| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Dud Cast
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Routine, casting-type site
Currently is updating 6 times a month
“Amateur” models (I recognize several of them) that I believe are speaking Russian
Subtitles for the talking parts
Multiple camera angles for good or bad
Videos are 1080p or 720p and are downloadable
Most of the models are young and cute |
| Cons: |
The multiple camera angles sometimes messes up the view
No 4K (possibly recycling?)
I never figured out the “dud” part
A model with as known of a name as Gina Gerson is on this site, but they don’t even list her by name until the description of the scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
This came with Doc Squirt and I believe the XFeeds.net site also gives access to the same sites. This one does make me wonder about the new updates. Longtime PU members have talked about the video quality often pointing to older videos being recycled. Most of the sites in this small network have a 4K video option, but this one doesn’t, yet they show 6 new updates over the last month. I will review the XFeeds.net site separately as it shows the full list of problems these potentially good sites are having.
I would like an explanation on the “dud” part of the name. I was expecting something along the lines of guys that were having trouble keeping it up or ones that started having performance anxiety. Also, with the way they show the site “her first time”, I was expecting female models that were hesitant, maybe even believably shy, but what I got was a normal casting site with an older man (maybe he’s the dud?), casting younger women and they do try to add a story of them talking the model into the scene. The older man doesn’t have sex with all of the models. He sometimes has a guy he calls his “nephew” also in the scenes. One scene I watched ended with the older casting man, simply known as “agent”, say, “You both were great” where’s the dud?
This is also not a large site. It’s quite small with 36 scenes. I do think that puts more emphasis on the importance of whether those “new” scenes are really new or not. The scenes may even go too much into a story, which I’m usually complaining there’s not enough of. The scenes are under 30 minutes and you can expect 10 of those minutes to be the setup. Some of the scenes just read like (from the translated subtitles) they picked a hooker up. One of the women says her cost is 800 Euros per day. I’m not for sure anything can get lost in that translation.
The videos even without 4K are very clear in the 1080p format. The camera angles are probably done for effect, but I don’t see any major benefit from them. They have one camera angle from the ceiling that looks like a security cam view. There’s the older agent guy carrying a handheld camera and there does seem to be at least one other camera view. There isn’t much bouncing camera which is why I believe there’s another camera. It’s not full point-of-view even when the agent is the one having sex. It’s not a bad site, but the group of sites combined, even the discount here on Porn Users, still feels underwhelming. |
|
02-09-21 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
77
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Reply
It's probably because you seemed to be more interested in the lesbian scenes while I was more interested in the solo scenes.
|
04-30-20 08:27am
|
Reply
78
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thank you, I could see the lower scores more than the higher scores. I didn't join it for the cam shows, but I had noticed several of those high scoring reviews have the Playdate listed as a pro even though you have to pay a lot to interact with the Playdate and the high scoring ones don't mention that.
This site has quite a bit of media coverage. They even list their appearances in magazines and newspapers. They're promoted as a female-friendly porn site. I think if they fixed the split scenes and lowered the price it would have got a better score from me, but who wants to watch a woman masturbate for 12 minutes, then she stops and you have to find the other 12 minute video to watch the rest of her masturbation? The interviews also are standard fare for porn sites. I thought they would ask interesting questions. They ask, "Why did you decide to get in porn?" And some of the interviews are around 20 minutes long.
|
04-30-20 08:26am
|
Review
79
|
Ersties
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly amateur models in solo, male/female, lesbian, group scenes.
Some of the women are very attractive. There is more of a natural look going on here.
Bills through Epoch.
Daily updates and good tagging system.
The solo scenes and especially outdoors solo are the best scenes on here for me.
If you like the site a lot, the 3 month deal for $45 is a good deal. |
| Cons: |
If you are hesitant and only join for one month, it's going to set you back $35.
Besides the tagging system, the overall navigation is not user-friendly and is confusing.
The much hyped "playdate" feature is a free cam show until the model decides you have to pay to see more. Kind of like Chaturbate.
I was attracted to the real couples chemistry aspect of their advertising, they have more solo scenes than male/female, lesbian, threesomes and orgies combined.
I'm straight, maybe bi-curious at times and found none of the men attractive.
Scenes are split for no particular reason.
I also don't care for the whimsical, pastel, layout of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems to be a very polarizing site. A brief thought on that, I do like some of the content. I especially found the model Anya to be very attractive and sensual in her newest scene.
After that, a lot of the problems come from what is a business model I don't appreciate. Besides charging $35 for 1 month, there's the Playdate feature that they heavily advertise. If you go to the model list, the first 3 blocks are upcoming Playdates. These are live so you have to be online when they have it. I was able to make it to a recent one. Each one has the words, "Free Live Show" on it. I signed in to watch and was taken to a screen that said:
There are three types of playdates
#1 Free Playdates:
These playdates are open, varied and influenced by you, the viewer! If you want the opportunity to determine the course of the playdate, then make sure you have some Ersties Coins added to your account!
#2 Ticket Playdates:
These shows will be prepared by the Ersties Models themselves, allowing you a front row seat as the models indulge the naughty exhibitionist side of their kinky personality.
Tickets can be purchased in advance of the show using coins from your membership account.
#3 Private Playdates:
If you enjoy an Ersties Playdate and want to get the model a little more intimately, you can invite them to a private 1-on-1 playdate!
If a model offers 1-on-1 playdates, this will be displayed at the bottom of this page.
The tokens or coins cost anywhere from 90 for $15 to 960 for $150. Isn't that just like any cam show? They also have Ersties Cams.
I do believe that's important to the review since you are not told you will have to buy tokens to interact with these Playdates. I wouldn't be as negative about it if they didn't also have Ersties Cams. It makes Playdates look like it's something different.
The site itself, they do solo porn well, but they do have the scenes cut into parts. These parts are not used to switch outfits or locations. One of the recent scenes, a woman lays on the couch and masturbates. The scene stops, the next part of the scene, she is bent over the chair masturbating right beside the couch she was on. She didn't even put her clothes back on.
There are interviews on every scene and they are a separate video. They don't list the number of interviews (no tag for it), but this is what they do list: 639 solo scenes, 384 lesbian scenes, 59 boy/girl, 26 threesomes, 9 orgies. These numbers are not determinations of how many of those scenes they have since most have multiple parts. For instance: Mona and Vanessa In Action 1, Mona and Vanessa In Action 2. Just like the solo scene described above, these two videos are in the same location. It gets halfway through the full scene and stops, then you have to go find part 2 of it. They do not always release them back to back. For instance: Layla and Mae In Action 1 was released and Layla and Mae In Action 2 had 16 other scenes released between In Layla and Mae In Action 1 and Layla and Mae In Action 2.
A lot of the lesbian scenes are good, but who knows how many parts I'm going to miss when my membership expires? They have a Christmas lesbian anal scene that has 4 parts. It looks like the 3rd part came out about six weeks ago, in March.
I do like that they're exploring more into public scenes. I really enjoyed the Rebecca In Action 1 scene of a pretty model masturbating on a train. They also have a lesbian library scene that I liked a lot.
If they start doing more of these risky scenes, it will at least give me interest in coming back, maybe even for 3 months. I also like their group/orgy scenes. A few other notes I've seen advertised include BDSM. They have 15 BDSM scenes and those are split, making it more like 7 or 8.
The navigation is a problem because they group lesbians together, then list them separate if they have a solo scene. Clicking on the scene does show all their scenes, solo, lesbian, etc, but there's no way to figure out how many models they have since one model could be listed solo, then again in lesbian. The scenes can't be counted since most of them have multiple parts to one scene.
