| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
201
|
Czech Hotties.com
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nice size library of 126 videos and photosets.
However, the TBP review in 2011 mentions over 130.
Beautiful Eastern European models, thin and many are blondes.
The models are introduced stripping from nice clothes. I loved the sexy shorts for example
Easy searches for content
Part of 71 site PUBA network
The orgasms seem real and not faked |
| Cons: |
The scenes are not dated. The one listed as most recent is Standard Definition 640x480.
Low quality small photos. I saw the measurements for one as 1000x666. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like solo masturbation sites of all kinds, both male and female. If someone is having fun getting off, I can imagine myself witnessing or participating right along with them. I joined the Puba network for a few of their sites and this was one I had hoped would be one of their better ones. The women are uniformly young, pretty, thin and sexy to a fault. The scenes start with the model stripping to nude from ordinary street clothes. The outfits were not exotic or designed for a porn scene. No lingerie or stripper clothes are to be seen. Many of them are wearing short shorts and these showcase their legs. In many cases I saw enhanced breasts and those I don’t like.
In the scenes have the models use fingers to get them off. In most videos there are dildos and in some there are other toys. At this point I must stop and explain. These are old videos by porn standards. I saw only Standard Definition videos and the quality a mere 640x480. That would date these scenes as pre 2010, as around then we started to see High Definition. In 2011 the review by The Best Porn mentions there were over 130 videos and today there are 126. At the time these videos were new, there were nowhere near the quality or variety of sex toys we have now. No wands are on the site, in fact there is not a single battery either.
Given that limitation, the action is both oral and anal. Some scenes have a dildo in her mouth, simulating oral sex. Some scenes have the expecting vaginal insertion, but others also have anal insertions. I saw some ass to mouth and a lot of dildo licking too. In a few scenes there is a double penetration that was a visual treat. Further, there are some large dildos, but not extremely large, some are black and some are white. There are a few lesbian scenes too. They use fingers, dildos and toys on each other, but they also use tongues.
Although there is no talking, which is common in Eastern European porn, there was quite a bit of moaning and other noises that did not sound fake or just acting. I think these women got off on what we witnessed.
If I were writing this in 2011, this would get a higher score. In spite of this being part of a large network, the low quality is a deal breaker. I love the concept and wish new, more high quality updates were coming. |
|
09-07-21 05:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
202
|
Pure POV
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Really pretty models shot in POV.
Long to longer scenes in the 30-45 minute range.
Despite being a small site (70 scenes) and the updates stopping over a decade ago, the content is either remastered or they were releasing 1080p videos over a decade ago. The technical quality doesn’t show the age of the site.
Videos are downloadable as are professional photo sets and also downloadable screenshots.
Good diversity in the scenes/action. The site doesn’t stick to one formula from scene to scene. |
| Cons: |
It’s a difficult con to list since I wouldn’t have known it if the dates on the scenes hadn’t told me this site hasn’t been updated in over 10 years.
Other than that and the small collection of 70 scenes, I am someone who likes POV and 70 scenes of high quality POV isn’t really a con to me, but believe it should be listed in cons. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is one of those that makes me wonder what other sites have been doing for the last 15 years. The newest update on this site is nearly 13 years old, but the models are very pretty and the quality of the video only drops out on the oldest 20 scenes. It even only drops to 540p. The rest of the scenes have 720p and 1080p download options.
The lack of story is expected due to it being European. I’m still waiting on more of those European studios to discover the use of English subtitles. The POV filming on this site is very good. You get various locations, some cosplay, indoors, outdoors, and it looks like this site at one time was a pretty big deal. I do not know these models, but have read multiple PU members talk about the European models of the 2000s and I see what they mean. There’s hardly a dud in any of these models. The action is professional and maybe that could be not as good to some. There’s not a lot of variance or uniqueness other than the POV camera.
If I have any complaint about the content it’s that some of the scenes just seem too casual. One of the scenes has a woman doing anal and she looks like she’s just sitting back watching a television show. There are no scenes with more than two people in the scene and I usually do find that as a negative. I believe porn needs to look into the competitive aspect of having multiple women in one scene with one man. It just seems like when it’s one on one there’s not as much energy.
I do believe the site is at least worth looking into if you’re into POV and especially blonde models. There are multiple blonde models on this site that really stand out to me. Their names are generic enough that I don’t know if there’s anyway to look them up, like Sabrina, Ildiko and Eva.
There are 70 scenes. Those can be downloaded with no limits and there are downloadable photo sets as well as downloadable screenshots. I could see downloading 40-50 of the scenes they do have and being happy with that. I’m not going to score it as high as the quality deserves to be scored, just because there seems to be no way they’ll ever start updating this site again, but will score it high enough to at least nudge you to check it out if you get the chance. I’m pleasantly surprised with the content. |
|
08-31-21 08:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
203
|
Smut Puppet
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There are close to 2000 videos across the network.
Downloads were fast enough.
Three different download options as to quality. Two are HD, but not 4K.
There is a nice mix of beautiful American and European models.
The site is easy to use. |
| Cons: |
Mentions cam site with ads on every page.
The network has not updated since March.
Some videos seem to be remastered as the quality is sometimes not what I expected. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an interesting network in many ways and there is a lot to see here. The details breakdown like this:
3 Way Fuck – Some with two men, some with two women. Last update 2020
Black and Big – Huge very dark black men with white women. Last update was 2019
Blondes Love Dick - Last update 2020
Brunettes Love Dick - Last update January 2021
Cougar Kingdom – MILFS with older and younger men. Last update 2016
Dark Sodomy – Black men with mostly but all white women, Anal. Last update 2021
Do The Wife – Cuckolding . Many are white husband watching wife with black man. Last update 2021
GenLez – Standard lesbian action. Last update 2021
Golden Slut – Older women about 50 more or less and younger guys. Last update 2020.
Granny Vs BBC – Mostly in their fifties women with much younger black men There is a lot of anal. Last update 2019.
Group Fuck Site – Four or fivesomes. Last update 2020.
Mature Fucks Teen – Older/Younger but not big age difference. Last update 2021
MILF Sodomy – Anal sex with older models, but not much different age than the men. Last update 2021.
Smut Merchants – A little of everything, but I did not see interracial or older/younger. Last update 2018
Sugga Bunny – Black women mostly with black men, some interracial. Last update 2021.
Team Fucks Girl – gangbangs, some interracial and some even with Asian women. Last update 2019
Teen Erotica XXX – They look like barely legal and very young. Last update 2021.
What I see here are a few themes. One is that there are a lot of interracial videos and some of them have a focus that you don’t often see, like cuckolding, or only anal, or older women.
Another theme is that there are also older/younger pairings and some are older women with younger men, which is uncommon in porn. For the most part, the scenes are straight to the action, but a few have a little bit storyline.
The models are familiar ones from the United States and Europe of recent years and are attractive to downright gorgeous. The site works well enough and it is easy to search for what you want to see. I would have liked 4K as an option, but HD is just fine. Download speeds were adequate and I found no limits on what I can keep.
Unfortunately, it looks like the site no longer is adding new videos. Some of the sites have not updated in a few years. Every page in the members’ area has ads for the cam site, but the link leads nowhere. I like that you get almost 2000 videos, but the quality varies quite a bit between the older videos and the most recent. But, at least you get some unusual themes for porn and links to discounts for other sites. |
|
08-31-21 08:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
204
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large, hardcore site focused on anal sex.
854 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Up to 4K video downloads on newer scenes.
Each scene has a professional quality downloadable photo set.
The models are professionals and most are European. The average model on this site is at least attractive. |
| Cons: |
Hopefully, you are just on the site for the porn/sex. This site has little to no plot to the scenes and very little talking or set up.
At least for me, the guys are a mixed bag when it comes to attractiveness. It could be the European part.
Scenes are long which is usually a pro for me, but with no story or set up, the length is just a show of the long, I would even say dullness of the content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Asshole Fever is a site that I believe is love or hate. If you absolutely love anal sex and no story, it may satisfy you, but for me the site falls short.
