| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Girl Cum
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredibly hot messy female orgasm site.
There are 66 models, some have multiple scenes.
69 scenes, probably the only time I will ever get to say that number in a review with two updates per month.
Reading all the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. I will leave it at that.
Video and photo quality is exceptional and are available in unlimited downloads.
Easy to cancel and navigate except for a few bugs |
| Cons: |
If you go to the model list it will show you 24 models, if you click to go to the next page it shows you the same 24 models as page 1 and if you click on page 3 it shows you the same 24 models from page 1. The dropdown box does work for finding all the models.
Upsells are everywhere. They also show you scenes from sites you don’t have access to.
Maybe it fits better in cons, reading the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. |
| Bottom Line: |
I probably need to clarify my pro/con jabbing at the male reviewers for saying the female cum in these scenes is fake. It may be in some of the scenes, but from the looks of the scenes they are editing and cutting parts throughout the scenes. I am not -- as a woman, going to say the female cum is fake. It takes a very relaxed and aroused woman to produce a messy orgasm like is seen in these scenes. Some sex toys like the Magic Wand Plus are known, especially in edging a female, to cause very messy orgasms. What I notice is the women are usually very wet and starting to show messiness near the beginning of the scenes. That makes me think they are being prepped prior to the sex starting. There also is a lot of male giving the female oral sex before the intercourse starts. I am not trying to be hard on the male reviewers, but I can say women can cum that much. I am also not insinuating they are just not taking the females they have been with to that level. As I started this, I said the female needs to be very relaxed and aroused. A lot of women are insecure about showing that much sexual energy. Either way, I really love this site and hope it will update more once the pandemic is over.
This is a site that doesn’t really need stories or plots. It’s about the female’s pleasure. Which is different from 99% of straight porn out there. The models are all professionals. They are mostly young, though a few MILF models are present and they are believably horny. Despite little to no story there are scenes with extended setups like public masturbation and flashing before the scene starts. Which would also lend to the female being aroused before the guy even touches her. Is it really that hard for guys to believe a woman could get even more aroused about sex than a man does?
The site could be bigger though I picked the right time to review this since there are 69 scenes. I don’t think you will see many 69s, at least not in my memory of the scenes I have watched. With only 2 updates per month it will take a long time for this site to have a lot of scenes, but hopefully, they will stick to the current style or formula instead of making it less erotic just to produce more scenes. I will say there isn’t one scene I plan on skipping over.
The download options are another major positive. Each of the 69 scenes can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The pictures are not as impressive at 1500x1000 and the downloadable sets only have 30-50 pictures in them with most of them being taken during the sex parts.
The only thing I can find to complain about is the size of the site, but in my few years of experience of porn viewing and collecting, I usually look at a site’s size by how many scenes I want to download, not by how many scenes they have. Most sites I join, even ones with thousands of scenes, only have 50-100 scenes I download. This one has 69.
Highly recommended. |
|
09-28-20 10:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
102
|
Girls Out West
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great site for those that likes variety in female models. Probably the best, even.
Very large site that I have been a member of for nearly a year and still don’t think I have seen everything.
Higher quality than I initially expected, and it has been high quality for a long time.
Some of the most realistic porn I have ever watched.
The navigation is very easy, and the categories help you find anything you are looking for.
Besides being a large site, it updates 6 times per week. |
| Cons: |
The older scenes are lower quality and those are not even easy to find.
I don’t know that these are all amateur models. I recognize several of them and one of my favorites, I know she is on other sites. The amateur/pro label is probably stretched a little. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I joined Girls Out West, I really wasn’t for sure if I liked it. I do like a variety of models. It was one of the first sites I joined. I wasn’t really ready for this much variety. The variety is more than just skin complexion which they have a lot of different complexions. They also have very hairy models. They have heavier models, including close to Big Beautiful Women. It reminded me of a network that decided to stick all of its fetishes on one site. They do mix these models and types up. They will have a smaller woman with a big woman. A shaved woman with a very hairy woman. Kind of be prepared for that.
That is why I signed up for a year. The sex is very real. That made me want to see more. Over time, the model difference did not make much difference to me. I believe that is what they are going for. There are not a lot of stories or plots. It is more about emotion. This is advertised as a site owned by women and filmed by women. I don’t know how much difference that makes. I do see differences from regular porn. There isn’t anything robotic or planned. The scenes develop naturally. You don’t have that feel of “they have not done this yet; it’s going to be next”. You can’t do that on this site. I do believe it could throw your porn expectations balance out of whack.
The site size is very big and they have high quality. The videos have had 4K download option since 2017. They also offer 1080p, 720p and 576p. Even the 2012 videos have the 1080p and 720p options. They list over 2,000 videos that have at least 720p and 1080p. They do have picture sets you can download. I wasn’t expecting that the first time I joined it. I was thinking it’s an amateur site, they would not have high quality, but they do.
The part I was surprised by are the male with female scenes. There are not many of those. I didn’t expect any. I do not believe they are shooting anymore male with female scenes. The last I found was April 2020. Considering they update 6 days a week, I believe they would have had a new male with female scene if they were still filming that style. Besides being prepared for the variety of models, there are some things you have to get used to. Besides very hairy pubic areas some of these women have hairy armpits. That doesn’t bother me, but I know others have talked about not liking that. It is not something I find attractive, but with this style of porn, it is what they are going for. Very natural women and they are mostly all Australian. I have never been there. I don’t know if that is more common in Australia or not. Besides the small amount of male with female scenes there are some solo scenes too. I really liked those. The female models seem to be very comfortable and relaxed even going into the videos. I feel like I am getting a lesson in culture. The categories make this one of the few sites I have ever been on that the categories make sense and are accurate.
I always pay attention to the user ratings of scenes. I find that very interesting on these scenes. Some of the heavier models have solo scenes and are some of the highest rated scenes. Another blow to your porn expectation balance, the interviews are good and enjoyable to watch. Some of those have multiple females that are nude throughout the interview. They laugh, they touch each other and play around. My favorite scenes are the ones with more than 2 women. There is something about that I like. They do those lesbian threesomes better than anyone. My feelings on the looks of the models. There are some really cute and pretty females. There are some that look like normal, average women. I believe those will vary in popularity from person to person. I do believe that is what messed up my first time as a member. The combination of seeing the model as an average woman then seeing the huge pubic hair and hairy arms and armpits.
Besides that, the site is near perfect. I have heard the saying, your mileage may vary. I do believe the looks of the models could turn some people away. That is the double-edged sword of this site. Everything technical is right. I would recommend if you think you like it, join for longer than a month. The scenes can be long, the interviews are worth watching, especially if you like certain models that are in the interviews. I felt like it took me about 2 months to really like the site. It is now one of my favorite sites. I believe that is better than joining a site and being bored with it after 5 days. One of my favorites. |
|
03-20-22 10:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
103
|
Girls Try Anal
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The title could trick some, this is a lesbian site, the trying anal isn’t with men, but it is what I like about it.
Only 116 scenes, but I found around 80 of those worth downloading. It is not updating.
Explores the way I want to believe most women would want to try anal first, with another woman, a finger, a smallish dildo, not a 9 inch penis.
Video quality is excellent.
Very pretty models including a lot that I do know by name even though I don’t know a lot of models by name.
Also works in some older/younger fetishes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating. This is a site I really like as my score shows. I would join a site like this for a year just for this content.
Some poor acting, often by the older female models, does take away from the believability of some of the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site does something most porn sites do not do. It takes a concept that is completely believable and makes it look like it’s really happening. I am basing that on the more exploratory sites. This is one of the most believable to me. A few models I knew by name Gia Derza, Nia Nacci, April O’Neil, who I believe is one of the best porn actresses in the lesbian genre. It’s nice to join a site with what I would call a small number of scenes at 116, but realize you downloaded more from those 116 than you did from a site with 4,000 scenes.
The scenes all touch on a curiosity and that curiosity is having their butt penetrated. Fingers, tongues, dildos all get some action. There is more to the scenes than just the woman getting her first anal penetration, not that I believe it really is their first. These are standard lesbian scenes with the guarantee of some anal play. These scenes are long to even very long. One is 75 minutes long. You get a lot of story, a lot of believable (for porn) nervousness, seduction leading to trying the anal and that to me, is doing porn right. It removes the feeling of they’re just doing it for the paycheck.
I could pick 40 or more of these scenes as my favorite scene. And that brings in the part I don’t like, it’s no longer updating. The last update was in 2020. The videos are high quality with all scenes having up to 1080p downloads and a handful having 4K.
