| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
351
|
VideoBox
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Huge choice of videos going back over 5 years sourced from the best mainstream studios.
Frequent updates.
Excellent range and selection of gorgeous girls and styles.
Great variety of video formats, bitrates and sizes including mobile devices.
Streaming video works very well with excellent navigation.
Older content has been recoded to the highest bit rate of the latest videos - many other sites don't bother to do this.
Excellent navigation and organization of favorites.
User reviews help to give you an idea whether to bother watching or downloading a video you're not sure about.
Can create custom clips (if you feed the need to).
Good download speeds (~200K/sec) and works with my d/l mgr of choice. |
| Cons: |
Poor download speeds (~50k/sec) for smaller clips - I guess the smaller vids are hosted on slower servers/networks?
Sometimes poor download speeds (less than 50K/sec) on some occasions.
Needs a very up to date PC to get the most out of the website - my 8 year old Dell mostly struggled with some things like setting and managing favourites. |
| Bottom Line: |
In light of all the other great reviews, this'll sound boring, but Videobox is an excellent site that's excellent bang for your buck.
The content isn't exclusive but is high quality both technically and in content.
The so-called DVD quality may only be 640x480 but it does scale well to full screen on my widescreen laptop.
Would be nice to see proper HDV.
Would like to see more videos from Private studio.
Overall highly recommended. |
|
01-17-09 08:42am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
BDSM - not an attractive sight as far as I'm concerned
|
11-29-08 01:12am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
The sexiness of the girl(s) goes a long way to getting me off but it's seeing the actual penetration (particularly doggie style or anal) that finishes it for me.
|
11-17-08 03:07pm
|
Reply
354
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
"740x480 fine HD-videos/DVD and streaming"
Surely you mean 640x480? I couldn't find anything that was 740x480
|
11-16-08 02:04am
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Have over 1000 videos on storage - DVD archive and hard drive - but keep 50-100 favourites on hand. Will probably never watch most of the rest but nice to keep, just in case.
|
11-09-08 11:37am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Regarding the comment about blowing a load on a girl's face, quite a few girlfriends in my past have admitted fantasising about having a guy cum on their face and chest, and I've obliged them quite a few times. Not saying that all women like it, but obviously some do so cumshots aren't all that unrealistic.
|
11-06-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
All are annoying but slow downloads and misleading advertising have got to be my biggest gripes
|
10-24-08 03:42pm
|
Reply
358
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I took a look at my previous reviews and after some consideration, concluded that I may have been a bit stingy with my score of 1-By-Day, but at most I'd rate it 82 percent.
|
10-22-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
1920x1200
|
10-22-08 06:02pm
|
Review
360
|
1 By Day
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Quality hi-def videos and photo sets.
Beautiful girls.
Fast downloads and works with my favourite DL manager.
Good navigation and organisation.
Girls on all sorts of machines.
Frequent updates.
Cool Iris support is very neat. |
| Cons: |
Not enough hardcore - site is mostly solo girl and girl-on-girl.
Hardcore content is same as on Hands on Hardcore, another DDF site so if you want just hardcore, you'd best give this site a miss.
Expensive for what's on offer.
Some old content is remastered, which in some cases is good, but it means less new content. |
| Bottom Line: |
For hardcore, I couldn't really recommend this site - after membership of Hands on Hardcore I was curious to see what this partner site had to offer and found myself somewhat disappointed.
If you're really into the girls then this site offers plenty of information, casting videos and Flash castings (something unique to this site).
Being able to browse photosets using CoolIris is a bonus, though I couldn't get it working in IE, just Firefox.
If you love girls with toys, solo girls and girl-on-girl action, then you'll love this site, but for pure hardcore girl-on-guy(s) action, stick with Hands on Hardcore. |
|
10-09-08 03:33pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I only very occasionally look at porn
|
09-06-08 12:44am
|
Review
362
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Great quality HDV (>4000K) videos with various formats and hi-res photo-sets with no DRM - can be downloaded with my favourite DL manager and download speeds are good (>200KB/s on my 2MBit ADSL connection).
2. Great mix of gorgeous European girls doing all sorts of things, some wearing very nice lingerie/stockings.
3. Good variety of hardcore scenes, anal, DP, gang-bang, 2-on-1, all the usual positions and some great ATM, cum-shots and cream-pie.
4. Non-member site tour allows you to browse the model directory and see their scenes.
5. Good site navigation.
6. Can send feedback about what you'd like to see in future releases. |
| Cons: |
1. Photo-sets aren't always the same as the videos, but that's a minor gripe.
2. The HDV videos require a pretty powerful PC to view so you might need to upgrade your system.
3. Many of the scenes are a bit samey but then again, you might like that - I did, after all, it is plainly a hardcore site. It certainly doesn't detract from this site's appeal.
4. Some of the latest video content has been regurgitated from older content - more on this below.
5. Content is not all exclusive - some content is shared with "1 By Day" and other DDF partner sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
For me, an excellent site that's well worth the money. It is what it says it is - a hardcore site with very little girl-on-girl action, mostly guys fucking girls and cumming on or in them.
Since my last review it has improved somewhat, with more single hi-def video clips and less of the smaller clips which made up the older content.
One thing I did notice (and that seemed a bit crafty) is that new content is actually old content "refactored" into single hi-def video clips.
I last visited this site over 2 years ago and it has improved, so I've increased my previous 95 score to 97. I'm a real brunette and stockings fan so if I saw more of that I'd be scoring this site 99.
