| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
But I don't even want it, Drooler! It hasn't been updated since December, and I have really lost all interest in the site. If it were Club Sandy, or Sapphic Erotica, or a great lesbian site then that would be another matter - and I certainly wouldn't shout about it round here *wink*!
One advantage of the free membership is, I can keep checking back for updates, and keep Porn Users informed as to when it bothers to update.
Keep watching my Eve Angel review for updates!
|
01-20-08 04:08am
|
Reply
152
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I know, my friend. Actually, at this time (or at least last week when I left) Mya's was fully up to date. But Eve's and Lora's are appalling. At least Eve's seems to update *eventually* and backdate the uploads for the missing period.
Not sure if the Club Sandy vid is better quality or not - I didn't bother to re-download it. I doubt it though. Both sites seem to have identical movie quality (i.e. about average).
I'm about to write a review of Eve's site. You know, I actually left a couple of months ago after one month's membership, and got my email confirming I had left and would not be re-billed - and yet I still have full access! I only discovered this when I got an email from customer service saying someone had breached my login details, and sent me a new password!
I replied straight back to say I had cancelled my membership, so it should not be active - but got no reply. So I sent a second email. Still no reply, and the membership is still active! This would be a great thing, if it weren't for the fact that the site hardly updates anyway, and when it does it always seems to be yet another Eve solo set, which never seem as good as Eve's movies on other sites. So it just shows you how bad it is when ex-members don't even want it for free!
|
01-20-08 03:48am
|
Review
153
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Beautiful European babes
-Reasonably sized archive is good value when purchased with Porn Users discount
-Whilst not hi-res, the movies are still acceptable quality, and very well shot
-Zipped pic sets available in 2 resolution sizes
-Excellent 'Pix & Videos' style site, with great navigation via calendar, model search or genre search
-Full site browsing access prior to membership
-Large proportion of Mya solo material |
| Cons: |
-Movies all appear to have been split into small sections, then glued back together again for this site - they fade out and back in every 2 minutes or so, which can be distracting
-Lesbian archive is not as big as it seems on casual inspection - 95% of lesbian movies are featured on the site in two halves, on two separate calendar days
-Not 100% exclusive. There's a movie I recognised from Club Sandy, and others have commented on other non-exclusive material here
-Large proportion of Mya solo material |
| Bottom Line: |
My first thought upon seeing this site was "Cripes, I didn't know Joan Rivers did porno - and what a body she's been hiding all these years!". On closer inspection I realised this was look-alike Mya Diamond. And whilst her facial features are not entirely to my tastes, browsing the calendar prior to joining the site showed me the nice array of friends featured here, which convinced me - at the Porn Users discount price - to take the plunge.
Using the brilliant navigation and aided by a download manager, I was able to firstly target all the lesbian content - 18 movies in all by the time I left last week - as well as an assortment of solo genres I enjoy (mainly ass-related).
There is, naturally, a large proportion of Mya solo material here. She also features in 12 of the 18 lesbian movies I downloaded during my membership. As with Eve Angel's site, focusing so much on one girl does have the potential to get boring quickly unless you really do have a particular insatiable lust for that girl - but this is the whole (or at least the main) point of these sites - to focus heavily on one star girl, and in that regard this site fits the bill.
There does seem to be an issue of less-than 100% exclusivity. I personally only found one movie/pic set that I had previously seen (on Club Sandy), but even so, there is no excuse for recycling, given the money these sites make.
Not worth full price - but undoubtedly fine value at the PU discount, for a month. |
|
01-20-08 03:27am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
154
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Re Mya Diamond.com. Yeah, I have just come across (no pun intended) a vid and pic set of Mya and Sandy, which I had already got from Club Sandy. So this is clearly not a 100% exclusive site.
So far it seems to be updating on time - unlike Eve Angel's or Lora Craft's sites, which nowadays seem to update when they feel like it, if at all.
|
01-20-08 02:51am
|
Review
155
|
Pix and Video
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Gorgeous European babes in solo, lez, b/g action
-Large archive
-Regular updates - 1 movie + 1 pic set everyday
-Easy navigation via calendar and model search
-No DRM
-Allows download manager |
| Cons: |
-much of the content is not exclusive, and appears on other 21 Sextury sites in higher res than here
-movies are in poor resolution by today's standards |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is certainly well worth a visit for a month, and there is some wonderful material here.
