| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
226
|
Brutal Castings
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Fetish Network of I believe 52 sites.
Some variety ethnically but all the models are very young.
I normally would avoid a site with the word "brutal" in the title, but these scenes are not brutal at all. Some are even arousing and fun to watch.
I knew a lot of the 59 models which is a surprise for me and like the ones I know of. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating and really I don't think the network is updating.
Nearly every model has tattoos. I personally like tattoos, but know it is more often seen as a negative by porn fans.
Too predictable as each scene is identical except for the models.
Prechecked cross sell |
| Bottom Line: |
Brutal Castings has 59 videos that has not updated since April 2017. It was active for about two years and it was very controversial.
In the documentary “Hot Girls Wanted” porn star Ava Taylor states that her scene on this site turned her off from continuing her career. The fact is that she did scenes after the one on this site and later admitted that the reason she left porn had nothing to do with this scene.
After that controversy the site changed the format somewhat. At the end of each scene, they had an interview with the porn star. They talked about how much fun it was and that they were happy they did the scenes. You see smiling and sometimes laughing. How sincere this was is unknowable. Maybe it was required by the site as a condition in order to get paid. This is fairly common on sites that have BDSM as a theme.
What this boils down to is a site with forceful, but BDSM that is light by porn standards. If you have seen Kink sites, you could even call this one tame in comparison. The basic premise is that a very young aspiring, but inexperienced wannabe glamour model shows up at a modeling agency. She is coaxed into going to topless with panties or just bra and panties. They are verbally pressured to go nude, they resist and are lightly tied up, binding their wrists together with a rope. The abuse is not really much and is primarily verbal.
Ava Taylor looked a bit spaced out in her scene, but not shocked. I think she was not into this sexually and was just earning a paycheck. None of the women seem sincerely surprised or shocked either.
I did not see any anal and every scene is oral by one partner on the other and then vaginal. There is nothing over the top sexually.
Besides Ava Taylor, they also have Sadie Pop, Piper Perri and Gina Valentina. These are all beautiful professionals that can be counted on for top notch scenes. However, one scene caught my eye with star Ally Berry. I have never seen her before but she is my new favorite as she is the perfect combination of looks and believable enthusiasm. I am fairly sure all the models are Americans.
By itself this site does not have enough to get my recommendation. However there are many other interesting sites that are included as the network has 52 sites. |
|
08-12-20 12:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
227
|
No Way Am I Gay
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I found I have access to with a membership to Finishes the Job. It is a solo male masturbation site.
Despite being an old site this is not a common niche (solo men) and there are close to 50 videos of what I may regret saying -- masculine, straight men masturbating (even more rare, than just male solo masturbation)
The scenes are not long and the quality is not high. You can download all the scenes very quickly.
The quality of the videos isn’t very good in numbers (resolution), but I believe the bitrate for this resolution makes the videos good enough -- barely.
There are pictures, but no way to download them.
No frills navigation, 4 scenes per page, scroll, download, scroll, download.
Quite attractive men for a solo masturbation site. I believe some of these guys have gone on to bigger careers in porn. |
| Cons: |
Each guy’s scene lists his dick size and that’s me shaking my head no. Inflation is a real concern when it comes to money, but these numbers are no way right. One guy is listed as 8” long, 4” wide. He looks maybe average size. Maybe the 4” wide is full-girth? Which would be hard to believe for an 8” long dick. Since that wouldn’t be very round at all.
The pictures would be interesting to download and look at, but no downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had to talk myself into reviewing this site. I was not planning on it until I tested out the different options. Each scene has 12 or more “parts” to download. Those are listed as “midband” which tells how old the site is. It also has a 3 part “broadband” version. Continuing my scrolling there is a full version of the video in midband and broadband. That, to me, justifies a review and me downloading all the scenes.
The broadband version of the full scenes is 480p with 1600 bitrate which makes the videos okay in quality, similar to a tube site. The midband version is 336p. Solo men is the one genre of porn I don’t expect or even want a story. I also don’t want it to last for 20+ minutes. These scenes have no story and most are 10-12 minutes per scene making the file sizes -- when combined with the 480p resolution -- under 200 MB. The site worked very well. The scenes downloaded fast -- almost as fast as I could get the next one started. I know this review won’t interest most of the Porn User members, but do think that’s why a review of a site like this is important. It’s a throw-in site with the Finishes the Job Network which I enjoyed. That makes this site the icing on the cake. The biggest complaint I have with solo men sites is it’s usually easy to tell the scenes are made for gay men. That could be from the effeminate personality of the male that’s masturbating or the male model showing his butthole, playing with his butthole and that does detract for a straight female. These guys may be gay, but they do a very good job of making me believe they are straight men who are masculine. I can count the number of solo male sites that have masculine men on them on my two hands. It’s just not common. This site isn’t that big with 48 videos, but that’s 48 masculine solo men scenes I won’t find on most solo male sites.
