| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
XFeeds
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I joined through Doc Squirt, but believe this is the network’s main site. I will try explaining it since it’s confusing. As a full network it has some good content.
Currently shows 8 updates over the last 7 days.
The model list only works for the entire network and there are 170 models.
If you select the alternate biller link it is CCBill
Poor navigation won’t allow an accurate count on scenes, but from what I’m piecing together there are around 400 scenes total with most having 4K video option.
Videos are downloadable, I wondered since the name “feeds”, but they are downloadable and I see nothing about limits.
Some improving (though cliche) stories in the newer scenes. Some scenes have subtitles, others do not. |
| Cons: |
The navigation will have you going in circles. If you go to “latest” it brings up a scene that was posted 1 week ago. If you go to the Xfeeds link it says 8 scenes have been released in the last week.
The main screen shows the 9 newest scenes. To get to the older ones you have to jump from site link to site link and even then you don’t know if you’re seeing everything. The category search which has 7 generic options at least is one way to get to the majority of the scenes.
For some reason the site logs me out anytime I close the page even if I click “remember me”. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first joined this network through Doc Squirt, I started to realize the XFeed.net site was the main site. I can’t say in what experience I have with porn sites, I have been on a porn site with navigation like this one. They list having Doc Squirt, Slim4K, MyTinyWish and DudCast. But some of the newer scenes start off with the name “My Dirty Novels”. Those are the improved scenes. Yet, there’s no link to go to for just the My Dirty Novels scenes.
The problem with the navigation includes con #2, going to any of the listed sites separately, including Xfeed.net, only shows you 9 scenes. Doc Squirt and DudCast have a “see more” button to see all of their scenes. But if you put the scenes together for Doc Squirt, DudCast, MyTinyWish it’s not even 75 total. Those 3 show all their scenes. The other around 300-400 scenes are found by going through the categories. Those categories with their number of scenes for those interested are:
Squirt with 27 scenes, Creampie with 62 scenes, Anal in 206 scenes, Threesome in 69 scenes, DP with 22 scenes, Hardcore with 249 and Cumshots with 389. That is the only plainly clear way to find the scenes as far as I can tell.
They do offer 4K, 1080p and 720p on nearly all of their videos except the Doc Squirt ones -- those top out at 1080p.
There are subtitles on the Dudcast scenes, but I haven’t seen any subtitles on the other scenes. It would seem like those would be most useful in the My Dirty Novels scenes since there is a story. Instead, the story is just listed in the scene description. There are pretty and cute models in nearly every scene. And if their update schedule is true, they are updating more than nearly all sites I have been on lately, but the navigation is going to make it frustrating for most to use and the inconsistencies from site to site makes it even more frustrating. When you use the categories search you don’t know which of their sites the scene is from so if you wanted subtitles, you have no way to know until you either stream or download it.
It’s a decent choice (for the price) if you are into hardcore sex with teens. Those newest scenes are trying to bring an edgier feel to the scenes with swinger type scenarios. One of the newest scenes is my favorite scene I watched, the name of it isn’t the best translation, “Shy cutie tries sex with a couple.” A shy young woman would hop into bed with a couple? There’s just some confusion, possibly bad translations (including in the subtitles) and all those navigation problems are stopping it from being a better network. |
|
02-09-21 07:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
177
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A surprising site that reminds me of what would happen if Pure Taboo was toned down some.
Only 67 scenes, but most of them are worth downloading.
Multiple “taboos” explored including stepfamily, crazy girlfriend and big dick cravings.
Scenes come with a video and photo set. All can be downloaded and it’s unlimited.
CCBill is the biller.
Comes with Nubile Films so it’s a good buy when added to Nubile Films. |
| Cons: |
The next surprise, they aren’t updating it anymore.
Would have liked to see other taboos like older/younger. |
| Bottom Line: |
They do a good job of making a lighter, more accessible version of Pure Taboo. The crazy girlfriend ones are the best on here since we know there’s no such thing as crazy boyfriends. They do lean a little too heavily on cliches. One of the crazy girlfriends is going to burn down the boyfriend’s house since he hasn’t texted or called her. She forgives him within a few minutes. He tells her they can start over. She (cliche) asks if they can start a family. They have sex and he pulls out for the cumshot on her belly. She flips the crazy switch since she wanted the cum in her and starts scraping the cum into a bottle. It’s very light-hearted compared to other sites I have seen. The stepfamily scenes are pretty good. They stick to the typical stories on those too like “lets try it!” It reminds me of Bollywood acting. Which is not a compliment. I sometimes wonder with sites like this one if anyone ever thought to do scenes about a crazy boyfriend or a crazy ex-boyfriend who happened to make a second copy of the girl’s house key and pays her a visit.
The scenes are fun. The girls are cute and young looking. They even seem like they are having fun with the stories. I do find porn more interesting when the models look like they’re enjoying themselves.
The video quality on downloads is 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. What doesn’t make any sense is they don’t have 4K videos, but the screen captures for these scenes are 3840x2160 which is 4K. If their screen captures are 4K why aren’t their videos?
I think you have to look at this site as a very nice addition to Nubile Films. I don’t know if they ran out of taboo ideas and decided to stop updating Hot Crazy Mess, but I have seen much worse porn that is still being updated.
I would join this site by itself. I like the taboo scenes even if they’re not that believably taboo and aren’t near as intense as sites like Pure Taboo. It only takes a little story to keep me interested and they do that here. If you try Nubile Films be sure to check out the content on this site too. I prefer this site’s content to the scenes on Nubile Films. I would like to know why they stopped updating it or if maybe they will restart it as part of Nubile Films. The variety is a welcome change. |
|
10-05-20 09:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
178
|
Tricky Masseur
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
have learned to never trust a masseuse again thanks to porn.
There are 229 scenes on the site, but they haven’t updated it since May 2020.
The newer videos have 4K, but 1080p is more of the high standard here.
Pretty, young girls (18-22), athletic guys.
It may be the one niche that has an automatic story built in.
Vendo is the billing processor. |
| Cons: |
This niche is repetitive even when done well.
Very inconsistent update schedule with 3 so far in 2020, 6 in 2019 and 4 in 2018, that mainly matters if you’re looking for 4K.
They could at least massage the woman before sticking their finger up her ass. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like massage porn. The best I have seen does become repetitive since there’s just not a lot you can do with the stories. I would rate this site in the middle or lower in comparison to other massage sites I have tried. There’s nothing that bad about it, but the inconsistency in updates combined with very little actual massaging makes it only okay as a massage site.
I have made it clear I like younger/older porn. Most masseuses I have met in real life are older. This site isn’t the only massage site that misses the opportunity to get in a second niche with an older male masseuse, but their masseuses on this site look like the jock next door. It’s just poor planning to me. If you go in a house with the jock next door, take your clothes off and lay on a bed, it’s not likely he’s going to be massaging you gently for very long. I feel like there has to be some sort of level of believability.
You get 229 scenes here. Around 30 of those have 4K downloads. The rest do have at least 720p and around half also have 1080p. There are “pictures” but they are really screenshots as you can see the subtitles on them. That is a feature I wish all their sites had. All of the scenes I have watched from this site have subtitles. They are basic subtitles that are sometimes funny. Not being a native English speaker, it’s hard for me to tell if it’s broken English, but they have made me laugh.
This looks like a site they had high hopes for. The girls are mostly young, pretty and flat to moderate chested. Which makes for good massage scenes. It adds to their naivety. An inconsistency I have noticed throughout this network is with the pictures. The pictures on this site can’t be downloaded in zips and almost seem pointless since they are taken directly from the video.
It’s a good site if you like massage porn, but haven’t watched much massage porn. The guys are not bad looking on this site, better than most of the sites on this network even, but they seem out of place. They look more like the pervert that’s peeking in while the masseuse is massaging the young women. It’s worth a look if you have a membership to the network. |
|
09-28-20 10:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
179
|
First BGG
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-threesome site featuring two girls and one guy.
The site has been around for 11 years which could be as much of a con as pro.
There are currently 127 scenes with only 1 update per month.
Site navigates well which is to be expected of a site this size.
Newer videos include 4K.
Vendo is the billing processor and they are as easy to use as any biller, maybe easier if you have multiple memberships with them they all show up. |
| Cons: |
Eleven years as a site and it only has 127 scenes. If this site fits a niche you like you will be pleased with the selection, but you won’t get much new content once you download what you want.
