| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
Pansexual X
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site that can have a blend of porn genres in each scene.
Updated regularly, but there is no set schedule.
Mostly attractive men, women and transsexuals.
There are only 39 scenes currently, but all 39 have up to 4K downloads on videos.
Seems like a genre or niche with unlimited potential, but that creates cons, too.
Had a billing problem, but the chat was friendly and fixed it. |
| Cons: |
This plays off the pro about the potential. It feels like they are going to need a lot of time to really figure out the direction to take this site.
Too many non-porn scenes considering there are only 39 scenes. There are interviews and behind the scenes videos mixed in.
It goes without saying, so I will say it, there will be a lot of people turned away from this genre. |
| Bottom Line: |
PansexualX is a site that tries to mix standard straight sex with bisexual sex and adds transsexuals plus transgender models. This sounds really good in thought. The first and clearest problem to me is there are scenes with 2 models. I understand that when it’s a straight site. I don’t understand it when you are promoted as a site that covers straight, bi and transsexual. I want to say three models in each scene should be the minimum. There is even a solo scene. That shows the part about it feels like they don’t know which direction to take the site. Of the 39 scenes, there is one sex scene with more than 2 people. One. Each scene has a behind the scenes, interview and sex video. I could be mistaken on this, but the last time I was a member there were scenes from their other transsexual sites on this one. Those have been removed and replaced with the new scenes.
I was going to review it the last time I was a member but noticed how many scenes were from their other sites. That has changed now, but I even get the feeling the site is losing momentum. The update schedule started out as nearly weekly. It then switched to twice per month (3 scenes in each) and now it’s once per month. The site only started in June 2021.
The one big positive is the video quality. There are 8 download resolutions starting at 160p and ending at 4K.
My feeling about what I see on this site: A transsexual and bisexual site. It’s not even as good of a transsexual sites as their other transsexual sites and the bisexual parts are not that good. The sex scenes are longer (in the 30 minutes range), but the feeling of not knowing what direction to go in is even in the scenes. One scene stands out and is possibly the only scene I will keep from the site. It has Adriana Chechik and Aspen Brooks (transsexual) in it. Even the interview video for it is very good. Most of the rest of the scenes – despite big name stars (I wouldn’t know the names if they weren’t stars), have a generic feel to them. The interviews seem to be there to replace any functioning story in the scenes. Maybe they can salvage this site and reach the potential, but the pairings show it’s not going much beyond transsexual sites. Only one one-fourth of the scenes have a female in them. It’s more leaning towards transsexuals with men and transsexuals with transsexuals which is what a transsexual site usually is. As someone that collects transsexual with women, I was expecting to see that in every scene, but I was also expecting to see more than 2 people in the majority of the scenes. I don’t see it pushing any boundaries at this point. It’s a transsexual site. I do know the term “pansexual” is used loosely in current times, but why not just call it another transsexual site? Maybe I am being too critical? I just believe when you have a couple of the best transsexual sites on your network, then you add this new site that is promoted as something groundbreaking, I expect to see something besides what would only be average transsexual scenes on their other transsexual sites. Which is the percentage to know, 100% of the scenes have a transsexual in them. |
|
01-12-22 08:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
177
|
Panty Pops
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very fetish-related content, but does deviate from the fetish.
There are 145 scenes.
Beautiful models that fit the fetish with mostly plump butts.
POV-filmed and I think this fetish has to be.
Should interest panty lovers, leg lovers and some scenes stick with that fetish.
Newer videos have up to 1080p, but make note of the first con. |
| Cons: |
If you are really into this fetish the older scenes stick with the fetish, but their highest quality download is 480p. It looks like the site was maybe sold and taken into a different direction.
Some of the scenes don't even go into the fetish of the site. They are good sex scenes, but I would like to see more of the fetish.
No longer updating. |
| Bottom Line: |
A Panty Pop fetish is unique since it combines multiple genres of porn. Panty Pops include the female wearing a pretty pair of panties, bending over in front of the camera, taking the guy's dick and rubbing it against her panties. The progression adds sticking the dick inside the panties with the pussy rubbing against the dick or rubbing the dick between the panty covered butt crack. The pop is the finale of the cum shot. In the truest sense of the fetish the panties never come off.
In the newer scenes on this site the panties are off very early in most of the scenes. It just becomes a regular POV hardcore sex scene with no fetish involved. The older scenes do the fetish as well as any site. The combination of genres includes handjobs, panties, cum on clothes (panties). When done properly, it is a very erotic handjob. I don't know enough about when the site was sold, but the earliest scenes are from 2007. The newest are 2018. You can watch the older scenes and tell a distinct difference in them and the newer scenes. It looks like tease was a big deal in 2007, but not in 2018.
The does hurt the site a little since the ones sticking to the fetish top out at 480p quality. I don't see that as a major damning point, but it is too bad they haven't remastered those old scenes. The style of the scenes also changes the length. The earlier scenes are shorter with most of them being under 10 minutes, while the newer ones that stray from the fetish are often in the 20 plus minute range. I find that interesting. When the models were teasing the guys and being more creative then just having sex the guys finished faster.
The models are all professionals except possibly some of the first ones. I do not recognize the models from the older scenes. The newer ones include Liza Rowe, Ashley Fires, Harley Dean and Richelle Ryan. These scenes and fetish are made for the curvier bottom-half models. I may be a little critical of the newer scenes, but none of the newer scenes stay with the fetish. There are a few that use the fetish to begin with, but the scenes quickly turn into standard sex. It's an interesting fetish if you are new to it especially. The older scenes are where you should start. The models are not as pretty as the models in the newer ones, but you do get to see the fetish. |
|
09-08-20 10:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
178
|
Pantyhose Creep
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the very large Fetish Network of 52 sites
The site focuses on legs, short skirts and pantyhose
Interesting premise that got my attention
Very attractive models.
Good video quality
Good yearly price with promo
There is a voyeur and exhibitionist feel to the scenes. |
| Cons: |
Questionable business ethics
Isn't updating
Download limits
Small site |
| Bottom Line: |
When I originally reviewed The Fetish Network, I was happy with it, but I'm starting to become less interested in it.
There have been several complaints about this network. I have not had a lot of the common problems others have had. There is a problem with canceling that requires you to email them and there is a download limit.
I joined the network on a year subscription and it is non-recurring. This site was the one that interested me the most on the network. I have a reverse foot fetish and usually any site with pantyhose is set up for reverse foot fetish.
I used the reverse foot fetish term in the past and a few members asked what that means. Reverse foot fetish is when the female gets as much arousal from the foot fetish or more than the male. Pantyhose leads to this since the woman has to slide them off which makes a lot of women feel sexy. The guys in porn seem to always be horny anyway, but to see women who are horny before any sex even starts is -- in my opinion -- very erotic.
You can also find reverse foot fetish on the Jerk-off Instruction sites. I don't know if it is something a female would notice more, but the sheer pantyhose often shows how wet the woman is before the action starts.
This site does that well. The scenes are setup by a "perverted" man filming an unaware young woman. I don't know if this would hurt the fantasy for some, but most of the models don't have panties on under their short skirts. The guy becomes braver. This is shown by him moving closer and closer. Oops, he blew his cover or something else. He talks to the woman about how he would like to photograph her for a photography shoot. This leads to him asking for sex and that leads to the best part.
They deny him, but agree to tease, strip and even masturbate for his camera. That for me is enough to show the reverse foot fetish. She's as aroused as he is by him looking at her feet, thighs and everything her pantyhose shows.
That also shows the downside to this network. There are only 44 scenes on the site and it hasn't updated in years. The network has a similar problem. They have a lot of interesting and well-produced scenes, but I can't tell if anything is updating.
It might also show my very specific niche interests which isn't easy to fulfill.
