Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If you're looking for real amateur Asian porn, or any real amateur porn this might be a site for you.
- Around 900 videos and 7,200 photo sets.
- I haven't seen any censored scenes.
- Small, but very candid and realistic photo sets that can be downloaded in zips, this is fairly rare for an amateur Asian site.
- Navigation does what it needs to do and little else.
- Mixture of solo, m/f, threesomes, lesbian.
- Newer videos are 1080p. Not for sure how rare that is for what looks to be a real amateur site.
- Very good download speeds (85%+ of my max) very important on Asian sites as some are very slow.
Cons:
- No model names (usually a sign of real amateurs).
- No update schedule or dates on the scenes.
- Older scenes are as low as 336p
Bottom Line:
As most of us know most "amateur" scenes in American and European porn feature a guy with a camera with women that often become porn stars. Those sites also usually have top of the line video cameras and the only thing that seems amateur is the camerawork and the model you've never seen before.
This site, My Cute Asian, feels as amateur as it gets. There are 6 minute scenes of a shy Asian woman masturbating in the hallway of an apartment complex. The site's size makes me think it's been around a long time and the oldest videos with an unheard of 336p resolution only make me believe it's as old as I'm thinking and as amateur as I'm thinking.
They don't have a set ethnicity from within the Asian race. There are Filipinas, Japanese, Chinese, Korean and several others represented. It looks almost like a user submitted site.
While it might not appeal to a lot, I think it does to some, zipped photo sets of amateur Asians are extremely rare. The photos range from clothed and teasing in public, to full nudity. I'm willing to admit I could be wrong on the amateur part of this site. Without names, I can't say I recognize any of these models. The one thing that does make me wonder about the production is a few of the models have "My Cute Asian" written on their bodies.
Even so, I believe it's mostly amateur. There's a large variance in looks of the models, some are well below average, others are well above average. Some look older (I would say up to 50. Others look not a day over 18.)
The big plus for me here are the public or semi-public scenes. It's certainly more taboo in Asian countries than European countries and even America.
The cons show the real weaknesses. If you see a model you like you're out of luck. With no names listed you're not likely going to find any other scenes of her. There's no update schedule or dates on the files. On the older scenes there's not even a screencap. It just has a short, descriptive link and you either click it to see what it is or download it and hope for the best.
Surprising to me, the download speeds go very high and since these are amateur videos, many are 10 minutes or less, so I can download them in 10-15 seconds. I have been on several sites from Asian countries that take forever to download a scene.
Don't hold me to this count as the later pages on the site have no screencaps and I'm just trying to add them up. By my count there are 5 videos horizontal, 10 vertical per page and there's 18 pages. That would be around 900 videos. The time of each ranges from 5 minutes to 30 minutes. The photos are also 5 horizontal and 10 vertical and there are 144 pages. That's in the 7,000 photo sets range. The sets have anywhere from 10 photos to 50 in each and all are downloadable.
It could all be organized better but because there's no model names there's really not a lot of ways to organize it. They do have categories but the only categories are nationalities. There's a lot more to like here than dislike.
I have reason to believe they are updating. They list their video count in the 600s and photos at 5600, those have both went up by about 30%.
They do have tags like "hairy", "Chinese" and quite a few others but there's no way to tell how accurate those are.
If this was a standalone site I would recommend it for amateur and Asian fans but it's not a standalone. This site full of mostly amateur content is hidden inside the Japan HDV network. I scored Japan HDV a 97 mostly just for its content. To see that they have other sites like this one makes me think I might have shorted Japan HDV with a 97. I've been a member for going on 5 months and just keep letting it recur.
I will mention that towards the last pages of this site's videos and pictures, I saw one or two models that had familiar names and seeing that 95% or more of the scenes don't tell the model's name maybe there are a few pros thrown in.
The videos are downloadable and the quality does vary which is also common on Asian sites. It's definitely worth a look especially with Japan HDV included and Teen Thais too. This seems like one of the best buys in porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good MILF site that has a lot of sites.
- Very good video quality with everything on the site having up to 1080p.
- Photos and screencaps, both are downloadable.
- No limits on downloads that I've found.
- Very good download speeds (85% of max).
- Some interesting niches that porn could use more of including JOI (jerk off instruction).
- Nearly averages an update per day, seems to be 6 updates in 7 days.
- Scenes are generally fun-orientated, I would even use the word silly.
Cons:
- Way too many ads and upsells.
- Layout makes it near impossible to count scenes since they mix in the scenes you don't have access to without upgrading.
- I'm not for sure how many more times I'm going to be able to believe the 38 year old model is surprised to see a hard dick.
Bottom Line:
I had been meaning to join this site for the JOI scenes and the MylfBody (working out, exercise clothes) scenes.
Their JOI scenes are worth joining for if you're into JOI. Besides the talking and teasing, they will use a dildo to mimic jerking you off then put it in their mouth or pussy. This is a niche that I think is very undervalued in porn. They go a step further than most JOI sites with their models going all the way to nude.
The MilfBody site is also very good for those that are into fit women, women working out and women wearing workout clothes.
Here's the problem: These sites are not very big. Here's a list of the sites you get with Mylf with the number of scenes in parenthesis.
MylfBlows (21)
MilfBody (36)
Milfty (73)
Mom Drips (38)
FullofJOI (35)
Mylfed (37)
GotMylf (53)
Lone MILF (31)
MylfBoss (16)
They also have a MylfX series with each one have a subtitle.
MylfX TeamSkeet HD (20)
MylfX Fucking Awesome HD (18)
MylfX Lady Fyre (21)
MylfX SpankMonster (1)
When you combine them all it's a decent sized collection. I just get the feeling this could have been done in a much simpler way than having 13 different sites. In some ways, the multiple site format is good. I wanted all the FullofJOI scenes and all of the MilfBody scenes so it made those easy to get to but you will see scenes on the other sites that would have fit on MilfBody and anyway, how many ways can you spell Mylf or make a pun with it? As silly as these guys can be it kind of makes me feel like they're just sitting around trying to see who can come up with the funniest name for a Milf site.
I would have went with Let's Get Mylfical for the fitness one.
Enough joking for now. The models are very good looking, there are implants and some tattoos. I don't know many of these models. They are pros I'm sure. I do know Chanel Preston and her MilfBody scene was one of the ones that made me want to join.
There's a point I made about MILFs in the past and that is they're usually beyond the shyness stage and I think they generally perform better than the younger models. My favorite age group of models is 25-35, I would think most of these women fit into that group.
Good sized collection, very good video quality, good update schedule, downloadable photos, it has just about everything you could ask for.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A longtime favorite in the softcore niche, still going strong.
- 9,989 scenes, includes video and pictures.
- 2,307 models, all are teens or at least look like teens.
- Downloads are unlimited.
- 11 new models in the last week. The schedule seems to follow that pace.
- Long forgotten bonus content that I'll mention in bottom line.
- Comes with the Nubiles Porn Network, but is a strong, standalone site as well.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Is one of the better values in porn, especially on the yearly deals.
- Navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I've always been between 88 - 97 on this site. The content at times does feel too repetitive and that's what I'm running into in this current membership.
- Shy and innocent can be attractive depending on the model but it can also be frustrating and feels fake with some.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those reviews where I feel bad that I've lowered it to a 90. I've been a member of Nubiles off and on for at least 10 years. It's one of the best tease, solo, masturbation sites on the internet but those types of scenes can become repetitive if the models aren't standout performers in the genre.
Technically, the site is superior to 98% of sites. While they don't have 4K videos they offer 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p and 270p. Their picture sets are comparable to the big photo sites with downloadable zips in small 1200x800, medium 2400x1600 and large 3600x2400. With an average of more than one new model per day you can see that this site really doesn't need a network with it.
I mentioned the bonus content as I had forgot it even has bonus content. One of my favorite teen tease models is one of those, Katrina18, who I think had a lot more content on her solo bonus site than it shows now but she was a very popular model years ago. They have a bonus girls section and several other videos in the bonus section. They also show Sweet Kandie and Vicky Vane as being bonus sites you receive if you stay for 2 months or more.
Their navigation helps them even more. They have over 100 tags and each tag tells you exactly how many scenes they have with the tagged action. They have separate tag lists for videos and photos. They also have public tags for videos and photos.
There's a full, easy to use model list and something you don't see as much these days, an upcoming list of models that shows their next 3 models.
They also use CCBill for their billing.
You really can't find anything wrong with any of that. The content, really it's the videos, can be very hit or miss. I have watched 4-5 videos in a row without feeling anything that sexual about them outside of them being naked and cute. I think I have defended this in the past and will here too. A lot of these models are new to the porn world or at least in their earliest days, so there is some nervousness. I think from past comments, some viewers enjoy that, others don't. I fall into the don't group as I like to see the models looking confident and enjoying themselves. The ones that are not as confident don't look like they're enjoying themselves and look like their main goal is to get finished with the scene.
They do still film some hardcore scenes and it looks like they've dropped that to once per month. I don't usually download those as it's usually an experienced male model with an inexperienced female model and that usually doesn't do anything for me.
A feature I like in their navigation is the search by month and year. It works well here, I've seen other sites try it and between wonky dropdown boxes and bad clicks, it doesn't work well. It works exactly as it should here and the advantage to this is Nubiles has had their better years. Like most porn sites there are years or months where the content just doesn't feel as strong as previous months and years.
Another favorite part is the inclusion of major future stars before they were stars. Everyone from Eve Angel to Veronica Rodriguez to Valerie Rios has content here early in their careers.
It's very good content especially for those newer to porn and because I have heard this several times, for female viewers. I believe the perceived innocence is a big attraction for female viewers.
It's still a top-tier site in its niche, one of the best even but I just found myself a little bored with the content. I could also mention there's not a lot of variety in the races of the models which might hurt my enjoyment of it since I do like a variation in models. I would compare that to me not being as positive about ALS Scan as I used to be for the same reason. For most everyone else this is a site you should join at least once and give it a try as it's easy to use, easy to find what you're looking for and you're going to see a lot of naked, innocent, young women.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- All petite models, 5'4" and under while weighing 110 pounds or less.
- Still updates daily but the updates are slower than the other ATK sites. Six photo sets and four videos over the last 7 days.
- Nearly all of the models are attractive and they have most of the well-known smaller models here as well as amateurs.
- I'm back to preferring photos, over 31,000 photo sets and 10,000 videos, all are downloadable and there are no limits.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- If there's enough sites in the network to your interest, it's a pretty good deal as they've added ATK Girlfriends to the network. I think ATK Girlfriends probably takes away some of the newer content from ATK Petites.
Cons:
- I had wondered if the advanced search had been switched but it's not on here. It has me searching ATK Galleria, which is a completely different site. Back to the model list and finding the models you like.
- I also can't get the tags to work with any kind of accuracy.
Bottom Line:
This site has always appealed to me. Not only are the models petite, they are usually sporty/fit built and that's a favorite of mine. I've seen the newer stars here like Allie Addison with 19 photo sets and 5 videos and Vina Sky with 37 photo sets and 11 videos. There's a lot of the models that look like amateurs and you will find more Asian models here, including some favorites from ATK Exotics (new sets here, not shared).
I think the first porn that was filmed was most likely of a petite model. They seem to be naturals at porn. They're more flexible (probably gymnastics background), they look tiny next to most men and the ones at least on here are cute and giggly.
I haven't seen many lollipops. That's an old PU joke.
The photo sets here show ATK's strength. A nice 100-150 photo set of a cute, pretty, down to earth dressed and make-up, girl next door. They take their time in getting her naked and you get to see every step up of it. It's almost like taking screenshots from a video. There's not too many pictures but almost always seems like just the right amount. You'll see every part of the model even the shy ones.
The videos here are good but there's nothing really exciting about them. The pros are better which isn't really better since you can see them masturbating and having sex on other sites. Vina Sky's videos for all the ATK sites combined became instant download, stashed in a folder. She doesn't seem to have a bad performance in her. The model I compare her to a lot, Veronica Rodriguez also has some really great content on here. Isn't it funny, I probably wouldn't be that attracted to either of them in real life as I'm not usually attracted to slender women.
What looks to be standard now for all ATK sites, 3000x2000 on the high quality photo set downloads, 1080p, 480p and mobile on the videos. The videos are mostly masturbation/tease and I think it's really more about if you're in the mood for that. There are plenty of good solo models on here.
Despite the lesser amount of updates, Petites gets a slight boost in score from the subjective side as these are some of my favorite models, especially in the current models. Adding in the large amount of Asian models, it makes it one of my favorite ATK sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the biggest sites on the internet dedicated to "exotic" women.
- Around 3,500 of these exotic models and the majority have multiple photo sets/videos.
- Over 40,000 photo sets and around 7,500 videos.
- No download limits, videos and photo sets can be downloaded.
- Updates 6 days a week, usually 2 photo sets, 1 video per day, some days there are 3 photo sets, 1 video.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- One of those sites that favors photos over videos, at least in my opinion.
- Lots of big name stars before they were famous.
- Photo sets are usually a minimum of 100 photos and many are over 150 photos.