I don’t believe porn makes enough exploratory scenes and other sites could benefit from looking into and considering adding exploratory. A lot of sites try it with the stepmom walking in with her stepdaughter trying to give a guy a blowjob or walking in on the stepdaughter trying to finger/masturbate herself. I don’t think those sexual acts are exploratory. Most of us figured out how to masturbate regularly or give a blowjob, or if a guy, how to give a woman oral. Having an older, more experienced woman walking in a younger woman putting a butt plug in her butt for the first time, that’s exploratory. I know many women who have never tried anything anal.
I do think there is a chance for disappointment with the site since I believe some will expect this to be guys with females having first time anal sex. Just from my experience and in talking to women, their first anal with a guy was accidental. Maybe this is too narrow of a niche to appeal to the masses, but it’s the very type of porn I look for and prefer.
The main deduction from the score is that it’s not updating. While I am happy with the scenes they have, this just seems like another wasted opportunity to make porn that gives you a specific niche you rarely see in mainstream porn. Maybe the actresses are just very good at acting and make it more believable. It would be one of my highest rated sites if it was still continuing to update. |
|
07-13-21 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
104
|
Girlsway
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the biggest lesbian sites I have tried.
1,868 scenes with new scenes being added 3-4 times a week.
Video quality is great and continues to get better.
Picture sets are downloadable, but are small with less than 50 photos in each.
Has multiple niches within it and series or spoofs.
Solo scenes that are due to Covid-19, the girls film themselves masturbating at home. |
| Cons: |
There's not a dick to be found. At least not a flesh one, but plenty of fake ones.
Overacting, a lot of surprised faces at what's under another girl's panties. |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway does a very good job of splitting the sub-niches up and even have their sub-niches listed to explain them. There are:
Girls Try Anal, Mommy's Girl, Moms on Moms, Oral Experiment, Sex Tape Lesbians and True Lesbian. Besides those, they also have multiple series running at any specific time. These include Cougar Queen: A parody of Tiger King, there will multiple parts to it. Body Swap is one of their newer series that is good and has multiple parts.
My favorites are the Sex Tape Lesbian scenes. The girls play games like Dare Wheel and that leads to a sex scene. They have one that is nearly an hour long based around trying on bikinis. These scenes add enough story to make them more interesting than a lot of lesbian porn I watched. The models are very attractive. Those with the older/younger fetish they also have over 400 scenes of it with the story-driven, "Mommy's Girl" scenes. Some of the scenes are silly and playful like you would expect from a site like Team Skeet. One of the newer scenes in style has a hair stylist fixing one model's hair while the model is receiving oral from another female. They make it like the hair stylist doesn't notice at first.
They are uploading as much as anyone right now (lesbian) with an average of 3-4 times per week. The video quality on every scene has a minimum of 1080p as its highest option. There are also 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile download options. The most recent 365 scenes also have 4K downloading option. I am having a problem deciding if I like it better than Sapphic Erotica. I think I do. The amount of content is similar, but Girlsway has the added benefit of a story and some dialogue.
There also is more personality in the scenes on Girlsway. Scenes that probably make the girls genuinely laugh like 4 students touching each other while the teacher's back is turned. My second con is really the biggest one. There is a lot of overacting. Should a girl really be surprised another girl has a pussy too? The only reason I mention that is within 3 minutes the shock and surprise is replaced by the surprised one looking like an expert at giving a female oral sex. I can look over it (usually). The site is just one of the best I have reviewed. My interest in it does waver since I prefer a male in the scene. For lesbian fans I do believe this is one of the top 2-3 lesbian sites available. |
|
09-08-20 11:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
105
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Solo, extreme, gaping, pretty and sexy women.
Averages 3 updates per month. It looks like they could have more than that, but nothing consistent with the update schedule.
High quality videos and photos. All are downloadable and unlimited.
Very pretty models that I think are nearly all European. There are a few that may not be.
Bipolar porn, she looks innocent, she’s acting innocent, don’t stick THAT in there! She does it anyway. Somehow, these models do that in a pretty way.
Good navigation and tags, but they do have a lot of tags. The most I think I’ve ever seen. |
| Cons: |
It's no surprise this site is on Sapphix just like Sapphic Erotica and there is the white living room again. If a person recognized the background city, they could go watch these scenes in person. The windows have no curtains. It’s a joke, but the white background isn’t.
The scenes on this are different. A lot of the newer ones are just masturbation with some extreme parts. The older scenes are the most extreme masturbation I have seen. That’s going to be pro for some and a con for others. I don’t mind it, but believe it fits better in the cons. It’s not what you expect from solo porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
I can set up the scenes on this site by saying the model will convince you she’s an innocent little dove (thanks all white background!). She will then tease and show a little skin. She will show how pretty she is. I look away and she has a baseball bat stuck up in her and her legs in a V. It’s whoa porn. You skipped some things on your way to that V. I like it just because it jumps from innocent to not innocent in a split second or V. The models look like they belong on a softcore, glamorous site. Seeing them with only their heels on and they left those on for grips. It’s a good change from sites that stay within the softcore niche. Yeah, she’s pretty, has a nice body, but I just don’t think a guy or woman is going to want her just teasing. I want to believe women this pretty make people want to gape them. That is a unique concept this site has going for it.
Its overall size is not as big as you might think. It “only” has 402 scenes and has been open since 2004. They had a lull in updates from 2009 to 2013. There is disparity between the newest scenes and oldest scenes. It really doesn’t seem like the same site even. I do believe just like with Sapphic Erotica, it’s the models that are making that difference. It could be production as well. There are some really pretty models in the newer scenes that do some extreme. I really like Candy Belle’s scene. It’s after the lull period. I know they have it in them to make the more extreme and even excited masturbation scenes. I never thought I would say a woman using a Magic Wand on her clitoris and has a dildo up her butt, was not extreme, but it’s not extreme in 2022. I think housewives do that now.
The quality is as high as I think you can get. Especially if you consider how long they have the high quality. You can go back before the lull and those still have 720p and 1080p downloads. They had 4K starting at the new year in 2015. The scenes are very long for solo porn. The Candy Belle scene I mentioned is 52 minutes long of her teasing, in the bathtub, on the bathroom floor, on a chair, using a Magic Wand, a very girthy dildo stuck to the floor, using the sprayer in the bathtub. She ran out of toys. You still don’t get the extremes that the old scenes had. The baseball bats, the needing an assist from another model just to get that bat in her.
It’s good for those that like solo, long and teasing scenes. They do a good job of showing how teasy the model is at the beginning of the scenes. That sometimes can last 10-15 minutes. I don’t know that everyone likes that. I do, but I like softer porn. I keep thinking I’m going to develop some of the teasing ability if I watch enough. I do believe the easiest way for me to describe is it’s different. I haven’t seen sites like this. The models do it all with a big, pretty smile.
It's a good site for when you feel like you’ve seen everything that porn has to offer which isn’t much these days. I’m sure that there was a reason, some demand even, for this site to be opened back up in 2014 after the 4 years of no updates. I have liked it the last few times I joined Sapphix. |
|
08-05-22 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
106
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful models stretching themselves out for all variations of masturbation.
Long, slow becoming fervor masturbation that clearly shows orgasms.
404 scenes with updates seeming to stop 2 months ago.
The site is easy to use with simple searches or complicated if you want to jump into the advanced search.
The scenes include a long video (by masturbation standards) and photo set. Downloads are unlimited.
No ads that I have seen. |
| Cons: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I see this type of site as being something porn fans will either love or dislike, not hate. You are going to see a lot of spread pussies. There is some teasing. There is some anal play. There is a beautiful model in the same setting as the previous beautiful model spreading her pussy, teasing and possibly playing anally. Some of the models seem to be made for this kind of porn. Their scenes are very good. They love being watched, they love teasing, they love you seeing them having an orgasm. I think if that sounds good to you, you will love the site. If you need more than one person you will probably dislike the site.
It makes me think a site like this is where every gynecologist found their interest in becoming a gynecologist! I do see a site like this as female-positive. The models look stunning, you would not expect them to jump up in a chair and start spreading their legs looking like they do. They look more like they are going out on a nice date. Hopefully, someone bought them a nice dinner before they put on these performances.
The video quality is great, but inconsistent. Of the newest updates, two of the 4 newest do not have 4K, while the other 40-50 do have 4K. That makes me think they may have recycled old scenes. That was a newer term to me until recently. If you are interested in the 4K versions of these videos, you better have a lot of hard drive space and a fast internet connection as some of those are as big as 15 Gigabytes per scene. They do offer lower, in my opinion, better options with the 720p and 1080p versions. The photos add a nice touch. These photos show the model before the scene starts.