I am in my 6th month of my membership and the sites that interested me the most, including this one, have not updated during those 6 months.
It was a good promo price back around Christmas and I really can't complain about my overall experience since I haven't had any of the problems others have. It makes me wonder if the year promo doesn't have download limits and non-recurring means I don't have to go through what sounds like a frustrating process.
This site would rate in the 90 range or higher just by itself if they had even 150-200 of these scenes. Be sure to make note of the other comments left on the network's page here. I can't verify the problems, but enough people have had them it's hard to ignore. I won't be rejoining once the year is up since I already have everything I want from the network. |
|
07-14-20 08:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
179
|
PJ Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I found the Eastern European models to be very pretty
4K is an option
Very different for a site with women who are alone (see below)
Bonus scenes as a reward for long term membership
Interesting pussy classifications
No download limits
Daily update of either a video or a photoset |
| Cons: |
Not much variety in the models or the locations
The scenes can become boring if this is not your taste (see below)
No discount offered by Porn Users. This site is not cheap, but worth it for the quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Most sites that have women showing off their bodies are primarily photo sites with a few videos that are not well done. Some other sites focus on videos of women masturbating. While the videos on this site sometimes have masturbation, the ones I like the best are those where the woman is proudly exhibiting her girly parts.
Some of my friends and I have shared with each other that we have a fantasy fetish of being examined by a gynecologist. There is just a tingly feeling we get knowing a man is seeing what makes us women. While there are no men as doctors or as any other role on the site in any scene, the use of a speculum is a part of a medical fetish. Some scenes use an endoscope to have a camera show what is deep inside. Here you will also find a pussycam, as well as a metallic gizmo pussy spreader, both things I had no idea existed before this.
The main focus on the site is a lot of pussy spreading and even gaping vaginally. In some scenes, there is a second or even a third woman. You might expect some lesbian sex, but there is none. When the scene evolves to the point where I would have expecting pussy licking, fingering or clit massaging, they put on a show just for you. The focus changes from them and what would make them happy, to what would make you happy to see. What you see is the women spreading each other, showing each other to the camera and that often involves mirroring. I find that insanely hot as both women are doing the same things side by side and it makes for some unforgettable heat and striking visuals. Sometimes there is fisting or a focus on using dildos or wands on each other. I got the feeling that the site is made for me and my pleasure and they do most definitely try hard to please.
The type of scene that I liked best were the outdoor exhibitionist ones. In most of those the women were in a secluded safe place such as under a bridge. A quick glance to see if it is safe and then a little more explicit. Eventually they are there, as carefree with their bodies as the day they were born. Many of these women clearly enjoy the sexy show that makes them moist. Some other scenes were shot indoors on a bed or on a staircase. I liked those scenes as well, but there is something daring and stimulating about risking getting caught outdoors.
Many times I felt that the women were too attractive to do such extreme spreading, but that is part of what makes this site so effective. You come here for the models and they leave you speechless with their performances. Nearly all the models are Czech or from another Eastern European country. Those places have mostly thin white women, so there is not much diversity. A few are a little older, at least one is pregnant, and I found some are porn stars I recognize, such as Lexi Dona. Some may be amateurs, but I just don’t know. I was surprised to see two black women mixed in. That leads me to wonder, could I do this? I can’t, I am not that kind of daring or self confident. I can see this site as something I can relate to as a woman and that is saying a lot.
The site has tags and they seem to be adequate, as is the ease with which I used the website. One thing also worth mentioning is that pussies are classified as shaved with over 1100 videos, trimmed over 300, hairy 36, huge almost 500, tight 200, juicy almost 300, and tongue 90 videos, which is a pussy with an extra fold. I am sure there is an overlap here as a shaved pussy might also be a juicy one. There has been a history of a video or a photo update every day and the archive is large with over 1400 videos. You even get extra bonus videos for a membership of at least three months.
For me the site was interesting, but the scenes may get boring for those looking for more sex. This site works for me, but I think for some people my advice would be a one month membership. I would add that you get what you pay for. The site is well worth the price, but wish there was a discount. |
|
10-28-21 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
180
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
It's not the first time I have heard about the "me too" part. If he was a pastor, a doctor, a psychologist, someone from a field that values morals and dignity, maybe I would look more into one of the American creations to ruin or cancel successful people, but he's a man that has been paying, likely, desperate and broke young women for sex for 20 years, then it would matter more to me. It is why I said the part about Americans. I don't care what others have labeled him as or alleged. He's a porn producer and performer. He's likely the easiest person, in Puritan America, to blame for taking advantage of women.
|
05-15-22 06:52am
|
Reply
181
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Porn Fidelity chose to name their site with the word Fidelity. The two founders were Ryan and Kelly Madison. They made their marriage the heart of the site. You said I am saying it's the heart of the site. You used the Covid-time to show they are not even active. You showed 2, maybe 3 years, the site has been active for 18+ years. What about the other 15 years? Were Kelly and Ryan in more scenes than everyone else? Was the basis of the site them picking up other women? Is that content still available on this site? The recent content does not make up the entire site and I reviewed the entire site not just the recent updates.
You act like no one is right about their marriage being what these sites were based on when they started. You could correct Rabbit, his reviews have talked about their marriage. You could correct TBP, their current review talks about their marriage's importance to the site. If you know the site as well as you're saying, you would know that. I have had a year membership for a total of 6 different years to the site. I come from a country where men are allowed to practice infidelity without their wives being allowed to say anything. It's a learned environmental fetish for me.
|
05-11-22 12:03pm
|
Review
182
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Arguably my favorite hardcore site when combined with Teen Fidelity, which comes with it.
There are close to 1,000 scenes just on Porn Fidelity. It updates weekly.
High quality downloads that include up to 5K now, not that I download 5K.
Each video comes with standard pictures and even behind the scenes pictures too.
Easy navigation for a site/network of three sites.
I join it for a year at a time. They have great yearly promos about twice per year. |
| Cons: |
The download limit will be a problem for those that download a lot. You can only download 15 scenes per week. On the plus side, there are BTS videos you can still download and they have a counter on your screen that tells you how many downloads you have left.
I don’t know if this is a con or not, but I usually prefer the Teen Fidelity scenes over the Porn Fidelity scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kelly and Ryan Madison own, operate and perform on the sites included with Porn Fidelity. It’s promoted as showcasing a healthy marriage. I am not one to disagree with that since I have only had an unhealthy marriage and divorce. I do think it’s funny that others have mentioned Ryan seems happier than Kelly. He gets his hot wife and his teen playtoys. What kind of marriage is that? Kelly does seem to enjoy being the voyeur. If so, that’s the steps for a healthy marriage.
It is a big part of this being my favorite hardcore site. There’s a reason to believe everything happening is for the best. No one is mad or jealous. The download limit is a sticking point for some people. I know the longtime members were not happy about it. I have all the older scenes that I wanted and being limited to 60 per month, when I have an ongoing membership, is not that limiting. I do think that’s why they put the limit in to increase yearly memberships.
They have close to the best production values considering they do not have props or niches like BDSM to turn to. It’s just raw sex. It takes a lot of talent to pull that off without redundancy. Their quality is a major pro. I download the HD videos. I don’t know why there is 5K. I didn’t like 4K when I tried it. The HD videos are sparkling clear on my monitor and look as good as any hardcore videos.
What this site does is bring in friends and women that Ryan wants to have sex with. Lucky husband? What did he do in a past life to deserve that? I do joke a lot on the comment section. Does he tell Kelly, “I want steak tonight, a baked potato and salad with a side of your hot friend for dessert”? I do believe they have a good sense of humor about all of it. It’s why their scenes are so good. I have had other members of their site post and say they’re having marriage problems. That’s not my business. I’m not American, I don’t live in other people’s lives. I talk about what I can see not what someone else says. I have all but banned myself from commenting on the scenes.
