That's what I have noticed when looking at the previews for the site. I have had a membership to the PornPros site previously, and I saw that this site had came out and was being promoted by PornPros as a "new" thing. It just looks like a conglomerate of different sites. I don't necessarily think that is a bad thing, but if it is coming out as being billed as "exclusive" and "new" then that is incredibly misleading.
I have had the thought that it would be nice to have a "one-stop shop" site to get everything, but I don't think this is what I would consider it to be.
It is incredibly dissatisfying to get signed up for a site based on the previews and how well done they do with "getting you through the door" only to find out that the site is basically a composite of multiple other sites with little to no originals. I'm starting to see this trend with a couple of other sites, and the ads that are sent via email or in banners from other sites that are pushing this almost dances on the line of scam. I don't know what is worse, signing up for sites that don't create anything new or sites that make you pay for downloads...
Seems like it. They have maintained their brand and style of videos, but I'm still not liking the extra fees tagged to downloads which was something that came with a membership before the takeover.
I had my download privileges removed when that happened and they didn't grandfather members in or reinstate them. That was something that was just taken away.
Good review! And nice to see you back again. JOI sites aren't exactly in my catalogue of things to go to, but your review does give me a slight pique in interest. So, thanks for that! lol
Always enjoy reading your reviews; keep it up! (Metaphorically speaking)
This site quickly became one of my favorites. Although, I do have my reservations about them being a part of the Mind Geek group of sites. I don't want to say that the quality will slip because of this transition, but it's hard to ignore based on what I have seen from the other sites in the group. I know that I also may be alone in this opinion, but it's just that, an opinion.
I see that they have added a new site since the last time I had a membership. Did they include that site in the package on sign-up or is it still the same 4 sites with the membership with really only 2 of the 4 still updating?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Amount of content
Video quality; newer vids are available in 4k, but oldies (but goodies) are available at a much lower quality with varied frame qualities that make them seem "enhanced"
Photo sets, however it is only really the newer ones that have extended sets than the earlier releases with less than 100 pics
No download limits
Cons:
BTS Vids are just interviews of the models on their "DVD Releases"
Bottom Line:
If you have been a member before, you do get offers via email often about returns to memberships at $60/year. Which, in my opinion, is a great deal and is a mark that I often look for when searching for memberships to other sites. But with some searching, for new members, you can find the same deals. If you can find it, take it.
Compared to other sites, there is a vast library to explore. The newer videos, as of the past few years, have dove straight into the "step-family" genre and hasn't really given that up. Now, are there other types, yes, like "meet ups" and cuckolding, but the step-family idea has been the predominate genre for a few years now.
It would be hard not to find a popular model on here, so if there is one that you like, chances are they have done one or two scenes for them. You also have a good chance to find some models that are brand new to the industry. New Sensations has a good history with grabbing those who are new to the industry and feature them.
One thing that I do want to note, the zip files for the photos are large. The resolution is great, but as mentioned, they will take up space. Much like the video sizes, there really isn't anything that is small. You cannot download videos that have a resolution less than 720p. Is that a bad thing? No, not really, but it should be noted if you are the type, like myself, that likes to download and keep a library.
Overall, I would say that New Sensations is a site worth signing up for with a yearly subscription. Although new scenes are only released to 3-4 new ones per week with, now some compilations, it is worth the price point of $60/year if you can find that offer on hand through trusted discount sites or through emails from other subscriptions.
That could be a possibility. I only said that based off of some of the model posts I have seen in the past month with Anal Only twitter handle tagged. And those are some new models that are barely in the industry for a year. So, it's a maybe, but knowing that they still have not taken down that notice I have seen myself when it first went up, then I would say it is leaning towards doubtful.
Like you, I do wish that they start to have regular updates again, but I'm not holding my breath since they are just reposting scenes across all platforms.
It has been a few months since the last time I was a member to any of the sites on the "network," but it looked like all of them with the exception to Dirty Auditions were putting a hold on updating with an undetermined date of return. However, based on some of the posts I have seen on Twitter, it does look like they are shooting again. I have no idea when consistent updates will resume. I want to say this site was one of them, but since they have 3 sites that are similar, it is hard to say which one will resume updating.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
***Part of the Nubiles network
**Cinematography is some of the best available, and the photography is an added bonus to help with the scene
*The network often provides opportunities to join at a discounted rate
*Site navigation is easy
*The best MILFs in porn in scenes that feature mostly one-on-one and FFM; a smattering of FFMM and FFFM scenes
Cons:
***Watch your checkmarks at sign up, and understand what the sales entail
**Even though they are a part of the Nubiles network and will net you other subsites, for some reason the network has Mom Lover, NF Busty, Bratty Sis, and Nubile Films on completely different “network” and require separate charges if you want the complete set.
