| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
It does work just as he said. If you download it you get to try it out, it works like a tour page with movie downloads that do not show the how movie. I will tell you though that you cant move the girl around the screen and it can get in the way at times. It also sucks system resources, sometimes a little too much. Personally I have had a lot of problems with my copy of it. I have had to redownload it a few times. It is pretty cool, but it sucks that once you cancel you lose anything you did not pay extra for....so it is find like a DRM movie, you lose it unless you pay more. The concept it cool, but they should let us keep the stuff that is downloaded in my opinion.
|
03-27-08 10:45am
|
Comment
1052
|
Wacky Jugs
(0)
|
|
01-30-09 01:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1053
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Writing a letter is not so bad, calling them on the phone is great fun. It is ALWAYS a woman when it has to do with porn, and it is NEVER about a site like Playboy or something that sounds fairly normal. And she always says it in the tone of voice my principal used back in 2nd grade when I did something wrong, bit with more of the "you are one sick bastard" inflection.
|
05-30-11 05:49pm
|
Reply
1054
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
But the site "Midgets blowing horse cock" shows up all caps, bold, and in color!
By the way, I honestly have no idea if a site names that exists. And NO, it is tucked away in my porn library.
|
05-30-11 07:23am
|
Reply
1055
|
Watch My GF
(0)
|
Reply of
dieingslowly's Comment
Did this site specifically rip you off?
|
04-15-10 06:06pm
|
Reply
1056
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is a pretty good review Exotics! You give some pretty good insght.
By the way. I did download every single video, and damn glad I did! They certainly will not be in recycle bin.
|
07-21-08 05:40pm
|
Review
1057
|
We Live Together
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Models look absolutely wonderful!
-Updates weekly on Thursday
-Loads of scenes so far
-Full access to a huge network of sites
-Price is decent, $25
-Videos are long, around 45 minutes average
-Exclusive content
-Site navigation is pretty simple
-Zips for photo sets
-Loads of lesbians! Damn I love lesbians! |
| Cons: |
-DOWNLOAD LIMIT- All sites
-The videos are sub-par looking
-Photos are small, 900x600
-Older videos are in chunks only
-Some people might like more download file types |
| Bottom Line: |
This section of the network is great, so make sure you check it out. I am a huge fan of lesbians and that is what this one is about. There are a huge amount of threesomes and more! All the girls are good looking and some are absolutely stunning.
The video are like the rest of the network and need a lot of clarity work. The bit rate is around 1.2 MBit/s depending on the video. There are 250 currently and you would need 60 GBs to hold them all. The resolution varies a bit from terrible up to 720x480, but the bitrate just does not support a great looking video. Do not get me wrong though, the content of the videos is awesome.
The photos are a lame size here. 900x600 is the best is gets, but they look nice for the size. They need to work on that a bit, but keep in mind it is a video site. Older photos are just screens, but newer ones are actual photos, so they really should be better.
I would give this site a higher score if they could catch up on visual clarity. The content is great and I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in a couple chicks meeting another girl and then banging her lights out! They have a nice theme and offer good amount of lead up to the sex, this is typical for the whole network.
By itself this site is worth the membership, the rest of the sites are a huge added bonus. Hell, there is over 175 HOURS of video already and it is still growing! |
|
07-21-08 05:36pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1058
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
|
06-25-11 09:01am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1059
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Usually you can figure it would from looking at replies to your reviews. The person that seems hostile towards your comments is usually the person it ends up being.
Without doing some creative digging, and a lot of it, I do not think even the staff can tell you who it was. If I recall correctly I believe they said some time ago that the anonymous ID is saved in a one way encryption to protect the privacy. I believe it was the trusts they were talking about.
In any event, it does not hurt to guess who it was and send a reply to them. Even if they have not been around for a while they could still get the notice email for receiving a reply. This might bring them back, you never know and it certainly does not hurt. Besides, who wants that one bad trust thing floating around.
|
07-11-09 11:12pm
|
Reply
1060
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Okay, I just really wanted to be sure about this. Thanks for the reply. Do you have any idea who the "NO' trust came from. One of the things a few of us have been trying to do lately is getting people who voted no a while back to reconsider in the even the user has improved reviews since the NO trust and is still around. Anyway, you may want to add an extra reply to that trust just to make it clear.
|
07-11-09 07:14pm
|
Reply
1061
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
This may or may not pertain to this review, but I need to ask you something.
