| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Apple's Reply
Maybe it makes sense to leave a comment (but NOT review) titled like "Anybody wants to review this site (membership is FREE)?" - it would allow for unbiased review by somebody from this site (even better - by some known and trusted member of this community). I hope it won't be against PornUsers policies.
|
11-20-07 03:04pm
|
Reply
352
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Reply
I see; it probably means tons of newbie review praising NewbieNudes here. Sigh.
|
11-19-07 02:37am
|
Reply
353
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Apple's Reply
> which occurs to me is an inherent feature of a "review"
Nope :-). There is a subtle difference between "subjective" and "biased". It is like making an experiment in science - measurement errors are inevitable (like subjectiveness in reviews/ratings), bias (both in science and reviews) can and should be avoided.
The other points you're raising can be valid, and I should mention that if original IDoctor's review would be written in these words rather than in original infomercial style, it would probably face less opposition.
|
11-19-07 12:56am
|
Reply
354
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Review
May I ask how are you related to IDoctor99? 2 newbie reviews in single day cannot be a coincidence.
|
11-19-07 12:39am
|
Reply
355
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
> obviously you can't seem to get your mind around the idea.
No, the idea of the site is obvious (there is nothing really new about it BTW), it is you who can't seem to get your mind around the idea of THIS site, and the idea of THIS site is about unbiased reviews. And your so-called review cannot possibly be unbiased because there is your content on the site (moreover, originally you've put your ID in your "review"). You've wrote in one of your replies: "of course I want to promote it to others." - THIS site is NOT about PROMOTING anything; it is about sharing information.
> It is my firm and honest belief that there are few, if any, porn sites offering a better experience on the web for anyone interested in such material.
Even if it is firm and honest, it is biased.
|
11-18-07 02:21pm
|
Reply
356
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
> Whats the problem with finding a good thing and wanting to spread the word?
The problem is with creating your own content and trying to "review" it and put "rating" on it. Comment would be more appropriate for this kind of things (not exactly sure if even it would be ok with the spirit of the site, but in any case it would be better than fake review/rating).
> Can you guys be any more rude to somebody wanting to help out fellow porn watchers?
Sure we can, just ask about it politely enough.
|
11-18-07 01:18pm
|
Reply
357
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
Even if you do not receive any money from the site, you admitted yourself that you want to get more people there; that means that your "review" is biased from the very beginning, and rating you put in you review is completely useless. It MIGHT be suitable as a comment (not sure).
|
11-18-07 12:45pm
|
Reply
358
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
As I understand policy of this site, people affiliated with the site are not allowed to make reviews of the site they're affiliated with, because it cannot be anything but shilling.
|
11-18-07 09:26am
|
Reply
359
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Review
> Leave me a comment and let me know you saw this review!
You're obviously shilling for the site, and this is not welcome here.
|
11-18-07 02:05am
|
Reply
360
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Reply
> ccbill do not want help me ( very dissapointed for them).
Usually they're quite cooperative in cases like this (when it is not content being disputed, but site doesn't provide access). Personally I'd give CCBill another try, making it crystally clear what is the problem.
|
01-16-08 11:16am
|
Reply
361
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
If you paid with a credit card, I would suggest to go to CCBill first and explain situation in detail. If CCBill doesn't help, go to your bank with explanation along the following lines: "this was a payment for subscription service which I paid for a month and access was terminated after 2 days. All my numerous attempts to contact merchant didn't succeed"; as the service wasn't really provided, they should be able to revert original credit card transaction.
|
01-16-08 08:53am
|
Comment
362
|
Nina Wonder
(0)
|
|
05-15-08 06:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
363
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
++ beautiful girls
++ most likely unscripted fight
+ progressive undressing
++ very good video quality (up to Full HD 1920x1080)
++ access to 21sextury network
+ many billing options
+ no pre-checked cross-sales |
| Cons: |
--- pretty much pointless, girls do not know what they're really doing
-- no real rules, no winner or loser |
| Bottom Line: |
When reviewing such a site, it is very difficult to avoid comparing it all the time with UltimateSurrender (which is BTW at the very top of my personal ratings). All the time I was a bit confused: if comparing NudeFightClub to UltimateSurrender, it IMHO doesn't stand a chance, but if comparing it to "average site out there" it isn't too bad.
First of all, NudeFightClub clearly loses to UltimateSurrender in the overall concept. It looks that the authors of NudeFightClub got the main idea of "show how girls fight and then fuck", but didn't make it look anywhere real. Unlike UltimateSurrender, on NudeFightClub there are no rules, no judge, and no real competition. It just shows two girls wandering around the ring and hitting each other without apparent reason. Probably "fight" is not scripted, but as there is no real reasons for girls to fight, it is not really competitive. The "fight" starts with girls dressed, and they undress as the action goes, and in the end girls are usually completely nude. There is no judge, and no score, so in the end, there is no winner or loser, girls just move from nude fighting into some lesbian action.
On the positive side, girls in NudeFightClub are usually very beautiful, so watching them is a pleasure. Video quality is one of the best in the industry (up to 8MBit/s 1920x1080, both in WMV and MP4). Download speeds are good. And last but not least - it provides access to 21Sextury network (and IMHO there are much better sites within 21Sextury than this one).
Bottom line: if you like UltimateSurrender because it is real and competitive - probably you shouldn't bother with NudeFightClub, you're likely to be very disappointed. But if all you want is nude girls wandering around in some sport-like action - it might be worth a try, especially considering bonus access to 21Sextury network. |
|
04-13-11 08:43am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
364
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Reply
> Well, LOL, you are obviously correct.