I'm not really into or against "natural" models, but in the tags there are 606 scenes listed with shaved pubic hair, 310 with trimmed pubic hair and 230 listed as hairy.
There's something that just doesn't feel right about their advertising. With that said, the scenes overall are okay and would possibly be very good if they didn't split them. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
The best way to finish this up is my membership is about to expire. They released an interview of Caireen and Mirah, it also has a scene of them showering together and Caireen going down on Mirah, but that's In Action 1. Which means I won't likely have my membership when In Action 2 comes out. It's like watching a soap opera or television series. Maybe a longer membership would be the answer? It's an average site with potential for me. |
|
04-19-20 02:40am
Replies (4)
|
Review
80
|
Euro Angels
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I have been a member of this network many times, but never noticed this site of very pretty European models in hardcore and lesbian scenes.
It is not updating, but it has 611 scenes. It is hard to quantify the difference between large sites with no updates and small sites with weekly updates. There is a lot here that is good.
Good differential in the time of the scenes, some are as short as 20 minutes, some are as long as 40 minutes. I have a theory at this point of my porn viewing and collecting hobby about that difference.
There is good kinkiness in these scenes which I don’t see as much in hardcore scenes from American models. A lot of niches are covered.
A lot of big name stars on this site, including some I didn’t know identified as European.
It’s my last pro, but it is the one I like the best. A lot of these scenes have more than two people in them. I think I have just reached boredom with one on one scenes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating, there is some good news, the majority of the scenes have HD downloads.
These are from DVDs based on the names of the scenes, but there is no continuity between the scenes. That is a part of porn I don’t understand.
This could be a pro or con. If you are familiar with sites like 21 Sextury, this is a lot like it and even features similar models but is a little kinkier. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not for sure about the validity of the name of this site. It is Euro Angels, but the first scene I noticed features Lisa Ann, who is an American. Maybe the other scenes from that DVD are mostly European models. I usually recognize maybe 20-25% of models by name. I recognize a lot of these including a male that I know is in a lot of scenes on 21 Sextury, named Choky Ice. This is professional porn. You’re not going to get much story.
You do get a lot of action. I believe this is impressing me from all the generic, I think it’s called heartcore or softcore-hardcore, that just seems like two people having regular sex. This site brings the porn part back into focus. There are threesomes, foursomes, two couples, that is porn to me. There are some one on one scenes and even some solo scenes. You still a lot more of the more than 2 people scenes. Showing the categories, I think, gives an idea of what I’m trying to say. Of the 611 scenes: 275 have anal, 52 have dual penetration, 13 have double blowjob, 23 are group sex, 113 are lesbian, 59 are solo, 52 are threesomes, that’s a good mixture. That, for me, is missing from most standard hardcore sites.
I was concerned about the video quality. About half of the scenes have HD, the ones before those are 480p. It’s worth a look. There are scenes on this site that I will keep over some of the newer scenes in high quality, just based on the energy and porn feeling of the scenes. I think the best ones are the two couples. They don’t swap. It’s two couples having sex on the same or adjacent couches. That is kinky to me. My theory on the different length scenes is I have noticed if a site has scenes that are all almost the same length (2-3 minutes difference), it’s very repetitive and planned out. I don’t care if every scene is planned just don’t make me has a reason to see that. There are hardcore sites where at 8 minutes, the oral stops, at 12 minutes the woman goes into cowgirl, at 20 minutes it’s doggystyle and at 23 minutes, the cumshot. On this site there is as much as a 20-30 minute difference in scenes. Just from watching the scenes I can see that there is a difference. We talk about using our imaginations. Doing the same thing at the same time in each scene shuts my imagination off. I already know what the next position will be. It’s a site not to overlook. |
|
01-12-22 08:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
Evil Angel
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Possibly my favorite current network. Excellent job of different niches and genres.
Very impressive quality and quantity: 19,946 scenes and everything after 2011 has at least HD 720 and 1080, with the newer scenes having 4K. Updates are 1-2 times per day.
Seems like they accidentally stumbled into being one of the best transsexual sites, even with all the straight scenes too.
Some of the producer sites that don’t have listings here really stand out to me like the Dana Vespoli produced scenes.
The navigation is very good. You can go from site to site and it has so many filters (models, categories) that you can click as not wanting to see or wanting to see.
There’s not hardly any of their sites that should be overlooked. Everything on this network is at least worth looking into. |
| Cons: |
You have to look for cons on this network. Maybe you could say there’s overuse of certain models, especially the males.
They could have better pictures, even professional quality, photo sets would add to it. |
| Bottom Line: |
Evil Angel’s original draw for me was the transsexual content. They have TS Playground, Transsexual Angels and TS Factor which is one that is easy to overlook. They have the new, but I think underwhelming, PansexualX. Those transsexual sites have a total of 2,491 scenes and of those 2,491, 1,086 are solo which I really like and 248 are transsexual with a woman. I don’t know if there is another site that has that much of those two niches in the transsexual genre on one site. I know the network has long been known for their hardcore content, but they have as impressive of a transsexual collection as most transsexual networks. They also have 65 bisexual male scenes. I was just on a bisexual male site that only had 43 scenes.
I mentioned the Dana Vespoli directed scenes. There are 209 of those, it’s advertised as “Smart sexy features, intimate female orientated sex”. It’s really some of the most hardcore sex I have seen. That is important. If it was degrading or disgusting, I wouldn’t watch it. I think these scenes are right at my limit for what is almost too hardcore. I do like that.
I don’t think they would mind that I say I like this network better than Adult Time. Both are owned by the same company. This one has less of the same type of porn. Every update is likely going to be different than the previous one. It’s one of the only sites or networks that I check the updates each day. They have a 1-2 new updates per day schedule. The video quality is very high.
I haven’t ever been that focused on navigation in my reviews. This network is that good at navigation. It has to be talked about. It looks overwhelming at first. Everything I have checked, works on the navigation. There is the one problem you should be aware of. It has the sliders that you can set for bisexual only, lesbian only, transsexual only. I have opened different channels/sites on the network to see nothing. It’s because I had the filters set to just show bisexual. If you are into the different genres that is an invaluable tool. The categories are good. It is very close to being a perfect site.
Besides the nearly 20,000 scenes, they have 6,045 models. I like that there is an ethnic blend in the models. Their latest models show the depth of models they have. One is Eden Ivy, who is a pretty, college to mid-20s looking white model. The second newest Anuskatzz, who is nearly completely covered with tattoos, the polar opposite of Eden Ivy. The third latest or newest is Isabella Fontana, who is a Latin, very pretty transsexual. If you go just a little further there is Alicia Reign, who is a either a Latina or biracial maybe. The model variance is like the scene variance. You get something different with the site. I do plan on keeping my year membership. I replaced my year Kink membership with a year to Evil Angel. It is the only year membership I currently have.
There are what I call, “Neanderthalic” scenes, especially in the older scenes. That kept me from joining long-term in the past. I don’t even mean the word disrespectfully. It’s a non-emotional, non-feeling, cold version of porn that reminds me of what the cavemen did. While most sites have decreased in quality it seems like this network just keeps getting better. |
|
01-12-22 08:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
82
|
Evil Angel
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this site and have to say I feel completely overwhelmed.
I like a lot of hardcore porn -- I also like some transsexual and like most women, the male/male/female bisexual scenes too. They have all of them!
My account, joined on Halloween special, says 14,760 scenes, they have 60 male/male/female bisexual and 2,096 transsexual scenes. This will take me years to go through!
