| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree that the old warehouse is probably the worst place to shoot but I find it's because it can be really creepy and weird, like the scene of a crime rather than something erotic and enjoyable.
|
03-14-10 06:16pm
|
Reply
402
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sounds nice and I guess you can never be too prepared (though I am sure you'll be overwhelmed with choice in videos and photos). Why are you so worried about 2012? Sarah Palin or someone even crazier and stupider is going to get elected and society will collapse within a matter of days?
|
03-11-10 09:40pm
|
Reply
403
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
That way you can defend your collection by force, right? (Remind me to never piss you off. ; ) )
|
03-10-10 09:33pm
|
Reply
404
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, never.
Most politicians are anti-porn even if they've never been asked and are not open about it (just like their extramarital affairs, private income sources, lobbying connections, criminal records, Ponzi schemes, etc.). I don't vote as it is so it doesn't exactly effect me--99% of politicians don't give a shit about 99% of what actually matters to me anyway.
Like Drooler mentioned porn is just a wedge issue designed to distract voters and pretty much anyone else who will listen from caring or even thinking about real issues. And if some political actor genuinely cares about porn they are usually just using it to push religion--masqueraded as 'morals' and 'values'--further into government affairs despite the Establishment Clause.
|
03-10-10 09:11pm
|
Reply
405
|
Femanic
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Nice review, BadMrFrosty.
I have to say I have more than just a passing interest in joining this site but those download limits you mentioned are unbelievable--hourly, what's this site thinking?! I guess all things in moderation is the reasoning here.
|
03-09-10 08:15pm
|
Reply
406
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I just joined a few days ago and they do have quite a bit of old-but-new-to-you releases (previously unreleased) as well as some so-so remasters. I like the video remasters because it seems in the past ('90s through early 2000s) they weren't as concerned about video releases as they are now and a lot of this stuff just didn't make it to the site or wasn't archived for long periods like they do now (which go back to April 2007).
The photo remasters are really nothing special in my book; much bigger sizes but a lot of them are from when ALS was shooting on film and they just don't digitize as well as pictures originally shot digitally (sounds obvious, but some film can look great even when it's been scanned). I assume these are from negatives or slides or something similar but the colors look too dark and deep and the film grain is obvious in the higher resolution photos. I don't think they are really worth all the trouble unless you have a real boner for a model from years ago.
Also, a note about their video download options, much like a recent thread, there doesn't seem to be any noticeable difference between quality in older ones. For example a recent Brea release shot in the mid-2000s; it was shot in SD and the download options are either a 640x480 DivX or a 720x540 WMV. It's a short four minute video of her, well, let's say making a very good excuse to clean the bathroom floor. ; ) Anyway the WMV is slightly bigger in resolution but the file size is 16MB smaller and I can't see any difference in quality.
Their HD releases however are offered in three options of two sizes; 1280x720 in MP4 and DivX plus massive 1920x1080 WMVs that are around twice the file size of the DivXs and MP4s, and the qualitative difference is noticeable here (as are the gargantuan space requirements).
They are shooting some super hot new models, but it's still fun to look at previous models without having to take up vast swaths of hard drive space with half hour bonus videos.
|
03-09-10 01:35pm
|
Reply
407
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Lol. Yes, and women WILL judge and get testy! It sucks because women don't see it as just looking but as serious boredom/disinterest/wandering in a relationship. I think you're lucky if she's quietly accepting or at least neutral on the subject--she doesn't gloat about it during the holidays but she doesn't seek out a marriage counselor either.
|
03-09-10 01:08pm
|
Reply
408
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I would say "Never! I've been with this porn a lot longer than I've been with you and it's never yelled at me or judged me!" but on the other hand I am constantly reminding myself to never say "never" as I really can't predict the future. Having said that (and not having a girlfriend at the moment) I would expect it to be a very good and fulfilling--not to mention distracting--relationship for me to go and say "I guess I don't need this porn after all."