DDF Productions - take note, and keep up the great work. |
|
09-05-08 03:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
363
|
Seska
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful girl, petite and very sexy, seems like she's having a great time fucking, sucking and licking with her partner and friends, both male and female. Great attitude.
Looks great in dark stockings, particularly when getting fucked doggie-style or reverse-cowgirl by guy or girl.
Amateur sex quite refreshing compared with hardcore sites.
No download limits or DRM.
Trial subscription is not limited. |
| Cons: |
Limited content.
Videos are 1-2 minute clips of 320x240 mpegs so not great quality but fine for your i-Pod/mobile phone.
Pics aren't very high res.
Sex is with the same few guys (her hubby and a friend) and gals. |
| Bottom Line: |
A fairly good site that you'd visit once or at most twice, some decent content though nothing really hardcore, but hey, she ain't that kinda gal.
I'd say it's priced about right but I couldn't see myself taking out a month subscription - there's just not enough content or quality.
Definitely a site worth visiting once in a very long while (I took out a month subscription about 4 years ago).
Judging from the site's content, Seska definitely seems like someone it'd be a pleasure to meet personally and hang out with, and not just because she's really hot ;) |
|
08-29-08 04:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
364
|
Budapest Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Looking at the list of linked sites at the bottom of the main page, I wouldn't expect much on the quality side from this site, _but_ I could be wrong.
|
08-22-08 12:28am
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends what you mean by "celeb"
|
08-03-08 12:49am
|
Reply
366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Don't usually use IE to browse images
|
07-28-08 04:12pm
|
Review
367
|
Brazzers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hot girls, especially if you like big boobs.
No DRM.
Fairly quick download speeds.
Good range of download formats and options - you can download clips, watch streamed or download the whole movie in a number of formats, including mobile devices.
Easy navigation and good feedback facilities. |
| Cons: |
Lots of fake boobs, some badly done.
Not a lot of variety of positions or cumshots.
Download speeds sometimes fluctuate to slow speeds.
Video quality/size could be bigger - no hi-def.
Older videos very small and not great quality.
Cancelling membership wasn't that straightforward. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'd been thinking of joining Brazzers after following a link from PU and seeing a few of the trailers: Rachel Starr's Doctor Adventures clip had me curious, but not enough to make me want to sign up for the full membership price - I'm not especially a fan of big boobs. Then I came across the 9.99 special offer...
I found of lot of girls and movies that I liked, but the site could do with larger-format videos - 640x480 isn't enough. Also there's very little anal and not enough stockings for me.
If you like MILFs and big boobs, you'll love Brazzers. |
|
07-19-08 12:20am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Sometimes I can go on for over 30 minutes and sometimes for less than 10, depends on when I last released a load.
|
03-30-08 06:26am
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Nothing wrong with a girl taking it in or near her mouth but a guy wanking himself off and cumming all over a girl's face/in her eyes is pretty degrading and not much of a turn-on. The best closing shots I've seen are cumming on tits, in the mouth and on/in the pussy/ass. The best is the girl finishing the guy off by sucking him, taking it in the mouth and then dripping it down her chin and onto her tits, au naturel.
|
03-13-08 05:32am
|
Review
370
|
Reality Kings
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Plenty of sites to choose from and it's fairly cheap.
Lots of pretty girls though quite a few are regular stars on other network's porn sites.
No download limits.
Works well with my download manager.
Straightforward navigation and browsing.
Photo sets provided as zip files. |
| Cons: |
The only good sites are Cum Fiesta and Mike's Apartment, perhaps followed by 8th Street Latinas and Milf Hunter (if you like 'em more mature with bad boob jobs).
Overall video quality is reasonable at best - older clips are split into 3 or more files and aren't great at 350x240; newer clips are 480x360 split files and the very latest are 720x480 in one file.
Quite a few photo sets seem padded out with too many similar pics e.g. final 20-30 pics of the set are the girl's face just after the cum shot with little difference between each pic.
Very little 2-on-1. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not a bad network of sites but in comparison with the competition, they're about 3 years behind in terms of video quality.
I don't know why sites don't remaster/recode the older videos to bring their quality up to date with the latest updates but in this day of HDV sites, the older vids here are only really fit for viewing on mobile devices.
Some may argue that the less than great quality videos adds to their reality feel - a fair point, but one that's lost on me.
For me, the stand-outs here are Cum Fiesta and Mike's Apartment, the other sites didn't do that much for me.
It's 5 bucks cheaper that most sites but then I might be willing to pay the bit extra for better quality if that what it takes.
The actual quality shown in the previews of some porn sites actually matches their content, but that's not the case with the RK sites, so I probably won't be back anytime soon. |
|
03-09-08 03:53am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
371
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Review
>>Lots of HD Video
Where?
At 720 x 480, around 1000k bit rate, none of the videos fill my screen and are hardly HD video.
I generally agree with PosterDude's comments, the Reality Kings sites aren't that great and the quality isn't really there in comparison with other sites. I last joined way back in 2002 (before I had broadband) and the videos were fine then because that was the standard for porn sites, but now I'd say that the RK sites are about 3 years in the past in terms of quality compared with their peers.
|
03-06-08 01:20am
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
They're not very attractive, especially around the chest and down below
|
03-06-08 01:08am
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Nude outside in the snow!!?? Not very alluring and the poor girl must be freezing her tits off
|
01-26-08 04:52am
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I second Drooler's comment, it's not about the size but the shape and form - big isn't always beautiful
|
12-22-07 01:39am
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Never feel the need to
|
12-15-07 04:40am
|