The site works well enough to be able to find those numbers above just by sliding a simple slider, but there's a lot of options on here I don't understand. I don't know who any of these directors are. |
| Cons: |
There's not enough time or patience in me to go through all this content. I need more filters.
It could be more clear. I click on movies and it brings up entire DVDs and I don't know if they are the newest ones or oldest ones. There's so much content it's like they can't contain it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've heard about this site for years. It lives up to what I've heard. I've already seen a couple scenes I wish hadn't seen. I've seen a few that made me wonder if a straight female that finds a transsexual woman attractive is still straight? I really believe the male/male/female bisexual niche is vastly underrated. They don't have a lot here, but I don't have any of these so I will definitely be adding those to my collection of bisexual scenes.
Some of these scenes have 4K. One of my current favorite stars is Karma Rx and she has an entire DVD on here that has her First Interracial DP, First Double Anal and first scene ever with a transsexual. Those alone are worth the price of the site as cheap as it is on holidays.
The biggest complaint I have is I know I'm not going to find 1/4 of what I'm looking for. It feels like they could have more filters. I know that they are at least related to Adult Time and that's what the navigation here reminds me of. It's not terribly, but you do feel like they could add some more options to it.
They have over 4,000 female models and nearly 1,000 transsexual models. I didn't realize there's a studio besides transsexual studios that shot this much transsexual porn.
Most of the videos have up to 1080p and some do have 4K, but I see no way to filter that to give an exact number. That part is frustrating enough to take 5 points off.
The content is mostly very hardcore, there's a lot of anal, a lot of dual penetration of multiple holes, including double penetration in one hole. They have small picture galleries with the scenes that you can download, most of the photos look like pre-scene photos.
I'm rating it very high because I haven't seen a site that appeals to this big of a crowd except for maybe Kink's network. They have every niche you could ask for, but they don't have a category search to let you separate them easily. Some of these transsexual scenes are very different. You will see a transsexual up a man's butt while the man, supposed to be straight is sucking the dick of another transsexual. It's absolute mayhem!
I will probably wait for the next round of holiday sales and maybe get a year to this one as I don't feel my month membership is going to help me find what all I'm looking for. |
|
11-05-19 12:58am
Replies (1)
|
Review
83
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What looks to be genuine amateur content
There are 229 scenes with no new updates in sight
Only one downloadable video option, but it is 720p WMV
Mixture of niches and the performance quality is just as varied
There are some hidden gems in these videos including a few group scenes. |
| Cons: |
No streaming ability. I like to scan through a scene to see if it’s worth downloading, but even though they have the option to stream nothing happens when you hit play.
The poor performances in some of the scenes.
Every scene varies including location, camerawork, attractiveness of models and there are more bad ones than good ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have seen the ex-GF network and thought maybe this was related to it, but I’m pretty sure it’s not. These videos are of young European guys and girls. I don’t know how much I believe the ex-GF part. The scenes I have downloaded and watched seem more like a desperate female trying to break into the porn industry by having someone film her having sex. Maybe the part that signals “amateurs” more than anything else are the guys in the scenes. There are guys in these scenes that look like they were picked up on the side of a road and cast into their first ever video. It is hard to tell how old these scenes are too. There is a group of guys that are in a couple of the scenes that have mullets, are wearing wife beater tank tops and look like they were just released from a low-security jail for shoplifting. It’s at least authentic.
That goes into the performances. The guys in these scenes give it their all. The girls go from at least interested and trying to look like they would rather be sleeping. The scene count is misleading as well. At least half of the scenes do not have videos with them. It seems to be either photos or video for each one. I haven’t found one scene yet that has both video and photos. There is a lot broken within the site too. The scenes with just pictures don't even have a picture of the girl in the scene. It’s a broken image with the x in the corner.
I do think there’s some redeeming qualities. Some of the videos are pretty good. The 720p video isn’t bad either. I think the biggest positive is this seems very authentic. It’s a nice change from the other sites on this network where I feel like nearly everything is formulaic and repetitive. There are some public and outdoor scenes too. I think this site makes me realize how frustrating the network is. Seeing the same positions in the same style room for nearly the same exact amount of minutes is not good when it comes to porn. This site is receiving a higher score than it probably deserves, but some might look over this site if they join this network. Maybe a decent score will make others look at it to get a break from the monotone style of most of the sites on this network. |
|
09-28-20 09:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, petite models, most look barely legal.
310 current scenes.
Downloads for videos and photo zips are available. Each scene has both.
One new scene per week.
Biller is Epoch.
Videos average 30 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
Is close to cookie cutter gonzo porn. The only unique feature is the size and cuteness of the models.
Not enough threesomes or more. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has some of the cutest, youngest looking models available. The clothing choices also makes them look and seem younger with skirt rompers, some pigtails and this is all accentuated by most of the males being tall and with large penises.
The scenes could have more story to them, but it seems like the whole site is just based on these small models trying to take on a bigger guy. The site has been around long enough to have 310 scenes. The videos are excellent quality and can be downloaded or streamed. The downloads top out at 1080p. The videos are crisp and clear, but they are large files on the 1080p ones. If you’re strapped for hard drive space you could always download the 720p, 576p or 480p versions. The 1080p ones can be as large as 3-4GB.
The models are the main attraction. Most of them are pros, but they are newer to the business or were newer when they filmed their scenes here. A good example of how they use the male model to make the female look smaller is a scene with Michael Swayze with Amber Summers. Michael Swayze is listed as 6’5”, Amber Summers is 5’1”. I just wish they would add a little more to it than the obvious size difference. A few scenes are more creative including one with the tiny woman hiding on top of a refrigerator, tucked under cabinets.
There is good diversity in the models, but we are talking about diversity in an age group/generation where mixed race is nearly the majority. A few scenes are called interracial, but the male and female both look white to me.
It’s a very good site if you like seeing smaller women having sex. And don’t mind the outfits they show up in being cliché like Girl Scouts, cheerleaders and plaid skirts with argyle socks. |
|
01-27-20 08:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
85
|
Family Screw
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I scored high when it was just starting out and it has grown nearly 3 times as much.
Multiple niches: It has the stepfamily, older/younger, group, that is one reason I scored it high when I first joined it 2 years ago.
All scenes have up to 4K downloads and there are now 63 scenes.
The site is very easy to navigate.
Some of the female models are very pretty. I don’t think that is an important part of this site.
American culture gets a pro. In India, having sex with a stepsibling is not considered taboo. I have been here long enough to accept it as taboo. |
| Cons: |
There will be people that say some of these women are not attractive. I agree with that. I think that is what they are going for. I will explain.
The scenes are not long enough. You won’t convince me a scene with 6 people in it is over in 22 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found this site when I was looking for older/younger porn a few years ago. It was very new with only around 20 scenes, but I really liked it. I do approach these older/younger scenes with the mindset that the whole point of that genre is one of the people, usually the older one, isn’t supposed to be attractive. Their sexual experience and ability make them attractive to these younger, inexperienced people. That is how I look at it. If you think that’s crazy, one of the scenes on here is “stepgrandmother gets her boys a stripper”.
A scene I would recommend anyone to see what I am talking about is “Fucking stepgrandmother”. The woman is not attractive. For her age, she is not bad, and she has large breasts. The stegrandsons look 18-21 and they are all skinny, college boys and she has sex with all of them. That is one of those the time seems too short. That could add realism that the boys couldn’t last.
I forgot to mention in the pros, the site updates around 2 times per month. I could see some months having 3 based on the update schedule.
The part I really like is the scenes that have young men and old men with the same women. You can see the natural competitiveness from the older men. They are trying to keep up with the younger man. It makes it sexy.