They update three times a week on Porn Fidelity and I think that’s too much. I believe they could get away with two, possibly one update per week. It does it make it feel like they’re trying to stress your download limit with three updates per week. That’s 12 per month, I only have 15 downloads per month and there’s another site that’s updating.
There’s nothing obscure or that unique on the site. They’re not pushing limits. I do believe that will be the downside of having husband and wife on the site. They’re getting older and maybe desires and wishes change. They have an interesting way of handling their pictures. You can download the standard pictures just like from any other site, but I recommend the behind the scenes pictures. Those are the only ones I’ve ever seen on a site and I prefer those. They do everything right as far as I’m concerned. Their style of porn has a built-in story and they don’t try and change it. It’s not broke. Easily in my top 5 sites. |
|
05-11-22 07:33am
Replies (5)
|
Review
183
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-around excellent hardcore site.
Production values, technical quality and performances are all top notch.
858 scenes to be downloaded or streamed.
Downloadable photo set with each scene and behind the scenes photos as well.
Comes with the even better (in my opinion) Teen Fidelity site and Kelly Madison's solo site.
Scenes are typically long (30-45 minutes) and are well played out (doesn't feel as planned). |
| Cons: |
The videos autoplay when you click on each scene. They also fill your whole screen. You have to untick the box in corner of the screen to stop the full screen autoplay, but even then it still autoplays, just not full screen.
They try to appeal to everyone with their model choices and when you do that, there will always be some male and female talent the viewers don't like. One recent scene features a man completely covered with tattoos. It just depends on the viewer's feel about body modifications.
There is a download limit that doesn't bother me as much as it might others. I have been a member for 9 months (bought a year membership last year). The download limit is 15 scenes per week. I think it depends on what your interests are. It is a terribly low number that equals out to 2 scenes per day, but I have what I want from the older scenes so I don't really notice the limit. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member on this site for close to 9 months. I reviewed Teen Fidelity (93) awhile back and really like it. Porn Fidelity is very similar to Teen Fidelity except the scenes are not as teen focused. The husband in the duo, Ryan Madison, is featured on both sites and gets to play with the teens. There are teens (or they look like teens to me) on Porn Fidelity too. Their sites have a feeling of friendly, even comforting settings. It is as if the models are just visiting Ryan and Kelly in their home. And a porn scene breaks out.
For all the technical greatness of the site there is that pop-out full screen autoplay feature to frustrate. If you plan on scanning through the scenes make sure to put on headphones or mute the tab. There are other workarounds including extensions for your browser that will stop the video from playing, but it's best to just mute the tab. Just because Kelly and Ryan are understanding about their interest and love of sex and porn -- doesn't mean everyone's household is!
The older content should be expected to be of much lesser quality, but the oldest scenes (2003) even have 720p on most of them. The newest videos have the highest resolution download options, including -- 5K, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I think they need to slow down. I haven't even made it to 4K yet! The files are huge and should be noted. The 5K of a newer scene is 13.55 GB, the 4K is 9.07 GB, the 1080p is 4.59 GB and the 720p is 2.49 GB.
Most of these scenes start out with the male and female dressed, conversing, and it builds into a kiss. There isn't the typical rushed feel with the scenes like on most hardcore sites. The picture sets also capture this well. I wouldn't put this in a heartcore category or anything other than hardcore. Which is what makes the content good to me. It starts out like it's going to be one of those melancholy music playing scenes, then turns into a hardcore sex scene filled with passion and intensity.
I was made aware of a new download limit that only allows 15 downloads per week. This isn't something I had noticed since I have been a member for 9 months and don't have any catching up to do. I do not know if there is a different join option to get unlimited downloads, but when I first joined in my current membership it was unlimited or at the very least not as low as 2 scenes per day. I have different feelings about download limits. I was originally only streaming porn when I first started watching it. I do think 2 scenes per day is a low number, but I don't think it's a deal breaker considering they only release one new scene a week. I do think it promotes buying a longer-term membership if you're wanting to download a lot of the older scenes.
I haven't downloaded a lot from Porn Fidelity as I prefer Teen Fidelity and have every scene from it. As a package along with the Kelly Madison solo site, this is still one of the best deals in porn, especially if you value quality over quantity thanks to the download limit. |
|
09-08-20 11:09pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
184
|
Pretty Dirty
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best story-driven, fetish sites I have been a member of.
Includes access to Adult Time, over 56,000 videos.
Rare scenes that are interesting enough to watch from start to finish.
Dark taboo fetishes are explored.
Surprisingly attractive models for this type of content.
Seems to be replaced by the site Pure Taboo, but this content -- in my opinion, is better than the Pure Taboo content and worth downloading, I'm not usually a downloader.
Stopped updating at 206 scenes, but all 206 scenes are worth downloading.
Good acting for a porn site. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating, Pure Taboo has similar content, but I would call it more toned down than Pretty Dirty.
It's too bad they didn't do more of the more intense scenes like the one called "Indirect Relations" as scenes like it really push the boundaries of the viewer and the industry. |
| Bottom Line: |
A site like this is hard to find. I get the feeling they came up with a story, probably rehearsed it (without the sex), then cast the scene and filmed it.
The scene "Indirect Relations" could be worth the cost of the membership. It casts a corrupt male cop into the main role. He has a prostitute girlfriend. He enlists a drug addict to help with is plan to have a night of sex including his daughter. The actors/models in the scene give a believable performance that makes you a little uncomfortable and a little aroused at the same time.
The rest of the scenes on Pretty Dirty are also good. Most are not as dark or as intense as the one mentioned, but the producer of this content does a great job of making believable, but shouldn't be thought about scenarios.
While there are only 206 scenes, I have downloaded all 206. My external hard drive has 386 scenes total on it, making more than half of them from this site.
The video quality is excellent on the scenes with 1080p option and there is an atmospheric feel to many of the scenes. It all feels -- pretty dirty.
Some of these scenes go into common porn niches, but they make them more believable. The scene, "Make Me a Cuckold" has a believable violent feel to it. It doesn't surprise me this site became Pure Taboo as some of this content does a believable job of showing forced acts. In Make Me a Cuckold, one guy fights and restrains the husband, while the other guy slams his dick into the wife's mouth until she's choking.
I am not a person that is into anything violent, but the balance between "this is believable" and "this is scripted" is just right. Usually, only a site like Kink can pull this off, but the producers on this one do a very good job of it.
These scenes make me think this is what Vivid Studios from the early 2000's, would be like if they stuck to their formula from back then. They followed societal trends in their scenes. I think they would have become a more rough, violent studio.
These are also the first scenes I've watched from beginning to end just like I have Vivid's classic scenes.
There's a lot of the sister scenes on here which I think are fairly common these days, but unlike most of those, they also have brother ones like, "Take Your Brother's Virginity" and "Brotherly Betrayal" where the woman or sister is more in control.
I have mixed feelings about Adult Time mainly because they made Vivid nearly impossible to find the full DVDs, but sites like this one make Adult Time a must join just for these scenes.
I would rate it higher and probably should. I don't know if I will ever join another site that I download 100% of their videos from. I think if Pure Taboo was closer to this style of content it would boost the score of this site, but it looks like we will have to wait for another studio to blend the emotions of anger, fear, sex like Pretty Dirty does. At least I have 206 scenes to hold me over until then. |
|
09-16-19 11:44pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
185
|
Pride Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay network that is run by the same people as Adult Time. With this many gay sites I have to wonder if they will eventually have a Gay Adult Time or just add all the Gay scenes to Adult Time? This is the second gay network I have reviewed from Gamma.
