| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm no longer a member messmer,(although I may come back soon, using my $9.95 link I hope you were able to take advantage of.).Although it does not surprise me at all. Reality Kings to me is the most corporatized of all of the big name North American sites. (Brazzers at least has a forum where complaints are voiced and moderators often give the company's side).
Nonetheless it doesn't bode well when you have so many big names struggling (relates to the forum thread about Scoreland). Then again for a site like Reality Kings it's probably that some girl just missed a shoot and they had to fill in an update from somewhere out of there ass.
|
09-27-10 01:03pm
|
Reply
127
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
You think they are recycling content?
|
09-27-10 10:53am
|
Reply
128
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Your tastes confuse me messmer, you say you prefer niche content, but didn't you have just have a brief subsciption to Bangbros and RK? If those sights aren't mainstream I don't know what is.
My strategy is to spend what I need to get my niche needs met first (hence subscriptions to Foot Fetish Daily, and 50 plus milfs) , and then supplement it with some of the mainstream stuff which can be found much less expensive. For instance I have links for Brazzers, Bangbros and RK each for $9.95, and tend to rotate which ones I subscribe to (Brazzers is constant though). Videobox is my only yearly subscription mainly for the volume it gives access to.
I agree with you that I prefer my niche stuff to mainstream any day, but for me alot of the mainstream stuff is damn good, plus there are many strains of what you might call mainstream. I think you find that when you go only niche, that there are a ton of videos you see on the net that you wish you could download, and I'd say 85-90% of the DVD type content makes it's way to sites like videobox and/or videoz at some point or another.
I take it then that you subscribe to 21sextury for Lusty Grannies, I'm sure you've already thought of this, but wouldn't your money be better spent at a site like Mature.nl? (if it isn't already).
|
09-25-10 05:28pm
|
Reply
129
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes and no, for 99% of sites I agree but sites like this one and Video Box I think are worth it for a year just based on sheer volume. It's like a good fallback site to have in your back pocket.
In fact I actually don't think these sites because of their nature (updating like once every few hours with a new DVD) would really make sense as a monthly subscription.
Now I would say it only makes sense to have one like this, personally I subscribe to Videobox yearly and will probably re-up next year. Too much bang for your buck.
This would make a good thread for the forum
|
09-24-10 02:23pm
|
Reply
130
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Just now read your message. Only thing I'd caution you is if you go back to RK and use the link, make sure you are using internet explorer as your browser. I had problems getting the link to work in Firefox.
|
09-23-10 12:31pm
|
Reply
131
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan just do a Google search for Bangbros $9.95, also works for RK, and Brazzers.
|
09-13-10 10:28pm
|
Reply
132
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
You may have to wait for the loyalty bonus, you get more sites the longer you stay a member.
|
08-18-10 12:43pm
|
Reply
133
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I ain't gonna lie it looks damn good, but I'm not really into socks like that. I wish a site like this would launch with a foot fetish focus that would be right up my alley
I like the fact they have North American models, if they had more foot fetish i'd drop my subscription to foot fetish daily (will anyway) and sign up here in a heartbeat despite the lack of an archive for now.
They've got better girls, plus no arbitrary ban on breast implants.
|
08-18-10 12:40pm
|
Reply
134
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
It's a good network, I'm basically off/on again from time to time. Currently I'm on it primarily for nudefightclub and footsiebabes.
|
08-04-10 10:15am
|
Reply
135
|
Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
|
Reply of
vouivre62's Comment
That's a damn shame
|
08-03-10 08:37pm
|
Reply
136
|
Nicoletta Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I could understand this better if there was not both a Mature and Milf designation. In my opinion Milf really should mean 28-35 yrs old, basically motherhood age (at least in the modern era or last 40 yrs).
Mature out to mean anything past 36 yrs old, or beyond normal childbearing age. Now I could see this site being under the Milf category-although I still think she's a bit too young for that-but no way is she mature.
If she's now mature, when was she a "Milf", at 23?
This matters, because when I go searching for new "mature" sites I don't feel like wading through a bunch of 25-26yr olds to get to what I'm looking for.
It's almost like saying a chic like Melissa Midwest is "mature", I'd bet anything she's around the same age by now.
|
07-31-10 10:22pm
|
Reply
137
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
I made a comment about this earlier. You say 6 years behind. You are being far too kind. Take a look at Bangbros, or Brazzers videos from 2004-2005,there is no comparison, the video quality here is stuck at 2002-2003 levels.
I know the site launched in 2004 but they started out as a streaming only site, and therefore I think in order to cater to the online speeds of most people around that time had to downgrade their content. In other words good quality video would have been too much for most people to stream effectively.
They (reluctantly) made the switch to allow downloads only a few years ago. However they have never made anything except for very modest upgrades to the video quality. They also still seem to have that archaic download (with serious difficulties downloading even one video).
Like you said though the actual content is quite hot, these guys actually have a knack for producing compelling videos, especially with their teen sites, but they do a good job across the board in terms of site concepts, direction, camera work, models etc. I even love the hell out of their pic sets.
