| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
101
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
|
02-27-08 03:09pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You tell 'em Drooler! The fact is, usually before you sign up to a site, its extremely hard - if not impossible - to gauge *quality* as they invariably stick up a load of top notch horny pics and clips on the tour pages to suck you in (if you'll excuse the pun). But that is so often not reflective of the true quality once inside. It may be - it may not.
So we can't really use 'quality' as a criterion when joining - after all, we'd all obviously choose 'top quality' if we could guarantee it. But we can only allow a little faith on that point.
What we *can* gauge objectively is the *quantity* of material available on the sites; that's why this poll is so relevant, IMO. And when you have such sites as Sapphic Erotica, Club Sandy, Pics & Videos, etc. offering hundreds of movies and galleries, one does have raised expectations of what you should get for your buck.
If I could find a fault with this poll, it is that the highest option was '50'. I would have started with '30' and gone up to maybe '100' in my options. But I'm being picky. Good poll.
|
02-27-08 02:55pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Div has missed the point. He talks of '2-3 updates a week'. This poll is about the minimum archive you would expect for your 30 bucks, before you even think about updates. I take the point about quality, but that's not the issue here.
I went for '50 complete vids/galleries', and that's as a bare minimum really. These days there are sites out there for $20-$30 with archives going back many years - with literally hundreds of movies/galleries.
Sure, there's a quality issue here also, but that's not what this poll is about. If the quality is bad, then the size of the archive is irrelevant, as you wouldn't be interested anyway.
|
02-27-08 06:20am
|
Review
104
|
Hanna's Honeypot
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-All girl (like it says on the tin)
-Mostly gorgeous young Europeans
-Technically nice quality widescreen vids |
| Cons: |
-Why give Hannah her own personal site? She's not that great looking, and there are many other girls featured on the site that would be a better choice IMO, and all better looking
-The sex is quite humdrum compared to others
-Very little analingus or deep cunnilingus |
| Bottom Line: |
I must admit, I only got this site as a bonus to joining Only Cuties, and wasn't expecting it, so I can't complain.
I have downloaded all the lesbian movie content (23 of them at the time of writing) and I find myself fast-forwarding through them to try and get to the hot action, which is thin on the ground.
There are loads of Hannah solo movies (not counted them - can't be bothered). She's really not a particularly attractive girl, so its beyond me why she has her own site when many gorgeous and hot babes do not. She also obviously prefers to pleasure her girlfriends with her fingers or a dildo, rather than her mouth. So cunnilingus is not as plentiful as on other all-girl sites. Although, when she does do it, she's actually quite good. Analingus is very rare on this site though.
Picture sets are generally tame, and often don't really 'get off the ground'. You feel the sets finish before they've really started a lot of the time.
I gave this an 'average' score, as I know from bitter experience there are still far worse sites out there. But it's still very uninspiring. I won't be returning. |
|
02-26-08 12:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
105
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I agree with your comment, Elephant. I joined OC a couple of weeks ago, and it really can't compare with Sapphic Erotica can it? The performances are much more run-of-the-mill, as you say. I lost count of the number of times a video features a girl faking multiple orgasms from another girl just sticking her forefinger up her pussy for 15 minutes. Just dull. Very little full on hot cunnilingus and analingus. Too much boring dildo action.
|
02-26-08 12:15pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
Couldn't answer this poll as none of the options fitted my preference. My preference is simply 'gorgeous sexy women'. Don't care about nationality or 'style' too much, as long as they're gorgeous and sexy. I guess the girls that I tend to go for most are European though (e.g. like Sandy, Zafira, Peaches, Eve Angel, Anneta Keys, Sophie Moone, Dorina... so many!). Again, that wasn't an option. I tend to avoid Americans (sorry to our American friends) as I find them generally very annoying (too noisy and fake IMO).
