I kept running out of characters in the review so I thought I would add this comment to the review.
There's a few confusing parts on the network, though they are easily skipped over so I didn't feel they were problem enough to put in the review. In the "Our Sites" tab of the network there are these listed sites which I can't figure out how to get to:
Inked Babes
Horny MILFs
When I click those sites it just takes me back to the main DDF hub instead of to those sites. I'm guessing the content from those is mixed in the network and they just opted not to list them different than the regular content.
There's also:
DDF Adventures
DDF Cams
The Adventures one looks to be some kind of interactive porn scene site, but I didn't test it out since the url says I'm in the "free" section. I wouldn't have any interest in interactive scenes, but thought I would mention it.
DDF Cams is self-explanatory, but I've never been much for using Cam sites.
Fuck In HD is listed in the TBP review by Maggie as an included site, but my login says it's invalid. Girls in Love also says invalid login. There's also a DDF video on demand site, but I don't have any interest in video on demand.
None of these were off-putting or in the way or trying to get me to click them accidentally. They're at the middle to bottom of the "our sites" page. None of them show up in the drop-down menu from the DDF hub either, but did want to at least say Fuck in HD isn't included in the DDF network since the TBP review has 14 sites included and that's the one not included with my membership. As mine shows 13 sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest and biggest European (mostly) networks on the internet.
- The network has excellent variance in genres.
- Unlike many networks out there, nearly all of these sites were at one time standalone sites that cost upwards of $30 each to join.
- Now officially has 13 sites in the network. Will list each site with newest update in bottom line.
- The majority of scenes across the network come with a photo and video set.
- Over 2,200 models total.
- Well above-average search features including the ability to search within 1 site or 3 sites or how many ever you want.
- Zip files for photo downloads. Seems like forever since I last typed zip files for photos, but it's still a very important part.
- Some of Europe's most popular models have over 100 videos and photo sets here.
- Network as a whole covers solo, lesbian, hardcore, legs and feet fetish, kink/taboo casting clothed/nude and blowjobs/cumshots.
- Archive dates back to 2001.
Cons:
- The older archived content is of lower quality, but I think most would expect that, especially when talking about content from the early 2000s.
- Some of the sites are no longer updating. Will detail that in Bottom Line.
- Network as a whole updates 2-3 times per day. I want to point out here that I don't believe this is a negative, but it is less than DDF used to update and should be mentioned. I'll also give a little more detail into this in the bottom line.
- Minor one here, payment processor was Vendo, who I have limited experience with, but it looks like they have a clear and easy to use cancel system.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying I might be in over my head on this review. The improvements at DDF with search function, finding video quality eras (yes, they have those) and quantity of scenes has been made much easier for us to find and use.
These are the sites that come up in a drop-down menu. I will include their total number of scenes, when the site's last update was and what the update schedule is if still updating, all updates include picture and video set:
1byDay - 4798 scenes, last update was Dec 21, 4 updates per week.
Hot Legs and Feet - 2453 scenes, Dec 19, 3 updates per week. DDF Busty - 1507 scenes, Dec 21, 4 updates per week. Only Blowjob - 1510 scenes, Dec 20, 2 updates per week.
Hands on Hardcore - 1000 scenes, Dec 20, 4 updates per week.
House of Taboo - 953 scenes, Dec 17, 1 update per week.
Euro Girls on Girls - 507 scenes, Dec 20, 2 updates per week. Barely LegalEuro Teen Erotica - 456 scenes, Dec 13, 1 update per week. Eve Angel Official - 336 scenes, no longer updating. Cherry Jul - 108 scenes, no longer updating.
Sandy's Fantasies - 47 scenes, no longer updating. Hairy Twatter - 174 scenes, no longer updating. Sex Video Casting - 846 scenes, no longer updating.