I couldn't put my score in the 90s though - that would suggest near-perfect, and this site is still short of that.
Firstly, if you have ever taken out the 'Porn Pass For All' option on 21 Sextury sites (membership to several select sites in a single subscription), you will recognise many of the movies here from those sites - only in lower resolution here. Which brings me to my next small gripe.
The movie quality is generally quite poor. I actually usually quite like the resolution on most 21 Sextury (and affiliated or similar) sites, like Club Sandy or Eve Angel or Dirty 101. They're not the greatest resolution, but they're still sufficient, and the content and production quality usually more than makes up for it. But Pix And Video seems to have even lower res. Having said that, the action is still such that there is much to prefer in these movies to many so-called 'HD' ones.
This is still a well above-average site. I joined for the lesbian and solo content alone, which is as red hot as you will see anywhere. If you like b/g stuff too (which I personally don't) - or if you've not been a member of too many 21 Sextury sites before (which I personally have!) - then this will be even better value for you. Either way, worth its fee for one month. |
|
01-19-08 06:23pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
156
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
Have to agree about SE getting worse in recent months. Whilst the technical quality (resolution, picture quality) is better than the vast majority of sites out there (even better than many so-called HD sites), the content has become dull. I think the webmaster has taken his eye off the ball for a while.
Still, it's worth a month's fee to get all the archive, which is still mostly brilliant stuff, very reminiscent of what we see from Viv Thomas.
|
01-19-08 05:44pm
|
Reply
157
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Agree with much of your review of SE, Goldfish. This was my first pay site too. I would add though, that whilst many of the older movies are lower res, they are often some of the best quality action.
Probably my favourite movie from the whole site is the threeway between Johanna, Kellie and Nina (who I've discovered goes by the name of Lucy Lee elsewhere). This is quite low res by today's standards, but have you ever seen 3 babes so into each other's bodies as those three!
Conversely, I find some of the newer movies to be very decent res and widescreen, but the action is often dull by comparison.
Nevertheless, it's still one of my fave sites for hot yet sensual lesbo action. Hard to beat.
Regards. Davit.
|
01-19-08 05:38pm
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
You get what you pay for. Trying to find worthwhile stuff for free is like searching for a needle in a haystack. And you're also risking all manner of viruses and spyware. The free sites also tend to be very dishonest. Links often will not lead you to where they claim to - often they just lead to more links, that open in more windows, and before you know it, you have about 10 windows open behind the one you are viewing.
The tube style sites are so rubbish that I'm sure the only people that get anything out of them are horny teenage lads that can't yet access the credit card authorisation sites.
There's enough pay sites that are utter rubbish, without me wasting more time with free ones!
|
01-19-08 04:22pm
|
Reply
159
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
Hi mate
You say 'Sandy doesn't do hardcore anymore'. I noticed many people regard any porn that doesn't include a guy to be somehow not hardcore.
Isn't this a little sexist? Surely if a girl indulges in cunnilingus, anilingus, tribbing, dildo fucking, etc etc, with another girl, this is hardcore too?
Maybe I have my definition wrong!
Still, great review man.
Regards
Davit
|
01-19-08 12:36pm
|
Reply
160
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
The context I was writing in, was one of someone who appreciates good porn (as I see it of course - we can only speak for ourselves). I like to review music also. The fact that I don't consider porn or music to have the same importance as world politics (and clearly they don't!) does not mean I therefore paid little care to my review.
I happily corrected the mistake that you quite rightly pointed out. But everyone makes mistakes. Don't use my honesty in admitting that one error as a stick to beat me with, regarding my reviews in general!
As for that voice - I didn't say it was yours. Are you saying that you are the guy whose voice is on there? Why is it relevant whether I would consider it to be alto or bass or whatever? The only issue I had was that it *sounds* gay. I know the guy (you?) is NOT gay. I didn't use the term 'gay' as an insult either (I have no interest in homophobia, and find homophobics to be pathetic) - and I know you didn't accuse me of that, but I think it's important to clarify the point. But I still don't like to hear male voices - or worse still, gay-sounding male voices - in my porn videos.
I think it was valid to mention this in my review - I know from reading many other porn reviews in the past, that a dislike of male voices in all-girl porn films is not unique to me, so is a point of interest to potential subscribers.
Kind regards.
|
01-19-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
161
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
Hi Posterdude
I appreciate your opinion, but I can only speak from my own. We're all different, and will all have varying opinions. That's what makes user review sites like this so good.