I've said it before but if you have to choose between a partner and your collection you probably didn't do a great job choosing your partner and you really shouldn't have to give up a harmless innocent habit just to please someone else.
|
03-09-10 01:01pm
|
Reply
409
|
Filthy And Fisting
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Welcome to PU and thanks for the review.
This looks like a cool site with a lot of what I like to call 'entertaining' content and sister sites but it's just too damn expensive for what doesn't look to be a lot of quantity. Wish they had a full trial available. : ( I do love how you describe Alysa as a "Super Mega Extreme Gaporama Babe." Wow! She's hired!
|
03-06-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
410
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Torque's Review
Welcome to PU and thanks for the review, but I was wondering if you could give a little more insight into your score and review. For example, in the Bottom Line you wrote that the site is "the superior one" to five other soft core but you didn't explain why or how it's superior. Just some suggestions, and welcome to PU.
|
03-06-10 12:31pm
|
Comment
411
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
03-06-10 12:24pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
412
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
"Didn't know women have orgasms"...in porn. ; )
I just couldn't resist either, but c'mon, really? Every time a girl does a scene she lifts off at the end and produces another mind-blowing orgasm? Sorry, but I doubt it (but I can dream can't I?).
Unless she's a squirter--another controversial topic--than what exactly does she have to physically do or 'prove' the way a guy does when he, ahem, hits his mark? I understand some convulsing and screaming as if she is possessed by satan himself is to be expected in some cases, but a little light moaning and groaning and most directors seem to be satisfied. It's hard to believe that they are really climaxing that often though.
|
03-06-10 11:32am
|
Reply
413
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I have to say the guys armed with the big guns (you know, measured in the double digits) truly are stunt cocks. What other career path is going to reward them for being so, well, naturally rewarded themselves?
My problem is that too often John Doe's third leg becomes the focus of these hardcore scenes and most of the video is spent watching him thrust/force his way into the poor woman like he's helping her commit hara-kiri using his penis-sword of death. It also doesn't help that so many of these guys look like they never tire of watching the girl on the receiving end suffer--their creepy-crawly sneers and jeers don't exactly make the whole experience look like a romantic date. It's like the dudes have turned into Toyotas and can't stop 'moving forward.' :0
|
03-04-10 05:23pm
|
Reply
414
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
If they're going to have smaller cocks then they might as well not be able hold their fire through half hour super-boners either, if a "more 'real' or relatable" feel is the goal. Oh, and they don't get to do all the crazy contortionist positions and acts we civilians can only dream about (and even then it's kinda hard), all with average-looking girls only--no super honeys.
C'mon, it's porn, it's fantasy! Yeah, I wish I was more relatable to the actor, not the other way around, but if I really want a more realistic experience then I'll go and watch some amateur stuff or just turn off the video altogether and get rejected in person. :(
Plus, porn should be attracting the well-endowed as sex is pretty much the whole focus, and the penis is crucial to boy-girl sex. It would be like asking professional basketball teams to not be recruiting so many tall guys, or beauty pageants to stop using so many beautiful women.
|
03-04-10 05:09pm
|
Reply
415
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Laptops are incredibly handy but I prefer desktops; better keyboard, monitor, with lots of upgradeability.
|
02-24-10 02:20pm
|
Reply
416
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'd like to but I simply don't have the time or the patience to de-douchebag the countless videos in my collection that lose focus of the people who are actually in front of the camera not the snickering drooling horn dogs (no offense, Drooler) off to the side.
What I'd would really love to do is get the raw footage and edit that down. I bet I could make a far more enjoyable or at least faster paced cut without all the bullshit I normally sit through. I'm an impatient guy and I get it already; she's stripping but she eventually needs to get fully naked and cut down on all the "ooos" and "ahhs" poses. I can fantasize pretty well on my own and a lot of these girls are probably nursing hangovers or coming down from some pretty mean highs so they don't need to act as if they are having their best orgasm ever, especially multiple times in the same video.