It just seems like this studio doesn’t believe in filming any scenes with substantial length to them. Even with a third person added the scenes average 20-30 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
You get the picture with the title of the site. There’s going to be two girls and a boy in each scene. These are not your wilder threesomes. Some of the scenes do have the guy with one of the girls while the other girl sits on the other’s face, but a lot of just looks like two different girls taking turns with the guy. The scenes do feature a lot of double blowjob action if that interests you. I’m not really for sure what they are going for here since I see the word “passionate” a lot, but the actions don’t show that. These scenes are not bad, they just aren’t great. When you see the two girls in the scenes a lot of times you are going to think it’s going to be great. The guy is mostly a clod. He just lays there and lets the two girls take turns doing their positions with him.
You only have 127 scenes here with 1 new one added per month. That has been common for them for the 11 years they have had this site, as they average just a little over 11 scenes per year. I do prefer the American sites that do this same exact niche since you get more dialogue and longer scenes. Some of the scenes feel terribly rushed. The girls are cute in looks to very pretty. The guys are a hit or miss bunch with more misses than hits. They could do better with male model selection.
The newer videos have up to 4K unlimited downloads and streaming. They also offer the standards 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p. The photos can be downloaded in zips. The con side of being an 11 year old site is the oldest videos are 720p max. Those also have 480p and 360p. I don’t mind 720p and often download that resolution, but it could be a problem for others. It seems to be a double whammy here since the site isn’t that big and the older content doesn’t even have 1080p or 4K.
However, I will say I like this site’s scenes better than the one on one sites I have seen on this network. Maybe it’s just the thought that more could happen even if it doesn’t?
I don’t think this site is enough reason to join the network, but when you combine it with the value of the other sites the network comes with it makes this site one of the better ones on the network just because it’s a little different and changes up their formulaic approach their other sites use so much. |
|
09-28-20 09:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
180
|
Panty Pops
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very fetish-related content, but does deviate from the fetish.
There are 145 scenes.
Beautiful models that fit the fetish with mostly plump butts.
POV-filmed and I think this fetish has to be.
Should interest panty lovers, leg lovers and some scenes stick with that fetish.
Newer videos have up to 1080p, but make note of the first con. |
| Cons: |
If you are really into this fetish the older scenes stick with the fetish, but their highest quality download is 480p. It looks like the site was maybe sold and taken into a different direction.
Some of the scenes don't even go into the fetish of the site. They are good sex scenes, but I would like to see more of the fetish.
No longer updating. |
| Bottom Line: |
A Panty Pop fetish is unique since it combines multiple genres of porn. Panty Pops include the female wearing a pretty pair of panties, bending over in front of the camera, taking the guy's dick and rubbing it against her panties. The progression adds sticking the dick inside the panties with the pussy rubbing against the dick or rubbing the dick between the panty covered butt crack. The pop is the finale of the cum shot. In the truest sense of the fetish the panties never come off.
In the newer scenes on this site the panties are off very early in most of the scenes. It just becomes a regular POV hardcore sex scene with no fetish involved. The older scenes do the fetish as well as any site. The combination of genres includes handjobs, panties, cum on clothes (panties). When done properly, it is a very erotic handjob. I don't know enough about when the site was sold, but the earliest scenes are from 2007. The newest are 2018. You can watch the older scenes and tell a distinct difference in them and the newer scenes. It looks like tease was a big deal in 2007, but not in 2018.
The does hurt the site a little since the ones sticking to the fetish top out at 480p quality. I don't see that as a major damning point, but it is too bad they haven't remastered those old scenes. The style of the scenes also changes the length. The earlier scenes are shorter with most of them being under 10 minutes, while the newer ones that stray from the fetish are often in the 20 plus minute range. I find that interesting. When the models were teasing the guys and being more creative then just having sex the guys finished faster.
The models are all professionals except possibly some of the first ones. I do not recognize the models from the older scenes. The newer ones include Liza Rowe, Ashley Fires, Harley Dean and Richelle Ryan. These scenes and fetish are made for the curvier bottom-half models. I may be a little critical of the newer scenes, but none of the newer scenes stay with the fetish. There are a few that use the fetish to begin with, but the scenes quickly turn into standard sex. It's an interesting fetish if you are new to it especially. The older scenes are where you should start. The models are not as pretty as the models in the newer ones, but you do get to see the fetish. |
|
09-08-20 10:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
181
|
Nanny Spy
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun, quasi-hidden cam (at beginning) porn.
All scenes have videos and photos to download
Many download options up to 4K
Porn Users has a discount, but I joined through the Porn Pros upgrade packed
40 excellent models |
| Cons: |
There are only 41 videos, but they are all exclusive
Only two updates since the Rabbits review last October.
Filenames make no sense. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nanny Spy is available by itself using a discount through Porn Users. I got an offer to sign up for the upgrade package from Porn Pros, when I joined there back in April.
Nanny Spy is one of those smaller but interesting sites with only 41 videos, so as a single standalone site I cannot recommend it. There is a photo set and a trailer for each. In spite of its small size, I found a lot to like about it.
The scenes appear to be shot in beautiful and expensive homes in the Los Angeles area. I lived there during my younger days, but did not live in homes like these. They have beautiful expensive furniture and such extras like outdoor and indoor jacuzzis. The families hire nannies and check up on them using spy cams.
The nannies are always up to doing something they should not be, like using the house for a cam show, getting caught watching porn or using the sex toys they discover and masturbating. The fun starts as the daddy, the man of the house, catches them and confronts them.
There is an age difference in the pairings. This could have been the focus, but for the most part it is not what you do see. There is concept of a power difference and its consequences. The nannies are willing to do “anything” once they are caught. The nannies seem to like paying a price for their misbehaving and very willingly enjoy the sex.
In the real life Los Angeles I knew, there was a lot more ethnic diversity than you see here. There is one Asian model and no Latinas. The models they have here are some of the best stars in the United States, both in looks and in how professionally they perform. There is nothing fake about them either. They do their scenes well. Riley Reid and Adriana Chechik are great here, but I expect that from them as they are two of the best in the business.
The effort that was put into the videos makes them work. The site though is not so well done. There are no scene descriptions, or tags and the file names are always the same. So you get for example mp4_1080 for every scene that you download in 1080p. If you want to know who or what is in the scene, you have to change all the file names. Another weakness is that the scenes do not show a date and only two have been added since the last Rabbit’s review in October, 2019. I suspect it has stopped updating.
I feel the site would have the potential to be in the 90’s if they had more updates. This is porn, so I am often disappointed when a good concept is left to remain undeveloped. |
|
08-12-20 12:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
182
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A big foot fetish site with an emphasis on regular foot fetish -- meaning the male and sometimes or female enjoy kissing, touching and licking her feet.
They have 618 scenes, each scene has a photo set and video. They add 1 new scene per week.
Includes access to Adult Time, it changes the original navigation and feel of the site, but works without any major differences or problems.
Someone at the site has a good, working knowledge of foot fetishism. There aren't a lot of male talents used on this site, but the ones that are seem to be real foot fetishists.
High production values for a fetish site. |
| Cons: |
General lack of reverse foot fetish content -- meaning the woman whose feet and legs are being licked, kissed and caressed is only aroused by being the one having it done to her. The women in the scenes seem to be as much into their feet as the men are.
Even as a reverse foot fetishist, I recognize the redundancy of a niche like this one.
I would be happier with it if they focused more on the legs and feet with clothing choices (hose, stockings and leggings) instead of having most of the newer scenes focusing on the bare feet and legs. |
| Bottom Line: |
Foot fetishists are viewed as strange. People generally believe a foot fetishist is someone that walks around with toes on their breath. A foot fetishist doesn't even have to include the feet. It can be the gait of a woman's walk that starts the attraction to her legs and on down, instead of on up.
The newer scenes are disappointing to me. They are shot from an already ready view. The woman is usually already out of her hose or stockings or leggings. A body part fetish -- in my opinion -- should focus on that body part and include what would be called "worship".
The worship here is relegated to kissing, licking, sucking on feet, legs and toes. Did they run out of fishnet stockings? Tight leggings that seduce the man from her ankles up to her knees and back down? It might sound like these are not legitimate negatives, but in a fetish of a body part, that body part should be the most wanted by the person fulfilling the fetish.