There are some unbelievable insertions, but those are in the older scenes. One has a woman masturbating with a baseball bat! The camerawork is a positive or negative for the site. There are a lot of close-ups. I believe close-ups during masturbation are only good if the model is rubbing her clitoris. If her fingers are inside her or a toy is inside her it doesn't make much sense to me to go close-up. I would classify this as a fetish site even though there are no definitive fetishes being played to unless, the pussy, is a fetish. All you need to ask yourself is do you want to look at 400 pussies? That is why I said I don't think any porn fan would hate the site. |
|
09-08-20 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
107
|
Give Me Teens
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a blend of older/younger males with females and females with females.
The site currently has 1,408 scenes, but the updates have stopped despite looking like they were really getting going in March of this year.
Videos and pictures are downloadable for every scene.
Multiple niches are interspersed (interracial, threesomes, stepfamily)
Quality of videos is high with up to 4K on newer scenes
Most of the scenes are longer in length than expected (30 minutes plus) |
| Cons: |
It’s not as much of a problem with the male with female scenes, but it’s hard to tell which is the older female in some of the lesbian scenes.
There are minimal stories and mostly poor acting. The scenes seem older than they are, even the ones released in 2021. |
| Bottom Line: |
The size of the site surprised me. It could be advertised better. I did not realize it’s an older/younger site. The scenes do leave a little to be desired. The stories are needed in this type of scene. Just listing the title as uncle or stepbrother isn’t enough. It’s a combination of those two cons. It feels like if they put a little more time into the production values, they would have a really great site on their hands.
The mixture of niches makes the content interesting with interracial, lesbian, stepfamily, threesomes -- and it’s all under the older/younger genre. There is a good mix of ethnic groups, but it could be better in the interracial scenes. As nearly all are an older black man with a younger white woman.
The site has longevity on its side, but there is the downside to that too. The oldest content goes back to 2006. The 2006 scenes to the 2011 scenes have 240p, 480p and the 2009-2010 scenes added 540p, once into 2011, the 720p and 1080p options show up. I do not think I can really complain about that. It still has 10+ years of HD scenes. The picture sets are not a pro or con. They are there, most are very small (30 pictures) and the pictures do look like screencaptures from the video.
The updating schedule is where a problem shows up. From April 2021 to current (August 2021), there have been two updates. The month of March 2021 had 7 updates just in March. The older/younger genre does seem to be sporadic with updates, but this site looks like it has stopped updating for good with the last update being 3 months ago.
The size of the site helps make up for the lack of new updates with 1,408 scenes, which is one of the biggest collections of older/younger porn I have seen. I will add these scenes do not go as extreme in the age differences as a site like Grandpas Fuck Teens. These look more like the older one is 30s to maybe 50s with the younger one looking 18-24. The length of the scenes would normally make me think there would be more story and buildup in the scene, but there’s not much of either.
I do like the site. I just wish the scenes were put together with a little more thought. Some of the scenes are dangerously close to making me feel like I’m just watching any other genre or niche -- nearing the generic feeling level. I still believe it’s a good site for those who enjoy the older/younger genre and would recommend it to those who do. |
|
08-09-21 03:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
108
|
Glory Hole Initiations
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
A different type of Gloryhole site from their other Gloryhole.com site. Most of these scenes are a white male or multiple white males with black women.
Updates once per month.
345 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The site has gone through changes over the years with the older scenes being white women with white men. Those scenes also advertise the HD option, but they are not HD, they are 480p.
The 4K videos cost $3.99 per each scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
One part that impressed me about this particular site is the women seem to be more into the scenes than on the network’s other gloryhole site (gloryhole.com). The set for the scenes is also an improvement over their other gloryhole site which just uses a bathroom stall. This site’s sets look more like a changing room. Maybe I just think the toilet stall scenes seem unsanitary? There are also scenes on this site with not only multiple men (one on either side of the wall), but some even have two women inside the “room”. There are variations from scene to scene. The main focus is a blowjob and handjob, but most of the scenes -- especially the newer ones -- include full sex through the gloryhole.
The site is of good size with 345 scenes, but they only update once per month. It does seem to be one of their more popular sites based on the user comments left on the scenes. If it’s possible, I would even say the sets are more classy than their other gloryhole site. It has more of a good feel to it than their other gloryhole site has. The women seem to enjoy themselves. There is more of a positive feeling. That’s something I believe these gloryhole sites could look into. While their other gloryhole site tries to show more of a random situation where the unsuspecting woman is surprised by the dick popping through the wall, this one has more of a we planned it this way feel.
Similar to most of the other sites on this network, the older scenes have a high resolution of 480p despite claiming “Big HD” . The majority of the scenes do have 720p and 1080p. You still have to pay $4 per scene if you want the 4K version of the videos. I liked this gloryhole site better than their other one and think they should focus on updating this one as much as they do the other one. |
|
02-26-21 05:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
109
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the most infamous real sexual fetishes.
670 scenes with downloadable videos and photo sets.
Updates twice per month.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
628 female models on this site.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
As much as I like the concept and find it arousing; the scenes become extremely repetitive.
Similar to other sites on this network the older scenes are listed as HD, but are only 480p.
Gloryhole seems like it could be used in other ways besides a woman sitting on a toilet when a random dick pops through a pre-cut hole in the wall of the stall. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This could depend (pro or con) on the person watching the scenes, but you’re going to get what the title of the name of the site says and little else. This site has tried variations on the Gloryhole concept. Maybe I’m not as porn-smart as I would like to think? I would add a 3-5 minute segment before the scene starts where the female is outside the public restroom with her husband or boyfriend or even really go out there by having a lesbian couple. When the woman is securely in the public restroom and this stranger’s hard dick pops through the wall in the stall, she can’t contain herself. Maybe it’s because I’m female and I just see so many of the scenes on this network as being clearly male-orientated?
The variations they have tried include: Not just getting a blowjob through the Gloryhole. There is vaginal penetration in some scenes as well as anal in some. There are scenes where there are two guys, one on each side of the woman’s toilet stall. Those vary from her alternating blowjobs and handjobs between the guys to blowing one while the other has vaginal sex with her. There’s just something missing for me. This seems like an excellent opportunity to play into fantasies, to maybe even not have every scene turn into a blowjob/handjob/sex. As it is, the women are all shown as so horny they’ll suck a stranger’s dick. These models like many on this network or often MILF aged. I would like to see them get some younger female models and maybe add a touch of innocence. Like having the woman only being willing to give the stranger’s dick a handjob and letting him finger her through the Gloryhole.
The amount of content and continued updates does give the site value and it is at least different (until you’ve watched 50 scenes) than regular porn to appeal to almost anyone into interracial porn. This site itself, from what I’ve seen is close to all if not all, black guys with white girls. They have another Gloryhole site that switches it around. The word Glory being in the title can’t help but make me think this is a glorified blowjob site and a glorified hardcore site. The majority of videos do include 1080p and 720p downloads and it does seem unlimited in downloads. It’s becoming routine for the sites on this network, it’s a good, not great site. The repetitiveness is easily the biggest con on this site. |
|
02-26-21 05:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
110
|
Gloryholes And Hand Jobs
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
This is one of the “gay” sites on the network and it focuses on guys giving guys handjobs and blowjobs through gloryholes or just out in the open.
There are 86 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
The site looks to update twice per month, if they’re being honest. |
| Cons: |
I don’t think the site is being honest. I have been told in the past to check the latest fact update on The Best Porn. This site was updated on The Best Porn in January 2016. There were 86 scenes which is the same amount there are now.
The biggest download resolution for any of the videos is 720p.
The scenes are redundant and I doubt would appeal to gay men or straight women.
The model list doesn’t work even though they have a separate “male” model list. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
It surprised me when I noticed the “gay” sites on Dogfart, but it does look like they are recycling the content on this site and possibly have been for a long time. I first noticed the videos don’t have a higher download resolution than 720p and the newest one is listed as being released on February 19, 2021. Is there a period where we look over a site recycling? I don’t understand why they list this site as still updating since several of their other sites show that they are not updating.
The scenes I did watch were poor to average. I have joined a lot of “gay” sites over the years and can say this is one of the worst. The gloryhole scenes are set in a room with what looks like a 13 inch television from decades ago. The guy who is going to give the blowjob is in that room “watching” porn and masturbating. He doesn’t seem to notice the hole in the wall right beside him until a dick pops through it then it turns into a very standard and basic blowjob/handjob. I don’t believe women are better at this type of porn, but if you watch the gloryhole scenes on this network with women they are much better than the ones with the men being the one giving the pleasure.