The scenes are basic in setup. The guy sits down and masturbates. Scene over. In a lot of ways, I feel like that adds to the masculinity of the male models on the site. These guys act and look like they are just masturbating to finish. Which makes for a highly attractive visual for women that enjoys seeing a man masturbate. Hopefully, some studio will realize the potential in a site like this and give this type of porn another try. |
|
08-09-21 03:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
228
|
Doc Squirt
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good site that is only held back by its small size
Includes access to four other sites
Pro models including a few I really like (Roxy Lips and Roxy Sky)
Three separate download options on videos including 4K, 1080p and 720p
Uses CCBill as biller if you select “alternate biller”.
Scenes are surprisingly long despite hardly no story (30+ minutes, with some in the 40+ minutes range). |
| Cons: |
Varying consistency in the “squirt”.
Navigation on the “network” is okay, but it shows terrible inconsistencies.
There are screen captures, but no pictures and the screen captures are not downloadable. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has some strong positives. The video quality on all the scenes is excellent. They have even started adding updates again after what looks like a Covid break. The 4 sites that are included are: Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Xfeeds.net, from what I can tell the Xfeeds.net is just a site that collects all the content from Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Doc Squirt into one location. That’s why I said there’s terrible inconsistency. Doc Squirt only shows 15 scenes, but if you search in the categories, there are 27 squirting videos. It looks like they tried to make everything look more complicated than it is and it made the sites more complicated than they need to be.
The scenes do follow a similar plot. I will go into my experience of “squirting”. It is possible for an aroused woman to squirt, but I assume porn directors and producers don’t take the time to look up definitions. A squirt is a small quantity of liquid ejected from something. That’s when you know the squirt is real and some of these scenes do have women ejaculating or squirting small amounts of liquid. The rest are doing the porn-loved fountain squirt that soaks the entire room. That is accomplished by pressing on the bladder. Much talk is about g-spot stimulation with the fountain squirt, but it’s bladder pressure. The g-spot stimulation causes the small squirt that isn’t near as visually impressive or -- soaking.
I thought both of the Roxy Lips scenes on Doc Squirt were excellent. She does seem to be a natural squirter and you can even watch the woman’s expressions. A lot of those fountain squirters are laughing. If a woman is having an orgasm that causes fluid to squirt across a room she’s not going to be laughing. I have seen Roxy Lips on a few other sites showing her squirting ability. The other Roxy (Sky), just puts on a great performance, she’s very energetic and into the scene. It seems like as long as squirting has been in porn someone would realize how fake or real the squirting looks.
The size of the site is disappointing and it’s one reason I decided to review it. I joined through Doc Squirt since it looked like they had at least 30-40 or more scenes on the site, but it only shows 15 once in the member area. The recent updates include 3 over the last month. The scenes I could live without are the ones where the guy sticks multiple fingers in the woman and jerks his arm as fast as possible since if you do that to any woman she’s going to urinate on you! This niche would be better served with a “Mistress Squirt” instead of Doc Squirt. They could easily find women who are capable of teaching most women to at least ejaculate a little liquid. Instead, it’s more of the same as it has been for the last 10 years of a man showing the bladder weakness of women if their insides are being stretched open. It’s a good site when combined with the network, but as a site on its own it wouldn’t be worth most people’s time unless they really liked specific models. The model list follows the problems of the navigation since it doesn’t separate the models scenes by site. It just shows you that a model has 4 scenes and one of each of those could be on one of each of their sites, even if you are on the Doc Squirt site. |
|
02-09-21 06:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
229
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What looks to be genuine amateur content
There are 229 scenes with no new updates in sight
Only one downloadable video option, but it is 720p WMV
Mixture of niches and the performance quality is just as varied
There are some hidden gems in these videos including a few group scenes. |
| Cons: |
No streaming ability. I like to scan through a scene to see if it’s worth downloading, but even though they have the option to stream nothing happens when you hit play.
The poor performances in some of the scenes.
Every scene varies including location, camerawork, attractiveness of models and there are more bad ones than good ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have seen the ex-GF network and thought maybe this was related to it, but I’m pretty sure it’s not. These videos are of young European guys and girls. I don’t know how much I believe the ex-GF part. The scenes I have downloaded and watched seem more like a desperate female trying to break into the porn industry by having someone film her having sex. Maybe the part that signals “amateurs” more than anything else are the guys in the scenes. There are guys in these scenes that look like they were picked up on the side of a road and cast into their first ever video. It is hard to tell how old these scenes are too. There is a group of guys that are in a couple of the scenes that have mullets, are wearing wife beater tank tops and look like they were just released from a low-security jail for shoplifting. It’s at least authentic.