As for MILF, there are a few drop-dead gorgeous older babes out there that just mature like fine wines. Cameron aka Lisa (featuring in many a Viv Thomas production) is probably the sexiest of all 'older' girls ('older' meaning mid 30s!). Sadly, I think she may be retired now. She's stunning.
I was briefly a member of a MILF site that is offered as a package when you join 'We Live Together' (or other sites in the same group). The girls were generally very hot, but the sex was fake and boring IMO, except for one or two.
I think you know my preferences now.
|
02-26-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I put 'definitely yes' because that has been my experience. I have a girlfriend, but we live in different cities. Friday evenings after work I go to her place, then come back home on Sunday.
During the week I keep myself satisfied with porn. But if I go there - or she comes here - for a couple of weeks or so during holidays, I do find myself not caring about porn. I do love good porn, and I do think about it occasionally when I'm with her, but it still takes second place by a mile.
I don't think it's a good idea to mix porn with a more regular love life. It saps your energy and desire for real sex (your nuts can only produce so much cum every day!). Unless you watch it together, of course. But I wouldn't want to do that. For me, porn is a solo activity, and that's how I like it. I also became great at cunnilingus from observing lesbian porn! She hasn't got a clue about me liking porn, and that's the way I like it too.
|
02-24-08 05:05am
|
Reply
108
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Yeah - thanks for your suggestions, I appreciate your time, RB. :)
I have since left another comment, saying that I found a solution, and am now using DTA - although not in the way I was used to. Right-clicking doesn't get you the file by any method at all (DM or otherwise). But LEFT-clicking does. Still doesn't help with FDM, but DTA does happily offer a way.
Cheers.
Davit.
|
02-20-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
109
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Actually, I have just discovered to my delight that DTA does work. When you LEFT click, a Windows box comes up asking if you want to play the file or download to disk...and another option for downloading with DTA!
Don't know why FDM (my preferred DM) is not on the list, but who cares, I now have DM support!
Thanks for your comment.
Regards
Davit
|
02-20-08 01:42pm
|
Reply
110
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
Where sites allow it, DMs are fantastic. Instead of just right-clicking a link and downloading immediately, you right-click it and load the link into your DM. You can fill your DM up with loads of download links (hundreds if you like!) then you can set it to work downloading all the files for you as you sleep! You also specify where you want to download the file to (which location on your hard drive) and can re-name the files in advance too. FDM is brilliant, I love it, highly recommended, won awards. But so far, no DM has worked for me with Only Cuties.
|
02-20-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
111
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
But have you tried it with this site, Robare?
|
02-20-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
112
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Down Them All does not work. Tried it after Free Download Manager didn't work. Problem is, right-clicking a link doesn't take you to the file. It brings up a file called 'download_video.php'. You have to left click it and then only using the Windows pop-up will give you the file, not FDM or DTA.
Whenever I use a download manager, it just beings up the file called download_video.php (which downloads in about a nanosecond).
Same happens with Dorothy Black's site, but customer support responded to a comment I left on PU, saying they were going to bring in DM support soon.
Are you saying there is actually a DM that definitely works for this site that you have had success with?
Thanks in advance.
|
02-20-08 01:21pm
|
Comment
113
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
|
02-19-08 04:23pm
Replies (11)
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
You got me thinking of a whole new genre of porn - Eskimo porn! Man, some of those Eskimo chicks are hot! Well, actually, in real terms they're probably quite cold, but you take my point. I can think of a few ways they could defrost my dick. I'd love to dip my rod in their fish hole.
I'm sorry, it's late, and crap double-entendres seem funnier at this time of night.
|
02-19-08 03:38pm
|
Reply
115
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Just a small point: the British pound has nothing to do with the Euro!
|
02-18-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Or James Hanson. Actually, don't ask him, whatever you do. He'll just find a way of linking it to global warming, like he does everything else. We'll have to buy porn credits, and be accountable for our spunk footprint. Guys with vasectomies will be taxed less of course, for 'running on unleaded' with lower emissions. And developing nations will be deprived of ever getting the porn we in the West enjoy.