Phew. It's important to note that I was able to find these sites, all content, simply by using the DDF Network hub with a drop-down box for the sites. You can search 1byday, Hands On Hardcore and Hot Legs and Feet, it will just include scenes from those sites. Very good user functions which I mainly stress because DDF's network went through some rough transitions when converting from standalone sites to a network. Those problems are fixed and the network works excellent.
There's also a video era bar across the upper part of the site. It lets you select from DV which are the older videos, HDV which are the in-between 540p to 720p to the Full HD ones. The 720p option starts in 2009, the 1080p starts in 2011.
The thing that has always impressed me about this network is that I used to pay $30 a month for several of these sites and would be excited to get two of them for $45 a month on promos. There's not as many updates as there used to be, but still as a whole, the network has roughly 20 updates per week and all include picture sets and 1080p videos.
I'll also mention that Hairy Twatter and Sex Video Casting just stopped updating a few months ago, so there's lots of HD content on those. The only sites that might not be up to today's standards are the Cherry Jul and Sandy Fantasies sites, but if you're a collector of Euro models, Cherry had a very successful but short run and this content would be great for those who like her. Sandy's Fantasies is of course Sandy from Club Sandy, in her early sets, before becoming Sandy from Club Sandy. Pretty rare content for those who like her.
Then there's my all-time favorite model, Eve Angel, who has a 300+ scene solo site included in this network. Those are mostly 720p or higher so there's no major step-back in quality of those like the other two.
Over on 1byday, the models are back to being some of the most attractive I've seen and they are usually reviving one of my favorite genres, the solo scene complete with eye contact with the camera. It's good to see this style of porn still being made after being overran with hardcore, spitting, slapping, demeaning scenes. Not that those don't exist on this network, both Hands on Hardcore and House of Taboo has plenty of the harder scenes, but there's a certain beauty in seeing a model strip, then masturbate for you the viewer.
I really like the site Barely LegalEuro Teen Erotica which is completely new to me. And if you like amateur or before they were stars, the Sex Video Casting site is full of pretty amateurs, some of which I've never seen on any other sites or in any other scenes. Hands on Hardcore has an interesting twist to it that includes what they call DDF's Guest House, it's once a week and it's a hardcore scene from other sites, including some I've never heard of so you get a chance to sample other sites as well. Aria Giovanni fans should know there's 32 scenes of the ultra-softcore American model on this network. She's softcore in the scenes here, but is a little more risky than she did on her own site.
I really can't say enough good things about this network. It definitely feels like an absence makes the heart grow fonder moment since 3 years have passed since my last membership. The score might seem a little high, but I've gave 1byday, Hot Legs and Feet and Eve Angel Official all 90+ reviews in the past. To get those plus 10 other sites that cover the majority of genres, for under $25 is as good of a value as I'll find. Maybe a little sentimental for me with all these solo scenes of dressed, strip, masturbate, but there's enough hardcore b/g, g/g to make everyone happy.
Change is rarely successful in the porn world, but I see nothing but positive changes here at DDF. Can't do much better than they are doing.
Thanks RA, good to see you still around.
My reviews should be a little more balanced score-wise than they used to be since I really don't have hardly any favorite models anymore.
I do believe the move to quality over quantity is important at this point in these sites lives. When you've got 10+ years of content piling up it's time to start focusing on quality since the quantity should already be there. I'll have a couple of more similar sites to compare over the next few weeks between DDF and 21 Sextury, as both of these once top European networks have both started using different update schedules, higher quality, less quantity practices.
I would think Videobox might still keep me coming back at least once a year to get the Vivid updates, but I ended up with nearly 200 GB more content from VideosZ than Videobox.
I used to be bothered by daily download limits and still am by the more stricter ones like Reality Kings where they cut you off after 50 scenes in one day, but I only hit Reality Kings twice. I hardly ever find enough content, that I want to keep, these days to download more than 25-50 scenes a day, but can understand the frustration for those who are hitting a limit. Thanks for the heads up on the lower resolution. I went through their search engine for an hour or so, counting HD scenes, total scenes, but didn't find anything lower than 540p.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the largest DVD sites on the internet.