That goes into the performances. The guys in these scenes give it their all. The girls go from at least interested and trying to look like they would rather be sleeping. The scene count is misleading as well. At least half of the scenes do not have videos with them. It seems to be either photos or video for each one. I haven’t found one scene yet that has both video and photos. There is a lot broken within the site too. The scenes with just pictures don't even have a picture of the girl in the scene. It’s a broken image with the x in the corner.
I do think there’s some redeeming qualities. Some of the videos are pretty good. The 720p video isn’t bad either. I think the biggest positive is this seems very authentic. It’s a nice change from the other sites on this network where I feel like nearly everything is formulaic and repetitive. There are some public and outdoor scenes too. I think this site makes me realize how frustrating the network is. Seeing the same positions in the same style room for nearly the same exact amount of minutes is not good when it comes to porn. This site is receiving a higher score than it probably deserves, but some might look over this site if they join this network. Maybe a decent score will make others look at it to get a break from the monotone style of most of the sites on this network. |
|
09-28-20 09:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
230
|
Stroke That Dick
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Solo, mostly believable straight, masculine, handsome men masturbating.
The guys on here make the cumshot look like they’re painting a masterpiece.
Downloadable photos
Videos are downloadable but are all 480p.
Comes with the very good Next Door Studios Network |
| Cons: |
The site hasn’t been updated in 12 years.
While it’s a con, only 77 scenes, that’s more solo scenes of men than I’ve seen on some men DVD sites.
Probably the most masculine men on the site and they stopped updating it.
Same location for most shoots |
| Bottom Line: |
This was a tough site to review. It’s not easy being a straight woman trying to find porn of believably straight men masturbating. You can find them on tube sites and if you join a dating site!
This is probably the closest I’ve seen to what looks like and acts like believable straight men masturbating. There are a few of the guys that don’t seem straight, but it does look like some of these guys are watching porn while masturbating. I can convince myself they’re watching straight porn or a woman masturbating.
I can’t score it high. The video quality is maybe acceptable at 480p, there also hasn’t been an update since 2008. It does – however – make for a good site included with the Next Door Network. Especially since I know more than a few women who join gay sites looking for male masturbation videos. The size of the site with 77 scenes isn’t impressive compared to most porn sites these days, but in male solo porn, 77 scenes is an okay amount.
The pictures are okay too. Though I will say the pictures can change your mind about whether these guys are straight or not. I would recommend avoiding those for any straight women convincing themselves these are straight men.
They do fall into the same repetitious setting that I have noticed on a lot of solo men scenes. There’s been 40-50 guys that came on that couch at least put a cover over it!
When combined with Next Door Network’s “Next Door Male” you will have 650-700 solo men scenes to choose from. The other sites in the network have some solo scenes too, but most are under 15 scenes. This review also will help those females like me that has seen some of these videos on tube sites and wondered how much content the site “Stroke That Dick” has on it. Not a lot and no new updates. At least the videos are downloadable, and the much larger network brings the value up. |
|
05-18-20 10:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
231
|
Adult Mobile, formerly Mile High Media
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the first networks I joined and was once a favorite.
Comes with Doghouse Digital, Sweetheart Video, Reality Junkies and Sweet Sinner.
4,249 videos, each video comes with a photo set
Doghouse Digital has some of the best m/m/f bisexual scenes available anywhere.
Almost 1,500 models. |
| Cons: |
The last time I was a member this network was owned by Gamma. It's now owned by Mind Geek, the very group I said I wouldn't join another site from and here I am again.
Good join price of $7.99, add $14.99 if you want to download. This group is terrible for this practice.
ProBiller is the billing processor. You get to either chat with someone that tries to upsell you other memberships or doesn't cancel the account and you get charged for another month. I've got to where I just email a cancellation notice to them and that seems to work, but it's still frustrating to cancel. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I joined Mile High Media it was for their Bisexual MMF scenes. I would have rated it a 90 or higher back then.
Now, it seems Mind Geek owns the site and they're back to their typical charge extra for downloads nonsense and requiring you to jump through a dozen hoops to cancel through their billing processor. It's hard to explain just how much something this small can completely ruin the user's experience.
I paid the $14.99 extra for downloads. When I was a member before I didn't download anything since I only had a small hard drive in my laptop. I bought an external hard drive a few months ago and wanted to download some of these scenes. What seemed like a good deal ended up costing $23.