On the technical side of things they do everything right. The newer scenes have video downloads from 140p to 4K. Those can also be streamed in a streaming player that works well. The picture sets are even good quality, around 150 photos per set and high resolution or low resolution download zips. The site works well, but when your content is this narrow of a niche, there isn’t a lot of work needed to keep the site from being confusing. You’re going to get basic, shallow, anal sex in each scene. I usually don’t look into European sites. My little experience with porn tells me European sites are often too straightforward (which may not mean shallow to you) and to the point. There needs to be more to keep my interest and attention.
The female models are attractive and if I could give the site a positive comment about their content, most of this is not violent, or ultra-hardcore anal. Some of the scenes even remind me of what other PU reviewers describe as heartcore.
The site is large with 854 scenes and they are updating -- not on a perfectly set schedule, but do average 2 updates per month. I believe once a site has over 500 scenes they are getting into the area of there’s going to be overkill when the scenes don’t vary much. That is what plagues this site for me. I have nothing against anal sex and have joined and enjoyed anal sites before, but without much communication between the actors, the lack of a story, there starts to be too much working against the site. I even wonder if the one on one aspect of the content hurts it for me. That I have seen there is not even a threesome scene. It’s all one on one and that does create a dilemma for me. Maybe I am thinking the anal genre, it should be more raunchy, or more hardcore, but it’s just not. The scenes are plain and I want to believe a less mainstream act like anal should be more than plain.
This may not even be a negative about the content itself. I usually do not like sites that find one set niche or genre and just do it to death. You can see the negative puzzle coming together. No story, no talking, anal, anal, anal, nothing raunchy or kinky, every scene, over and over. I won’t go that low on the score since I do believe my subjective opinion is hurting the score. The site does most everything right except for parts that I don’t like. It could be okay for others, then the high quality content would be a major pro. For me, I have seen better anal sites. |
|
08-10-21 06:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
205
|
Tricky Spa
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that lives up to its name, it’s up to the viewer whether that’s a pro or not.
103 scenes, but quality may top quantity in this case.
They stick with trickiness in length of scenes, some are 50 minutes, others are barely 20, some have stories, others don’t.
Really attractive models (some of the guys too), there are 114 models including males. Also does a good job on the “creepy, older guy” casting.
All videos have 7 download formats including 720p and 1080p, but no 4K. Photo sets are also included and downloadable, they look like screen captures to me. |
| Cons: |
If you join thinking this is another massage site, you are going to be partially disappointed. Or if you’re expecting scenes in a spa or even anything related to a spa.
Their update schedule is tricky too. No updates in 2021, none in 2020, 1 in 2019, 2 in 2018 and the other 101 came between 2015-2017. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site oddly appealed to me. It’s part of a message network and the first 50 or so scenes followed the same formulaic “massage scene” style. The room was the same in all those scenes. The scenes were short (most under 20 minutes) and it was just another massage site. I am going to take a guess that someone said “this is just another massage site” and maybe a producer got replaced. The last 50 or so scenes could be anything. Some are in a bedroom, the actors and actresses seem to try and keep with the spa/massage theme, almost in a sarcastic way like Abella Danger throwing a cup of water on a guy. These scenes have stories and are often 40-50 minutes long. I feel like those scenes should be a message to all porn sites. Why not just let the actor and actress (a few have more than one female) just go with the flow instead of following a set formula? I am impressed by how many of those 50 newest scenes end with the guy cumming on the woman’s body instead of holding his cum for the cameraman to get a closeup of the woman’s about to be splatted face.
Even though the updates have been sporadic and most are from a few years ago they do still offer downloads up to 1080p on all of the videos. The picture sets, I’m not a photo set expert by any stretch of the imagination, but the photos look like screen captures to me and they are the same resolution as the videos. I don’t think you can have any optimism about new scenes, but these newer scenes on the site make it look like they just stick scenes on here that don’t fit on their other themed sites. Maybe they will find some more new scenes. I do believe the actors and actresses play a big part in my enjoyment of the newer scenes. I don’t really like naming an actor in what will be seen as a negative way, but Eric Masterson makes the most perfect, “creepy, older guy” and he may be trying to go for that in his acting. These newer 50 scenes show what decent acting can add to porn.
The first 50 scenes were mostly guy massaging woman, woman notices guy is aroused, massaging turns to sexual touching and then sex. The newer scenes don’t even have massage in them. I still can’t give the site that high of a score. It does seem like it’s a site where someone just decided they were going to completely change the direction of the site and it worked. It’s just there are not any new scenes coming out. Just like I can’t give it a really good score, I can’t give it a bad one either. It is called “Tricky” spa and they just completely changed the theme of the site midway through its life. |
|
08-09-21 03:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
206
|
Mylked
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site on the Tug Pass network and in my opinion, the best site in the network.
Pretty models (most)
Scenes give full view of the nude female model while she pleasures a dick through a milking table.
Updates once per month (very important to the review).
65 scenes, all available to download in 1080p and unlimited downloads.
Photographs with each scene are downloadable and often show more than the videos do. Possibly because of different angles? |
| Cons: |
It’s a small site and only is updating once per month.
It’s a narrow niche, every scene is nearly exact in execution.
Some unattractive models including what they list as GILFs |
| Bottom Line: |
I was going to review the network Tug Pass as a whole, but believe this site is more important. This will cover both the network and this site Mylked. Mylked is clearly a newer site on the network. It only lists one update per month. The older sites say they are updating weekly (recycling). The sites you should look into if you are interested in joining this network are: Mylked and Shady Spa, those from the best I can tell, are the only ones definitely updating with new content. Mylked has at least some positives going for it. The female in the scene is laying under a table. She is fully nude, sometimes she is masturbating and most of these models are at worst, cute. Every scene is the same. The female model is laying under the table while a dick is sticking through a hole in the table. The female rubs the dick, she sucks it, she masturbates herself while doing it. It’s similar to a gloryhole scene except the model is laying down instead of on her knees.
The 65 scenes can all be downloaded in 1080p which is another sign this is a newer site on the network and possibly damages the view of several of the other sites on the network where 480p and 720p are the highest quality downloads. All scenes on all the sites in the network only have one download option. The scenes even on Mylked are very short with less than 10 minutes being common.
I felt this site earned a review with the attractiveness of the models compared to the other sites in the network. These may be pro models even. Jessica Marie, Freya Von Doom, Honey Hayes and Reina Ryder are the 4 newest models. I don’t recognize them or their names, but they are attractive (pretty or cute), they have nice bodies that they show off while pleasuring the dick sticking through the table.
In comparison to the other sites on the network, these models are much more attractive. I rarely go into attractiveness in reviews unless just saying pretty models. I feel like a lot of the models on this network would be turn offs for viewers. I can’t say I have experienced that on a network before, not on this scale.
The pictures on Mylked are also much better than on the other sites on this network. There are around 100 photos in each set and while it does look like they are screen captures, they show different angles than the video shows. I said this in a previous review of another site on this network, I don’t know if this is a negative or positive. It’s a site I joined to watch dicks being teased and pleasured. I ended up finding my favorite site of the network, Mylked, shows more of the female and I’m not a lesbian. There has to be a bigger picture at work here. The attractiveness of the models on Mylked make the scenes more enjoyable and there’s irony in that. This is the one site on their network the male can’t see the pretty woman pleasuring him. The other sites have the “average at best” female models right in the men’s view. This site, as much as I liked it -- possibly because of how much I disliked the overall network, is still repetitive and small. I do believe if you check out Mylked, I don’t know how much the preview shows of the models and also Shady Spa, if you think you would like either or both of those sites this network is worth joining for the discounted price. I believe if you don’t think Mylked and Shady Spa would interest you, the network as a whole won’t interest you. There are some good scenes on Club Tug, but they are 480p. I will end with while reviewing Mylked, I clicked “switch sites” and they have a different add-on showing up that you have to pay extra for, Mylked’s “switch sites” tab has “Gloryhole (unlock)” in it. When I was reviewing Shady Spa and Cum Blast City, the “switch sites” tab had “Tug Spy” or Spy Tug (unlock). If I were them, I would work on improving the content they have instead of possibly starting other new sites they don’t offer with their network. I mention this because their newest site, Edge Queens, was locked from me accessing it for nearly a week.