There are 63 scenes, all 63 are worth downloading, if you are into this niche and genre. I believe the older/younger mix and making a lot of groups, goes beyond the stepbrother with stepsister that we usually see. This is another cultural one. In Indian culture, we do not use just uncle, aunt, our words are different based on which side of the family the uncle or aunt is on. It leaves me a lot of room for using imagination and fantasies. That is a big part of my enjoyment of porn. I’m not going to score it much higher than I did before. It still is the same site with the same potential. They will have to eventually find new, creative ways to stop this site from becoming stale. All the videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. Everything is in place for the site to be very good. The only problem I really see is they have several of these older/younger sites and several stepfamily sites. I don’t understand the planning there. I would combine them and have a few updates per week. I still do like the site a lot. It could be a female perspective of being more mental than physical. The scenes are generally fun, too. |
|
01-12-22 08:52am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
86
|
Family Screw
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Reply
No, I'm not for sure why you would think you know what I liked. I said there were a few scenes that pushed bad taste. I also really got tired of seeing Gunther. If I had to put a number on it, I would say I really liked 4 and liked maybe 10-12 others.
|
04-30-20 10:49am
|
Reply
87
|
Family Screw
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Reply
There's a streaming network included. I described the disgusting part in the reply to RearAdmiral, I didn't see your reply until after I replied to his.
I thought my description would give it away. She looks like Marilyn Manson 20 years from now and after a sex change.
|
04-30-20 08:17am
|
Reply
88
|
Family Screw
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The most disgusting part was the woman. She looks 60's or 70's, really might not be, but they have her lipstick around her lips instead of on her lips, a huge nickel sized mole on her cheek, a black eye and I assume they were going for old prostitute. She looks like a meth addict (I see them everyday), maybe weighs 100 pounds with loose, fat hanging off her body and her butt is sunk-in. To make that worse, she has on lingerie with a thong.
The old man Gunther is giving her to his "son" who looks 20. The son very believably looks disgusted and even flips the camera off. The bad taste, at least for me, Gunther is also in gay and bisexual scenes and he's licking his "son's" cum off her butt. I like a lot of the stepfamily porn, but a dad licking his son's cum off a disgusting woman's butt was a little more than I want to see.
They must be reusing scenes. They are now downloadable and the oldest says it was released in 2019. The four newest listed scenes are really good. They all are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p and can be streamed too.
|
04-30-20 08:15am
|
Review
89
|
Family Screw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Small, but kinky and perverse threesomes to group sex.
With such a small collection you can at least say you liked every scene.
All 24 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p
Some of these scenes reach new highs or lows in how believable and perverse they are.
I received a promo for it after being a member of Granddadz and Grandparents X. This is similar to those sites and really would like to see them combine them all into one network.
Updating twice per month. |
| Cons: |
I’ve seen some young male porn stars that seem overworked, but there’s a guy on here that I see in scenes all across this company’s sites named Gunther. He looks 60s, maybe 70s. I only list this as a con because he has trouble keeping it up.
I take this type of porn with the belief it’s in humor. At least one scene on this site is nearing disgusting.
There are some scenes that I don’t know who is supposed to be related or married or what they’re even doing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This disgusting scene features Gunther, see con #1 and a much younger male with a much older woman who I would describe as Marilyn Manson, 20 years from now, after a sex change. The subject of the scene even recognizes it, “Nasty present for youngest son”. A lot of these scenes are good. A few of them push the bad taste envelope.
I thought the best scene on the site was the best of any of their older/younger sites, it’s titled, “Luxury Wellness Receptionist” and has a very attractive man with a very pretty woman while Gunther joins in. He’s like a little Leprechaun.
I have had one common problem with their older/younger scenes and that is how short the scenes are. They have one scene here that has 9 people in it and it lasts barely 20 minutes.
The good thing with these sites is the high quality videos. 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The navigation doesn’t have to be that good. Every scene is on one page. I don’t recognize any of the models except Gunther. The main theme here starts with some sort of family connection. One is a family that is going to swinger’s club. I don’t know that I like admitting it, but the attraction for me is in the perverse nature of this niche. And they have such a broad range in looks between the models that it’s hard to imagine it being any less perverse, even without relation.
I’ll give it a decent score for the high quality everything and continuing to make scenes that seem near impossible to talk the younger people into. If they would combine this site with Grandparents X, Granddadz, Grandmams, I think it would be a major hit and at the top the older/younger genre.
Maybe it’s just my mind working in a bad way, but what happens – you know, when Gunther and the older stars kick the bucket? Of course, they can replace them, but he’s in so many of these scenes. The changes I would like to see made is either creating a network out of all their older/younger sites or speeding up the updates. I think if they combined the sites into a network you would be looking at a md-90s score. As it is, with a slow update schedule and a few really good scenes they have a chance to have a good to great site as the new updates come in, but it’s still going to take 3-4 years for them to just reach 100 total scenes.
It’s worth trying if you have tried and liked their other older/young scenes, especially if you get one of the cheaper promos, otherwise, I would wait a while and see what direction they take these sites into. |
|
04-29-20 03:13am
Replies (7)
|
Review
90
|
Fetish Network
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very big network dedicated to fetishes - 52 different sites.
The site works well. Probably better if you know what niche/fetish you are looking for.
Some mainstream fetishes like feet, hose and BDSM. Some fetishes that I believe are rare these days, including 3 sites with models that are smoking cigarettes, some bondage that makes Kink look tame and some like Brutal Castings, that are hard to even watch.
They do feature series videos that are interesting, both in story and how the scenes play out. There's not enough of those.
Quite possibly the corniest fetish -- hypnotized models. Those are entertaining to watch. |
| Cons: |
I know this shouldn't be a con since it is a fetish network, but some of the content is extremely hardcore, maybe the most hardcore I've seen.
Navigation isn't very good, there's no model list, but you can click a model's name in a scene and see all of her scenes.
Can't tell if it's updating and number count looks lower than the last TBP review. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the definition of a hit or miss network. About 20 of the sites are interesting to me, with 10 getting most of my attention. The other 20 are ones I'm not interested in at all.
I am into foot fetish and hose. They have over 500 scenes pertaining to foot fetish and/or hose. That's my money worth.
These series which they list as sites have some very good, interesting scenes with stories: Waitress POV, Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Hostel XXX, Operation Escort, Internet Creeper, and Strap-On Squad. They just don't have enough of those. Five of those sites have 20 or less scenes on them. Three have 10 or less.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The older scenes are not as consistent. Some don't list what the download's resolution is and there is only one option to download "high".
The quality is overall very good.
I think the site Pantyhose Creep is maybe the most interesting one for me, but it only has 44 scenes on it.
I counted around 3,500 scenes, it's not exactly easy to count these as they list all 52 sites one page with a number out from it. I'm not going to sit here and punch 52 numbers into a calculator. I went over the numbers in my head and came up about 600 short of the last TBP review. It's possible I'm missing something or not counting something, but that shows the problem with the navigation as well.
It's a good, somewhat confusing network if you are into fetishes. I think those that like foot/hose would be as pleased with the network as I am. If you're into the really rough sex you would probably like some of the sites on here. Those into bondage, they have 10 different sites with bondage as the main theme.
I don't think it's updating. I accidentally forgot to cancel it and am on the second month of my membership. I haven't noticed any new scenes and there's not a tab for "updates". They have a good and different network here, but they do need to put a little work into making it more functional and easier to find what you're looking for. |
|
10-07-19 11:10pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
91
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One really great site (Mano Job) and two okay sites.