Nine sites are included and combined they have 4,502 videos.
Videos are downloadable with the subscription I bought, but they do also offer a streaming membership as well, make sure to pay attention when signing up.
This is just an observation: There are more masculine men on this network than other gay networks I have been on. I see the word “bear” a lot and you get the bigger build, hairy (beards, chests) here than on other gay networks.
Currently averaging 4 updates per week.
Plenty of scenes here for straight women to enjoy too. |
| Cons: |
If you have any kind of preconceived notion of what a gay man looks like or acts like, it is probably going to be messed up by this network. A lot of these guys look like big, burly lumberjacks and athletes. I am listing that in cons for the gay men readers who prefer the twinks.
Just an outsider’s opinion, there is not as much to do in gay sex as straight sex. I join gay sites for the solo scenes, but some of these guys in male/male scenes were sexy enough to watch and I just felt like they need to add a woman. That is an idea even. How about a site where a woman masturbates while two men have sex? |
| Bottom Line: |
These are the sites you receive with this network:
Pride Studios
Bearback
Cock Virgins
Circle Jerk Boys
Boyz Party
Dylan Lucas
Extra Big Dicks
High Performance Men
Men Over 30
Being in my 30s, I really do not see a lot of these guys looking like they’re under 30. I am saying that in response to their site “Men Over 30”. Most of these guys look in their 30s to 40s. There is a total of 2,543 different guys. This is a large network. They also offer photos and their count is just over 250,000 total photos. They have some niches here that I had not seen before like Beards and Bulges, Husbands in Lockdown and I think those could interest straight women.
My main interest is the solo videos. This did create a problem. They do not have categories. They have tags so if you find a solo scene you will see the solo tag, BUT you cannot click it. They have 10-20 tags per scene, but none are clickable. This left me with one option and that was to use the search box. I am getting mixed results with that. A few test examples based on their tags:
I searched for “solo”
Eight of the first twelve scenes that came up are solo. Which is not bad, but it does show a weakness when trying to find specific tags/niches.
I searched for “jerking off” which is one of their tags.
The first problem is it doubled every scene so there is Live Life, Scene #02 listed twice in the first 12 results. Of the first 12 results for jerking off, only 3 are solo guys.
It’s going to take some work to find all the solo scenes, but there is a large collection of them that I have already downloaded (100+).
I don’t know if I am just not very knowledgeable about gay porn or sex, but the site Circle Jerk Boys, which I expected to be a group of guys masturbating together really isn’t. It has a few scenes where the guys are masturbating together, but most of those turn into standard sex.
That is really my biggest complaint. Make the content easier to sort and search. This is the first site (gay, straight, transsexual) I have been on that has tags that are not clickable.
You do get very good quality videos. It is similar to Adult Time’s video download options with 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
It looks like for the current situation with the pandemic they are releasing compilation videos and that is okay with me since I didn’t have any of the content. I cannot speak for gay men, but this network does lean more towards the big, athletic, bear type male models than twinks. Some of the most commonly seen tags are “Athletic”, “Beefy”, “Muscular” and “Jock Strap”.
Besides the issue with finding what you are looking for this is a very good network. |
|
06-17-20 05:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
186
|
Prime Cups
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site for the big, nice, boob lovers.
184 scenes and while not updating, there are some 4K scenes so it’s been updated some.
A major turn-on for me, most of the cumshots go on the female’s boobs.
I want to say these are some of Europe’s biggest name models. I recognize several names including Nekane and Anissa Kate.
Pleasing backgrounds and settings with most of the scenes in a house with neutral/white colors.
High quality on the videos, downloadable picture sets too |
| Cons: |
It hasn’t been updated in a year and it looks like they even recycled some OR they remastered some old scenes to HD quality. The newest scenes top out at 720p and 1080p, while a lot of their newer scenes have 4K.
It’s one of those sites that seems like it should be bigger than it is like part of the content is gone or missing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site doesn’t fool around with any tricks or surprises or gimmicks. These are busty women, many of them are slim built and I do believe all or most are all-natural with no implants. The models are very attractive and I’m going to con this one a little – professional. It’s a complaint I have with the site that I believe is purely subjective and therefore chose not to list it as a con. Some of these models just look bored. The scenes feature full sex, anal sex, oral and some titty-sex, but the scenes with more than one woman, usually the one not getting much attention looks like she would rather be doing anything else. Maybe they are going for that?
This is a site that the cumshot shows back up as my favorite part. I love watching how other women react to cum hitting their boobs and bodies. The site’s scene count does seem low to me at only 184 scenes, but I only say that because the site’s first scene was uploaded on December 6, 2005. That’s nearly 16 years and only 184 scenes. It creates some frustration with this site. When it first started they were updating once a week. Only the newest 30 scenes are from the last decade. Which has its positives and negatives to it. I’m learning the European models from a decade ago were quite a bit more attractive to me than the current European models are, but you then have the possibility of poor video quality. I can at least say there’s some good news. At least half of the scenes have at worst 720p and 1080p download options. Some of the newer ones have 4K. Also, so of the older scenes that don’t have 720p or 1080p at least have 540p. I find those still watchable. The oldest scenes drop down into the 384p area and while watchable are just not that good.
I find it surprising this site hasn’t updated more or wasn’t more successful than it looks like it was. Nearly every scene has a 4.25 user rating or higher on a 5 scale. And it’s earned. The scenes could be looked at as an opposite of facial scenes. It’s sex that leads to a body cumshot with these very nice boobs taking the center stage. There are some stunning models on this site as well, ones I have never seen or heard of. The scenes are typically long (by current standards), nearing the 40 minute average on most. The tags help more on this site than most, especially depending on your preference. Some of the scenes don’t have any anal or vaginal sex. You can find those with the tags, if the tags are accurate. I do think the possibility of sex happening in some scenes, while others don’t have sex, also makes the site more interesting than your average porn site. You have to watch the scenes.
The picture sets are definitely worth looking into. This group or studio seems to be big on quality and it shows in the pictures as much, if not more, than in the videos. These are some of the crispest photos I’ve seen. The score could be and would be a lot higher if there was a reason to believe there will be more of these scenes, but there is a feeling that this site has stopped updating unless they are remastering, which I do have a reason to believe they have done on 4 scenes. The score will reflect both sides of it. I really like the content, the models, and everything that’s going on with the site, but you may only need to join it once to get everything you want. This would be a good place to add the download speeds are good. I have a 100M speed internet and download above average what I do on other sites. |
|
09-07-21 04:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
187
|
Private Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Reply
Understood, I wasn't born until the 80's so anything before the 90's doesn't interest me as much. I also didn't know much about the studio except the first porn I watched was from it.
|
07-01-20 06:28am
|
Reply
188
|
Private Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Comment
I'm not for sure what "signed talent" means, but Pierre Woodman only produced 48 of the 350 DVDs on here.
|
06-26-20 05:20pm
|
Review
189
|
Private Classics
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vintage and classic porn DVDs from the 1960s – early 2000s.
Downloadable magazine photo sets from the Private magazines also going back to the 1960s.
The site is laid out well, with selections for movies, models, magazines, 00s, 90s, 80, 70s, 60s, also has a section for black and castings.
Currently have exactly 400 models with some having over 100 scenes each.
Just under 1,900 scenes, unlimited downloads.
Can also search by full DVDs, there are around 300 full DVDs, including the very first porn DVD I watched. |
| Cons: |
I am not for sure how much of a con this is, but the videos have only one download option. Besides that, a lot of these scenes seem very short (some under 5 minutes).
No category search or tags
They have updated, but there are no dates and no way to know how often they update.