This network is a mess. Mylked is a good site as long as you accept every scene is going to be similar. I am giving it an 80 for the pretty models who do a good job of showing off their bodies while pleasuring the male. |
|
05-11-21 05:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
207
|
Creampie Angels
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the more impressive sites on this network.
Probably their best collection of models on any of their sites.
Currently 225 scenes with a new scene being added each month.
Believable, maybe even passionate sex.
Decent variety in settings including some outdoors.
The only ads are at the bottom of the screen in the members area. The site has a clean, neat, interface to it and works well. |
| Cons: |
Being from India, I’m not really into creampie porn. It would take ages to explain.
Even though this looks to be one of the network’s top sites the video quality didn’t go above 720p until 2014-15. |
| Bottom Line: |
I would have scored this site 5 points higher if it wasn’t a creampie site. I’m just not into creampies, but do like cumshots so I think a 5 point deduction is fair since they are replacing one of my favorite parts with a part I don’t like.
The models on this site are as pretty, sexy and into the sex as any on this network. And it’s consistently the case. I do wonder if anyone has questioned if they have any fake cum in the creampie parts as some of them do not look real. It looks like someone took a can of whipped cream and squirted it in the woman. I can’t say I have experienced fluffy cum.
The scenes total 225, there is a video and photo set with each. Both are downloadable and it’s unlimited downloading. The streaming player works well too if you like to stream scenes before downloading them. There still isn’t much story to any of these scenes. You’re getting mostly sex with the guy cumming inside the woman. There is a good amount of emotions from the actors and that helps my view of it and Eastern European porn too.
The variety here is mostly from the setting. They have a few outdoor scenes. There are some in the bathtub/shower and they break away from the same bed setting a lot of their sites seem to be stuck on using. The models also show some diversity, not really ethnically, but they do have some very fair complexion redheads, a lot of brunettes and some blondes. The guys in these scenes are a little more attractive than their “teen” guys. I would like to see bigger, more muscular guys in these types of scenes since I see creampie as a power/control niche of sex and porn. I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite site on the network, but I could see people saying it’s the best site on the network.
I don’t really understand the video quality difference on this site. Their highest quality download up until 2015 was 720p, they added 1080p in 2015 until 2016, in 2016 they added 4K. That is not a major problem for me, but thought it should be mentioned since it seems like they would have 1080p before 2015, otherwise, it's a good site. |
|
09-28-20 10:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
208
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone. |
| Cons: |
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men. |
| Bottom Line: |
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price. |
|
09-28-20 08:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
209
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A terrific site for many women’s favorite fantasies.
Great looking men and women.
Nice video quality as all scenes are in HD.
Excellent photo sets with one for each video.
Vendo is a very trusted biller.
Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites that I liked. |
| Cons: |
No discount through Porn Users. I recommend looking around on the internet for a better price.
Too small and not updating. I want more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a complaint about Teen Mega World. They start sites that I love and then stop updating them. Dirty Doctor has only 38 HD scenes and they stopped adding new ones in 2017 and in 2016 they had only one new update.
What a shame. Dirty Doctor has a lot going for it. To begin with, it is a fantasy come alive for me and many other women. My gynecologist is gorgeous and getting naked for him makes me so hot. He is all business, but I always leave his office feeling like I need to take care of my business when I get home.
The doctors on the site are some of the best older men I have seen in porn. There are several niches featured on Dirty Doctor and one is old and younger. Another is the uniform fetish, as the doctors look the role. There is even a scene where a nurse in uniform “works” along with the doctor.
I wish the scenes were in English as that would add a lot. In the opening of the story, a young lady enters her doctor’s office. They talk for a few moments and I wish I knew what they were talking about. Next she goes behind a partition and she strips. Why? She is about to show him all her intimate parts but she is shy? Then he does the usual doctor things like a pap smear or inserts a speculum. He looks down her throat and she says ah. He has her spread wide in stirrups.
But there is a twist. He breaks every rule regarding sex with his patients. When he gives her a pap smear, he also sticks his fingers inside and stimulates her. He rubs her clit. After he takes the speculum out, he inserts his cock. When he looks down her throat and then takes out the stick, he puts his other hard stick in. When she is spread out in the stirrups, he uses a vibrator on her. In one scene he inserts anal beads while he is massaging her clit. OMG. I need a doctor like this.
In a few scenes, he acts like he is enjoying this, but in most it is played deadpan as if this was routine and normal in a doctor’s office visit. In one scene he has her bend over so he can check her out from behind. He suddenly becomes a clown and makes gestures as if this was a comedy being played out for the audience.
When she leaves he sometimes gives her some medication. I don’t know if he helped her with her “condition” but he sure helped me with mine.
I have seen some of these models before, so I expect these are pros. I am not familiar enough with European models to know who they are. You also get a huge, 34 site teen network as part of your join price. I would give this a 90, but the small number of videos is a big negative in an otherwise near perfect site. |
|
09-28-20 08:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
210
|
Nylons X
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fresh looking young teen models both male and female
Nylons. Need I say more?
Vendo is the biller and is easy to use.
Photo set for each video.
Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites.
The videos are about a half hour each. |
| Cons: |
Archive site that last updated in 2012
Only 32 videos.
Only three download choices. HD at 1280x720 and the other two are SD. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first joined Teen Mega World, I did not notice this site as it is so small. There are 34 other teen sites included in the network, so you get a lot more than just this one.
I have joined a lot of nylons and hose sites as that is a particular fetish of mine. Here you see fresh faced young models, both young ladies and teen guys that I have never seen before. These scenes are very polished and professionally shot, but the models are not your everyday pornstars. Many of these girls are very thin and need to eat a bit more for dinner than only these cocks, despite them looking quite delicious. The guys are not great in the looks department and their cocks vary from just ok size to a little too small. If that is all you notice, then this site is not for you. This site shows believable teen couples enjoying sex that is more interesting than the usual porn site has to offer.
In each scene these teen girls wear colored hose, opaques and sometimes fishnets. These make for some sexy scenes with the best part being that their legs turn on their partners. I wish they would talk, but I don’t think they speak English. They do speak the language of lust, sex appeal and some raw heat.
Since the site has only 32 videos and a photo set for each, I was left feeling that there should be more. A few scenes are masturbation only, but most can only be called hardcore. I prefer my sites to be a little more kinky, but it is fine as it is. It is mostly just the usual in and out. He puts it there or there and she enjoys it.
There is no discount for joining through Pornusers, but discounts can be found rather easily. The site is worth joining and I feel it has a lot to like about it.
On its own I like it enough for a score of about 80. However, there is a lot of added value in the Teen Mega World network, one of the best there is. |
|
09-11-20 09:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
211
|
Ersties
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly amateur models in solo, male/female, lesbian, group scenes.
Some of the women are very attractive. There is more of a natural look going on here.
Bills through Epoch.
Daily updates and good tagging system.
The solo scenes and especially outdoors solo are the best scenes on here for me.
If you like the site a lot, the 3 month deal for $45 is a good deal. |
| Cons: |
If you are hesitant and only join for one month, it's going to set you back $35.
Besides the tagging system, the overall navigation is not user-friendly and is confusing.
The much hyped "playdate" feature is a free cam show until the model decides you have to pay to see more. Kind of like Chaturbate.
I was attracted to the real couples chemistry aspect of their advertising, they have more solo scenes than male/female, lesbian, threesomes and orgies combined.
I'm straight, maybe bi-curious at times and found none of the men attractive.
