| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nickdv's Review
So many people on here talking about how this site scams people and they just keep coming! This is one way to learn to check sites out before paying them. I have found out the hard way also.
May the Porn God crush Incredible Pass like a bug!
|
05-07-08 09:07am
|
Reply
652
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
The Ant Dog's Comment
And yet another victim!
|
05-05-08 10:30pm
|
Reply
653
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
PaulCS's Reply
If that is truly the case I believe you need to do a lot of work here to rebuild your shattered reputation! Please tell us why so many people end up paying for numerous other items when signing up for your site?
|
04-28-08 02:50pm
|
Reply
654
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Ronzo's Comment
You are one among many that have been ripped off by them. Good luck to you and do not forget to check up on sites before you join them, whether it be here or somewhere else. If you look at this site's page on this forum you will find many people have issued warnings about this site, including myself.
Lesson learned: these guys are ass holes, and you need to do a little homework before joining sites. This will help keep your from getting burned again in the future!
|
04-27-08 06:43pm
|
Reply
655
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
bjorn7's Reply
Well, I dont know if I could go that far, they do have a large and extremely fast website. There are things here that other sites could model after. On the other hand it makes no difference how much content you have and how fast the connections are if everyone is afraid to join. The people who run the site need to come out and admit to their wrongs and prevent them from continuing, otherwise this could end up sinking them. What are they going to do with 200 GB of exclusive videos if no one trusts them enough to be able to download them?
It is every site makers dream to have a forum raving about their site, but I am sure this is not what the people at incredible pass had in mind. I feel that a pretty strong message is being delivered here, just hope they get it!
|
03-29-08 10:03pm
|
Reply
656
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Reply
Unfortunately, I have no idea if they even look on this forum or not. They have not voiced any concern about the comments being made, so I would assume they are not looking. I guess they are too busy finding other ways to get cross sales from unsuspecting users.
|
03-29-08 09:56pm
|
Reply
657
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I have had another site do that to me as well, but I can not remember who it was, if I do I will post it. This is like paying for a month's rent at the first of the month and telling the land lord that you wont be there next month. Then he telling you that you have to be out tomorrow since you dont plan on paying for the next month's rent and not allowing you to finish out the whole month you paid for.
They do not want to give you anything if they think they will get no more from you. Plus it is easy to forget to cancel a membership by a certain day a few weeks after finishing a site, so they are hoping you will forget until a few days after and get to charge again!
|
03-29-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
658
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I must agree with this. I wish I had read the reviews before joining. I feel bad for giving them 10 bucks. I just hope my bandwidth usage cost more than the membership fee that they charge people extra!
|
03-29-08 09:45pm
|
Comment
659
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
|
03-28-08 04:58pm
Replies (11)
|
Reply
660
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
That is a very good point that I forgot about. Credit card processors only allow a certain number of charge backs per month to a vendor before they either fine them or boot them off. This is to prevent people from consistent ripping people off. This is why more vendors want to refund your money rather than make you fight it. They hate to see the money go, but it is better than having a large number of charge backs. It is a mechanism to help protect customers.
The issue here is that I am not sure if all the charges come from the same company. The cross sales could come from different account to protect the company from the results of fraud prevention.
Thank you asmith for this comment post. I am glad it has been said, only sorry I did not think to post it earlier.
|
03-25-08 08:47pm
|
Reply
661
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I hope so too. I did not notice the warning until after I join, stupid me. But I am glad people said something about i because I was begining to wonder about a few emails I had received, so this site gave confirmation to what I was suspecting.
I also hope that they had to pay a premium on the 150 GB I downloaded, maybe it put them over their usage for the month or something.
|
03-22-08 09:37pm
|
Comment
662
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
|
03-21-08 09:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
663
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I must say that it is not true anyway. I did not do my homework on this site before joining, though this site by the way. I was charged extra for joining this site, and that was this past Sunday night. The site is very large and runs very fast and easy, but I do agree with avoiding it based on principal. The do rip people off, and it is fraud. The only reason I download from the site was to at least make them pay for the bandwidth usage, I am sure that 150 GB in 6 hours is not cheap to maintain. I felt a need to rip them off just as they did to me and many others now. It is too bad this site could not be bought out by an honest porn lover, instead it is run by people as evil as the oil executives who rape us every time we drive to work.
They need to clean up their act. There are good things to say about this site, but I do not want to say them without saying "DONT JOIN!"
|
03-21-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
664
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Understandable, it is pretty easy to mix them up if you read through quickly. Besides, I was looking for an excuse to let that out because I know there are people who do not know the difference but do not want to be the person to ask. You know what they say about assumptions though!! :)
I certainly wish I could get those kind of speeds. It would make porn browsing much easier, but I dont think webmasters would approve of people being able to download their content in a matter of minutes, I have made enough of them mad the way it is!
The problem with standards is that not everyone uses the same standards, liters and gallons for example. So I find it best just to not be lazy and type the whole thing out. Just like "lol" means laugh out load to many people, but I might say lol thinking lesbians on lust. Okay, maybe that is stretching it, but you get the point.
|
03-20-08 08:55pm
|
Reply
665
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Read carefully everyone! It was 70 Mbit/s and I always spell it out for exactly this reason, not to pick on you JD1961. Perhaps you know this already, but for anyone who does not: there is a ratio of 8:1 between the two, so just under 10 MBytes/s if you prefer to see it that way. And yes that number is correct, I always run a program called Bandwidth Monitor at continuously displays the bandwidth in and out. Although, now the site is running at 60 MBit/s
I am always wondering if people get the too mixed up. I understand that many people do not know the relation between a bit and a byte. The simple way to put is that 1 byte equals 8 bits for almost any application. So the new videos people are talking about being shot in 8 MBit video is equal to 1 MByte/s
If someone tells you 70 MBytes/s they are more than likely stupid! My fastest hard drive can sustain writing 77 MByte/s using SATA 2. So a website outputting that much to one user would be insane!