The filenames do not have the DVD’s title in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of my favorite sites is Vivid. I only watch their “classic” DVDs. The stories are usually at least better than we see in current DVDs and I think the models are more believably into the scenes as in newer porn DVDs. I was recommended this site as similar to Vivid Classics and in some ways, it is, in other ways it is not.
I do like the magazines section. Being from India, I have very little experience with the porn magazines and seeing the photo shoots from those shows how much porn has progressed.
One part I misread was I thought I also received access to private.com, which has their newer scenes on it, but you have to join it separately.
I have not watched a lot of the oldest scenes. I like the 90s and 2000s. They not only have some story and continuity from scene to scene, but also do not feel like current porn. The production does not seem as planned out. When I watch newer DVD scenes it seems like they follow the same exact plan from start to finish in every scene. These scenes sometimes will just have oral or a quick sex scene that leads into the next scene. It is too bad these DVDs cannot be downloaded as one whole part. Considering the scenes are mostly standard definition (480p range), it makes the files small and I would think a full DVD would be under 1GB.
There is a good selection of models. I know of some of them. And even though it seems like some of the scenes have been edited, these are still the only porn DVDs I really like. You can even get a porn history lesson here by watching the DVDs from the different decades. I think I would call it the evolution of the cumshot. The older scenes were mostly body cumshots, then the boobs cumshots and into facials in the newer scenes.
I do not know why these older scenes have a more authentic feel to them, but they do. Maybe they were better actresses?
The site really needs a tag system or categories. You are just handed the site with newest updates and have to decide what looks good without knowing what happens in the scene.
The first DVD I downloaded was Tatiana 1 which was the first porn DVD I ever watched. I thought it was older than the site lists it as 1/1/1998, but it was still fun watching it again.
There are a similar number of classic scenes here as on Vivid’s site, the quality is overall similar to Vivid’s classic scenes and the stories are as well. I think that is the market this site would appeal to. If you are into classic Vivid DVDs, I believe you would like this site. |
|
06-17-20 05:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
190
|
Priya Rai Official
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All the videos are in High Definition and are exclusive
There are 71 sites in the Puba Network
Downloads are fast
I'm always interested in models from India |
| Cons: |
Videos are not dated
I think that the site is no longer adding new content. With only 52 videos it is just too small
No interaction with her fans on the site, but there is a link to her Twitter account
I don’t like that she has implants and uses too much makeup
Not enough straight or lesbian sex |
| Bottom Line: |
There are very few Indian women who make porn, as it is illegal there. The women who are pornstars live in other countries, such as the UK, Canada or the United States. Priya was born in New Delhi, but was adopted by an American couple and raised as an American. What we have in common is that I was also born in India, but I am an American by choice.
Before becoming a porn star, she was a lingerie and swimwear model, then a stripper for 12 years. She is comfortable showing her body and is best on this site in her solo scenes. For six years she was a major pornstar and won industry awards for best new starlet, best group sex scene and later in her career for best MILF. She retired for six years and when she decided on a comeback, it was to create this website.
I can only assume she did not have the rights to her earlier huge catalog of scenes, as the ones here were made in more recent years. She was in her forties when she opened the site. She fell into a common strategy among older models and has implants and uses too much makeup. Some women age well and some honestly just don’t. I feel that her videos here are not comparable to her videos from years ago.
Here she has 52 videos and photo sets. Since the review by Rabbits Reviews in April 2019, the site has added only one video and one photo set. The updates don’t say when they were posted, so I think the site is not still growing. There is no interaction with her on the site, but there is a link to her Twitter account.
A few scenes are boy/girl, a few even show foot jobs, lesbian or are mutual masturbation, but most are of her alone. She uses fingers, dildos, vibrators and toys as well as a sybian and a rocking chair. I have never seen one of those on a porn site. Her range of abilities and sexual appetite don’t shine through as she doesn’t have enough scenes with partners.
The site is rather simple and uncomplicated and every video is in High Definition, but none are 4K. There are more photo sets than videos, but they were just ok. I am not into photos and would not care much anyway. I was not sure what to expect when I logged onto the site for the first time. But after spending time on the site, I do feel she could have done better. |
|
09-07-21 05:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
191
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Public exhibitionism porn with a little disgracing.
470 scenes that include downloadable videos and photos.
Broad array of models are featured here, shapes, sizes, colors.
The outdoor scenes are my favorite and are the best examples of public exhibitionism I have seen.
The scenes are full of different fetishes. Anal, DP, multiple cumshots, hose, legs, oral, vaginal, sex toys, it's the closest I have seen to a site that brings up the old saying of "everything but the kitchen sink". |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating in January of 2019, the site had a banner on it that said there was going to be new content over the summer, but it never transpired.
The newer scenes feel more contrived. There's less feeling of spontaneity. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the type of site I could really get into. The majority of scenes start with a naked woman being walked around in public or displayed indoors for people to look at. The disgrace part is usually not that disgraceful.
The scenes all have a familiar start, but after the start there really is no way to know where the scene is going. I think that's a very important part of a niche site like this. You know the woman is going to have sex, probably anal sex, probably oral sex and get cummed on, but you don't know how many guys are going to be involved, if another woman is going to show up and maybe give her oral or use a Magic Wand on her or where they will end up as far as the location.
I didn't list it as a pro or con, but one part I think falls between those is the length of the scenes. Some of these scenes are over an hour long and they can be tiresome to the viewer. Just when you think they've settled into a position, they change positions, change rooms or locations and everything starts over again. I'm not for sure how to grade that part. It's good in some scenes and very distracting in other scenes.
I do know that most of the scenes are very hot even if you want to grab them and tell them to stop moving around so much. The women on this site seem to be well-prepared for the multiple penetrations and that takes away the disgrace part for me. You will see a few acts of what I would call violence, like slaps and spitting, but usually the woman is as aggressive as the men.
I don't think no new updates hurts it unless you already have all the scenes. At 470 scenes, most averaging nearly an hour, it's not likely that you're going to run out of this content if you're really into it.
The public part could be questioned as a lot of the scenes are indoors with an audience. This is like the previous might be a pro, might be a con, I think some of the hottest scenes on it are the indoor ones. Maybe it just makes the performers more comfortable.
The production quality is good, but I do think they could use more direction or more cameras. Sometimes the action is focused on where there's not much action.
It's still a very good site on an excellent network and worth checking out if you're into exhibitionism. |
|
11-04-19 09:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
192
|
Puffy Network
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The network has almost 2200 scenes and 900 models.
Most updates available in 4K for no extra charge.
Has links to get other discounts.
Excellent quality videos, but poor photosets.
There are no download limits.
I think there are more tags for searching than anybody has anywhere. |
| Cons: |
The models are not always attractive with not much variety in body type or ethnically.
The models don’t talk so it is hard to get to know them. |
| Bottom Line: |
It is a tradition that men join porn sites more than women and the content you commonly find is mostly what men like. While there are many things I liked about this network, it is aimed more at men than women. Let’s just start with the name. When women think about getting puffy, it means uncomfortable and wishing it was over. Here puffy refers to the site Wet and Puffy, where pussy pumps make them bigger and more prominent. I have no interest in that. I watch porn to see women in action that I can identify with and go along with the fantasy of it being me. It is not so much to stare at outsized pussies. Maybe outsized hard cocks might work for me, but they are not to be found on this network. Even then, I want to see them being used, not just to look at.
Besides the pussy pump being something I have never seen before, another is the pussypedia classifications for the three types of pussy. One is Puffy Peach, another Big Taco and the last is Big Cherry. These labels refer to the relative sizes of the inner and outer labia. While interesting, I can’t honestly say I care that much.
The tag system is confusing. If you search using “pissing” you get 315 videos. If you look under “peeing” you get 123. You may well ask how could this be? They have too many tags, a true double edged sword. While having many of them is a great idea and you can use the tags with precision, having too many creates chaos. To compound it all they have an advanced search to further refine your efforts. I saw one video that had yes, it is true, well over 50 tags.