Scenes are split for no particular reason.
I also don't care for the whimsical, pastel, layout of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems to be a very polarizing site. A brief thought on that, I do like some of the content. I especially found the model Anya to be very attractive and sensual in her newest scene.
After that, a lot of the problems come from what is a business model I don't appreciate. Besides charging $35 for 1 month, there's the Playdate feature that they heavily advertise. If you go to the model list, the first 3 blocks are upcoming Playdates. These are live so you have to be online when they have it. I was able to make it to a recent one. Each one has the words, "Free Live Show" on it. I signed in to watch and was taken to a screen that said:
There are three types of playdates
#1 Free Playdates:
These playdates are open, varied and influenced by you, the viewer! If you want the opportunity to determine the course of the playdate, then make sure you have some Ersties Coins added to your account!
#2 Ticket Playdates:
These shows will be prepared by the Ersties Models themselves, allowing you a front row seat as the models indulge the naughty exhibitionist side of their kinky personality.
Tickets can be purchased in advance of the show using coins from your membership account.
#3 Private Playdates:
If you enjoy an Ersties Playdate and want to get the model a little more intimately, you can invite them to a private 1-on-1 playdate!
If a model offers 1-on-1 playdates, this will be displayed at the bottom of this page.
The tokens or coins cost anywhere from 90 for $15 to 960 for $150. Isn't that just like any cam show? They also have Ersties Cams.
I do believe that's important to the review since you are not told you will have to buy tokens to interact with these Playdates. I wouldn't be as negative about it if they didn't also have Ersties Cams. It makes Playdates look like it's something different.
The site itself, they do solo porn well, but they do have the scenes cut into parts. These parts are not used to switch outfits or locations. One of the recent scenes, a woman lays on the couch and masturbates. The scene stops, the next part of the scene, she is bent over the chair masturbating right beside the couch she was on. She didn't even put her clothes back on.
There are interviews on every scene and they are a separate video. They don't list the number of interviews (no tag for it), but this is what they do list: 639 solo scenes, 384 lesbian scenes, 59 boy/girl, 26 threesomes, 9 orgies. These numbers are not determinations of how many of those scenes they have since most have multiple parts. For instance: Mona and Vanessa In Action 1, Mona and Vanessa In Action 2. Just like the solo scene described above, these two videos are in the same location. It gets halfway through the full scene and stops, then you have to go find part 2 of it. They do not always release them back to back. For instance: Layla and Mae In Action 1 was released and Layla and Mae In Action 2 had 16 other scenes released between In Layla and Mae In Action 1 and Layla and Mae In Action 2.
A lot of the lesbian scenes are good, but who knows how many parts I'm going to miss when my membership expires? They have a Christmas lesbian anal scene that has 4 parts. It looks like the 3rd part came out about six weeks ago, in March.
I do like that they're exploring more into public scenes. I really enjoyed the Rebecca In Action 1 scene of a pretty model masturbating on a train. They also have a lesbian library scene that I liked a lot.
If they start doing more of these risky scenes, it will at least give me interest in coming back, maybe even for 3 months. I also like their group/orgy scenes. A few other notes I've seen advertised include BDSM. They have 15 BDSM scenes and those are split, making it more like 7 or 8.
The navigation is a problem because they group lesbians together, then list them separate if they have a solo scene. Clicking on the scene does show all their scenes, solo, lesbian, etc, but there's no way to figure out how many models they have since one model could be listed solo, then again in lesbian. The scenes can't be counted since most of them have multiple parts to one scene.
I'm not really into or against "natural" models, but in the tags there are 606 scenes listed with shaved pubic hair, 310 with trimmed pubic hair and 230 listed as hairy.
There's something that just doesn't feel right about their advertising. With that said, the scenes overall are okay and would possibly be very good if they didn't split them. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
The best way to finish this up is my membership is about to expire. They released an interview of Caireen and Mirah, it also has a scene of them showering together and Caireen going down on Mirah, but that's In Action 1. Which means I won't likely have my membership when In Action 2 comes out. It's like watching a soap opera or television series. Maybe a longer membership would be the answer? It's an average site with potential for me. |
|
04-19-20 02:40am
Replies (4)
|
Review
212
|
Strapon Tales
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Narrow niche content of women using dildos on men.
124 scenes, they seem to be recycling these. It’s still a high number for a limited niche.
Uses CCBill
Downloadable videos and screencaps.
This niche has two or maybe three different styles to it. This one leans towards the role-reversal side.
Easy to navigate as a whole. |
| Cons: |
I was told when a site has scenes that are showing up as their newest scenes and they are only 480p, but they have scenes from 3-4 years ago that are 720p, they are recycling and that’s what this site has. The newest update is listed as 2/1/2020 and it’s 480p.
Poor downloading options, most videos only have one resolution to download.
Screencap downloads are small in resolution and in quantity of photos (less than 30). |
| Bottom Line: |
This niche is done best by Kink’s Divine Bitches. I was told to check this network out (Ferro) and that it has multiple pegging sites (women using dildos on men). This one falls under the sub-niche of role-reversal style. The couples seem to be in regular gender roles, kissing, groping each other, then the woman comes up with the idea of using a dildo on the guy. She doesn’t pressure him or dominate him. He goes along with it and it looks like a loving couple just exploring their sexuality with each other. I will review a couple of their other ones that do the other styles.
I have two reasons to think they are recycling. Newer videos have lower resolutions than older videos and the TBP 2015 review listed over 170 scenes on this site. There are only 124 scenes on it now in 2020. My guess is they’ve moved some of the scenes to their other pegging sites or possibly are recycling from site to site.
I know that’s a major con, but it is a very rare niche and for someone into it, it’s better than nothing. The best video quality I have seen on here is 720p and have seen more 480p. This sub-niche is my least favorite style of pegging. It’s like two loving people having dildo up the man’s ass sex. It doesn’t mesh well to me. I feel like if a married couple was into that it would be great for them but doubt, they would go around telling everyone.
The positive for me is it’s still an underrepresented niche and besides the lower video quality, the scenes are mostly 20 minutes or shorter. Most of these scenes are only in the 200MB file size. You can build a collection of these very quickly. I would rate the couples as “okay” attractive. It does lend to the feeling that maybe these are real couples. I scored it a little higher than I probably should since I do like the niche and the ease of use of the site. |
|
02-02-20 09:56am
Replies (0)
|
Review
213
|
She's New
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The 295 models here are supposed to be new to porn.
There are 262 scenes.
Downloadable videos, photos and screencaps.
Biller is Epoch
Videos often are in the hour long range, some are less, even as short as 30 minutes.
Very attractive, young models.
No clear update schedule, but they do update it. So far in January they only have 1 update, in December they had 5, in November they had 1. It at least has a decent sized archive of videos to hold you over for new releases. |
| Cons: |
I think the basis of the site might be a con. It says Only First Timers on each scene, maybe it means it’s their first-time filming with them? I have seen several of the models before.
There’s not much story or even purpose other than it’s supposed to be the models first scene. It’s very formulaic. The sex isn’t bad, and the attractiveness of the models makes the story less important. It’s kind of like watching casting porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site’s popularity has to be because of the looks of the models. They’re all comfortably in the 18-22 range, most are thin, but there are a few bustier ones. The finger in the mouth, “I’m innocent” look is common here. The models are more likely to catch your eye than the plots. Most of the scenes start like a casting type scene. The model talks and answers questions for about 7-12 minutes, she then strips and teases for 5-8 minutes, then the sex starts, and it becomes very formulaic from there. I’m not familiar with some of these models, but there are at least half of them that I have seen on other sites.
The download options are easy to use, and all scenes have 1080p, 720p, 576p, 480p and mobile options. You can download the photo sets and if you like, you can download the screenshots too.
There’s come credit due on the interview portions of the videos. The models do a good job of playing innocent, excited, anxious and often give quick upskirts or upshort views. They have playful attitudes towards the questions, and I found myself enjoying these interviews as much as the formulaic sex.