The network’s navigation is not conducive for counting models. It’s also not easy to count all the scenes. I am getting these numbers: Mano Job has 771 scenes, The Dick Suckers has 192 scenes and Mr. POV has 275 scenes.
The model list works well, where each model is listed with all of her scenes across the 3 sites. It just doesn’t have a way to view all the scenes together across the 3 sites. You have to filter down to the specific site or specific model.
This will be mentioned in the cons too. Most of the scenes I have watched or downloaded have 1080p and there is a filter for 1080p, but as other reviewers have noted there is recycling and when you use the 1080p filter, it gives you results across all 3 sites. This may be the most difficult site to review.
The scenes are enjoyable if you’re into handjobs and pretty and cute models teasing a man, sometimes adding a blowjob and sometimes more. |
| Cons: |
The navigation is getting a lot of mentions. It works well as long as you are trying to find what they want you to find. The tags give you results from all 3 sites. But you can’t view all the scenes from all 3 sites without using the tags.
No dates on updates and based on numbers from previous reviews there’s not only less scenes, there are some new 4K scenes added, which means they have removed even more scenes to recycle.
Finding any kind of consistency. There’s just not any. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been recommended to me by multiple PU members. I did not list this in pros, but I was able to also sign into the site No Way Am I Gay and there are a couple of other sites listed under their company’s name that you can also sign into, Chelci Fox is one too. I am not including those in this review. The Finishes the Job site shows 3 sites and those other sites look like they haven’t been updated in at least a decade even though I do like the No Way Am I Gay site. It is solo men masturbating which is my favorite niche, the video quality is just very poor.
Mano Job is the site I was told to try. It is a handjob site and the female models are mostly attractive. I do think some of them were or are well-known. What makes this handjob stand out is it has tags. Are you picking up on what I’m saying? Most handjob sites only have handjobs and wouldn’t need tags. This site adds butt teases, pussy teases, tit fucking (how they list it), jerk off encouragement which I continue to say is as arousing to women as men. They have taken the handjob genre another step and I do like that. There are even parts where the pussy tease slips and becomes vaginal sex for just a few seconds. The number of scenes is where it’s hard to complain, but also is disappointing. The last review by KayTBuffs listed the Mano Job scenes at close to 900. There are now 771 and according to the site’s page you open to it’s being updated daily. Older reviews even listed higher numbers of scenes. They do have 4K scenes, which do look new or newer, but in this case -- that just means there are even more removed scenes. It still does have over 750 scenes with downloadable videos and photos, making it a very large hand job site. The scenes are at least more than just a handjob too.
The site Mr. POV is okay. It’s a decent sized site and if you like POV-style porn you will probably like this site. I don’t see a big appealing factor in it unless the thinking is it’s for those who get tired of the handjobs. These scenes are hardcore sex scenes.
The Dick Suckers is the smallest of the sites and it’s a lot like Mano Jobs except it’s blowjobs instead of handjobs and there’s very little tease. The models are often on all three sites, especially the popular ones I recognize by name.
This takes us to the biggest problem. It’s a network with no way to see all the scenes in one place. It’s more like a hub page that you select a specific site from. It adds a new twist by offering tags. The tags show content from all three sites. If you select the “cumshot” tag, you will get scenes from all three sites. It seems like this is one of those “networks” where less is more maybe applies. If I select the 1080p tag, it gives me all the scenes from all 3 sites that have 1080p downloads. What if I just want the 1080p scenes from Mano Job? This does make it more noticeable that they are recycling. I tried using the 1080p tag. The results delivered rows of videos from all 3 sites. I then filtered to Mano Job with the 1080p filter set. It opened the results, but the 9th video doesn’t have 1080p. It only lets you use one filter at a time and it shows the recycling. The 4K filter shows a good amount of 4K videos with a total of 169 scenes with 4K downloads -- across the 3 sites, but if you filter to any of those sites, those 4K videos do not show up as the newest updates. There are even scenes with 720p maximum download resolution showing up as newer.
I am being fair with the score on a subjective basis. I am only really interested in the Mano Job content and it was my first time trying the site. Recycling is annoying, but I don’t think it applies on your first subscription. I do believe if you have been a member before you may not be as pleased with it as I am. |
|
08-09-21 03:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
92
|
First BGG
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-threesome site featuring two girls and one guy.
The site has been around for 11 years which could be as much of a con as pro.
There are currently 127 scenes with only 1 update per month.
Site navigates well which is to be expected of a site this size.
Newer videos include 4K.
Vendo is the billing processor and they are as easy to use as any biller, maybe easier if you have multiple memberships with them they all show up. |
| Cons: |
Eleven years as a site and it only has 127 scenes. If this site fits a niche you like you will be pleased with the selection, but you won’t get much new content once you download what you want.
It just seems like this studio doesn’t believe in filming any scenes with substantial length to them. Even with a third person added the scenes average 20-30 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
You get the picture with the title of the site. There’s going to be two girls and a boy in each scene. These are not your wilder threesomes. Some of the scenes do have the guy with one of the girls while the other girl sits on the other’s face, but a lot of just looks like two different girls taking turns with the guy. The scenes do feature a lot of double blowjob action if that interests you. I’m not really for sure what they are going for here since I see the word “passionate” a lot, but the actions don’t show that. These scenes are not bad, they just aren’t great. When you see the two girls in the scenes a lot of times you are going to think it’s going to be great. The guy is mostly a clod. He just lays there and lets the two girls take turns doing their positions with him.
You only have 127 scenes here with 1 new one added per month. That has been common for them for the 11 years they have had this site, as they average just a little over 11 scenes per year. I do prefer the American sites that do this same exact niche since you get more dialogue and longer scenes. Some of the scenes feel terribly rushed. The girls are cute in looks to very pretty. The guys are a hit or miss bunch with more misses than hits. They could do better with male model selection.
The newer videos have up to 4K unlimited downloads and streaming. They also offer the standards 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p. The photos can be downloaded in zips. The con side of being an 11 year old site is the oldest videos are 720p max. Those also have 480p and 360p. I don’t mind 720p and often download that resolution, but it could be a problem for others. It seems to be a double whammy here since the site isn’t that big and the older content doesn’t even have 1080p or 4K.
However, I will say I like this site’s scenes better than the one on one sites I have seen on this network. Maybe it’s just the thought that more could happen even if it doesn’t?
I don’t think this site is enough reason to join the network, but when you combine it with the value of the other sites the network comes with it makes this site one of the better ones on the network just because it’s a little different and changes up their formulaic approach their other sites use so much. |
|
09-28-20 09:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
93
|
Fist Flush
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women seeing how far they can stick their fist up inside themselves, sometimes with help from others.
Small but very good collection of 78 videos. They have updated as recently as August 2020.
Easy to use site with excellent video quality.
These scenes seem to take on more of a realistic feel to them. Maybe it's just me thinking a woman wouldn't be into this unless she was really into the scene?
I have only been a member of one other fisting site and have to say these models are much prettier than the other fisting site I tried.
Epoch is the payment processor.
Every scene has at least 1080p and 720p videos. Some of the newer ones have 4K. |
| Cons: |
The scene count could be higher, but this niche is poorly represented. Supply and demand thinking?
These scenes would be some of my favorites if the models talked much or explained what is going through their minds when somehow shoving their fist up their pussy and their other fist up their ass. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a pleasant surprise for me. As someone that works (sometimes) in sexual therapy, I can understand the need and use of extreme masturbation. Some of the content here goes into extremes I haven't seen one woman do to herself like the scenes with a woman fisting her pussy with one hand and ass with the other. Besides being extreme stretching in a relative area, it takes a lot of flexibility to pull that off.