Cons:
- Navigation is not very good. You click on letter A and get 18 models, 21 pages, just to go through the models with the name starting with an A.
- Exotics is a loose term, there are Asians, black, Latina, Hairy, this is a con to me simply because it's pretty much every race except white shaved girls. There's a lot of models I skip over.
Bottom Line:
ATK Exotics has never been a favorite site but it has always been a site I join at least once a year. A lot of the interest currently is to get the Vina Sky content, 38 photo sets and 12 videos.
I think the photo sets are the strength of the ATK sites. The videos are sometimes good (action) but many of them are more what I would call tame even when they're masturbation and it's always been that way with ATK. The photo sets, especially of established models, are almost always early in their career, less make-up than you're used to seeing them in and more normal, down to earth, everyday clothes.
I don't see any 4K videos, the 1080p videos are very clear and crisp with higher than average bitrates. Even though I prefer 720p, they don't have any that I've found and instead opt to have a WMV SD, MP4 SD, Mobile and MP4 1080p version. I'm not going to take off any points for that but they really should look into adding 720p instead of the two versions of 480p.
The good side of that is the downloads are fast and if you know the model you're looking for, they have all of the videos for that model in one tab. It's like the navigation progressively gets better, which is kind of funny to me. If you don't know who you're looking for, good luck.
These ATK sites are huge and I'm going to try and review multiple ones. Most of what you're going to see here are solo/masturbation sets, some of the models are very good at it including Vina Sky. Something you will notice that might bother some people is the scenes with specific models often look similar. There are three masturbation scenes with Vina in them, using the same toy, on the same bed. It's a small complaint since the sites do try to keep an amateur feel to the scenes but it also cuts down on the variety in the scenes.
The photos are my favorite part. The sets are large, the women are rarely heavily made up with make-up and they usually wear normal looking clothes. These are downloadable in three sizes with the biggest being 2000x3000. They do also keep the models in their clothes for at least the first 20 or so pictures giving you some tease.
That's where the navigation becomes a pain. One I'm looking at right now is a black model and it's grouped in Black Women 16777215. There are hundreds of models in this group. Have no idea why there's an 8 digit number out from it. The problem with this is there are other groups of Black Women with a different 8 digit number. You really have to know who you are looking for or just find the ones you like and click their names.
They still use the rather vague niches of models like Black Women, Dime Pieces, Ghetto, Island Girls, Nudism, it just seems like this could be done better.
But you won't find many complaints about their models, the photos or videos if you can find the ones you're looking for. As a member of multiple ATK sites it's almost hard to believe how much content they have on all their sites. Exotics is one of their favorites for me. I still recommend it but plan on doing some digging and searching. I'll end with they do have a tag search system but I don't think it's very accurate, many of the tags only list having 3-5 scenes with whatever the tag is. I stick to looking for the models I know of then try to just browse over the newest ones. It's still the best site for those into "exotic" women, especially photo collectors.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-25-2006:46pm (Update History) Reason: Content became repetitive after a month.
Pros:
- A relatively unique niche that features masturbation, gaping poses and just about any niche related to the naked pussy.
- I'm counting 294 models, I'm not going to guarantee that as you the model list has 3 models horizontally and you have to count the vertical rows. It's possible I could be low or high by 3-6 models.
- Using the same counting format of 3 horizontal by 10 vertical, I'm counting 1,155 videos and 1,065 photo sets.
- Excellent technical quality throughout, will go into the numbers in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good at 80% of my max.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- Nearly an update per day, December had 15 video updates and 13 photo updates.
- A category I've never seen showing specific pussy types broken into categories including, shaved, trimmed, hairy, huge, tight, juicy and PJ tongue.
Cons:
- There's very little to fault with the site from an objective view. I don't think all of the content would appeal to all viewers as some of this goes into more extreme spreading and the gynecological area of porn making those subjective to their viewer's taste.
- More ethnic variety is needed. These are Czech models, I'm not real familiar with Czech models so I can't say if these are all pros but I only recognize a handful of them. Good variety on the body types, just needs more ethnic diversity.
Bottom Line:
To me this is a unique site as it doesn't specifically have masturbation in even scene or guaranteed sex in the girl/girl scenes. The focus is the pussy. Some of the scenes are of the woman or women just spreading their pussies, stretching them and showing different angle views of their pussies.
If their tags are accurate there are 298 masturbation scenes out of the 1,155 videos. There are roughly 180 tagged as real orgasms. Just under 100 are tagged as fisting and around 235 are girl/girl scenes.
Their tagline says they are the "Masters of Gape" and there's a lot of gaping, so I would agree with them on their tagline.
Czech models can be hit or miss for me. There's not a lot of exotic looking women but the women on this are generally attractive and most of them seem to really enjoy seeing how far they can spread/stretch their pussies.
The navigation is easy to use with tabs for videos, photos, models/girls and pussies (see last pro for how this category works). They have tags over in the left margin and they're useful tags. If you on the videos or photos page the tags are broken down into 23 "porn tags" these list the specific actions you're going to see. I'll throw this one in for the peeing fans, there are 27 peeing videos. It looks like it's a niche they've moved away from as the newest one was released in July 2018.
They also have tags for the type of model, as example: Teen, MILF, Skinny, Thick, Redhead, etc...
These tags do seem to be accurate as well.
The video quality is very high. Just over 400 of the 1,155 videos have 4K download option and all 1,155 videos have a minimum of 1080p as the highest option, these also have 720p and 540p options.
As a porn fan that is split on favoring videos/photos at about 50/50, the photo sets here are very good as well. You do get a little more teasing in the photo sets than in the videos and the photos are downloadable in 3 sizes.
Low - 1800x1200, Medium - 2400x1600 and Large 3600x2400.
As I said in the first con, there's really not much you can find wrong objectively.
They do what they advertise and do so in excellent technical quality.
Something I found interesting in the models was the one I was most attracted to is probably the oldest model on the site. I haven't found a filter for ages but she's the 45 year old Aubrey Black. It's not surprising she has a more exotic look to her but she also seems the most comfortable in these scenes.
There's not a lot I would offer as recommendations, maybe more time in panties before getting into the spreading, stretching and gaping. It would add the panties niche to a site that's all but dedicated to the pussy. That's a subjective one that probably comes from my overload of Japanese porn lately. I would even wonder about using clothing like after stretching, gaping, the models, putting them in a tight pair of light colored leggings to show how wet they are?
Overall, as a first time member, I'm really impressed with the quality of the content and the site's easy navigation.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of Japan's oldest and largest porn sites.
- Over 4,500 DVDs (averaging 80 minutes each) and close to 500 fully uncensored DVDs.
- Over 35,000 photo sets (averaging 100 photos each).
- Past download limits have been removed.
- DVDs are downloaded in one full file.
- Most photo sets can now be downloaded, wasn't the case in the past. All Gravure photo sets can be downloaded.
- 1,500 models
- Billing with Verotel, if your payment is declined they send you to CCBill. Both are trusted billing agents.
- Daily multiple updates
Cons:
- Source material limits the resolution on the videos, close to 3/4 are standard definition 480p.
- Most obscure content like Urabon Uncensored cannot be downloaded.
- Navigation takes some time to get used to.
Bottom Line:
J-Sex Network offers a unique porn experience. It's a DVD site. It has a large collection of Gravure photo sets. It has underground Japanese porn magazines for you to view. It has the equivalent of a Japanese celebrity site included too and an amateur casting video site it included. A few changes that have occurred on J-Sex over the last several years. The download limits were removed in 2014. The Gravure photo sets are all now downloadable. Most of the celebrity/tease photo sets are also now downloadable.
J-Sex started their site around 2004-05. Their main focus is on censored (mosaic) DVDs. About 10% of their DVDs are uncensored. They include a link to click to just see censored or uncensored. The video collection would make the membership worth it by itself. A feature I like when compared to most American DVD sites is you don't download just one scene at a time. The DVDs are downloaded in full in one file. The only negative to this is the newer videos are 1080p resolution and the files can be as big as 5-6 GB. There are warnings about using certain download managers. I use Free Download Manager and it works and is allowed. I set it to download two files at a time. In their terms they state when they removed download limits, it is within reason and that is explained as "don't have 100 connections going at one time".
The Gravure photo sets are soft, glamorous photo sets that focus as much on the outfit/uniform/costume as the model. Lots of upskirts, tight clothes and tease pictures (white shirts with no bra and hard nipples). These used to couldn't be downloaded as a set, but can now be downloaded in full zip files.
The BuruBuru section adds celebrities, models, athletes and is not much more than you would see in a fashion magazine. The sets are labeled by model and will feature 5-8 photos in 5 different outfits, most do have panties and bra sets, but nudity is uncommon. You can download the photo sets in zip files.
The amateur site included is also on the tamer side. Many of the photos look like ones the women took themselves. There are no zip downloads. They are broken into editions and each edition has 12-16 women in them. These do have more nudity than BuruBuru or Gravure, but it is mostly topless and in panties. These are underrated in my opinion. As I find the women in their natural state and normal clothing with light makeup to be very attractive. They also look more comfortable, possibly from being in their own homes or not being in a porn studio. You can download photo by photo if you find a woman you really like, but you cannot even use a photo grabber as the photos are listed as .html files until you click on each photo.
There is an AV Program section that has videos exclusive to J-Sex and feature various rare scenarios for Japanese porn, including younger women/older men orgies, holiday-themed videos, special action videos like urinating and bukkake. These DVDs are easy to miss if a person doesn't realize they are there. As they are not listed in the video section of the site. They have multiple DVDs in this section that have won numerous awards and the awards are listed on each of those. I would recommend new users to start in the AV Program. There's not near as many DVDs as the main video section has and the AV Program DVDs are all considered top-level DVDs.
You then have access to Urabon Uncensored, known as the "seedy, underground" of Japan. These are porn magazines, pictures only, that are uncensored and often feature Japanese stars that are exclusively in censored content elsewhere. You can download the photos one by one, but there are no zip files available.
The collection as a whole is one of the best in Japanese porn. The regular video section known as Movie Express features DVDs that explore some of Japanese's taboos: Mother taking daughter onto a train full of men that grope the daughter as the mother tells the daughter what to do. There are over 75 of the popular, but controversial grope train DVDs and 250 of the "family" DVDs. Besides those you have the standard fare for porn DVDs, male/female, threesomes, lesbians, lesbian orgies, group sex and even group masturbation.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Episodic type site, like a diary, of fun times in Thailand.
- Has multiple themes/categories that I will have to explain in the bottom line.
- Very pretty Thai women, not for sure if any of them are models or are just quick pickups, but they all appear to be amateurs.
- Though the video quality varies it's good quality and will go more into that in the bottom line.
- Bills through Vendo
- Good variation overall as the scenes go from cosplay, picking up a woman and taking her to a hotel, lesbians in showers, one of a woman pissing in a cup and drinking it, it's all over the place, there's nothing cookie cutter here.
- Nearly 200 videos which has to be a lot for a site like this.
Cons:
- My biggest problem with the site is it's slow. The downloads are not slow, it just seems like I click on something and have time to write a review before it opens. It's not that bad but it could be faster.
- Limited download options and no pictures which is a real shame on a site like this one.
Bottom Line:
I saw this on the TBP new sites list and thought it looked interesting. It's definitely interesting. A little odd, a little bit all over the place in what they're doing and it lacks a lot of features we are used to.
The site is called Thai Swinger, but it includes these sites: Bargirl POV, Dirty Thai Massage, Isan Unseen, Hunk Hands, Porno Travel and Two Week Millionaire.
All those combined have 192 videos.
The site has only been around for a couple years but looks like it was made about 10 years ago. But we're not here to review website layouts, at least not yet. Here's what you're not going to get here:
Model list, there's not even mention of any of the women's names.
Pictures.
Cookie cutter content, it's like a box of chocolates on here.
What's most interesting about this site are the women. There are some really attractive amateur women on here and they don't hold back in the sex department. There's some serious riding, grinding, bucking and very realistic, believable enjoyable sex going on.
Not all of the women are great looking, they're not all slim and they're not all Thai. They venture into Singapore too. It's like what Bang Bros was when they first started. These guys are just going around picking up women for sex.
It's different. If you're at all interested go look at the newest scene in the preview Porno Travel Monthly Ep. 23. The woman is very attractive. The scene starts with her in a long baseball type jersey. The guy taps her, turns some music on and she starts dancing, stripping and she gets so horny over the first 5-7 minutes just by herself that she jumps on the bed and starts masturbating. The guy gets involved around the 12 minute mark. Most porn scenes these days are almost over at the 12 minute mark. I really like those type of scenes.
I already told about the no pictures and no model list. The video quality seems to be based on which site they're from.
They have some 4K scenes. The download descriptions tell you very little. The scene I described above says Download HD MP4 - 1600 MB, and the other option is Download Mobile MP4 - 450 MB. None of the download options tell the resolution unless they are 4K and those just say download 4K. The HD download option is 1080p and the mobile option is 720p. I really can't complain about that. That's the lowest quality I've seen on here and I'm fine with 720p.