Beyond that, I didn’t like this site as much as I thought I would. Maybe I’m just burning out on the casting style sites? It’s definitely not the fault of the models. There are some really cute and really pretty models here. It’s just a style a porn I think we’ve been overloaded with. How many more models are going to be shocked to see an 8” dick? |
|
01-27-20 08:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
214
|
Tricky Old Teacher
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Old and young niche plus teacher and student niche.
There are 237 scenes. Each has a video and downloadable photos.
Includes 30 other sites with several having the old and young niche.
Newest videos include the option to download in 4K.
Streaming player works above average.
Network is easy to use and each site is even easier to use with some faults.
Mostly average to cute looking models. |
| Cons: |
It looks like there is a way to search by each sites models, but it doesn't work when I do it. It just shows all the models for all their sites.
It looks like they update once a month.
Few of these sites are that strong by themselves, but as a whole the network is pretty good.
Video quality can be inconsistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
My moods towards porn change often. I was looking for old and young porn, a more common theme in real sex in my home country. I saw several sites on this network that have the old and young theme. I think if you like that niche joining this network is a good choice. They have at least 4 old and young sites on the network. In my experience, a site with 250+ scenes is doing pretty good.
The theme here doesn't always work out how I would have preferred. I like the in classroom scenes, but a lot of these are older tutor goes to younger students house to help them with their homework and they have sex. Some scenes are outdoors too. The sexual parts are as good as any of the older with younger niche scenes I've seen. There's not much story or dialogue. The girls seem to be as much if not more into the scenes than the men are. Maybe that's part of the niche? The men seem surprised the young, cute models are attracted to them.
One of the newest scenes has a 4K option, 1080p, 720, 480p and 360p options as well. If you go back 4 pages into the updates, 8 pages total, you will start finding obscure resolutions like 468p and 286p and those are the best options for the second half of the content. It looks like this site has been around a long time and they just update very slowly.
The content is good for the niche. The men are as energetic as they can be. Some of the men are not in that "really old" group. They look more like 40's, maybe 50's. Some of the others look 60's and 70's. The female models look 18-24, most are slim, small built and are very poor actresses!
The amount of content between this site and the other older/younger sites on the network make it a good buy in my opinion. |
|
01-13-20 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
215
|
Active Duty
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Military-themed gay site that also has some very good solo male videos.
Updates 5 times per month (includes remasters and compilations)
Some of the guys look the part of the masculine male military stereotype.
High-definition downloads for videos and photos.
Biggest selection of gay models I have seen with around 700.
Large site with over 1,600 scenes. |
| Cons: |
The theme doesn’t work for me.
No 4K, it is owned by Gamma, but maybe length of scenes stops the 4K downloads? Most scenes are over 30 minutes.
Not enough solo scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was recommended to me by a Porn Users member that used to regularly review gay sites. I wasn’t really for sure what to expect when I saw the military theme. That’s how the site works, too. One scene, the guys act very serious and military. The next scene, it seems more like a parody of the military. Can you get anymore parodying than two guys having doggy style on a bed while saluting the flag? I do know this theme is well-liked by gay men. It’s not that I was offended or anything like that. I just thought the change from scene to scene needed to be ironed out some. A little more consistency and either way would be fine with me.
That is a common problem I have on gay male sites. The scenes between guys don’t do much for me. Except the first 5 minutes and last minute. The guys, over 700 of them, are mostly attractive, but there is a lot of differences in their body language and believability about being gay. Most of these are quite convincing.
The solo scenes are easily my favorite and the main reason I join gay sites. This site seems to stray from the Gamma style of sites. The search works, but you only need to click one or two pages to see it’s not very accurate. I search for solo and there are 36 pages of 16 videos that show up. On the second page there are guys having sex. I believe the number of solo scenes is safe to say 250-300. This site has been around so long, some of those are dated 2001. You don’t get the Gamma quality on the videos. The resolution on the older ones has a steep drop-off. I know it’s still updating, but this seems like a site that should come with something else. I know it’s a huge site, but when you figure in the older scenes being very low quality in video resolution, it just looks like they could add this to one or two of their other gay sites. There was a feeling of I spent more money than I received quality videos. That is unusual in the gay genre. Usually you don’t get updates, but the quality is better.
What I noticed the most was the guys in the older scenes are more masculine and there’s more solo in the older scenes. I don’t know if they maybe changed their focus at some point over the last 22 years. I also feel like the site should be larger than it is. The older videos, besides being low video quality, are really short. One I downloaded was 4 minutes. There’s no real consistency in anything on this site except the military theme which does nothing for me. They have one solo video that’s 4 minutes then it goes to a solo video that is nearly 30 minutes. Why didn’t they put them in the room together?
What I am trying to say is I believe the theme is the big draw. I do think this site would score higher for a gay man that is into this theme. And that’s probably why I feel like there should be more. A network gives you multiple themes. You’re just stuck with this one theme. I don’t mean for this to be a negative review. It’s just I may need to stay away from themed gay porn.
The newest videos have from mobile to 1080p downloads. You can download the pictures which are high quality for a gay site. That also makes me think the theme is a major part of the interest in this site. I can still rate it well for doing what it’s supposed to do. Just don’t expect it to go outside the theme. I don’t know that I would recommend it if you don’t like the theme. |
|
04-11-22 07:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
216
|
Met Art X
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pretty solo site that does a lot right but isn’t without some subjective flaws.
I am not usually as into solo female porn as some, but this was offered in a promo, and I came away with a similar feeling I expected to have.
The site is large and has a new update each day. The sites on the Met-Art Network release photos separate from videos and number them. Not for sure how I feel about this practice.
There is some variety in models, but it’s not a lot. Most of these models are pretty, slim, white.
Videos are unlimited downloadable and there are downloadable photo zips. |
| Cons: |
Camerawork and music in scenes. The camerawork is a major one for me to be convinced of the models’ orgasm.
This site unlike the other on this network that I just reviewed, splits the photos and videos up as separate updates but updates them on back-to-back days. Their other site spreads those out.
Most of my complaints on this site are going to be from me believing the visuals of the woman’s pussy is crucial to seeing how it reacts to orgasm, the camerawork has problems there and some of the women also close their legs in what is supposed to be the orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find myself highly critical of solo masturbation sites. One of my regular practices is teaching women to orgasm without physical stimulation. This requires contractions and teasing of the vaginal vestibule or introitus. This, likely is not something porn wants to talk about since it explains the absurdity behind “size matters”. Think of all those 12 inch dick unemployed men walking around with nothing more than a visual stimulant.
These scenes are incredibly straightforward and do lack a lot of the creativity I would like to see in a solo female scene. Also, not all of the scenes include masturbation, which I thought was the point of this being Met Art X. A 22 minute scene of a woman dancing around nude does not constitute porn. It doesn’t even equal tease porn. It is more like watching a ballet or artistic performance.
Once into the masturbation scenes, some have soft music, which doesn’t bother me as much as others. I know some feel this blocks out the moans and noises from the female, but you can hear those and the music is very soft. I watched numerous scenes that did this: Camera explicitly focused on the pussy as the woman masturbates, then as she starts to writhe, twist and look like an orgasm is nearing, the camera moves to a view of her from the side. I know this is explicit and maybe shows how much I am interested in the female orgasm, but I usually can watch the vaginal vestibule and tell when a woman is having an orgasm. A lot of these more glam sites choose to remove the camera from seeing that. I believe it hurts the scenes a lot. Several scenes I was very much into just lost me with the camera choosing to show the side view of the woman during what was supposed to be an orgasm. There is a reason male cumshot compilation videos are popular. Seeing another person, either gender, orgasm, can and often will bring on orgasm for the person viewing. This site would score much higher if they fixed that one part with the camera changing during orgasm.