*Not the best in scene scripting, but this is reaching for 3rd point of a con
Bottom Line:
I have done MILF sites before, and I have a thing for what some may consider as “older women,” whereas in my case same aged women and others still younger women who could be moms. However you want to frame it, Moms Teach Sex placed, typically, stepmoms teaching sex to step sons or daughters with their boy/girlfriends. With how the landscape of porn is anymore, this is a very dark shade of grey from the former “sex pro teacher” angle from yester-year. Either way, it gets the job done in presenting awkward situations with “teens who do it vanilla” and need some “help from the experienced stepmom.” For me, the biggest draw would come from Lexi Luna since she is featured in 7 films on the site.
To note, the first scenes for the site dropped in October 2013 and has been updating somewhat consistently since. For the most part, updates for the site have been coming out twice monthly. With the number of sites that are on the network, it is a little surprising that more updates on a consistent basis have not been a thing since there are days in a week where there are no new scenes released across the whole site. This is a shame in my honest opinion, but perhaps all great things take time. At the time of writing this review, there are about 180 scenes released over the course of 9 years.
Videos:
This is simply a summary of what to expect with the newer scenes, the older scenes, naturally, won’t have the same standards as today’s. Members can expect unlimited downloads, and, if there’s enough time and you know what you want, members can complete their collection in a day.
Resolution:
3840 x 2160 4K video, 1920 x 1080 HD, 1280 x 720 HD, 960 x 540 Web, 640 x 360, and 480 x 270; All videos are set at around 30 FPS
Photo Sets:
There are three options to choose from when downloading photo sets:
Large - 6720 x 4480 pixels
Medium - 2000 x 1333 pixels
Small - 1200 x 800 pixels
All images are set at 120 pixels per inch.
Under normal circumstances for membership options, 30 day, 90 day, and 1 year options are available for users to choose from. Normally, they go for $29.98, $59.94, and $199 respectively. However, as mentioned above, they often run sales or specials, definitely so during holidays. It is not difficult to find discounts that can bag you a monthly membership of less than $10 with a recurring rate of around $15 from my experience with the site. I have played with the idea of just going with the yearly membership, but knowing that there are unlimited downloads and some of the fastest download rates, it makes it difficult to want to commit for more than 3 months at a time for collection updating purposes. CCBill has always been the biller for all the times that I have joined the family of sites, and they have been easy to work with when it comes to sign ups and cancellations.
Recommendation:
I would recommend the network first, the site second. If I had to solely recommend the site, it would be a maybe. Depending on your tastes, maybe the idea of MILFs/Stepmoms having sexual exploits with their step sons or daughters with their plus ones is enough. The somewhat comical scripting might be a draw for some, the sex for others, and/or the cinematography for the rest. If you are the type that needs to have something more and need more substance to your porn to help with your fantasy, then I would say that this site might be on shaky ground with you based on the naïvety of the younger models around the experienced MILF. There are some sites out there that do those aspects better, with the exception of the filming and photographs. In my opinion, and sure there will be some disagreements, it is some of the best out there for this genre. The quality of both may not be top tier, Triple-A quality, but how it is done, with the lighting and positioning rivals and surpasses most.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
***Content, content, content… It’s very overwhelming at first glance at the number of videos that are available to you on first look of the site.
**Features the best stars in the industry from across the world.
*Video and photo quality is decent for what you may need or to satisfy your itch for many, many months plus the number of niche categories that are available for a viewer to search for.
Cons:
***The ticket based system that is available is a joke. The amount of money they are charging and/or the wait you need to do in order to acquire tickets. How about have those sites as separate entities instead of gouging.
**500 downloads per month limit… Sort of…
*The number of doubled scenes that need to be sifted through just to get the one that you have actual access to.
Bottom Line:
Intro:
What used to be known as DDF Network is now Porn World. When you sign up, it then transfers everything over to Porn Box. Not confusing at all. There is a ticket system that is involved, however, that is to access other scenes within the “network” of sites that include Anal Vids, Legal Porno, Bang Bros., etc. It should be noted that some scenes on those sites do find their way into Porn World, and at the very least the screenshot thumbnails of the videos do make that apparent. As a member, you are allotted a number of tickets per month without needing to make a separate purchase to acquire tickets. But, if you just cannot wait, purchasing ticket bundles is an option. There are 100+ studios associated with the network, however, not all are included with the initial membership and tickets will be needed to access those studios.
The photo quality:
Image size, in the gallery photos and not screen caps, that is seen mostly in the newer scenes is at 2592 × 1728 with 96 pixels per inch. The older scenes have pictures sizes at 2592 × 1689 with 72 pixels per inch.
The video quality:
Available downloads are in as follows and where available:
“WEB” - 640 x 480
“VGA” - 960 x 540
HD or 720p - 1280 x 720
1080p - 1920 x 1080
4K - 4096 x 2160
(Some videos will be at 60 fps, but most are at 30 fps.)