Oh, and one more thing: whoever edits hardcore videos, please--I beg of you!--stop intercutting with a shot of the dude's face in pure ecstasy/agony (it's kinda hard to tell) as he launches his fireworks show, okay? You don't need to show me him whacking his way to victory for five minutes either but I don't need his contorting facial expression to 'get' the scene. Though the female orgasm may be a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma guys' orgasms are not that hard to figure out when you see them onscreen, so get rid of his fucking face shots.
|
02-22-10 03:54pm
|
Comment
417
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
02-20-10 02:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
418
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
At $35 for U.S.-based perverts I would say this site is on the high end of the price spectrum, at least for a monthly rate of a single site, but rejoining only every so often I would say it's worth it. But $47.81 is really pushing it even for the quality of the heart-stoppingly hot honeys who step in front of their cameras.
Whatever you do I would not recommend sending cash though, you just might have to calm down and wait a while. : (
|
02-20-10 02:41pm
|
Reply
419
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Great review, Wittyguy. I agree this is one of the better rear entry action sites out there, considering how widespread spreading the ass wide open is (I think I picked up too much wit from your review ;) ). I also think it's one of the better sites of the 21st Sextury network, especially with all the hardcore action going on at the other sites. Zoliboy now has a lot of boy-girl hardcore but it's not always anal and has its own crazy fetishes to fulfill as well.
I don't get the way they do photos either; they are obviously professionally shot and high quality except that they are so tiny. I don't think any site should release photos (besides thumbnails) that are smaller than their current video resolution and should really makes them significantly bigger.
Simply can't go wrong in your butt?! I'll take your word for it...
|
02-19-10 02:47pm
|
Reply
420
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I would love to say never cancelled but I don't want to risk burning out on one site so I cancel and then wait for fresh filth to build up and then rejoin six months or so down the line to load up my hard drives again.
|
02-18-10 12:02pm
|
Reply
421
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
And you have a loving partner too--you never forgot about her, right? ; )
|
02-17-10 08:24pm
|
Reply
422
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I was a little worried you had some insider information, plus since you have terabytes of porn I figured you would still have plenty to 'do' if PU bit the dust.
|
02-16-10 06:37pm
|
Reply
423
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
I would use the same approach I take whenever I lose or accidentally delete data: "Cry and beg them to come back!" and probably cry some more. If I cry over pretty much everything but spilled milk (and even then it depends on the situation) I sure as hell am going to cry when my community of loyal perverts is shut down. : )
|
02-16-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
424
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Doesn't the rest of the world get pissed when we Americans use the term football for what's played at the Super Bowl and soccer for what everyone else calls football?
: )
|
02-12-10 05:38pm
|
Reply
425
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I would say that your first paragraph can also apply to men, though I bet most of us are far too 'manly' to admit it.
I am not saying men and women are alike in this regard but I think, at least in the West, that cultures have some pretty screwed up ideas about sexuality or at least in terms of how rigidly we feel we have to define it.
For example, If you are a male heterosexual then there is a sort of list of unwritten rules that you are expected to follow with the opposite sex, and engaging in a number of activities--even solely with the opposite sex--is strictly forbidden. Just think of the number of times you've dismissed something as 'gay' despite the fact that it would be with someone of the opposite sex. Wouldn't a man doing something with a woman already be defined as straight?
The same is true of women and homosexuals, though I would argue gays are a little more open minded as few societies in the modern world truly accept gay people as equally as they do straight people and thus they are not as worried about what rules and norms they are expected to follow in order to please the society.
But back to the question, I would say "Only a few are" but defining "few" very loosely as I don't think anyone knows about "all women" and the question is a little absolute in that regard. Maybe I'm just fantasizing here, but I am sure there at least a few who are truly comfortable with both men and women and wouldn't have it any other way, but the vast majority would define their sexuality as either gay or straight.
|
02-10-10 05:18pm
|