These are the five sites in the network:
Simply Anal - 160 updates and not just anal. Women having anal with both men and women. Not only anal, but oral and vaginal. Cumshots can be anywhere.
Eurobabes Facials - 44 scenes and no longer updating.
We Like to Suck - about 400 videos and not just blowjobs. About 300 videos include ball sucking, for me a big plus.
Wet and Pissy - almost 550 videos. Masturbation with objects, as well as pissing.
Wet and Puffy over 1000 videos. Masturbation with objects.
The women are mostly from Eastern Europe and don’t talk. They look to be about 18 to 30 and some are well known stars, for example Lady Dee and Gina Gerson. I am no expert on famous stars, but these two are on nearly every site from Eastern Europe. For the most part the models are just doing what they are told to do and not how they feel. I found them to be just mechanical and not easy to identify with. I like to see myself as in the scene with them, but that rarely happens here.
The site advertises that all the scenes are exclusive and you get a large enough archive with nearly 2200 video updates and poor quality photo sets. Recently the network has been adding five updates a week, which is not bad at all. Most videos can be downloaded in quality as high as 4K and there is no extra charge for it like you see on some other sites. They have smaller sizes, including ones for cell phones.
There are a few other more minor criticisms. One is that the user name and passwords are randomly generated and make no sense. When you first sign up there are boxes that are already checked to join other sites. I was looking on the opposite side of the page and almost did not see I had to uncheck the boxes. However, if you are interested in other sites, they have seven pages with links for discounts. Right now there is a sale price of $7.95 a month as an early Black Friday special. |
|
11-10-21 12:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
193
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Six excellent PureCFNM sites are included in the subscription.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
Uses CCBill for easy billing and cancellation.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. 4K is not an option.
Has some of the best porn for women to enjoy.
Logging into the network gets you access to every site very easily.
Still updating despite the pandemic. August had 15 new scenes. |
| Cons: |
No easy search ability. It is adequate though.
Some of the sites in the network have degradation of men. I am not a fan of that. |
| Bottom Line: |
The amount of porn aimed at women is rather limited and it is probably the most untapped market in porn. However, this network is about as good as it gets. I like that many newer scenes are more interactive between the women and the men. I like that the sites are evolving to where the women start off clothed then gradually go to partially or fully nude. That has not always been the case for CFNM sites, and in the past that was true of this one also. The women are a mix of both amateurs and pros and I think for this type of porn that works well. The amateurs look like someone you could know, nicely dressed, but with a British accent. The amateurs look very real and there reactions are very believable and genuine. In many scenes they are wearing sexy pantyhose and I have a hose fetish. They don’t have any Indian women and there sure are plenty in the UK. I volunteer to be the first.
Pure CFNM is the main site here. It has been around a long time, so some of the oldest videos are SD quality. There are 760 scenes and have a little bit of story to them.
Amateur CFNM is not completely amateur as I recognized a handful of pornstars. The amateurs are not perfect looking models, but they have a genuine charm that I like.166 scenes.
Lady Voyeurs has a great future as it has a theme that is rare and quite entertaining. Men masturbate for the women to get pleasure from watching. The scenes just get better and better with each update. The women have become more actively involved and show enthusiasm as well as some skin. 286 scenes.
CFNM Games is a small site that was fun, but sometimes quite unbelievable. There are only 24 scenes, but I feel they are very much hit and miss.
Girls Abuse Guys and Hey Little Dick have degradation of men as a theme. Sometimes they are a bit over the top, between name calling and spitting there is not much to like in my mind. I like pegging, but not abusively. GAG has 91 scenes and HLD has 134.
There have been updates even during the pandemic and August had 15. The totals for the network are 1461 scenes and 672 models. I highly recommend the network as I downloaded more than half of those scenes. |
|
09-08-20 10:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
194
|
Pure POV
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Really pretty models shot in POV.
Long to longer scenes in the 30-45 minute range.
Despite being a small site (70 scenes) and the updates stopping over a decade ago, the content is either remastered or they were releasing 1080p videos over a decade ago. The technical quality doesn’t show the age of the site.
Videos are downloadable as are professional photo sets and also downloadable screenshots.
Good diversity in the scenes/action. The site doesn’t stick to one formula from scene to scene. |
| Cons: |
It’s a difficult con to list since I wouldn’t have known it if the dates on the scenes hadn’t told me this site hasn’t been updated in over 10 years.
Other than that and the small collection of 70 scenes, I am someone who likes POV and 70 scenes of high quality POV isn’t really a con to me, but believe it should be listed in cons. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is one of those that makes me wonder what other sites have been doing for the last 15 years. The newest update on this site is nearly 13 years old, but the models are very pretty and the quality of the video only drops out on the oldest 20 scenes. It even only drops to 540p. The rest of the scenes have 720p and 1080p download options.
The lack of story is expected due to it being European. I’m still waiting on more of those European studios to discover the use of English subtitles. The POV filming on this site is very good. You get various locations, some cosplay, indoors, outdoors, and it looks like this site at one time was a pretty big deal. I do not know these models, but have read multiple PU members talk about the European models of the 2000s and I see what they mean. There’s hardly a dud in any of these models. The action is professional and maybe that could be not as good to some. There’s not a lot of variance or uniqueness other than the POV camera.
If I have any complaint about the content it’s that some of the scenes just seem too casual. One of the scenes has a woman doing anal and she looks like she’s just sitting back watching a television show. There are no scenes with more than two people in the scene and I usually do find that as a negative. I believe porn needs to look into the competitive aspect of having multiple women in one scene with one man. It just seems like when it’s one on one there’s not as much energy.
I do believe the site is at least worth looking into if you’re into POV and especially blonde models. There are multiple blonde models on this site that really stand out to me. Their names are generic enough that I don’t know if there’s anyway to look them up, like Sabrina, Ildiko and Eva.
There are 70 scenes. Those can be downloaded with no limits and there are downloadable photo sets as well as downloadable screenshots. I could see downloading 40-50 of the scenes they do have and being happy with that. I’m not going to score it as high as the quality deserves to be scored, just because there seems to be no way they’ll ever start updating this site again, but will score it high enough to at least nudge you to check it out if you get the chance. I’m pleasantly surprised with the content. |
|
08-31-21 08:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
195
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Dark, moody, roleplay porn that I forgot to review.
They are now up to 285 scenes with regular weekly updates.
Excellent, even believable acting and stories that are much better than the average site.
Production values are as high on this site as any site.
Scenes are long, but not too long, average around 45 minutes.
Plays on all the popular taboos including stepfamily, betrayal and trickery. |
| Cons: |
The writing is good, the acting is good, but they do have some scenes that try to be too dark story wise. It could make some uncomfortable.
It's too bad they can't release more than one scene per week. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was going to review Pure Taboo a few months ago, but there were already two new reviews for it at the time. I almost forgot about reviewing it. This is easily one of my favorite "normal" sites. I know it is strange to call a taboo site "normal", but I do see it that way. The production values, acting and writing are all top-notch for a porn site. There are times that the males overact in attempted "intimidation" roles.
The video quality is very good with all 285 scenes have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. The most recent 164 scenes also have 4K. I was happy to see the addition of English captions as well.
The scenes also include a photo set you can download, but they are usually just 25-40 pictures in each.