I would like to see more of the solo scenes in this niche. There are less than 10 of the 78 videos here with a solo model. I can see the attraction, possibly the "heat of the moment" to be fisted when with another person, but the solo ones are as graphic and explicit as any porn. These scenes add draw even more interest with the pretty models. I am not saying this to be offensive, but I thought this was a niche more for the average or below looking models. I do not believe the low video count is a problem. That is combined with how pretty the models are. You just aren't going to find a lot of videos of very pretty models fisting themselves and each other. I talked about being a member on another site featuring fisting. I did not download any videos from it as I thought the models were unattractive. I will download at least half of the videos from this site.
The video quality couldn't be much better. Their oldest scenes all have 1080p, 720p and a few other smaller options including mobile, while the newer scenes offer 4K too.
This is a niche that I don't believe can be faked. There is a lot of realism in these scenes, very clear orgasms with some squirting too. While I do prefer the solo ones for the pure kinkiness of it, some of the scenes with two models also reach that high level of kinkiness. There are scenes where one model is fisting the other and starts giving her oral too while fingering her ass. I am thinking, "What more could she even do to her?" There are even cute moments when one model has a hard orgasm and you can see her laugh or smile like it embarrassed her. This was an overlooked site for me. It hits a happy medium between too kinky and not kinky enough. I thoroughly enjoyed it. |
|
09-08-20 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
94
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A big foot fetish site with an emphasis on regular foot fetish -- meaning the male and sometimes or female enjoy kissing, touching and licking her feet.
They have 618 scenes, each scene has a photo set and video. They add 1 new scene per week.
Includes access to Adult Time, it changes the original navigation and feel of the site, but works without any major differences or problems.
Someone at the site has a good, working knowledge of foot fetishism. There aren't a lot of male talents used on this site, but the ones that are seem to be real foot fetishists.
High production values for a fetish site. |
| Cons: |
General lack of reverse foot fetish content -- meaning the woman whose feet and legs are being licked, kissed and caressed is only aroused by being the one having it done to her. The women in the scenes seem to be as much into their feet as the men are.
Even as a reverse foot fetishist, I recognize the redundancy of a niche like this one.
I would be happier with it if they focused more on the legs and feet with clothing choices (hose, stockings and leggings) instead of having most of the newer scenes focusing on the bare feet and legs. |
| Bottom Line: |
Foot fetishists are viewed as strange. People generally believe a foot fetishist is someone that walks around with toes on their breath. A foot fetishist doesn't even have to include the feet. It can be the gait of a woman's walk that starts the attraction to her legs and on down, instead of on up.
The newer scenes are disappointing to me. They are shot from an already ready view. The woman is usually already out of her hose or stockings or leggings. A body part fetish -- in my opinion -- should focus on that body part and include what would be called "worship".
The worship here is relegated to kissing, licking, sucking on feet, legs and toes. Did they run out of fishnet stockings? Tight leggings that seduce the man from her ankles up to her knees and back down? It might sound like these are not legitimate negatives, but in a fetish of a body part, that body part should be the most wanted by the person fulfilling the fetish.
They do seem to put a lot of work, time and even money into the scenes, but they have also fallen into the "if ain't broke" mantra. I am sure there are foot fetishist that are happy with that. It just does not appeal as much to a reverse foot fetishist.
The producers of this site -- 21 Sextury -- also have the site 21 Foot Art. It has more content for reverse foot fetishists. This site is a good site for foot lovers. I have heard a lot of male foot fetishists love to see the woman alternate sucking on her own toes and the guy's penis. They feature that "position" in a lot of their scenes. I am surprised they don't have a category for it.
Four of the male actors are prominently featured on foot fetish sites -- Charlie Dean, Toby, Kristof Cale and Vince Carter. This is one niche that requires the male to do more than get it up, stick it in, last 20 minutes and give a good ejaculation. They have to be able to focus on the feet, legs and toes while doing all those other parts.
The female models are mostly very pretty, European and do at least enjoy having their feet kissed and licked. As someone that discovered their own interest in this niche, I sometimes wonder about he female model's enjoyment and real interest in the fetish. I am saying this is one time I would like to see the female models talk about which parts (toe licking/sucking, sole licking, entire leg licking) turns them on most, but their inability to speak English limits that interaction.
Minor improvements are needed, but most of those are subjective. It would rate a little higher if they relied more on clothes than shoes/strap sandals. It's a very good deal within an Adult Time membership. |
|
07-27-19 10:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
95
|
Frank's TGirl World
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Transsexual site, owned or managed by Grooby that is perfect for all genders including straight women.
The models vary a lot, but I mostly see Asians on the site. Asians are my preference in transsexuals.
Four to five updates per week, each includes video and photos.
A lot of very pretty transsexuals or T-Girls if you insist.
I was able to join through Epoch using Paypal.
Would the pun be too much to say loads of solo scenes? |
| Cons: |
They have some sex scenes with men. I keep waiting on the transsexual site that stays away from hardcore sex.
I don’t know how they would do it, but I would like to see the scenes be a little longer. Nearly all are under 20 minutes, and some are under 15 minutes. There was only one transsexual model I ever watched that was really good at showing her body. Some of these transsexuals could. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are a lot of different classifications for transsexuals. We have the transsexual, the she-male, the T-Girl, the Ladyboys and that’s why straight males have problems getting into this type of porn. They know that at least one of those classifications is more feminine. I don’t even know which one. I usually prefer Ladyboys. I do like a lot of T-Girls and even transsexuals. The She-Males in my experience are the more masculine types. You’re not going to see many masculine models on Frank’s T-Girl World. These are mostly very feminine, pretty t-girls, transsexuals and I have to think a lot of these models are going into transgender where they were born with feminine genetics, but called a male.
There is not a lot of story or plot to these scenes. The variety of models is impressive. The site irself say that Frank has been filming and photographing t-girls since 2002. From the United States to Brazil to the Philippines. You can tell, as with Grooby sites, that the producer and one in charge really enjoys filming transsexuals. That’s a big deal in this genre. I think it will become an even more important part of transsexual porn. It is becoming more mainstream. Some of the biggest networks in the world are now featuring transsexual scenes. Which means a change of pace for their producers that are used to filming the more “mainstream” porn genres. That’s a major advantage for this site.
I don’t know how much model and producer chemistry really matters, but I do believe if there was a problem between model and producer the scene wouldn’t be as good. These very feminine models do look like and act like they expect to be treated like ladies. Wallets are a lot easier to open than minds. Frank at Frank’s T-Girl World is very open to the transsexuals and t-girls. You get really good pictures and genuine smiles from the models. Some transsexual solo scenes are very flat to watch. The only excitement or tension you see in those is the model trying her best to cum and get the scene over with. Frank’s scenes have some teasing and it’s like the models are teasing Frank. I didn’t know the importance of model and producer chemistry until a few members here pointed me in the direction of ALS Scan and a few other sites that excel at on-screen chemistry between the model and producer. I do see that at Frank’s T-Girl World.
Adding that in with nearly 2,000 models, over 3,500 videos and over 700,000 photos, there’s a really good chance you will find some content you like. Even if the T-girl is taboo to you. I do believe sites like this one are the most important part of growing the transsexual genre. They tried to jump transsexual porn to mainstream and put it in the hands of producers that have not ever filmed transsexuals. A site like this one needs more attention despite the high price. It’s around $38 per month.