The site is large with 1,156 videos, 970 picture sets, only 345 models, but these do seem to be top-level models. I imagine they pull popular models from their other sites to this one. The update rate is very good and there are up to 4K downloads on the videos with 6 other options, also downloadable picture sets. For an overall good package. I made a comment over a year ago about not understanding why porn with tattooed models believed it had to be as violent and hardcore as possible. I will make a similar comment here. Why not show the explicit orgasm? If the model is okay with being videoed explicitly while masturbating, shouldn’t she be okay with showing her orgasm? I may even be being a little harsh with my score, but that camera movement during the orgasm ruins the scenes for me. |
|
01-12-22 05:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
217
|
Dud Cast
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Routine, casting-type site
Currently is updating 6 times a month
“Amateur” models (I recognize several of them) that I believe are speaking Russian
Subtitles for the talking parts
Multiple camera angles for good or bad
Videos are 1080p or 720p and are downloadable
Most of the models are young and cute |
| Cons: |
The multiple camera angles sometimes messes up the view
No 4K (possibly recycling?)
I never figured out the “dud” part
A model with as known of a name as Gina Gerson is on this site, but they don’t even list her by name until the description of the scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
This came with Doc Squirt and I believe the XFeeds.net site also gives access to the same sites. This one does make me wonder about the new updates. Longtime PU members have talked about the video quality often pointing to older videos being recycled. Most of the sites in this small network have a 4K video option, but this one doesn’t, yet they show 6 new updates over the last month. I will review the XFeeds.net site separately as it shows the full list of problems these potentially good sites are having.
I would like an explanation on the “dud” part of the name. I was expecting something along the lines of guys that were having trouble keeping it up or ones that started having performance anxiety. Also, with the way they show the site “her first time”, I was expecting female models that were hesitant, maybe even believably shy, but what I got was a normal casting site with an older man (maybe he’s the dud?), casting younger women and they do try to add a story of them talking the model into the scene. The older man doesn’t have sex with all of the models. He sometimes has a guy he calls his “nephew” also in the scenes. One scene I watched ended with the older casting man, simply known as “agent”, say, “You both were great” where’s the dud?
This is also not a large site. It’s quite small with 36 scenes. I do think that puts more emphasis on the importance of whether those “new” scenes are really new or not. The scenes may even go too much into a story, which I’m usually complaining there’s not enough of. The scenes are under 30 minutes and you can expect 10 of those minutes to be the setup. Some of the scenes just read like (from the translated subtitles) they picked a hooker up. One of the women says her cost is 800 Euros per day. I’m not for sure anything can get lost in that translation.
The videos even without 4K are very clear in the 1080p format. The camera angles are probably done for effect, but I don’t see any major benefit from them. They have one camera angle from the ceiling that looks like a security cam view. There’s the older agent guy carrying a handheld camera and there does seem to be at least one other camera view. There isn’t much bouncing camera which is why I believe there’s another camera. It’s not full point-of-view even when the agent is the one having sex. It’s not a bad site, but the group of sites combined, even the discount here on Porn Users, still feels underwhelming. |
|
02-09-21 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
218
|
That Sitcom Show
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I love parody porn.
Only 44 scenes, but I downloaded them all.
Video quality is very good on all of the scenes.
The pictures give an interesting view of the “actors” and show how much or how little the porn actors look like the original stars of the shows. They can be downloaded.
CCBill is the biller.
Comes with Nubile Films and Hot Crazy Mess. |
| Cons: |
Most of these shows make for good porn parodies, but Beaver?
No longer updating.
Considering they are parodies there’s not much story. |
| Bottom Line: |
Being a longtime fan of Vivid, I have watched a lot of porn parodies of movies over the years, but haven’t seen a lot of parodies of television shows. I recognized all of the shows. Most of these were on television when I first moved to the United States. These are the series they have:
Two Men and a XXX Show, Big Bang, Friends With Benefits, Threesome Company, Married With Issues, That 70’s Ho, Facts of Lust, Cumming With The Connors and Leave It To Mom’s Beaver. They also have one that I think is supposed to be their own they made up called The Exchange Student.
One of the strengths or weaknesses is they use the same models for each role in each series. These models are some of the top models in porn like Emily Willis. She’s on multiple shows in different roles. The outfits, the settings, the way the models talk are at least close to the original shows. I didn’t know Facts of Lust, but found the original show on youtube.
I do think the stories could have been longer and better. I can look over the acting, but when you make a parody it seems like the story should at least be similar to what the original series or movie was. It’s also a small site with only 44 videos and no new updates.
The scenes they do have come with 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p and 1080p download options. The pictures are a part of the site you don’t want to miss. Those can be downloaded in huge 5760x3840 resolution or the smaller 2000x1333 and 1200x800 resolutions. These pictures remove the poor acting and minimal story. I thought the model that looked closest to the real character she portrayed was Jennifer White as the wife on Married With Issues. One of the guys in that series also looks a lot like the brother.
I would like to see more of these and hope maybe some studio will try the parodies again with storylines similar to the real ones on the shows. The site is now included with Nubile Films and makes the package of sites you get a very good value. |
|
10-05-20 09:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
219
|
Strapon Power
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pure femdom strap-on action with women dominating men.
Only 60 scenes, but this is the rarest sub-niche of the pegging niche.
About half of the videos have 720p
More photo sets than videos, maybe the guys asked the videos to be removed? This network also has a site called Strap-On Sissies that is very similar. I think they moved some of the videos from here to it.
CCBill is the reliable biller. |
| Cons: |
I don’t think most men would enjoy this style of porn at all.
Should just be mixed with Strap-On Sissies, a nearly identical site on the network.
Updates seem to be recycled older scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Have you ever watched some hulking man in porn manhandle a little teen woman and force his dick up her ass while she screams? This is the payback! It’s not as hardcore or harsh as some I’ve seen, but what you have here are female models that stick 10 inch dildos up men’s asses, with more than a few of the scenes being the man lying on his back with his butt up in the air as the woman drives the dildo up his ass.
I typically don’t care for this sub-niche of pegging, but because they’re not as harsh here as I have seen, it’s really not bad. Usually in this sub-niche the woman will do nothing for the man and won’t let him touch her. She usually won’t even give him a reason to think he’s going to get anything except the abuse she hands out. There’s a little more allowing the men to touch the women here. Not much in the way of letting him get off until she tells him he can.
One of the most common themes on this site is the woman making the man dress up like a woman and she pelts him with “bitch” and yanks his wig. Being truthful even if it makes me look mean and bad, it’s kind of funny. I keep waiting on the woman to rip his wig off after forcing him to put it on.
This is not for everyone. It might not even be for hardly anyone, unless you can take a sense of humor into it. It’s clear these men could stop the woman and most of these women are quite attractive. Some of the women even look very uncomfortable in their newfound role of dominance. Some even look like they feel bad for the guy. They should record after the scene videos. I am sure most of these women apologized to the guys. Recycling aside, it’s very rare niche content I wouldn’t have found anywhere else. Sometimes I think this type of narrow niche porn is a welcome change to the common scenes we see on other sites. I will add this part for those into this sub-niche of pegging, their site Strap-on Sissies has over 125 scenes and it’s the exact sub-niche of Strap-On Power. And those come in the same network so if this is up your alley, they have close to 200 scenes of the female dominating the man and even making him dress up like a woman. |
|
02-02-20 10:04am
Replies (1)
|
Review
220
|
Priya Rai Official
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All the videos are in High Definition and are exclusive
There are 71 sites in the Puba Network
Downloads are fast
I'm always interested in models from India |
| Cons: |
Videos are not dated
I think that the site is no longer adding new content. With only 52 videos it is just too small
No interaction with her fans on the site, but there is a link to her Twitter account
I don’t like that she has implants and uses too much makeup
Not enough straight or lesbian sex |
| Bottom Line: |
There are very few Indian women who make porn, as it is illegal there. The women who are pornstars live in other countries, such as the UK, Canada or the United States. Priya was born in New Delhi, but was adopted by an American couple and raised as an American. What we have in common is that I was also born in India, but I am an American by choice.