The bisexual scenes have not been updated since I was last a member in 2015. It looks like they've made Biempire a different standalone site. At this point, it's like saying "who knows?" There's a surprise around every corner, a new charge, a new promotion for another site and it never ends.
The overall content here is okay, most of it is normal hardcore that you could get from a DVD site. There's very little that stands out.
The newer videos have 4K option if you pay for downloads.
You can't even download the photo sets without paying for the downloads.
The amount of content is impressive at over 4,000 scenes, but the navigation limits how easy it is to find what you're looking for. The categories are vague and limited. If you use the search box you either have to search by model name or scene name, like you're going to know the names of DVDs you've not seen? You can't just search for a category or niche. I searched "bisexual" it only brings up scenes with bisexual in the name, so just "bi" wouldn't show up. Searching "transsexual" brings up nothing, but reducing it to "tranny" brings up a whole series.
Neither bisexual or transsexual/tranny are listed in the categories you can choose from.
They have a good selection of 1,500 professional models, but they are making these sites way too frustrating to use and too hard on the purse to keep joining them. I really don't understand the Biempire part. If you look on TBP, Biempire's review says it comes with "Your membership comes with network access to Mile High Media. Other hot sites include Doghouse Digital, Sweet Sinner and Reality Junkies."
It had 133 scenes at the time of the TBP review and was updating in 2017. On Mile High Media, the newest bisexual scene is 2015 and there's only 79 bisexual scenes. Maybe porn sites should start competing to see who can confuse their customers the most?
I really don't know if it's worth taking the risk to join Biempire. I'm guessing they're going to have the same pay for downloads problem. I now need a filter button to block myself from joining sites ran by Mindgeek. |
|
12-09-19 10:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
232
|
Pansexual X
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site that can have a blend of porn genres in each scene.
Updated regularly, but there is no set schedule.
Mostly attractive men, women and transsexuals.
There are only 39 scenes currently, but all 39 have up to 4K downloads on videos.
Seems like a genre or niche with unlimited potential, but that creates cons, too.
Had a billing problem, but the chat was friendly and fixed it. |
| Cons: |
This plays off the pro about the potential. It feels like they are going to need a lot of time to really figure out the direction to take this site.
Too many non-porn scenes considering there are only 39 scenes. There are interviews and behind the scenes videos mixed in.
It goes without saying, so I will say it, there will be a lot of people turned away from this genre. |
| Bottom Line: |
PansexualX is a site that tries to mix standard straight sex with bisexual sex and adds transsexuals plus transgender models. This sounds really good in thought. The first and clearest problem to me is there are scenes with 2 models. I understand that when it’s a straight site. I don’t understand it when you are promoted as a site that covers straight, bi and transsexual. I want to say three models in each scene should be the minimum. There is even a solo scene. That shows the part about it feels like they don’t know which direction to take the site. Of the 39 scenes, there is one sex scene with more than 2 people. One. Each scene has a behind the scenes, interview and sex video. I could be mistaken on this, but the last time I was a member there were scenes from their other transsexual sites on this one. Those have been removed and replaced with the new scenes.
I was going to review it the last time I was a member but noticed how many scenes were from their other sites. That has changed now, but I even get the feeling the site is losing momentum. The update schedule started out as nearly weekly. It then switched to twice per month (3 scenes in each) and now it’s once per month. The site only started in June 2021.
The one big positive is the video quality. There are 8 download resolutions starting at 160p and ending at 4K.
My feeling about what I see on this site: A transsexual and bisexual site. It’s not even as good of a transsexual sites as their other transsexual sites and the bisexual parts are not that good. The sex scenes are longer (in the 30 minutes range), but the feeling of not knowing what direction to go in is even in the scenes. One scene stands out and is possibly the only scene I will keep from the site. It has Adriana Chechik and Aspen Brooks (transsexual) in it. Even the interview video for it is very good. Most of the rest of the scenes – despite big name stars (I wouldn’t know the names if they weren’t stars), have a generic feel to them. The interviews seem to be there to replace any functioning story in the scenes. Maybe they can salvage this site and reach the potential, but the pairings show it’s not going much beyond transsexual sites. Only one one-fourth of the scenes have a female in them. It’s more leaning towards transsexuals with men and transsexuals with transsexuals which is what a transsexual site usually is. As someone that collects transsexual with women, I was expecting to see that in every scene, but I was also expecting to see more than 2 people in the majority of the scenes. I don’t see it pushing any boundaries at this point. It’s a transsexual site. I do know the term “pansexual” is used loosely in current times, but why not just call it another transsexual site? Maybe I am being too critical? I just believe when you have a couple of the best transsexual sites on your network, then you add this new site that is promoted as something groundbreaking, I expect to see something besides what would only be average transsexual scenes on their other transsexual sites. Which is the percentage to know, 100% of the scenes have a transsexual in them. |
|
01-12-22 08:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
233
|
VideoBox Men
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
More naked men than an orgy in Rome
Streaming feature works well
488 advertised "straight guy" scenes...