They do seem to put a lot of work, time and even money into the scenes, but they have also fallen into the "if ain't broke" mantra. I am sure there are foot fetishist that are happy with that. It just does not appeal as much to a reverse foot fetishist.
The producers of this site -- 21 Sextury -- also have the site 21 Foot Art. It has more content for reverse foot fetishists. This site is a good site for foot lovers. I have heard a lot of male foot fetishists love to see the woman alternate sucking on her own toes and the guy's penis. They feature that "position" in a lot of their scenes. I am surprised they don't have a category for it.
Four of the male actors are prominently featured on foot fetish sites -- Charlie Dean, Toby, Kristof Cale and Vince Carter. This is one niche that requires the male to do more than get it up, stick it in, last 20 minutes and give a good ejaculation. They have to be able to focus on the feet, legs and toes while doing all those other parts.
The female models are mostly very pretty, European and do at least enjoy having their feet kissed and licked. As someone that discovered their own interest in this niche, I sometimes wonder about he female model's enjoyment and real interest in the fetish. I am saying this is one time I would like to see the female models talk about which parts (toe licking/sucking, sole licking, entire leg licking) turns them on most, but their inability to speak English limits that interaction.
Minor improvements are needed, but most of those are subjective. It would rate a little higher if they relied more on clothes than shoes/strap sandals. It's a very good deal within an Adult Time membership. |
|
07-27-19 10:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
183
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The wonders of the incredibly elastic anus – showcased, for better or worse.
There are 711 scenes with updates being inconsistent.
While all of the females are not top-shelf in looks, most are at least attractive.
Seeing women be this rough and kinky with each other. The lesbian scenes were a surprise for me.
Most scenes go up to HD but less than 10 have 4K.
The solo scenes are just behind the lesbian scenes in quality. |
| Cons: |
Do not like the scenes with men. I really am straight. The scenes with men get too rough and Neanderthalic.
Okay, new one for me, there are scenes that not only list it, but have it in the title, “farting”. Not trying to pick on men, but one of those is a scene with a man in it. Neanderthalic. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had viewed a few scenes from this site before, but don’t think I realized how much it is a solo and lesbian site. There are 711 scenes, of those: 298 are listed as lesbian and 80 are listed as solo. I don’t know if it’s just the newer scenes have more emphasis on solo or lesbian and that’s what made me think this was just one of those males punish the female sites or not. Of the newest 60 scenes, only 7 have a man in them. There is a new update this month that has a man in it but would like this site a lot better if they stuck with the solo/lesbian theme.
This site is not for those that are turned off by rough sex or prolapse. I can’t say I like those parts. It does go into my feeling of removing the males. If a woman is masturbating anally and does prolapse or it is doing it rough, it is not so bad, it’s a little worse if it is lesbian and it just becomes unwatchable if it’s a man causing the prolapse. It’s nothing more than I see it as being rough for the sake of being rough. I don’t have problems with regular anal sex between a male and female, but the gimmick of this particular site is the stretching, the gaping and I would rather just see the woman doing that herself. I’m still waiting on that site where we see how far a woman can pull a man’s dick. That’s a fair comparison! It looks like these guys are competing to see which can cause the most destruction.
Some of the lesbian scenes are even erotic and passionate. That’s not what I was expecting. I have looked further back in the updates, and it does look like they changed the style from mostly men with women to solo and lesbian. I probably was a member when it was more of the men with women. I am not known to be turned away by hardcore sex.
The solo scenes remind me more of a woman just testing her ability and pain tolerance. That’s why I would recommend the lesbian scenes over those. The solo can feature large dildos, vegetables, fruits and seems to focus on the woman pushing her limits. The lesbian scenes are more showing of emotions and feelings. Maybe there is trust developed and that helps? It seems to be common for me on this network to only like specific niches within each site. I don’t find many that make me like everything or even 75%.
The video quality is very good. You get at worst 480p, but that is only on the oldest scenes which I wouldn’t recommend anyway. The majority of the scenes have HD (720p and/or 1080p) scenes. The photo sets are okay. I do think these are screen captures. Each set has near 200 in it and each is downloadable.
Lesbian scenes, solo, scenes with men. In that order and it’s a good site. |
|
01-12-22 08:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
184
|
Slave Mouth
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the best BDSM porn you can find.
Unusual, maybe unique focus on oral BDSM.
Highly creative exclusive content with an attention to detail that is amazing.
Great performances by BDSM professionals.
The site layout is easy to use with tags for easy searching
There is a trailer for reach scene as well as photos. |
| Cons: |
The site is updating slowly, only three so far this year.
There are only 45 videos online so far. Too expensive for the quantity, but they are high quality.
The downloads could be faster, but they are not a major problem.
If you want 4K videos, you have a different join price. You can’t just pay extra scene by scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are quite a few BDSM sites, but mostly they are not all that authentic. BDSM enthusiasts see their lifestyle as a choice, where both doms and subs make fantasies come true. Real BDSM is not mean spirited, on the contrary, it is role play by those who understand boundaries and limits. While it may look rough for those who participate, it is all about consent and power transfer. Dominance can make the scenes satisfying for the models in a way that ordinary sexual activity cannot. The site states "As lovers of BDSM and fetish activities ourselves, we know that even the most sadistic expression of sexual fantasy does not prevent people from being good human beings in everyday life."
If this is a new concept to you in your personal life, you just have to accept that these participants are often ordinary people who just think differently. As my friend says, it requires a suspension of disbelief. There is an interview both before and after. They talk about how the scene made them feel, how much fun it was, as well as how much they respect their partner. In the section of the site where potential models can learn about how they can get hired, they emphasize how much you have to be turned on by BDSM. Just doing this for a paycheck is discouraged. As a result, the scenes have an unrehearsed, genuinely sexy and in a way, fun feeling. A lot of mainstream porn is made factory style with the scenes basically being clones and the models interchangeable. This type of porn is 180 degrees the opposite.
Slave Mouth is a sister site of Assylum. Many of the same models are on both sites and you need a separate membership for each one. You can get a discount for joining both, but this is not an ordinary priced site or network. I believe you get what you pay for, for the most part, and that is true here. You get top level models, great production values and some truly intense, cleverly made scenes. The difference between Assylum and Slave Mouth is a focus on anal vs oral domination, but the lines between the two concepts are not firmly drawn. Assylum has plenty of oral and Slave Mouth includes some anal.
Some well known American BDSM models are on the site, like Charlotte Sartre and Rebel Rhyder. Some others I don’t recognize may be amateurs or exclusive to the site. The performances are near perfect and stick to the niche without any scenes that can be criticized as mere filler.
The oral can of course be forceful, rough face fucking, but can also include dildos and other objects being inserted orally. Sometimes there is gagging, sometimes their eyes water, sometimes they are choking for air, they cry. There is a lot of rimming on the dom by the sub, often repeatedly over and over. The models accept being pissed on and drink piss. They eat frozen cum in ice cube form. In a few scenes, their tongue is caned. Often their mouth is drilled while in suspension. Verbal dominance is a common theme, but it is not mean or cruel. I would never call these scenes misogynistic, but a relationship where both sides are willingly sharing an experience. But I should warn you that watching the scenes is not for the squeamish or those with firm boundaries as to what is hot and what is over the line. I would imagine those who like the content the most have joined other BDSM sites in the past.
The site uses Segpay, a very trusted biller, the members pages easy to understand and without advertising for outside sides. There is a trailer for each scene and there are photos too. The choices for downloads include very sharp, first class High Definition as well as 720 HD and 480SD. There are links for the two sister sites, Assylum and Dom the Nation and you can get discounts for adding either or both sites.
For me the real question is the balance of price vs. value. Assylum is bigger and is iconic with 234 updates. Slave Mouth has 45,has added three videos in 2021 and three in 2020.The price for each is the same, about $30. If you get both you are looking at about $50. The content on Assylum and on Slave Mouth is some of the best to be found for this niche and am happy I signed up for both. The previews are quite complete so it is useful to check them out and see for yourself. |
|
10-28-21 07:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
185
|
Love Wetting
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The video download options include 4K
Many beautiful and major name Czech pornstars are on the site and are in multiple videos for each one.
There are bonus videos that you get access to for loyalty.