I don't think Pure Taboo is that groundbreaking or even that unique. A lot of sites do the story-driven scenes, the taboos are not as taboo anymore with all the stepfamily porn sites available. Which is what pushes them ahead. They push the models to give their best possible acting performances, they use lights to change the mood of the scenes, they also do add the overacting male. That is not normal in porn. Except for those guys that sound like an elephant that got shot when they cum. Overacting in porn has always been the role of the female models. The men in most of the scenes seem to be a mix between Hannibal Lector and that big, scary professional wrestler. The Deadman guy. Each viewer will see that differently. If you are wrapped up in the story the scary or intimidating, overacting male can be very believable. I do think that separates Pure Taboo from other taboo sites or even scenes. There's a slight moment of uneasiness that tries to make you question if it's acting or real.
This site to me is the best at what it does and that is give the viewer a realistic chance to use their imagination while watching porn. Many sites with the taboo backdrop ruin the scenes with humor or the she's not really that scared overacting female model. I would recommend it to any porn fan as long as they keep in mind it's fictional. |
|
09-08-20 11:00pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
196
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There’s nothing on this site except lesbian porn.
Pretty, mostly European models that I have seen on the 21st sites and even Nubiles.
Very high quality on the videos and pictures.
Updates on average twice per week. Sometimes they have as many updates as 4 per week. It’s not a consistent update schedule.
There are currently 1,817 videos and those are mostly long videos of 40+ minutes each.
Comes with two bonus sites: Give Me Pink (still updating) and Fist Flush (which has updated for the last two months) |
| Cons: |
If you don’t like a lot of white backgrounds, the newer scenes are nearly all in a white living room. All the furniture is white. I’m not for sure what they’re going for with these white backgrounds.
In my different times as a member of this site, the quality of the sex has been hot/cold. I believe it’s because the nature of the niche is repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
One thing I can’t complain about is how pretty the models are. I can complain that the models look a lot alike. When thy do get a darker complexion model she really stands out. Especially in the all-white living room. One of the better newer scenes has Alyssa Reece and Mia Split in it. Not only does Alyssa Reece have a darker complexion, the majority of the scenes captures the outdoor greenery and even some neutral colors like tan furniture. It makes a lot of difference! That scene is so much better than the other newer scenes, it makes me think that all-white background doesn’t work with pale models.
The quality is really high on this site and the network it belongs to – Sapphix. This network is focused on women. Give Me Pink is all women. Fist Flush is women fisting women. If you’re tired of seeing hairy asses and balls this is a really good network for you. The quality on the videos includes downloads up to 4K and those have been 4K since December 2015. They also give you the options of 1080p, 720p, 540p and mobile. You won’t see many of their videos with lower than 720p. Some of their 2005 videos have 720p and 1080p. They have been doing high quality for a very long time. That is a good part. The older scenes are easily better. If you like tribbing there’s a lot of it on this site. The quality of the older videos is important not just because those are better. There are more of them. From looking at the updates, it looks like, at one time 2005-2008, they were releasing a new scene every 2-3 days. I also believe the models in the older scenes were some of the top models in the world. It seems like the older scenes were more hardcore if that’s possible. There are a lot of 3 female scenes, some of those are 3 females masturbating furiously together. I don’t see that much in newer lesbian scenes. The videos are not only downloadable, but from what I see there is no limit. The pictures are very good quality and downloadable. Those are photo sets that have file sizes reminiscent of videos, over 500 MB each.
The only complaint I really have is about the newer scenes. That white background, the models not as much into it. When I look at the models in the older scenes, I’m not surprised the models aren’t as into the scenes. Some of those old scenes have three women that are legitimate 10s. You’ll have some color-shock if you watch the older scenes. They had blue chairs and hippy looking sheets, brightly colored beach towels.
The site is very big with nearly 2,000 scenes. A lot of the prettier, sexier models in the older days of the site have over 10 scenes each. It surprised me when this site become a part of the Sapphix network. I never had any problems joining this site and being satisfied with just it. It’s almost too big by itself for a one month membership.
This is very believable, to me, lesbian porn. These women look like they are loving it (especially older scenes) and they’re really pretty to look at. I just come away with the feeling that the production changed sometime over the last 5 years, and someone took it in the wrong direction. The newer scenes try to be more softcore, but the sex is not. The models are still doing 69s and rimming even on the white furniture. I would like to see the site go back to its older style which reminded me of the old Vivid DVDs. It was pretty women doing dirty things. Maybe the all-white background has made me view those scenes as more innocent. It’s not the models are just not as into it? It’s still an easy site to recommend for those that like to see pretty women naked and doing sexual things. |
|
08-05-22 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
197
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Overwhelmingly large lesbian site that has content from as far back as 2003.
Over 1,000 models.
1,816 scenes with new updates being posted every 3 days.
Each scene includes downloadable photos and videos.
Advanced search allows the user to filter multiple tags.
Very attractive models, could possibly be a con.
Good price for all the content you get access to. |
| Cons: |
There is a professional feel to everything. The models are nearly all Europeans and the porn feels that way.
The advanced search will likely confuse just as many people as help them.
Consistency is not always a good trait. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my first time joining this site. While I am open to lesbian content, it is not my favorite and I have to be in the mood for it. This site is a good example of that. I won't deny the quality of the content or the beauty of the models, but some of the content feels forced, scripted and the newer scenes do not offer much variety. The professional feeling is a con to me. Everything looks like a porn set. This automatically loses me a little bit. You can even use the advanced search to see the actions used in each scene go in phases. It's like they pick up on what's popular and use it in every scene until it's no longer popular then they find something new to add.
That is more my subjective opinion. I have been using lesbian sites like Girls Out West which is on the other end of the spectrum. Some of the scenes here are outstanding. It does seem to matter who the models are. Which offers some inconsistency, but the production is highly consistent. I would like to see more action letting the women work within the scene without so much direction.
From an objective view there isn't much wrong. They list 1,000 models, but it looks like more than that to me as one page says, "Our latest 1,000 models". They have a little of everything too. See a short list of what all different actions they have in their scenes.
374 scenes with 69.
298 scenes with at least 3 girls.
57 scenes with fisting.
95 scenes with tribbing (I don't agree with their number on that one, it seems much higher)
74 scenes with strap-on dildos.
The video quality is very good, they have 1080p downloads available on some scenes from 2004 and 2005. Starting in 2006-07, all videos have 1080p and for the last year or two they added 4K. Many attractive models, high quality video downloads, photos for the photo lovers and still updating during the Covid-19 pandemic. I think the only real faults with it are if you're into amateur action, scenes that make you believe the actresses are into it the lesbian sex, or if you want any kind of story or setup, you may be a little disappointed. The site does do an excellent job of capturing the action on camera (professional) and showcases the models' bodies. |
|
09-08-20 10:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
198
|
Sensual Girl
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Four excellent sites with great looking models
No mention of any download limits and I did not encounter any
Oldje is worth the price. The other sites are all good bonuses.
Navigation is easy to work with even when switching from site to site.
Has a little of something for everyone including picture fans. |
| Cons: |
Some of the sites are not updating
Prechecked cross sale when you sign up |
| Bottom Line: |
The site I was most interested in and signed up for was Oldje. I was a member here years ago and had an idea of what to expect-extremely high quality scenes featuring older men paired with much, much younger women. The site takes the idea to an extreme as the guys are as old as possible, given the natural limitations of age. Some of the men are very gentlemanly and distinguished. I would love that as it is a fantasy of mine. Some of the men are not attractive at all and I am still fascinated that the sex with them is so hot. The contrast makes the scene. How could that ugly wrinkled guy have sex with such a great looking teen? The women are as young as possible, with many in the range of 18 and 19. Many of them are advertised as in their first porn scene. The most unlikely fantasy stories are brought to life and this is one of my all time favorite sites. As of right now, there are over 800 scenes, which is quite a lot for any specialized site. The most recent videos are available in 4K. I am sure it is still updating, but the dates are not listed. This site alone is worth the cost of joining the network.