:-)
> At least I occasionally like the illusion of reality.
Me either, but I prefer "real reality" sites like UltimateSurrender, where it is known that they're models (well, no way around it), but the action is unscripted, or like NudeInPublic, where action is scripted but not completely (at least onlookers aren't scripted). Unfortunately, there are very few decent sites like this (not much besides UltimateSurrender) :-(.
|
11-28-07 06:04am
|
Reply
365
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Comment
Real women? In porn? Are you serious? Professional models in more or less real situations, that's the most we can expect IMHO, and all the b/s from BangBus and other "reality" sites along the lines of "we've met this girl on street and made her fuck us in 15 minutes" is just as it is - s**t that comes from a bull.
|
11-28-07 01:46am
|
Comment
366
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
|
11-27-07 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
367
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 08:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
368
|
Nude in Public
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ original idea
+ real girls in nude on real streets
+ creativity (different scenarios and setups)
+ frequent updates
+ quite funny stories behind the shootings
+ rather active community |
| Cons: |
- videos are essentially teasers to get you buy full DVDs
- "Latest video update" is a video shot back in 2003
- no full scene videos at all
- almost no translation in videos
- video quality is very questionable (at 600kBit/s it looks like VHS; how do they sell DVDs with such quality?)
- thumbnails are so small that are almost useless
- picture quality is not so good (resolution is up to 1600x1200, but photographer's work is not up to resolution).
- design is a joke |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the idea of the site (real nude girls in real city streets and other real public places), but the site has VERY serious deficiencies. The most annoying thing for me was the fact that they're selling the same content twice (charging for it twice). When subscribing to the site, they say "220 Video Clips", but once you're inside you find that videos are just "Free bonus", and essentially are just teasers to get you buy full versions at their DVD shop (xxvideo.com, where videos are sold at $35/90-minute DVD + S&H). Yes, there can be about 220 clips inside, but each clip is mere 2 minutes long, they date back to 2003-2004 and are NOT full videos (DVD versions of the same thing are substantially longer), plus quality is questionable by modern standards to say the least (both resolution and cameraguy work are subpar).
As for pictures - the main annoyance is their ultra-small thumbnails, which makes seeing what's going on almost impossible. Also IMHO this kind of content is much less interesting in pictures than in video.
Bottom line:
Adding FULL videos and sorting out thumbnails could make it an excellent site (especially with such creative guys behind), but at current state I don't see much value in it except for the big fans of this very niche (and even for them buying the same but FULL content from xxvideo.com at $35/DVD could be a better choice). |
|
11-20-07 08:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
369
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
> Shame there isn't someone with a website doing that over here, it would be great watching naked girls walk the street.
"Here" - you mean in US? I suspect that with this kind of stuff there can be some legal issues; anyway if any of US/UK webmasters is reading this conversation, please register my vote for it too :-).
|
11-18-07 01:56am
|
Reply
370
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I know, but content (and names) of these 2 sites are THAT similar that I've thought it might be just an overlook (or recent domain name acquisition, or whatever else).
Thanks for the advice anyway :-).
|
11-16-07 08:02am
|
Reply
371
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Thanks. I was wondering because NudeInPublic and NudeInPublic.tv have VERY similar concept; even wondering if one just stole content from another one.
|
11-16-07 07:16am
|
Comment
372
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
|
11-14-07 12:44pm
Replies (6)
|
Comment
373
|
Nude In Public.tv
(0)
|
|
11-26-07 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
374
|
Nude In Public.tv
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique content
+ real nude girls in real streets
+ FULL videos (unlike NudeInPublic)
+ girls are "girl next door" type, but not ugly
+ frequent (but disgustingly small) updates
+ picture quality is decent
+ girl date of birth and shooting place for each shoot are shown |
| Cons: |
- not so good attempt to mimick NudeInPublic
- repetitive (especially compared to NudeInPublic
)
- video quality is mediocre
- micro-updates of 20 pictures a time are disgustingly small
- bigger files hosted by 3rd-party (with separate login/password)
- not that much content |
| Bottom Line: |
After my recent (and not so successful) attempt to join NudeInPublic (.com) - see my review, I've decided to try NudeInPublic.tv . Unfortunately, it turned out to be even bigger disappointment.
It looks that it is an independent attempt to do something similar to NudeInPublic, but unfortunately it has lots of definiencies. The main one is that they lack creativity of NudeInPublic. There are no scenarios and different situations here, just nude girl going through the streets. Everything else isn't that bad,
and (unlike NudeInPublic) these guys don't try to sell the same thing twice, so videos are FULL), but unless some creativity is thrown in, the site doesn't offer much of useful content.
So much for my attempt to find site of this very niche :-(
Bottom line:
comparing them to NudeInPublic isn't that straightforward: these guys do have FULL videos (BIG PLUS), but with much less creativity (BIG MINUS). Overall, if you're a big fun of nude girls walking through crowded streets, I'd still recommend NudeInPublic over NudeInPublic.tv (but read my review of them CAREFULLY - it's not a picnic there too, and I gave them only 68 rating); if you're not a big fan of these things - don't bother. |
|
11-22-07 03:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
375
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Reply
I see, thanks. But in such videos girls don't talk much anyway, do they? And Seventeen has always been an European company, and they had never used US models (originally used Dutch, now East European - what's the big difference?) Or you mean that Dutch models did know English well, and East European don't? - that I can confirm, and that is indeed a problem in Seventeen chatroom, but IMHO not the biggest problem there.
|
11-21-07 06:03am
|