There is an update almost every day. Nearly 2200 videos are available, some in 4K.
Bills using Epoch and CCBill, two of the most reliable in the business. |
| Cons: |
For the most part, the videos run two minutes or less.
There is no sex of any kind at all. It is good that the site sticks to the theme, but what a waste not to use the pornstar lineup here. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that interests me as a woman from India. Back home there, it is not uncommon for Indian men to urinate in public. If a woman did that, it would be a much lewder act. This is so looked down upon that it would actually be considered acceptable that if a male witnessed that, there would be severe penalties. In my case this has resulted in my being turned on by the idea of such a taboo act.
The appeal is more a fetish than erotic. There is no sex at all in any of the videos and I see that as a missed opportunity. The models are mostly very pretty, Eastern European and I recognized many of them from other porn sites. There are a few men on the sites though. They sometimes spy on the women while they are peeing and in a few cases stalk them. Their role on the site is not important and you never get to see them pee either. I wanted to see the men doing more. Maybe they should have been asserting dominance when they caught a peeing woman? I was hoping for that as it would have seemed what was a logical consequence in my native culture.
In some videos labeled as wetting, you see the women peeing in their clothes. I understand sometimes we all have to go, but these videos did nothing for me. Sometimes the women are in what are labeled as pissing scenes and some videos have them letting it all out in scenes outdoors. The difference is that in the second category the premise is that of desperation. A woman is on a bus and has the urge so bad she gets off to relieve herself. For me these are the reason to join the site. The natural way they act is a contrast with so much of the sex we see in porn. Nothing about a scene like these is fake, forced, unnatural or even hard to relate to. It can be easy to identify with the models. They could easily be you or someone you know. Who can say that there have been times we have not been in a similar situation?
The scenes I enjoyed the most were kind of a parody of the natural urges. There were contests and prizes awarded for holding your pee and the stars won or lost. Their personalities came out quite clearly and there was the reminder that these young ladies were doing the site for money. They had fun and they laughed. So did I.
Understandably, the videos were very short, about two minutes. The site stayed on topic and that is all the time needed. However you get updates almost every day. I liked the site, but it could have been better. A nice surprise here and there and a bit more of the unpredictable would have been better. |
|
09-07-21 04:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
186
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very big interracial site, but name could be misleading too. It’s not all blacks on blondes.
987 scenes with downloads of videos and photos
Currently updating once per week.
816 female models on this site.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
The scenes are very similar from scene to scene.
Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p.
Little to no story to the scenes.
4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This particular site focuses on anywhere from 1 to 5 black guys having sex with one white (most) woman. I do believe that’s misleading since I think “blonde” is a niche some porn viewers prefer. There are brunettes, redheads and I’m almost positive all of these women don’t fall under the “white” umbrella. Some look Asian, others Latina, some also look biracial.
There are inconsistencies with how the video resolutions are listed. The oldest video is listed as Big SD, that’s one video. The other older videos are listed as Big HD, but they are 480p which is SD.
The other parts of the network and this site are impressive. The amount of models just on this site (816), the amount of scenes (987) on this site and the majority of videos do have 720p and 1080p downloads. The picture sets are also downloadable and I haven’t seen any notices about download limits.
The scenes themselves leave very little to talk about. It’s get naked, follow a script, add 2-3 more guys, follow the script and the scene is over.
I would rate the female models as above average in looks, they all look like pornstars to me and many are in the MILF age range. The male models are as interchangeable as I assume male models in porn directed at men should be. It’s a good site by itself. It’s not going to make you laud the producers or site as the greatest, but if you’re into interracial and don’t mind it’s not all blonde models, you will probably like this site for its amount of content, amount of models and amount of scenes. That 4K price should lower the score, but seeing that I wasn’t that into these scenes, it’s not a big con for me. It is listed right in the cons. They charge $3.99 extra per scene for 4K. |
|
02-26-21 05:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
187
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, solo girl and lesbian scenes.
515 scenes with 3 to 4 scenes added each month.
Porn User's price of $14.95 is very good.
Downloadable videos and photo sets with each scene.
The newer videos have 4K.
Good use of settings including the bathroom and shower. |
| Cons: |
The not that much older scenes (2013) only have up to 720p.
Very little story or dialogue. |
| Bottom Line: |
The title of this site could be subjectively questioned. I didn’t list it as a con, but there are some models on this site I don’t even find attractive. My main interest in solo girl porn or lesbian isn’t in the model’s looks. I still don’t consider myself bisexual or lesbian. I do like watching younger women masturbate and play around with each other in lesbian scenes. I didn’t list the looks part in cons since their looks are not part of my interest in this type of content.
I was surprised to see the videos as new as 2013 only had up to 720p in the download options. The newer scenes have 720p, 1080p and 4K. The big mistake I likely make with sites like this one is I forget they don’t speak English -- or Hindi. I don’t require a story, but I do like to know what they are saying.
This is a normal solo and lesbian site. The lesbian scenes are believable enough. You can see the tongue touching the clitoris. The solo scenes feature believable orgasms including pussy lip spreading to show contractions. It’s hard to pick whether the solo or lesbian scenes are better or worse when comparing the two. The lesbian scenes do seem to get a little kinkier. One part I have noticed is the newer solo scenes are more dependent on toys instead of fingers. The older scenes have more fingering in them.
You have 515 scenes with video and photo sets. The update schedule is okay with 3, sometimes 4 new updates per month. The discounted price here on Porn Users helps a lot too.
My favorite setting for solo and even lesbian scenes is the bathroom or shower. They have a good selection of scenes from those locations. I think it’s just the belief these girls look so young they would be using the bathroom for their masturbation. I didn’t list this as a con, but could have. The camerawork could be better. I have watched several scenes where the model is orgasming in solo, but the camera is pulled back. I don’t want close-ups, but I would like to see a closer view on the orgasms.
It’s a good site for what it is, but I have seen better. That could be the language barrier. Some of the models are very quiet and barely look or sound like they are enjoying themselves. |
|
09-28-20 09:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
188
|
Bi Sex Digital
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Look what I accidentally found! The biggest bisexual site I have joined.
279 DVDs.
The DVDs average 3-4 scenes per each one.
Attractive males and pretty females.
A lot of orgies. |
| Cons: |
Look what I wished I hadn’t found. The list of complaints will have to go in the bottom line.
No downloads
The site pages take 3-10 seconds to load.
The streaming player is even slower and is glitchy.
The welcome email told me I have access to other sites. When I tried signing in them there’s no access. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said in previous reviews of bisexual sites it’s very hard to find good ones. I saw this in a Gamma promo, the price was low (under $10), the amount of content was the most I had seen. Nowhere on the join page or the promo was it mentioned there are no downloads. When I signed up the page glitched with a broken link that said, “Go to member’s area here”. I opened my email account and had two emails from them. Both said Bisexdigital in the subject, but inside the second one it said I have access to Austin Wilde. I went to that site and tried to sign in, it said no account. I went back to the other email which had a direct link to Bisexdigital. The site took forever to open. Once it did, I was able to sign into it and find out all the videos are streaming only.
The streaming player buffers every 3 seconds. The site itself takes up maybe half of my monitor. It looks like it was made in the early days of the internet.
The content looks good, but if I can’t get it to stream without constant buffering and can’t download it, what good is it?
They show having 279 movies. I do not know if they are just counting full DVDs or scenes. The Best Porn review says it has a 200GB daily download limit. The whole site says it has 403GB of videos. That makes the 279 sound like standard definition DVDs at around 1.5GB each.
I do recognize some of these scenes from my collection of bisexual scenes, but there are a lot I don’t have. I don’t know why so many bisexual sites are streaming only. Most of the content is from 8 or more years ago and is 480p in the streaming player.
They have some of the first bisexual DVDs I saw back in 2007. It’s easily the most impressive collection I have seen. With bisexual porn you already know it’s likely to be 480p, so that part is forgivable. I would be willing to pay more to have a download option. That is the main reason I’m not giving it a bad score. The scenes are good. If you’re okay with streaming these scenes are good. Bisexual porn was creative back then. |
|
07-15-20 04:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
189
|
Pantyhose Creep
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the very large Fetish Network of 52 sites
The site focuses on legs, short skirts and pantyhose
Interesting premise that got my attention
Very attractive models.