I was just looking around and for no reason clicked on your name. I noticed you had a single "NO" trust and I was curious as to what it was for. The person believed you did not join some of the sites you had reviewed. You replied saying "I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned for at least one month. No review based on a trial m'ship."
Is this statement implying that you had not joined them two of them, or simply that you joined and left before a second month. The distinction is very important. If you had not joined them how could you review them? Also, which of the nine sites DID you join? At this point I think it is just poor choice of wording, but it is unclear.
I am a little reluctant to throw out a "NO" trust on you because your more recent reviews seem much more in depth and honest. I would like some clarification on this just in case there is a misunderstanding. It was not that long ago a reviewer had all his review points removed and was semi-suspended for implying that he did not join sites he had reviewed. I do not want this to happen to you, but I (all of PU) need to know that you have actually joined all the sites you have reviewed.
|
07-11-09 12:45am
|
Reply
1062
|
X Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
deadelvis's Comment
It would be nice to know that this is there, but most people that research a website through TBP or other review sites are usually willing and know to take their time when joining and check for these things.
We all get burned, at least once, on these things and we learn a lesson very quickly.
As for being "in pay" with the webmasters....of course they are. The guys here at PU and TBP have to get paid somehow, and it is by getting us to join websites. Every time i join a site though PU/TBP they get a small kickback. Now, I can not comment on the extra checkbox sites. i would assume though that TBP does not see that kickback, but rather the site you are signing up for, or the billing processor gets that money.
It would be hard for TBP to track all of these since they can change from day to day very quickly. Plus, most sites have more than one method of joining.
|
11-10-08 09:25pm
|
Reply
1063
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
At this point I still avoid the 12,000 Mbit videos unless the scene is just amazing. I do not shy from large files but 10 GB for a video can not be justified when my monitor is 1080p anyway, so the 2 GB looks the same but plays better.
|
02-02-16 08:02pm
|
Reply
1064
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
What you are seeing is the difference between a 12,000 kbit video vs a 8,500 kbit video.
Xart 610 MB for 9:42 at 1920x1088 (yes 1088)
Brazzers 3,220 MB for 36:36 at 1920x1080
In watching a very samples of each I can tell that Brazzers has some better looking videos in regards to sharpness. Xart does not look like SD, or what I would call low definition at this point.
|
01-17-16 05:58pm
|
Reply
1065
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
See, that is just it. I can not tell you about new stuff yet. I will likely be joining them soon and I will be glad to let you know then.
Or if anyone reading this has been a recent member it would be really easy to figure out. All we need to do is list a few model names, find a few that are the same, and make a quick description of the beginning of a scene. If they match than we know something is not exclusive.
|
06-25-09 12:35am
|
Reply
1066
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I do want to stress that this is for older content. I am not sure about newer content since I have not had a membership to Xisty in a while. The site still look to be worth joining and the new stuff could very well be exclusive since the site has had time to grow and become strong enough to produce.
|
06-24-09 09:06pm
|
Comment
1067
|
Xisty
(0)
|
|
06-24-09 08:15pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1068
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Glad to hear that you have no issues with most sites. I have heard of more people over seas from here having more issues with speed, but it does not seem to be everyone and it is not constantly the same sites they have issues with. Perhaps they are getting unlucky with a few sites and assuming it is because of location.
Either way, the videos on the sample page did not look like they were of that high of quality anyway! There were 1500 KBit/s which is "okay" but these did looked more like 500K videos than 1500K.
|
04-03-08 09:42am
|
Reply
1069
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Oh no! I only looked at the site because you mentioned having issues with the preview videos, so i thought I would look at them to see if this was affecting everyone you just seemingly you. Plus, they are samples (FREE!) so it did not cost me anything to check.
I have heard of many people having issues with many site when accessing from Europe. Most of that stuff is transmitted by satellite to get over seas. Downloads should still be okay unless they are throttling the connections, but that would give a minimum half a second delay on everything no matter what the connections are like. Speed of light governs this.
How is your connection to other US sites?
|
04-02-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
1070
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Denner, try the site again. I just downloaded a few of the sample videos and they came in quick. It "should" work fine for you, either you got there at a slow time or you are the unlucky one that their site will not send stuff too. It seems every site has an unlucky user! I downloaded 3 videos at once and it peaked off my 3 MBit connection here.
|
04-02-08 01:03pm
|
Review
1071
|
XX Cel
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Price less than $30
Very large breasts
A few sub-niches - pregnant, lactation
Photos update weekly
Very easy site to navigate
Newer videos are getting better in clearity
Small bio on the top of the model's page
Uses CCBill with no cross sales
No Download Limits
No DRM
Most videos in one piece, although a few in chunks |
| Cons: |
Video section updates only once every two weeks
Older videos do not look as good
File naming system needs work
Overall size of site is small for its age
Same ugly fat guy
Some women not overly attractive
Uses the common log in page with picture word |
| Bottom Line: |
XX Cel is based on women with very large breasts. I am talking about breasts often larger than my head! The site includes a handful of pregnant girls before and after birth and a fair amount of lactation. This is a fairly softcore site. The most sexual thing I have seen is the guy lick a girls pussy for a few seconds.
