Because the alcohol companies can't add marijuana to their product line. ;-)
Prescription drugs are even more dangerous--they are literally doses of poison concocted in labs--but they are part of a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry. Alcohol definitely has also been doing harm as long as it's been around but it's also given some comfort and relaxation to people as well. Life sucks, and has sucked, for the majority of the human population for as long as it's been around so looking for something to take the edge off is logical.
Wow! First to vote and reply! Uh, what was the question again?
Not sure what this has to do with porn (both help you relax I guess) but yes, absolutely. There are more dangerous chemicals in much of the 'food' at your local grocery store, and that's before you even get to the pharmacy.
There are a couple of problems; drug laws, including ones outlawing marijuana, have been used to control people, not protect them, and the government would not like to lose that control anytime soon. The second is that marijuana may be too easy to grow and harvest for large companies to make it a competitive crop in the free market (it's called weed for a reason).
So we've come up with a basic qualifier for a starlet to be dubbed an "Anal Queen," is there anyone we would like to nominate, or I guess more accurately, crown?
A few years ago I would have said that maybe Audrey Hollander or [ignore]Aurora Snow[/ignore] should ascend this debauched throne but now it seems like the vast majority do some form of anal action pretty frequently if not every single scene.
(Interesting note; I recently watched a video of [ignore]Aurora Snow[/ignore] giving a radio interview where she talked about her career and she also mentioned how she warms up for backdoor scenes with her own 'anal kit'--funny but made a lot of sense too.)
Yeah, I guess I do...but we all have to love something, don't we? ;-)
Though it has been two years since I last reviewed them, over a year since I was a 'regular' member (I rejoined for the first time in a long while last month), and my newer score is lower than before. I miss the way they were a few years ago but I think they still kick ass for dude-free material.
I would have chosen "All of the Above" but "Taking 3 cocks anally" sounds damn near impossible at best. I guess how often is probably a better choice as long as its done enthusiastically.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 250+ smiling, skinny, shaved, super-hot hot models
+ Still almost purely solo- or girl-girl action that stays pretty entertaining
+ Amazing quality:
• videos: HD up to 1920x1080 @ 300 kb/s
• photos: hi-res are roughly 3900x2600px
+ Great quantity too; archived vids back to Apr 2007, photos much farther back
+ Daily video updates, new photo set released every two days
+ Download speeds have a lot of ass; I normally got about 1.3MB/s with a DL manager
+ They donate some of their pervy profits to charity, in case philanthropy is a deciding factor
Cons:
- Large percentage of videos are just BTS, and with photo sets the BTS is usually just mixed in
- Some models' content takes a long time to get released or simply stays unreleased
- Site design works well for what it is, but still has NO search function
- They are beginning to delve into boy-girl content, even if only lightly (read more in BL)
- Despite the fun some content can get predictable and routine
- 2 years since my first review and I still wish they would shoot more American girls or non-Euro girls
- I don't get to meet these girls in person! :-(
Bottom Line:
What can I say that hasn't already been said so many times and so well about one of my all time favorite adult sites over the years--hell, over the history of much of the crazy web itself, seeing how these guys have been finding and shooting hot shaved ladies since 1996. And since they have been doing this for so long they know a thing or two about getting the goods; great photo and video quality, lots of content, fast access, and above all some very happy models, many of whom come back wanting more.
That last point, happy models who become 'repeat offenders' shall we say, is not something I take lightly when I am looking for a new site to join and it's something where ALS has never faltered. I may be in the minority when I say this, but I genuinely don't enjoy porn where the performers, know matter how willing, are abused, beaten up, disrespected, or at the end of the day just left dissatisfied and unhappy. Of course ALS being in the girls only genre probably helps keep things in check but it, like the majority of sites, is still owned and run by a male and caters to a primarily male audience.
And despite all of this male input the output for many years was totally female; female models with female assistants in most cases and a female co-performer or two in some others. But in the past few years they have, if ever so slightly, started to also use male assistants, or at least made them more visible in both photos and videos--not my cup of tea, thank you very much. Even more alarming--or simply the next logical step, depending on your view--they have just recently shot an actual boy-girl scene. It's yet to be released and is described as a blowjob scene with swallowing, but time will tell as to where ALS steers its content.