There's no need for personal insults if you disagree - just say why you disagree (which is fair enough), and leave it at that!
Regards
Davit
|
01-19-08 12:08pm
|
Reply
162
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
You're entitled to your view, Robare, I'm entitled to mine. I'm not sure how you got onto 'faking urination'. I didn't think that existed! Relax - you sound very angry, and there's really no need - it was just one opinion! (And I'll let you into a secret - we're only discussing porn here, not world politics - you don't need to get so worked up about it!)
|
01-17-08 10:28am
|
Reply
163
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
We all know what the word 'amateur' literally means - but I think what the term means when applied to porn is 'amateur *looking*' - in other words, 'girl next door' image, simple but effective production/direction (often one or two cameramen filming in a bedroom) and a generally unpretentious look. That's my take anyway - I'm probably completely wrong!
|
01-17-08 10:21am
|
Reply
164
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
1 inch in diameter? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ;)
|
01-14-08 01:49pm
|
Reply
165
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Forgot to mention, PP - I know they are clearly labelled as to whether they are photo shoots or whatever - that wasn't the point of my comment.
And the talking thing - he definitely talks in most non-photo shoot vids. I know it's generally not much - but just the occasional sound of his voice is still surely not a pleasant experience for the vast majority of viewers. Does anyone actually think it's a good thing? I suspect that most people who sign up to an all-girl site are people who really *really* would not want to hear a male voice in their porn vids at all, never mind occasionally. I reckon that's fair to say.
|
01-13-08 12:45pm
|
Reply
166
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Hi Robare - your point about me not mentioning American girls is valid - I'm about to amend my review. I didn't mean to mislead - it was an oversight, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. And while I find most American sites to feature annoyingly badly acting girls who can't shut up (!) I did actually find the Americans in this site to be generally much more natural.
If you think this was a negative review - you should hear my opinion on many sites that Porn Users don't feature. There are some dreadful ripoffs out there that I would struggle to give much more than zero, they're that bad, i.e. not delivering any of what is promised in the tour screens - just excuses to get an email address to send junk to!
So on balance, I reckon I gave Alsscan an above-average score.
One final point - you said you only saw one scene where the fluid 'might have been pee' - well, I can tell the difference, there's no 'might' about it! I know which hole pee comes out of, and what pee looks like, as opposed to girl cum. No offence intended.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
|
01-13-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
167
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Hi Pink Pantha, thanks for your reply mate. But I didn't think I was being inaccurate - if you notice I never suggested Alex actually was gay - I personally couldn't care less about someone's sexuality (I have gay friends like most people these days). I only said he *sounded* gay, which I think is fair to say - because he really does! Any male voice is not nice to hear on a site aimed at lesbian-loving hetro guys - but a gay-sounding one is even worse! Just my take on it.
|
01-13-08 12:18pm
|
Reply
168
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Review
Agree totally about the director talking to much, and the annoying voice. In fact, he sounds like a gay friend of mine (not what I need to hear in a lesbian porn movie).
And I agree the video content doesn't make it worth joining really. Many of the videos are not even proper porn movies - they are either filmed photo shoots are movies of the girls acting goofy on the beach or in the street, with that annoying guy shouting things to them.
Wish I'd taken more notice of your review before I joined.
Regards
Davit
|
01-12-08 06:51am
|
Review
169
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Nice European and American solo and lesbian girls
-The sex is good and hard
-No men (except for the director, whose voice features in most movies)
-Variety of set locations, inside and outside
-Range of movie sizes, up to HD for many
-Movies are reasonably filmed and edited
-No music soundtrack (always a good thing)
-Zipped picture sets |
| Cons: |
-A lot of fisting. If fisting isn't your favourite thing, this site may become boring fast
-Lots of movie downloads are just filmings of photo shoots - and anyone that has seen a photo shoot will know that the reality can be boring and show the falseness of the situation
-Many of the movies are just 'behind the scenes' features
-Some movies are not even porn - they are just naked girls in public locations acting goofy
-Entire photo sets are spread over several updates
-Male director talks during movies (that has lost 20 points alone). He also sounds gay, and I believe he is called Alex. (Yes, indeed.)
-Design/Navigation is terrible
-Proper porn movie content is not as huge as other similarly priced sites |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like lots of fisting in your solo or lesbian porn (and I'm sure many guys out there do), and like hearing a male voice giving instruction and encouragement to the girls, then I would recommend this site to you.