- Lots of HD scenes as long as you consider 720p to be HD.
- A few standout studios (Eromaxx, Elegant Angel with standard membership come to mind), you won't find on other DVD sites.
- Though the search engine isn't the best, between it and the tags, categories, it is the easiest of the DVD sites to use and find what you're looking for.
- Good PU member price at $17.99 with no additional charges or add-on channels to buy.
- Lowest quality videos I've found are 540p, nearly 4,000 DVDs, 20,000+ scenes are 720p or 1080p.
- More varied niches that update regularly.
- Download speeds are above average and consistent.
Cons:
- There's not a lot wrong with Videosz, as with any site of this size it can get frustrating trying to find specific niches, but it's still not that bad.
- Older videos highest resolution option is 540p, I'm reaching here since it's expected to see older videos be lower quality.
- Could use a little more "classic" scenes, though my definition of classic is only late 90s, early 2000s.
Bottom Line:
Back several years ago, I posted reviews for both Videobox and Videosz and said I was starting to like Videosz better. Now, it's not even a question. There's niches here that I don't have much interest in, but they should be there. With these DVD sites they should offer as vast of a selection as possible to mimic old video stores.
One of my favorite parts of Videosz are the different studios. Eromaxx currently has 372 DVDs on Videosz, a total of 2,987 scenes. Eromaxx is an excellent studio/standalone fetish network. Being able to get a lot of their content included with your membership to Videosz is a major plus. I've never seen a single scene of theirs on other DVD sites. Elegant Angel, a standalone site and Videobox premium channel that costs $15 to add on VB, is included in your subscription on Videosz. The amount of scenes is pretty similar, VB has 1,644 Elegant Angel scenes, while Videosz has 1,551.
They also have other smaller studios I haven't seen on other DVD sites. The search engine is usable, but I'm not going to say it's 100% accurate. The site as a whole has a nice, clean design with drop-down menus that allows you to separate scenes/DVDs by studio, actress, category/niche. You also won't find perfect tagging or niche-listing, but again, it's not bad.
It's hard to get around making comparisons as to why Videosz has surpassed Videobox, for example, Videobox added tranny/shemale DVDs awhile back, but some members complained so they stopped adding those. Members complained about handjob videos so those slowed. Videosz keeps a more balanced update of genres. I never really understood why a DVD site would limit itself to certain genres based just on the vocal members complaints.
The standout here is Eromaxx's inclusion. They are a pure fetish network that adds a lot of variety to the usual bland world of DVD sites. They are most known for their "public" orgy sites, Party Hardcore, Drunk Sex Orgy, and those are here, but there's also scenes from Fully Clothed Sex, My Fetish and nearly all of the sites included in a Tainster membership.
The overall technical quality is good. They've cut back on daily updates, going from 5 to 3 DVDs, which is normally a bad thing, but of the new updates, roughly 2 out of every 3 are HD quality. It looks like they're trying to add a little more quality over quantity, which I think is a good thing on a DVD site. Based on their numbers they have 3,145 HD DVDs as of 12/14/2015 and those DVDs equal 16,039 HD scenes.
The download speeds reach 90% of my download max speed and it rarely drops. Free Download Manager works, but for whatever reason if you load up a bunch of links, it gives a generic name listing in the download manager's list. Instead of saying "Big Wet Ass scene 1" it will say "video 12" then the next 10 listed will also say "video 12". This can be frustrating if you're downloading a lot of scenes at once since you can't see what you've already put in the list. Once you start the download manager the names change from the generic name to the real name.
I gave up downloading thousands of scenes per month, so I really can't say much about the download limits. I download 25-50 scenes a day, mostly because I've become more selective of what I download.