Also, video trailers can be downloaded. Some videos have “Behind the Scenes” videos available are are marked on the thumbs with 4K and Closed Captioning tags. The BTS scenes that are available are, what I feel are, true BTS scenes that show more of the directing aspect rather than the “silly off camera” stuff that can be seen on sites like Bang Bros and Vixen.
Pricing:
Month-to-month can run you around $30/mo. 2 month subscription is at $55 and 3 months runs at $80. As far as I can see, there wasn’t anything I saw that was for 6 or 12 months like most sites, but this could be an oversight.
Ticket packages that are available run from 10 tickets for $13, 20 for $24, 30 for $38, 50 for $60, 100 for $100, and 250 for $220. If you do the math on the ticket packages, it doesn’t really make much sense and you don’t see an actual benefit from making these purchases unless you want to go all in at $220 which equates to about $0.88 per ticket.
Studio subscriptions are available at $30 for Bang Bros. Box, Porn World Box, and Private Box. These subs come with the notice of purchase saying that if you have used tickets to purchases any scenes under any of those subscriptions can be refunded to your account.
Not every studio has the aforementioned monthly subscription offer. They do provide a total amount of value of tickets needed to purchase in order collect all scenes under that studio if they do not have a subscription offer. Example of this would be Giorgio’s Lab is valued as $2700 for the complete library currently.
The other stuff:
One thing that seems a bit odd to me was the download limit. From other sites, they all mentioned not having a limit on downloads. I am here to tell you that there is. Around 500 for the month is the limit. Yes. 500 per month. That works out to about 16 downloads per day and 125 per week. Not that bad for sites that set limits like that, however, I think it would have been better served to set a limit per week or day instead of month. If you are willing to put in the time on it, that limit can be reached in a day. The nice thing, like the majority of sites, you can still stream unlimited.
Recommendation:
The scenes are varied and plentiful, so there shouldn’t be any worry about not being able to find content that suits you for that day. It is overwhelming to see how much there is. I’m not sure if there’s anyone that would have enough time to watch half of the scenes available on the initial membership. Since there is so much, you will find your fair share of duds and overall flat scenes that just don’t do a thing for anyone on all fronts. There are a handful of scenes, mainly of models that I looked for, that were well represented and done well enough to be satisfying to watch, and even fewer that I see myself going back to over and over. One thing that I wish there was more of is the sensual stuff. Being that the site doesn’t really touch on the softer and more intimate side of sex drops the rating for me, but one thing is for sure is that the porn here goes hard and that is enjoyable to view as well.
Thanks for the insight! It is something that I have been mulling about in my list of choices. A yearly subscription would be the most logical choice knowing how vast the library is.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
***Some of the hottest models in the industry
**Video quality
*Site navigation is done with relative ease
Cons:
***No HQ pics, only screencaps
**Search features are pretty much nonexistent
*Not exactly what you could say varied in presentation
Bottom Line:
Overall, this is what I will say about Nympho: Cut and paste.
What I mean by the first line is that there isn't much variety in what you get from scene-to-scene. They have the same basic formula on how the scenes materialize and progress. Are they exactly the same? No, that's not at all what I am saying, but just be prepared to have those deja vu hee-bee-jee-bees when perusing scenes throughout the site.
Members can expect high quality videos with overly ambitious attempts at glorifying screencaptured photo sets. The latter is a major "no" for me. With how the models are prepped and dressed, I had expected better with hi-fidelity photosets worthy of adding to that photo gallery on Photos ready to be displayed on your TV. But no, I was left with feelings of despair and what could have been as I stared with disscontempt and disbelief.
This may be due to owning an older computer, but navigating from page to page trying to find scenes to enjoy wasn't exactly expedited in a way that would have catered to maximum enjoyment. But once things finally got going, members have approximately 230 scenes to choose from with an average of 995 "pictures" per set.
Knowing that how the scenes have a tendency to manifest themselves, and a group of sites that are overly eager to exploit the anal genre, I'm not sure if there's much motivation to venture into the partnering sites of All Anal, Anal Only, and True Anal. The reason I chose this over the others was due to the fact of not having being beat across the head with anal scenes. It's not a knock on the genre, but being overdone can be tiresome.
One thing is for sure, the site is raunchy and can access the deepest inner pervert in all of us. To that, I will give the site credit for doing right. Not exactly the most enticing review I have written, but I personally don't see much potential beyond this point for the site.
I have not yet tried Adult Time network yet. Knowing how large of a collection of studios it is, the task of just simply browsing a couple of sites is a bit daunting to me, if I'm honest.
If anything, I think, from the clips I have seen, Joymii and 21 Naturals stand out to me. I'm sure there are more within the umbrella's shadow, and I'm also sure that you can inform me thusly as well!