The part that really helped the score here is the way the scenes play out. The ones I've watched, the model is fully clothed, she strips, she teases and most of them start masturbating and eventually they get to the sex. I'm always complaining about sites not having the models fully dressed or getting them out of their clothes too fast. Most of these scenes the women control the first half the scene. And every woman I have watched on here believes these men worship them. I don't say that in a negative way. These women are very confident and when you watch their technique you understand why.
The massage niche is worked in and it looks real. It looks like they go to real massage shops and end up having sex with the masseuse.
They have a tagging system and it looks to be 100% accurate. I have tried multiple ones and whatever the tag is happens in the video. The amateur tag seems to verify that these are all amateurs. And they tag everything. They have a CFNM tag and only 1 scene that is CFNM.
It's hard to evaluate a site like this. I'm guessing there are legal reasons the women's names are not listed. They update roughly once a week. It's very rare to see amateur Thai women in porn.
It's very rare to see porn that looks this much like authentic sex. I would like to higher on the score. I think pictures would have added another 3-5 points. Other than that, this is one of the most unique and intriguing porn sites I've ever been a member of. Would I recommend it to others? I think some people might be hard on this site. It's not the easiest site to use and it's missing basic features we have come to expect but just based on the sex and how believable it is, I would recommend it on that part. One last part, the camerawork is much better here than other sites like this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site that lives up to its name.
- Very attractive, slender teens with curves shooting out from everywhere.
- Kind of like watching an old episode of Batman, Bam, Pow, Kapoww!
- Another of those sites were the content is very limited but that's all the more reason to download every scene and every photo set.
- Got it on a great PU promo of $7.87
- Epoch is the biller
- A continued show of what great content Team Skeet can produce.
Cons:
- Only 22 scenes. I could have sworn when I was last on Team Skeet it said this site had over 50 scenes.
- There's not much to complain about here, the bodies on these young women come with one con, those shorts and pants are hurting!
Bottom Line:
As an old southern farmer neighbor likes to say, lord have mercy.
He's praying for rain, I'm praying for more of this content!
There are only 22 scenes on this site and they are 22 of my favorite scenes. There's not a bad scene out of the 22. The scenes go from 30 minutes to nearly an hour. They come with a good photo set with each scene that can be downloaded and a screencap set that can be downloaded. The videos start at 360p, then go 480p, 576p, 720p and 1080, was someone drunk on the 576p version? I've never heard of that before. Maybe the curves on these models distorted the resolution?
I made a near fatal mistake of clicking on "unlock everything". That answered my question about how much all the Team Skeet sites area. It's a year membership and it's $289. I know there's been talk about the sites being merged into a new network and I'll be the first one to join it when they do it.
Years ago, I posted a review on Team Skeet when they were first using that name and their webmaster was so excited about my review he started offering me keychains and t-shirts only to run into our old friend Khan. Team Skeet was my favorite network but they started slacking and seemed to be losing their focus as a really good network with deeper scenes than most networks with the gonzo style porn had. These Team Skeet standalone sites are going back to the way Team Skeet used to be. They have fun, the women have fun, and there's just a good, sexy feeling to the scenes.
This site even with only 22 scenes is worth the one month join. There's a playfulness in these scenes that you don't see on most sites. There's more curves than you'll see in almost any scene unless the same model is in it and they have the quality, video resolution, photos, downloads, no restrictions with Epoch as the biller.
I just think with the right push they could be the top network in the porn industry.
These scenes on this site feature everything from Alex Coal shooting a gun to Gia Derza playing with a bunch of lotto type balls, the producers here have fun with the scenes and it makes it enjoyable to watch. Then the women in their 12 sizes too small shorts show up and eh, who needs fun? Really good site that is very similar to their site of Team Skeet called Teen Curves. I can't go higher on the score just because of the quantity. I can't complain because 22 scenes is more than I download from most sites these days. They need to make a shirt that says, "Thick'Umz". I would buy it and wear it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-19-2010:50pm (Update History) Reason: Does not include Idols 69
Pros:
- A good sized Asian DVD network.
- The PU price is really good, this site really is $39.95 without the PU discount.
- Good search features that apply to Asian porn (uncensored filter).
- Categories and tags seem to be relatively accurate.
- Some of the fun, wacky porn the Japanese producers are known for.
- A little over 18,000 scenes from 5,500 DVDs
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- I don't know the Asian models by names but a lot of these are very beautiful.
Cons:
- I'm putting this in the cons because it's more likely to be a con for others than it is me, the filter shows around 1,000 of the 18,000 scenes as being uncensored. I don't mind the mosaic censor in some scenes. I think it even adds to scenes but I think overall, it would be seen as a con.
- They have some strange ads. They're not obtrusive or a lot of ads. It's just one that opens on every video you look at and they are for other sites like Twistys, 21 Sextury, etc...
Bottom Line:
One of my favorite parts about Japanese porn is the quirkiness of it. They excel at niche content. They have 80 scenes that are "in public". If you've ever watched a public Japanese scene it can be really amusing. There will be 10-20 people around going about their daily business, drinking coffee, eating a snack, and there will be a couple right in the middle of them having sex.
They have almost 400 voyeur scenes, nearly 200 wet clothes scenes and they have a huge selection of cosplay scenes, around 1,300.
To the main con to those not familiar with Japanese censoring in porn. They put a mosaic over the sexual parts. They don't always work, so you get a little peep show built in. I was very much against it the first times I watched Japanese porn but many of the scenes are much sexier than you would expect. I don't know if the mosaic makes it feel like it's maybe more taboo than it is or if it just being different than American and European porn makes it more interesting to watch.
They have a huge collection of schoolgirl porn if you're into that niche, nearly 2,000 scenes. The scenes are hardly ever "cookie cutter".
The advantage to the censored scenes. The models and producers of course know if it's going to be censored so they do things you don't see a lot in American/Euro porn. Like masturbation with panties on. I know that's a big niche here. These models have been doing it for years and have perfected it. Being someone that likes porn to start clothed, it has that advantage too. You're going to see more teasing in clothes, in hose, in panties and that goes over well with me.
I don't think masturbation or solo scenes are as big of a deal in Japan as here. They only have 900 masturbation scenes but I will probably download and keep a hundred or more of those for the tease factor in them.
They have a scene with a model named Shinozaki Kanna masturbating in a sweater and a skirt with panties under the skirt that is one of the best solo scenes I've ever seen. Towards the end of the scene she has her panties pulled out with a vibrator down them. I don't think removing the panties would make that scene any better.
A few problems that I'm not for sure can be called cons.
The video quality. It's not consistent. I have downloaded scenes released in 2019 that are 480p and others that are 720p. I'm sure this is like with any DVD site, they are limited to the source material but it is worth mentioning for those that want the highest possible video quality. They are listed as high, medium and low. There are no numbers to tell you what the resolution is but you can kind of tell by the file size.
I'm not that bothered by the quality. My preference is 720p and I think these scenes look good enough. It's a trade-off for non-cookie cutter and cookie cutter.
Something not as common in American/Euro DVDs, nearly 3,000 of these Japanese scenes are listed as amateurs.
One more advantage to the censored scenes, the models have to be more creative. Boobs are not censored and it's just my opinion, you can still see everything just a little blurrier.
I'm glad I gave it a try. I found a lot of scenes to keep. I don't know if I would recommend it at the regular price but with the PU discount it's worth a month's membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An amateur site that comes with 10 other sites. I'm just going to focus on this one for this review. I don't think it is the best of the sites that come with it. I will list those in the bottom line.
- Very basic layout to the site, I sometimes wish all porn sites would go to this style of layout. I'm starting to think the slower loading sites add to the frustration of clicking and scrolling.
- Models are mostly amateurs, their looks vary as much as your taste does.
- The talking, masturbation prior to sex and sex makes some of the models that looked unattractive more attractive.
- Each scene has a video and photos that can be downloaded.
- Very good technical quality for an amateur site.
- CCBill is the biller
- Download speeds are very good (80-85% of my max speed).
- So far, the combination of this site and the 9 it comes with has kept me around for nearly 2 months.
- New model and scene per week.
Cons:
- Navigation options could be better. They have a search engine but it doesn't always do what I expect it to do.
- Maybe it isn't for everyone. It's not like watching a scene from a DVD. Not a con to me but could be for others.
- The videos seem to top out at 720p but the scenes are very long, not a con for me. The 720p is my preference and the files would be huge if they were 1080p.
Bottom Line:
I have joined this group of sites before but never really had the time to pay that much attention to the overall package you get. I once had a membership to Net Video Girls (included with this site) and forgot about it for 3 months. I didn't realize it until I went to sign up for ... Net Video Girls and it said I already had an account.
These are the sites that came with the Exploited College Girl (ExCoGi) membership: Net Video Girls, Backroom Casting Couch, Black Ambush, Casting Couch HD, Net Girl, Nebraska Coeds, After Hours Exposed, Spring Break Life, South Beach Coeds and Euro Coeds. I am not counting those in the score for this site but do think this package is an excellent deal. I would list ExCoGi as my 4th favorite out of these sites.
Exploited College Girls where mostly amateur college girls talk a little, masturbate a little then have sex.
There is a social experiment going on here. Some of the models really attract me until they start talking. Other ones don't attract me until they start talking. I haven't experienced that on many sites. I have noticed some models I know as professionals. I don't know as many of the newer models in porn so some could slip by me. One of the first ones I noticed was Abbie Cat from awhile back, she was a well-known Euro star but the majority look to be real amateurs. Amia Miley or whatever she goes by now is also on here but she was an amateur at some point.
It's always a good thing when I run out of room in the pros. I'll add here they have a good blend of models. There are white, Latina, black, mixed and just think American. They cover it well for an amateur site. Another pro, most of the models look like they walked in in their regular clothes and that's when the filming starts. On a few of the scenes the filming started in the car where the model starts giving the guy a blowjob while he is driving.
They do something with their videoing that I like. If the scene is showing the woman in cowgirl and the main view is from behind her, there will be a little picture in picture in the top corner showing her face. Seems like that shouldn't be that unique of a feature but I haven't seen many sites use that.
The content is simple. Here's a model, she wants to do porn. She's broke, trying to impress her boyfriend or make him jealous and she wants to be naked on camera. Most sites like these try too hard to make it "amateur" and you end up saying, "I wish they would hire a professional to man the camera." But not with this site. The camerawork is some of the best I've seen in the amateur genre.
You do get some variation with some of the scenes having two women in them. Where do you sell you soul to get two college girls showing up at your door?
The scenes are very long. The files I have downloaded have been as big as 3GB each. Some of the interview parts are interesting, the pre-sex masturbation is usually very good too.
I'm really surprised I have not spent more time with these sites in the past. It looks like I will go for another month and make it 3 months in a row. I think it says something for an amateur network when their 4th best site is a 90. In fairness, the two just ahead of it would probably be 91-92. They don't even call themselves a network. They just tell you are getting these other sites with it. Exploited College Girls alone would be worth the price of a month.
Recommended especially for those that like amateur models. There are some very pretty models on here that I looked up to see if they have other content and found none. I'm glad I had some extra time to explore these scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A classic group of sites now available with one membership. Includes Karups PC, Karups Hometown Amateurs and Karups Older Women.
- Excellent navigation, will detail in Bottom Line, maybe the best I have seen on a network.
- Over 6,000 models, over 33,000 photo sets, nearly 17,000 video scenes.
- User-friendly favorites section, bonus section includes 4-10 bonus sets/scenes from 18 other porn sites.
- Hardcore, solo, lesbian, teens, MILFs, mature and amateurs. There is a good blend of all of these.
- Download speeds are good (75-80% of max).
- Choice of who you want to bill with, I picked CCBill.
- Multiple updates per day, looks to be 2-3 updates per day on average.
- Newest videos have 4K option, there's not a lot of those but the newer videos do have 4K option.
- Photos are downloadable in two sizes, bigger size is 3000 long end.
- Complex but accurate (when I have used it) tagging system.
Cons:
- There's a little confusion on the main hub page. There is a list of upcoming webcam shows and a row of live chat models. No idea if any of those are included in your membership or need to be paid for.
- The numbers listed in pros can be overwhelming to cover in one month. That's known as a not really a con but could be seen as a con.
- Probably could use more tags in the hardcore scenes.
Bottom Line:
Much like the ATK Network, I had no idea there was such thing as the Karup's Network. You need to take a deep breath before joining a network like this one. Karup's PC (Private Collection) and Karup's Hometown Amateurs have been around since 2002. Karup's Older Women has been around since around 2005. That is around 50 years when combined into one network.
I'm going to try and explain what you're getting before I go into the specifics of this network. Karup's PC is a site like the early to mid-2000s sites covered European models. They still have their archives where you can see now retired stars like Eve Angel, Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine and all the other A-list Euro models in their early years. Karup's Hometown Amateurs is what it says. These are the Karup's Amateur models, they are not all amateurs, you will see a few well-known or at least known models. Karup's Older Women is what it says. Most of these models are over 30.
I thought the ATK Network struggled thanks to a lack of a hub page. Karup's has a hub and the amount of excellent navigation deserves to be covered in detail.
