Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ interracial orgy as advertised
+ black guys with big dicks on latina girls as advertised
+ plenty of action, including anal
+ decent quality pictures
+ lots of bonus sites (FilthFreaks network)
Cons:
----- most episodes are incomplete (see explanation below)
-- only 400x300 video clips
-- PRE_CHECKED cross-sales when purchasing
- cross-sales within member area
-- supposedly no updates
Bottom Line:
After pretty good experience with FilthFreak's BubbleButtOrgy, I've decided to try another their site Orgyental, and was fased with a MAJOR disappointment. While all parameters of Orgyental are about the same as BubbleButtOrgy, and it should have ended up with a similar rating, there is one HUGE thing which is different between these 2 sites, and it is that Orgyental just doesn't work properly.
Like BubbleButtOrgy, Orgyental is about multi-guy multi-girl orgy, the difference is that for Orgyental girls are latina (and the guys are still black). Like BubbleButtOrgy, Orgyental has some introductory stuff which makes things more interesting. Like BubbleButtOrgy, Orgyental starts mildly and then goes to all-out orgy.
But here is where the difference kicks in. While Orgyental has 24 episodes, and it looks that every episode was intended to consist of 15-20 5-minute clips, on site there are only 2 (or so) full episodes, and the rest just abruptly ends after 5-7 clips, leaving the best part out. Most likely it is just a technical oversight, but as a user I don't really care.
Bottom line: if it would be a single site, I would say it is outright rip-off, but as it is a part of the network, I won't be that harsh. On the other hand, such sites make me frustrated, which definitely affects overall feeling about the whole network (which BTW wasn't that high from the very beginning).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ VERY unique idea
++ supposedly amateur girls sucking male strippers in the heat of the party
++ maybe (probably?) there are even REAL amateurs there.
++ action is very hot for supposedly amateur party: stripping, sucking, and up to full sex.
+ decent video quality
+ other OrgyMax sites included
Cons:
-- it unclear how much of the action is staged and how much is "real"
- there are no clear markings when one party ends and another starts; took some time to figure it out.
- price
Bottom Line:
When I first got to PartyHardcore member zone, I was seriously disappointed. The first clip I've got was some action without beginning and without end, just "out of blue". It took some time to realize that every scene is actually splitted into 4 parts, and that it is completely up to me to find out where the whole scene begins and where it ends. I don't have problems with splitting 2-hour-long movie into 4 updates, but guys, you could at least make it clear that these 4 updates are a part of one big scene.
But when I've got past this initial disappointment and understood how PartyHardcore organizes content, things went much better. First of all, it is a REALLY original idea, not to be found anywhere else. It shows a all-girl party with a few male strippers thrown in. Quite obviously, it starts with the stripper guy stripping, but it doesn't end there. Some girls (most likely professional adult models) start sucking the stripper guys and even fucking them, but the most exciting part of the whole thing is that supposedly amateur girls join them too. It is impossible to judge if there are real amateur girls participating in hardcore action, but it indeed looks rather genuine.
Technically videos are of about average to good quality: recent "normal" videos are 640x360 @1.1kbit/s, HD videos are 1280x720 @3Mbit/s, though I'd say HD ones are rather blurry for this kind of size. Recent pictures are suprisingly clear, though not too big in size.
Bottom line: despite outrageously high price, content (and idea) is absolutely unique, so if you're bored from "same old, same old" stuff, and are excited about the idea of real amateur girls having sex during real party, you might want to try it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
++ real 3D sex (camera/angles)
++ different sex positions
++ includes solo, boy-girl and even MMF
++ lots of different outfits for the girl
+ skin tones and hair
+ CCBill as processor
Cons:
--- VERY limited action
--- action is too mechanical (just moving back and forth)
-- only one girl
- quality of 3D graphics is not so good compared to others (it's decent but not REALLY good)
- minor flaws in 3D interface (it may leave camera in position when it's difficult to see anything or move it)
Bottom Line:
First of all, a word of warning: this site (play-sex-game.com) has TWO different games and TWO different subscriptions. One is for Flash-game "Sambuka" (I didn't subscribe and cannot comment on it), and another is "Alice 3D", which this review is about.
After VERY poor experience with 3DPlaything (see my review) I didn't give up and continued to look for decent 3D sex games). And while "Alice 3D" by Play-sex-game is similar to 3DPlaything in it's idea, it definitely gives MUCH more than 3DPlaything.
Idea is very simple and as I've said, close to 3DPlaything - you can dress that "Alice 3D" girl the way you want and then put her into different sex positions, sometimes alone, sometimes with a guy or even two. Then you can control movements (actually controlling only the speed of movement, as movements themselves are pre-programmed for each position). And as usual with real 3D, you can control camera angle and zoom easily. Quality of 3D graphics is IMHO not so good compared to 3DPlaything, but it's still not bad.
Bottom line: while it wasn't too entertaining for me (IMHO action was way too mechanical), it can have some value for real fans of 3D virtual sex.