Before becoming a porn star, she was a lingerie and swimwear model, then a stripper for 12 years. She is comfortable showing her body and is best on this site in her solo scenes. For six years she was a major pornstar and won industry awards for best new starlet, best group sex scene and later in her career for best MILF. She retired for six years and when she decided on a comeback, it was to create this website.
I can only assume she did not have the rights to her earlier huge catalog of scenes, as the ones here were made in more recent years. She was in her forties when she opened the site. She fell into a common strategy among older models and has implants and uses too much makeup. Some women age well and some honestly just don’t. I feel that her videos here are not comparable to her videos from years ago.
Here she has 52 videos and photo sets. Since the review by Rabbits Reviews in April 2019, the site has added only one video and one photo set. The updates don’t say when they were posted, so I think the site is not still growing. There is no interaction with her on the site, but there is a link to her Twitter account.
A few scenes are boy/girl, a few even show foot jobs, lesbian or are mutual masturbation, but most are of her alone. She uses fingers, dildos, vibrators and toys as well as a sybian and a rocking chair. I have never seen one of those on a porn site. Her range of abilities and sexual appetite don’t shine through as she doesn’t have enough scenes with partners.
The site is rather simple and uncomplicated and every video is in High Definition, but none are 4K. There are more photo sets than videos, but they were just ok. I am not into photos and would not care much anyway. I was not sure what to expect when I logged onto the site for the first time. But after spending time on the site, I do feel she could have done better. |
|
09-07-21 05:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
221
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Rare, at least to me, amateur porn from India. I am from India.
Pretty models wearing traditional Indian clothes and jewelry
It feels like a con, but 158 scenes of authentic amateur porn from India is a lot.
Long scenes with most being over 30 minutes.
Maybe it’s the amateur part, but there’s more kissing, touching, and build-up than most hardcore scenes I’ve watched recently. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure the appeal, even the taboo of these scenes are evident to those not from India.
While these are older scenes, it seems like the video quality should be better than 480p tops.
No pictures, would have been interesting to see more of the clothing, jewelry to see all the taboos being touched on.
I am putting this as a con even though I see it as a pro. There are cumshots, facials, the site is listed as creampie. |
| Bottom Line: |
Finding porn from with real amateurs from India is not easy to do. You can find solo models from India on some of the more glamour sites, but hardcore, in traditional Indian clothing, is what I’m going to call very rare.
This is an older site with no updates, but I hadn’t ever seen it. If you look online you will see how rare any Indian porn is. Finding a site with 158 scenes is not really exciting, but more intriguing. One complaint that really jumps out at me. The women -- possibly being “amateurs” look at the camera way too much. Even in cowgirl position, looking back over their shoulder at the camera. I would even call that distracting from the scenes. I would have liked pictures too. While you can see the women’s clothing and jewelry at the beginning of the scenes they do not stay dressed very long. A lot of the taboo potential has to do with the clothing being on while at least some sexual act is being performed.
I cannot tell you if all these models really are from India. There are several different subcultures of Indian people. A few of the models do look more Romany to me. And we will have a geographical, racial argument discussion on our hands if we get into whether Romany people are Indian -- the Romany are officially considered Aryan-Indo.
The sex itself is quite good. There’s kissing, it’s very inspiring to see an Indian woman grabbing a hard penis while kissing a man. Traditional ways in India put the woman in the extreme submissive role. I do get the feeling most of these women are amateurs and one big reason I say that is they look confused, maybe uncomfortable if they guy pulls out to give them a facial. They do not open their mouths and turn their faces to the side. The men do not look to be Indian, at least not all of them. At least a few of the scenes are even titled, “White Boys and Indians”. This doesn’t really matter either way to me. It does bring another part into question, most of these women have trimmed pubic hair, that’s not really common in India, but I also notice very few tattoos, which is more common in India.
It would help if the women talked. I could tell if they were speaking Hindi. There’s not much talking, but there is a lot of moaning and the sex itself is the strongest part of the site. It’s very believable for porn.
From what I can tell these scenes are taken from DVDs. They are numbered with the same title like, “White Boys and Indians scene #1”. That does mean the quality of the video is not even average in 2021. They give you four download options from 160p to 480p. The 480p is really better watched in a media player that has a “large” mode or one that lets you select the percentage of your monitor’s screen the video fills. I found using PotPlayer, a media player I hadn’t heard of before, works best with the 480p. You can set it to fill 50% or 75% of your screen giving you a bigger resolution than 480p, but not trying to stretch it out to 1080p.
I believe my opinion on this site is probably a little too high since I understand the taboos and know the rarity of finding this many hardcore Indian scenes on one site. I am still limiting my score. I like it more than my score shows. If you are interested in women from India it is definitely worth checking out. If you’re not into women from India, you probably won’t make it beyond the poor resolution quality of the videos. |
|
07-13-21 09:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
222
|
VIP 4K
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A “network” of 13 sites all filmed in very high quality.
Vendo is their biller. I like that Vendo remembers my email and password and shows me all their sites I have active memberships with and lets me cancel any or all of them from one screen. (This could be a bad sign that this is a major pro).
The scenes are of good length, averaging over 30 minutes each, but there is very little story.
All scenes have 4K download option and some even have a downloadable subtitle file which I really like and would like to see other sites include a subtitle file. It’s a SRT file.
Navigation is simple, interface is clean and fluid. The videos are crisp even in the 1080p and 720p versions. |
| Cons: |
Possibly the best example I have seen of “this shouldn’t be marketed as a network”.
No model list, no way to find other scenes of models you like (unclickable names), no tags
The action in the scenes is hit or miss based on whether you like the niche. They do have some cuckold scenes I enjoyed.
Not all scenes have photos and no dates on the scenes.
My last pro listed is very important as is the third con. They are doing nearly everything right except there is a lot of cookie-cutter feel to most of the scenes. A sameness from scene to scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought this was going to be a network I could get 3-5 reviews from, but I’m only doing this one. Calling this a network is like calling a department store, a mall. I will list the sites in the network and how many scenes each has.
Black 4K has 12 scenes, Daddy 4K has 16 scenes, Debt 4K has 13 scenes, Hunt 4K has 24 scenes, Law 4K has 7 scenes, Loan 4K has 15 scenes, Old 4K has 12 scenes, Rim 4K has 13 scenes, Sis has 12 scenes, Tutor 4K has 7 scenes, Stuck 4K has 11 scenes, Fist 4K has 9 scenes and Mature 4K has 10 scenes.
That means this 13 site network has a total of 168 scenes. One could even complain that Daddy 4K and Old 4K are the same niche. I have reviewed sites that are not huge, but according to the information on TBP this network launched in 2018. That was 2-3 years ago. How can a network of 13 sites only average 55 new scenes per year? Maybe I am being a little hard on the network? But when you don’t list dates on your scenes and you have a very small amount of content relative to the number of “sites” you have on the network it makes me wonder if this network has any kind of future. That’s why I said the last pro is important. The site itself is very nice, the navigation is as smooth and easy to use as any site I have been a member of. The technical quality is very good with every scene having these video download options: 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile and most scenes have photos you can download. It would be a shame to see a site with the technical potential this one is showing just fall off due to lack of content.
The hit or miss concept continues despite all those excellent technical choices, the models names are not clickable. If you see a model you like you can’t click her name to see if there are more scenes of her. There is no model list. There are no tags and that may be forgivable since each “site” sticks to whatever niche/theme is in the title.
The overall size of the “network” is a little small for the price. I do get that they are charging more since they have all videos with 4K options. I joined the group of those with 4K monitors that are still downloading 1080p. The 4K downloads just aren’t practical. I will just pull a random one up to show the size difference. “Mother’s Friend or Undercover Freak?” The 720p version is 1.7GB, the 1080p version is 3.4GB and the 4K version is an insane 14GB.