If these guys had 720hd or even high quality wmv downloads they would be mentioned in the same breath as Brazzers, Bangbros, RK, ect. Yet they refuse to change with the times.
It just makes you kinda scratch your head, because they while keep falling farther and farther behind, they still through out a few updates a month and have been operating this way for a least a couple of years. You'd think they'd just throw in the towel.
My theory is they get a lot of mileage out their excellent photography (although the pics still aren't big enough), which they can still throw up on free tpg sites and get enough guys who don't know any better to sign up for a month.
|
07-31-10 06:38pm
|
Reply
138
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I don't think you'll get anyone that's been a member yet since they just launched this month.
|
07-31-10 06:04pm
|
Reply
139
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I've been a member here many times, last time was early this year. I can't really speak to the negative reviews, but I've never had any problems personally with them.
Also I'm not sure why people have said they are no longer updating, my experience has been they have always updated every day or at least several times a week. They have never hid their update schedules and the dates are openly visible.
Also never had any problems with billing, they've used Epoch for at least the past year who is reputable biller. When I wanted to quit it was just like any other site.
Finally to the poster who mentioned that they get rid of certain sites completely that is a legitimate gripe. Although let's face it these guys basically are about taking chances as far as site concepts are concerned and there should be at least some recognition of that. When you take chances as they have done it's possible that you will sometimes fail miserably as perhaps a site like sleep creep had done.
Porn is a business at the end of the day and perhaps sleep creep had such little interest that it didn't make sense to keep even the archive intact. However it's not like they advertise sleep creep on their front page and when you get in it is not there (at least not when I checked).
I actually still have a link for this site at $9.95 a month to anyone interested (among a few others) send me an email.
|
07-31-10 05:47pm
|
Comment
140
|
Nicoletta Nude
(0)
|
|
07-31-10 05:23pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
141
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Shasta90418's Comment
I have also had major problems with their biller. I also disagree about customer service, my experience has been hit or miss with them.
|
07-21-10 01:29pm
|
Reply
142
|
Black Ice Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
All of the Zero Tolerance sites are high up on my radar as far as new sites to try, I just simply haven't gotten around to it.
|
06-02-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
143
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
This is a good review, you make a lot of good points. However, in comparing Foot Fetish Daily to Hot Legs and Feet, I personally prefer Foot Fetish Daily.
If your were to compare the two sites on paper there is no question Hot Legs and Feet is superior and from that standpoint I see where you are coming from. The models are hotter, more HD, more content overall.
However for me two things, first there is no question that European models are hotter on-the-whole, but I prefer North American models, and finding North American models in high quality Foot Fetish stuff is somewhat rare, even these days. (I mean if you think about it most of the high quality foot related sites are European based.) I like the idea of taking the same girls you see on other more mainstream sites and putting them in foot related scenes.
Second, Foot Fetish Daily just has more personality and fun, it has an informal 'round the house' type feel to it, plus the interaction between the members and webmasters/directors is unparalleled, at least in my experience.
Don't get me wrong, I like Hot Legs and Feet and will probably return to it some time soon, however Foot Fetish Daily for me is a permanent fixture in my porn budget. I came to the conclusion that if I had money for only one site, Foot Fetish Daily would be it.
|
05-30-10 09:41am
|
Reply
144
|
My Deep Dark Secret
(0)
|
Reply of
TangoMike's Comment
Sorry to hear about your experience, but this site is a bad choice to me anyway, it's like a poor man's version of blacksonblondes, and there are even other sites/networks that do a better job or simply have a greater archive.
|
05-29-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
145
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
Karasek's Review
I like the girl, and even kind of like the softcore. Problem is she only goes topless and that's it. Even though I like the model, that's not enough for me.
|
05-29-10 11:02pm
|
Reply
146
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I agree 100% with this review, I also bit on the whole 'combining of both sites' deal. Unfortunately quantity does not outweigh quality when it comes to porn.
The photographers on this site are the worst, they seem to have an obsession with close ups and gynecological lessons. As you say there are some diamonds in the ruff but you have to wade through so many poor and mediocre shoots to get to them.
Sites like allover30 blow auntjudy's away despite having less than half their archive.
|
05-29-10 10:44pm
|
Reply
147
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Facial Abuse.
|
05-21-10 04:30pm
|
Reply
148
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I already took advantage of this deal on another site a while back, I'd say it's worth it. RK's backlog and diversity is more than worth $10 a month. Not my favorite site by any means but certainly worth the price here.
|
05-21-10 04:28pm
|
Reply
149
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I've personally never had a problem with any of the Score sites, and yes I was just recently a member of Score HD. I think the main reason they don't list the billing company on TBP is because they use so many different ones.
For instance, I think I've been a member of Score HD twice, the first time in December it was through Epoch, the second time earlier this year it was through Net billing. I've now canceled Score HD (not because it isn't good). However I still have a running membership to Scoreland which is billed through CCbill (from my checking account)
Score is a pretty reputable company, however you do need to be wary of the cross sells when signing up.
|
04-12-10 06:52pm
|
Comment
150
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
|
03-15-10 01:53pm
Replies (0)
|