It's worth mentioning that I noticed a bonus section on their site. It says it's a reward system for loyal customers. It says after 3 successive months as a member you will start receiving bonus access to premium videos from Vivid, Hustler and Club Jenna. Not really for sure how I feel about that since one of their biggest strengths, in my opinion, was keeping their site out of the add-on premium channel mess. I won't change my score for it since it doesn't cost anything to receive those add-ons, but will mention, there are zero Vivid DVDs included with their regular subscription.
Overall, I would say Videosz is the best DVD site on the internet.
That's a funny one. I wasn't caught when I was younger. Didn't have online porn in the 90s or at least I didn't.
And when I did/do get caught now it's intentional. I've found if my girlfriend (old days) or wife (current) are confident and not feeling down about themselves, it seems to really turn them on ... in an aggressive way.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The biggest porn DVD site on the internet and one of the cheapest when joining through Porn Users at $12/month.
- Five full DVD updates per day.
- Their definition of HD includes anything 720p or higher resolution. Based on it, roughly 25% of their DVDs are HD quality.
- What tags they have are actually pretty good
- Premium channels are the big draw for me. Will detail them below in bottom line.
- If you like late 90s, early 2000s porn, a Videobox membership combined with the Vivid channel is probably the best buy in porn.
- Download speeds can vary, but are usually consistent. The variances happen at certain times each day and sometimes it's actually faster, other times way slower.
- My download manager works well (free download manager), but I limit how many files it downloads to 20 at a time so not to risk download links timing-out.
- A generally easy to use site, easy to cancel, unless you do something I do, then canceling can be frustrating. Explanation in bottom line.
Cons:
- Back years ago, I was convinced that VB was steadily trying to improve their site. Not so anymore. I think they have settled into a mass porn site and have no intentions of making themselves any worse or any better.
- Video quality is inconsistent. They'll have a "HD" scene that is 720p with a 1,500 bitrate. While also calling a 720p scene with an 8,000 bitrate "HD". I could just call this being sloppy and careless since it's what it is.
- Pricing is good unless you want the premium channels and join them early in your Videobox membership. See bottom line.
- Loads of newly added DVDs that are full of scenes already on the site under different names. Gives the impression of recycling content, but I think they're just ... sloppy and careless. I have one Eva Angelina scene, four different times and none are the same length. I don't even know who to blame for those, the producers milking a scene or Videobox bloating their numbers.
Bottom Line:
This was at one time one of my favorite sites. I still think it's an excellent site for new members and for those who like that late 90s, early 2000s era porn. Their newer DVDs are good, but the majority fall into the cookie-cutter porn genre, seen one you've seen them all type of porn. That's where the premium channels come in. These are the premium channels with their prices if you add them on the first day of your Videobox subscription: Evil Angel $15 - You can get a full subscription to Evil Angel for the same price using the PU discount, it's a much better deal. Reality Kings $15 - Roughly the same price as you can get from PU, and it's a better deal than the add-on channel.
Kink $35 - Pretty unique channel, it's sort of a best of or compilation of Kink's various sites, it's a great addition, but I hold off until the prorated price brings the cost below $10.
Soft On Demand $35 - Typical Japanese site with mostly censored/blurred pubic areas. It's okay, join it for the last week of your VB subscription if you're interested in Japanese porn. Elegant Angel $15 - It's a good deal if you like Elegant Angel, but I've never joined it.
Club Tranny $15 - Maybe a good buy for those interested in this genre. Vivid $15 - Great add-on, to my knowledge it's the biggest collection of downloadable Vivid DVDs on the internet. Vivid's site didn't have downloads when I was last a member on it (about 9 months ago), so this is a really good deal if you like Vivid.