Good video quality
Good yearly price with promo
There is a voyeur and exhibitionist feel to the scenes. |
| Cons: |
Questionable business ethics
Isn't updating
Download limits
Small site |
| Bottom Line: |
When I originally reviewed The Fetish Network, I was happy with it, but I'm starting to become less interested in it.
There have been several complaints about this network. I have not had a lot of the common problems others have had. There is a problem with canceling that requires you to email them and there is a download limit.
I joined the network on a year subscription and it is non-recurring. This site was the one that interested me the most on the network. I have a reverse foot fetish and usually any site with pantyhose is set up for reverse foot fetish.
I used the reverse foot fetish term in the past and a few members asked what that means. Reverse foot fetish is when the female gets as much arousal from the foot fetish or more than the male. Pantyhose leads to this since the woman has to slide them off which makes a lot of women feel sexy. The guys in porn seem to always be horny anyway, but to see women who are horny before any sex even starts is -- in my opinion -- very erotic.
You can also find reverse foot fetish on the Jerk-off Instruction sites. I don't know if it is something a female would notice more, but the sheer pantyhose often shows how wet the woman is before the action starts.
This site does that well. The scenes are setup by a "perverted" man filming an unaware young woman. I don't know if this would hurt the fantasy for some, but most of the models don't have panties on under their short skirts. The guy becomes braver. This is shown by him moving closer and closer. Oops, he blew his cover or something else. He talks to the woman about how he would like to photograph her for a photography shoot. This leads to him asking for sex and that leads to the best part.
They deny him, but agree to tease, strip and even masturbate for his camera. That for me is enough to show the reverse foot fetish. She's as aroused as he is by him looking at her feet, thighs and everything her pantyhose shows.
That also shows the downside to this network. There are only 44 scenes on the site and it hasn't updated in years. The network has a similar problem. They have a lot of interesting and well-produced scenes, but I can't tell if anything is updating.
It might also show my very specific niche interests which isn't easy to fulfill.
I am in my 6th month of my membership and the sites that interested me the most, including this one, have not updated during those 6 months.
It was a good promo price back around Christmas and I really can't complain about my overall experience since I haven't had any of the problems others have. It makes me wonder if the year promo doesn't have download limits and non-recurring means I don't have to go through what sounds like a frustrating process.
This site would rate in the 90 range or higher just by itself if they had even 150-200 of these scenes. Be sure to make note of the other comments left on the network's page here. I can't verify the problems, but enough people have had them it's hard to ignore. I won't be rejoining once the year is up since I already have everything I want from the network. |
|
07-14-20 08:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
190
|
X Empire
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Four very specific sites in 1 network, Erotica X, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Over 1,300 scenes on the 4 sites combined and the network updates once per day.
461 models, all are professional models.
Site works well, you can view the newest content from the network page which shows content from all 4 sites or you can go directly to one of the sites.
Quality is very high and videos have 8 download options, up to 4K on newer scenes.
Photo sets are downloadable. |
| Cons: |
I have joined a lot of Gamma sites and always thought their cancellation process was very easy. Not this one, I entered my login and solved the captcha, it said I had to call to verify my account. I chose to chat and was on the chat for nearly 20 minutes.
The scenes on these 4 sites are some of the most redundant I have seen. I'm not saying they are bad, but I think there's a script and a timer that buzzes to switch positions. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was feeling positive about this network when I first joined it. I still am positive about it, but it started to feel like a letdown the further I got into the membership.
The four site format sounds like a good idea, but there's very little balance between the sites. Hard X has 664 scenes on it, Erotica X has just over 300, Lesbian X has just under 140 and Dark X has just over 200. I think it's for good reason too.
The Hard X and Erotica X scenes seem to have more time and thought put into them. Dark X is a lot like Blacked, but not as good. Lesbian X is a lot like Sapphic Erotica, but not nearly as good. Those sites are still updating, but you can see they are not their focus as a network and are not their strength.
All of the content on all 4 sites has a very sameness feel to them. The earliest scenes on Hard X almost look like a completely different site. Hard X is the best of the 4 sites even though it has a sameness from scene to scene in newer scenes. Erotica X looks to have the potential, but maybe they change producers? You will get 2-3 good scenes in a row, then 2-3 scenes that aren't even worth clicking on. And those are the two stronger sites of the 4.
I was talking to another PU member that is also a member and we both said the scenes feel like watching a cooking show. They roll the cookies out (position change), they put the cookies in oven (change position), they remove the cookies from the oven (change position) and they eat the cookies (cumshot). It is that timed and specific.
It doesn't make it bad. It just makes it feel like the scenes have very little thought going into them or effort. It makes the success of each scene dependent on the models in the scene. There are some with models that are excellent and seem to enjoy every minute of the sex while there are some that look like they are waiting on the buzzer to go off to change positions.
The videos are excellent quality to download. I didn't really like their streaming player. I used it 5 times and had multiple buffering moments in each scene. I don't think it was an internet problem, but it could have been. The newer scenes are available in up to 4K resolution (still waiting on Santa to bring me a 4K monitor), they look good enough to watch on 720p and even better at 1080p. The photo sets are not Met-Art or DDF quality, but they are okay and can be downloaded.
There's just an overall feeling of "it's okay" and that's how I feel about it. |
|
11-18-19 08:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
191
|
Class 3Some
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with three other sites in the Sensual Girl Network
Exceptionally beautiful and glamorously presented models
Every video is High Definition 720p
Absolutely one of the best glamour sex websites I have ever been a member of
There are 80 very erotic scenes
There is no mention of a download limit and I did not have a problem with one
Nice cumshots, but ordinary sized penises |
| Cons: |
There is no mention of the dates when the videos were posted
Not updating. The TBP review in 2013 showed more updates than there are now with 88 |
| Bottom Line: |
This site promises real swallows and kisses, the fantasy you deserve. This made me expect some site that thinks they know what kind of porn women like. The women are presented as glamorous, made up nicely to look their best. This is what I have seen others call glamcore, maybe even couples porn. I think that the site works well if that is what you are looking for. Everything about this site shouts hot sex that is not extreme, not for those who are looking for a site that has a hard edge.
The models don’t talk, a sign that they might be Eastern European. As such, a great number of them are blondes, mostly genuine ones that are not from the pharmacy. There are a few moans or grunts, but that is not common. What you do get in the background is some distracting elevator music that made me turn the sound off. Although I would not be comfortable doing this, if I were sharing a man with a friend, I know there would be some verbal interaction between us. I am not talking about anything profound, but us girls can be verbal. Even during sex, we react and share our thoughts.
My best guess is that these young ladies are pros, not amateurs, and are from 18 to maybe 22 or slightly older. The guys are a little older, say 35 to 45. They don’t take advantage of the age difference in the scenes, but I can’t imagine why not. For the most part, the scenes just happen spontaneously as a result of playful interactions. In one scene with a black man, he is watering the shrubbery. Two young women in bikinis tease him and he squirts them with the hose. Soon the bikinis come off and they are all laughing and the real hosing begins. Something missing is that I did not see any model’s names. Mostly the women are very slim, but range from petite to tall. The guys had pretty much average for porn sized cocks and the cumshots were mostly, maybe even all, external and fun to watch. I even saw a few black male models, a rarity in Eastern European porn.
Besides the attractiveness of the models, I also congratulate the site for making the sets so attractive. Many of the scenes are outdoors, using boats, beaches, pools and house decks to give a feeling of classy elegance. The feeling I had was one of a scene that was so beyond the ordinary that it helped to increase the fantasy. Most other porn sites just put two or more models in a room.
The sex itself is mostly oral done on the men, but you can also find vaginal and anal. Rimming is not uncommon and mostly done with the other woman also going down on him. Sometimes one woman has sex with the man while the other helps, as what they call on the site an assistant. Sometimes it is both women oral on the lucky guy. Sometimes he takes turns with sex with each one. I like that the models seemed to be having some fun and there were times I felt that there was some genuine chemistry going on. The best video quality is HD 720p, but very sharp except for a few older scenes.
I think the site is no longer updating as the TBP review in 2013 has 88 scenes listed and today there are 80. The scenes are undated. If I paid for just this site alone, I would feel that the quality of the scenes were worth the price to join. However, you also get three other high quality sites in the Sensual Girl Network. |
|
02-05-22 11:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
192
|
Euro Angels
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I have been a member of this network many times, but never noticed this site of very pretty European models in hardcore and lesbian scenes.