You shouldn’t have any concerns either. The support at Frank’s T-Girl World is run by Grooby and you can join using Epoch through Paypal. That is a potential problem with other transsexual sites that use billers no one has heard of. I go against all thinking when I say this next part. I like that a lot of these models are average or below endowment. It adds something to the attraction to the model. She’s not able to rely on the snake between her legs. There are still models with large endowment, but it’s not a requirement. The majority of the scenes are solo and that’s what I prefer with transsexuals. I never thought someone masturbating their dick could be sexy and seductive. Some of these transsexuals are sexy and seductive. In comparison, the transsexuals on Brazilian Transsexuals are more extravagant and in your face sexy. The T-Girls are more seductive about it. Even mysterious. One of the newest updates shows the chemistry. It’s of a model named Tan. She had a scene back in 2016, 6 years ago and you have to think she had a good experience, or she wouldn’t be filming with them again. My current favorite site of 2022. |
|
04-11-22 07:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
FTM Men
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I’m using FTM as the Bareback Plus hub for this review. Bareback Plus isn’t listed.
Six sites that include two relatively rare FTM transgender sites. It also has four gay sites with it.
Downloads cost extra but are worth it if you’re into the niches. Those can be downloaded up to 1080p.
Includes Jason Sparks Live which is one of the best amateur gay sites going.
Almost always has a $19.95 promo when you visit the site.
I don’t know if getting to see an obscure niche in porn and even in daily life is a pro, but you get that on this network. |
| Cons: |
It took the world of porn around 40 years to accept and like transsexual porn. Transgender is the next step and I’m thinking FTM will have the most difficulty unless from female users. I will try and explain it below.
Needs better pictures and zip downloads. The FTM niche would be a lot better with pictures. I know that videos are just pictures in action, but action kind of messes this niche up. Too much movement. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTM porn is Female to Male transition. The transsexual porn we are used to is Male to Female transition. FTM offers females the same shock and maybe giggles that transsexual porn offers males. In FTM we see a handsome faced male, sometimes has a beard, muscular chest, hairy chest, and masculine features all the way down the model’s torso. And then, there’s a pussy. How did that get there? I know from males that they had the same reaction the first time they saw a MTF transsexual. Pretty and feminine face, boobs, feminine torso, then a dick. How did that get there?
That is what FTM is. You can look at the previews of this site FTM or the other FTM site included Jock Pussy. Both of those will make understanding what I’m talking about a lot easier to understand. I have seen FTM models on standard transsexual sites. I haven’t seen full sites dedicated to the FTM models until this one and Jock Pussy. If you’re not confused, the “network” itself may confuse you. It comes with Jock Pussy, FTM, Jason Sparks Live, Bound Twinks, Twink Loads and Raw Fuck Boys.
It's a very rare niche in porn. I have seen it listed as unappreciated. You may not realize it, but what FTM porn equals is a dick having sex with a pussy. It’s gender bending. It looks like two men having sex. But one of those men is a biological woman. That’s why I don’t really see the addition of these two sites on an otherwise gay network. I consider it very interesting to watch. The FTM models can look as masculine as any man you have ever seen, but you can usually tell by their mannerisms and body language that their nature is of a female. If you think seeing a beautiful, slender transsexual is attractive, you may at least like to see these FTM models that are handsome and built like an athletic man with a pussy.
The two sites combined have nearly 150 scenes between them. The scenes are not much different. You do get some threesomes. Which can be really confusing but can also be very good. Often times, one of the models with a dick has to stand to the side and masturbate. The pictures are one of the big drawbacks of the site. This seems to be a niche made for pictures. The resolution is not very good and no zip downloads. You do have to pay extra for video downloads. I think the two FTM sites are worth it one time. It’s just so different than anything you’re going to see on other sites. Different doesn’t always mean good. Check the previews before joining.
I know this is an odd way to show a niche that this site and Jock Pussy cover well, but it is something I noticed in the scenes. If you like seeing a hairy pussy receiving oral, this site probably does that better than any. The models have the hairy hormones. Some of these FTM models are hairier than any male models I have seen. It almost feels more like I have joined a site for the educational reasons. The bonus, if you’re into gay sites is the partial network of 4 gay sites.
I don’t know who this type of porn is aimed at. I would recommend it to everyone just to see the looks of shock. Instead, I will say check out the previews. The quality of videos is very good with up to 1080p downloads. The site works well. I like it, but without any way to know if it’s updates or being able to see a pattern of updates, I don’t know if it has much long-term value. |
|
06-07-22 03:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
97
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Sorry about review-blocking (is that like cock-blocking?) you! I joined the FTV sites on a 3 month combo promo and am running out of time on them.
I still am having problems with the video downloads. I think it's because of the filenames.
I believe we talked once before about tattooed models always end up in these brutal hardcore scenes and I see Milfs in a similar way. Every site that has Milfs it's either having sex with her daughter's boyfriend or these outlandish storylines that are kind of degrading. That is one part I really liked about FTV Milfs, even the older women on it. It shows them being just as horny and taking care of themselves just like we usually see teens and 20s models doing. I do like the FTV Girls site better, but it has weighed me down on the review since I was brand new to it and there's so much content on it.
I would be interested in a FTVX site. I like the way they film and produce their scenes. I don't know if adding a male would make it harder to be as flexible with their scenes or not, but I would check it out. I am planning on renewing the 3 months to just FTV Girls once this combo membership runs out.
|
04-14-21 07:08am
|
Review
98
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A different take on the Milf niche than I am used to and I like it.
Nearly 350 models with some being completely new amateurs and some being established porn stars.
Impressive variety of models (age, body types, what they are willing to do)
Each model has at least one video series that totals 80-120 minutes and 200-500 photos. They add a new model or returning model once per week.
Site navigation is confusing at first, but gets easier to use and understand. The navigation then becomes a pro for the site.
Uses reputable billers, it gave me the choice of CCBill or Epoch. I prefer Epoch and chose it.
Very professional feeling with just enough amateur touch and the added variety to keep it from being samey from model to model. |
| Cons: |
Downloading the videos was a big problem for me during my first week of membership, but I then figured it out. This site and their other site FTV Girls handles downloading videos differently than any site I have been a member of.
The porn star scenes are not as enjoyable to me.
If you plan to download the 4K versions of the newer videos you better have a very fast download speed.
Filenames could be better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been interested in joining this site and their other site FTV Girls for awhile now, but I keep forgetting about them. The scenes are to me similar to if you met a model, talked to her, helped her find and explore her fetishes while videoing her and taking very pretty pictures of her. There’s a personal side to each scene you don’t get on most porn sites.
My thoughts on the different models can be explained without too much trouble. They do defy the laws of what is a MILF. Some of these models are in their 20s. I know it has been a discussion here before. While MILF could be even an 18 year old -- in porn, MILF content does seem to be more in the 30 to 50 year old models. There is also the possibility of some of the models looking a lot younger than they are. You will see that with several on this site.
The scenes like to bring in some forms of exhibitionism in the beginning. I have read that it has been tamed down over the years, but to me any form of exhibitionism is a big deal. If it’s a flash, if it’s masturbation, and it’s in public that is a big deal. Like most women and some guys, I enjoy exhibitionism. There are sections in the videos where the cameraman talks to the model and it’s not the same redundant questions you usually get in porn.
The videos, I noticed a complaint posted on the FTV Girls videos recently, but I don’t know the technical terms. I think the videos look great, they have pretty scenery when outdoors and the indoor parts are clear with plenty of close-ups. I kind of was expecting more softcore. I was correlating softcore with exhibitionism, but these scenes all have masturbation that is as graphic and even extreme as I have seen. There’s nothing disgusting or ripping the woman open with a massive dildo, but I am seeing more real orgasms on this site than on most sites. The pictures are similar to the videos in terms of pretty scenery, colors and vibrance.