There are 86 scenes. The same number there was in 2016 and they do still advertise these scenes as being newly updated. The download resolution options are: 384p, 432p and 720p, all three files have 720p in the filename. There’s just a lot of dishonesty going on with this site. I felt like reviewing it would at least tell those interested in the “gay” sites on the network don’t join just for the gay sites. I’m not for sure what the ratio or interest level of gay men would be towards this network. I have read a few reviews here about gay men enjoying gloryhole porn even it’s a woman pleasuring the man. This site is the bottom of the Dogfart barrel. |
|
02-26-21 05:49am
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Photos only site with nude but not very explicit, tasteful photos of beautiful models.
Total of 2,495 photo sets and 1,072 models.
Currently averages 9-10 updates per month.
Model list and favorites section.
Photos are downloadable in zips, newest sets are 3700x5800 in resolution. |
| Cons: |
No videos with the site.They have videos, but they are staff selection videos and cost extra to download.
For a photos only site some of the photo sets are very small (30 pictures)
Most models are nude for the entire set. |
| Bottom Line: |
This seems like a site that would have been popular 10 or more years ago. The models are pretty, though hardly no variety in model types, race or body types. The photos do go fully nude, but they are not very explicit unless you consider a butt hole explicit. I noticed their updates have slowed considerably over the years. From 2018 to late 2019, they have dropped from 24 updates per month to 8-9 updates per month.
The pictures are very good quality at over 11px with 3700x5800 resolution, but the lack of videos and slowing of updates does cause some longtime concern for this site. The scenes feel like they lack imagination or vision. A lot of the poses are what I would call "non-sexual" as there's very little touching of themselves in these sets. The site is at least big with nearly 2,500 photo sets and over 1,000 models, but at times it doesn't even feel like porn. It's more like watching a woman walk around naked for no apparent reason.
The inclusion of a films tab made me think they have videos, but they do not. The films are Staff Selection and cost $3.99 to $4.99 each to view and download. You can watch a free 30 second clip of each. I was most surprised by how small some of the photo sets were, a full photo set with only 32 photos on a site that has no videos? That would be my biggest suggestion. Have larger photo sets (200-300 photos) to make up for the lack of videos.
You shouldn't have any navigation problems since there's only updates, model list and photos to go through. My overall feeling is it's not a complete site. There's something missing, more pictures or any videos. As it is, it's a back to the basics very soft photo site that doesn't even bring in many clothing fetishes. I thought this was a site like Bare Maidens where there's more of a theme to the photo sets. |
|
12-09-19 09:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Granddadz
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Older men with much younger women.
Some of the females are very pretty. I think that’s not as common in this niche.
283 scenes including a video and photo set.
Newer downloadable scenes have 4K video.
Updates had stopped from May 2020 - August 2020, but a new update arrived on August 30th, 2020 and 3 more new scenes came in September.
Better performances than I expected from the old guys.
Pictures are downloadable. |
| Cons: |
Lack of story with the scenes.
The search features are limited to using tags. Some of the tags are overused or overlapping which means I could be missing out on other scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest surprise with this site is the quality of the female models. I do not know any of these models by name, but thought Freya Dee, Adelle Sabelle, Sher Vine and Ava Black are all very pretty and gave excellent performances in their scenes. Two of those newest four scenes feature Freya Dee. She should be a star if she isn’t already.
I usually don’t have a big problem with search features, but I will mention the overused and overlapping tags. It’s common for scenes to have these three tags:
Old Guy, Old vs Young and Young Old. My problem there is all of these scenes are supposed to be older men with younger women. The tags could be more spread out. Just like having: Handjob and Masturbation. With the scenes only having 8-10 tags and up to 5 of them being the same or similar to the other tags it lightens your ability to search. Besides the tags they have a box to type in.
While there are 283 scenes, I am estimating that 80 of those are called bonus scenes. Those 80 are stream-only. All of those 80ish are not old and young. These are mixed in with the downloadable scenes.
The newer scenes offer 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. The photo sets are also downloadable. The oldest scenes offer 540p, 720p and 1080p downloads so there’s not a big dropoff in quality even in the oldest ones.
I wouldn’t complain about the missing story with each scene, but the description of each scene doesn’t even help. Why is that incredibly hot early 20s young woman in the bed with a man old enough to be her grandfather? That’s all I need is one short description.
The updates stopped for 4 months, but they have updated 4 times over the last month. This is one of the larger collections I have seen of older men with young women and even though there isn’t any story some of these scenes are very good.
You also receive access to a large stream-only portal that has over 10,000 scenes. You can check out their other old/young sites there and watch the scenes to see if their other sites are worth joining. I like it well enough to recommend it to those who enjoy the older man/younger woman niche, especially if you like an age difference that looks to be as high as 40-50 years difference in some of the scenes. |
|
10-06-20 12:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
113
|
Grandmams
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is not the older/younger I am used to. This is older women with younger men and younger women.
Pretty big site for older/younger with 216 scenes. It updates weekly.
This has some much older women in it. It even has one pegging a younger man while another younger man is giving her a rimjob.
Very good video quality, a lot of the scenes up to 4K.
The site is easy to navigate and the tags are good. |
| Cons: |
I have to think some of this is not going to be attractive especially to younger men viewers. Some of these women look close to 70. Most of them don’t.
The scenes are not consistently creative. A lot of them are just very standard sex. |
| Bottom Line: |
My thinking when I watch older men with younger women is I don’t judge the older men’s performance. I’m impressed they can even have sex. These older women are just as active and physically capable as younger women. There are some that like I mentioned, look in the upper 60s, those are not as active. I believe some of these women are sunburn old. If you know what I mean? I don’t know that I believe these are much older women. I believe many of them are probably around 50. A woman can definitely be a grandmother at 50. I see my grandmother who is in her 80s. It’s kind of like the Milf category.
The scene that really captured my attention has an older woman and she is one of the ones that looks older. She has a younger man bent over a toilet while pegging him and has another man giving her a rimjob. That’s not something you see everyday in porn. I was surprised by the number of scenes at 216 and with the weekly updates. Most of the older men with younger women sites do not update much. I always think that is because of age and inability to perform that often.
The biggest complaint I have is a lot of these scenes are just too straightforward. I don’t think I would want a story with grandmother seducing grandson. The scenes that are straightforward the only difference between those and any porn scene is it’s an older woman. There is not as many group or threesomes.
They do have some with younger women with the older women. I don’t like admitting this, but I do not find older women that attractive sexually. The site is not bad. It could play into fetishes, but I also haven’t heard many younger men say they fantasize about much older women. There’s always a few. I believe the older women works better with the younger women than younger men. The ones with the younger women those could be realistic enough to believe. They are teaching the younger woman. That is the bad part about my job. I know and understand human nature. The hormones and emotions. It’s hard to even fantasize that the nurturing grandmother seduces a young man. You need more story in these scenes. Just some kind of build-up to show the older woman has something happen that makes her aroused, and she justifies sex with the younger man in her head. Men do not have that problem. I am sorry if I am picking on men. But it’s true. Men say, “She bent over in front of me”.
The site is fine, though. It has very good quality videos and like I said, a lot of these women are not that old. Some of them even have fit bodies. It’s a different take on older/younger for me. I really like the older man/younger woman scenes. |
|
01-12-22 08:41am
Replies (0)
|
Review
114
|
Grandparents X
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is how you do older/younger porn. Some of the scenes are foursomes between an older couple and younger couple.
There are 63 scenes and videos can be downloaded.
The look on a man’s face who looks to be 70, getting a double blowjob from a woman that looks 22 and another that looks 30. That has to be the most real emotion I’ve ever seen in porn.
Videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
Updates 1-2 times per month. There are way too many morbid comments to add to that.
The scenes look genuinely fun. Especially for the old guys. |
| Cons: |
They need more updates.
The scenes could be longer.
Wondering how some of these oldest guys on these sites can even perform. These are the oldest looking guys I have seen on a site and I’ve told before I like older/younger porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
Being from India, age is not considered as big of a deal as in the United States and a lot of my earliest sexual thoughts were of older men. Some of the men on this site look like the dad’s of the older men my sexual thoughts were about. We have the big bellies, the white hair, the white eyebrows, the white beards and white chest hair. The big, saggy, floppy balls and somehow the hard as a rock dicks.
