| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
676
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
|
01-29-09 10:27pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
677
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Now this is a damn good review. Well done!
|
02-17-09 08:52pm
|
Reply
678
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
vavoyeur's Reply
Anything. I was a member about two years ago, but can not remember that much about it.
You need to give reasons for believing it is a good site. Check out some of the the other reviews here for this site and others and you will quickly see what I mean.
You can describe the site, the picture, and the videos. Tell us what it is you like about them. Tell us what improvements the site could make, all sites have a few things they could do. Besides, many site's webmaster check up on their reviews here.
|
01-22-09 02:34pm
|
Reply
679
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
vavoyeur's Review
So, is there anything you can say?
Four line reviews tend to get deleted since they do not tell anyone much of anything. So you may wish to add some detail or thought to this one.
|
01-22-09 02:12pm
|
Reply
680
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Let me know if you have nay questions about them, or many of the others on this forum could answer many of your questions. Once you start using them you will wonder how you every got by with out them, they make life so much easier, plus you will download more, faster!
|
04-04-08 09:44am
|
Reply
681
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Well there is a lot of things to choose from. It really would depend on if you are willing o pay for a program or want a freebie. My thinking is that if you are willing to pay $30 for a website you better be willing to pay that for a manager to download it. Also, it is sites like Karups that the managers are extremely useful, they can save you a lot of time and the need to babysit the computer while you are downloading. I let mine run 24/7 now! Using a manager it is possible for me download about 1 TB per month on a 3 MBit/s internet connection since they keep the downloads going all the time without me needing to be there.
What it breaks down to is personal preference. Go to download.com and look for a download manager. Try a few of them out, most let you try them out for free for a few weeks. Some will download and reconstruct entire website, scan for certain file types (videos, zips, etc.) and accelerate downloads by splitting downloads into several connects. Personal I use Internet Download Manager which has a free trial. I like it because it can schedule downloads. For example I am downloading from Bang Bros right now. It has been running with me watching it for more than a day, and downloading 4 videos at a time. When one is done it begins the next. I usually manually queue my downloads so that i get everything and do not end up missing things or downloading the same video twice. Some sites can be queued up in a matter of minutes, others take hours by manually grabbing the links, or I can let the program do all the work.
Keep in mind though that the managers are not intelligent. They will only do what you tell them to do. If you say download all the WMVs that is exactly what it will do. It will grab the full video and the chunks. Or can say all WMVs larger than say 300 MB, but if a video you want is 299.99 MB it will skip over it. So, they have their ups and downs. Another plus though is that most will allow you to pause the downloads and resume them later on, even days later.
If you have any specific questions please let me know. I would be glad to try to answer! :) Good luck!
|
04-01-08 04:52pm
|
Rating
682
|
Karup's PC
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
03-18-08 11:05pm
|
Reply
683
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
Oh, and yes. I did post a comment based on the amount of content I had downloaded last August. They were 206 GB total by that point. So it is not a small site at all. I was just hoping you or someone reading this had a more current number to throw out.
|
03-18-08 11:02pm
|
Reply
684
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
I guess I have been sold then! I will have to rejoin the site soon. Webmaster should thank you for a sale you know. A discount of something would be in order :)
|
03-18-08 10:59pm
|
Comment
685
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
03-18-08 10:41pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
686
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Okay. I can understand that! Then...how much has the content improved since last August? That is when I last was with them.
|
03-18-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
687
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
I must agree about the models here, they are pretty hot. Have you downloaded the whole site? If so, how large is it now, I am considering rejoining them in the near future.
|
03-18-08 08:06pm
|
Reply
688
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
Ricky D Product's Reply
"Better yet, maybe even sent to the company owner so he could fix your issues." Again read the transcript. I was dismissed right out of the gate. I practically had to break the guy's arm to get a refund that I should not have needed.
I never said that the girl's appearance was an issue. Correct, I am not a fan of tatoos but it is hard to avoid now with so many having them.
Yes, Twistys is ranked very high by me and for many reasons. One of which is their site is easy to get around. They also shoot quality and have been doing it longer.
As for the looks of the main girl herself no one can say anything about it other than a user should look at the main page before joining. That said I knew what she was going to look like before joining and decided $5 was worth a look. Yes, I prefer the "babe" look, but at times my mood is a little different and want something different. So while I may be a little bias I would spell out any bias I have that others may not share, but in this case I did not have bias toward the girl, just the site layout and quality.
I am typically not in your demographic, but then again most people are not. This is a smaller niche site and that is fine. Many of us here join those knowing they are small.
If it nothing you can get at bestbuy and yo have all this experience that speaks even worse for the site because it does not show! The pictures are small, and a lot of the videos are very sub par in quality. Some of the videos do look okay media wise, I will give the site that.
"Reviewers like you are the reason sites do limited trials and why the smaller producers are nearly gone." Why, do they feel they need to hide behind limited trials? Is it because they know they do not have much to offer and do not want to show their hand until after we pay the full price? Or is it something to do with the site being able to be downloaded in under two hours?
I have given good reviews to extremely small sites when they offer something unusual.
The trouble is that you are getting away from the main topic. I have a terrible time canceling this site. Perhaps that is what need to be addressed. I can see that you share the same style of customer service as the payment processor does.
|
12-19-10 10:56am
|
Reply
689
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
Ricky D Product's Reply
"...but with false reviews like these..."
So are you denying the transcript posted in the forum?