It is not updating, but it has 611 scenes. It is hard to quantify the difference between large sites with no updates and small sites with weekly updates. There is a lot here that is good.
Good differential in the time of the scenes, some are as short as 20 minutes, some are as long as 40 minutes. I have a theory at this point of my porn viewing and collecting hobby about that difference.
There is good kinkiness in these scenes which I don’t see as much in hardcore scenes from American models. A lot of niches are covered.
A lot of big name stars on this site, including some I didn’t know identified as European.
It’s my last pro, but it is the one I like the best. A lot of these scenes have more than two people in them. I think I have just reached boredom with one on one scenes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating, there is some good news, the majority of the scenes have HD downloads.
These are from DVDs based on the names of the scenes, but there is no continuity between the scenes. That is a part of porn I don’t understand.
This could be a pro or con. If you are familiar with sites like 21 Sextury, this is a lot like it and even features similar models but is a little kinkier. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not for sure about the validity of the name of this site. It is Euro Angels, but the first scene I noticed features Lisa Ann, who is an American. Maybe the other scenes from that DVD are mostly European models. I usually recognize maybe 20-25% of models by name. I recognize a lot of these including a male that I know is in a lot of scenes on 21 Sextury, named Choky Ice. This is professional porn. You’re not going to get much story.
You do get a lot of action. I believe this is impressing me from all the generic, I think it’s called heartcore or softcore-hardcore, that just seems like two people having regular sex. This site brings the porn part back into focus. There are threesomes, foursomes, two couples, that is porn to me. There are some one on one scenes and even some solo scenes. You still a lot more of the more than 2 people scenes. Showing the categories, I think, gives an idea of what I’m trying to say. Of the 611 scenes: 275 have anal, 52 have dual penetration, 13 have double blowjob, 23 are group sex, 113 are lesbian, 59 are solo, 52 are threesomes, that’s a good mixture. That, for me, is missing from most standard hardcore sites.
I was concerned about the video quality. About half of the scenes have HD, the ones before those are 480p. It’s worth a look. There are scenes on this site that I will keep over some of the newer scenes in high quality, just based on the energy and porn feeling of the scenes. I think the best ones are the two couples. They don’t swap. It’s two couples having sex on the same or adjacent couches. That is kinky to me. My theory on the different length scenes is I have noticed if a site has scenes that are all almost the same length (2-3 minutes difference), it’s very repetitive and planned out. I don’t care if every scene is planned just don’t make me has a reason to see that. There are hardcore sites where at 8 minutes, the oral stops, at 12 minutes the woman goes into cowgirl, at 20 minutes it’s doggystyle and at 23 minutes, the cumshot. On this site there is as much as a 20-30 minute difference in scenes. Just from watching the scenes I can see that there is a difference. We talk about using our imaginations. Doing the same thing at the same time in each scene shuts my imagination off. I already know what the next position will be. It’s a site not to overlook. |
|
01-12-22 08:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
193
|
Sperm Swap
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best thing about this niche is you always get at least 2 women for each guy
Very high quality and recent updates.
A total of 209 scenes with videos, photos and screenshots, all are downloadable.
I’m continually surprised by how attractive I find these European models.
Scenes are long, some as long as an hour. |
| Cons: |
It’s not really a niche I’m that into myself. The whole swapping spit or cum or bodily fluids never really did much for me.
Even though updates have been coming in there’s no consistency to when the next one will be. Maybe they’ll prove me wrong with two in July 2021, and one so far in August 2021. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of those niches I never really understood why it’s considered a niche. The sperm swap takes up maybe 30 seconds to 1 minute of the scene while the other 50+ minutes is at least a threesome. I feel like the cumshot is the most important part of a porn scene and know a lot of females feel the same way too. I guess we are predisposed to see that as our success when we have sex. So, to catch it in your mouth and spit it in your friend’s mouth, what’s the attraction?
You do still get over 200 scenes of at least threesomes with two attractive women and a man. The scenes are long and both women get a full working over by the man, no hole left untouched. There’s a kinkiness to these threesomes since nearly every scene has anal, vaginal and oral. You’ve got women pulling a dick out of another woman’s butt and sticking it in her mouth. The professional level of these models shows in their performances and in their stamina. I never took that into consideration when looking at scene length. These performers go at it for nearly an hour. They look like it too. By the end of the scenes they are sweaty, body parts are splayed open and messy. Maybe this is how you do hardcore?
I just stop watching once the cumshot has landed in one of the women’s mouths.
There are 209 scenes. The most recent 20 scenes have up to 4K. Before that, things get sketcky. But this is something I have felt with multiple sites from this group. The older scenes do take a hit in technical quality with the videos topping out at 540p, but the women are so pretty and sexy. I do not know most current models, so I definitely don’t know these models. Some of their best scenes on this site are from 2005-2006. Some of those even drop even lower in quality to 384p, which is pushing it, but it’s so hard to ignore the looks of these models. It’s more disappointing, at least for me, that the names do not help. One is Mercedes and Dianne. Those two are two of the sexiest models I’ve seen in porn, but there’s no way to know what other content they have (even on other sites) as their names are common and lacking a surname. That is going to make me lower the score when you combine that fact with the niche or I prefer “gimmick” not appealing to me. I do think it’s worth checking out to look at the models.
I will end with they do have newer scenes, three in the last 2 months, it’s hard to tell if they’re going to restart these sites. Not liking the niche makes this one less of an interest to me, but if I were them, if at all possible, I would remaster those old scenes. There are some scenes there that are really good. I did find watching those old scenes in a media player at 70% of monitor size to be okay, a little blurry, but I would rather watch blurry sexy models than clear unattractive models. |
|
08-31-21 08:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
194
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big site with a lot of teen (females) having hardcore sex.
414 scenes with new updates only coming at 1 per month.
Scenes include a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
Nearly all of the models are very attractive if you’re into teens.
If you’re into porn not looking like porn this would be a good site for you. It looks like two people just meeting up at one of their houses and having sex. |
| Cons: |
There’s not a lot here to keep me interested except the pretty models. Since I’m not a lesbian that’s not really enough for me.
I don’t know if they are going for the obvious formula not just in the sex, but also in the setting, but is surprising to me to see how much these scenes look alike.
I also wasn’t expecting to see so many tattoos. I like tattoos. It just looks unusual to see teen porn models with full thigh tattoos.
The guys are rarely attractive. |
| Bottom Line: |
As much as any site I have been on this one shows the need for attractive men in porn. Besides the tattoos that seem out of place on the young females, the guys either have oddly placed tattoos or 1980’s style earrings. The guys aren’t likely teens. Most look in their late 20’s at the youngest. Some look like they were born before me. I don’t know if the tattoos clash with the sterile white backdrops in most of the scenes or what it is that I don’t like about the combination of the models/settings, but it’s just not appealing to me. As pretty as some of the models are there are some that are very pale with very dark tattoos having sex in a completely white room. Maybe that is it, the dark tattoos distract my vision and cause me to focus on them.
This is one of the biggest sites in this group of sites with 414 scenes, but they are only updating once per month. I didn’t consider it a con, but there is no ethnic diversity at all. I expected that since the site isn’t based in an ethnically diverse area, but that only hurts the formulaic feel of everything. This is as close to cut and paste porn as I have seen. I join porn sites to see people having sex in non-traditional ways, but what I see here reminds me of the first few times I had sex.
They do have 4K available on the newer videos and the quality is good even if you don’t want the 4K. They have 1080p, 720p, 480p and the site works well. It reminds me of when someone cooks a meal and they put more into the presentation than the taste of the food. With the amount of scenes they have and the amount of pretty models you are sure to find some scenes that interest you. I just don’t think you’re going to find anything you haven’t seen a hundred times before. I’m not going to give a real low score as I will give some leeway for subjectivity. It’s just not a site or network I will try again. I do think there is a market for this type of content. I would think males that just want to see pretty, naked, young females would be that market. I am going to say more than 95% of the content on the site is one on one with only a few threesomes and one or two foursomes or more. Maybe America has taken over my thought process. I think of porn and think of something different than what is very normal sex.