You have the option to use the tabs at the top of your screen: Sites (You pick from the 3 sites), Videos (All, Featured, Behind the Scenes), Photos, Models (can specify which site to see just models from the selected site).
This is where the navigation becomes more complex but very usable. When you select which Karup's site you want to browse, you receive a list with these tags in it: Softcore videos, hardcore videos, below those there are 7 tags for photos, "amateur photos", "exotics photos", "girls with toys photos", "hardcore photos", "models photos", "older women photos", "teen photos".
The complexity shows when you select "older women photos" while in the Karup's PC site, it shows the older women just within Karup's PC. The accuracy once you go this deep into the search looks to be good but I doubt it is perfect. You can always just jump around those tags and look through the newest updates.
The model list is accurate. If you are watching a scene with a model in it that you like, you click her name (tagged) and you will see all of her photos and videos on the site. That is impressive considering there are over 6,000 models. The one part that still lingers from the old days of Euro porn are the aliases and multiple models with the same name. That is where the model list is accurate. If you select Nikki 3, it takes you to her page and you won't see any Nikki 2 in Nikki 3. Most of the aliases are not much different than the names we know the models by.
For me the big question is if there is a place for this type of porn in 2019. I like it but my favorite porn came from the pre-2009 years. There is a lot of solo porn here. The hardcore scenes are not going to win hardcore fans over. They are similar to hardcore scenes you see on Nubiles and other sites that were more known for solo and lesbian scenes.
Which is one of the cons. It doesn't bother me but there is no way to search within the hardcore scenes. This is just from June 2019, there were 20 hardcore video updates between the three sites. Over that same time, I am counting 67 solo updates. I just think the lack of tags on hardcore scenes might make those a bit frustrating for a user. You definitely can't fault the amount of updates but I will mention there does not seem to a be a schedule to the updates.
Back when these types of sites were at the top of the porn world, the users knew all the models. You knew which models you were looking for. You're going to have to put a little more time into it now by going through the new updates to see which models catch your eye or just start at A and go through the model list.
Karups was always in the same area as the ATK sites when it came to photo set quality and how they shoot the photo sets. I'm not surprised that my favorite photos on here are the Karup's Hometown Amateurs. You are more likely to get the fully clothed at the beginning photo sets with the amateurs.
Overall, for the price especially, these three sites are a very good deal.
I will throw this in too. If you just go to "photos". It shows all the photo sets across the 3 sites and each one has a logo in the corner so you know which site is from. KPC - Karup's Private Collection, KHA - Karup's Hometown Amateurs and KOW - Karup's Older Women. It's a nice little touch they have added to make it easier to find your preference. I think with a little fine-tuning they could be up there in the top of their category, especially with a legitimate amateur site included. I wanted to give it higher than I did but I think my score shows it is a very good site. Especially for those into pictures of amateurs.
It's good to see a classic brand like Karup's climbing back up the porn ladder. Of note, I experienced no download limits/speeds that others reported in previous years. I was downloading at nearly 80% of my max speed.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A relatively old amateur network that has a ton of content and very collectible scenes as well.
- Comes with 22 themed amateur sites.
- Two updates per day, check the Bottom Line on this pro.
- Quite a few major stars before they were major stars.
- Excellent TBP/PU price of $9.95 (5/9/19)
- Probably the broadest range of women you will ever see on a network, heavy, slim, white, black, brown, ugly, pretty, tattoos, implants, kind of like walking down a street in the United States!
- There is a fine line between simple navigation and layout and outdated. It definitely looks outdated but the site works very well and is easy to use.
- Very good download speeds (80% of max)
- Videos are very good technical quality, up to 1080p, some explanation needed in BL. Also has photos on most scenes and can be downloaded.
- Tagging system is pretty good but it might be too vague. It still is helpful.
- Covers most interests in hetero porn.
- 100% exclusive
Cons:
- It looks outdated, like 2004 outdated but it really isn't bad. It does feel cluttered. That is nitpicking.
- It won't be for everyone. The various body types, the looks of the women, it's very amateur and varied.
- With the wrong person, the navigation could be very annoying.
Bottom Line:
This network features some sites I was a member of many years ago. It can be misleading. The network is listed as first being listed in 2013. The little hub page might have started in 2013 but one site I know I have been a member of before, T&A Amateurs is in this network and it was first listed in 2005. The sites look that old too.
I mentioned in the pros, the explanation about the video quality. They are remastering older videos but are not counting them as new updates. This might not be a big deal to some but they do lack video options. Most of the ones I have looked at have a 480p option and a 1080p option. I would like to see a 720p option in there. A few of the newest videos even have 4K.
This type of site can be difficult to review. One of the newest updates is of Tori Black. She's certainly not an amateur but the content does not look like it was filmed recently either. The last time I saw anything about Tori Black she was talking about her boobs growing. In this video, she has hardly no boobs. They could have filmed this 10 years ago and just now released it. I also noticed Aaliyah Love listed as a "mature". There's a little fudging on "amateur" status but overall, the models are probably 90% amateur.
This is the similar style of shooting the ATK sites uses. Sometimes I prefer this especially with established models. It's very bare bones, little makeup and it has a real feeling to it more than the studio porn sites give.
The amount of content is very high. There are over 6,000 videos and over 4,500 photo sets. As I go through the content for the review, I am still seeing some "pros". I just noticed Jelena Jensen and Kagney Linn Karter. The content still comes off as amateur.
The selling point of this site (besides the price) is the amount of content combined with the vast majority of it being of models you've never seen or heard of while also having models you know but you will see them differently here. It's like a pro model just moved in next door to you and she's just a normal, down to earth woman.
If you wanted to complain about anything it would be the separation onto category based "sites". One is "Fuck the Geek". There is really nothing to show these particular models as "geeks". They look just like the models on T&A Amateurs. Maybe that is a sign of an amateur site. There isn't much production value in these scenes. They do have one site called "Chickpass Pornstars", so that is most likely where the random known models are coming from.
The navigation plays a big part in all this. You do have a hub which shows all recent updates no matter what site the update is from. The top of the page has "network sites" so you can go directly to the site you're most interested in. There is a "video" tab and a "photos" tab. It's hard to find that much fault in a system that is this simple.
They also have separate sites for race like T&A Asians, T&A Latinas and so on. They have a few they have created like XXX NJ for what they have tagged as "Jersey Girls".
I have got to the point I usually don't look at "bonus" content since it is usually streaming only and/or very low quality but they have 6 bonus sites that are very similar to their regular sites with similar content. Not for sure why these are called bonus sites but they are worth looking into too.
There is no way I would have thought this network would score that high but they have a very high amount of exclusive content and it is very high technical quality. The 480p videos even look good with 3000+ bitrate. It's one of those sites that feels like they decided to stop pouring money into making it look good and instead focused on getting good content.
Though I did mention it in cons, I will add here the models should be the deciding factor for most. They have over 1,600 models. You will find plenty of them that only have 1-3 scenes. I have seen at least one with 250+ scenes. The good part of this is also the bad part, the ones I have liked the most only have 1-3 scenes and are ones I have never heard of.
There is male/female sex, blowjobs, lesbian, strap on, threesomes and even messy for those that are into the messy porn scenes.
It's hard to take much off this site.
Amount of content, quality of content, amount of models, two updates per day, covers most niches, plenty of amateur models, some pro models, navigation is simple and straightforward, all with the one flaw being the outdated site design. I'm looking over that for the positives.
Segpay is the biller, not the best biller to deal with but I didn't have any problems with them. There was a tricky pre-checked cross-sale that I almost fell for. It told what I was joining "Chickpass network for $9.95" and had to click it. Just below it was a pre-checked box for GFLeaks.
Overall though, I am pleased with it. I would recommend it at the TBP/PU price to anyone interested in amateur porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- At one time, one of the best multi-model, solo girl sites and it's still good, just with some changes.
- Download speed is very good (80-85% my max).
- Probably as much variation as you will ever get in solo porn.
- Other Aziani sites come up as closed when you click the links from within the sites BUT the content is now mixed in with the Aziani site's content.
- A pro and smack on the butt for trying to be different in a copycat industry.
- CCBill is the biller, no cross-sales and no ads unless you count their trusted friends at the bottom of pages.
- Navigation still works very well, they have an excellent tagging system but I said very well and excellent, not perfect.
- My favorite part about Aziani: They get models that you don't see a lot of on other sites. As a Lana Lopez collector, I'm positive Aziani has more content of Lana (10 photo/video sets) than any other site and there are many more of these.
- Huge site (see bottom line).
Cons:
- As good as the navigation is, once they started combining sites onto one, it does make it a bit harder to find content and to know for sure you're seeing all of the model's content.
- Hard to believe but the oldest content on this site dates back to 2002. Updates have slowed to 5 in December, three of those came between December 1st and 25th, two came on the 26th. The older content is poorer quality and the newer content is becoming very slow to show up.
- Rachel Aziani most likely has retired, her last set was 7/4/14.
Bottom Line:
I want to initially focus on the pro about the smack on the butt for trying to be different in a copycat industry. To my knowledge, outside of Sybian-based sites, Aziani was the first to regularly let their models ride the Sybian. These sets, if you've watched them, can be very hit or miss since the Sybian itself obstructs the best views but some of these videos are excellent. If Lana Lopez ever had a negative against her it was that she wasn't always "into" her scenes. A very pretty model that could easily pass as Jessica Alba. Her selling point was just that ... her looks, not even nudity. Her Sybian scene on Aziani is the most expressive I've seen Lana and it shows what us porn users most-likely missed in her career.
They also were the first site I knew of that had specific public nudity, exhibitionism with their site Aziani Exposed, that content is here on Aziani now. They even tried fitness models and even female muscle models. They had a separate site for those called Aziani Iron, that content is now on Aziani. I'm pretty sure TBP still lists them as separate sites but I can confirm the content is on Aziani now. They've tried the massage theme. They originally had 6 bonus solo model sites too. Three of those, when using a link inside Aziani, say they are forbidden but the content from those solo sites is also on Aziani.
One of their biggest strengths for me was the loyalty between them and the models. Most of the models have 10+ photo sets/videos, some have as many as 50. To me, this all brings a slight laugh since the site originally was for Rachel's husband Buzz to photograph and video her masturbating. Her friends then showed up and it never seemed to stop or find a happy medium. That makes it both sad and great to me. Rachel's husband Buzz is another of those photographers that the models seem to love to shoot for.
I'll let some of the numbers speak for themselves:
Roughly 400 models on Aziani with most models having 10+ scenes.
Nearly 3,000 videos and photo sets, each.
Videos go up 1080p, have 720p options, older videos go down in the more standard video sizes.
I used to joke in my reviews of Aziani. Rachel herself had talked about Buzz having a lingerie fetish, which isn't the best thing for those of us that like to see a model fully-dressed. I'm pretty sure I once listed one of the cons, 10 years ago, as "Jealous of Buzz". Most of the sets do start in lingerie.
I do think it's a con that Rachel isn't shooting anymore. If her information online is right, she's 50. I thought she looked attractive in her 2014 sets, maybe not as comfortable as she used to look in her sets but didn't see anything wrong with her look.
Even with the clutter of combining all those sites into one, the navigation still works, especially if you know who you are looking for. The solo sites that originally came with this site are: Dakota Rae Patrick, Amber (Bach) at Home, Priya Anjail Rai, Heather Summers, Mary Carey and Lexxi Tyler. All of their content is now on Aziani.
I was surprised when I signed up and saw a new update from an "Aria". I thought it was going to be Aria Giovanni but it's not, however, this Aria is also very attractive. I think that could be a con for some. The majority of these models are not teens. They also are more aimed at bigger boobs, including implants. These were the types of models that were very popular from the late 90s into the mid-2000s.
And continuing to find the sites that at least have some interest and focus on real photo sets, not screencaps, Aziani's photo sets are real photo sets. There are a lot of positives here. You have Sybian, public exhibitionism, a little different with the muscle models. There's not a lot of male/female sex on here. I do remember Rachel Aziani, the site, having male/female but I haven't found many of those on Aziani. I don't remember those being anything great. I'm pretty sure Buzz preferred the solo models playing with themselves for him and his camera.
If interested, especially if you're a collector, check out the model list. Just doing a quick scan over it, I noticed Lexi Belle, who has 49 scenes on here. I'd also like to know more about this new Aria and if she has other content. She has 8 scenes on Aziani. It's a site that's worth trying for the collector side and finding new models or even forgotten models. I just saw one earlier, Cindy Hope, that used to be one of my favorite models. It's not going to go much higher than a 90 but I do think a 90 is fair considering the huge amount of exclusive content that covers multiple genres/niches.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A no longer updating site in the Fantasy Massage network, that I personally think it the best site in the network even without updates.
- This massage niche was very popular for a few years then kind of dropped off. For me, the best ones didn't try to be that different from scene to scene and this one excels at that.
- Surprising overall quality considering it launched in 2008 and stopped updating in 2014, every video has up to 1080p quality downloads.
- Maybe the most realistic "fantasy" site possible since you would typically be nude or mostly nude.