Lets start with the photos. There are currently 247 photo sets that are all in zips. This takes 4.12 GB of space, easily backed up onto dvd. The resolution is 1064x1600 and does not appear to use any softening. All 67 models have photo sets at this point.
On to the videos. The video quality varies depending on when the video is from. the newer videos are at 2115 KBit can be as low as 764. Ther resolutions are all over the place but most are 640x360 or higher up to 720x576. To download all of them you will end up with 189 files that equals exactly 10 GB. The durations varies greatly as well from just over a minute to over 13. There are not too many below 3 minutes though. The 2115 KBit videos look decent, but some of the older videos could use some serious touching up.
The guy that likes to talk and come into the scenes is pretty annoying. He is this fat guy that wears the same cloths all the time and has facial hair that does not appeal. Personally I could do without him, but I believe this site is made mostly for him to have an excuse to pay the women to let him suck their tits.
I do like that they have the pregnant girls come back after they have the baby. I have not seen too many sits that do this.
The file naming is pretty annoying though. The abbreviate the model name in the file names. They do not always abbreviate the same way though, and sometimes they abbreviate when the should not. Example, most abbreviations are 2 or 3 letters long, so why abbreviate the name KIM to "Ki"? All this does is make me have to type in the letter m in everything. Very annoying!
The only other down site I can think of is that they need to update more. Some of the stuff is back from early 2005 so I would expect a 4 year old site to be much large than this one. They need to do some serious work to their update schedule.
I also like that there is some very nice lactation videos here. There is one set of videos from sexy-lactations, but otherwise everything seems exclusive.
I would recommend this site to those who have a love for large breasts and those who like when they can deliver. :) If you are not a breast fan you probably will not get much out of this site since the smallest girl is a large c and all the others are significantly larger. It is a site that i will rejoin again after it has had some more growth time. Right now it is not worth $25 for only two video updates per month but it is certainly worth signing up for a month. |
|
01-30-09 04:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1072
|
XXX Movie Online
(0)
|
Reply of
pornoman's Review
We all very fresh from jumping all over some other people giving 100's to a site with out giving justification. There is still blood in the water here and hungry PUs. So please do not feed us!
Give up a bunch of information about this one. It seems there are no reviews yet, so you get to set the bar on this site. Set it high. Answer all the questions that where asked and tell us even more than that. The review as written is meaningless. Take a few moments to look over a few reviews by several usually reviews and you will quickly see what I am talking about.
Welcome to PornUsers! I hope to hear more from you about this site and many more.
|
03-12-09 09:11pm
|
Reply
1073
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
Perhaps you missed my review of this site. I was a member very recently and it seemed as if the new stuff was all being posted as 6 MBit and 1280x720. I have a number of scenes that are at this quality and they look fairly decent. Now there is a lot of content that is at the specs you quoted. If you look for the larger file sizes of whatever you downloaded you should find some of their newer stuff.
|
12-19-10 09:48pm
|
Reply
1074
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
There are several forum threads about download managers. There are many free ones and many to pay for. I personally use Internet Download Manager, or IDM. If you notice on the newer reviews by the TBP staff they also use IDM and tell you if it will work on the sites. It works on most, but to differing degrees.
Try a couple free ones and I believe IDM has a trial period as well. Downloads.com is a good place to see what is out there. One thing is for sure, if you download more than a few files here and there a manager will save you a lot of time and headache.
|
12-02-10 12:26pm
|
Reply
1075
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
They re not churning out updates like Twistys or Videobox, but it looked like a video per week. This is a good site to come back for periodic updates and allow to grow in between.
Do not get me wrong, if you have not joined the site in a year or so you will be pleasantly surprised with the new videos. They are definitely better than previous. Looking at the history of the site it is fair to assume they will be trying to make them better. The newer videos are certainly watchable, but it is so easy to be spoiled by the sites putting full HD scenes out at carry double the bitrate.
|
12-02-10 08:24am
|
