| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Chessie Land
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Yes I've been to this site and it is quite bad. Although it was years ago and at the time the quality wasn't at least acceptable. Chessie considers this site a fraud. She states they ripped her off, leading her to create Chessiemoore.com, a site I haven't been to yet but was considering. Too bad you say it isn't very good.
|
03-27-11 09:27am
|
Reply
102
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Glad to see your pleased. Thanks for the insight
|
03-24-11 12:06pm
|
Reply
103
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I have no problem with it. I strongly believe that there is a large percentage of women who get off on this type of sex. They just won't say so out of fear of being ostracized.
|
03-09-11 12:16pm
|
Reply
104
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
These sites are from the Score Group. I made a thread about their new direction a few months back entitled: "No adult industry in two years" in which their lead editor predicted that piracy would bring an end to the industry ("in two years").
At the time all they were doing was eliminating downloads for their newest "it" model Valery Irene. (Score always has an "it" or "Flagship" model, before her it was Christy Marks, and before that Lindsey Dawn McKenzie) Now it seems they have expanded this approach to some of their websites, although clearly not all of them as I am currently on the last day of a subscription to ScoreHD and they have not yet limited downloads there.
I was actually planning to return to 50plus milfs sometime next month, as I had not really downloaded as much as I wanted to last time. Obviously with this news that is out of the question. They basically just lost a customer. I will consider returning to Exploited Moms instead. Not to mention I know of a free blog where I can obtain most of their back catalog right now. But I was willing to pay.
They are making a big mistake with this as they are destroying any chance at repeat business they might get. I don't think they understand their consumer base. While I understand their concern over piracy, they are clearly not the only ones being hurt by this, none of the other sites have turned on their own customer's in this way.
While they offer unique content overall, and particularly with this site. It is not so unique as justify this, even from a purely business standpoint.
|
03-02-11 11:50am
|
Comment
105
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
|
02-21-11 05:41pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
106
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
It's possible you have some backdoor access (no pun) you aren't aware of. I've had such access to certain sites before where your log in keeps working well after the membership expired.
|
02-18-11 08:07pm
|
Reply
107
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
Oddly enough I'm actually a member of this site (I have a discount link for $14.95 a month). I joined the sister site Club Tug (normal hand job site) and this comes as a bonus.
As far as the fake cum, it's obviously about the fantasy. The network as a whole has a mixture of themes varying from humiliation, young and old (milfs and young guys), cfnm, teens, etc. The enormous cum shots are used as a plot device of sorts and overall I'd say I like it.
The only problem is that all of the early videos (which comprise roughly half the site) not only use fake cum but also have the women stroking what is obviously a fake plastic cock.
I found this to be too outlandish to get into. For that reason, I can only download the more recent vids which have the women stroking a real cock and uses camera angles to create the illusion that all of the cum is coming out of it.
|
12-28-10 05:37pm
|
Reply
108
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes I had seen your BTW.
I'm pretty sure I have navigated from Silverstone DVD to other parts of the network. Since my membership has lapsed I can't verify. However it doesn't really matter. Even if you sign up through White Ghetto or Devils Film. I'm pretty much certain that your username and passcode works for all of them.
When you sign up and log in it should be at the top left hand corner in a drop down, just like all the other sites on the network.
Actually now that I've looked at the tour for some of the other sites, I don't think the network is really advertised on any of them, but they are obviously included.
Trust me of all the sites that would be a standalone, Silverstone DVD is one of last on the list, since their line of DVD's was discontinued many years ago.
|
12-02-10 04:07pm
|
Reply
109
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
As a current member of the site I can say there is a way to sort the models by name alphabetically (I just re-checked).
Anyway as to the substance of your comment, this is definitely not where you'd go for deep throat type material. (I know you said that).
For that I'd suggest Facial Abuse, or checking out some of the older DVD's from Extreme Associates/Armageddon Entertainment called "Slap Happy". (Especially "Slap Happy two" which is a somewhat rare film now). Also "Young Throats".