The scenes are not as creative as I think they could be. Most of the scenes are just an older woman, a young woman and a much older man. The scenes that I enjoyed the most are the ones with an older couple and younger couple. They switch partners and you have the moments where the younger woman is riding the older man while kissing the younger man who has the older woman in doggystyle. I just don’t think you are going to see that very often on porn sites.
There is very good video quality. All 63 scenes have 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. The oldest scenes makes me think they started out with the plan of this being an older/younger lesbian site. Those oldest scenes have 2-3 women and at least one is young, while the other two are older. I like this male/female style better. I believe if it was all foursomes with the swinging thrown in it could be even better. That could be an advantage to using the older guys. They can’t move around a lot. Everyone fits in the camera.
I do not know any of these models, male or female. Some of the older/younger scenes this studio makes include bisexual actions between the guys, but I haven’t seen in any of these scenes. They use Dirty Gunther in a lot of their group and younger/older scenes. He’s one of the main ones that does the male/male bisexual action. I haven’t seen him in any of these scenes. One part that’s not a complaint at all is they have some “older” men that really look more like late 40s, early 50s, which is an age range I’m usually attracted to in real life. I think that age range has landed in the tweener role now. Not quite old enough to fit the traditional older man scenes, not quite young enough to fit the standard male role in porn.
I liked it and would recommend it for those into older/younger and/or swinger porn. |
|
12-08-21 07:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
115
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It happens once a year, I get in the mood for older/younger porn and this site is another one I believe gets lost in Adult Time.
469 scenes including videos and photos.
Good selection of "grandpas" with most of the males looking old enough to be the female's grandfather.
Access to Adult Time
Newer scenes have 4K downloads if you buy the download subscription, also 1080p, 720p, 540p and on down. |
| Cons: |
Not all the grandpas look like grandpas. Is it really that difficult to find older men to have sex with young, beautiful women?
Only updated every other month.
I know it's not this site's fault, but the Adult Time navigation causes problems for me even when writing this review. |
| Bottom Line: |
The attraction of seeing older men with much younger women is one I have. It is strong enough, about one month each year, I only join sites with older men with younger women or younger women with older women.
I am going to explain that last con to show why I get so frustrated with these Adult Time sites. I was trying to find this site from the search box on Adult Time, "grandpas" was not bringing it up, "fuck teens" was not bringing it up. After 6 clicks, I finally found those sliders where I had straight sex on "do not show". I spend more time on these sites trying to fight with the navigation than downloading porn. Good business move, but annoying for the consumer.
I also do not list their 300GB per day download limit as a con. I don't think I have ever downloaded 300GB in a month.
Grandpas Fuck Teens could use some more fun and playful storylines. This is a niche that could be very fun and kinky. The scenes are a little shorter than I Ilike with most being under 25 minutes and some even below 20 minutes. That's usually the clue there's not much story. I am going to name the "grandpa" who I believe hurts this site, David Perry and any of the others who look, are built like him. Give me the white beards, the white hair, the fat bellies, the white chest hair. Those other guys look like they may be 15-20 years older than the females. Maybe I'm wrong and paying them a huge compliment? It's the visual and the mental part of this niche. To see the gorgeous, young woman looking at what our societal norms say is an unattractive man and she looks like she loves the sex with him. This is the one niche I don't believe "great performances" are needed in. And it's because of the white beards, white hair. Just seeing them get aroused and staying aroused shows the validity of the sex.
The download options are good, I either download the 720p or 1080p, depending on if I think I will really like the scene or not. I'm usually wrong on that attempt at prognosticating.
The scenes themselves are going to be limited by the mobility of the grandpa. I believe that's a strength. They're not switching positions every 5 minutes. The scenes even offer some excitement for women like me. I don't say it much, but the cumshot is one of my favorite parts. With the grandpas, any kind of cumSHOT is exciting. And you don't have the letdown if they just dribble cum since that's the expectation for their advanced ages. I usually would not directly recommend a specific scene, but the one between Bruno SX and Anastasia Brokelyn, titled "Keep Me Hot" is one of the best porn scenes I have seen from any site. He doesn't reach the exciting cumshot, but the cowgirl part of the scene on the couch is incredibly sexy as is her energy after that part. She is practically begging for his cum by the end of the scene. Maybe she has a month every year where she finds the older/younger category more interesting and it happened to be that month for her when she filmed that scene.
I do believe this is another Adult Time site that could be justified as a standalone site, but only as a one or two time join since the update rate is only one new scene per two months.
I am of the belief that Adult Time is stronger in its parts than sum. This site is one of those strong parts. |
|
06-08-21 10:46am
Replies (1)
|
Review
116
|
Grooby Archives
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If Grooby Girls is a good place to start when exploring transsexual porn, Grooby Archives is an even better second step.
Not really an archive by the definition I know of archive, updates 3 times per week. It’s more like a growing compilation site.
The best way to experience multiple Grooby sites without having to join them all. You get content here from Black TGirls, Brazilian Transsexuals, Grooby Girls and my favorite Ladyboy-Ladyboy.
Video quality does vary since the scenes are compiled from the other Grooby sites, there are a lot of HD downloads and some 4K.
Even bigger than Grooby Girls with over 8,000 models and over 40,000 videos. There are also over 2,000,000 photos.
Easy click tabs to switch from site to site so you can develop your preference. |
| Cons: |
Not for everyone, I believe it can appeal to all genders, just not all minds.
Maybe this site works against the other Grooby sites? It’s nearly enough to get the most popular content from four or five of their regular sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
While it’s not my favorite of the Grooby sites, this is the best value of the Grooby sites. You get to experience the different ethnic groups and still get a lot of content too. The video resolution shouldn’t be too big of a problem for most. I believe with the way they update this site the video resolution inconsistency can’t be avoided. I would recommend the site use a different name. Not being a native English speaker, the word archive, to me, means not updating, some place to store the older content. That is a porn-influenced definition. I would call it, “The Best of Grooby”. I don’t know if Grooby would be concerned that would make their other sites not look as good. I will say I avoided joining this site before this time. I just thought it was an old site with old content.
It does update, 3 times per week – on the same day. If you time your joining right, you can get a 5th update day in one month. Like the other Grooby sites there is a blend of action between solo and hardcore. I have said in the past, there are not enough transsexual with women scenes. There are a lot of solo scenes. That offsets the lack of with female scenes for me.
There is the other side to this site’s existence and importance or lack of. There’s a chance if you have been a member of the listed Grooby sites, you will have this content. I haven’t really run into that or experienced it much, but it has to be possible.
The best way to describe the Grooby scenes is by saying if you need a story, you’re in the wrong place. If you need a plot, you’re in the wrong place, too. If you want to look at the transsexual models in good pictures, the Grooby sites do transsexual pictures better than anyone – in my opinion. If you want to see the transsexual models masturbating and having very basic sex, they do that very well. They also offer you variety, especially on this Archive site. You have the white transsexuals that I associate with United States, parts of Europe and the UK. You get the black transsexuals. You also have the Brazilian transsexuals and the Ladyboys are usually from Asian countries. That is an advantage to me. I would feel the same way if I was watching regular straight porn. Seeing the different looks and complexions does add value for me. I think when you join a transsexual site whether you are a straight person or not, there is some newness that you don’t experience in most porn. Being able to see different types of models lets you decide which ones you like.
The site does work well, all things considered, it is a really big site. You can even see what I see and talk about just by joining this site. You can go from the archive content of Grooby Girls to the archive content of Ladyboy-Ladyboy and see how much difference there is in the way the models act. It makes Grooby Girls seem like the casting site for them. They do have some post-ops as well. I don’t really get into that, but it’s interesting. There is at least one major transsexual model that recently went through the sex change operation. I have seen her on other transsexual sites as a post-op. She is in one of the newer scenes on Grooby as a pre-op.
Overall, this is a very good site to join if you’re comfortable with transsexuals and are wanting to experience different types of transsexuals to develop your preferences. If you need one more reason to join it, it’s a little cheaper than the other Grooby sites, which I would call good marketing. This could be a site to get people more interested in the sites the archives draw from. I haven’t seen many promos on Grooby. I paid $29.95 for the Archives. The others are around $38. |
|
04-11-22 07:18pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
117
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Promoted as the longest running Trans Adult Website. I don’t doubt that.
Updates five days per week.
It also has to be one the biggest transsexual standalone sites. It has over 6,500 videos.
I signed up through Epoch by way of Paypal.
Scores points as likely a site that truly loves transsexuals and isn’t just in it for the money. They are currently celebrating their 25th anniversary. I can see that love in the photos.
