like masturbation, you can skip it. If you don’t like exhibitionism you can skip that part. The reason I can see this being useful is from my cons. The 4K videos from this site are very large. The most current update has 14 parts to the video. If you downloaded all 14 parts in 4K the scene would be around 15GB total. That’s just too much for me for one full video and being able to choose which parts you want to download gives you the chance to pare that size down.
One of the parts I am most impressed with is the model variety. These look like almost all American models and they come in different sizes (most are average or slimmer), some with large boobs, others with smaller boobs, blondes, brunettes, redheads, black women, Indian woman, Latinas and the ages look to go from 25 to around 50.
They are updating once a week and the update is bigger than a usual update since it includes 80-120 minutes of video and 250-500 photos of the model being featured that week. There are a few lesbian scenes and a few male with female scenes, but I didn’t even watch those since I take this site -- as said, as a personal experience of getting to know the one model.
I am very impressed overall and will be a returning customer to this site and FTV Girls too. |
|
04-11-21 10:55pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
47
|
Submissed
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Eight, kinky, bondage, dominance, submissive and sadomasochism sites rolled into one network.
The newest site, Pegging 4K, got my attention and made me join.
Newer scenes have 4K
807 scenes with 2 new updates per week.
Scenes have improved a lot since their older content especially in length.
I think this is the highest video quality you will find in this genre. |
| Cons: |
The oldest scenes are almost all from the site Struggling Babes and most of those are 5 minutes or less.
Most of the scenes with bondage involved start after the submissive one is in the bondage. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink is my favorite network or site and this Submissed one can be looked at as a good alternative especially if you are into higher resolution videos. While Kink only has their scenes available in up to 720p resolution, Submissed has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on their newer scenes. The oldest scenes on Submissed still have 720p, so they have a lot of content that is equal to Kink in terms of video quality.
Pegging 4K talked me into joining. I had a membership here a few years ago. There are only 10 scenes on Pegging 4K currently, but the rest of the network makes up for it. I don’t think the Pegging 4K is quite up to par with Divine Bitches, where you at least get to see the pegged guy get to have sex with the female after he’s pegged, but maybe they will start working that into the scenes.
The sites included are: Pegging 4K, Struggling Babes, Ball Gagger, Bound Men Wanked, Femdum, Hogtied Up, Machine Dom and Sub Amateur. The network updates regularly with 2 updates per week, but all of the sites are not updating. I originally joined it a few years ago for the Bound Men Wanked content which Kink has a few licensed scenes from. I find it to be one of the most erotic handjob/female dominance sites I have been a member of, however, it is not one of the sites that is still updating.
There are 807 scenes, these each come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
I do believe this site is more accessible to the average porn user than Kink is. There’s not much English so you don’t hear as much degradation, most of the sites even with very hardcore premises are tamer than expected and the women almost always give in when in the dom role. That is what separates accessible from inaccessible in my opinion. Even with the backdrop of BDSM, the man gets off and the woman usually does too.
It’s worth a join if you’re into BDSM. The scenes could be longer, but they have been improving that. You also get the higher resolution videos compared to Kink. The navigation has a menu box you can select any of the sites in the network from and go directly to them. It’s a very good network that could use some improvement in the production and storylines. |
|
10-06-20 12:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
48
|
Girl Cum
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredibly hot messy female orgasm site.
There are 66 models, some have multiple scenes.
69 scenes, probably the only time I will ever get to say that number in a review with two updates per month.
Reading all the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. I will leave it at that.
Video and photo quality is exceptional and are available in unlimited downloads.
Easy to cancel and navigate except for a few bugs |
| Cons: |
If you go to the model list it will show you 24 models, if you click to go to the next page it shows you the same 24 models as page 1 and if you click on page 3 it shows you the same 24 models from page 1. The dropdown box does work for finding all the models.
Upsells are everywhere. They also show you scenes from sites you don’t have access to.
Maybe it fits better in cons, reading the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. |
| Bottom Line: |
I probably need to clarify my pro/con jabbing at the male reviewers for saying the female cum in these scenes is fake. It may be in some of the scenes, but from the looks of the scenes they are editing and cutting parts throughout the scenes. I am not -- as a woman, going to say the female cum is fake. It takes a very relaxed and aroused woman to produce a messy orgasm like is seen in these scenes. Some sex toys like the Magic Wand Plus are known, especially in edging a female, to cause very messy orgasms. What I notice is the women are usually very wet and starting to show messiness near the beginning of the scenes. That makes me think they are being prepped prior to the sex starting. There also is a lot of male giving the female oral sex before the intercourse starts. I am not trying to be hard on the male reviewers, but I can say women can cum that much. I am also not insinuating they are just not taking the females they have been with to that level. As I started this, I said the female needs to be very relaxed and aroused. A lot of women are insecure about showing that much sexual energy. Either way, I really love this site and hope it will update more once the pandemic is over.
This is a site that doesn’t really need stories or plots. It’s about the female’s pleasure. Which is different from 99% of straight porn out there. The models are all professionals. They are mostly young, though a few MILF models are present and they are believably horny. Despite little to no story there are scenes with extended setups like public masturbation and flashing before the scene starts. Which would also lend to the female being aroused before the guy even touches her. Is it really that hard for guys to believe a woman could get even more aroused about sex than a man does?
The site could be bigger though I picked the right time to review this since there are 69 scenes. I don’t think you will see many 69s, at least not in my memory of the scenes I have watched. With only 2 updates per month it will take a long time for this site to have a lot of scenes, but hopefully, they will stick to the current style or formula instead of making it less erotic just to produce more scenes. I will say there isn’t one scene I plan on skipping over.