I admit, I'm a cheapskate when it comes to Videobox. I wait until half of my Videobox subscription is over then join Vivid. This gives you a prorated price of $7.50. I then join Kink when there's less than a week left on my Videobox subscription which gets the price below $10. This is the problem with this method:
If you cancel your main Videobox subscription then decide to add say Vivid or Kink or both or any of the other add-on channels, it reopens your Videobox subscription. Or better said, it cancels out your cancellation of Videobox. It goes like this: Videobox canceled on 11/22/2015, membership lasts until 12/3/2015. Vivid channel added on 11/29/2015 Videobox renews on 12/3/2015.
I would be complaining more about that, but I don't think it's an attempt to rip-off customers as much as it is ... sloppy and careless. You just have to go back and cancel Videobox each time you add a new channel if added after your initial cancellation.
Overall, Videobox has little to offer me anymore except being the gateway to those premium channels. For a new member, I think it's a great place to start your porn collection. The quality can vary greatly even if it says a scene is HD, you really don't know what the quality is until you download it. You can kind of guess by looking at file size, but they don't list bitrates on any of their scenes.
The search engine has become all but useless. Even going directly to your favorite stars pages can be misleading. I've thought I'd downloaded every scene for a model only to see 2-3 scenes listed in the recommended scenes that aren't listed with the model. The premium channels cause a problem here too since the search results will give you results all across Videobox and all their premium channels. This is one that has bothered me for years. If you search "Taylor Hayes", a late 90s, early 2000s superstar model, she will be listed in dozens of scenes, but most are on the Vivid channel.
They do offer a package of 5 premium channels for an extra $50 a month, which is certainly cheaper than their current rates on those channels, but it's still pretty costly.
Downloading from the site is no longer as easy as it used to be. I use free download manager. With it, I can click and drag a link into it. Each time I do it on Videobox it says, "Select preference". I hate to be an ass, but didn't I select my preference when I clicked the format I wanted to drag to my download manager?
While Videobox is still one of the better values in porn, it's also becoming one of the more frustrating and annoying sites in porn as well. There's also the problem with videos playing while you're trying to load your download manager and you rarely have taken the time to mute those videos so expect everyone in your house to wonder who's having sex.
You could do far worse than Videobox, but it's time for Videobox to give up its crown as the best porn DVD site. I also have a membership to Videosz and will review it soon. Videobox might be depending too much on their premium channels to deliver non-mainstream porn.
I joined for one main reason. I couldn't find my Videobox external hard drive following a move. I downloaded my favorite scenes, most of which were on Vivid and added a 100 GB or so of Kink content. My current Videobox folder is smaller than those and it's why I rated it 80. If you're new to VB then add 10 points to the score. Recommended for new members and those who have lost their favorite scenes.
My answer is "not anymore". Too many sites are streaming videos when I click to download.
On a side note, since we've been having trouble with Firefox working here on PU, the newest version of Firefox has a mute button on each tab you open. I've been using that function to stop any unwanted porn noises. Don't know how long its been on Firefox, but it works well
When I was younger I liked most beers.
Into my 20s - 30s, I liked whiskey, bourbon and some cognacs.
From my 30s heading into 40s, I liked mostly higher-end whiskey and cognac.
Once at 40, I started drinking water only and the occasional cranberry juice. Last alcohol I had was about 6 months ago at Smoky Mountain Moonshine in Gatlinburg, TN. Wasn't bad at all, but it had a very low alcohol content, something like 30%.
Will warn that I once, not long ago, got hooked on Wild Turkey Rare Breed 109 proof. That's a good southern whiskey, but became a hard habit to break once used to it.
I joined Reality Kings a few days ago for the first time in several years. After nearly downloading the entire, Moms Bang Teens site, I received the message saying I had exceeded my 24 hours download limit. They even have a full explanation of what you can download every 24 hours.
You can download 50 "full" scenes. These are the biggest scenes on the site. The HD versions are in the 2-3 GB range, I didn't download those though. I just downloaded the full scenes in 480p.
You can download 100 "clips" in 24 hours and 300 "one minute clips".