4K videos going back to 2018
Hardcore and solo scenes with solo being the dominant genre. |
| Cons: |
The love of the transsexual models also shows with some of the selected models being ones I wouldn’t have filmed.
Grooby should be celebrated for their longevity, but still believe they have too many sites that require separate memberships. I spend my whole porn budget for a month just on Grooby sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I hope my bank doesn’t notice all the charges to Grooby. I did this 2 years ago and decided to do it again with a month of Grooby sites. Not a lot has changed on this one. It is the main Grooby site. I said it before, this is a really good site for someone new to transsexual porn. You do get the blend of solo and hardcore. You see a variety of models and dick sizes. You also get the different quality implants and real, hormone-filled boobs. There is so much content with over 6,500 downloadable videos. The photos also show a different look at the models compared to most transsexual sites. These photos remind me of a site like Met-Art or any of the sites that put a premium on their photos. There are not many transsexual sites that do that. I appreciate that they do. It does lead me into thinking this is a site that is very much open to all transsexuals. That’s going to be a problem for any porn site. Do you remember the first time you saw Bruce Jenner as a woman? I think that’s all I need to say. It does apply to some of the transsexuals on this site.
Seeing that I’m a straight woman with too much curiosity, I don’t know if that look is more appealing to transsexual fans. I don’t hold my honesty back. I like transsexual porn because it’s the best way to find dicks being masturbated in porn. It is difficult not to pay attention to anything else. Because of that, I believe there is a group that loves the face and overall body of the transsexuals and that’ okay with me. I just like to see prettier transsexuals. It’s a strange fetish of mine. There are all kinds of pretty transsexuals on this site. That works against the more manly-looking transsexuals. At least for me.
The quality is very good, but this is the site I was trying to think of when I talked about in another review, sites having unexplainable changes in video quality. They have 4K back until the early part of 2018 available for download. In just 2017, they didn’t have 4K, but they had 720p and 1080p. Before 2017, there are no 1080p videos. The 2016 and back are topping out at 720p. As someone that has been a member of multiple Grooby sites, this site is starting to feel more like a primer for their other sites. The scenes are short. There is not much story or theme to the scenes except sex. I believe they are going for that on this site. It’s more of a showcase that shows off the different looks of a transsexual and shows Grooby is not against any look or even subjective “quality” of the models’ looks.
It's an easy site to recommend. It just wouldn’t be my first choice. It reminds me of Nubiles if talking about solo and teen female porn. There’s not much sexual tension in the scenes. The solo scenes on this site just look like a transsexual casting to show that everything works. I do prefer several of the Grooby sites over this one. That could have been a con. The prices on these sites are high, in the $30-$36 range per site. I do want to reiterate that I believe this is a great site for someone new to transsexual porn and wanting to experience the different types of transsexuals. I don’t think it’s even a top 5 site for transsexual fans. The other Grooby sites are better for those that have more of defined taste that they prefer in transsexuals. There isn’t much to complain about other than subjective taste. I do believe that’s a problem with reviewing porn sites. We have that score up there that we judge the sites with. I like the site. I like seeing the promotion of transsexuals. The positive promotion. It doesn’t strike me as hot porn. This site feels more like a meet and greet. Grooby hurts themselves there. They have sites with sexual tension. It’s a good starting point for someone interested in transsexuals. |
|
04-11-22 07:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
118
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This has to be the biggest transsexual site.
Over 2,000 models and over 6,000 scenes.
Interesting way of releasing and categorizing scenes: Climax Mondays, Tryout Tuesdays, Post-Op, Hardcore and Model of the Month.
Some of the prettiest transsexuals I have ever seen.
They update 6 days a week.
Scenes with women having sex with the transsexuals. |
| Cons: |
Some of the least attractive transsexual models I have ever seen. I am sure the large number of models goes into this.
The site goes beyond overwhelming. I do not know the word for beyond overwhelming. It does hurt the usage and navigation of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is supposed to be the best, the biggest and oldest transsexual porn site on the internet. It says it has been around since 1995. The first scene that I noticed led me to join despite a fairly high price. It has Joanna Angel from Burning Angel in a threesome with two transsexuals.
I went to the advanced search since I can’t find any categories. Surprising and a little disappointing, there are only 9 scenes with transsexuals having sex with women and one is the Joanna Angel scene. They made up for that when I searched for solo and they have over 600 solo scenes. Some of these solo scenes are unbelievably good. One has very large boobs that look natural, an 8 inch dick and she cums 3 times without stopping.
In doing a direct comparison to Ladyboy Gold which I also joined and reviewed, the models here – overall, are not as attractive to me as Ladyboy Gold’s models, but that is just a subjective preference.
I do think part of that is because these are transsexuals and not ladyboys. A lot of these models have a more masculine frame and build. It’s not the case with all of the models though. Some of these girls look like teen girls I have seen on solo teen girl sites like Nubiles.
It has only happened a couple of times, but I think should be mentioned. When going to download a file a screen pops up that says they don’t recognize my machine and they have to send an email with a code for me to input. I have used the same computer each time I have been on the site. Their quality is very high starting with a 480p file that goes up to 4K and that’s on all of the newer scenes I have watched. You can download or stream. They also have photo sets you can download of each scene and screencaps that can be downloaded too.
I did find the Post-Op section to be interesting and wonder how many straight males would be into that. They did a good job on the surgery.
The advanced search is expansive, and it works. You can even make multiple selections in it with choices like cock size (small, average, 7.5+) hair color, type of action, so it really shouldn’t be this overwhelming but it is and I think so because there are quite a few of the models I don’t find attractive.
They include a bonus section with content from other transsexual sites. I have never thought this was a good idea since the competitor is probably sending their best content.
I do think I am being a little hard on the attractiveness part and want to explain that. They have so many models, if I picked out the ones, I find attractive, it would probably be a higher number than any other transsexual site.
They also have a full model list which does not help me much since it would take forever to go through 2,000 models. They do seem to do everything right though.
One part I find confusing and maybe it’s a non-issue. When I first heard of Grooby Girls it was on T-Girl Japan. I want to think the content from that site is on this Grooby Girls site since it said Grooby on it, but I’m not for sure it is. When you look at how many site Grooby has, over 40, you have to wonder if that means you have to join each of those sites to get the specific content. This would be a major negative to me since all of their sites are over $30. I do think that is the case. When I use the advanced search, it has three countries listed, the UK, Spain and the United States. I did reduce the score for this. If they can tell me I was wrong in this assumption, I will add some points back. It seems crazy to think you would have to spend over $1,000 just to get all their content.
I can recognize their importance to the transsexual niche, but that’s just too much content spread out across many sites. |
|
07-15-20 04:12am
Replies (2)
|
Review
119
|
Group Sex Games
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the hottest group sex sites I have seen.
It has 258 scenes and is updating 2 times per month.
The oldest scenes/lowest video quality are 720p max, most have 720p and 1080p
Very attractive models including the males. The males are not as attractive as the females. These are Europeans, I believe.
The scenes are usually creative. Some are not.
The outdoor scenes are the best by far. The indoor scenes seem to be less creative. |
| Cons: |
I think they have removed some videos, maybe added some, flipped some around. The oldest video on the site has 720 and 1080. Some of the newer ones only have up to 720. It is still such a unique site. I am not going to let that hurt the score that much.
Camerawork is I think always an issue when there are more than 2-3 people in a scene. You only see part of the action. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site mostly interests me for the creativity in the scenes. It feels like two different sites in some parts. Some of the scenes have outdoor games the models play. They start having sex as they mess up or the other person scores. It’s enough of a “story” to make the scenes make sense. The games they play are not really interesting. They are not there to be competitive or see who really can win. They are just going through the motions to set up the sex. I like scenes with more than 2 people. I think that breaks the boredom of porn. If you get bored watching those 2, you can watch those 2. I wish an American site would do scenes like this. Where dialogue would add to it. This seems like a niche that is not covered enough. We have 600 sites about stepfamilies.
I read the previous review and noticed the scene count was over 300. Now, there are only 258. I don’t have an explanation. I don’t know if these new scenes are really new or are just old scenes they are reposting. The inconsistency in the video resolution did make me look into it. I do not see any with 4K. Most of the sites on this network have 4K on newer scenes. I still find a lot of value in these scenes. I am glad I found the site while it has 258 scenes. The older scenes are very long. I downloaded one that is 3 hours long. It shows how much work and sex and games there are in the scenes. I would also guess that’s why no one is making this type of porn.