- Very good DL speeds (80% and up of my max)
- Good navigation and despite the fact that it stopped updating in 2014, there's a fairly large catalog of content here (will go into in BL).
- One of the few niches that doesn't require acting ability!
- Photos with each scene that are screenshots.
Cons:
- This niche as much as any, has the "it's going to become repetitive" factor.
- As mentioned, it no longer updates.
- The scenes that try to do too much. Will go into in BL.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed another site from the Fantasy Massage network a few weeks ago and talked about how I thought this niche was very underrated but also poorly produced. A lot of massage scenes these days are just plain hardcore scenes that happen to look like a massage led into the sex.
Massage Parlor is the typical porn site of 2018. For me, it did way more right than wrong and it's one of the sites the network stopped updating. There's a part of me that believes these sites that stop updating, stop updating because they require more money to film, more time to plan, etc...
What stands out here is the vast majority of these scenes start out with the female masseuse talking to the male. The first 4-7 minutes is a believable massage, some of the masseuses start becoming aroused and grind their bodies into the man being massaged, they perform the massages in either robes that drape open or in sexy lingerie. It then progresses to either a handjob or a blowjob, usually further progressing into a 69 and the scenes last right at 20 minutes each.
That's believable to me. The massage scenes that turn into full sex, loud screaming and moaning, don't come off as believable. I would hate to think the main reason this site stopped updating was because it doesn't have much full sex on it but it does seem like that would also be believable. A couple of the other sites in the network also follow a similar beginning as Massage Parlor but go directly into full sex. I see massages as erotic, teasing and if done right, even mysterious. The temptation of going a little further than touching/massage is a realistic progression.
The good part is if you like this content there are 314 scenes on it and as mentioned in the pros, all 314 have up to 1080p downloadable versions.
You can see where they've tried alternate setups. They have some that have a masseuse in training, with the experienced masseuse playing something of a dominating role and forcing the trainee to give the male a blowjob. They have ones that the setting looks more like a hotel room than a massage parlor and a few that turn into multiple guys getting massages and blowjobs from the one masseuse.
I mentioned that acting isn't required in this niche and I believe that. The only thing required of the female masseuse is for her to give erotic rubs of her hand onto the man. This believably turns the masseuses on. Eye movements, eye contact, expressions, even breathing patterns work in that situation.
It's similar to my interest in handjob and CFNM porn. I like to see natural reactions from the females more than relying on their acting ability to make me believe they're enjoying themselves.
One of my favorite parts of this site are the models. One in particular, Chloe Amour, seems to love doing this kind of porn. She reminds me of Jessica Alba in some sort of odd way and she has 17 videos on this network.
Which is why I'm comfortable saying this style of porn is different than hardcore. Some of the models on here are extremely good at this style but are dull, dime-a-dozen, in regular porn.
This is one of those rare cases where I rate a site higher than its network. I've tried explaining that before and think I've figured it out. It's my way of saying, I would join this site whether it had the network access or not. I do think in this age of networks ruling porn, there are sites on those networks that stand out whether with our personal preferences or favorite niches. I've mostly heard negative comments from webmasters that say, "How can you score a site a X but only score the network that the site is IN a Y?" There, I explained it! The network itself is very good overall but I think the content on Massage Parlor shows that the network's other sites are very formulaic and are trying to meet some kind of criteria.
This network and site also gives me access to Adult Time but I am not figuring Adult Time into this review. This is solely on Massage Parlor. In my opinion, it's the best of the female gives male a massage niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another of the newer sites that to me fall into a "Premium" category.
- I joined 2 months ago on a $14 for 2 months promo. It comes with the site Pretty Dirty and this review will cover both sites. Of note: As has been mentioned about Adult Time, this site now offers me Adult Time access.
- 318 scenes between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty, all have up to 1080p and 4 lesser resolution download options.
- It's the type of hardcore I prefer since it requires me to imagine a little before the sex starts.
- Overall, good acting in the scenes I've watched, I don't know if I just like Abella Danger so much that I think she's a great actress or if she really is. Several others do a good job too.
- DL speeds are very good (80% and up of max)
- Photo sets available but they are screenshots and can be downloaded.
- Mostly well-known pornstars but at least here you do see more from them than their best scream in piledriver.
Cons:
- This doesn't make much sense to me but the sites feel cluttered. Maybe it's the colors they use?
- For every good actress in porn, there's a dozen male "actors" that are only good at acting at acting.
- Not for sure why they have Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty as different sites. Both sites have similar storylines.
Bottom Line:
It's kind of funny that I was just talking last week about not having any access to Adult Time, I then got access to it with the Fantasy Massage network and now I have access to it with the Pure Taboo/Pretty Dirty network. I'm not including that access in this review since I have no idea how long they will continue giving access to it.
I joined Pure Taboo back when they had the 2 months for $14 deal and didn't even know I had access to Pretty Dirty until the second week of my membership. Taboo is such a broad word when it comes to porn. I actually remember one of the first porn videos I ever saw being either Taboo 1 or Taboo 2 that was supposed to be a real brother and sister having sex. I was a teenager and just have vague memories of it. The taboos on this site are fairly common these days, going into the stepfamily niche and some that don't even use the word "step" in front of daughter or sister.
My interest in taboo is pretty simple. As long as I am convinced it's something that's not supposed to be happening, it's good enough for me. It's like when I admit to having a rebellious side and people in 2018 ask how I was rebellious, I shaved my head bald in high school. They roll their eyes. Then, I became a psychologist who refused to suggest prescriptions ... that always makes the jaws drop. Anyway, you're going to need your imagination with these scenes.
There's a decent amount of content between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty with 318 scenes as of December 3, 2018. Pretty Dirty no longer updates unless I'm doing something wrong. The newest update on it says 1 year ago. Pure Taboo updates twice a week.
I do think this content is rather unique because they almost go overboard with the stories. How many sites have this on a scene ... "WARNING: What you are about to watch is arguably the most shocking and graphic family roleplay scene we have ever filmed. We hope you find it equally arousing and disturbing!"
A recent Pure Taboo scene has Kendra Spade playing the stepdaughter role. She comes home to find her stepfather mad and fussing at her. She's fidgeting, he's blocking her from getting by while he continues to fuss and she pisses on herself in her tight jeans. I'm mostly indifferent to pissing scenes but this one is very sexy. They then work in the corny dialogue as the stepdad tells her to take her jeans off, you know, "so you don't track the pee through the house". She takes them off, he tells her that her panties are really soaked too. She starts to take them off and says, "Isn't this inappropriate?" He chuckles a little, "Yeah, if I was you real dad it would be." I can appreciate the laughs in porn but there's a fine line.
I should add that some of Pretty Dirty's scenes go more into "forced" scenes but you don't ever get the feeling it's non-consensual. Much like I said in the previous paragraph, I think this kind of porn also has a fine-line.
I believe the names of their scenes do as much to build a perception of the scenes as the actual scenes do. One of the newer ones is "The bad uncle returns" which I do think has more implication with it than the scene shows. The stories are mostly well thought out, acting overall is okay, so many of the female models seem to have spent the majority of their "acting" lives as sweet, innocent and go overboard with it. Kind of like the old pigtails and lollipops scenes.
And that leads to one problem with this type of porn. I would imagine that those who prefer the straight to action style will do a lot of fast-forwarding. Most of the scenes on Pure Taboo range from 30-55 minutes and a few didn't have much action until 15+ minutes had passed. That fine line shows up again. While it's easy to complain about scenes that jump right into sex, it's also easy to complain that "that's too much acting". I don't think I've ever opened a porn video and thought, "I'm going to kick back and watch 20 minutes of actors trying to convince me they're related!"
Overall though, Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty are a very good combination that's worth checking out at least once. If you can get the two months for one price, I think it becomes the cheapest of these premium, story-based, porn sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's top artsy but hardcore sites.
- The quality throughout is very high.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of my max) but the site sometimes is a bit slow to load. It's not my internet and my computer is considered a still viable computer in video gaming. I'll go a little more into in the BL.
- The models. Some of the prettiest models in the world and they use high production values.
- Update schedule isn't consistent but it works out to 3-4 updates a week.
- CCBill as the biller, there was a cross-sale and it was checked, it's to their other site. Kind of hard to see because their signup page is black.
- If you've ever liked their content, you probably still will. I think they're one of the most consistent sites.
- While it has nearly 1,000 videos, I join it for for the picture sets. They have some of the best picture sets I've ever seen.
- It's one of the few standalone sites these days that gives you your money's worth and more.
Cons:
- My score reflects the 5 point automatic drop. I hate this site's navigation. It annoys the hell out of me. The videos navigation is very good. The model's list is very good. The updates, which is the only way to find the photo sets, is one long page of scrolling. I expected a change on that but it hasn't happened.
- I'm trying not to use the word "heartcore" because I for some reason really like this site but don't typically like heartcore. But that is very much a con for some. It's kind of mushy.
Bottom Line:
X-Art to me is a site you could join for a year and wouldn't get tired of the content, if you like the content. And, it might take a year to get to the bottom of the updates page! Why isn't that fixed? If nothing else, easy fix here, stick a photos "tab" up there with "videos" and have 30-40 photo sets per page. I think I broke my my mouse's scrolling wheel on this site. I have no idea how much content there is overall because I get to 2013 and stop scrolling but open the videos, 40 per page, 24 pages. I not only know roughly how many videos but I can jump from page to page too. I was going to just do a 5 point deduction, but I believe an 8 point deduction is more fitting.
That wouldn't be a problem but I come for the photo sets. That's really my only legit complaint. I thought I had got around it. There's a drop-down menu that has "photos" in it. But all that did was put all the photo sets on the long, scrolling page!
If you've not been to X-Art before, it fits that "female-friendly" genre of porn. I hope I'm not being sexist by saying that. I know women who love the most hardcore porn on the internet. So, I'll say, in general, this is a more "realistic", mushy, kind of lovey style of porn. They still get very hardcore at times but it's done tastefully. That was the hardest paragraph I've ever typed in a review!
As I've gotten older, I have started liking the teen-style models but they're still not my favorites. And most of the models here fit the teen-type, slender, very pretty, if there are tattoos you don't see them often and implants are either a no-no or very rare. It's also not just male/female. They have quite a bit of lesbian too and some solo too.
I don't know if this is a negative but I like their pictures better than the videos. It's most-likely me. I haven't been joining or downloading much what I call "regular porn videos". I have downloaded 38 (exact count) so far at X-Art, so it's not that the videos are bad. Their picture sets have my favorite thing in porn photos, the models going from (usually)dressed fully to fully nude and they do enough of the in-between dressed and nude photos in their sets. They excel at it. The newest photo update wasn't one of my favorites. It's titled "Sex with Gymnasts". It's a lesbian set. There's nothing in the photos to make me think they're gymnasts. I was excited to download and view it. There's no stretching or upskirt splits. And they're nearly nude at the beginning! I hear gymnasts and I think tight shorts or tight leggings. But that's rare for them.
Videos are 965 in count, since January 2016, they've had the 4K option on the videos. It is a little sporadic back when they first started it but they're offering it on all of the newer videos. This shows the quality, at least to me, over those 965 videos, 961 have 1080p option. They also have 720p, 540p and 480p. The pictures are all downloadable and are 4000 long end in the "large" download file.
I even think I understand why I like their photos so much, the lighting is very natural. So you don't get the real warm colors like some sites use but you also do get crisp colors and I would even say the colors are more of a cool color. That's become more important as I've got older and my eyes don't especially like bright, vivid colors.
I also know why the site loads so slowly. It's that long scrolling page. Their "thumbnails" for each set are 350x400 resolution and I would estimate there's over 2,000 of those on that page.
I do like their solo videos. They have some with big toys and some with little toys and the models, as said, are very pretty.
As for the main male/female content: I've at least got over the feeling that it's silly to try and project love in a porn video but it's not just that. It's the mushy part that I don't do well with. I don't even do that mushy stuff in my life. They're up there making love. And I think that's where it loses me because I like the teasing and the playfulness and then they should go at it like jackrabbits. They never seem to respond to the teasing and playfulness like they've been teased. It's still not a big negative. The content is popular with some people and I'm okay with that.
The site is still a top site that's worth joining at least once. Can't complain at all about the technical quality or what looks like someone spends some time actually setting the scenes up. Just don't expect any double ass to mouth or even hair-pulling. Maybe that's why I like the solo videos better? Some of those solo ones look like they're trying to tear their insides out.
With solo content becoming more rare and focus on photos becoming even rarer, those who like those should definitely check this site out. And their lesbian content is on par with a typical lesbian scene. If they would fix that scrolling page so I could see all the photo sets, I would jump it up to 96-98 but that page will annoy some people. So, I'm going with a 90.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the original and biggest reality porn networks on the internet.
- For me, Bang Bros has always been about the models. There's all races, curvy, slim, in-between body types.
- By my count, there's 51 sites included in the standard membership.
- One update per day across the network.
- Videos are available in 1080p and on down. If you want 4K it's an extra charge.
- Pictures are also available for each scene and can be downloaded.