It’s a good site for high quality content with pretty, slim/slender models, just don’t expect to see anything new or different here. |
|
09-28-20 09:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
195
|
Family Screw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Small, but kinky and perverse threesomes to group sex.
With such a small collection you can at least say you liked every scene.
All 24 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p
Some of these scenes reach new highs or lows in how believable and perverse they are.
I received a promo for it after being a member of Granddadz and Grandparents X. This is similar to those sites and really would like to see them combine them all into one network.
Updating twice per month. |
| Cons: |
I’ve seen some young male porn stars that seem overworked, but there’s a guy on here that I see in scenes all across this company’s sites named Gunther. He looks 60s, maybe 70s. I only list this as a con because he has trouble keeping it up.
I take this type of porn with the belief it’s in humor. At least one scene on this site is nearing disgusting.
There are some scenes that I don’t know who is supposed to be related or married or what they’re even doing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This disgusting scene features Gunther, see con #1 and a much younger male with a much older woman who I would describe as Marilyn Manson, 20 years from now, after a sex change. The subject of the scene even recognizes it, “Nasty present for youngest son”. A lot of these scenes are good. A few of them push the bad taste envelope.
I thought the best scene on the site was the best of any of their older/younger sites, it’s titled, “Luxury Wellness Receptionist” and has a very attractive man with a very pretty woman while Gunther joins in. He’s like a little Leprechaun.
I have had one common problem with their older/younger scenes and that is how short the scenes are. They have one scene here that has 9 people in it and it lasts barely 20 minutes.
The good thing with these sites is the high quality videos. 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The navigation doesn’t have to be that good. Every scene is on one page. I don’t recognize any of the models except Gunther. The main theme here starts with some sort of family connection. One is a family that is going to swinger’s club. I don’t know that I like admitting it, but the attraction for me is in the perverse nature of this niche. And they have such a broad range in looks between the models that it’s hard to imagine it being any less perverse, even without relation.
I’ll give it a decent score for the high quality everything and continuing to make scenes that seem near impossible to talk the younger people into. If they would combine this site with Grandparents X, Granddadz, Grandmams, I think it would be a major hit and at the top the older/younger genre.
Maybe it’s just my mind working in a bad way, but what happens – you know, when Gunther and the older stars kick the bucket? Of course, they can replace them, but he’s in so many of these scenes. The changes I would like to see made is either creating a network out of all their older/younger sites or speeding up the updates. I think if they combined the sites into a network you would be looking at a md-90s score. As it is, with a slow update schedule and a few really good scenes they have a chance to have a good to great site as the new updates come in, but it’s still going to take 3-4 years for them to just reach 100 total scenes.
It’s worth trying if you have tried and liked their other older/young scenes, especially if you get one of the cheaper promos, otherwise, I would wait a while and see what direction they take these sites into. |
|
04-29-20 03:13am
Replies (7)
|
Review
196
|
Anal Angels
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very pretty and young models having anal sex.
213 scenes, uneven updating schedule, sometimes 2 per month, sometimes 1 per month.
Excellent video quality and streaming interface, all videos are downloadable too as are photo sets.
Vendo for the biller.
No download limits that I have ran into.
Navigation works well. |
| Cons: |
These scenes – even with anal – are not that hardcore.
One I usually won’t mention as a female, but the guys on this site are not very attractive.
I think the language barrier causes some problems since these are scenes that look like they need a plot but can’t do so since the models aren’t English speakers. |
| Bottom Line: |
I run into sites like these more than I should. I usually don’t stereotype or have preconceived notions, but my thinking was this site would be at least medium hardcore. I thought that since it has anal in the title. It feels unfair to say this, but a lot of the guys on this site seem very young, inexperienced and even effeminate. Kind of like they are gothic or emo guys. That was a big turn-off for me.
The scenes, as I’m finding with these Russian sites, follow a very strict formula and there’s little to no dialogue I can understand. I speak and write English, four dialects of Hindi, but no Russian!
The quality is very good. All 213 scenes have at least 720p with the majority having 1080p and the newer ones having 4K. There are no download limits, you can also download the photos for each scene.
The female models are very pretty. I just really feel like either there’s a language barrier taking away from these scenes or they just make the same scene with different people from scene to scene. There’s a heavy formulaic feeling, the videos are not very long 20-25 minutes on most. I think I had too high of expectations coming into this site.
I am sure there are some that would like it. A lack of story, dialogue, really a lack of any personality from either the male or female and you end up with what it probably looked like the first time I had sex. Most of these female models would probably be better off in solo scenes. They're not showing much arousal other than seeing a naked guy with a hard dick. |
|
02-02-20 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
197
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An unusual site to me. It’s mostly pretty and cute women teasing and giving blowjobs. There is some sex in scenes beyond the blowjob.
Based on my time on Amateur Allure and receiving a promo offer to Swallow Salon which I joined from, I believe the two sites are owned by the same person or group. They are doing the same thing here with a lot of remasters being posted as updates.
There are some fetishes on this site. The women wear a uniform that looks like a cross between Star Trek and a nurse. The women swallow. There is a lot of teasing and smiling from the women.
There are 213 models. I recognize a lot of the names. It’s definitely leaning towards the cute, pretty look from the models. There is even giggling in the scenes.
Video and photo quality is very good |
| Cons: |
They are posting some kind of compilations along with remasters as new updates. The compilations just look like maybe from Amateur Allure. I don’t see anything in the newest scenes that looks new or that the watermark agrees with it being new.
The room they are in is strange. It looks like a possible padded room or a poorly designed sci-fi room. The lights change colors during the scene. I found it distracting. |
| Bottom Line: |
I described a lot of the site in the pros and cons. I feel like is a polarizing site. That room alone could be a problem for some viewers. Background lights that look like Christmas lights changing from green to teal to red. Add the strange uniforms that makes me think they were going for sci-fi porn. The models are plenty cute enough and pretty enough. They do seem to have fun in these scenes. There’s a lot of laughing and giggling. It looks like to me the site is dead. That should have been a con since they regularly charge $30 for this site. It’s far from a $30 site. The scenes are short, other than the compilations you won’t find many over 20 minutes. It seems like a waste. The models are into it. They’re all dressed up in their uniforms and looking cute. I feel like the models are just the supporting actresses to this guy’s dick.
The site is not very big. Especially considering the Amateur Allure compilations started showing up as updates around the time Covid started. That’s 2 years of no real updates unless I’m missing a few. I don’t have much knowledge of this site. I am thinking the ones that have 4K are remasters. None of the watermark years match the release year and most of those are 4-6 years difference. If you’re an ex-member that doesn’t care about 4K there may not be anything new on here. If you do like 4K and want those, you will have to deal with the daily download limit.
I’m starting to think this site is wanting to make me second guess my original thought on a score. I was checking the download size for the 4K ones, but I don’t see any. Including one that says, “Remy Lacroix eating her protein in stunning 4K”. There is no 4K download option on it. After seeing that, I’m not going to back and change my words since it’s not my fault if they lied. I am pointing it out that I do not see any 4K downloads. I see 1080p, 720p, 480p and a mobile resolution.
That’s not a big deal to me but may be to others. I would still recommend the site, but not at the regular price. I would even recommend it at a lower price just because the models are well above average and seem like they’re having a good time. I talked about the colors, some of the scenes with laughing and giggling almost look like hallucinations with all the changing lights in the background. It’s different and unique, but that’s not always good.
I think if you can get a promo on this site with Amateur Allure it’s worth a membership. It’s definitely not the extremely impressive site I was expecting. |
|
04-11-22 07:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
198
|
Anal BBC
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big name female models considering the niche.
105 scenes currently, 2 updates per month.
Each scene has a photo set you can download and a video.
Curiosity drew me to these sites: I have seen clips that include a bisexual male twist that may go unnoticed.
No 4K, but all scenes have up to 1080p. Is 4K disappearing? Even the newest scenes don’t have it.
Easy to cancel which was important. Didn’t recognize biller, but curiosity was pushing me to join. Cancel was as easy as any site with automated cancel. |
| Cons: |
This specific site really plays to a stereotype of the horny, slutty, MILF that cannot get enough sex. Some of these female models are very pretty 30s – 40s women, they make them look trashy and slutty on this site.