You may be familiar already with the sites I've just mentioned (and they are pretty extreme) but to be honest I don't think there's much else that I would consider true deep throat.
|
12-02-10 04:02pm
|
Reply
110
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
This site is still part of the network. I was a member up until a few weeks ago. I plan on going back fairly soon.
This network has always been a favorite of mine.
|
12-02-10 03:34pm
|
Reply
111
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I think the name of the site "Only Tease" is meant to be a hint.
I know I'm stating the obvious, but if so, I'm not quite sure what it is your hoping for.
Maybe you should try the other site "Only Opaques". Not sure but maybe that one has full nudity.
|
11-26-10 02:39am
|
Reply
112
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Sorry to hear about the bad experience. I've had some problems in the past with access. (Never been overbilled). I think you ought to call them, there customer service is pretty good and seems to be staffed with North American agents. Most of my issues were quickly resolved after a phone call. Although I do agree they just need to go with CCBill or Epoch. Anyway good luck.
|
11-14-10 07:50pm
|
Reply
113
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I've always felt that Reality Kings had the best pictures amongst the major North American sites. That has changed as anyone who has downloaded recent sets from Brazzers can attest. (Not trying to toot Brazzers horn as I know they are not very popular, but this is the truth).
However they are still very good. Although I don't know the specs.
|
11-14-10 11:51am
|
Reply
114
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I understand Mesmer, I'm not too far away from you in that I actually prefer softcore (although I actually dislike lingerie sets and have a fairly strong foot fetish), especiall when it comes to mature sites. This is why Ive been known to frequent sites like Allover30 and southern charms.
I need to correct my original statement regarding 50plusmilfs as I meant to say it is mostly vids (not pics).
I must say that you must really be desperate for the type of niche you mentioned if subscribed to 50plusmilfs for the interviews,lol! You've expressed this before and I feel kind of bad you've not found that ideal site. (Neither have I in some ways) Although don't sites like Allover30 and Anilos fit the bill to an extent, they are constantly updating?
Anyhow, carry on.
|
11-09-10 02:55pm
|
Reply
115
|
Load My Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Thanks for this review, I've thought about this site for a long time, thought for sure they were no longer updating.
I've always liked Brandon Iron vids, going back to the Extreme Associate days in the 90's. Plus I also have a huge foot fetish, so this sites now on my list. I already have an idea of whats on here from having seen some of the dvd releases.
My question would be, if I pay the $19.99 do I get access to all the vids on loadmymouth? You mentioned something about a tiered membership system or something like that.
|
11-08-10 11:59pm
|
Reply
116
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
First off sorry you were disappointed Messmer. I think the score is a bit low, but can understand your point of view on it.
IMO 40somethingmag has value, but only in the right context. As a standalone sight it is hard to justify the purchase even at $19.99, which is why I'm a member only as a result of the Score Rewards plan that is offered on most of the major Score sites.
Basically if you purchase one site for $19.99 you get to add on a new site each month for the same cost. I have memberships to most of the major Score Group sites using this. And I think they definetely have some pretty good sites on the whole. Sometimes you have to wait to add the site you really want but I won't bore you with the details.
I look at 40something mag kinda like this, they are a hybrid jack of all trades type of site. They do pictures better than a site like Naughty America, in which pics are just an add-on, however they get smoked in the vids department by a site like that.
On the other hand imo they do vids slightly better (primarily due to the lack of HD downloads) than a site like Allover30. At least from the standpoint of hardcore-if that's what your looking for. (While obviously getting smoked in the pics department)
My only issue with your review is that your motivation for joining came from 50plusmilfs which is essentially hardcore only. Yet when judging this site, you didn't like the hardcore focus.
Really, one could argue that based off that you should have given 40somethingmag an even higher score than 50plusmilfs. Since 40somethingmag has both hardcore vids and pictures, while 50 plus milfs is primarily pics.
The one area that the Score Group has made a miserly and imo short-sited decision is to house most of it's HD vids on ScoreHD. HD vids of 40somethingmag exist, but they are all available on ScoreHD along with the HD vids to most all of the ScoreGroup sites. (with exceptions for explicit standalone sites like 50plusmilfs, and ChristyMarks).