I truly believe that people should not abbreviate Mbps and MBs, because it gets mixed up alot. It should be spelled out to avoid the mess.
|
03-20-08 10:00am
|
Comment
666
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
|
03-20-08 08:37am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
667
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
scanner's Comment
Sorry man! I have had the same issue. I was signed up for a 1 dollar trial to a site that was from a totally different company! I cancelled that, but I am waiting on my credit card statement to update and show these charges to make sure everything is right. I also unselected the optional sites and was still signed up for at least 1 other. This IS fraud and can and should be prosecuted!
Please be careful of this when joining this site. There is some decent content, but be very warned it is risky.
I hope things work out for you scanner! Keep use informed of how this turns out.
|
03-18-08 08:12pm
|
Reply
668
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
hla8002's Review
This is true! Right after joining I got a notice of a charge using the same username and password for a trial of another site with would rebill at $40 per month! The site was localnakedbabes.com. This site was a pain to cancel a well!
Thank you for that warning, I will be keeping a close eye on my credit card for a while. I was suspicious after the automatic trial that was unsolicited and actually billed by a different company. LNB-Services.
|
03-17-08 09:38pm
|
Reply
669
|
Innocent Eve
(0)
|
Reply of
Chipster's Comment
Had not noticed this before. Nice catch there.
|
11-10-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
670
|
Irina 18
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
They do it because 100 sites sounds good. Also I would think the girls they have like the idea of having "their own" site. Of course no one really believes 3 videos and 2 picture galleries constitutes a site.
|
06-01-09 05:23pm
|
Reply
671
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nbaby8's Reply
I see. Then I am not sure I could call this a con for this site. This would seem like a con on the service provider for the area. The site can not push the data through any faster than the weakest point in the transmission line. The fastest site in the world will be just as slow as anything else if you are using dial up....just an example.
|
06-09-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
672
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nbaby8's Review
Download speeds are always dependent on where you are. You can not expect 20 MBit off dialup, or somewhere that can not offer it. Or, are you trying to say they throttle bandwidth to people in certain locations? Please elaborate.
|
05-26-08 08:45am
|
Comment
673
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
|
04-12-12 04:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
674
|
Just Nude
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Full access trial, 3 days
Still updating
Zips for photo sets
Most photo sets have 3 size options
Pictures have Hi-Res option, up to 4000
Many great looking models
No download limit
No DRM
Watermark is small and out of way
Some girl-girl shoots, but could use more
Site very simple, you can not get lost
Videos look very nice, hires and high bit rate
Several video options as well
Use CCBill, I prefer them |
| Cons: |
File named only by gallery number
Trial a bit expensive at $10
Needs many more videos, only 18
First month is expensive if joining without using trial
The girl-girl shoots are dubbed under each models name
Videos are of photo shoots only |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are a fan of nude art or softcore photo shoots than this place is well worth a look. It is a lot like Met-Art, so if you enjoy their stuff than join this one and forget about the rest of this review.
The photos are of a very high quality and really bring out the beauty in the models. They scale nicely too, so do not worry about them looking worse as the size decreases to match your screen, you can even go larger if you like....in case you want to look into her eyes of course! :)
The site is still growing since the last review was posted. The now have 482 photo galleries and 18 videos. Now keep in mind that a the number of unique galleries is lower but still well over 400, when they have two or more models in the shoot they assign a new gallery for each one and do not mention this.
The videos look stunning. They do vary a bit in quality, but most are of two qualities. Some are 768x576 at 6 MBit and some are 1280x720 at 8 MBit. The videos are mostly outdoors. In parks, by water, near statues, and one is even one a large pile of tires by a small skating park! I knew I should have gone to the park that day! The duration of the videos is between 6 to 15 minutes with most of them being about 10 minutes.
Many of the photo shoots feature the model already nude when it starts. Some do start clothed, but many times when they do it is only partially clothed which can be erotic in itself. i wish more of the shoots would start clothed.
The number of photos in each shoot varies anywhere between 20 and 80. It seems like they cut out only what they feel is the best. I usually like having as many photos as was taken, but I can understand this would require a huge amount of space since many of the photos are over 6 MB a piece.
Speaking of size again.
Photos - 482 files - 34.8 GB
Videos - 18 files - 4.6 GB - 2 hr 50 min
So as you can see the site is about 40 GB which makes it easily downloadable with in a month, or the three day trial. But it certainly is large enough to warrant joining.
If you enjoy outdoor photography with great looking younger women showing the beauty of several aspects of nature that this site is for you. This site has made my "join again" list and would do the same for any picture fan. If you are only after videos than this may not be the place for you.
If you intend on joining use the trial. Even if you intend on staying for a month, use the trial. If you join straight up you pay $30 and get 30 days. If you use the trial first you pay $30 and get 33 days since the site recurs at $20 instead of the initial $30. Plus if you are not satisfied in the first 3 days you can just cancel then and pay only the first $10 for the trial. |
|
02-18-09 08:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
675
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I just joined late last night. So I will be doing a full review shortly with actual statistics.
So far it is heavily photo based. Definitely a photo art site. Wll say now that the newer videos look really nice at 5000 KBit.
|
01-30-09 12:45pm
|