I feel like Adult Prime has so many sites it is easy to miss a site like this one. This is probably the only porn I have seen in this niche. It does change some. The indoor games I have seen before on other sites. I will not download those.
Most of the scenes have 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads. A few do not have the 1080p option. Considering the length of these scenes, I don’t know that you would want to download the 1080p and especially not 4K. I don’t recognize any of the models. There was maybe one or two, I thought I recognized. Some of the games are games most people played when they were younger. There is a picnic scene where they play spin the bottle, it is outdoors, there are 3 women and 2 men. The scene is 140 minutes long. This is the one that I think I recognize the women in it. Cindy Hope, Nesty and Colette, very pretty women and to see them play a game most of us have played except instead of kissing, you do something sexual. I like it a lot. The length of the scenes could be a con to some. You do watch them playing the game. Not being able to understand whatever language they speak, hurts, it does have subtitles, but they are one the screen all at one time. I’m not for sure who is who.
I would recommend as high as possible for those that want something creative, fun and different. These scenes had to take hours and hours and lots of money to make. I wish I had looked at it sooner. |
|
01-12-22 08:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
120
|
Hogtied
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best bondage sites available.
Comes with the Kink network.
Updates twice per month and has a huge back catalog of over 1,300 scenes, they have been releasing scenes here since 1998!
Very graphic positions that show everything.
One of the few sites that convinces me this pain is pure pleasure.
Great selection of models including many you wouldn't expect to see on a bondage site.
Very easy join and cancel options, it's much improved over how it was a year or so ago. |
| Cons: |
Kink's sites are plagued with one common con. They are niche-orientated and can become repetitive.
I would like to see more action between the male and female, most of the scenes are simply the male using a vibrator or powered dildo on the hogtied female. |
| Bottom Line: |
While watching some of these scenes I realized that Kink uses almost no airbrushing or cover-up on the models and I think it's why I like the network show much. One of the newer scenes has a model that looks like she recently gave birth to a child or was once very overweight. She has stretch marks on her stomach, very attractive model and instead of covering those stretch marks they seem to make a point of showing them throughout the scene. It's a refreshing twist in the body image dominated porn land.
This site is huge. It's hard for me to even comprehend some of this content was released when I was underage! Major points for making me feel young!
The concept is simple. The rope master or vibrator king ties a woman up in a sexual position, he then uses a vibrator, sometimes a powered dildo and then they switch her position. This is where you see their experience. The camera zooms in right as the powered dildo penetrates the model. The orgasms get full attention. There is use of hot wax, there are positions men are always talking about not seeing enough of like the model laying on her stomach with her ass up in the air complete with a perfect back arch.
It's as erotic and sexy as you can make women being tied up and "abused".
The videos are downloadable in multiple resolutions, the top is only 1280x720, but those do have a 5000+ bitrate and are very clear. They have four other smaller options to download as well. The scenes are relatively long (40-50 minutes).
My biggest complaint is I would like to see more action between the male and female. I know it would be hard to get the guy into position to have sex with the hogtied woman, but I think it would break some of the monotony.
The models do a good job of getting themselves into sexy positions. I think the best is on their knees with their feet under the ass and pussy sticking out. It seems to be the one that works best for the model too.
I have to think this is the one of the longest running, still-updating sites there is with scenes from 22 years ago and still 2 new updates per month. I think the scene with Alexis Tae might be worth the price of the membership by itself. She seems genuinely innocent and new to bondage. The male is quite rough with her, but she is very much into it and you can see her becoming more into it as the scene goes.
The scenes also include a downloadable zip of images, some of the older scenes don't have them, but the majority do. It's a site that doesn't seem like it would be very erotic and it might not be to some, but I like it a lot. I didn't score it as high as some of the other Kink sites as the niche is very narrow and repetitiveness does create the feeling of some of the scenes being too similar. They do include waterboarding, ball gags and throw just about everything at the model -- while she's hogtied.
A very good site overall. |
|
11-12-19 12:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
121
|
Holed
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many beautiful American models. I found them all to be outstanding.
Segpay is the biller.
168 updates with a trailer and a photoset for each video
Fast downloads and easy navigation.
Nice production values, enjoyable scenes.
All videos available for download up to 4K |
| Cons: |
Prechecked cross sale where you don’t expect it. There is a drop down box for yes or no.
I wish these sites would either start naming the filenames what the scene is or hire someone to come organize these scenes for me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t usually look for anal focused sites, but it was interesting anyway. The site is very professional in its production values as well as the selection of models.
There are many beautiful American models, 122 to be precise. Some I did not know, but many were big names in the industry. As I am sure people know by now, I am a collector of some favorite models and I found some videos here that I have never seen before. The ultimate pro Jynx Maze has three scenes that were new to me. A few others were quite good starring Kendra Spade and Chloe Amour. I loved Asian May Thai and hope I can find more of her scenes. She has that natural Asian petite look that I find irresistible, and she is a great performer as well. I would have preferred more ethnic variety, but at least there were a few scenes with MILFs for a variety in age. It would be hard for me to recommend the site by itself unless you're a collector. They have a few models I collect and this content is exclusive.
The technical quality is as high as you will find. The oldest video on the site has the typical 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K options and a 720p WMV option as well. I am happy with 720 HD, but some feel a need for the best quality available.
In June and July there were three updates. The older videos are not dated, so I don’t know what is happening here. At the moment there are 168 updates and as many photo sets for each. You do get value for your money, even if it eventually becomes an archive site.
Downloads were very fast and were as fast as my computer can operate. I was able to max out my system at about 80 to 85 percent.
I think they could make it easier by letting you pick your username and password. As it is, you have randomly generated usernames and passwords that you have to keep going back to look them up to enter them. I also would have liked if the file names were all unique. I did not see any reason to have to rename every video download. They also don’t have any scene descriptions, so you are not sure what you will get. At least there is a trailer for each video.
I found many interesting scenes, it's a good site overall. |
|
08-12-20 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
122
|
Home Toy Teens
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fresh and very pretty young teen models that I have never seen before.
The videos are a lot of fun to watch
I love to see real orgasms and masturbation
Vendo is the biller and I have had good experiences using them
There is a photo set for each video.
Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites. |
| Cons: |
Archive site that last updated in 2009
Only 73 videos. Not all are even HD 1280x720
There is no PornUsers discount, but you can find one on the internet. |
| Bottom Line: |
I love this site as it uses a depraved sense of humor. I love the weird and offbeat and this is the most fun site I have seen in a long time. Because the site is an archive that is no longer updating, I have to say that I wish it was still going strong.
In 2020 every single woman and nearly every married one has at least one drawer full of her little “friends’. Now they need batteries and have all different speeds and types. Some vibrate and others simulate you getting your pussy licked. Ten years from now we will be able to use toys that I cannot even imagine today.
This site is now eleven years old. Times were not so complex or organized then and our older sisters had to make do with whatever they could find. That is what this site shows in all its glory. They used a wide variety of dildos in all kinds of sizes and shapes. If you did not have a dildo, you had to get imaginative. These very pretty women use cucumbers, shampoo bottles, hair spray bottles, hair brushes, can openers, make up bottles, pears, blush brushes, cans of shaving cream, karaoke microphones, small statues, apple pieces, cans of hairspray, hammer handles, spray bottles, television remote controls, lint rollers, condiment bottles holding some kind of sauce, mascara tubes, glasses, knife handles, corkscrews, leeks mistakenly called an onion here, and eggplants. In one scene a nurse uses a medical baumanometer for taking blood pressure. I have a pretty good imagination, but that one made me laugh. Nearly all the scenes are vaginal but a few are anal.
With only 73 videos and not all of them in even weak HD quality, I wish there were more. I feel this is very female friendly as it shows imagination and the empowerment of women sexually. When we get the urge we will do whatever is necessary. These women give us ideas and are examples of positive women role models in porn. The site should post new scenes and remaster the older videos.
There is no talking in the scenes as is often the case with European porn. I found the women to be very attractive and very much setting the right mood for me. Highly recommended and I think guys would like it too. As the name says, fun begins with home toys. |
|
09-11-20 09:45am
Replies (0)
|
Review
123
|
Homemade Anal Whores
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly features James Deen with some of porn’s best female models
Only 67 scenes, but the models do make up for it and most scenes are long.
No 4K, but all scenes have 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
Has kind of a diary type feel to it like James just invited these women over to his place and they decided to have sex.