Good price and has gift card join option...
No annoying ads
Easy signup and cancellation
Downloads are unlimited and can be downloaded with a download manager. |
| Cons: |
488 advertised straight guy scenes with 200+ of them having the straight guy having sex with another man.
The gift card join option charges more than the regular pay option charges.
Videobox Men should have a blend of content for gay men to watch and for straight women to watch. If the title was Gay Videobox, I would not complain about it.
Video quality is average or below. |
| Bottom Line: |
My first experience with pay porn was Videobox. I joined it in 2011 or 2012 for 2 years. It came with a free Roku.
It was only natural for me to give Videobox Men a try. I knew it was aimed at gay men, but it also features "straight men" on their preview. After all, the site is named Videobox Men, not Gay Videobox, which I think it was once named.
I should have expected less. The site offered a 1 month membership for $12 or I could trade in a gift card. I had a $20 gift card from a store that I no longer am near. I entered it to trade it for a membership. The $20 gift card turned into 16 days access. If paying cash it is 40 cents a day. If paying with a gift card it is $1.25 a day. I had no use for the gift card so I pushed forward with the higher exchange rate.
I opened the categories and went to "straight men". This is from the first 32 scenes that showed up -- 16 had men having sex with another man and 2 of the others included men give themselves auto-fellatio. I understand there is a market for gay men to see a straight man seduced into sex with a gay men, but should it be called "straight man"? The straight men category only makes up 488 of 9,253 scenes.
I tried the "solo" category. This number is not going to be as poorly labeled as the straight man category was, but of the first 32 "solo" scenes, 7 have men having sex with each other. Solo equals one person.
I found some of straight men masturbating. Some of those looked like they were recorded before I was born. The videos had a yellow tint in the background like a vintage newspaper. The videos had skips like old film projectors had. You cannot watch a man masturbate with the screen bouncing up and down.
I did find some newer DVDs they have with names like, "Men of Erdine", "Men of Istanbul" that might be straight men masturbating. Nothing great for me -- born in India -- and not attracted to Middle Eastern men, but maybe they are adding some solo straight scenes.
I have tried to watch gay scenes. Some are okay, but it is not very realistic for a woman to fantasize that hairy man taking it up the butt is her. The solo scenes at least can let a woman feel like we are the one recording or we are masturbating along with the man.
I have a negative feeling about this site even for gay men. Most of the videos seem generic. Even if others do not see a problem with the category problem -- I think it shows a lack of attention for detail -- and would believe it is not just a problem in the categories I used in this review with those problems. I feel bad for those that subscribe mostly to gay porn. The quality does not seem to be there; neither is the care we see in straight sites.
My score includes some points for more than half of the newest solo DVDs being of what appear to be straight men. They have one called All-American Beauties. The men are believably straight, but one of them masturbates with a pumpkin and another sticks his penis in a seashell. The voyeuristic quality of watching them masturbate with odd objects is okay, but I would start laughing at both of them.
That is the other reason I feel bad for those buying gay porn. There is a lack of production quality.
I only would recommend it if you have a gift card to a store without a quality website or location within 1,000 miles of you. |
|
07-14-19 01:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
234
|
Interracial Pickups
(0)
66.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
There’s not really a way to describe this site other than most scenes are 2 black guys with 1 white woman.
195 scenes with downloadable videos and pictures.
There are 93 female models on this site. |
| Cons: |
They are not a threat to any of those out there trying to win a Pulitzer Prize. The stories are dull and last 1-2 minutes. It takes longer to read the scene description than it does to watch the story part of the scene.
Charging $4 per 4K scene makes me hope no one has ever bought one of those.
The site is either updating once every two months or it has stopped updating. The last update was December 2020. They would be due a new one right now if they were updating every two months like they had been in the past. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This site is exactly why I didn’t know if I should join this network. The acting is poor, the writing/dialogue could be taken from a bathroom stall wall and there’s no creativity to be found. The one part the site itself has going for it is some of the models are very pretty. Most of the scenes turn into dual penetration, going more in the direction of the harder side of hardcore porn and I will make the blanket statement of when scenes go that hardcore they become dumber. Maybe because it requires more concentration for two guys to have vaginal and anal sex with the woman at the same time? It takes away any possibility of the guys doing or saying anything that might be interesting or arousing. The women are mostly over-acting in the scenes to give a feeling of being overwhelmed. If the women were amateurs then I could understand the possibility of being overwhelmed, but I have heard of most of these models by name.