- A bonus group of sites can be added to your membership for $19.95 and include Dancing Bear, Dare Dorm, sites that used to cost $19.95 each to add, there looks to be about 25 sites it adds. Well worth it if you like the content as it's pretty unique content.
- Good download speeds for me.
- Navigation will also be in cons, but once you figure it out, it's above average.
- Cancellation has been improved, but only if you know what you're looking for.
Cons:
- I've only had a few cross-sales get me over the years and Bang Bros has done it twice, including this time. I still don't even know where the MyGF cross-sale was, but I received an email telling me I had access to it for 2 days then would be charged. There's 5 points off the score and a middle finger.
- The new navigation, I hadn't been a member in 4 years, is terribly cluttered and confusing. There's ads, there's lots of links that have nothing to do with Bang Bros.
- The cancellation process which I will walk through below to help others out if they run into problems.
- I don't know if this is fair to also list in cons, but one update per day across a network of 53 sites seems a little on the low side.
Bottom Line:
Bang Bros has been one of my favorite networks for well over a decade. This current membership has shown me the typical Bang Bros experience. Some hidden cross-sale got me. Navigation has so many options you're sure to find one that suits you. And there's a ton of very good porn.
One of the biggest reasons I joined Bang Bros this time was to redownload some of my favorite scenes that I lost a few years ago in a hard drive crash. Those older scenes are still there and I'm happy to have them again. I would have joined the add-on package as well, but have been busy and am now more than halfway through my membership and see no reason to spend $20 for a week of access. I might give it a try in a few months.
So, here's what I did when joining Bang Bros. I bought a Visa prepaid digital e-card and used it. It worked fine and even if their tricky cross-sale had kicked in, there was no money left on the card. Take that however you want. I love their content enough to go through that hassle, but don't trust their ethics enough to use my regular credit card.
Once inside, I admit, I was overwhelmed and shocked by the new navigation. Who comes up with these changes? While looking for my old favorite scenes, a little ad came up and asked if I wanted access to the 4K videos, hell no, leave me alone. I still can't tell the difference in 720p and 1080p. These numbers are not going to be exaggerated:
There are 16 options to choose from once on the Bang Bros website. Including, "meet and fuck", "4K Ultra Videos", "Trending", "Free live chat", yeah, like anything on this site is free. What is "trending"? No clue. It just opens up a bunch of scenes. There's even a "Being watched now" section. I don't care what's being watched now or what's trending or about meeting and fucking.
Onto the content: Bang Bros shoots a style of porn I enjoy. It's not for everyone. I like the goofiness of it. In some sort of odd way, it makes me think it's more believable. There's a part of me that believes if a bus rolls up a college girl and offers a ride, she gets in, then accepts money from these strangers to get naked and have sex with the strangers, it's funny. I'll take this goofiness over the sappy heartcore fake love setup any day of the week.
Bang Bros shows 51 sites included in my membership. I went through all 51 sites and 5 are updating on a regular basis. They would say more than that, but there's multiple sites that hadn't updated since 2014-2016 and now have one new scene in 2017. If that's not bad enough, they have multiple sites that covered the same genre.
But and it's a big butt since it's Bang Bros, I can't imagine anyone ever running out of content to download from here. In their defense on the dead sites -- not that I want to defend them -- there's sites like Living with Anna, that's eventual prolific porn star Abella Anderson, in her earliest content, including pre-implants. They have at least a dozen of these types of sites that were once standalone sites that they've bought out and now give members access to. I'm admittedly a big fan of Abella, and this old content of her is some of her best.
***A quick note on cancelling, as dumb as it is, it's very simple, but even I, someone who has been a member many times before, spent 20 minutes trying to figure it out. You have to go "library" which is some sort of hub for the network, mostly an advertising page for the sites you're not getting with your membership. Scroll down to the bottom and there is a cancel link. Once on the cancel page it will ask what site you're cancelling, you click it and click cancel. It's that easy, but why this cancel link isn't on every page continues my thoughts on why I used a prepaid credit card. Here's the other catch on cancelling, if you have joined other sites (like the add-ons) or like me and got caught by the MyGF cross-sale, you have to also cancel it from the dropdown menu. So, in short that little used "library" link over in the left sidebar navigation is the place you'll find the cancel link.
Some more good parts: Latina Rampage is one of my all-time favorite sites and while it hasn't updated in 5 years, all the content is still there. They've also started a new(er) Latina site that is updating, called Colombian Fuck Festival that's very similar to Latina Rampage. That's very much the content that brings me back to Bang Bros. It's a bit hit or miss with most of the sites since they're not updating, but still have loads of archived content.
I would recommend it despite the frustrations and recommend using a prepaid Visa to join. I wouldn't say that if not for them putting the cross-sale on me. Their content to me is still better than 95% of the content I've seen. The amount of genres is almost unbelievable from Gloryhole, Casting, MILF, Teens, all races of women, corny reality-themed porn and whatever else their twisted minds come up with.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long running site that offers good (mostly) amateur masturbation pictures and videos.
- Good TBP/PU discounted price, especially if you haven't been a member for awhile or even ever.
- Navigation is good, but can be a bit wonky at times, my main problem is the picture near the top of the main page, it scrolls when I try to scroll the website.
- Good technical quality, newer videos have 1080p option and photo sets are downloadable in zips, the XL photo sets are 3000 long end.
- Well above-average DL speeds, about 80-85% of my max download speed (on porn sites).
- Updates daily, most days have multiple updates.
- Maybe the strongest pro is the models, for the most part, seem to be real amateurs who bring themselves to orgasm.
- This could be a con for some, there's also some "bonus" content from ATK Exotics, ATK Girlfriends, ATK Hairy and Wet and Puffy.
- One of personal preference, most of the models dress in normal, everyday clothes to start the sets.
Cons:
- Watch me not win over any fans with this one. I really don't like ATK Hairy. I understand there are men and women who like seeing hairy women, but the underarm hair is just too much. One can look over at some of my old ATK reviews where I also complained about the Hairy content.
- Nitpicking here much like Raging Buddhist's recent comment, I don't like the interview videos. Seriously, why would I care what an adult model says about the adult video industry?
- One that all sites using amateur models runs into, a lot of the models are shy. That's a con for me, but could be a pro for others.
Bottom Line:
I last joined Yanks way back in 2011. I did enjoy the content back then, but I thought the site lacked a certain personality I like a site to have. I compared Yanks to I Feel Myself back then and still think they're similar. The "personality" I look for is the opposite of shy. The transition from dressed to fully nude is still lacking in the majority of the videos. Most I have watched start nude and end ... well, nude. That's just a personal preference and lets have some understanding here, I've reviewed and been a member of over 200 sites. At this point, there are just things that annoy me. I'll even explain the clothed to nude preference. It lets me see what the model would look like if I saw her in person at the store.
One place this site scores high with me is its picture sets. Which continues my clothed to nude preference. The vast majority of their photo sets do start clothed and end nude with flash/teasing in-between. I enjoy these photo sets as much as the videos.
I put a con on the Hairy sets. It looks like Yanks also has their own Hairy models. Believe it or not, burn me at the stake for it, but those turn my stomach. I've told it before, I shave my head, I hate most body hair and have been this way for most of my life. But, a little neatly trimmed bush is fine, see my all-time favorite model Eve Angel. We're not talking about bush though. We're talking hairier armpits than mine. And those models are right there in the updates with no way for me to remove them from my view.
Most of that complaining isn't that bad. I like Yanks and am glad I returned. They have a lot of models I really like. Was glad to see a little heavier model like Jennavive Marie. There's some older models too. And all in all, the masturbation and orgasms are about as real as you're going to see in internet porn.
Navigation is good. They even have the bonus content from the other sites in drop-down boxes so you can easily switch from Yanks content to whichever bonus site you like. There's another side too. Straight male masturbation site called Club Stroke. Which I think is an underused concept on porn sites these days. My wife likes porn too so she can check those out. I've always wondered why more sites don't try this gender mix format. Download speeds are very good across the sites.
There's a lot of content, by my count:
2,120 videos
1,353 photo sets
Those are just the Yanks only numbers and don't include the bonus content from the other sites.
Here's the problem and it's what Raging Buddhist commented on, those video numbers include interviews, playing around videos and what I would consider non-porn videos. Which is why the navigation is considered just good. There's no way to remove the videos you're not interested in. A quick fix? Put a masturbation tag on all of the masturbation videos and add a new option in the videos drop-down box that is just masturbation to filter those out or in, depending on your perspective.
Still, the content is good and the photo sets are very good. Sometimes photos can convey teasing better than video since it captures the model before she stops teasing.
The overall technical quality is very good for a site with this type of content. As far back as I've looked, 2011 or so, has at least a 720p option on the videos. And if I were to complain anymore it would just be to say they seem to be worried more about their overall video numbers than they need to be. This is a fairly underpopulated niche in 2017 porn world. No offense is meant to the models who tell their stories or talk about the politics of the porn industry, but to put it mildly, it's just not interesting. Some of the greatest solo girl websites have used interviews and behind the scenes with some effectiveness, the ALS sites come to mind and Twistys old content when Shap was still around. It's not a big negative to me. It's just once I get caught up on the content I've missed since 2011, it will probably be awhile before I come back. Though, I don't think I'll wait 6 years again.
I'm giving the site a boost from my 2011 score since this type of content isn't easy to come by. And I'll continue to stress how important the pictures are to my score. It's a very good site to me or at least to anyone like me who hasn't been here in awhile. There's even some girl-girl content in there too, but I've mostly burnt out on girl-girl. I believe if they incorporated some type of tagging system to separate the non-porn videos from the masturbation videos, I'd add a few more points to the score. The biggest point reduction right now is there are a percentage, 20% or less, of models I don't like at all. I could see this site scoring a 90 or higher if a few things were fixed. I would recommend it for a monthly join. Especially if you like photos. I've looked over dozens of the photo sets and liked everyone of them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm going to guess that this network is the biggest interracial network on the internet.
- It's also has some of the longest-running interracial websites included with it, including Blacks and Blondes, which has been around for roughly 15 years.
- Has what I consider to be the best Gloryhole site.
- Download speeds are very good. Right around 90% of max.
- Quite a few sites are included in the network that I'm pretty sure used to be standalone sites, so it's kind of rare content.
- Good mixture of female models. Most are above-average in looks and play their roles well.
- Very good quality, 720p from 2009 to 1080p starting in early 2012. Most scenes have downloadable zipped photo sets as well.
- Navigation is very good for a network.
- Epoch as the biller.
- Quite a bit of reverse interracial (stereotypical), with black girls being with white guys.
- Large amount of content, will detail in BL.
Cons:
- I've always said the name of this network hurts it more than anything. Can you imagine the look on my wife's face when I said, "I joined Dog Fart Network"?
- Stereotypes are in abundance here. If you're a politically-correct person, socially-touchy person, you're probably going to have a problem with some of the content. I personally find most of the content to be humorous and playful.
- Probably the only real complaint is that the network could be organized a little better.
- There's a download limit, but I haven't hit it yet. I've went as high as 12.5GB in a day without hitting it so I'm not really for sure if it's a con or not.
Bottom Line:
This was only my second time as a member. The last time was 10 years ago and it was only to Gloryhole, which was a standalone site if I remember right. I've always been fascinated by the Gloryhole concept. We live near a university that was supposedly one of the first reported universities to have Gloryholes in their bathrooms.
Nowadays you get Gloryhole.com and quite a few more sites. I'm going to mention this since I recognize some of these sites included in the network as what used to be solo model sites. Models like Spring Thomas, I always thought she was a solo model and her site has been around since 2003, either way, there's 6-7 of those type of sites that look like they were once solo sites. So if you're a fan of any of those models you're in luck with this network.
Now, here's my big reason for liking this network. The Gloryhole content is just more believable here than any other I've seen. And on top of that, your membership also includes Gloryhole Initiations. Those two sites are enough for me to join and be happy with my membership. The two combined have around 900 Gloryhole scenes.
But there's other sites here worth checking out. As mentioned earlier in the pros, Blacks on Blondes is one of the oldest interracial sites on the internet. I remember seeing their content and the Dogfart logo on TGP sites back in the early 2000s. Admittedly, I haven't and won't download much from Blacks and Blondes since it's very common, mainstream porn, but there's over 700 scenes just on that site alone.
I do like We Fuck Black Girls, which goes into the role-reversal of typical interracial porn. You just don't see a lot of black girls in porn these days, but they have 50 scenes on this still actively updating site. The newest update with Jenna Foxx is one of my favorite scenes.
There's really plenty to like here. While not all sites are updating and some are just updating once per month, they still are pushing out updates on average of every other day. I will say I took a couple points off because there's 4-5 sites that are on the border of looking like they're going to stop updating (no updates in 30+ days).
I'll also say their navigation is very good. You have a main network hub that shows all the sites and how much content each site has. Once you click on a site, over in the upper-left corner is the name of the site. You can click that and go to any other site in the network from there. The scenes come up in order of newest to oldest, 5 per page and over on the right side is a jump to page link, which allows you to jump back to any page you want without having to push back buttons or "more" buttons. It's very good and other networks could learn from it.