I can say I do not know any of the male or female models on this network. When you combine that with the above complaints it all feels generic. It’s like the big selling point and draw is the 4K. That’s not near enough for me. If I was running the site I would just stick everything on one site and not promote it as a network. It seems that’s going to upset more people than make them happy to get a network of 13 sites averaging 55 combined updates per year.
They do the technical parts right, but everything else needs work starting with a model list and ending with dating the scenes and keeping a list of updates. I don’t think I have seen or noticed a new scene since joining 3 weeks ago. |
|
04-14-21 07:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
223
|
Interracial Blow Bang
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
The scenarios change a little, some scenes have 5+ men with 2 women, some just have 1 woman and it’s a blowjob gangbang.
There are 116 scenes with downloadable videos and pictures.
There also are 116 female models, but some are in more than one scene since some scenes have more than one female. |
| Cons: |
The older scenes advertise HD, but are only 480p.
They charge $4 per scene for 4K downloads and it says that’s a “special offer”.
Not a smithereen of a story in the scenes.
Hasn’t updated since March 2020. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
While I do miss the inclusion of any kind of setup or story, this site at least has enough debauchery in its scenes to make up for it -- mostly. They don’t, however, follow their site’s title. Most of the scenes include some other penetration besides oral. I don’t know if that helps it or not. It makes the scenes with more than oral look like the scenes on their other sites. This network has taught me one thing, use the mute button, there is way too much overacting, screaming, yelling out what they want the men to do to them even though the men are already doing it!
I haven’t been a member of many sites that have these “blow bang” themed scenes so I would think 116 scenes is a lot for the niche. The hotness of the scenes depends on the model. Not so much her looks or body, but how she responds. The scenes with the female being quieter and more focused on what she’s doing are good. The ones where the female sounds like she’s being whipped across a gravel bed are just not worth watching.
There are some pretty models on here, but there are some that made me feel like they were the ones the site decided didn’t belong in one on one scenes. Does porn do that? A model maybe isn’t pretty enough so they put her in a scene doing something the prettier models wouldn’t do? This site is a lot like most of the others on this network. I liked maybe 1 out of every 10 scenes I watched. It also has that older porn feel to it like it was recorded in 2010. I’m assuming 2021’s porn is less aggressive due to social standards. This site doesn’t know that. I would call this site a fair site, not even quite a good one. At least it has the network to fall back on. |
|
02-26-21 06:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
224
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Photos only site with nude but not very explicit, tasteful photos of beautiful models.
Total of 2,495 photo sets and 1,072 models.
Currently averages 9-10 updates per month.
Model list and favorites section.
Photos are downloadable in zips, newest sets are 3700x5800 in resolution. |
| Cons: |
No videos with the site.They have videos, but they are staff selection videos and cost extra to download.
For a photos only site some of the photo sets are very small (30 pictures)
Most models are nude for the entire set. |
| Bottom Line: |
This seems like a site that would have been popular 10 or more years ago. The models are pretty, though hardly no variety in model types, race or body types. The photos do go fully nude, but they are not very explicit unless you consider a butt hole explicit. I noticed their updates have slowed considerably over the years. From 2018 to late 2019, they have dropped from 24 updates per month to 8-9 updates per month.
The pictures are very good quality at over 11px with 3700x5800 resolution, but the lack of videos and slowing of updates does cause some longtime concern for this site. The scenes feel like they lack imagination or vision. A lot of the poses are what I would call "non-sexual" as there's very little touching of themselves in these sets. The site is at least big with nearly 2,500 photo sets and over 1,000 models, but at times it doesn't even feel like porn. It's more like watching a woman walk around naked for no apparent reason.
The inclusion of a films tab made me think they have videos, but they do not. The films are Staff Selection and cost $3.99 to $4.99 each to view and download. You can watch a free 30 second clip of each. I was most surprised by how small some of the photo sets were, a full photo set with only 32 photos on a site that has no videos? That would be my biggest suggestion. Have larger photo sets (200-300 photos) to make up for the lack of videos.
You shouldn't have any navigation problems since there's only updates, model list and photos to go through. My overall feeling is it's not a complete site. There's something missing, more pictures or any videos. As it is, it's a back to the basics very soft photo site that doesn't even bring in many clothing fetishes. I thought this was a site like Bare Maidens where there's more of a theme to the photo sets. |
|
12-09-19 09:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
225
|
Shady Spa
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A slightly different take on handjobs, blowjobs and teasing/edging.
42 scenes, but includes access to the 10 site Tug Pass network.
Variation of model types and looks.
1080p quality downloads on all 42 scenes.
Currently updating, but not much consistency to the updates. |
| Cons: |
The consistency in updates, 2 new updates in January, 4 in February, 3 in March, 2 in April, 1 so far in May.
Unless I am missing something you can only download the videos in 1080p. I first thought it was streaming only, but realized to right click and save as.
I love variation in model looks and body types, but I don’t think everyone will have the same appreciation I do for the variation.
Scenes are short |
| Bottom Line: |
The biggest reason I joined this network was I saw where they added a new site called Edge Queens. Women edging men is maybe my favorite niche in porn and it’s hard to find it unless you go to the sites that you have to pay per scene.
Shady Spa is a newer site too. The scenes are set in a spa or massage parlor type setting. One of the 42 scenes has 2 women, the other 41 only have one woman. The oldest scenes feature models wearing germ masks, I assume those were recorded when Covid first started up. The scenes are more straightforward than I expected. There’s a very short massage at the beginning of most scenes. Which to me is the most important part of these scenes. It’s trying to separate itself from every other handjob site. While the short massage is disappointing, the scenes don’t even really try to convince you they are anything other than a handjob scene or even a porn scene. The masseuse walks in while the man lays on the massage table, almost nude, or at most dressed provocatively. When I watch a porn scene with a theme, I want to believe the theme even if it’s outrageous and unbelievable. A masseuse walking in with a string bikini, pubic hair showing, nipples showing, does not make me think this is a “spa”. Even the dialogue works against the site’s theme and it’s because of how the masseuse is dressed or not dressed. A female masseuse walks in with pubic hair showing, nipples fully exposed and says, “Do you have any problem areas you need me to work on?” I want the male to say, “Well yes, I am here for a massage, put some clothes on.” If you are going to need some inkling of believability this site isn’t going to do much for you.
The model variation is good. There are some that look very young (18-22), some that look as old as maybe 40. There are very slim models, more average size and some that are on the larger side of average-sized. There is a good mix of races. Of the 42 scenes, I am playing a guessing game on a couple of these, at least 12 of the 42 scenes have women who look black, biracial, Latina or Asian.
I do like that there are more than just handjobs. Some of the scenes are as much blowjob as handjob. There is teasing. What I would describe as close to edging. The older models seem better at making the scenes more in-depth. The one scene with two women is probably the best scene on the site and should be something they consider doing more often.
The looks of the models is something I rarely criticize and I won’t on this site either, but I will say with a lot of these “models” their reactions and what seems to be genuine enjoyment, even arousal, tops their looks. Which could be a good thing since looks are subjective. I would think you could stick a perfect 10 model in these types of scenes, but if she’s not really into it, her looks wouldn’t save the scene. These women in these scenes are also clearly not actors. I have to think their enjoyment is genuine and that helps a lot.
I don’t think any of these models are professional models. I just wish there was more to the scenes. The scenes only average about 12 minutes. That includes the 1-2 minute massage at the beginning. It kind of feels like the guy is paying for a handjob/blowjob and the woman isn’t there to make a porn scene. She’s there to make him cum and get the scene over with.
I have looked everywhere for other video resolutions and formats, but I don’t believe there are any extra versions. You get 1080p on all 42 scenes and the only other option is to download the around 12 minute scenes in 5 parts. They do have pictures and those can be downloaded. The pictures are mostly of the model posing which you don’t see in the video.
It’s not a bad site, but it could be a lot better than it is. |
|
05-11-21 03:41pm
Replies (1)
|
|