Current price structure:
$24.95 for 10 days (trial) then $9.95 recurring every 30 days (you can unsubscribe anytime)
$29.95 for 60 days (non-recurring)
$34.95 for 365 days (non-recurring)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ DP site
+ group action
+ some girls aren't bad for this kind of action
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- most likely not updated (TBP lists 16+ episodes back in January, now it's 20)
- not much content
- booooring; always two guys and a girl
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
This site belongs to the same network that GangLandVictims I've reviewed a bit earlier, and quite expectedly it shares lots of common things with it. Video and pic quality, lack of updates, annoying login and pretty good navigation are all the same. There is one difference though and it's definitely not in favor of Plug2Holes: it is lack of creativity here. It is ALWAYS 2 guys on 1 girl, so in the very first clip they try everything they can, and all the other clips become BOOOOORING (there is one clip with DAP that adds some twist, but that's about it).
There are about 20 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video. As with GangLandVictims, main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). As with GangLandVictims, all episodes are within theme (every episode has DP, and there is at least one DAP; no DPP was sighted). And also as with GangLandVictims, cameraguy work and lighting are very average, and so is quality of compression; in short - very average site from video quality standpoint.
Bottom line: IMHO not worth the money on it's own; considering the rest of Jerk-Off Pass network, can be not too bad as there are some better sites there.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- videos in iPod format; iPod encoding quality is quite good;
- overall encoding quality is not bad (though in 1500kBit/s it is possible to do much better than 640x360).
- cameraguy work is decent
- quite significant variety of actions (from B/G to group/DP and MILF)
- updates several (5?) times a week
- I like design and navigation (probably they changed it since official TBP review)
Cons:
- iPod movies have no chapters, which makes viewing more difficult; significant minus for iPod-oriented site
- iPod video is only 320x240 (which is not a problem for iPod itself)
- nothing really unique about content on this site; while scenes are (supposedly) exclusive for kickass network, it still doesn't have any kind of action you cannot find elsewhere.
- lighting and post-editing (namely color balance) can be improved
Bottom Line:
This site seems to be 100% clone of kickass.com now.
iPod support does indeed exist (it really plays on iPod), but with 2 drawbacks. One is that videos are available in 320x240 only; while it's not a problem when playing it on iPod itself (it has 320x240 screen anyway), it is a problem for bigger screens such as Apple TV. Second drawback is that clip is not divided into chapters, which makes viewing on iPod more difficult. While both issues would be not too bad for a site that just provides iPod as as one of the options, for iPod-oriented site ithey look as a significant oversight.
Content essentially consists of content of several sites comprising kickass network (such as "10 Man Cum Slam" or "Inseminated by 2 Black Men"), which does provide good variety between these sub-sites, but within each such sub-site most of the videos are of "seen one of them - seen them all" type (except maybe for movies labeled as KickAss - they do have more than one theme behind). Therefore, with more and more regular sites supporting iPod formats, this site is losing uniqueness, quickly becoming 'YAWN' (Yet Another Wanking Network) site.
Bottom line: if you're into iPod porn videos, it's definitely not bad (though lighting and post-editing can be improved); on the other hand, it presents quite standard mix of content, so if you're into some specific niche and want it for iPod, keep looking, as more and more sites seem to add iPod support.
This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Results of reviewing non-member area: according to TBP it is a clone of a well-established site, and looks pretty much like expected for such a site. It has everything needed for this kind of site: ability to search clips, purchases of time from $3.95 to $84.95, streaming/rental/download/XXX-to-Burn and so on.
Bottom line: while I'm not being fan of streaming and DRM, if you're ok with it, can be not too bad (especially considering "XXX to Burn" feature). Chances of being unethical are estimated as "very low".
> Hopefully that happens one day, because that would be
incredibly hot. We can all hope.
Fat chance :-((. The closest thing to "real reality" I've ever seen is on UltimateSurrender and DareRing (on both sites they're hired models but action seems to be unscripted, though in different way), or on NudeInPublic / NudeInPublic.tv (girls are hired models in real environment with onlookers). If you know of any other site which doesn't have scripts, please let me know :-).
> Besides, I am preparing for when the evil people take porn away from
> us, this way I should have enough to last me a very long time! Kinda
> like people stocking up on food and ammo just in case the shit hits the
> fan.
:-) :-).
As I've said, they should allow you to download your 105 movies, but I'm just curious - what are you going to do with all that stuff? 105 movies even if they're 20min each is an awful lot of movies which will take 30-something hours to watch :-).
> it is not my fault if their servers stop the download at 87%!!!
It could be your fault, or your ISP fault, or their servers, or their ISP, or any ISP in between. IMHO it doesn't matter: as they can't be 100% sure it's not their fault, they should allow to resume stopped download not counting it as "full" download.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ several video formats (WMV/Flash/iPod).
+ some videos are HD (up to 1280x720 @4MBit/s)
+ access to the network (though if it's all of the same quality, I'm not sure it's a real '+').
Cons:
--- most likely, at least some videos are not Russian even if advertised as such
-- pre-checked cross-sales
-- not sure if there is at least some genuinely Russian videos
-- according to TBP, only "some" content is exclusive, and it's unclear what part of it is indeed exclusive.