Here's a list of the sites you get with a membership, how many scenes they have and I'll list if they're still updating:
Blacks on Blondes 765 scenes, still active. Cuckold Sessions 173 scenes, still active. Gloryhole.com 565 scenes, still active.
Blacks on Cougars 87 scenes, no updates since July 2016. We Fuck Black Girls 49 scenes, still active. Watching My Mom Go Black 84 scenes, still active.
Interracial Blowbang 87 scenes, still active. Cum Bang 81 scenes, still active. Interracial Pickups 75 scenes, still active. Watching My Daughter Go Black 53 scenes, no updates since June 2106. Zebra Girls 54 scenes, still active.
Gloryhole Initiations 313 scenes, still active.
Black Meat, White Feet 40 scenes, no updates since June 2016.
Several of those above sites are on the border of being inactive. I counted 5 of those that haven't updated since late August, which puts them right at a month without an update, but maybe they'll come through with those. They seem to update in bunches.
These are the sites that look like they're updating, but I think they're just recycling old content. Main reason for thinking this is the video quality is 720p at best and the clothing, televisions, looks upwards of 10 years old. Spring Thomas, Katie Thomas, Ruth Blackwell, Candy Monroe, Barb Cummings, The Minion and Wife Writing. These sites have a combined 750ish scenes in addition to the sites listed above. There's also two gay sites included, Blacks on Boys and Gloryholes and Handjobs. There's right at 400 scenes on those two sites combined.
It's definitely a network worth looking at for a month or two, especially if you're into the Gloryhole scenes or Interracial porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A huge network with enough content to make three or four networks, won't be surprised if they eventually try that.
- Quality of new videos are very high 1080p with high bitrates to match, they've had the 1080p option for 6-7 years, but the older ones have lower bitrates.
- Two new scenes per day, each includes video with multiple format options and a very large photoset/screenshot downloadable zip as well (600-800 photos).
- Navigation continues to improve on all of these large networks. It looks like they're using similar software to run their sites on. Considering the size of this network and amount of different niches, their navigation is bordering on being excellent.
- Fairly impressive number of their sites are still active and updating, which is pretty rare for these big networks in 2016. More detail in BL.
- I'm sure it's subjective, but I like their models as a whole. There are lots of tattoos, lots of implants and lots of big asses.
Cons:
- Download speed isn't that good. Mainly because it's inconsistent. I'm not for sure if they cap members DL speeds, but can say most of mine download at 3.2 MB/s here on Brazzers. I've reviewed other sites where I was getting close to 9 MB/s. That's way too big of a difference.
- Their billing as usual is frustrating. First problem is it has a dropdown box when you're signing up. It recognizes the discounted price you are to receive. The dropdown box has "yes, sign me up to brazzersnetwork for $24.95" or "no, I don't want this special offer". What the hell? Paying full price is beside the "yes" answer? Getting a discount is passing up a special offer? Then to cancel you can either call them, chat with them or email them. There's no CCBill-type cancel option of doing it from their biller's site. You have to just jump through a hoop and hope the person you talk to, chat with, reads your email, cancels your account. They did send a cancel confirmation.
Bottom Line:
It had been maybe 5 years since I last joined Brazzers. I have more than my share of bad stories with Brazzers, but they have the site "Moms in Control". It's a site with women 35-45 that catch their niece, whatever fake relation they come up with, having sex and the older woman joins in. I really like this niche and it was my main reason for joining.
I can confirm quite a bit of the older content has been removed. One of my all-time favorite exhibitionist sites was Asses In Public. It's still here, but is down to 16 scenes. I have upwards of 100 scenes from it (from 2010) on my external hard drive.
That download speed issue is a problem too. I actually have a scene downloading right now and it's an older scene. I've always assumed the more a scene is being downloaded the slower the speed, but this is a scene from four years ago and I'm only getting 3.2 MB/s on it just like I get on the newest scenes. I was on Reality Kings a few days ago and consistently was hitting 8 MB/s.
Good luck with the billing company, ProBiller, I've not had any problems with them, but I've always talked about hating a hassle. That's what you get with ProBiller. How freaking hard is it to make an automated cancel page? And that dropdown part from the cons is just tricky. I've had issues with Brazzers doing similar before. I remember they used to have the annoying cancel page where you clicked cancel and it would say, "Do you want to cancel your membership?" You would click yes, it would then say, "Are you sure you don't want to stay on as a member?" Tricky wording. Looking for people to make mistakes by clicking the wrong answer.
Onto the content, this is where they excel. Moms in Control is one of the very best of its niche. And it already has almost 60 scenes. They then go through their typical Big Tits sites, Big Tits at Work, Big Tits at School, etc... They also have Big Tits in Sports, which is a poorly-represented (across the internet) niche that I like and it has over 250 scenes.
Their update schedule is acceptable with two new scenes per day (across the network, not on each site). Maybe more impressive is the fact that they have so many active sites on their network. As of June 28, 2016:
I'm counting 33 sites. Of those 33 sites, 18 have updated in the last two weeks and a couple others are borderline if they're still updating. That's pretty impressive.
One of the things worth mentioning is that this is very much a porn star network. You will occasionally find a newer or lesser known model on here, but the vast majority are the best known models. To me, that's both a plus and a minus. A lot of this content is similar to what you can find on DVD sites like Videobox, so it makes collecting certain favorite stars frustrating since you might already have a scene that is similar to one you get here on Brazzers, even though Brazzers has 100% exclusively shot scenes.
These are the sites I ended up liking the most:
Moms in Control would rate it around 90 by itself.
Big Tits in Sports would rate it around 82 by itself.
Big Butts like it Big would rate it around 85.
Day with A Pornstar would rate in the mid-80s for a least some originality.
Hot and Mean would rate in the mid-80s, but this site has changed quite a bit over time.
One I thought I would like, but don't is ZZ Series. This is Brazzers attempt at creating something like a DVD with a full theme carrying over for multiple scenes, including a parody of Game of Thrones.
So, there's plenty there to keep me (or you) busy for several months, especially if they're only going to let me download at 3 MB/s.
I'll add something a little different here. I too hate their ads and their embedded videos, those chat girl ads are maybe the worst. Here's what I do:
When you login and are on the homepage, go to the top where it says "Explore", click that and you'll be in a less cluttered, less ad-filled area. By doing this it removes the embedded video at the top and it removes the chat girls completely. Once into this part, the only ads I'm seeing are at the bottom of the page which isn't too bad.
Much like my previous reviews of Brazzers, I think they have very good content, very high quality content, even great navigation, but they could make everything easier, especially canceling. When I have trouble canceling a site that delays me returning more than anything else and it's the biggest reason I chose a 90 score. I don't know for sure how much higher the score would be without the canceling hassle and/or the tricky wording when joining, but I can say it would be a network I would join more than once every 4-5 years.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the longest-running, largest European model networks on the internet.
- The fact that I'm worried about character limit in the pros should be a pro in and of itself.
- Multiple sites in this network had long runs as successful standalone sites, you now get them all for one low price.
- Averages two updates per day across the network. Video and picture set included in each update.
- Had a TBP/PU discount of $14.95 when I joined.
- 12,540 exclusive scenes.
- Has been split into three separate networks, 21 Sextury, 21 Sextreme and 21 Naturals. Each requires a separate membership, but I had over 15,000 credits on my account and used those to join the other two networks, will give full explanation in bottom line.
- Lifetime membership includes credits earned for loyalty. The lifetime membership allows you to sign in even after your membership runs out to see what all new content has been added.
- Generally easy network to navigate.
- Excellent download speeds.
Cons:
- I'm guessing the credits system will always be somewhat confusing for new(er) members.
- The splitting of the networks makes it harder to find old scenes unless you remember which site they were from.
- Going to use the word "confusing" again as a member of 21 Sextury's sites for 10+ years, even I find the layout confusing.
Bottom Line:
There's been a lot of confusion on 21 Sextury over the last 5 years. They originally just put all of their sites on one network and had a descending monthly price scale for loyal members. Then they added the credits system. Then they decided to split the one network site into two networks. Then they added a completely new network, 21 Naturals. I'm all for change/evolution in technology, but it can be a little overwhelming and confusing.
I'll start with the credit system. By using the same email/login each time you join, you receive loyalty points. These loyalty points can be used for a couple of things:
You can sign-in after your membership has ended and use credits to buy a single new scene that has been added as example. You can even renew or start a membership to any of their three networks with the credits as well.
I personally like the credits system. For many years, as a collector of 6-7 specific European models it made it easy and cheaper to sign in and use my credits to buy a single new Eve Angel/Sophie Moone/Mia Stone scene instead of having to rejoin for a full month.
On my most recent membership, I was able to join 21 Sextreme and 21 Naturals for roughly 3500 credits each. Which is the one question I have. I really don't know how many loyalty credits you receive for each action. Still, it's the same as getting a free month membership or being able to pick up a new scene or two of your favorite model without having to rejoin.
There's lots of similarities between 21 Sextury and DDF, I think they're now even owned by the same company. 21 Sextury has Club Sandy, Pix and Video, Sweet Sophie Moone and Footsie Babes, to name four of the 21 sites included with it. In my past history here on PU, there's standalone reviews of those four sites. Meaning I used to pay the premium $29.99 each for those sites. So you can see how this network is considered an excellent value.
A little complaining: There's confusion. When I go to the main page of the network there's updates. Nearly every other one says, "Bonus content". What is it bonus content from? Another site? If you click on the updates you're taken to a download page that allows you to stream the video, download the video, look at the photos, download the photos, but the photo downloads are 1920 high end just like the videos. At that, the photos aren't even highlighted as if they don't exist.
The main page itself also has a whole toolbar of options including scenes, models, websites, 3D Sex Games, Live Sex, Interactive, Try These, Settings and Favorites. Throw in three separate networks, bonus content, credits and you can see how this network is most likely the most complicated on the internet.
The good news is if you're like me and use the keep it simple stupid method, you'll be fine. Though I have to admit, I'm curious about why there's a 3D Sex Games, Interactive, Livesex difference. Seems like two of those should be the same.
Those who like anal will love this network. Especially when it comes to the sites that are still active and updating. The still updating sites: Asshole Fever, Anal Teen Angels, Butt Plays, Club Sandy, DP Fanatics, Footsie Babes, Gapeland and Pix and Video. I think they used every word possible to describe anal sex in those site titles.
The sad part for me? Some of my favorite sites on the network have stopped updating. I can't count Sweet Sophie Moone since as far as I know she has retired, but also Lets Play Lez, Lez Cuties, Nude Fight Club and Cuties Galore have all stopped updating. It seems to show the shift from the softer, more solo/lesbian content they were known for to a harder, more 2016ish anal, hardcore, rough trend. Not that I don't watch the harder, anal, rougher scenes, but who isn't doing the harder, anal, rougher scenes these days? That change in style led me to lowering the score to a 90.
I can't really fault the content that is here and the quality is as good as you'll find on a network. They have 1080p options as far back as 2008 and continue to have 1080p options on all videos. It's just instead of the cute innocent 19 year old model stripping, blushing a little, then losing herself in a 15 minute masturbation scene, she's got two men all over her with four balls fighting for supremacy of her nether regions.
They do a lot of things right at 21 Sextury, best customer service I've ever dealt with, though new ownership might change that, very high quality content, zipped photos, a backlog of content that is worth owning if you don't already and realistically, if you've not been a member before, you could join for a year and still not see everything.
I wouldn't ever steer anyone away from 21 Sextury, simply because it's everything I've said above, but for those who have been long time members it does look like things are starting to change and at least for me, that change in style of scenes, isn't a favorable one. Oh well, I can always go look at their 100+ scenes of Eve Angel.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large site that has returned more to its amateur roots.
- In my opinion, the best site for those who like public flashing, touching, as these once favorites have now returned in nearly every new update.
- Models are starting to become more varied in appearance. There's been several busty-type models added recently (Darcie is a favorite). Also seeing more dark haired models, there was a time when it seemed like 90% of new models on here were blonde.
- Video and photo quality are both excellent, zips for downloading photo sets.
- Lots of sporty girls, flexible, working out, dancing.
- Site navigation has improved greatly.
Cons:
- The days of the more extreme FTV seem to be over. You rarely see the giant dildos or the FTV Toy, but it's not a con for me, could be for others.
- Webmaster or whoever programs the site goes a little overboard with the use of tags, really, it's not public nudity just because the model gets nude in a private backyard in Arizona.
- And the big one, the videos are still split into parts. I don't know how many times I've reviewed FTV or commented about it, but despite all the reasoning I've heard, "The different clips show the progression of the scene" was one, and another was, "Some people don't like masturbation, others don't like teasing, the clips allow users to pick just the ones they like". So does the fast-forward and rewind button.
Bottom Line:
FTV has always been an up and down site for me. Many times as a member, the up and down status happened from day to day. I admit, one of my favorite niches in porn is public nudity/flashing and even better if the model slips a little masturbation in too.