I think this is a lot better than the old 10 GB per day limit, if for no other reason, it's explained clearly now. My folder for the previous 24 hours has right at 20 GB in it. I should be able to get most everything I want.
The numbers add up to 30 days at 50 full scenes per day = 1,500 scenes in a month.
My wife really likes porn, but she's very annoying about it. I asked her last week if she wanted to join any sites. These were the type of sites she named off:
"Outdoor sex with people watching and masturbating."
My response, "So, something like an outdoor orgy?"
Her response, "No, that's too much going on at one time."
Her second one, "Trannies with women. Then a bisexual man joins in."
My response, "What the hell?"
Normally she's open to teen girls. Seems to be some kind of old fetish she has.
I think it's worse to remove an old one. I don't know how many hours I've spent searching sites for that one favorite scene I accidentally deleted. Also is frustrating if you're a collector since a model doesn't always jump out at you as one you want to collect, but those are the ones I store in my brain for future reference. I eventually decide to collect the model, remember that Site X had several videos/photos of her, go back and they're gone.
Yeah I got those too. It looks like it's their way of saying you get a site for free if you pay for another site or at least that's what the ones I'm getting are saying.
I went with too many sites. I remember joining 5 straight sites that had Lil' Caprice as their featured model. I really liked her too, but it was overexposure. Every video she was in seemed the same and I joined 5 sites to see these different exclusive videos? And to think, I was a member of Eve Angel's first solo site for 3 straight years. It could have been that Caprice was brand new back then, but I've not even fooled with downloading her newer videos on any site.
I think when it comes to porn:
People don't want to risk their bank statement showing up with a charge to "Barely 18 Nymphs"
I've also heard of people downloading porn for free because a new scene of their favorite model just came out and they don't want to pay for a full subscription to get one scene.
Last on porn, I think there's a lot of sharers who probably aren't old enough to have their own credit card, bank card, etc...
I think when it comes to music:
It's mostly younger people who just don't have the money to buy all the music they want. Especially in the current generation of teenagers, those who are used to getting everything they want.
The other group in music sharers, I think, are people who people with problems centering around wanting everything by a single artist. For example, they go buy a new album by a band and really like it, but don't want to spend $100 on the band's other 10 albums, so they download them for free.
In that same boat as Drooler. I don't think the raffle started until 4-5 months or more after my first review. My own slowdown in contributions is more because I'm at the point of doing re-re-re-re-reviews of sites. I had checked it yesterday, but don't remember the exact number. It shows how my own contributions had been falling way off before the raffle ended.
Last 18 months, 18 reviews, 1 review per month average.
My first 18 months, 140+ reviews, 8 reviews per month.
I enjoyed the raffle and spending the money on things I normally wouldn't buy, but it never was a dealbreaker or maker for me.
I first thought this was about a porn site saying you would have a fate worse than death if you canceled your subscription. No joke. I really need to start paying more attention.
I've always heard this saying tied to actions/reactions. Things then happening as the reactions to your actions that cause suffering in you. If anyone is bored and can take the graphicness of it, youtube, "Immortal Technique - Dance With The Devil". Best if you get the lyric version. Song will really shake you up a bit emotionally. The main person in it, Billy, would be facing a fate worse than death. Not to give it away, but he does die in it, but I would think what causes him to seek death was the fate worse than death.
I don't know whether to laugh at this point or slap myself on the head for even wasting another reply. I can see now that English isn't your first language since most of what you're saying to me doesn't make much sense so I will give you a break there.
Where I won't give you a break is on your reasoning for not listing the technical numbers of the site. What if someone doesn't know there is a The Best Porn review for I Dream of Jo and just reads your review here on Porn Users? Think the numbers might be useful to them? It's not like it's time consuming to add those. Those also add credibility to your review. I can promise you, putting the numbers is more likely to help others want to join the site than saying, "Jo loves animals and when she plays with them, itīs wonderful".