When I first started watching porn on a regular basis, it would turn me away when I watched a scene where I could tell the woman was trying to make her combination of pain and pleasure easy to “see” by screaming out about how great it is and alternating with how much it hurts. That’s what these scenes remind me of, porn from about 7-10 years ago, but they are newer scenes.
The site has 195 videos and my membership is running out so I won’t know if they do update it. They had been updating this site every other month, but they are currently 5 days over 2 months since their last update. I don’t think it’s a big loss. Especially if they use the resources used here on one of their better sites. Besides the solo model sites they include in their network, I would rank this site at or near the very bottom of their sites. |
|
02-26-21 05:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
235
|
Sssh.com
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Award winning porn for women. That's what the main page says.
Implies the stories in the scenes were written by professional erotica authors.
This should be a con, but I am going to give them credit for doing a great job of marketing what is a poor to mediocre site.
I believe there is a market for this type of "female-aimed" porn, it's just not for me. |
| Cons: |
Has not updated in years. The site itself does not look modern either.
Boring content that is just not erotic enough
Very little if any HD content. The photo sets are also low quality and do not even zip downloads.
Not a big name biller.
The site is hard to use as it has folders inside folders to find only low quality inside. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am very interested in the niche of porn for women. I never knew that back in 1999, there was a site dedicated to what us girls want to see. So I took the plunge and joined. The site was only $4.95 so I figured I did not have much to lose by checking it out.
In the more than 20 years since this site opened, there have been two major changes. One is that women have become more assertive sexually and we know what we want and how we want it. The other change is in the world of porn. It is now so readily available that we have choices. When this site was started this was it. For women we have seen a lessening of the stigma there once was when we admitted to liking porn. To a degree porn itself has evolved, just not enough. One day there will be better choices but modern porn is still a man’s world.
For me this was a history lesson, a peek into the world of sexual entertainment of a different time and a different place. The founder was a woman. Looking at it now, she made a site that seems to represent stereotypes of what women need. There is a large emphasis on sexy stories, shopping and makeup. That may be fine for some, but it is not me in 2020. I think she made a site that she would like. It did not work for many of us and it abruptly ended in about 2015 as a failed experiment. It even comes off as more of a blog or personal experience for the webmaster who decided to add some porn for some extra zest and appeal.
I want to see a lot more that stimulates my mind to make me in the mood. I need a harder edge than many and I am not ashamed to say that. One of my all time favorites is Kink, and this is not in the same class, not the same building or the same country for that matter.
I hate to complain about a site that was extremely cheap to join, but whatever little there was to download, I did not bother to keep.
This site probably deserves a score of fifty, but I am in a good mood today and will give them a few extra points for being a pioneer. I think 64 is about right. |
|
09-28-20 09:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
236
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I thought I might like based on me liking a site that had dildos squirting fake cum on women.
316 scenes total and they are listing updates, but there were 276 scenes on the site in 2015.
Newest videos are 1080p, no other download options other than downloading the scene in parts.
This usually lands in the cons, but the scenes are short and it’s a pro.
Photos of the models posing with downloads. |
| Cons: |
This will be the first time I ever listed this as a con, the women. There are some average looking women on here and they are the best looking women on the site.
There’s not even humor involved despite the fake cumshots.
The women trying to act like the cum is real.
The edit in every scene where I assume the male attaches or connects the cum squirter.
The older scenes are 480p |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined a site a while back called Slime Wave. I thought I would hate it, it has dildos shooting large amounts of cum on the women. I liked it. I thought this site would be similar. It’s not. This site instead of having strategically placed squirting dildos, just has a man getting a blowjob, then he says he’s going to cum. The woman moves back, there is a video edit, and the continuous flood of cum squirts “out of his dick”. As much as I enjoyed Slime Wave, the site which is similar in its gimmick, seemed to lose my interest when the edit happened. I am not for sure if the man has some sort of sprayer he is squirting the fake cum from, but do believe that is what I didn’t like about this site. With Slime Wave, the fake cum was being shot out of fake dicks (dildos) with no man in sight. With this site, a real man with a real dick, is shooting fake cum out.
I have been a member of two different sites with clear edits in their scenes. I believe that may be the most off-putting action possible in a porn scene.