I like the combination of danger/excitement/arousal you see from the models in the public nudity scenes. And one really big plus for FTV is the models, at least to me, are becoming more and more amateur. I'm sure it's no different than it used to be where someone like Eva Angelina appeared here early in her career then went on to be one of the most prolific porn actresses of all-time.
FTV to me is the best public nudity site available that is still updating. So if public, exhibitionism is your thing, you should try it out just for those scenes.
The site's navigation has improved thanks to a new design in the member's area. New might not be the right word, but it was new to me when I joined 3 months ago. I had been away from this site since roughly 2010. It could still be improved by better tagging. All scenes now have tags across the top of their description. These are nicely done bold and bright tags that make it easy to see if a scene has something in it you might like. Some examples:
Nu! = Public Nudity, O = Real Orgasm, Ex = Extreme Scene and so on. These are very useful except for one thing. Since adding this tagging system they've went back and tagged every scene on their entire site. I will give them credit for not just throwing every tag possible on every scene, but there's the occasional misused tag that can be frustrating.
The frustration is made worse by the videos being cut into parts. Instead of just downloading one big file then scanning through it for the part you're most interested in, you have to download 4-10 parts then open each one and look for the part you're interested in.
If that's not enough frustration, the videos here are such high quality that it makes you wonder if they realize stopping to load another video is breaking up the continuity of the scenes? An example: Cayton Cayley (Candice) has a scene where she's flashing in a car repair garage. There's men all around and she's getting more aroused by each one that look at her. Then ... the video stops. Load the next one, watch the FTV logo for 2-5 seconds, video starts and she's walking to a room in the back where men are going to watch her masturbate. That's not only senseless, but it's illogical. One of the few believable things I've heard behind the reasoning of breaking the scene up is "Videos are shot in different locations". While I'm sure video editing software could piece those together still, I can at least see how one moment the model is nude in public, the next she's in a bed getting ready to masturbate, could also make the videos less natural-feeling, but the one I used above was in the same building. As are many others.
My guess is it will never change. It's been this way for over 10 years. Outside of that fairly big problem, the site delivers. The change from some extreme scenes to hardly no extreme scenes didn't bother me.
The size of the site can be overwhelming. I don't have near as much time to view/download porn as I used to so I've ended up staying at FTV for 3 straight months trying to rebuild my collection of their content. Updates are once a week and include videos and photos of one model. It's also still a great site for collectors since a lot of well-known porn stars including hardcore, extreme ones, were here on FTV early in their careers, showing some innocence and playfulness, you don't see from them in their newer work.
The interviews are often funny and show the model's personality away from being a model. I would even wonder how many models have helped/hurt themselves with these interviews?
I know there's been reviews and comments about the download speed being poor, but I haven't experienced any problems over the 3 months. My download speed on here is roughly 90% or higher of what it should be. Just tested it again before writing this review.
Overall, this is how I see this site: There's high-quality photos and videos. Decent download options on the videos and zips for the photos. The improved navigation (since 2010) makes the site much easier to use. Even the types of models have improved over the last year or so (subjective). But there's always that one but revolving around the split videos. I can say I took off 6-8 points for the split videos. It creates too much of a frustration situation. I can either download the clips I know I'll like and skip the others, which will make me wonder what I missed or I can just download them all, which is what I end up doing.
Even with the frustration, it's the best at public nudity and at finding very attractive amateur models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's public sex that sometimes isn't really public, that other times is very kinky.
- As with every Kink site I've been a member on there are high quality photos and videos and plenty of imagination with each scene.
- Navigation issues aren't too bad here since I had never been a member of the site and just scrolled through the updates, making it quite easy to navigate.
- European sets seem to really push the public limit with sex on streets and in barely hidden places that the viewer can still see the society functioning around. Will go further in BL.
- Models can be hit or miss for me. The older European sets had more models I am familiar with, but the newer sets, mostly shot around or in the Kink armory have models I'm not as familiar with. One thing that keeps this in the pros are the appearances of Isis Love in several scenes, though not listed in the model credits.
- Download speed is always above average on Kink sites
Cons:
- Scenes in America may push the limit of misleading advertising. I'm not of this belief, but the comment section of the newer American scenes have 20% comments complaining that they are not public, will further in BL.
- I'm beating, maybe flogging would be a better word since it's Kink, the dead horse when I complain about the photo sets being broken up into parts, but I feel it's important for potential members to know.
- While the site is plenty large enough, considering the complexity of the scenes, I don't know if it offers much for multi-month memberships or for many return visits. Numbers in BL.
Bottom Line:
This site had been one on my list to join. The last 4 sites I have joined are Kink sites. My overall impression of this site is good, but at times, I was either thinking things went too far or things were way too protected.
With any exhibitionism or voyeur site, I do need at least some believability. I have enough of an imagination to make most scenes believable. Having said that, I know a lot of porn viewers don't. The members comments on Public Disgrace use words like "false advertising" and "bait and switch" and these are not just 1 or 2 comments, but maybe 5-10 on some scenes. This is my feeling on it.
In the earlier scenes on this site, starting in 2008, it was more of an exhibitionism site than disgrace site. These scenes included recording the male and female models having sex in subway steps as traffic and people walked by. It included sex by the road as traffic went by. From what I can tell by the license plates on the cars it was nearly all shot in Europe. There are complaints about "where is the disgrace?" They do have some scenes that go into bondage in public places, but the majority of the scenes that are outside in Europe are much more regular sex as described earlier in this paragraph. The scenes take on a decided turn to filming in and around the Kink armory in San Francisco. They bring in a crowd to watch, these rarely go into the exhibitionism like the European scenes did since it's a controlled crowd and controlled environment, but these do bring in more disgrace than the European scenes.
How disgraceful? I'm sure it's subjective. There is writing on the model's body, "I'm a slut", "Whore" to dumping food on the model to heavy bondage. These scenes remind me more of Sex and Submission type scenes. Where you as a member have to choose is if you prefer the more public, less disgrace scenes or less public, more disgrace scenes. Only a small amount of the scenes really do both. I do understand and respect the possible laws they had to be concerned about breaking so I'm not really against either side, but I do prefer the more public, less disgrace.
Overall the site is pretty big considering the niche and complexity of each scene, however, it only updates once a week.
As of 11/7/2012 there are a total of 209 scenes. These scenes include photos and video. The videos are quite long ranging from 45 minutes to 90 minutes. The photos are split into parts on the zips.
If you're big on technical quality, this site delivers. These are the video options.
Smaller Screen is 640x360 in MP4 format
Most compatible is 960x540 in WMV format
Windows Media HD is 1280x720 in WMV format
Highest Quality MP4 is 1280x720 in H264 MP4 format
All 209 scenes have those options.
Navigation is pretty limited, but with 209 scenes, you can just scroll through pages of 14 scenes per page. It doesn't do much good to use the model search since it takes you to all the model's scenes on their family of sites, most of which, you won't have a membership to.
As mentioned earlier you get one new scene per week. With the newer scenes turning more to the disgrace side, this could be a problem for me with future joins. I don't want to say all of the American scenes are bad though. Quite a few are in more public places than the Kink armory and as long as they work the crowd into it, whether a controlled crowd or environment or not, I will still like those scenes.
Where they lose me is in the disgrace part. I don't mind bondage, but we saw a bunch of immature sites years ago try the writing on the model's bodies angle and it failed miserably for them. I don't think it's that I'm offended as much as it is that I expect more from Kink than this. I would think anytime you're dealing with a niche like disgrace there are lines that go into "That's not disgrace, it's just silly". On the other side, I wouldn't want them to truly go into disgracing the models either since I'm not even for sure how far that would have to go. The last side of it is I don't ever hold a site to stick directly with their name since the amount of urls available isn't that large and I don't know if I would ever want to be on a site that never changes.
I enjoyed the site though. It's different enough from the mainstream to keep my attention on it. I would like to see more public exhibitionism, but more than that, just enough to give my imagination something to work with. The body writing makes my imagination want to get a washcloth and soap to wash it off. Not exactly the point of joining a porn website.
I would recommend it to most anyone. The disgrace is if anything silly and playful. The models are pretty and some have never been seen. I just don't think if you're really into disgrace you're going to get it here and outside of the Euro scenes, I don't think you're going to truly get a lot of public sex unless you're able to tap into your imagination some. The one admittedly biased part is Isis Love being in some of the newer scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Was for years my highest rated site. One of the internet's biggest and oldest sites.
- The updates continue to fill the site up, 3 photo sets, 2 videos a day for at least 8 years straight, 365 days a year.
- The last few years content has had HD video and the added high option in picture downloads that are around 3000 high end.
- You see a lot of models you've never seen on here, though they usually start popping up on other sites, in a recent trend though, I haven't seen as many new ones as Twistys used to have.
- Search engine is one of the better ones in porn. It still will recognize aliases and I think it's the only one that does that. Also has all the regular tags for searching.
- To me this is the biggest pro and I will further it in the bottom line, if you haven't been here in awhile or maybe even never, you are going to see tons of content you haven't seen.
- Download speed was very good also.
Cons:
- A completely subjective con. I have had anywhere from 12-15 monthly memberships here, a 1 year one and four 3 month ones over the years. A bit of sameness has crept in for me.
- Maybe a word I've looked for before, I usually use it for music, but some of the content seems too polished, like it's overproduced. That could be the airbrushing which isn't near as bad as in the past.
- I think they could get more out of models than they do. Especially in solo scenes. It may be going back to being too polished, but it does seem that way.
Bottom Line:
Twistys has always been one of my top 5 favorite sites. I admit part of the reason I always liked it was the former webmaster Shap. You could email Shap with problems, questions and he would reply back to you in a day or two, if it was a problem, he would reply back usually in an hour or less. The selling of Twistys worried me because I knew that aspect was going to be gone.
My feeling now is that the new company running it is doing a good job. The content hasn't veered too far off the Twistys path and it's still sort of a harder glam site. My reduction in score is just because I don't feel like the site has improved any. It's possible that between my 1 year membership, in 2010, and now, my tastes have changed some. One thing I do know is that Twistys is now hurt by the retirement or lower activity of some models, especially Euro ones.
At one time, the Anetta Keys/Smrhova, Eve Angel, Stracy Stone, Angel Dark, Sandra Shine and the whole group that was going strong in 2006-2010, were a big selling point for me. All of those have either retired or just aren't very active, though there have been 4 new Eve photo sets this year and 2 new videos added.
This is my overall feeling with this visit to Twistys. I've seen it before. Nothing has really changed. Besides not having my usual favorite models, I haven't found many of the newer models that I really like or I should say that I really want to collect. That's not the site's fault though.
One thing I think is the site's fault is that they could vary the scenery more. Maybe push a fake different color wall in with paintings on it. I know, that's a sign of boredom, naked woman standing there and I'm complaining about the wall color. But that is the big con for me. I really feel like I've seen this content before though I know I haven't.
I really shouldn't even complain at all. They sent me a promo email that lowered the price to 1/3 of what it is if you join directly through the site.
The good and this is especially good for newcomers to Twistys or anyone who hasn't been on the site in a while. They have 1,095 photo sets per year, 730 videos per year and I have seen content as old as 2001. I can't say they updated that much in 2001, but I feel pretty safe in saying they have more content than a new member could go through in a month, maybe even 6 months. It's one of the very best sites for collectors of individual models since they usually have more than just a handful of photo sets and videos. They even added a new Georgia Jones video this week, who I haven't seen in what seems like a year or two. The numbers can be quite staggering even.
Those are my three favorites on Twistys. A few of the newer American models since they cover the world, not just a certain area.
Tori Black 17 photo sets, 14 videos
Tiffany Thompson 14 photo sets, 11 videos Georgia Jones 39 photo sets, 25 videos
You will occasionally find models that only have 2-4 of each, but there are literally dozens that have 10 or more photo sets and 10 or more videos.
This is all hard to find fault in for a new(er) member, but for me, I felt like I was picking through trying to find one or two new sets of the models I collect.
It would be a very good place to start a porn collection though. The high or big resolution zip files of photo sets have been showing up for a couple of years now and those are around 3000 high end, with a few that I have downloaded going over 3000. Newer videos are HD and have multiple format downloads available. Older picture sets or small zips are 1280 high end, with older videos, I would estimate at least 90% being at least 640/720x480.
Their search engine has always been one of my favorite parts of the site since it is able to recognize aliases. A couple of examples, Eve Angel is known as Eva Shine on Twistys, searching Eve Angel will still bring her up even though she is listed differently on their site. Anetta Keys is listed as Aneta Smrhova, searching with either variation of her first and last name will still recognize her and bring her up.
One thing that saved the score from dropping a little more, Twistys is now doing a Live section where they have a girl or girls doing a live video, it had only been happening once a month, but the last few months hadn't had a new scene. They are showing a new live video scheduled for this month so hopefully they are going to start doing that again since it shows a very good effort to improve the site with something a little different. I'm going to use the +/- again, when I say for new members who like glam porn with masturbation, g/g, some b/g, add 5 points to the score. If you have been here many times before, you could remove 5 points from the score. It's still highly recommended. It's also a good site for those who are interested in the photo side of porn with a nice amount of videos too.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