Repeated models with multiple scenes are some of the ones I really like. |
| Cons: |
It's a dead site, I believe. The dates show, but not the year and the newest is from March. This is February, I am guessing that is an older video. Also, the no 4K while most of the sites on here have 4K.
The site loads slower than the other sites on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an interesting site that is buried on this network. The name makes it interesting -- homemade. The camera/filming style is along the lines of homemade porn, but by no means is bad. It looks like the pro said. Like it’s some kind of sex diary. Several models have multiple scenes and all scenes look to be in the same house. The titles of the scenes are even intriguing. One scene is James Dean with Abella Danger and it is titled, Abella Danger Passionate Amateur Sex. How long ago would it have to be for James or Abella to be classified as amateur? They are two of the handful of porn stars I recognize easily by name. The scene is very good too.
One thing to make a note of, the watermark on it says DTF Sluts, which is a site the company that owns this network also owns and was one of the sites I was hoping to get with Analized. It’s because I have seen scenes like this from DTF Sluts and the scenes are quite erotic while keeping an edge to them and not falling into that genre, I call softer hardcore. I don’t know if all the scenes from this site are from the company’s other sites, but it is a very good site. The scenes last 30-50 minutes. And it’s mostly all sex. I was thinking maybe there would be interviews since the woman shows up at what I assume is James’ house or condo. There is a more personal feel to the scenes like he knows these women personally and while rough, it never turns into the trying to prove something his testosterone level like many of the other scenes from the sites on this network do.
It reminds me more of a guy is getting lucky with some very pretty and sexy women. He doesn’t want to risk doing anything that will stop them from answering his calls. That personal touch, kind of removes the porn feeling. All of these women are well-known porn models. Chanel Preston has multiple scenes. Ava Addams and Mystica Jade. I don’t think it’s that old of content. You can download in 1080p and one of the newer scenes is a sexy scene with Kira Noir, who is very attractive.
It's all too typical that this would be the one that’s not updating, anymore. I feel like these networks find something good and decide to stop it, maybe come back to it later. From looking at the scenes on James Deen’s site, I don’t get the same feeling as I get from these scenes. This site may be his best work. It’s sexy and I don’t find him attractive at all, but the mood and the quietness of the scenes. The one with Abella is probably worth joining just for it. I haven’t really seen her like this. She is usually pretty dominant and aggressive. She’s more toned down, moaning, passionate like the scene title says. I even think the no pictures with scenes makes it seem that much more like it’s not porn. It’s his personal life. Very good site that is probably better than the rest of the network combined. It shows me my negative feelings towards the other sites on this network are probably validated by this. The other scenes on the other sites are robotic and forced feeling. You get this more natural feel from these scenes, and you can see why the other sites do not give as good of an impression. I have the other network from them. I just joined it a few days ago and won’t review any of it yet. |
|
02-05-22 11:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
124
|
Honey Trans
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network of 8 sites that I have to say is likely underrated by many or just not known of.
Most niches and fetishes are covered on the 8 sites and I like nearly all of them.
Newer videos have downloads up to 4K
There are 2,025 scenes across the 8 sites.
Some very pretty trans models on Honey Trans and Trans Roomates. Most models on the network are also pretty and attractive.
One of the best value sites I’ve joined this year.
Good update rate, but it’s not that clear. You just see the new scenes. |
| Cons: |
They need a catchy network name as their hub page. A lot of this content isn't transsexual. They have a big audience out there.
More for the visual arousal. There’s not much story or lead-in. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start by saying it’s almost unfair of me to review this under Honey Trans. The network has over 2,000 scenes and only a little over 500 are transsexual scenes. I know that transsexual can turn some people away. These are the sites included and how many scenes they have: Honey Trans with 410 scenes, Trans Roommates with nearly 100 scenes. Japan Lust with over 650 uncensored Japanese hardcore scenes. Cuck Hunter has around 100 scenes. Over 130 on their site JOI Babes. Over 300 on their lesbian site Les Worship. They have 80 unique Nude Yoga Porn scenes and around 100 POV Masters scenes.
That’s a nice blend of niches and genres. The price is also not bad and the biller is Segpay. I have not had any problems with them. They have photos that you can download in zips. It looks like they are doing everything right except having a catchy network name that brings all the content together.
I like Honey Trans a lot. They have solo transsexual scenes blended in with transsexual with transsexual. The models are mostly Asian and Spanish. Their other transsexual site is all hardcore and is Trans Roommates. It’s an interesting site you don’t usually see much interaction in transsexual porn other than the sex. These transsexuals really seem to know each other. I don’t know if they really are roommates or not. The location is different in nearly every scene.
The Yoga site is probably more aimed at men. I was a little surprised by the content. A lot of these women are heavier than the regular size we see in porn. There also are some very hairy women. I think I look at Nude Yoga as young, very fit women. I didn’t get a lot out of that. There are a few cute models on it. Japan Lust is one to checkout. The scenes are close to an hour each and are fully uncensored. Those are straightforward porn scenes. Some of the models are very pretty. There’s some squirting too.
Les Worship seems to go more with the cookie cutter style. Nearly all the scenes are 30 minutes. It looks like they are just doing what is scripted. That’s a shame, I don’t recognize most of these models and some are really cute and pretty. I also felt like POV Masters was cookie cutter. Neither are bad, it’s just you’ve probably seen similar and know what’s going to happen next.
JOI Babes is the one that surprised me the most, but I will say they are limiting the length of their scenes and editing parts out. Nearly all scenes on JOI Babes are 20 minutes and X seconds. Those are good if you like JOI which is Jerk Off Instruction. I agree with other that this genre of porn is also good for women. These are not the ultra-pretty JOI tease type models. These women masturbate with you. I prefer that in JOI. The models on the site are the surprising part. There are heavier/curvier women and older, I think. A few of the women are known by name.
There’s a lot here especially if you like a specific genre they have. You get it and 6 other niches/genres. The videos can be downloaded up to 4K on the newer scenes. The one that I noticed has no 4K is Japan Lust, but those do have HD downloads. The ones with pictures can be downloaded in zips.
It's a good and different network. I thought I was just getting Honey Trans when I joined it, but the other 7 also come with it. Very good network if you like different niches and genres especially. |
|
07-12-22 05:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
125
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A surprising site that reminds me of what would happen if Pure Taboo was toned down some.
Only 67 scenes, but most of them are worth downloading.
Multiple “taboos” explored including stepfamily, crazy girlfriend and big dick cravings.
Scenes come with a video and photo set. All can be downloaded and it’s unlimited.
CCBill is the biller.
Comes with Nubile Films so it’s a good buy when added to Nubile Films. |
| Cons: |
The next surprise, they aren’t updating it anymore.
Would have liked to see other taboos like older/younger. |
| Bottom Line: |
They do a good job of making a lighter, more accessible version of Pure Taboo. The crazy girlfriend ones are the best on here since we know there’s no such thing as crazy boyfriends. They do lean a little too heavily on cliches. One of the crazy girlfriends is going to burn down the boyfriend’s house since he hasn’t texted or called her. She forgives him within a few minutes. He tells her they can start over. She (cliche) asks if they can start a family. They have sex and he pulls out for the cumshot on her belly. She flips the crazy switch since she wanted the cum in her and starts scraping the cum into a bottle. It’s very light-hearted compared to other sites I have seen. The stepfamily scenes are pretty good. They stick to the typical stories on those too like “lets try it!” It reminds me of Bollywood acting. Which is not a compliment. I sometimes wonder with sites like this one if anyone ever thought to do scenes about a crazy boyfriend or a crazy ex-boyfriend who happened to make a second copy of the girl’s house key and pays her a visit.
The scenes are fun. The girls are cute and young looking. They even seem like they are having fun with the stories. I do find porn more interesting when the models look like they’re enjoying themselves.
The video quality on downloads is 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. What doesn’t make any sense is they don’t have 4K videos, but the screen captures for these scenes are 3840x2160 which is 4K. If their screen captures are 4K why aren’t their videos?
I think you have to look at this site as a very nice addition to Nubile Films. I don’t know if they ran out of taboo ideas and decided to stop updating Hot Crazy Mess, but I have seen much worse porn that is still being updated.
I would join this site by itself. I like the taboo scenes even if they’re not that believably taboo and aren’t near as intense as sites like Pure Taboo. It only takes a little story to keep me interested and they do that here. If you try Nubile Films be sure to check out the content on this site too. I prefer this site’s content to the scenes on Nubile Films. I would like to know why they stopped updating it or if maybe they will restart it as part of Nubile Films. The variety is a welcome change. |
|
10-05-20 09:48pm
Replies (2)
|
|