The only thing more of than fake boobs are the ads. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t know how many of these sites I will review. The curiosity that was piqued by samples from this site was the obvious straight males, having their dicks rubbed together as the woman gives a double blowjob. I don’t know if I’ve just never paid attention to that. It is something I find arousing. I was able to get a deal around Christmas. There is some dick rubbing going on.
This site is so straightforward there’s not a lot you can say about it. Some of the scenes are threesomes. Those are the best ones. There is no story. Well, I guess there is for the entire site. It’s a older (by porn standards) women that has the fantasy of taking a big, black cock up her butt. There are names I know and as I have told before, I don’t know a lot of models by name. I know these are well-known. There’s Lisa Ann, Simony Diamond, Annisa Kate, these are attractive models.
I’m going to just think about a suggestion. I think this would work better if the guys were younger. Most of the guys look 30s and 40s. That is a problem I have with MILF porn. I see MILF as experienced and seducing younger men. I mean no offense to the guys in the scenes. They seem really happy to be in the scenes. No seduction was needed. The women do make or break these scenes. You can see that all of the women are capable of handling dual penetration. That is the part that saves this site. Lisa Ann and especially Simony Diamond, they are making me feel like they not only enjoy this, they could add a few more guys. I mentioned the part that interested me. That is power games. I do like the scenes where the woman not only is up for the challenge but seems to want even more of a challenge.
I don’t know why there’s not 4K. The newest update was January 25, 2022. The scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p downloads. There are picture sets you can download. I would recommend not reading the synopsis for each scene. The stereotypes are beat to death on this site. If you’re into anal, MILF, dual penetrations. There is content you will like. You have to have tempered expectations. The ads are the best way to end this review. This site is part of Analized. Analized is part of Full Porn Network. Those are somehow related to Porn Force and those are related to James Deen’s site. I thought I was getting all of them. Instead, I only got 6 anal sites. I will have to figure out which one gets the sites I was wanting. |
|
02-05-22 11:23am
Replies (0)
|
Review
199
|
Class Lesbians
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many beautiful Eastern European barely legal and twenty something young ladies
All the videos are available in 4K
I felt these were very natural and real orgasms.
Has good sensuality between the models
Easy navigation |
| Cons: |
Only 37 videos. May not be updating as TBP shows 34 last February, one year ago.
Does not come with any other sites or extras.
Background music |
| Bottom Line: |
I love seeing orgasms in videos, whether it is a heterosexual couple, a gay couple, a lesbian couple or a threesome with any combination including bisexual and transgender. I am very heterosexual, but I have to admit to a curiosity about women. I think most women are curious, but not all of us admit that. I have a friend that I have not experimented with, who is seriously into lesbian sex. She told me that you do what you do when you masturbate, but you do it to and with someone else. I have also heard that another woman can push your buttons in a different way than men are capable of. The dynamic is completely different. I also realize that I can’t speak from experience.
One thing I can recognize is if an orgasm is real or if a model is only going through the motions and faking it. When I see a woman tense up, lose focus, shake, even lose control, I know what I am witnessing. That to me is how I know it is the real thing. I can easily identify with the model and that makes me get off.
These women are Europeans, not Americans and to me they look very exotic. Mostly they are very fair in complexion and have either light brown hair, or blondes or redheads. In India we don’t have that kind of variety. Besides the fantasy of being with another woman, now there is also the fantasy of her being a stark contrast with most people from my native country. Another contrast is how young and eager these women are. I see attractive women in their early to late twenties who are still exploring their sexuality.
The scenes seem to be mostly spontaneous and not overly directed. The setup is there, but what happens looks to be whatever the women get in the mood for. In one scene, two women are in a secluded park. They do what comes naturally as they feel they are alone and not being watched or judged. In another, a female friend goes to visit a woman in the hospital. She is so happy to see her friend that they end up doing the deed. Ok it does not look like a hospital and it is all too convenient that no one stumbles into the room. You just have to go along with it as this is a porn fantasy, not Hollywood. But the sex works well and that is pretty much what I came for.
The sex is not abusive or femdom and it is not only soft pussy licking either. Basically you get just about everything that women can do together. You get pussy licking with a lot of clit sucking, but also ass licking. You get gentle fingering of both pussy and ass. You get massages using oil and there is always a happy ending. You get dildos, vibrators and Hitachi wands. You get some strap on use, but it is not as aggressive or abusive as some sites. You get scissoring that seems to work for the models as a last step towards an orgasm.
The site is easy to use and you can search, but there are no tags. The site does not include any other extras. The women are beautiful. The sets are fantastic. The camerawork is first rate. What more can I ask for? Well there are only 37 scenes and I fear the site is no longer updating. I like what I saw here, but I think this site belongs in a network as an extra. |
|
02-05-22 11:10am
Replies (0)
|
Review
200
|
Dom The Nation
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Updates every two weeks, excellent for a specialized niche site
Extremely high level of creativity
Has links with discounts for its sister BDSM sites, Assylum and Slavemouth
Not only a fetish site for BDSM, it works as an older/younger site and a rarity for porn, every scene is outdoors in a rural, natural setting
Uses tags like painal, whipping, and impact play.These are specific to BDSM scenes |
| Cons: |
Less than 40 updates and six are only a few photos
The videos and photo sets are not separated |
| Bottom Line: |
Some sites are easy to compare to their competitors as they have a lot in common. Very few sites can be truly called unique or original. But then again I occasionally run across the rare site that is so different that it can truly be called out of the norm, in a way that you can only hope that others will imitate. You may well ask, what is so different? Two people or more take off their clothes and do the deed, so how is this site worthy of singling out for praise?
Porn is about fantasy and many times the porn you see is not truly how it is done offscreen by regular people like you and me. A great example is that most lesbian porn is a fantasy for men and real lesbians have told me that they don’t like a lot of it. This site is a work of love by real life Dom Neil, who found much of the BDSM porn made today does not appeal to him.
He is also quite a camera artist and loves the freedom and beauty of nature. If the idea of seeing scenes shot outdoors day and night, with all levels of lighting appeals to you, this is your site. If you love seeing rented farmland, or mountains, streams and models having fun appeals to you, this just may be your site. The same is true for camerawork that should be studied and imitated on how to get the essence of the model’s personality. Or maybe you just like unrehearsed, never overplanned and never boring BDSM with great models who enjoy their work.
In some of the first few updates, you get journal entries and playful scenes more than the sex scenes. The site started off a bit slowly as they started filming in 2019, but delayed the launch until February of 2021. As a result the site does not have a ton of content. The planning that went into filming the site gives it a lot of potential moving forward. The models wear custom made audio collars that work well in order to pick up sounds outdoors. Every scene is shot with the panorama of nature a second focus to the models and the action.
The video specs can be confusing. The main thing to note is the films are presented in 2.39:1 (very widescreen) cinema format, using film with some anamorphic lenses, and when you desqueeze the image from the lenses, this is the size you get. It's great for capturing the beauty and presence of the landscapes. The movies on the site are filmed in cinemascope and the actual videos specs are a bit different from regular 16:9 video specs due to the cinemascope format.
All of the sexual content revolves around very hard BDSM. If you find a site like this to be appealing, you will find a lot to like such as difficult positions, bondage, anal, rimming, forceful oral and peeing. In every case, he makes sure the models act out fantasies they have and gets the maximum pleasure from them captured on film. There is also playful content that helps you see a real, very accessible side to the models too. An example of one of the playful scenes has Rory Knox using a blow dryer on the Dom’s underwear as an example of another kind of blowjob. Another scene that I enjoyed was the same Rory Knox giving Dom Neil a foot job. She licked every toe and took his foot into her mouth as acts of worship like I have never seen before.
In another with a high level of male fantasy, Audrey Holliday who was beaten and anally abused while, hold on, playing football. I can imagine a guy grabbing a beer and watching this scene in a loop during halftime. My absolute favorite scene was any of the three that Rebel Rhyder was in. The one where she was cosub with Brooke Johnson was amazing as they both obeyed Dom Neil in a scene worthy of an award. The interactions between them, as well as with Dom Neil, were enough to make me love the site.
The site was easy to use, except for the fact that the videos and the photo sets were mixed together. The site lists updates in chronological order, not by type. Additions currently are every two weeks, but the archive is still small with less than 40 and that includes photo updates. I liked the site and can confidently predict a great future for it as it has a great concept and does what it does very well. |
|
10-28-21 07:41pm
Replies (0)
|
|