Generally speaking, and if you're not looking for hardcore content, there's a lot to love here and at least a little to hate. So take your pick; young, skinny, shaved, mostly white models who are not too shy, so don't be surprised by a single model performing many if not all of the following; peeing, fisting, speculum and other crazy insertions, anal, and near constant spreading. The site design may not be impressive to many, nor may be the large amount of BTS, but don't let it fool you--as girls-only content goes they do not disappoint.
I do wish they would be more consistent in releases though. They still have a habit of letting members vote on models' scenes to determine release order and this can mean months before a model's whole shoot is available, and some just never gets released at all. I guess this is a good thing--so much content that there's not enough time to release it all--but I would like to see it eventually. And as unique as some of their content is it can get predictably routine; toy A into slot b, and so on.
But damn if they don't make it look hot time and time again with each new model they find and corrupt. All these years and I'm still sold! :-P
Limited Time Discount Offer if You're an Als Member
I already posted a comment on the Als Scan review page and it wasn't taken down so I will add one here as well; Alex offered up a great discount ($9.95 for a month, with a same price rebill) to Als Angels if you are a current member of Als Scan.
If you're a 'Scan member then you can login and read his March 30 blog for instructions on how to get the discount. He said it's a limited time offer--maybe a week or so--but it's still a good discount if you're seeking some shaven angels. ;-)
I hope I don't get in trouble for this comment (beware the wrath of Khan!) but I thought I would pass along a discount to other current Als Scan members.
In his Mar 30 blog director/founder/master Alex offered a discount to their sister site Als Angels for a very low price ($9.95 for a month, that would rebill at the same price). I am not sure what spurred this on but he was talking about an Angels model and her unique anatomy in the same blog, or maybe he was just in a good mood so who knows.
I won't give out the exact details since, as I mentioned above, this is for current Als Scan members only so if you're a member you can login and read the March 30 blog entry to figure out how if you're interested. He said this was a very limited time offer, like a week-ish or around that time frame, but it's a hefty discount.
Ah, what a great poll! My thinking is if you're going to have a terabyte or bigger hard drive (or even one with a few gigs) then organization is key.
While others have mentioned they like to be surprised, I don't. I want my filth and I want it now! :-) So my system is usually organized like this: Site Name>Model Name>Videos/Photos (separate folders for each model). If it's a DVD site I then organize this way: Genre>DVD title. Genre can get pretty specific, and still causes a lot of confusion but it usually works.
For my biggest and oldest site collection, ALS Scan, I did the method where there are separate video and photo folders and then separate model folders within each one--big mistake! Every time I see some photos and I want to see a corresponding video or vice versa I have to go back to the separate video or photo folder and then find the model name all over again. I have yet to reorganize it and I regret ever splitting it up this way originally so I don't recommend people do this for big collections.
Hmm, for a few days but that was from shoveling/cleanup not loss of electricity or Internet service.
Losing food and heat is one thing but Internet--boy, I better have that reconnected very quickly! Just kidding, Khan! At least you and your family made it through in one piece this winter. Hope no one else had it too hard these past few months.
Aw man, I would love to have a hot porn star (gotta populate the island) but if I don't have sun screen I would probably die of exposure within a few hours.
: - (
Knowing my luck the island would have trees for shade from the sun but the porn star would accidentally eat a poisonous plant and die to leave me like Tom Hanks in "Cast Away"--alone with dental problems and only a volleyball to talk to for the next four years.
That hardcore scene was a bonus of another site's content caught behind the scenes by ALS--not exactly there regular material by any means, and not even theirs really. I didn't like that idea at all, but it was irregular material so I didn't make much of it.
Maybe I should blame Tanner Mayes since she's in both your examples...though I am sure if I had been the cameraman she would've been asking for a plane ticket home not if I wanted to play 'never-never land.' : - (
While I haven't seen the video yet (they haven't released it) I think Alex is just hyping his language up a little. If you're used to his writing, mostly in his blog, he is in love with hyperbole like most other adult webmasters out--hell, everyone on the Net--and you can't take him at his exact word. 'Ram' probably doesn't mean Max Hardcore is making a conjugal visit or that it's that violent of a scene, it's just Alex's way of getting members to keep on clickin'.
I think he was also trying to emphasize they weren't suddenly doing facial or an all out hardcore scene, just a BJ for now. Members are probably thrown off plenty with a guy entering the scene they don't need him shooting off his fireworks all over the place. Plus I'm sure there are more than enough body fluids to clean up with just one female model! :-0
Well this is really new territory for ALS--just read the first two responses to my comment--hardcore has never been their thing. At all. For longtime members this is like throwing out the Bill of Rights because it goes against what the site has been traditionally doing for years.