-- at least some girls are of quality which make you think "do I really want to see them in HD?"
- cameraguy work and lighting is VERY
inconsistent (probably due to non-exclusivity)
- site navigation is a mess.
Bottom Line:
RussianTeensClub site was a rather big disappointment to me for a simple reason: it didn't deliver what it promised. When I see site names "Russian Teens Club", I expect to see Russian Teens, not Czech teens, Hungarian teens or Holland teens, but RUSSIAN teens. And when on the very first page of their "Hi-Def Russians" I see the name "Petra Pearl", which is apparently a Hungarian model (see for example here: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/petrapearl.html ), it raises HUGE question about credibility of the whole thing. After this, I've started to look for some conversation within the movies (while I don't know Russian, I can tell a few other languages which are obviously NOT Russian), and surprisingly wasn't able to find ANY dialog or ANY words whatsoever. While normally such videos don't have much words, still occasional "fuck" or something frequently gets in, but in these videos I was NOT able to find ANY such line; were they chosen in this way deliberately (to make sure that customers won't be able to figure out if it's Russian or not) - I don't know.
Technical details about the site aren't bad: WMV in two resolutions (one is 1280x720 @4MBit/s), iPod format, FLash (in decent quality) to view it online. But overall quality of the videos varies from one to another one greatly - it looks that they were shot by completely different teams, and vary from "Very Good" to "Very Poor". The same is true for the girls, and at least SOME of them are of the quality which makes you think "Do I REALLY want to see all that pussies-shaven-a-week-ago and pimples in HD?", though SOME girls are beautiful.
Bottom line: in my book, advertising one thing and selling another one qualifies as SWINDLING, so I can't give the site anywhere high rating. Add to this pre-checked cross-sales (which deducts another 5 points from rating), and you've got the idea why it was rated as low as 60. Moreover, I don't really see anybody who this site can be REALLY attractive for (not for those looking for genuine Russian stuff for sure).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ plot is fun
+ video quality is better than average
+ creativity (different setups and combinations)
+ both screenshots and real pics
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- IMHO it crosses the thin line between "implying sex with legal teens" and "implying sex with underage teens"
- most likely not many updates (as with other sites of the same network)
- could be just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see comments/reviews for DirtyBabysitters
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
This site belongs to the same JerkOff Pass network as DirtyBabysitters and shares a lot of features (not content) with that site (also shares some features with the other sites of the network, but DirtyBabysitters is definitely the closest thing).
Overall, SchoolBusChicks would be about on par with DirtyBabysitters, but there is one thing that annoys me about site's content: IMHO it crosses the thin line between "pretending to show legal teens" and "pretending to show underage teens". I'm quite sure all the models are above 18, but for me even pretending to show underage teens having sex isn't a good thing. That's the reason why Dirtybabysitters got much better rating than SchoolBusChicks (while I can easily imagine college girl doing babysitting, schoolgirls having sex are off-limits for me).
There are 20+ episodes there (each is 20-30 min video), and all seem to be within "schoolbus" theme (with appropriate plot and dialogs). Girls are cute, action is hot, cameraguy work is very good too. Video encoding is typical for the JerkOffPass network (which means "very average").
Bottom line: would be a good site for those who're comfortable with "schoolgirl sex" theme, but I'm not so ok with it. The rest of the network can make it worth the money even without this site.
Ditto to it. Kink.com sites are unusual and might be love-or-hate at least for some people, but they usually provide a VERY good idea about their sites in preview areas. And I can confirm that I had never seen DRM on any kink.com site (hope they still work that way).
Login system has been revamped for all kink.com sites including SexAndSubmission. It was one of the worst in the industry, now it's one of the best (with ability to see all the sites you're subscribed with them together and almost never-expiring sessions). As it was one of the very few complaints about SexAndSubmission, this change has made it significantly better.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- maledom/femsub submission combined with sex (as site name suggests)
- most models (both male and female) really love it;
- variety; new ideas all the time
- ability to leave feedback (and sometimes even get the answer :-); also they're open to users ideas for future shoots)
- ZIPped downloads (ability to download whole episode as a ZIP)
- video/image quality is good
- cameraguy work is excellent
- setups are very good
- navigation is extremely easy and obvious
Cons:
- thrashy billing and authentication system; recurring intermittent problems with logging in
- number of models is rather limited (though models that keep appearing are very good).
Bottom Line:
One of kink.com sites (the same company that is famous for their hogtied.com and fuckingmachines.com sites); lots of models are the same with other kink.com sites, though content is unique (sharing models with other sites of similar niches can be good or bad depending on point of view).
As usual for kink.com sites, most (if not all) of the models are really into it, which (if chemistry of specific models matches) creates very strong feeling of the real Safe Sane Consensual BDSM encounter.
Site has very convenient system of member comments, which helps to create 'community feeling'; also it seems that they do read comments and take them into account.
Bottom line: Highly recommended for lovers of this specific niche (Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM, as opposed to sites simulating rape/violence); definitely best in class.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