I did not put down the site for not being large like some of the other. I have been around the porn block a few time, I know what is out there. I did not go in expecting 5000 GB of HD stuff. I was looking for something other than a bunch of webcam recording and POV content. It comes off as very amateur, something anyone could do with a HD camera from bestbuy a guy and a girl.
I have done a number of reviews here so people have gotten to know my style and get a feel for what I look for. Those looking for the same thing will not like your site, thus should avoid it. Others look for different things and may like it, and since they know they feel differently about certain things it may not affect their decision to join. We are just trying to get the facts out and voice own own opinions whether others agree with them or not is up to them.
"We've never had any issues with members canceling their memberships..." we you have now had at least one. The link at the bottom of the pages directed me to epoch, not who I signed up through.
Lastly, those members who have been around since 2007 for this tiny site would likely not be taken too seriously. They obviously have an extreme bias and we strive for unbiased reviews here because those are the kind that help us.
|
12-18-10 09:39pm
|
Comment
690
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
|
12-18-10 11:54am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
691
|
Kelle Marie
(0)
|
Reply of
autumnale's Review
Smells like a decent review for a first timer. Beef up the Bottom Line a little and PU staff will give you 2 point for this. You put some really good information in this one.
Nice job.
|
01-03-09 10:59pm
|
Comment
692
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
|
|
03-20-10 09:23pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
693
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Reply
Well then I guess I wont be joining, I us IDM too. At least they gave you a refund, I would have expected that especially after a few weeks. I was just wondering if anyone else ever had issues with this. Im sorry, I find this very hard not to laugh about, they actually kicked you out for good just for using a manager?!?! haha
Curious, did you queue the downloads manually or did you use the site grabber or batch downloader? These are the things they might be trying to prevent. Matts Models kicked me off (15 minutes) because I used the batch to grab the photo zips. They said I had an unrealistic number of page openings in a short period of time. These programs can make a server think an account has been hacked and being used by many people at one time...bad for business.
|
04-17-08 03:25pm
|
Reply
694
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
Can anyone else confirm this??
|
04-08-08 04:58pm
|
Reply
695
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This explains the idea pretty well. It has been a year since I read the terms, and yes I did actually read them. I truly can see what you mean. It is kinda like me eating hamloaf, it is only good when it is free. It is not something I would pay for. Free things always seem better, but unfortunately there are not many free porn sites that are worth the page space they would take to even type in here.
I was not trying to be argumentative, I just had not though this issue through as well as you guys apparently have. As I frequently say, you guys have thought of everything!
Simple solution. Next time time one of us asks something like this, instead of explaining it in length just say "because I fuckin said so!" It is so much more dramatic and would act as a reminder to read the terms and rule every now and then. Speaking of which... Seriously though, thanks for the explanation. Your philosophy on this makes perfect sense.
|
03-13-09 08:31pm
|
Reply
696
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Even to a site that normal does charge? I understand that there are no reviews to things such as TGPs. I only mention this as a special circumstance. The idea was to have a trust worthy, usual member here have a chance to poke around this site and construct a review of the actual content without having to fork over the membership money.
I can understand as well not wanting people to have free access in exchange for writing reviews. I had not thought of this before, you guys think o everything! I can see it being very hard to write an objective review for someone after they gave free access. Plus I would want to know that people were not being paid off for writing less than truthful reviews to boost the site.
Although I think in this special case it may be appropriate, I can certainly live with your decision after figuring out for myself why you do not want them. You should have explained why exactly you do not allow this in your reply, but that is okay I figured it out, I think. If I am wrong about why please let me know!
|
03-13-09 02:53pm
|
Reply
697
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I 100% agree with this. As I always say, you guys seem to get everything right around here when it comes to these decisions. I was hoping all of our work would not get deleted, there is some good stuff there.
|
03-12-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
698
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
That is what I am worried about. Sometimes it can be better to be known as a site that has fake reviews written by site operators or "end of the Earth" fans than to not be known at all. I just hope that people looking for this type of site take the time to look at all the comments and replies to the reviews.
The site might be good, I honestly can not comment there. And that is exactly the problem, after all these recent reviews I still can not even speculate on the quality of the site because the reviews are not usable. I was hoping out of al of this to at least have one good, solid review come from someone who has been there on their own accord and can give us some honest perspective. But I certainly would not ask any of our members to pay the site simply to have that review.
Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review. I say it would have to be someone that has been a member here for at least a few months and more than 20 positive trust votes. This way it would well established that these reviews would have the user's best interest in mind. If the site is not worth joining people need to know, and it very well could be that the site lives up to all the hype. I for one am not going to pay them just to satisfy my ever so slight curiosity.
As for PU getting abused. We can abuse them back. Besides I am sure if this abusive shill reviewing gets out of hand the staff will take addition measures. One perhaps being to mandate for this site the review must have a score of 5 or so and must fill out at least half of the personal question in their profile. This is just one idea, but I am sure they have their methods.
|
03-12-09 08:13pm
|
Reply
699
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I was thinking about the same thing, but I do not think they deserve our money at this point.
|
03-12-09 02:07pm
|
Reply
700
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Reply
How long would it take to simply look for us? Also, there is no reason to jump all over us over typos. We can all appreciate getting you jollies from whatever does it for you, but a lot of us are collectors as much as we are pervs. So we really want to know that is on the site.
|
03-12-09 02:05pm
|