Class Threesome is what you might expect from the name. However it is two women with one guy and not two men with one woman. Sometimes there are more than two women and those scenes are even hotter. What you get is fun, with the fantasy enhanced as many scenes are playful and the women are extremely pretty. Like Oldje, the pairings are not always believable, but they are always striking. There are only 80 scenes and I don’t think it is still actively updating as the number of videos has gone down since the TBP review in 2013. The scenes are not dated, there are no tags for searching and the site does not tell you the model’s names.
Class Blow Job is a site with 137 videos with a focus on pretty very young women going down on some very lucky and a little older men. I have seen many comparable sites, but this one works well for me as the men are not the focus. You don’t see their faces much and the women seem to get a lot of pleasure in the action. I can identify with the models as the guys are objects of desire for the women to act out oral fantasies. I loved the high level of ball play for example. There are many exciting cum shots that I watched again and again. I don’t think the site is updating as there are no videos in Full HD or 4K, only HD.
The last and fourth site is Class Nudes, a photo site that has some videos of the photo shoots. The photos are not all that explicit, but a nice plus is that many of the models on the other sites within the network are here. They seem to me to be like what an art class would do for homework, using a camera. Most of the photos remind me of what I would expect in a model’s portfolio. Many are of the models faces and many are of them clothed. There are 444 photo updates with over 100 photos in most sets. Honestly I did not spend a lot of time on the site as I do not care for photos all that much. I think the site is still updating, but there are no dates for the photosets.
I think that all the models are Eastern European. If you love blondes, this is like you died and went to blonde heaven. Oldje has dialog in English. On the other sites, there is none, as long as you don’t count a few grunts and groans. Oldje has a tag system for searching and uses 88 tags. They are helpful, but a bit more than most sites. While I am at it, what is the difference between old-and-young and old-young? You get different results. The other three sites need a way to search as there are no tags. Maybe you want to watch only scenes or look at photosets with blondes as an example.
The beauty of the models makes this network the high quality that it is. The sex scenes are not the most extreme you can find, but instead the appeal is to a large audience of us who like to see fantasy. I think couples can watch these scenes together. There is a lot for both men and women to like. |
|
02-05-22 11:16am
Replies (0)
|
Review
199
|
Shady Spa
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A slightly different take on handjobs, blowjobs and teasing/edging.
42 scenes, but includes access to the 10 site Tug Pass network.
Variation of model types and looks.
1080p quality downloads on all 42 scenes.
Currently updating, but not much consistency to the updates. |
| Cons: |
The consistency in updates, 2 new updates in January, 4 in February, 3 in March, 2 in April, 1 so far in May.
Unless I am missing something you can only download the videos in 1080p. I first thought it was streaming only, but realized to right click and save as.
I love variation in model looks and body types, but I don’t think everyone will have the same appreciation I do for the variation.
Scenes are short |
| Bottom Line: |
The biggest reason I joined this network was I saw where they added a new site called Edge Queens. Women edging men is maybe my favorite niche in porn and it’s hard to find it unless you go to the sites that you have to pay per scene.
Shady Spa is a newer site too. The scenes are set in a spa or massage parlor type setting. One of the 42 scenes has 2 women, the other 41 only have one woman. The oldest scenes feature models wearing germ masks, I assume those were recorded when Covid first started up. The scenes are more straightforward than I expected. There’s a very short massage at the beginning of most scenes. Which to me is the most important part of these scenes. It’s trying to separate itself from every other handjob site. While the short massage is disappointing, the scenes don’t even really try to convince you they are anything other than a handjob scene or even a porn scene. The masseuse walks in while the man lays on the massage table, almost nude, or at most dressed provocatively. When I watch a porn scene with a theme, I want to believe the theme even if it’s outrageous and unbelievable. A masseuse walking in with a string bikini, pubic hair showing, nipples showing, does not make me think this is a “spa”. Even the dialogue works against the site’s theme and it’s because of how the masseuse is dressed or not dressed. A female masseuse walks in with pubic hair showing, nipples fully exposed and says, “Do you have any problem areas you need me to work on?” I want the male to say, “Well yes, I am here for a massage, put some clothes on.” If you are going to need some inkling of believability this site isn’t going to do much for you.
The model variation is good. There are some that look very young (18-22), some that look as old as maybe 40. There are very slim models, more average size and some that are on the larger side of average-sized. There is a good mix of races. Of the 42 scenes, I am playing a guessing game on a couple of these, at least 12 of the 42 scenes have women who look black, biracial, Latina or Asian.
I do like that there are more than just handjobs. Some of the scenes are as much blowjob as handjob. There is teasing. What I would describe as close to edging. The older models seem better at making the scenes more in-depth. The one scene with two women is probably the best scene on the site and should be something they consider doing more often.
The looks of the models is something I rarely criticize and I won’t on this site either, but I will say with a lot of these “models” their reactions and what seems to be genuine enjoyment, even arousal, tops their looks. Which could be a good thing since looks are subjective. I would think you could stick a perfect 10 model in these types of scenes, but if she’s not really into it, her looks wouldn’t save the scene. These women in these scenes are also clearly not actors. I have to think their enjoyment is genuine and that helps a lot.
I don’t think any of these models are professional models. I just wish there was more to the scenes. The scenes only average about 12 minutes. That includes the 1-2 minute massage at the beginning. It kind of feels like the guy is paying for a handjob/blowjob and the woman isn’t there to make a porn scene. She’s there to make him cum and get the scene over with.
I have looked everywhere for other video resolutions and formats, but I don’t believe there are any extra versions. You get 1080p on all 42 scenes and the only other option is to download the around 12 minute scenes in 5 parts. They do have pictures and those can be downloaded. The pictures are mostly of the model posing which you don’t see in the video.
It’s not a bad site, but it could be a lot better than it is. |
|
05-11-21 03:41pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
200
|
She's New
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The 295 models here are supposed to be new to porn.
There are 262 scenes.
Downloadable videos, photos and screencaps.
Biller is Epoch
Videos often are in the hour long range, some are less, even as short as 30 minutes.
Very attractive, young models.
No clear update schedule, but they do update it. So far in January they only have 1 update, in December they had 5, in November they had 1. It at least has a decent sized archive of videos to hold you over for new releases. |
| Cons: |
I think the basis of the site might be a con. It says Only First Timers on each scene, maybe it means it’s their first-time filming with them? I have seen several of the models before.
There’s not much story or even purpose other than it’s supposed to be the models first scene. It’s very formulaic. The sex isn’t bad, and the attractiveness of the models makes the story less important. It’s kind of like watching casting porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site’s popularity has to be because of the looks of the models. They’re all comfortably in the 18-22 range, most are thin, but there are a few bustier ones. The finger in the mouth, “I’m innocent” look is common here. The models are more likely to catch your eye than the plots. Most of the scenes start like a casting type scene. The model talks and answers questions for about 7-12 minutes, she then strips and teases for 5-8 minutes, then the sex starts, and it becomes very formulaic from there. I’m not familiar with some of these models, but there are at least half of them that I have seen on other sites.
The download options are easy to use, and all scenes have 1080p, 720p, 576p, 480p and mobile options. You can download the photo sets and if you like, you can download the screenshots too.
There’s come credit due on the interview portions of the videos. The models do a good job of playing innocent, excited, anxious and often give quick upskirts or upshort views. They have playful attitudes towards the questions, and I found myself enjoying these interviews as much as the formulaic sex.
Beyond that, I didn’t like this site as much as I thought I would. Maybe I’m just burning out on the casting style sites? It’s definitely not the fault of the models. There are some really cute and really pretty models here. It’s just a style a porn I think we’ve been overloaded with. How many more models are going to be shocked to see an 8” dick? |
|
01-27-20 08:26pm
Replies (0)
|
|