You can download the videos and photo sets. The problem I had with downloading the videos in case anyone else runs into this. When you click on a scene it opens the video and there is the download link for the video. I was not realizing each video has multiple parts. I was just downloading the 1st video. Which also led to me thinking this is a very softcore site. I could see how that would bother some people. The file names could be better to work with having to download multiple videos to piece together a full scene. I did read over the more experienced reviews of this site and FTV Girls and now can see what has been said. There is clearly a separation in the scenes into parts so you can just download the parts of the video you want to see. If you don’t like the interviewing/talking part, you can skip downloading that. If you don’t like masturbation, you can skip it. If you don’t like exhibitionism you can skip that part. The reason I can see this being useful is from my cons. The 4K videos from this site are very large. The most current update has 14 parts to the video. If you downloaded all 14 parts in 4K the scene would be around 15GB total. That’s just too much for me for one full video and being able to choose which parts you want to download gives you the chance to pare that size down.
One of the parts I am most impressed with is the model variety. These look like almost all American models and they come in different sizes (most are average or slimmer), some with large boobs, others with smaller boobs, blondes, brunettes, redheads, black women, Indian woman, Latinas and the ages look to go from 25 to around 50.
They are updating once a week and the update is bigger than a usual update since it includes 80-120 minutes of video and 250-500 photos of the model being featured that week. There are a few lesbian scenes and a few male with female scenes, but I didn’t even watch those since I take this site -- as said, as a personal experience of getting to know the one model.
I am very impressed overall and will be a returning customer to this site and FTV Girls too. |
|
04-11-21 10:55pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
99
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The never gets old tutor teaches the student a few new things, niche.
Some of the scenes do a good job of depicting an older, dominant tutor with the submissive student.
There are 234 scenes with 1 new one added each month.
The female models are cute/pretty, the males are just okay.
Something I usually don’t notice, but this site has very good camerawork.
Photo sets are downloadable and videos are as well with no limitations. |
| Cons: |
When I said the guys are just okay, it’s mostly because they are using either gray hair color or wigs to make the guys look older.
No subtitles and no way for me to know what they’re saying. I guess they’re not studying English. |
| Bottom Line: |
This niche is almost always a popular one for me. I prefer the older man with younger woman scenes and this niche is made for that setup. Except when you see a male who looks like a 24 year old athlete with solid gray hair. Maybe it’s an older man that just looks a lot younger than he is. I do think they missed a good opportunity with this site. The scenes that involve any lesbian parts are threesomes with 2 female students and a male tutor. It seems like someone would have thought about making a female the tutor with a younger female student.
The site is good sized for this niche. The 234 scenes come with download options from 540p to 4K. The newer scenes only have the 4K option. The downloads are unlimited and also include a downloadable photo set.
The obvious problem is there is very little English. The problem I noticed more once watching the scenes is there are scenes where the tutor is already at the girl’s house and she’s in her underwear to start the scene. One of the threesome ones, the tutor is sitting between the two girls when the scene starts and both girls are touching him. Maybe they have been having sex for months, and that’s where the dialogue is missed. Tutors don’t just pop up on living room couches with boners.
I do like some of the scenes, but also find myself streaming them before downloading. This niche for me has a lot of potential, but the parts I listed above are how you lower the potential. They’re not even studying in most of the scenes. They are watching television. I would expect more spanking, more shows of dominance and submissiveness. And if the girl is going to make the first move how about a little seduction? In the couch threesome the one girl just slaps her hand on the guy’s dick. I still believe the site is okay. Most of the girls are cute. The guys are really just okay. They have a few scenes that have what looks like a real older man not one they have made look older. Those are the best scenes for me.
I would like to see sites like this one worry more about the production values than making 4K videos. It just seems like there is a lot of wasted potential. I would even prefer having English subtitles instead of 4K. If you have the time to go through and find scenes you know you will like it’s an okay join. |
|
09-28-20 10:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
Gender X
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Difficult to call this a transsexual site as the scenes vary (per partner), but each scene does have at least one transsexual in it.
Impressive 248 scenes with new updates 4-5 days per week.
Scenes come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
The site is quite easy to use with a clear “videos” tab, a clear “movies” tab that groups the scenes into a theme, a “stars” tab that lists all the models and a “photos” tab.
I usually am more attracted to the ladyboy-style of transsexuals (smaller frame, usually Asian), but the transsexuals on this site are very attractive even though not really ladyboys.
Professional site design, easy to join and cancel. |
| Cons: |
It does look like this site is a blend of the transsexual scenes taken from all of the Gamma-owned sites. Some are from Evil Angel, some are from Adult Time’s Transfixed, and I am sure that’s why the scene number is high for a relatively newer site and the update frequency is very high for a transsexual site. There is a positive to this which I will go into.
I would like more scenes with transsexuals with females. This is always a con for me on transsexual sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
GenderX is what I am going to say is a compilation site of the transsexual scenes Gamma records. This is a positive in some ways. You can get the new transsexual scenes from Adult Time, Devil’s Films and Evil Angel -- as example, all on this site, without having to join Adult Time/Devil’s Films and Evil Angel. It also does seem to focus on the best scenes from their sites. It has the Adult Time produced series Transfixed on it as well as Trans Fluid. I don’t know what the regular price is. I joined it through an offer on Adult Time and it was only $9.95 with downloads. That’s a good price for this high quality content that can be downloaded.
The updates come fast with 14 in July. Quality is always an issue with transsexual sites. Not here. All 248 scenes have these download options: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. I don’t think I have been a member of a transsexual site with nearly 250 scenes all with 1080p and 4K download options. The picture sets are a little underwhelming in resolution at 1920x1280, but these are legitimate photo sets with as many as 500 photos in each. The first 100 or more of the photos are of the transsexual model, posing and showing her body off in clothes or lingerie. I have noticed some of the photo sets only have 50-75 photos in each.
The sex is going to need mutliple explanations. There are gangbangs with 3-4 males with 2-3 transsexuals. There are scenes with transsexuals with men one on one. And there are scenes with transsexuals with women. These are of special interest. It’s very rare -- in my experience, to see “known” female pornstars with transsexuals. One of the newest scenes is of one of the few pornstars I recognize by name, Kenzie Reeves with a transsexual. That does add some interest for me. It looks like transsexual porn is becoming more mainstream and accepted.
There is a disappointment I don’t think is fair to list as a con. There is only 1 solo scene. Which is my favorite niche in transsexual porn. These are instead full-on hardcore sex scenes with transsexuals involved. The site has a lot of appeal for those curious about transsexuals. Most transsexual sites have one theme and stick to it: Male with transsexual, female with transsexual, and group scenes just aren’t that common in the transsexual genre. This site gives you all three.
It is all done on a professional site that is easy to use and has a relatively large selection of scenes. The site does have categories and you can use that filter down to your interest. I didn’t mention the categories as a pro or con. They are not correct. There are 248 scenes, but according to the categories there are only 8 “female fucks trans” and you will see the error they have made, there are 28 scenes of “trans fucks female”. They also only list 14 “trans fucks trans” and 45 “male fucks trans”. That’s less than 100 scenes. Who are they fucking in the other 150+ scenes?
It’s easy enough to just scroll through the scenes without using the categories. I will keep the score a little lower than it probably deserves. I did not realize this site uses scenes from other Gamma sites and the botched categories need to be fixed. It’s still worth joining if you’re curious about the different forms of transsexual porn. |
|
08-09-21 03:30pm
Replies (0)
|
|