Far too expensive? Really? I've seen new players for under $150. I think Amazon currently sells a Sony Blu-Ray player for about $130. Of course this is just the player, and these rarely, if ever, come with an HDMI cable that's required to send a high definition signal to the display (which needs to be HD to show the best picture, BTW). These cables usually start around $15 dollars and can easily go over $100 so I'm sure it's a complex cable-player manufacturer conspiracy devised to nickel and dime consumers for their recession dollars. ; )
I would argue a complete system--HD display, player, and sound system (optional but it's nice)--is where the initial cost comes in. My real problem is the disc prices are outrageous. Unless you're a genuine film aficionado with money to burn and DVD resolution just doesn't cut it for you I can't see much benefit (literally, my vision is terrible) in buying a Blu-Ray version of a release over the DVD one. Studios don't seem to be pushing Blu-Ray versions much beyond mentioning them first in marketing; "Available on Blu-Ray and DVD Tuesday!"
And I'd assume the studios, or whoever they contract to author the discs, simply make two compressed versions from the final cut of the film or whatever show they are selling. They might offer additional audio tracks and bonus crap if it fits on a Blu-Ray disc but DVDs still sell. But I don't even think a lot of buyers' decisions are based that much on specific extras or bonus features--they really just want the movie to play, not skip, and be able to do that over and over again for years.
And I haven't even gotten a chance for her to become my girlfriend yet! : ( I guess I'll wait and see the video to make my final judgment, but I'm not too happy about this experimenting they're doing. Amy Brooke sounds like a genuinely crazy horny girl--not the shy first-timer type--so it probably wasn't too hard to get her to do a BJ scene. At least Alex claims she did lots of anal and squirting.
From webmaster/owner Alex's director blog on March 19:
"We did shoot our first POV BJ scene with Amy, too. It went very well. Again, don't yell at me if you are upset about seeing some cock. We are only going to do this for video and we will be providing two edits of the scene. We shot them in such a way that we can present it with and without the BJ portion. Simply download the version that best suits you. Our POV BJ style series is going to be called "Direct Deposit". It involves the model deep throating the cock, and then when the guy is about to shoot his load, he rams his cock down her throat thereby directly depositing his entire load into her stomach."
(I am only quoting the part of the blog that pertains to this comment.)
Well I never thought I would see the day!
Longtime loyal followers of ALS know that they have a pretty strict girls-only model policy--i.e. no guys to do the penetration or pretty much anything else--but with a new model they shot this week, Amy Brooke, they have entered uncharted territory. Don't get me wrong, Amy sounds like a great model; a lover of anal, squirting, and other such perversions, but I don't want to see ALS do hardcore, at least not the kind involving guys.
Call me stubborn, orthodox, old-fashioned, close-minded, I don't care; I have always counted on ALS to bring out the hot girls while leaving the guys to drool off camera. I'm not going to "yell" at Alex as he asked in his blog but I will cry, at least a little for the old ALS.
(BTW, I am sure Alex is getting plenty of hate mail over this already, and forwarding him this comment isn't my intention. I don't need him quoting every complaint and complement I ever make about the site just so he can mount a defense and call me out.)
You can get rid of your spy agencies in Denmark simply by voting them out? Sorry, but here in America voting only changes the names on the corner offices and the photos on the wall (which I have always found very creepy). The last thing any voter would be able to do is dictate the policies of the FBI or NSA or any of the other alphabet soup agencies 'protecting' us, much less get rid of them all together. Hell, if we could do that I might start voting again and get the defense budget cut by half, legalize all drugs and prostitution, outlaw the Patriot Acts and have the top officials from the last Bush administration arrested and sent to Gitmo. ; )
I am sure they are already reading my e-mails so why not all my "web travels" as well? The only problem is I am a pretty boring guy online (and in real life...) and they're just wasting their time. Oh fuck it, keep up the good work FBI, CIA, NSA, or whoever are spending their time, money--ours, by the way--and manpower finding out how perverted its own citizens really are.
If these James Bond super spy wannabe assholes wish to catch real criminals I suggest they stop reading citizens' browser histories and start doing real intelligence work.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