I cannot speak to the watermarks. I respect and understand your dislike of them, but I'm sure that for many (like myself) it is a non-issue and mostly a matter of preference/tolerance level.
Anyway sorry for the lengthy comment, and thanks for staying so active on the boards providing users with as much advice as you do!
|
11-08-10 11:45pm
|
Reply
117
|
60 Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I was a member here a while back and will be going back shortly, I think I mentioned it in a couple of forum posts.
These sites from what I understand are the hottest selling for the Score Group right now, which is surprising considering their impressive list of sites.
Basically 60plusmilfs as you say is just a further delineation based on age, mostly all of it's original content taken directly from 50plusmilfs. It was really not needed as a seperate site, essentially done for purposes of marketing, but I think it has worked for them.
Good news considering the announcement on Scoreland that that site may be on the verge of folding.
I had been saying all along (I had a post about a year and a half ago) that this was an underserved market. (North American Models + high quality harcore content)
|
11-07-10 08:58pm
|
Reply
118
|
Stroking Queens
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Seems kinda cheap looking. I'd be wary.
|
10-07-10 08:46pm
|
Reply
119
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Understood. Never been a member at VideosZ.
|
10-07-10 08:37pm
|
Reply
120
|
Where Is Your Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
Chipster's Comment
Was a member here many years ago. Definitely a great site that has always been a bit under the radar, but then again, with most guys into petite teens it will probably stay that way. I actually like the sister site All Kinds of Girls a bit more(its one of the few sites I actually reviewed) but then again I like big girls from time to time.
|
10-06-10 08:58pm
|
Reply
121
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Messmer, am I to understand that you have subscriptions to both Videobox and VideoZ? Isn't that a bit redundant man?
|
10-06-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
122
|
Freaks Of Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Last time I was a member -probably about 5 or 6 months ago-it seemed around once a month. The problem with the site inherently is finding models that fit the description. It's too bad since they have some episodes that are legendary. (Not sure why they haven't brought in Kayla Kleevage since I recently saw her at Naughty America.)
Anyway it's still worth it for the network on the whole and the archive (if you don't already have them all). You can do it on the cheap, just Google: Porn Pros $9.95.
|
10-05-10 11:50am
|
Reply
123
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I think such a pricing model would be dead on arrival. It could only work if:
1. There were no pirating. The only advantage to the current model we have over is going completely pirate bulk and convenience. Individual pricing models takes this away, and forces consumers to constantly be thinking about there wallet-unlike now where it's a one time transaction and enjoy. This would only make the pirates more profitable as some file hosting sites are paying both for uploads and new subscribers. Once the typical pirate/"independent sales partner" were to purchase a movie one time he could still post it on the forums and reap even greater rewards. Plus the average Joe could still find the content via the tube sites.
2. All and I mean basically all the sites agreed on the same model. Otherwise the sites that use the current model would hold the advantage of both bulk and convenience.
Individual pricing models only work for the music industry because of the advent of the ipod, and peoples desire to listen to music 'on the go'. People don't watch porn 'on the go', they do so in front of their computers, or occasionally on their cell phone in a bathroom stall.
This discussion would be better taken back to the forum as it's gotten a bit off the topic of Reality Kings.
|
09-28-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
124
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Messmer do you say that they removed the complaints! I'll probably be back (at the $9.95 price) in a few months, but as I've said, RK to me is the most Corporate and insensitive of them all.
|
09-28-10 11:17am
|
Reply
125
|
Candy Monroe
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Too bad, I still plan on returning here in a couple of months and doing a "power download" of the content I like.
This site even at $29.99 was still too expensive for anything more 'one month every now and then' subscription anyway.
By the way, the $29.99 price also included all 19 sites, although I think they just added the "Watching my Daughter go Black site", so I'm not sure how many that is now. (18,19 or 20)
Nonetheless, too good to stay away, too expensive to stay.
|
09-27-10 10:21pm
|