The site is large with 316 scenes, but I didn’t find myself interested in watching more than the ending to see if all the scenes have the obvious edit. From the ones I watched they all had the same edit right before the cumshot. I don’t understand the thinking behind this or the arousal for the viewer. It’s like watching a reality show only to find out it’s fake on the last episode. When one of my pros is the “scenes are short” it probably isn’t a good sign. Most of the scenes I watched, you can’t see the time on the scenes until you start watching/streaming or download them, were around 7 minutes. These look like they could just use the content from their other sites for the first 95% of the video, throw the edit in and introduce the gimmick of the real dick shooting gallons of fake cum. I wasn’t going to review this site until I noticed the dates on the scenes do show the site as updating weekly. I have read various member reviews about this network recycling their content and based on the The Best Porn review there were 276 scenes in 2015. There are only 316 scenes in 2021, but they show weekly updates. I am sure if there were weekly updates there would be far more updates in 6 years than 40.
I do find the site to be a negative on what is at best -- an okay network. The women try to act their way through the scenes on this specific site. They try to act like the fake cum surprises them and excites them. It has too much of a parody feel to the site. Which represents the biggest problem this site causes the entire network. The women on this site “act” like they do in their other scenes on the network. I also have now found my most disliked part of porn, an obvious edit in a scene.
The women on this site are average looking at best. There really isn’t anything that positive about this site other than network access. This site combined with their newer sites in the network makes me think a full network review will be sufficient instead of reviewing all the sites in the network. If you are familiar with Slime Wave or any of the sites that use fake cum shooting from dildos, do not believe this site has the same appeal. The sites with dildos shooting fake cum look more like a fetish and go into the Wet And Messy niche. This site fits the edited and should have been scrapped -- niche. Maybe they have scrapped it, but showing that it’s still updating weekly only makes it worse. This is one of my lowest scores for an individual site. |
|
05-11-21 03:43pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
237
|
Gloryholes And Hand Jobs
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
This is one of the “gay” sites on the network and it focuses on guys giving guys handjobs and blowjobs through gloryholes or just out in the open.
There are 86 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
The site looks to update twice per month, if they’re being honest. |
| Cons: |
I don’t think the site is being honest. I have been told in the past to check the latest fact update on The Best Porn. This site was updated on The Best Porn in January 2016. There were 86 scenes which is the same amount there are now.
The biggest download resolution for any of the videos is 720p.
The scenes are redundant and I doubt would appeal to gay men or straight women.
The model list doesn’t work even though they have a separate “male” model list. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
It surprised me when I noticed the “gay” sites on Dogfart, but it does look like they are recycling the content on this site and possibly have been for a long time. I first noticed the videos don’t have a higher download resolution than 720p and the newest one is listed as being released on February 19, 2021. Is there a period where we look over a site recycling? I don’t understand why they list this site as still updating since several of their other sites show that they are not updating.
The scenes I did watch were poor to average. I have joined a lot of “gay” sites over the years and can say this is one of the worst. The gloryhole scenes are set in a room with what looks like a 13 inch television from decades ago. The guy who is going to give the blowjob is in that room “watching” porn and masturbating. He doesn’t seem to notice the hole in the wall right beside him until a dick pops through it then it turns into a very standard and basic blowjob/handjob. I don’t believe women are better at this type of porn, but if you watch the gloryhole scenes on this network with women they are much better than the ones with the men being the one giving the pleasure.
There are 86 scenes. The same number there was in 2016 and they do still advertise these scenes as being newly updated. The download resolution options are: 384p, 432p and 720p, all three files have 720p in the filename. There’s just a lot of dishonesty going on with this site. I felt like reviewing it would at least tell those interested in the “gay” sites on the network don’t join just for the gay sites. I’m not for sure what the ratio or interest level of gay men would be towards this network. I have read a few reviews here about gay men enjoying gloryhole porn even it’s a woman pleasuring the man. This site is the bottom of the Dogfart barrel. |
|
02-26-21 05:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
238
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
It's not the first time I have heard about the "me too" part. If he was a pastor, a doctor, a psychologist, someone from a field that values morals and dignity, maybe I would look more into one of the American creations to ruin or cancel successful people, but he's a man that has been paying, likely, desperate and broke young women for sex for 20 years, then it would matter more to me. It is why I said the part about Americans. I don't care what others have labeled him as or alleged. He's a porn producer and performer. He's likely the easiest person, in Puritan America, to blame for taking advantage of women.
|
05-15-22 06:52am
|
Reply
239
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Porn Fidelity chose to name their site with the word Fidelity. The two founders were Ryan and Kelly Madison. They made their marriage the heart of the site. You said I am saying it's the heart of the site. You used the Covid-time to show they are not even active. You showed 2, maybe 3 years, the site has been active for 18+ years. What about the other 15 years? Were Kelly and Ryan in more scenes than everyone else? Was the basis of the site them picking up other women? Is that content still available on this site? The recent content does not make up the entire site and I reviewed the entire site not just the recent updates.