I completely understand you on this one. Speaking for myself, review sites are handy when making choices on what sites might be of some value to me, however, I feel like having actual planned and written reviews from the Average Joe carries more weight in my choice making. And I don't mean the typical pedestrian comments of, "The site is good and lots of models, 5 stars," or "Had a bad experience" with not further explanation.
I do wish there was more active users on here, or at least more participation on the communication between users to help with building a positive community. Seems there are quite a few one-way streets running around.
As much as I feel as though that particular niche is over done and is quickly becoming over saturated with every major pay site doing those types of scenes, I agree with you on NS doing it better. Where we may differ in opinion is that compared to a site like TS, I feel as those NP does it a little better. The writing is a little laughable, but the choreography and cinematography is better, IMHO.
I won't be holding my breath, if I'm completely honest, but I will be on the lookout for some of those "classic" scenes. There are two in particular that I would like to have back: the shower scene with Lichelle Marie, and "The Return of the Mooch" with Topanga Fox. They aren't exactly "new" scenes by any stretch of the imagination, but they are rememberable for me and would like to have back.
To piggyback on Pinkerton's response, I submitted one yesterday. Please let me know if there's something that I have missed or need to change if it does not qualify!
I'm glad at least one person agrees with me on the pictorials. lol
Looks like they compressed the files down by 50%? But that won't be the same for all files, so let's say the compression range is 45% to 55%? How is the quality? Is there that much of a difference? Same? Can you see a frame rate change? Coloring?
I will say from my own preferences for the older models, Lichelle Marie is one of mine. There are 3 scenes missing from her. Topanga Fox has a scene missing, and from the newer side of things Athena Palomino has one that is missing.
KayTBuffs, thank you for your review and insights.
Just from my brief look at the site, I can understand you statement regarding the models. I can see where the "attractiveness" may draw some in and others away. However, I will say that there should be a handful of niche sites like this and have more of a presence in the industry to help promote more positive body and sex image. I think sites like this will help people who tilt towards the negative side to change their views and help with their self image and attitudes towards sex and porn in general.
The goofy stuff they seem to have in spades, quite frankly.
Certainly nothing bad about having that characteristic in their videos. One thing that had been a displeasing item for me is the lack of care and the decline in their photosets. That was one aspect that helped enhance the scenes for me, but that has been on a slippery, downhill slop for the past few years in my opinion. There have been a handful of sites that are on this trend which is disappointing in my view.
I hope that I am not alone in this thought, but I probably am in the minority on this one.
With the file size changes, is this to all videos or just the new ones? Have there been even more scenes that have mysteriously disappeared due to this?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
With my pros, they are not going to vary much from the previous review I had written on MYLF. Granted that it was a review of the overall site, but it will not vary much being that this site is included in the membership.
Cons:
The cons, again, will be the same as the previous statement for my pros. So, if you have not read the pros part of this or my previous review of MYLF, please refer to those first.
Bottom Line:
To start, my initial review of MYLF was based on the information and my experience with the site, therefore some of the statements I had made could have been misstated or missing information compared to my current understanding, however still mostly accurate from my perspective.
Turns out that in order to have video downloads, you need to sign up for a multi-month subscription. This idea of having that feature makes complete sense now and other pay sites should take after this model. There are a handful of sites out there that charge extra on top of the multi-month payment for any sort of downloading which is absurd in my opinion. Getting users to sign up for more than one month to have downloading is a good step and does alienate former users looking for "updates" to their collections.
The focus of this review will mostly be about the content that currently exists on MYLF Body. Here's the basics:
There are currently 74 movies at the time of this review with about one update per week to this site. Photosets aren't exactly the most comprehensive, which is a current trend across the site and TeamSkeet in general. With that said, expect the majority of scenes to not have over 200 pictures per set. Streaming, for me, works great at 720p, but I have an older computer, but expect options up to 1080p. There are videos that can be downloaded at 4K as well.
The content you find in the site follow this general storyline. Female model in the MILF category is working out or at least doing something that is related to being somewhat remotely "athletic." She either works with, spied upon, or meets up with a male model who is completely mindblown with how amazingly fit the MILF is.
Now, the setting of the scene varies, but expect them to take place in either an outdoor, gym, home gym, or the rare occasion bedroom settings. They feature the MILF doing some workouts or giving instructions to the male talent for workouts.
What is missing? Some lesbian scenes and group action! The site is completely dominated by one-on-one situations, and some variety wouldn't hurt the site in any way.
Would I suggest this site? Absolutely. The set up is great with the physical activities leading into more erotic physical activities. And lets face it, we've all fantasized about meeting someone in the gym and just connecting in such a way that you two are meeting up in the locker room or wherever. Aside from what I had stated from what is missing, overall the site is good and I would recommend it, however, adding some variety would help the site and add more variety to "workout situations" to enhance and already great fantasy situation.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