As well as the fisting content, there are a couple of nice tribbing scenes too, and most of the girls generally seem very convincing and genuinely enjoying the sex - although there are clearly some 'actors' here not genuinely getting off. There's some anal too - but not in most scenes. And there is some peeing that tries to pretend it is 'squirting' (does anyone really believe that?) as well as some honest peeing, and a few apparently genuine orgasms where white girl goo is seen oozing from the open pussy (although after a fisting session you can't be sure it's not just lube).
There are better looking sites out there, offering more variety with better navigation and bigger content - but if you are looking around for something new, and can cope with the negative points mentioned, it might just be worth a look.
Highly recommended to guys that enjoy hearing a male voice (and especially a gay-sounding one) talking while they wank. The score leaps to 85 for those people. |
|
01-12-08 06:07am
Replies (14)
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
And another thing. Most talking in porn is just relentless and boring: "Oh yeah, just like that, just like that, right there, right there, spit on it, oh yeah I'm cumming, right there, just like that. Oooh, look at that. Right there".
Who the hell enjoys listening to that crap?!
|
01-12-08 05:41am
|
Reply
171
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
The real question should be: are you convinced by the acting skills of most girls who talk during sex scenes?
My problem with talking is: it almost never sounds believable! It's always either over-the-top or completely lacking any real emotion. I think the only people who are convinced by it are guys that have never had a real girlfriend.
So, given that the majority of girls are terrible actors, I prefer them to just shut up!
|
01-12-08 05:25am
|
Reply
172
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Reply
You said 'best is an objective term'. For something like porn, that relies on personal tastes, I would suggest it is entirely subjective.
|
01-11-08 05:40pm
|
Reply
173
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Review
This looks good - I'm considering joining. Can't understand why you joined a lesbian site though, if you want to see naked men? You said you want to see more boy-girl stuff. If you want to see naked men, surely there are other sites...?
Regards
Davit
|
01-11-08 05:37pm
|
Reply
174
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
Well, I said I'd had enough of this topic but felt I had to comment as once again, we see laughably bad filming from 1 By Day.
I'm gonna carry on bringing this to the attention of potential customers until the webmaster acknowledges it and agrees to look into it. I'll be specific so it is clear I am not giving it BS.
The latest Julie Silver-Vanessa one. What the hell is going on? The cameraman has multiple opportunities to get some decent oral shots - and misses every one (except for the odd few seconds, literally)! There are times when the brunette is licking the blonde from behind, and the cameraman (shaky as ever) is filming from above her head, so you can see the top and side of her head OK, but that's not what we want to see in porn!
Then the blonde climbs on top in a 69. Just as the cameraman seems to get a potentially good angle - he moves away, and zooms out!!! What the fuck! And this goes on - he finds a reasonable angle for all of 3 seconds, then moves away! See how jerky the movements are? See how unnatural the editing is?
And this is NOT subjective. This is NOT personal taste. This is objectively pointing out the obvious! 1 By Day may have some decent cameramen - but they clearly have some absolutely useless ones too, and this movie is just one more example.
And when the blonde is facing the brunette on the bed and rubbing the blue dildo along the brunette's pussy - I would swear the cameraman is having a wank the way that camera jerks and shakes! Just watch - around 8min25. The instant the dildo makes contact, the cameraman has an epileptic fit! Eventually he zooms in again, and holds it - for about TWO SECONDS! Then there's another edit.
It seems to improve shortly after, with some good dildo ass-fucking - but not for long. Our friend with the camera can't keep still for more than a few seconds again. by this time, I'm so pissed off with how this guy ever got this work, I can't be bothered with the rest of the movie, and turn to something on my hard drive with a more professional look.
It's a shame - these girls are HOT and really sexy together. But wasted on any porn supplier that uses this cameraman.
|
01-06-08 05:05pm
|
Reply
175
|
Dirty Dykes
(0)
|
Reply of
SurfingGuru's Review
Hi SG. Just a comment in response to your review of Dirty Dykes. You mentioned that your ID didn't give you access to the bonus sites, if I read you correctly. I think this is because you were on the 7-day trial.
Even trials that offer so-called 'full unlimited access' will rarely include other bonus sites from the network in that offer (although that is never made clear of course!).
I've discovered that to my cost in the past.
Cheers
Davit
|
01-05-08 02:44pm
|
|