You act like no one is right about their marriage being what these sites were based on when they started. You could correct Rabbit, his reviews have talked about their marriage. You could correct TBP, their current review talks about their marriage's importance to the site. If you know the site as well as you're saying, you would know that. I have had a year membership for a total of 6 different years to the site. I come from a country where men are allowed to practice infidelity without their wives being allowed to say anything. It's a learned environmental fetish for me.
|
05-11-22 12:03pm
|
Reply
240
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Sorry about review-blocking (is that like cock-blocking?) you! I joined the FTV sites on a 3 month combo promo and am running out of time on them.
I still am having problems with the video downloads. I think it's because of the filenames.
I believe we talked once before about tattooed models always end up in these brutal hardcore scenes and I see Milfs in a similar way. Every site that has Milfs it's either having sex with her daughter's boyfriend or these outlandish storylines that are kind of degrading. That is one part I really liked about FTV Milfs, even the older women on it. It shows them being just as horny and taking care of themselves just like we usually see teens and 20s models doing. I do like the FTV Girls site better, but it has weighed me down on the review since I was brand new to it and there's so much content on it.
I would be interested in a FTVX site. I like the way they film and produce their scenes. I don't know if adding a male would make it harder to be as flexible with their scenes or not, but I would check it out. I am planning on renewing the 3 months to just FTV Girls once this combo membership runs out.
|
04-14-21 07:08am
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Unless I overpay for a site I almost always feel like I got my money's worth. I joined 14 sites/networks last holiday season for 1 year each and have easily got my money's worth on those.
|
09-30-20 12:19am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Poll
Updated log/dated content for me. I don't know a lot of models names or that would be the pick. I don't think I ever used the favorites or feedback options. I only look at porn on mobile if I have a break from work.
|
09-30-20 12:16am
|
Reply
243
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Being from a country and culture that even in some religious beliefs says we are gender-less, the TS sites get a lot of interest from me, but most are not that good. If you like the feminine TS models with men you should look at Ladyboy Gold. I thought their models were the most feminine and pretty. Nearly all of their hardcore content is TS with male or TS with TS. Also, another one I reviewed recently Ladyboy-Ladyboy or Ladyboy.xxx, you get both and another Ladyboy site with one membership. Most of the Ladyboys are of slight frames lending more to the feminine look.
|
09-30-20 12:13am
|
Reply
244
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
It's definitely a favorite of mine. I just hope they aren't ending it. Most TS sites I have tried have almost no story and it just seems out of place for this genre. Like the straight woman isn't going to question why this pretty woman has a dick? Most of the sites just leave it open to interpretation. This one does a good job of I guess what would be called "selling it" or making it seem more realistic.
|
09-30-20 12:04am
|
Reply
245
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
GERMANTZ's Reply
When I paid for the site it made my account a "prime" account. That's the only difference I can tell prime adds. It takes you from a free account with no downloads to an account you can download with. The welcome email even says, "Welcome! Congratulations on joining Bang Prime!"
The Premium channels just look like adding other paid sites to your account. They offer Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. It doesn't list any details like how much they cost or if you're getting the whole sites or not.
|
09-30-20 12:00am
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 06-21-20
I also have not received my gift card for the June 17th raffle. It seems like Tom is having to do all the work by himself.
|
07-01-20 06:31am
|
Reply
247
|
Private Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Reply
Understood, I wasn't born until the 80's so anything before the 90's doesn't interest me as much. I also didn't know much about the studio except the first porn I watched was from it.
|
07-01-20 06:28am
|
Reply
248
|
Private Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Comment
I'm not for sure what "signed talent" means, but Pierre Woodman only produced 48 of the 350 DVDs on here.
|
06-26-20 05:20pm
|
Reply
249
|
Cody Cummings
(0)
|
Reply of
UMBA8's Reply
The Cody Cummings site was the only one in the network that had the bisexual and hetero. The others had some solo guys, but not any with women. I have reviewed a few bisexual sites that were good, but small in size. There are several bisexual sites that aren't listed here that I liked a lot. I could reply with their names if you're interested.
|
06-17-20 04:49am
|
Reply
250
|
Family Screw
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Reply
No, I'm not for sure why you would think you know what I liked. I said there were a few scenes that pushed bad taste. I also really got tired of seeing Gunther. If I had to put a number on it, I would say I really liked 4 and liked maybe 10-12 others.
|
04-30-20 10:49am
|
|