You can see I've given this serious thought.
My head hurts.
|
02-18-08 03:34pm
|
Comment
117
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
|
02-18-08 03:02pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Monahan has it right - this is all about Market Research. Although, I still fail to see how useful this info is! I mean, what is night for one person will be mid afternoon for another, depending on your global location. And in the UK it is Wednesday when it is Sunday in Australia. And they celebrate Christmas in June. And Americans drive on the wrong side of the road.
I mention these important details in case they are relevant.
|
02-18-08 02:18pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Glad you mentioned about the '29 day' thing. I've been stung by that too, when I was convinced I'd worked out my calendar correctly (I mean, dir, how hard is it to count 30 days!). And I always included the day I joined, even if that was 11.57pm or whatever. So as you said, it must be a time zone thing, i.e. I'd joined at say, 2am, but the time zone put me at 11pm the previous day, or something.
Twice I have cancelled on the 'last day', only to have been billed again for another month! So now, when I join a site, I always get it cancelled within a few days. It's not the odd day I quibble about - it's the extra month's fee!
|
02-18-08 02:12pm
|
Reply
120
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
daveboy's Reply
So, if a guy has the right kind of voice, you 'love' it?
I'm assuming you're not gay, so I'll just resign myself to total confusion, and leave it at that.
|
02-17-08 03:30pm
|
Reply
121
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
daveboy's Reply
I know what you mean about design, Dave - but when I said 'design' I was thinking more in terms of navigation and layout, rather than cosmetics.
But you're right, design comes a far second place to actual content.
As for that camp guy's voice making you 'feel like you could be there holding the lights', I'm sure that's not what most of us fantasise about when we watch porn (not that I'm criticising you). If it were a female director, then for me that would be a whole different thing. But none of my fantasies involve the sound of a camp guy - any guy for that matter - in my ear. That's my biggest issue with the site. To be fair, judging from other comments, I reckon I'm in a minority with this opinion.
|
02-17-08 07:40am
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Not the most interesting of polls this. Not exactly sure what we're meant to gain from this, but for the record I answered 'weekday/night' as it tends to be night when I watch porn, and I'm more likely to be home weekday nights.
|
02-17-08 07:32am
|
Reply
123
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
daveboy's Review
Gotta say, I find a score of 90 way too high for a site with such poor content, bad site design, and a bloke with a camp voice that talks all over the movies. Just my opinion though, glad you enjoyed it. :)
|
02-16-08 06:19am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I have tried a few, and been ripped off. Once I wasted several minutes (and British Pounds) on a girl that just ignored my every request. I complained to their customer support, and was just told "You can't order the girls to do stuff, they're not robots!" But I was being perfectly polite, but she just ignored me! So, fair enough, i just never went back again. Their loss. (Unfortunately I can't remember which one it was).
On the other hand the best one IMO is Streamate (and there are probably other websites that are clones of this and take the same cam 'feeds').
You will find girls on here that genuinely CUM - I mean proper thick creamy white girl-cum that pours from their pussies; not piss from the urethra that so-called 'squirt' sites have.
See my review for it. I like Cams.com also, but I find Streamate the best value, because for a cheap monthly fee you have access to ALL the recorded shows on the site! It is also full of gorgeous filthy girls that are also responsive to your requests. And for as little as $2 a minute.
If anyone can recommend another as good as this (and the same value) I would love to hear about it.
|
02-15-08 01:01pm
|
Reply
125
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
Reply of
matyko's Reply
Thanks Matyko, your reply was much appreciated. I am certain that the site will improve greatly, judging by your positive response. I wish all webmasters/customer support were as positive as you have been.
I look forward to visiting the site again at a later date once the upgrades are in place. With this in mind, I shall delay my full review until then.
Once again, thanks for your friendly response. This means a lot to customers.
Regards
Davit
|
02-15-08 12:45pm
|
|