The download options are another major positive. Each of the 69 scenes can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The pictures are not as impressive at 1500x1000 and the downloadable sets only have 30-50 pictures in them with most of them being taken during the sex parts.
The only thing I can find to complain about is the size of the site, but in my few years of experience of porn viewing and collecting, I usually look at a site’s size by how many scenes I want to download, not by how many scenes they have. Most sites I join, even ones with thousands of scenes, only have 50-100 scenes I download. This one has 69.
Highly recommended. |
|
09-28-20 10:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Overwhelmingly large lesbian site that has content from as far back as 2003.
Over 1,000 models.
1,816 scenes with new updates being posted every 3 days.
Each scene includes downloadable photos and videos.
Advanced search allows the user to filter multiple tags.
Very attractive models, could possibly be a con.
Good price for all the content you get access to. |
| Cons: |
There is a professional feel to everything. The models are nearly all Europeans and the porn feels that way.
The advanced search will likely confuse just as many people as help them.
Consistency is not always a good trait. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my first time joining this site. While I am open to lesbian content, it is not my favorite and I have to be in the mood for it. This site is a good example of that. I won't deny the quality of the content or the beauty of the models, but some of the content feels forced, scripted and the newer scenes do not offer much variety. The professional feeling is a con to me. Everything looks like a porn set. This automatically loses me a little bit. You can even use the advanced search to see the actions used in each scene go in phases. It's like they pick up on what's popular and use it in every scene until it's no longer popular then they find something new to add.
That is more my subjective opinion. I have been using lesbian sites like Girls Out West which is on the other end of the spectrum. Some of the scenes here are outstanding. It does seem to matter who the models are. Which offers some inconsistency, but the production is highly consistent. I would like to see more action letting the women work within the scene without so much direction.
From an objective view there isn't much wrong. They list 1,000 models, but it looks like more than that to me as one page says, "Our latest 1,000 models". They have a little of everything too. See a short list of what all different actions they have in their scenes.
374 scenes with 69.
298 scenes with at least 3 girls.
57 scenes with fisting.
95 scenes with tribbing (I don't agree with their number on that one, it seems much higher)
74 scenes with strap-on dildos.
The video quality is very good, they have 1080p downloads available on some scenes from 2004 and 2005. Starting in 2006-07, all videos have 1080p and for the last year or two they added 4K. Many attractive models, high quality video downloads, photos for the photo lovers and still updating during the Covid-19 pandemic. I think the only real faults with it are if you're into amateur action, scenes that make you believe the actresses are into it the lesbian sex, or if you want any kind of story or setup, you may be a little disappointed. The site does do an excellent job of capturing the action on camera (professional) and showcases the models' bodies. |
|
09-08-20 10:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An eleven site ladyboy network with I think broad appeal
Over 1,000 models
Over 3,000 videos and newer videos have 4K option
Over 3,000 photo sets with zip downloads
Very good navigation via model search, latest updates or categories. You can also search by site.
Scenes seem genuine, the “straight” males in the scenes seem surprised, but also don’t push the pretty ladyboys away. |
| Cons: |
Very little story other than whatever the specific site’s niche is.
Camerawork could be better at times. Showing someone’s face while they orgasm kind of ruins the point of showing whatever happened before the orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have always been intrigued by transsexuals and more specifically ladyboys. Being from India, I knew a few ladyboys and there was an unexplainable attraction to them.
Which was one disappointment for me. For some reason, I thought this network had a lot of scenes with ladyboys having sex with women, but it only has 10. It does have nearly 200 solo scenes which returns to my fetish of seeing “men” masturbating. I think that number might be low as I have seen several solo scenes not marked as solo.
I don’t consider myself close to an expert on ladyboys or transsexuals, but my understanding and my eyes tell me a ladyboy is usually of smaller frame, most look to be Asian and most look very feminine. That is why I think the ladyboy niche could have a broader appeal. I know a lot of straight guys would say they’re not interested, but some of these ladyboys might change your view.
From a professional view, I have studied about the men born with the XXY chromosome or the Klinefelter Syndrome. I think it would be interesting if these transsexual and ladyboy sites discussed that more. As some of these “men” are born more dispositioned to be females than males even if they have a dick.
That is what you see a lot of on Ladyboy Gold. A lot of these models would never pass as a male. The solo scenes give us a different perspective of a dick being masturbated since these models are more feminine, you see more hip movement, more what I would call sexual movements and I find it very attractive.
The network is large with over 3,000 videos and 3,000 photo sets. It goes back to 2007. They update 5 days a week and some, not all, of the updates have up to 4K video.
The sites you receive with the network are: Ladyboys Fucked Bareback, LB Girlfriends, Ladyboy Crush, TSRaw, Ladyboy Vice, Ladyboy Dildo, Ladyboy Obsession, Ladyboy Wank, Ladyboy Angel and Ladyboy Glamour with Ladyboy Gold being the hub and main site.
I am most impressed with the passion you see in these scenes. You won’t see models looking bored or just wanting the scene to end. They look like they are very much into the scenes. For the females into cumshots, it’s one of the best parts since the scenes with a male with the ladyboy both cum and I think it also could appeal to bi-curious women since you are going to see boobs, feminine bodies, but with a dick.
I do think it takes longer than a month with this network. I knew zero of these models and find myself a little overwhelmed at times. The scenes I found most interesting were the orgy/gangbangs. I was hoping to see more of those with women included. It would make you wonder if the male was going to get off more with the anal with the ladyboy or the vaginal with the woman. I have really enjoyed this network especially with the easy navigation and no ads. |
|
07-15-20 04:15am
Replies (1)
|
|