And please spare me on telling me what Porn Users reviews are for. You've been a member here for 1 week and have 1 review. I've been a member here for 6.5 years and have 233 reviews. While it's true that the reviews should show each person's different perspective, it's also true that 90% of your pros could be things that no one else cares about. Which is why putting the numbers would help. Here's an example that should be able to get beyond our language barrier.
You're going to buy a new vehicle. You want cupholders, air conditioning, leather seats, cd player, power windows and automatic transmission.
You read user reviews on the exact car you're wanting. The first one says, "It's a great car!!! I love it!!! It has everything I need!!!" Did that review help you decide if you want the car?
It also should be noted that not all sites have updated facts from The Best Porn and those facts that you linked to will be somewhat out of date in 6 months. If someone writes a review for I Dream of Jo in 6 months should they too leave out the facts, even though they've changed?
Agree completely on all of this. I especially love her scenes with Eve. The only model I've seen with better chemistry with Eve was Sandra Shine. Jo also seems to become a bit more kinky with Eve than the other models.
Hey Pat, I'll probably give it a try since I too like Jo and especially if it has new Eve Angel content. The webmaster seems pretty genuine in what he's saying. The reviewers seem like nearly all other fly by night reviewers, looking for or getting a discount.
I did think that was funny about the November 2013 updates. Someone defended it somewhere on one of these as a "typo". Looking at my keyboard, I don't see how Nov could be a typo from May, maybe on the first letter since those are right beside each other, but the a-o keys are on separate sides. The future date bothered me mainly because Eveangel.com used a similar method when Eve left their site. They just mass removed the sets from 2004 and listed them as 2007 (which was the current year at the time). Maybe Khan at least gets a chuckle out of all this mess!
thaavi, I never said it's a rip off site. I was asking if the content had been used on Viv's other sites, then reused here. It's a common thing for sites to do. Since I have the majority of the content for Eve from Viv's sites, I wanted to know if I was going to sign-up for I Dream of Jo and end up with a bunch of scenes I already had.
Nick, on this reply, you're saying the point I was making. I honestly had never seen this I Dream of Jo site. And if Eve and Jo are only or mostly only shooting on it or Viv's other sites, then it would be hard for most of us not to question if it's new since they're hardly around on sites like 21 Sextury where Eve has roughly 200 scenes and DDF where Eve has nearly 300 scenes. I do apologize if I was wrong.
I do appreciate the offer of a review account, but one of the rules here has always been we aren't supposed to review a site unless we pay for it. I will still join it and review it since I do like both Eve and Jo a great deal and have huge collections of each. I would like to see new content of them.
I don't know if I'm crossing any lines by saying this, but we have a forum here on Porn Users and also an announcement section where you could have maybe talked to our admins here, Khan or Rick and offered a discounted reviewer price to get some fair reviews. I don't guarantee that though since it would be Khan and/or Rick's call.
Most of the negativity you're seeing here right now is based on several sites in the past giving members free memberships if they come here and score their site high. I've always thought our members here are a unique bunch of porn fans who try to help each other by reviewing sites so others will know what to expect.
No offense is meant to the reviewers who have posted over the last few days, but I really think those high 90s reviews will hurt more than they will help. It may be hard to believe, but I'm generally considered one of the more forgiving and optimistic reviewers here, but out of 200+ reviews, I've only had 8 that are rated 95 or higher. While there has been already 4 reviews of 95 or higher on Jo's site in less than a week.
A few examples of why these reviews are getting a lot of negativity.
There's no mention of picture size in any of them which is a key selling point.
There's no mention about whether the photo sets are zipped for download.
There's no mention of the video resolution. We have members here who won't join a site that doesn't have HD resolution.
There's no total picture sets count or no total video count. Or even more specific ones like, "There's X amount of solo videos, X amount of girl/girl videos.
These all can be a huge factor in creating believability since these all show that the member really is a member and not just someone paid to write a high scoring review.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
