| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Compared to Rubberdoll, Eva's site is angelic! Not to be harsh again, but I always disliked Rubberdoll's site. Talking about boring shootings and lifeless scenes they would win a prize. But I see where this is going, so I will stop here ;-).
|
05-16-12 05:42am
|
Reply
52
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Nice review. All points you mention are pretty valid. Especially the non DRM thing surprised me. Over the years I always tried to warm to this site but never could (Rubberclinic included). The models were not my type and personally it felt they had only two or three at all. The acting is kind of crappy with all the faked moaning from the start and the exaggerated slow motion of the models in every scene. I also didn't like Eva's preference for yellowish and frilly rubber. And the silly suspense music in nearly all of their videos is a real deal-breaker. The list could go on but I will stop with the bashing here. Suffice to say that's only my humble opinion. If 90 for you is the score of choice so be it.
|
05-16-12 12:26am
|
Comment
53
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
|
05-15-12 09:55am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
54
|
Quality Control
(0)
|
|
05-13-12 10:43am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
55
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I put some paragraphs into it. I hope it's easier to read now.
|
05-07-12 11:42pm
|
Reply
56
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
At LOL Lesbians they use the expression "Real Teen Lesbian Girlfriends Shooting Hot Sex Tapes At Home And Submitting Them For Cash". This surely sounds better than "Messing around with dumb porn users for selling professionals as amateurs who shoot their lesbian experiences at home". Anyway, providing just one 2 min. preview clip is not enough to keep me hooked.
|
05-06-12 03:09am
|
Reply
57
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
The preview clip is kind of nice, but if these are really professionals faking to be amateurs the site wouldn't be so interesting anymore.
|
05-06-12 01:00am
|
Reply
58
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
Reply of
UKInet Media Lt's Reply
Oh, OK, that's nice! But you should mark them accordingly. I was clicking away on all the "not first row" pictures and always forwarded to your join page. I know many other sites which have the same strategy and it's just annoying. Would it hurt to change the whole preview page into clickable full size pictures (would be 20 instead of 5 then)?
|
05-04-12 10:26am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Unless it's Trinity from the Matrix, please take them off!
|
05-04-12 02:18am
|
Comment
60
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
|
05-04-12 12:44am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
61
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I liked your review because you address many points I would have mentioned too and the final score seems fair. Have you ever considered to look at "I feel myself"? Personally I didn't like it much but in your case if you don't mind they have mostly solo scenes they do have decent video quality and usually the pacing is faster.
|
05-03-12 10:05am
|
Reply
62
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
Sorry to hear that. I am a regular customer there and never had this problem. Wait for the customer service to answer. Usually they are very concerned about customer problems.
|
05-01-12 11:39pm
|
Reply
63
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
That's right, but I really hope she visited a professional therapist before this procedure and had her psyche checked out. I still detest the surgeon for going through with this. Speaking about responsibility for the patient's health and well being etc...
|
05-01-12 03:22am
|
Reply
64
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Sorry, my comment is not related to your discussion of her name changing. After looking at her site I am still at a loss of words...My suggestion is to find the surgeon and inject him with saline until he explodes.
|
04-30-12 08:42am
|
Reply
65
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah, it's probably like that. Anyway, it's cheaper than before, but unfairly distributed over the world.
|
04-26-12 11:51pm
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
No. The only underaged girls I got to see until now were Hentai and since it's no real person...I sometimes wonder though why the japanese are so obsessed with loli pictures. But OK, they also look at guro, so...
|
04-26-12 10:25am
|
Comment
67
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
04-26-12 10:19am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
68
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Oh, thanks, really appreciate the info!
|
04-25-12 12:08am
|
Comment
69
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
|
04-24-12 01:55pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
70
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Maybe the movies are some sort of "making of" from the shootings? I think one should join Hegre for the photos though, the movies are only a bonus.
|
04-23-12 04:57am
|
Reply
71
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I will make a suggestion for such lists on PU and will be the first to participate, no problem. Seriously, has there ever been such a suggestion?
|
04-23-12 03:04am
|
Reply
72
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The "substantial number of people" is the problem (and OK, this is the result of the attitude). I would happily boycott MetArt if I knew a substantial amount of users would do the same. There should be a list with participants and if the number goes up to a reasonable amount it would have the desired effect.
|
04-23-12 01:18am
|
Reply
73
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I really doubt it will change their pricing scheme if I join or not. Just like I wonn't save the planet if I turn my lights out overnight.
|
04-22-12 11:45pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Maybe it's like you said it is but I think you underestimate the society and its influence on the individual's decisions. Even if one is unaware of it.
|
04-22-12 05:28am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Poll
I am happy to see my suggestion for a poll. To clarify the point "Maiming the concept of love", I was struggling to get the expression in the way I wanted it to appear (and this one is also meant ironically of course). I wanted to give a choice for differentiation here between social and sexual monogamy. Although most people see these concepts intrinsically linked to each other, they are not. So the number one reason for most people to say that someone is unable to be socially monogamous is sexual promiscuity. Social standards don't allow one to follow this combination. My point for this 4th option was, however, that (from my point of view) the level of commitment and trust one puts into his relationships should be viewed independently from his promiscuity. There are different levels of "love" and they shouldn't be discarded by social standards. I found a citation in an article which expresses my thoughts on this topic quite well:
"While monogamy is the perfect form of social organization, its pressure is eliminating all other options and putting aside the persons that are not capable of it and want to experiment other life styles."
http://hugocrispim.suite101.com/monogamo...ial-monogamy-a324570
So I polled for point four. Makes the most sense to me. There is so much love going around, I wouldn't want it restricted just by social standards or stigmata.
|
04-22-12 03:21am
|
